Wallace Is Safe
Jackie Manuel and Dahntay Jones remain in the potential line of fire. Meanwhile, from team indications, rookie Brandon Wallace appears to be safe. . . .
Ainge met with officials from the team's Development League affiliate, the Utah Flash, for more than two hours. Celtics coach Doc Rivers said all of his rookies (Gabe Pruitt, Glen Davis, Jackie Manuel, and Brandon Wallace) are Flash candidates. "Hopefully the players will understand that it's not like a punishment to come and play for us," Flash owner Brandt Anderson said. "We'll make it as nice as we can. We'll make it such that they'll get the All-Star treatment as much as you can in the D-League."
In other news bits, Tony Allen won't play tonight because of an eye injury and Scot Pollard is still on the shelf.
In case you forgot what Wallace looks like:

27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Only one comment from the Celtics camp concerning Batista sticks out in my mind is about his defense. Doc commented more than once that Batista’s defense was questionable. I thought like many of you they’d keep him because he was a hustling big man to fill the void left by Pollard and his balky ankle.
by BleedinGreen417 on Oct 17, 2007 7:23 AM EDT reply actions
Batista looked very SLOW during the T-Wolves game. Really, what did he bring to the table?
Wallace has potential. He was playing out of position in college. At small forward, he could develop into a solid defender.
Pruitt has the d league written all over him. He is not ready.
As for Manuel, it was nice knowing you, but you are GONE.
by The Bones on Oct 17, 2007 7:27 AM EDT reply actions
So Rivers cuts Batista, and then worries (quite rightly) about Perkins getting into foul trouble against the Knicks’ big front line. Well, Doc, if you still had Batista, you’d have another widebody to handle that situation.
Sometimes I wonder why there isn’t a family of woodpeckers living on Doc Rivers’ head.
Look, I’m not suggesting that Batista is the second coming of Wayne Embry. But Dahntay Jones and Jackie Manuel aren’t the second coming of Bruce Bowen, either.
as they say you can’t teach size. I thought Batista looked good on the boards. I question this move; with pollard out and Perk our only real center I don’t see why we were in such a hurry to cut batista. I like wallace’s potential but batista fills an immediate need, wallace doesn’t. On the positive side I think this opens up minutes for Powe who I’m a big fan of. I think Butler will be the last cut and that pruitt is headed to the d league along with wallace.
I am a lot more interested in whether we gel as a 1st unit,how tight the second team rotation is by Doc, and how deal with any nagging injuries, instead of debating the merits of keeping, or not keeping, the slow Artis Gilmore Batista.
Like Red2 says, this keeps the door open for PO(we) who is twice the man Batista is on the boards. If I recall Batista originally said he was not crazy about being in Boston the first place. Well now he can head back to Europe and work on his manners.
Next!!!
BTW Braveheart was a good keeper and a heck of a leaper.
Watching the preseason games showed me that Batista simply isn’t an NBA player. He has okay size for a big but he’s really, really stiff and slow. We would all be yelling for him to get off the court anyway, I’m glad the option isn’t there for Doc to screw up. Hopefully Danny can address any depth issues at C but if it doesn’t happen immediately, I’m not going to star worrying about this team.
Wallace is a good pick to stick around of the lot, throw him in the D-League and see what happens. I do hope Davis sticks around with the main club, he should be able to earn minutes this season if he works hard enough.
The wisdom of carrying one healthy center and one true point guard on a 15 man squad just baffles me! Pollard hasn’t stepped foot on the court yet, so he’s nowhere near ready to help. If Perk or Rondo go down with, say, a severe ankle sprain, and misses three weeks do you really like the alternatives? Makes no sense!
I can see it now, T or R Allen bringing the ball up against a press by B Knight! What a nightmare!—-and small ball, here we go again. Ugh!!!!!!!!!!
I don’t think Batista wanted to be an end-of-the-bench guy. The way he and his agent were talking when they first came, I think he expected to be a solid top 8 rotation guy, and when it became clear that he wouldn’t be that, they probably agreed that it was best for him to go. I do find the move curious. But you can’t keep guys around who don’t want the role available to them.
I’m not too worried about it. If Danny Fortson and Malik Rose can have productive years as 6-8 centers, I don’t see why Powe can’t give you 10-12 minutes a night there. Besides, many of the contenders in the East (and West for that matter) are playing PF as centers. Detroit plans to start Rasheed at C; Chicago starts Ben Wallace, whose been an undersized center all along; Toronto starts Bosh and Bargnani. And none of them are bringing real centers off the bench (unless you call Rasho a real center). I think Powe brings more defense to the table than Batista, even at his size. We’ll be fine. But, obviously, it would be nice if Perk just stopped swiping at the ball 20 feet away from the basket. That would be much better.
Brick, Scalabrine did such an stellar job on the boards last season at the center position. It’s only logical for Rivers to give him the backup center job. So there was no need for Batista….Or Davis….Or Powe….We’re all set.
The woodpeckers are exhausted from banging their beeks against the wall, Brick. So am I.
I am so annoyed with League Pass. I can’t even sign up yet in my area!! They say they think Saturday at the earliest.
by Bleedgreen on Oct 17, 2007 10:09 AM EDT reply actions
If Powe is going to play mostly the 5, we should have cut or traded him a long time ago. I was unimpressed with his PT last season, and don’t expect much improvement. He is a poor man’s Shelden Williams, if that is possible. Only saw the Minnesota game, but Batista did not look slow to me for a guy with his size. I also worry that Pollard will be hurt much of the year.
With Batista, I wouldn’t be surprised if it wasn’t the Celtics call for him to be released. He was signed to Maccabi way too quickly not to have a deal doen already. His agent knew he was going to be the 15th guy on the roster, so he got him a deal elsewhere and then asked the C’s to release him. Kinda sucks, but it seemed the only thing he had going for him was size. If that’s all we are looking for then go get Kandi again.
by Seadog on Oct 17, 2007 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
I’d prefer Batista over Kandi. I look at Kandi and I just think waste of talent. I don’t know what if anything occured behind the scenes.
On the surface thought you have Perk with a history of injury and fould issues. Pollard thus far is damaged goods. Scal is Scal. You are potentially putting a lot of pressure on Powe and Baby if you don’t have some big man deal waiting in the wings.
Batista is/was serviceable. Being in the predicament we were in I think it was a bit premature in letting the guy go.
by docextension on Oct 17, 2007 12:44 PM EDT reply actions
For a bunch of guys who try to act like they are basketball geniuses, I find it funny that you don’t even know enough to realize that this was Danny’s decision, not Doc’s. Doc isn’t the one making these cuts. He obviously has input up the ladder and is consulted by Danny, but he does not run this ship. I just hope that it is just another way for you to rip on Doc and that you really aren’t that ignorant…
Batista was either wearing concrete Nike’s or is so terribly slow compared to real NBA players that he would never make it. I’ll take Powe anyday out there over that stiff. He was worth a look, but that was it.
Brandon Wallace is a future rotation player on someone’s team for sure…this is good news that they are keeping him…I’m shocked Manuel has made it this far, this makes me think he might be kept…
by modawg3434 on Oct 17, 2007 1:24 PM EDT reply actions
docextension – you might be right about Kandi, but the thing I liked about him was that he didn’t make waves on the end of the bench, and he did have ’’talent’’. I haven’t seen anything out of Batista that suggests that he has more than mediocre ability against NBA level competition. I don’t think they need to add another big, but if they did I would be all for Kandi coming back. He has flashes of his higher end talent, and off the bench there are very few bigs that can say that.
If there has been a mistake made over the past few years and there have been many it was an overabunance of 2s and 3s and a lack of big boy help. I am hoping history isn’t repeating itself.
by docextension on Oct 17, 2007 6:49 PM EDT reply actions
Batista was another Tiago Splitter for the European wet dreamers. Let’s give Doc and Danny this much credit….they picked up Batista, if he had game they’d have kept him For every foreign Dirk there is a bigger bust such as the Indy/GS point guard. C’mon guys…Doc isn’t the perfect NBA coach but I doubt he’s wrong on Batista or Wallace (as a keeper)


































