Brown Still An Option

by Jeff Clark on Oct 21, 2007 10:51 PM EDT in Boston Celtics News & Links

Shira Springer reports that if PJ Brown wanted to play this year, the Celtics could be an option:

"I'm not going to say he won't play, but it's not something he's really thinking about now," said Brown's agent, Mark Bartelstein. "He's enjoying time with his family.
"If P.J. decided to play, he would probably decide to play for a team that would be a championship contender, and the Celtics certainly fall into that category. But he has not put his mind into that thought process."
Asked if he contacted Brown, Ainge said no. Asked if he had considered Brown as a future option, Ainge kept quiet.

Tweet Comment 7 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I wouldn’t want him in December or January to mess up our system and chemistry. Either he goes all the way or none.

by P_two on Oct 21, 2007 11:22 PM EDT reply actions

He is retired and we are way down on the list of hopefuls even if he un-retires.

The guy isn’t coming here and he’s retired.

by Who on Oct 21, 2007 11:59 PM EDT reply actions

He’s a rebounder, that’s it. If messing up team chemistry means PJ Brown is backing up Perk and KG and Glen Davis and Pollard move their way down the bench I gladly welcome the adjustment period.

by davemonsterband on Oct 22, 2007 4:25 AM EDT reply actions

So are we resigned to the fact that House, Pruitt, RA, and TA are the back-up point guards? If that’s the case, play them extensively for the rest of the preseason for a look-see.

by halfman/halfoyster on Oct 22, 2007 7:20 AM EDT reply actions

If someone gets injured you MIGHT see him, but highly doubtful.

Of course, part of me is saying that Doc did say he wanted to cut the team down to 14 just incase they had to pick someone up . . .

by tmcdon on Oct 22, 2007 8:56 AM EDT reply actions

i would have preferred batista- young,a rebouder with some scoring ability. because of pollard’s injuries and age, we need another big- you better believe it.

by nazzbo on Oct 22, 2007 9:25 AM EDT reply actions