Do You Believe in Magic?
Without a doubt, tonight the Celtics faced their toughest match-up of the season to date. The 8-2 Orlando Magic boast a very productive starting five: Dwight Howard has improved his scoring average while remaining a rebounding beast; Rashard Lewis has thus far silenced the naysayers who wondered about his max value contract by giving the Magic the scorer that they needed; Hedo Turkoglu, reminds the casual NBA fan who utters "Hedo who?" that he is a pretty nice all-around player (18ppg, 6rpg, 4apg);
Jameer Nelson has added nearly 2.5 assists per game to his ledger; and Keith Bogans has become a real three-point specialist (60 of his 77 field goal attempts have been threes). But as with the new look Celtics, the real story may be the Magic defense, as they are holding teams to 41.8% shooting, second in the NBA to…….well, if you don’t know to whom, you need to turn in your CelticsBlog ID card right now.
Howard started tonight’s game showing off his array of moves (some improved, some brand new): a left-handed half-hook (which Kevin Garnett goal-tended), a missed right handed post-up of Kendrick Perkins, and a dunk on a feed by Nelson. Conversely, the Celtics looked very rough, producing several ugly turnovers: Perkins posts in the lane and proceeds to dribble the ball with every part of his body except his hand; Rondo impersonates a foal taking a pratfall with a wide open path to the hoop in front of him; and Ray Allen gets stripped while going to the basket.
The Magic jump out to a quick 9-2 lead and Doc Rivers calls a timeout, replacing Rondo with Eddie House. The results are mixed: the bleeding slows, but House immediately has his jumper from the corner blocked and the turnovers continue. Bogans and Nelson are looking like all stars, and the Magic are clearly setting the tempo, getting the shots and match-ups that they want.
Howard looks like he has ramped up his defense as well as his offense, blocking two shots in the quarter and establishing a clear presence in the lane on several other shots. Ray Allen can not hit anything and has two turnovers in the quarter. Pierce and Garnett try desperately to keep the Celtics in the game. Unfortunately, several bad fouls, bad turnovers (seven in the quarter), poor shooting and a complete inability to stop the Magic characterize the Celtics worst opening quarter of the year, down 28-17.
The carnage continued into the second quarter. The fouls come fast and furious at both ends of the court. The Celtics pick up their fifth foul only three minutes in with three, shall we say, questionable calls on Tony Allen. The quarter is typified by a series about halfway through in which Brian Scalabrine grabs Howard’s shirt and gets shoved in return, followed by lots of yelling at the refs and players angrily milling about. The play ultimately results in a PF on Scalabrine and technicals on Garnett and Howard. By the end of the half, the Celtics have amassed a staggering 17 PFs and the Magic 10.
The Celtics manage to keep the Magic within range for most of the quarter, but in the last few minutes the Magic start to pull away. The one bright spot of the quarter is Rondo who scores 14 pts on 6 for 6 shooting from the field, including three jump shots. There is a scary moment where Rondo goes down hard on a spectator’s chair after being fouled and does not get up right away. Fortunately for the Celtics, he is able to shake it off and even makes both of his foul shots. At the end of the half, the struggling Celtics are down 58 to 41, their biggest deficit of the year.
Rondo continues his solid play into the third and Pierce his aggressive drive and finish game, including traditional three point plays on consecutive possessions. Orlando’s lead extends to twenty before the Celtics finally start to respond and reduce the point differential. A Garnett tip following Rondo’s first miss brings the C’s within ten at 77-69, and the Magic call a time-out. Trevor Ariza travels coming out of the timeout and Pierce hits an elbow jumper to bring the Cs within six. Lewis responds with a drive for two points, and a foul and free throw bring the gap back to nine.
Rondo immediately turns the ball over, and Ariza hits a jumper to bring the lead back to eleven. A Pierce foul shot makes it ten, then Garnett picks up his fourth foul on Howard with 1:05 remaining, and the Magic lead is back up11. But the Celtics continue to slice away at the lead, and House hits a two-point jumper at the buzzer to cut the lead to seven at 83-76. The Celtics achieved what they had to: they brought this game within reach going into the fourth quarter.
Energy is high at the start of the fourth. The lineup to start the quarter is Rondo, Posey, Tony Allen, Pollard, and Pierce. After a nice third quarter, the Celtics shooting struggles return. However, they keep fighting for points. After a nice steal and dunk by Tony Allen with just under 10 minutes to go, it’s a 4 point game. At 6:34 House hits a three pointer bringing it to a two point game. At six minutes Pierce goes to Posey who buries a three, giving the Cs their first lead of the game.
The bizarre foul calls continue, generally favoring Orlando (Tommy Heinsohn is not just being Tommy tonight, the league should look and see if Tim Donaghy snuck into the building). At five minutes Turkoglu hits a three and the Cs are down 5 points again. Doc calls a full time out. The gap vacillates between one and six points until Posey gets his sixth foul (called by the prepubescent ref of this questionable crew) and is out of the game. With two minutes left, the gap is back down to two points.
After hitting jumpers all game, Rondo hesitates when he is wide open with 1:38 left, dribbles right, and causes a three second call because his teammates assumed he was going up with the shot. Ugh. Tony Allen does him one better on the next possession putting the ball on the bottom of the rim on a wide open lay-up following a nice pass from Pierce. At 1:28 Nelson hits two free throws, and Orlando is up by 4 points. But the Celtics continue to hang in there and with 15 seconds left, it is back to a two point game.
Garnett takes the intentional on Lewis to stop the clock, putting him out of the game with his sixth foul. Lewis hits both of his free throws, bringing Orlando’s lead back to four. After another timeout, Ray Allen buries a three point shot closing the gap to one with 7.7 seconds left in the game. Pierce fouls Rashard Lewis on the in-bound pass. Lewis misses the first shot and hits the second, leaving 7.2 seconds on the clock. After some inbound foul ups with the official timer, Pierce calls for the ball from Rondo and misses a deep three.
Thus ends both the game and our visions of an 82-0 season. Final score Magic 104-102. The Celtics fought the good fight, digging their way out of a twenty point third quarter deficit. But, in the end, the magic was with Orlando tonight.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
At least the Celtics the pressure of ending the season on a perfect record… Now on to reality… ;)
by Cry Baby on Nov 18, 2007 10:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oddly we started off the season very strong defensively, we showed lapses in D and need to shore that up. I don’t see the Celtic intensity at the start of recent games that KG has brought out of this team in preseason and the first few games. I know though it is a long season so definitely I’m far from any panic button.
Orlando is a good young team and they deserved the W tonight. They will be a tough out in the playoffs.
If Scal isn’t hitting the 3 ball he is of no use against the biggest of the big. Please play Pollard in those situations.
Even in defeat, it felt great to see Rondo hitting those outside shots like a vet. I know he has the long arms, etc but it seemed like he had trouble staying in front of Nelson tonight and I’ve noticed that with some of the other points. As quick as he is, I believe he has to improve that phase of his game if we are going to play the lock down D.
by bceltfan on Nov 18, 2007 10:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dammit I hate it when Richard Jefferson is right…. ;)
by Hillcrestwildcat on Nov 18, 2007 10:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thank you for the excellent recap. I was only able to catch one quick score tonight, at 60-41, so I figured blowout. I’m happy the C’s came back to make a game of it. You just can’t maintain the maniacal intensity and it has showed the last few games.
We know we’re good, now let’s find the rotation and ration the minutes. 53 wins is fine. Let’s not push it.
by Siggy on Nov 18, 2007 10:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This game was a ref job. I figure there must have been easily 15 points that the Celtics should have had or the Magic shouldn’t have in the first quarter alone from fouls that were falsely called or not called, and probably 15 more throughout the rest of the game.
However the worst thing was at the end of the game, the ball goes out right off of the arm of a Magic player, and anyone who was watching the play could see it roll right off his arm like he was trying to do a Globetrotters move and forget to catch the ball, and it was somehow Magic ball. That blown call was the only one that mattered.
I am pretty pissed off about that ref job in general, but it was a hell of a game.
by fps_dean on Nov 18, 2007 11:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Terrible Refs Terrible Shot Selection Poor Bench Rotation Talented Magic team with more energy = Loss.
by Master Po on Nov 18, 2007 11:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If I could offer a quick suggestion:
Try breaking up your writing into more paragraphs. Big blocks of text doesn’t work journalistically, especially online.
Also, try using the jump feature so that only the lede and a few more grafs are visible on the main page without clicking to read more.
by FierceLikePaulPierce on Nov 19, 2007 12:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice Recap….
Some things:
Allen is still not over the mental part of the injury :(
Hats off to pollard who made the most of his minutes
Hedo killed us…
by CelticDynasty on Nov 19, 2007 12:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
fps: I also remember thinking that it was clearly off the Orlando player’s hand or arm…….unbelievable call. They didn’t replay it but it seemed so obvious.
by Celtic Steve on Nov 19, 2007 1:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
win ugly- lose ugly. the magic are a good team. lewis is a stud. nelson can penetrate. hedo can shoot. howard is abeast. at least we made a game of it and could have won. it’s not a bad loss. ray is looking vulnerable. tony is limited physically- i don’t think it is a mental thing. rondo needs to play face up d better, but he is proving he has a shot. his not shooting in the 4th is mental. we need to run plays at the end. pp made a good pass to tony near the end and he missed the bunny. it was a good play. thr refs have been brutal- stern needs to do something.
by nazzbo on Nov 19, 2007 7:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree the officiating is worse now than the last couple of years which is just hard to imagine. I was stuck watching the Orlando broadcast on NBA TV since I don’t live in the Boston area. During the first half, my son looked at me as one of the Celtics got shoved out of bounds rebounding without a foul called, and said “why does the guy keep saying we’re mauling them? They’re up by _ and they’re getting all the calls…” He’s eleven. look of pride
by BleedinGreen417 on Nov 19, 2007 8:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
If you want to help and inferior team beat a superior team, inconsistent officiating— which almost always favors the inferior team— is the best way to do it. It’s almost impossible to play well when you don’t know what’s a foul and what isn’t, particularly when the refs swallow the whistle when the other team does the same thing.
I had to turn last night’s game off. It was a travesty. It was not basketball.
It’s also apparent that the NBA has annointed Dwight Howard as one of the untouchable stars (along with the likes of Dwayne Wade and LeBron James) around which the league will build its marketing campaign. If Kendrick Perkins had been shoving people around and throwing elbows the way Howard was last night, he would have had at least two flagrants. Howard didn’t even get whistled. They also gave him a block on a play I thought was a goaltend, allowed him to shuffle his feet almost every time he caught the ball, and let him camp out in the lane without a single offensive three second call.
by Brickowski on Nov 19, 2007 11:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It was a tough game all around, tough loss.
You ask David Stern what he thought of the officiating and he’d say it was fine.
by mcpu40 on Nov 19, 2007 12:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
FierceLikePaulPierce:
What are you talking about? The post has about 15 separate paragraphs of a few sentences each. That’s plenty.
And there are exactly two paragraphs on the main page before the jump, which is pretty standard stuff.
It’s one thing to be a know-it-all. It’s another to be a dead wrong know-it-all.
by bigyaz on Nov 19, 2007 12:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Celtic Steve: They did replay it actually and the replay confirmed. I remember Tommy saying “…and they somehow call it Magic ball”
The terrible first half and bad turnovers really killed the Celtics despite the refjob though, but what I saw in the second half was very promising.
And we do need another big guy to foul Dwight Howard because he is such a terrible free throw shooter, and he should have had two or three more technicals then he did… but that is how I’d deal with him.
by fps_dean on Nov 19, 2007 3:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Brickowski I disagree. I think inconsistent officiating bothers the worse team more, normally because they are less experienced and let their emotions go.
Maybe we are more open to that since we haven’t played together long …
but as a generalization I think the superior team benefits more.
by Who on Nov 19, 2007 5:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
“Brickowski I disagree. I think inconsistent officiating bothers the worse team more, normally because they are less experienced and let their emotions go.”
Uhh, not if they are the ones benefitting from almost every call.
by ucn33 on Nov 19, 2007 7:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
bigyaz -
To be fair, one of the site editors (not sure who) changed the rticle from about 5-6 paragraphs to 15 and made the jump (it used to be all on the front page) after FierceLikePaulPierce’s comments (not sure if coincidence or cause). The jump aspect is certainly fine, especially after the first night.
The paragraph length? Kind of reminds me of the joke attributed to Yogi Berra when asked whether he would like his pizza cut into 8 slices or 6, Yogi replies “Eight, I’m really hungry.” I mean it’s the same amount of words and reading whther it’s 12 paragraphs or fine.
All kidding aside, FierceLikePaulPierce’s comments are clearly reflective of mainstream journalism and most prose writing, and, thus, may have some validity. Clearly the editor agreed. I also recognize that if an entire article was one paragraph (although, unsurprisingly, I am a fan of James Joyce who who wrote an entire chapter of Ulysses as one sentence) it would be unrelenting, and that pieces of journalism (which the Blog world sometimes follows) use very brief paragraphs (although I see it opposite from FierceLikePaulPierce,I think it is more important in newspapers because of the column structure than it is on a blog). But how long in writing generally is too long is a matter of preference. There are many high end magazine/journals (like say the Atlantic Monthly) that sometimes have articles with very long and dense paragraphs.
I think it goes back to what the purpose of paragraph breaks are, which is why are you deeming that paragraph content as inter-related, which for Petula and I, partially driven by the fact that we write as the game progresses in order to get something up as quickly as possible and partly because of a convention we adopted, is to treat each quarter as a unit of action and character, thus as a single paragraph. I actually think breaking it up as was down above, without using bolded sub-headings (which we would have put in had we known it was going to be edited as such) or rewriting to reflect the breaks, makes the game flow somewhat harder to follow because the reader needs to attend more carefully to quarter ends. But to each his own.
Hank
by hankfinkel on Nov 20, 2007 8:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















