Bobcats are Tough, Ray is Tougher
Boston and Charlotte met tonight in a game that turned out to be closer than anyone would have expected. Boston came into tonight’s game with a record of 10-1, while Charlotte’s was 6-6. Both teams were on the second game of back-to-backs, and their previous games could not have been more different. While the Celtics easily dominated the Lakers on Friday night, the Bobcats fell to the surging Orlando Magic. The Bobcats’ Gerald Wallace was injured during that game and, despite a reportedly clean MRI this afternoon, was pulled from tonight’s lineup just before game time. For the ever-superstitious Boston fan, these facts all added up to one thing: trouble.
First Quarter
The Bobcats came out feisty and grabbed an early lead sparked by the strong play of Boston College alum Jared Dudley. This was Dudley’s first NBA start, and he took full advantage of the opportunity. Dudley made Charlotte’s first two baskets and was in the middle of almost every play. Raymond Felton also had a strong showing, using his strength to overpower Rondo and get to the hoop, to finish or dish, almost at will.
The Charlotte crowd responded to their team’s strong start with an intensity that could only be described as tepid. When the prefabricated public address announcer boomed "De-Fense" partway through the quarter, his call was met with silence. The Celtics unfortunately seemed to be mirroring the energy of the Bobcat crowd, rather than that of the Bobcats. Their play in the first quarter was downright lethargic.
Despite the Celtics’ lifeless performance (possibly influenced by their travel delay and 3am arrival in Charlotte), they did just enough on the offensive end to keep pace with the Bobcats. Kevin Garnett led the team with six points, followed by Ray Allen’s four. The Celtics ended the first quarter deadlocked at 23.
Second Quarter
Given the relatively lifeless play of the starters, it is perhaps unsurprising that Doc Rivers chose to start a complete second unit (i.e., sans Pierce, Ray Allen or Garnett) in the second quarter. The Celtics bench played competently, with a deliberate effectiveness. If an NBA bench’s oath starts "first, do no harm", then mission accomplished. At the eight minute mark Pierce and Garnett re-entered the game (Rondo shortly followed suit) with the Celtics sporting a 31-30 lead.
After a shaky couple of minutes in which the C’s slipped 37-31, Rivers called a timeout and brought Ray Allen and Kendrick Perkins back into the game. A wide open three by Raymond Felton brought the Bobcats’ lead to nine, but Garnett’s loud put back after his own miss and subsequent foul shot cut it to six. Pierce’s physical power-it-to-the-hoop game then kept the score close for the next several minutes.
Toward the end of the quarter, the Celtics had a nice 9-0 run to grab the lead. Unfortunately, the Celtics’ intensity waned once again in the final minute of the half, and the Bobcats leapt to fill the void, taking a 53-48 lead. Even the Charlotte crowd seemed interested in this development.
Third Quarter
The Celtics’ dispassionate performance continued in the third quarter, with Pierce and Garnett doing just enough to keep the game close. Rondo seemed to be the only player with a spark tonight, harassing Felton and the other Bobcats on the defensive end. Meanwhile, Ray Allen struggled mightily with his shot, ending the quarter 3-12 from the field, including 0-4 from three. The Bobcats, on the other hand, were counterpunching effectively, with Emeka Okafor shining early in the quarter and Felton late.
Given the recent history of the Celtic franchise, one could be forgiven for starting to worry that the Celtics didn’t quite have this game in hand. Nonetheless, we waited patiently for the C’s to kick into gear and pull away in the fourth from a clearly outclassed team. Up to this point, the Celtics had expended just enough energy to keep the game close, but not enough to pull away. They nudged ahead 76-75 at the end of the third on a James Posey three-pointer.
Fourth Quarter
In the fourth quarter, the pattern of punch and counterpunch continued: Matt Carroll opened the quarter by hitting a deep three; Allen missed a jumper but followed it up a moment later with two made free throws; Carroll immediately drilled another jumper, and so on. Following a time-out three minutes in, Pierce nailed a three from the top. Shortly thereafter, Garnett gathered a feed from Pierce and slammed it. Next Posey drained a three and the Celtics assumed the lead, 88-87.
The knockout punch seemed imminent. However, the Bobcats did not get the memo and continued to play with fire. A wild buzzer-beating 22-foot bank shot from Richardson pushed the Bobcats ahead 90-89. Even the troubled Ghost of Jeff McInnis was contributing, at least until he incurred an uncontested ten second call while bringing the ball up court with under two minutes left.
Down by two with 50 seconds left, Pierce (stop us if you’ve heard this one before) pulled up for a three from the top of the key that grabbed iron but not the lead. The Celtics forced a 24 second violation, which left them with 16.6 seconds on the clock. They moved the ball clumsily around the perimeter, narrowly avoiding a turnover, and Pierce missed an ugly fallaway from the foul line.
The Celtics followed the Pierce miss with an intentional foul, but because they were not in penalty, Charlotte had to inbound the ball. We began to compose lines about the one that got away, and hoped that the Celtics will have learned a lesson tonight.
But……..
In a moment fit to be narrated by the heavenly lungs of Johnny Most: "House steals the ball!" Eddie House deflected the inbound pass to Pierce, who tipped it to an open Ray Allen, who set from three and got nothing…..but…..net. Final score: Celtics 96-95 over the Bobcats.
Perhaps learning lessons is overrated. Winning games at the buzzer is clearly not.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
I’m bummed I missed this one, just caught the highlights on nba.com. Great hands Eddie, pass Paul and jumper Ray. 11-1!
by Green17 on Nov 24, 2007 11:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ray is NOT HOT right now, hes simply Clutch baby!
by munjman on Nov 25, 2007 12:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
If we don’t bring our A game, we better bring our lunch pails.
by bceltfan on Nov 25, 2007 12:44 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nothing against the authors, but what’s the point of re-hashing in such length each and every game?
by lemonadesky on Nov 25, 2007 12:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
lemonadesky – Why does any Globe or Herald beat writer write a game story that describes the action (in nearly the same length)? The point of this is that, for those who missed the game particularly, they have some game story that, in many cases, goes up before even some of the other sites have theres up. I imagine it could be shorter, but for the average reader I imagine it takes 3-5 minutes to read which does not seem like heavy lifting. But certainly for those who have seen the game and/or dont like to read for that long, don’t waste your time. I’m sure there are threads to suit your needs better or shorter pieces that will suit you. CelticsBlog has a lot of content, pick what suits you, ignore the rest. I think the site tries to provide content for a lot of different tastes.
by hankfinkel on Nov 25, 2007 1:15 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hankfinkel — agreed. I was at work for this one, thanks to you and Petula for the recap!!
by sbm8196 on Nov 25, 2007 2:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
To Petula and Hankfinkel,
I am one of those who do not have access to the games and I appreciate your
efforts to detail what happened. It’s exactly what I’m looking for and is
far more thorough and timely than what I get from the newspapers, especially
with regards to the information I care about, i.e., the evolution of the game
and an accurate barometer of the players’ performance. Thanks again for your
efforts and I look forward to more reports.
by KelticFan on Nov 25, 2007 2:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
…just dont undestand Lemonadesky´s words…
…Petula, Hankfinkel…great job…we apreciate it…
…go celts!!!!!!!!…
by Amem on Nov 25, 2007 5:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
People like me depend on these indepth articles to stay on top of games. I travel a lot – I am currently on a business trip to Ghana and my internet connection is not that great, so these recaps are very important to me. My only regret is that the article wasn’t long enough.
I think those of us who enjoy thse articles need to speak up more and show appreciation for the good work the authors on Celticsblog do. This blog loads faster in my browser than Boston.com or ESPN. And the reporting here is much better – sort of like home cooking vs. McDonalds. Good job guys.
by The Village Idiot on Nov 25, 2007 6:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Please continue to give us the in depth coverage that is among the best on the NBA and the Celtics in particular.
by tapper on Nov 25, 2007 7:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice job fellas, I didnt get to see this one. As to other sources of game news. Beat writers are boobs with an agenda, I trust you guys a lot more. You are bloggers with an agenda…. similar to mine. 8)
by billysan on Nov 25, 2007 8:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hankfinkel – It is true that the Globe and Herald writers provide game stories of approximately the same length, which is where I go for my post-game stories (the Globe anyway, not so much the Herald). I didn’t intend to demean your efforts. Apparently, many bloggers have an agenda towards the daily writers and prefer blog stories and content. Personally, I don’t understand it, but then I think Peter May is a very good writer as are Spears, Shringer and Ryan from the Globe staff. The Herald writers aren’t as good, in my opinion, but they’re not that bad either. If this site wishes to provide similar content, well that’s freedom of the press, sort of.
What I do take issue with has nothing to do with your game stories. It’s the idea that many seem to have on this blog that somehow those offering opinions and articles here are more plugged-in than the daily newspaper writers, who are either lazy, old, apathetic or out of touch. No matter how much we all like to think we know the game of basketball and have a handle on what goes on around the NBA, it’s just not the case in comparison to those who do it for a living. A huge difference between the dailies and blogs is that newspaper stories often contain actual quotes from the players, coaches and GMs. Bloggers tend to “borrow” these quotes for their own use. Without this direct line to the people involved in basketball and the games, any piece becomes simply observation and opinion. Not the same thing at all.
Bloggers also have the advantage of hiding behind phony names (like lemonadesky), thus avoiding personal criticism.
Anyway, to each his or her own as the cliche goes. I did not mean to insinuate that your writing was not good. If some people find it useful to read, that’s fine. This country has something for everyone. That’s why there are a gazillion television channels and a myspace.com.
by lemonadesky on Nov 25, 2007 9:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m pressed for time, so I’m glad there are worthwhile write-up’s on this blog, which is where I go first for Celtics news. And I’ll add, quotes from coaches and players are usually of dubious value. So thank you Petula and Hankfinkel, regardless of whatever you’re real names might be.
by no kidding on Nov 25, 2007 9:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Petula/Hankfinkel great job on the recap…it was kinda long though…could you shorten it up..because as a member of this blog I really don’t really want to know specifics…I also don’t need to know how the bench played…quarter scores, who cares…and the set up describing the last 4.7 seconds of the game, not really needed…and to do so with superior writing is beyond me..other than that it was O.K….Fastbreak (it’s my real name)
by Fastbreak on Nov 25, 2007 10:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
the way to really know something is to use all the senses- do something, see something, read about it, write about it,etc. we live in a throw away society where people forget that they have choices as to how much depth they can pursue in their interests. i am grateful for this blog to give me and others a chance to experience a good time.
by nazzbo on Nov 25, 2007 11:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks a lot for the recaps. Please, don’t change a thing. I don’t get FSNE or NESN, and ESPN does a horrible job of recapping the games. Your recaps and the NBA.com highlights are all I have. Thanks so much for the work you guys do.
by farringa on Nov 25, 2007 11:20 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t have the NBA League Pass or ESPN News. I really enjoyed the recap, the descriptions, everything. Keep them coming please.
by lrrylegend1976 on Nov 25, 2007 11:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Also wanted to add my 2 cents and thank Petula/Hankfinkel for the great recaps. For me, your recaps bring the game to life in a way that the Globe/Herald recaps can’t quite capture. I especially love the humor. Please keep it up, as is.
by Cousin It on Nov 25, 2007 1:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
lemonadesky,
You’re right about the daily newspapers being worthwhile. But, for those of us fiends who just can’t get enough, I often read two or three game stories of games I just watched! It’s like listening to the CD of a live concert you went to. Even though watching the game is the best experience, each time I read a game story I appreciate some aspect of the game that I missed while watching it. I know, I know…I need to get a life.
by migit on Nov 25, 2007 4:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























