Pump Fakes And Finger Pointing
When did the Pistons deliver the knockout punch? Well, the play-by-play and the replays will tell you it came when Billups faked Tony Allen off his feet and drew a foul with 0.1 seconds left that sent him to the line for the tie-breaking and game-deciding free throws. But a big assist came moments earlier when the Pistons were exiting their timeout and Tayshaun Prince noticed that Tony Allen had checked back in as a defender.
Chauncey Billups earns his trip to the winning free throws with a pump fake.
"Tay told Chauncey to give Tony Allen a pump fake because Tony was just coming in off the bench cold," Pistons coach Flip Saunders said.Billups confirmed the story, saying Prince gave the same message to Richard Hamilton knowing that one of the two was going to end up with the ball in his hands for the final shot.
"Anybody could have went for that [fake]," Garnett said afterward, cautioning everyone not to single out Tony Allen for blame. "This was a good game for us to learn from and dissect. We wanted to measure where we were, and like Paul said, I'd rather deal with [a loss] now than later. No one said this was going to be easy, and we just have to go through this type of process and learn from it."
But the part that scares me a little bit is the talk of finger pointing after the game (from the Globe):
"It was very odd. It kind of felt like the end of the world," Celtics center Kendrick Perkins said. "It's a little different when we beat ourselves, you know what I'm saying? That's how I feel.
"It was a little dead [in the locker room]. It was the first game where I saw that guys were a little disappointed at each other. There was a lot of pointing fingers tonight for some reason . . . But it was nothing serious. We each got to look ourselves in the mirror and see what we do right [and wrong]. The rest will take care of itself."
I've said time and time again, the true character of this team will emerge when the finally have to face adversity. They had better put a clamp on that finger pointing and get back to the ubuntu quickly, or all this early season success will be for naught.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Err… that’s no good. Of course, if there was ever going to be finger pointing, last night’s game was it.
by Roy_Hobbs on Dec 20, 2007 7:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It was one game, if it continues after every loss then they have a problem.
by NoraG1 on Dec 20, 2007 7:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Meh, finger pointing is good… as in I really doubt that what they were doing was finger pointing as in “you’re the one responsible for this loss”. I’m sure everyone was replaying the game in their minds and were keeping each other in check on what each of them were doing wrong and what they need to improve on. This is a non issue.
by BudweiserCeltic on Dec 20, 2007 7:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
they should finger point at the refs, they were treating Chauncey like he
was Jordan. pp was getting hammered underneath , he got called for two traveling calls in the 2nd half which didnt exist. rondo was called for every littlething he did ,and even fouls that werent committed on billups.
And billups had a two handed wind up push of rondo were rondo slid head first
out of bounds and the ref was 3 ft away and was stearing right at billups but wouldnt call something against billups. its easy to win when you have a 6th teammate on the floor , they even called one of pp baskets away for no reason
by perk on Dec 20, 2007 7:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The game was lost early in the 3rd quarter. The Cs could have
pushed the lead up to 13 or 15 if they had made makeable shots
while Det was missing theirs. But Heinsohn continures to note
that the closer the game is the slower the Cs play. This has been a hallmark of the Rivers regime.
by Greg37 on Dec 20, 2007 8:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i only saw the last 5 minutes. sure, tony made a boo boo, but that was one big learning experience for him. i remember watching the world tournament or maybe the olympics, and seeing tim duncan make a few stupid, costly fouls in a losing effort. it’s what you walk away with.i.e. adversity makes the man. but in that last 5 mins. the td north garden was rocking.
by nazzbo on Dec 20, 2007 8:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i hope someone was pointing to perk and letting hom know he needs to start finishing when he gets the ball 3’ from the rim….
1-7 in the paint, stripped twice and blocked twice….
by lefty12 on Dec 20, 2007 8:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think the finger pointing comment was more about guys yelling at Perk for somethings during the game than it was about team wide finger pointing.
I was not a fan of Sheridian’s article. I don’t like the angle that losing is good for the team humility, blahblah, lessons, etc. If Pierce had put down that jumper (or if Ray had just passed to KG at the top of the key instead) we’d be having a much different conversation this morning.
by Green17 on Dec 20, 2007 8:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
That is what it seemed like to me to Green17, somebody rightfully said Perkins needed to do better etc. And Perkins got upset about it. He was the only one making a comment about it. Teammates should call each other out on occasion when they know they did not put their best effort in.
by NoraG1 on Dec 20, 2007 8:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
tony made a boo boo, but that was one big learning experience for him
That assumes that Tony is smart enough to learn. Doc said that he warned the players repeatedly about Chauncey’s pump fake; I guess it didn’t sink in with Tony, the second dumbest player in the NBA.
by Roy_Hobbs on Dec 20, 2007 8:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
As this season progresses, I expect Perkins will become a better finisher in the paint. Like many of the younger guys, this is his first season of playing in meaningful NBA games. He’ll settle down a bit.
My real concern, and it’s an old one around here, is the lack of an experienced point guard behind Rondo. Last night’s game turned in the third quarter when he was out and House and Ray Allen couldn’t cope with the defensive pressure of Lindsay Hunter.
Ainge has to go get someone. Fortunately, they won’t have to be a scorer. Just a competent ball-handler. (And no, Gabe Pruitt isn’t the answer)
by no kidding on Dec 20, 2007 8:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m still upset they lost…and if I was in that locker room, I’d probably be pointing fingers too.
Everyone is this morning, it’s natural.
WEEI callers are saying
(plenty of time to listen this morning during my 70-minute commute to work today, normally ½-hour)
Doc should’ve done this.
Paul should’ve done that.
Ray should’ve done this.
Rondo should’ve done that.
It’s all rubbish.
They lost due to inexperience, period.
A: They are 20-3 (maybe a bit lucky here and there but still, not too much wrong with that).
B, C, D, E & F: Chauncey was the difference maker
Thankfully this it’s early in the season and I believe they will learn from this.
by mcpu40 on Dec 20, 2007 8:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Finally somthing to consider…
IMO its alot easier to learn from a loss as the lesson is a lot more grounded/connected to negative consequences. My Questions:
Do you bring in a cold player for the last seconds of the game? 1
IS that good coaching?
I just don’t get why rondo isn’t getting any of the calls. Is it me – am i a homer?
Lets not say we need to bring someone in just to bring them in. This is one game.
PLUS notes:
Ray was feeling it
Rondo finishing strong
Lets run with it!
by TBreezy on Dec 20, 2007 8:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
mcpu40, I agree the loss was due mostly to inexperience, and that many of the Celtics will improve as the season goes on.
But… nothing is going turn Eddie House or anyone else on bench into a competent ball-handler when Rondo’s out. The need for a true back-up point guard has to be addressed. And I fully expect Ainge is working on that.
by no kidding on Dec 20, 2007 8:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Some positives: C’s led, were down late, stormed back and lost by a hair. Ray bounced back in a big way. With Rondo on the bench, the need for a playmaking PG against a vet team seemed obvious. They’ve got the roster slot, go get one Danny.
Negatives: Lots of missed layups, off night for Pierce, lots of missed FT’s and the C’s let the Pistons shoot almost 50% from the 3pt line. Fingerpointing? Well, they should get it out of their systems now. I’d circle 1/5 and make sure everyone is up and ready for that game.
by LuckyNumber07 on Dec 20, 2007 9:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
no kidding said:
… nothing is going turn Eddie House or anyone else on bench into a competent ball-handler when Rondo’s out. The need for a true back-up point guard has to be addressed. And I fully expect Ainge is working on that.
==
…agreed, i suppose…though competent is not quite the correct work.
House is competent, not above average…which is what they need.
It’s early in the season, we must accept the loss as fans.
The Celtics must learn from the loss and with Doc as their coach, I think they will.
He’s a good teacher.
Had Paul nailed that shot at the end, all would be right in the world.
He didn’t.
Bring on Chicago, C’s by 22.
by mcpu40 on Dec 20, 2007 9:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
what can one add that isn’t “finger pointing?” I am not sure, but things that happened last night in a loss that should be learned from because they also have happened many times this year include:
1. Doc brings in cold players late in the game who then make mistakes.
2. Perkins gets stripped or doesn’t finish well.
3. Pierce numbers look bad and he forces action late in the game and comes up with a mistake(turnover) or an untimely miss
4. Rondo picks up fouls that cause him to struggle defensively or be sat by Doc
5. Doc doesn’t bring a deep bench player back in in the 2nd half who played well early and if he does he brings him in at the very end of the game(see number 1).
6. Garnett, when on the post and having a mismatch, always, ALWAYS waits for the double or triple team to make a move, instead of going to the basket immediately when getting the ball.
thats about it. And I mean those are constructive things if they were to change
by wahz on Dec 20, 2007 9:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This paragraph from ESPN.com today, sums it up nicely…this thread is now done:
There are at least a dozen different reasons why the Detroit Pistons were able to eke out an 87-85 victory over Boston on Wednesday night in what was easily one of the most competitive, riveting and intense games we’ve ever seen played in mid-December, but all those reasons begin to boil down to the same common denominators: experience, savvy and depth.
by mcpu40 on Dec 20, 2007 9:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The sky isn’t falling. Many of the players played poorly last night. They put too much pressure on themselves. If Paul has an average night, we win. If the free throw shooting is average, we win. If the Cs don’t let the Pistons dictate the tempo, we win. If Perk plays normally, we win. If Doc makes several better decisions, we win. If Eddie doesn’t keep dribbling into the corner, we win. If Detroit is cold from three point range, we win. Etc. Etc.
Lots of ifs. I don’t believe anything is needed with the roster. The guys put way too much pressure on themselves. That much was painfully obvious. The only thing that is a concern is that in close games, it all revolves around coaching decisions. A few poor decisions here and there in a close game ends up being a loss. It’s easy to be a good coach when you’re team is winning by large margins. Look at our last shot (or lack thereof) of each half. Those two things alone could have made the difference in the game.
by amenhotep04 on Dec 20, 2007 9:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
A thread is not over based on espn.com analysis. ;)
by NoraG1 on Dec 20, 2007 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hey Roy…have you ever spoken to Tony?..do you know him.?..had conversation with friends and family members ?..well then I am pointing my finger at you if you haven’t…he made a dumb play..but to question his intellect..that’s kinda low…
by Fastbreak on Dec 20, 2007 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Eddie HOuse is very competent. Who do you think was going to have it easy against the Pistons? Eddie nailed an ice-in-veins 3 when it was needed. Who do you want…Brevin Knight in there. Give me a break!
Tommy had it right. Pierce was guarding nobody but space at the end. They should have had the windmill D going on the inbounds pass.
Perkins looked like a 3rd stringer last night. I guess with Pierce on the last shot they were hoping for a foul because he was certainly not the hot man.
Tony Allen made a dumb play and that comes with Tony Allen (and the rest of the league probably knows it). Let’s look at the bright side. That was the highest he’s jumped all year.
Here’s the good news…we didn’t play that well, really, and took them to the end.
by Wildblu1 on Dec 20, 2007 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
hey, everyone on our team needs to learn how to pump fake. pierce should have used it on tayshaun all night and perk desperately needs to learn how to fake ( head, pump whatever) because he blew 2 layups last night . it’s like watching paint dry when perk goes up for a jam. clifford ray needs to teach him the McHale " keep your hands up" drill so that he never brings the ball down. perk, pierce and our entire bench played poorly last night. garnett, allen and rondo all did their job.
by Red2 on Dec 20, 2007 9:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wahz – absolutely great post. I agree to a degree with you. But I ain’t “pointing fingers” at a 20-3 record. The next two games at home should be telling on how well we bounce back from a loss. In the meantime, I am keeping my fingers in my pocket and crossed.
“A man may die from a hunger of the body. But whole nations have fallen from that of the spirit. Discipline. Discipline cures.”
“Does not the value lie in what one does with either [victory or defeat].”
by Master Po on Dec 20, 2007 9:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
A little adversity is a good thing for a new team. A two point loss, while being world’s different from a two-point win is nothing to pull your hair out over. To be out of the playoffs we’ll likely need at least 4 losses, something that hasn’t happened yet this season. I have always felt that it’s easy to do well when you’re doing well, what’s hard is to turn things around when things things aren’t going well. If there’s anything Doc can do, its keep these guys focused and looking forward, one has only to consider last years 18 game losing streak.
by GreenBalls on Dec 20, 2007 9:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It’s an ancient NBA adage that any team can beat any other team on any given night. It’s the basis of what makes these games exciting…Last year, one of the worst Celtics teams ever upended the mighty San Antonio Spurs which salvaged our dismal season…It happens; it’s that simple…Did that mean that last year’s C’s were ready for the NBA finals?…Hah! is the answer to that question.
Last night, a very good Detroit team squeaked by the Celtics on that given night. In retrospect, much can be said and a plethora of fingers can be pointed, but professionalism dictates that the loss be accepted with dignity and the tapes be run so that we can see clearly where we could have done better and where, hopefully, we will do better in the future.
All the rest is simply spilt milk spoiling loudly…
by BoundingRounder on Dec 20, 2007 10:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
If we’re pointing fingers…how about pointing it a Pierce. With 5.1 sec left…isn’t it a universal rule in basketball that you do two things??? You make sure you get a good shot and MAKE SURE YOU GET THE LAST SHOT. There is absolutely no reason to leave time on the clock for Detroit to get a decent look. Paul made the commitment to that shot too soon. Allen or Garnett should have had the ball anyways but that’s another subject!!! I am not upset about the loss. We are still learning to play together. This fingerpointing crap is what gets me mad. Especially when one of the most experienced players on our team made a stupid mistake.
That’s my rant…make it a happy day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by gizmo010101 on Dec 20, 2007 10:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
As poorly as PP played on the offensive end, he did play great defense on Prince. A number of things could have gone our way and the game could have been won. I’m mostly happy with the never say die attitude displayed by the team when the came back from down 6 with a minute and a half to play. The other end of game things will come with experience.
by galen on Dec 20, 2007 10:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
We should have won. Not to name names but several players did not have typical games. We are all disappointed but this was just one game.
by scndtony on Dec 20, 2007 11:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs





















