Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

The Good And Bad Of Paul Pierce

goodbad.jpg In my opinion, Paul Pierce is one of the top 25 players in the game.  He's the Celtic that has been here the longest and has carried the burden of this team's losing on his back.  He has embraced the Celtic traditions and desperately wants to be a winner worthy of that tradition.  I'm a big fan.  So why has he faced critics and trade rumors for most of his career?  Why isn't he considered one of the top 10 to 15 players?

The simplest answer is what fans like to call "Evil Paul."  As in a superhero's bad twin.  As in a split personality.  As in, most of the time we see a brilliant scorer, passer, rebounder, teammate, and even defender (Good Paul).  But every once in a while, we see a ball hogging, shot forcing, immature, non-defender (Evil Paul).

Good Paul is the guy that in years past would often lead his team in every statistical category.  He makes teammates better by driving to the hoop and passing off for easy layups.  He gets opponents into foul trouble and piles up points at the free throw line.  He runs off picks and keeps his head up.  He gets his teeth knocked out and keeps playing.  He's a gamer.

Evil Paul is the guy that dribbles the ball at the top of the key, bobbing his head, shaking his body left and right before cannonballing himself into triple coverage before either losing the ball or hoisting up a desperation heave that has a 10% chance of going in.  He walks the ball up the court when the team should be pushing the pace.  He jaws with opponents and refs when he could be focusing on helping his team.  He even sometimes acts immature to the point of hurting his team.

Read More

Star-divide

Years ago, just after Antoine left (for the first time) and Doc Rivers was introduced as coach, we saw Evil Paul quite a bit.  Sure he was our leading scorer and what games we did win were largely due to Pierce putting the team on his back and taking over the game.  But therein lies part of the problem.  Without a good team around him, he took the mentality that he had to do it all himself. 

It wasn't so much that he didn't trust his teammates (though that might have been part of it).  It was probably more along the lines of what Kobe Bryant thinks every time down the court.  "Why should I pass it when I know I have a better shot at scoring triple teamed than most of these guys do in single coverage?"

Pierce has grown up a whole lot in the last few years, and that is a huge credit to him and even to the coaching staff that has worked with him through the years.  We've seen Evil Paul come out less and less.  And now that Pierce has his "costars," we're seeing him less than ever.  But he still comes out every once in a while.

I don't know Paul personally, and I'm no psychologist, but I have watched him for his whole career and I have a pretty good guess as to why we see these different sides of Peirce.  I think he's just an emotional guy.  Plain and simple.

Look at guys like Duncan or even Ray Allen.  They are even keeled.  They give a consistent effort and get consistent results.  Allen's results fluctuate more because he's shooting from further away, but he's always Ray.  Neither Duncan nor Allen let anything take their focus away from what they do.

Pierce isn't like that at all.  He feeds off his emotion.  It gets him going and gives him that extra gear that sets him apart from the pack.  He likes feeding off the crowd or rising to a challenge or overcoming obstacles to seize the day.  He wants the high of victory and aches for it.

The flipside is that all that emotion left unbridled can do just as much harm as good, if not more.  Maybe some days talking trash with an opponent gets Paul motivated.  But some days, it just gets him distracted and perhaps even makes him forget the gameplan.  Sometimes Pierce will take a bad call from an official and let it motivate him to overcome.  Too often (especially in the past) his temper gets the best of him and he can't focus on anything but the bad call.  Or sometimes the flow of the game will impose its will upon Pierce instead of the other way around.

For instance, in the game against the Heat Pierce was brilliant in the first half.  He couldn't miss and he was the main reason why the team built a 28 point lead.  In the second half, the team seemed to let up.   Maybe it was the jetlag or maybe the team thought the Heat would roll over and die like the Knicks had a day earlier, but they visibly eased up on the Heat.  Things started going Miami's way.  Lose balls, rebounds, lucky rolls, everything that had happened for the Celtics in the first half started happening for the Heat.  This wasn't all Pierce's fault by a long shot, but the point is he fell right into it with everyone else.  Everything he tried looked forced and the ball stopped moving freely in the offense.

Contrast that with the game against Cleveland on Sunday.  Pierce only scored 7 points, I think he had a very solid game.  He was all over the court on defense (picking up 3 steals), he moved the ball, and he hustled for loose balls (earning a few Tommy Points).  He made a very positive impact on the game without having to score all the points.  Part of me wonders if could have done the same if LeBron was on the court yapping at him the whole game.  Would he still have taken only 7 shots, or would he have forced a few more in there?

Of course that is the beauty of having Garnett and Ray Allen on this team now.  Even if Evil Paul comes out once in a while, we don't need to rely on him anymore.  Some days Ray Allen will have the hot hand and take over a game.  Sometimes Garnett will take advantage of his natural mismatch over everyone in the league and simply dominate a game.  And more and more it seems that Pierce is able to recognize when he's not helping the team with his scoring and understands how to step back and let his teammates lead the charge.

A bonus benefit to those two is the influence they have on Pierce.  He can learn from watching Ray Allen's professionalism every day.  Or in at least one case we've heard about, Kevin Garnett has given Pierce advice on how to channel his energy.  Remember the pushup he did at the foul line?  We found out later that was all about a conversation with Garnett about doing whatever it takes to get the negative energy out of his system and channel it into something positive.  Pierce took his advice literally and instead of lashing out at the opponent or official, he did a pushup.

More and more we are seeing Paul Pierce mature and grow as a person and player.  There's always the chance that Evil Paul could make an appearance, and the greatest fear is that it will happen when we need Good Paul the most.  But with Garnett and Allen around, the hope is that those times will be rare and the team will be able to work through it together.

Pierce may never be considered one of the top 10 players in the game.  On the other hand, if he can keep control of his emotions and work with his teammates, he might be a big part of a team that could be the best in the league.  I'll take that any day and I think he would too.

Comment 45 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

nice piece as always.

by celticmaestro on Dec 3, 2007 6:41 AM EST reply actions  

you have just describe more than half the humans on planet earth with a dual personality but did a great job of describing Pierce on the court behaivor.
Without question Paul is at times emotional which could be good and bad depending on the situation, no problem for me most of the time.
My complaint with Pierce is his ego, he talks of himself as though he’s one of the great players in all of basketball history and that makes me look at him sideways.
Pierce is a good player most nights, he could be a better player if he didn’t play with as much ego and played with more determination that his team is more important than himself.
As you described his behavior when a game is close and he tries to put the load of winning upon his shoulders he usually loses that battle, because he refused to allow the team to work the ball for the best shot and insteads hogs the ball and forces the ball for a shot or a pass.
Now that Garnett and Ray Allen is on the team Pierce is going to learn something about humility, something he didn’t and couldn’t learn from Antoine Walker !
Pierce is also going to learn to play defense because Garnett and Posey plays serious defense and let me not forget Rondo and Tony Allen, while Ray Allen puts out constant effort all game long.
Pierce could end up have his best season of all because of the mindset of his other teammates ( Garnett, Allen, Posey, House, )
Pierce is best when he simply allows the ball to come to him withing the 15 – 20 ft range and he’s catching and shooting or cath and drive instead of dancing with the ball 25 out from the basket and nearly always turns the ball over.

by micah kenneth on Dec 3, 2007 7:07 AM EST reply actions  

i dont know about point gaurds or bigs, they are different and rating them against wings is tuff, but that aside pp is top 5 among wings, non-bigs and non points, only kobe is better, none of the wings rebound like him, none, he is the best rebounding none big in the league, unless you count marion but he plays the 4 and especially now with garnett getting any rebound available, forget that, he is hands down better than vince carter, d wayde, and even mcgrady, who might be a slightly better scorer, maybe, but from distance while pp gets down in the high % area far more often , and even lebron, only this year got better, only over the last 15 games, till then proved nothing, remember this guy, pp, is bigger and stronger that everybody else at his position, magette, deng, ginobli, etc., etc., he is a beast, like a power forward from 15 years ago, bigger than cornbread or magic. he is special and a top 10 player in my mind. kobe, duncan, nash, howard, kg, say c paul, and notwitzki (though i would disagree), then who, who else would you name above pp? even if i am forgetting 5 players that puts him top 15, this guy is the best c i have seen outside bird, and i am more happy for him than for us with this new fantasy team of ours. go paul pierce, go.
durant will be better, but he hasn’t done it yet. pp is the a special player, not only are we lucky to have him, but the game itself, the league, is seeing something unique and we should not underestimate that

by chicagogreen on Dec 3, 2007 7:33 AM EST reply actions  

You forget Lebron Lames

by Galiza Ceive on Dec 3, 2007 8:02 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t know, chicagogreen. I think Lebron has Paul beat, both in rebounding and overall.

by Roy_Hobbs on Dec 3, 2007 8:03 AM EST reply actions  

Evil Paul is the reason he has been called a ball-stopper in the past and had such trouble getting an second invitation to USA Basketball. I’ve never questioned his heart or devotion. I have questioned his decision-making on many occasions. I blame Rick Pitino and Jim O’Brien for encouraging his bad habits. I remember being totally disgusted with the Celtic offense during the famous battles with New Jersey in 2001-02. New Jersey would line up three or more defenders knowing Pierce would make the decision to take them all on rather than move the ball.

by BleedinGreen417 on Dec 3, 2007 8:04 AM EST reply actions  

That 50 point half down in the Meadowlands was the worst thing that could have happened to him. He was in the zone that day (another Sunday afternoon game if I remember correctly), but has never really duplicated it. It made him think he was invincible and could beat even a quadruple team.

At least this year he’s trying to play defense. So long as I can see energy on defense, I can excuse the offensive lapses, so long as they are only occasional. Aside from the turnovers, it really burns me when he just loafs un the floor.

by Brickowski on Dec 3, 2007 8:21 AM EST reply actions  

Two things:

A: I consider Paul to be in the top 12 players league-wide as I struggle to name 12 players better than him.

B: The Cleveland game would’ve been VERY different on many levels had King James played.

by mcpu40 on Dec 3, 2007 8:53 AM EST reply actions  

That 50 point half down in the Meadowlands was the worst thing that could have happened to him. He was in the zone that day (another Sunday afternoon game if I remember correctly), but has never really duplicated it. It made him think he was invincible and could beat even a quadruple team.

I understand what you’re saying, Brick, but at times, Pierce is as invincible as any player in the game.

During an 18 game stretch in 2005-06, Pierce had the following point totals: 40, 18, 37, 31, 35, 31, 50, 30, 20, 37, 39, 38, 31, 33, 31, 31, 24, 36. There are only a handful of players in the NBA who could put up numbers like that.

by Roy_Hobbs on Dec 3, 2007 9:01 AM EST reply actions  

Roy, I agree about Paul’s abilities. Kobe, LeBron and T-Mac (and he hasn’t done it nearly so much since he arrived in Houston) are the only active names I could recall without looking at team rosters that could post those kinds of numbers for that kind of stretch. Pierce is still pretty amazing. However, years of bad habits lead him right back into those old habits once again when things aren’t going well. I use the second halves at Miami and at Cleveland as evidence. Being able to create his own is a blessing and a curse…

by BleedinGreen417 on Dec 3, 2007 9:13 AM EST reply actions  

you’ve captured what has prevented Pierce from being regarded as a top 5 or top 10 player- his inconsistency and his immaturity. Like a lot of athletes who use anger and emotion to fuel their performance sometimes Paul is brilliant and sometimes he implodes. the one thing that I think is different with him this year is his committment to defense. He really seems to be trying there. But evil or bad paul is always lurking in the corner but the good news is that now Garnett and Allen are there to off set that. One could write a similar piece about Garnett and ask whether his intensity causes him to burn out by the playoffs? One of the raps on Garnett has always been that he can’t deliver in the post season. Right now I think the big 3 are tired. thankfully the bench is rounding into shape but I would still like to see Danny make a move for another player who can contribute. Tony Allen and Scal are pretty much useless at this point. Davis, House and Posey are the real deal

by Red2 on Dec 3, 2007 9:34 AM EST reply actions  

While I have been harsh on the guy, and deservedly so IMO, I think that the main reason that Paul has changed as a player isn’t K.G. or Ray, a better team, etc., it is Doc Rivers who changed him. Doc got Paul out of his routine of going 1 on 5, and got him to play a more efficient brand of basketball. When Doc first showed up here, Paul honestly hated the man’s guts. That much was obvious. Doc benched Paul when he didn’t follow the program, and he put constant pressure on him to change his ways behind the scenes. The result was a better player than what we saw before, even though the team was actually materially worse, talentwise, than it as before Doc showed up. In other words, Paul actually had more incentive than he previously had to continue with his ball hogging, but he actually turned the corner.

Doc, mind you, will still bench Paul when he needlessly reverts, as he did last week in the second quarter of one of the games. Paul was out there with the bench players, and was forcing like crazy. It was an increasingly rare “Bad Paul” sighting. Doc pulled Paul and put Ray out there, and things settled down quickly. The message was clear “Your teammates are doing what they are supposed to do, but you are not. You can have a seat now.” Paul needs this type of reminder, on occasion, to keep himself squared away. I think that he has learned enough to know that when Doc pulls him, it is because he deserved it. Doc certainly doesn’t have a quick trigger with Pierce, after all.

Good artice.

by MikeDfromNP on Dec 3, 2007 9:41 AM EST reply actions  

Paul has been getting after it defensively this year which is great to see. He can be pretty lazy coming up the floor but Tommy calls him the best offensive player the C’s have ever had and I think he means it.
At his position, I too struggle to name someone I’d rather have.
Now that he’s got a team around him, he’s going to have his best season yet. That still might only get them to the EC finals, but I’ll take it.

by reggie35 on Dec 3, 2007 9:41 AM EST reply actions  

Paul Pierce is definitely in the top elite of the league. He has not been considered so because of the C’s record these last years, but he truly is one of the best players in the league.

I love it when he gets mad at something and he gets like 10-12 points in a row…he’s an emotional guy, therefore sometimes you get the “Evil Paul”

by greenwise on Dec 3, 2007 9:51 AM EST reply actions  

Jeff, you nailed Pierce’s grating tendencies. The end of game Paul Pierce iso’s did not work that often. But when they did the adrenoline was such that he wanted it every time. But the Charlotte pass to Ray (who couldn’t hit a barn up until the dagger)was this year’s better Paul Pierce. Let’s cut his past tendencies some slack because while he doesn’t have Ray’s smooth or KG’s passion, he is tough. TOUGH! And we need that. He has to be the NBA’s happiest player right now. He didn’t move, take a pay cut, lose stature, had to watch the ping-pong balls too and now is surrounded by a championship-potential nucleus.
For all you Scalabrine bashers, it looks like his minutes have been earned by Big Baby. House and Posey are big time contributors. Tony Allen an intriguing talent and Pollard for role playing. Rondo and Perk playing their roles well. Gotta love it!

by Wildblu1 on Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM EST reply actions  

Excellent article and insight. That is what makes this site the BEST on the internet. Those guys at espn.com could learn from you guys.

by scndtony on Dec 3, 2007 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

Let’s not get carried away here.

This “Evil Paul” comes out for 5-10 games out of the past 3 or 4 years.

Paul is a HOF player and has consistently put up great numbers playing multiple positions for the vast majority of his career in the toughest town to play in…in all of sports.

And we can’t blame Paul for being super talented and trying to win games on his own….you have to blame all the great players before him who’ve tried to carry teams on their backs throughout history. All Paul is trying to do is emulate the Jordan’s, Russell’s, Bird’s, Johnson’s, etc. to help his team win.

Problem is Paul has never had the co-stars or cast of players and coaches that these great ones had…..and thus you get more chances of natural mistakes and emotional frustrations….and of course losing games.

Bottomline is don’t forget that “Good” Paul has been through bad times (Pitino Era) and good times (O’brien Era) to horrific times (past 4 years) to now. From being an organizational draft pick, to not making the playoffs early on, to almost dying in a club, to bring the C’s back to the playoffs and relevancy, to being back as a laughing stock, to now…..he’s stuck with us and endure the numerous and retarded Trade talks and rumors for quite some time.

Paul is a great player and I’m extremely proud he’s a Celtic.

by TheReaLPuba on Dec 3, 2007 10:46 AM EST reply actions  

That is a great article and very well written. You really captured Paul Pierce. I akin his dual personality to artists with bipolar disorder. They have their ups and downs, has trouble maintaining an even keel, but are incredibly brilliant and creative moreso than most people. I think the emotion of KG and the steadiness of Allen compliment both of his sides and helps him maintain a balance that he didn’t have before. This accompanied by a coach who is understanding of him and has experience dealing with him and channeling his energy can only mean good things. I think KG is right we will see even more great things come from him this year. Here’s to hoping evil Pierce goes on vacation this year, lol.

by Rabs on Dec 3, 2007 11:01 AM EST reply actions  

At his position, I too struggle to name someone I’d rather have.

I don’t. Let’s start with LeBron James, and go from there to Kobe Bryant and TMac. And Caron Butler is right up there, although not quite the equal of Pierce.

Again, so long as he plays defense and doesn’t turn it over too much I can excuse his other flaws. This team doesn’t need his scoring nearly as much as in prior years.

by Brickowski on Dec 3, 2007 11:20 AM EST reply actions  

Lebron, sure, who wouldn’t want Lebron.

Kobe? Please. No. The guys is a cancer, his attitude is worse than Pierce and his ego could never handle being with anyone who might challenge him for the spotlight. Is he more talented? Absolutley. Is he a better player? Sure, no question. Considering everything else “Kobe” that you have to deal with there is no way you want Bryant on your team.

TMac? Good, sure, but you want to talk about being soft on D, a crybaby in the lockerroom, and a guy who only relies on emotion to play . . .TMac is w-a-y worse than Pierce when it comes to being inconsistent and coping a primadonna attitude. Let’s not even touch the injury issues with TMac vs PP.

Butler is nowhere near Pierce. Butler is probably even more inconsistent and not nearly as capable as Paul of coming up big in the crunch.

I understand your frustration with Pierce, but your list of “players I’d want other than Pierce,” (other than Lebron) isn’t supporting your answer for addressing the problem (in either the real world or a fantasy one).

No player is perfect, they all have their warts, PP is no exception. The key is to find a way to win with those warts anyway, which is what the Celtics have been doing of late. It is possible that exposure to Garnett and Allen will rub off on PP and we will see a marked maturation in him as the next two-three seasons unfold.

by tmcdon on Dec 3, 2007 11:34 AM EST reply actions  

To carry a team, one player must able to completely and utterly exploit the opponent’s weakness(es). When Paul scored 48(?) in th4e second half against New Jersey, he exploited their weaknesses BUT they didn’t allow him to do it again. They loaded up three defenders and dared him to drive through them. Either way, they forced him into a bad shot or a turnover. As a testament to his talent, he made A LOT of tough shots. In the recent games that we’ve seen the “evil Paul”, he was not exploiting the weaknesses of the defense by taking ill-advised shots. Doc benched him as a consequence. I’m just thankful that we have multiple options when one isn’t working.

…he is tough. TOUGH![/quote]For as many times as he’s had his teeth knocked out in the line of duty and still takes it to the hole, he will always have my respect.
[quote]And Caron Butler is right up there, although not quite the equal of Pierce.

Caron Butler only wishes he were half as talented as Paul Pierce.

by BleedinGreen417 on Dec 3, 2007 11:44 AM EST reply actions  

Caron Butler has really come into his own this year. He’s averaging 23 ppg on 52% shooting and he’s a better defender and more athletic than Pierce. Butler is also shooting nearly 90% from the line, with 6.7 rebounds per game and 3.6 assists per game. All of these numbers are better than Pierce’s numbers except for the assists (Pierce is averaging 4.8), in large measure because Butler doesn’t have nearly so many guys to pass it to.

You don’t want Kobe because he’s a crybaby? As for me, so long as he scores 28 ppg and plays outstanding defense he can cry as much as he wants. Go over to RealGM and propose a trade of Kobe for Pierce straight up and see what everyone says.

by Brickowski on Dec 3, 2007 12:08 PM EST reply actions  

I’ve seen a different Pierce this year, but you can’t expect him to lose all of his bad habits in a month of games.

I also have no doubt Garnett, RAllen & Posey will be all over him if he makes bonehead plays at crucial moments. He hasn’t been accountable to anyone but Doc in the past few years. That’s definitely changed this season. He has vets with a common goal to answer to now. They won’t stand for poor play.

by LuckyNumber07 on Dec 3, 2007 12:11 PM EST reply actions  

Nice piece, Jeff. FWIW I think PP really upped his maturity quotient starting in the 2005-06 season. Beginning that year, he was much steadier, more team-oriented, etc.

The chemistry among the Three Amigos is really starting to come along. I wouldn’t monkey with that for anyone except Kobe or LBJ. Caron Butler? You gotta be kidding!

by Eeyore III on Dec 3, 2007 12:24 PM EST reply actions  

I think the Evil-Good dichotomy used to describe players is lazy and inflammatory. It feeds into an all or nothing attitude that really doesn’t jive with reality. It’s not a matter of getting one or the other, because there’s only one player out there to get. Suffice it to say, Pierce like every other player on the Celtics roster has flaws.

The article only mentions this in passing, but I think MikeD hit it: coaching is why we’ve seen a more balanced Pierce. When O’Brien was here they didn’t practice offense, and Pierce has said as much. It was the Paul and Toine show and that was how they did things. It’s not really surprising that he looks better now that he has a coach that doesn’t expect him to chuck it up every time.

I just wonder if with time, we will have an “Evil KG” (you know the guy who passes up point blank shots without looking at the rim to hit semi-open 3-pt shooters) and the “Evil Ray” (who looks a lot like “Evil Paul” with a better post game interview).

by Berkcelt on Dec 3, 2007 12:37 PM EST reply actions  

If we’re rating Small Forward Pierce is number 2. We all know who’s #1. The list, IMO, would go.

  1. Lebron
  2. Pierce
  3. Carmelo
  4. Marion
  5. Howard/Butler

Lebron we know why he’s number 1. Carmelo is number 3 because he doesn’t rebound or pass like Pierce, and he can’t create for himself quite as well, not to mention his limited range. Marion is 5th because he’s a 3rd option at best on a good team, and more of a super garbage man. The 5th spot is really between Butler and Howard.

by ManUp on Dec 3, 2007 12:52 PM EST reply actions  

I wouldn’t argue that Kobe is an all out better player than Pierce. As much as I like Lebron and think he’s great, I think he still has yet to surpass Kobe as the best player on the planet. In fact, if I were down 2pts with 3 sec left on the clock and had one guy to take the shot there is no doubt I would want him taking it.

However, Kobe is an awful teammate. He’s poison to his team and is one who will gladly, and publicly, point the finger at everyone else for the failures of his team (justified or not)and assume none of the repsonsibility himself. He will blame others for failure and not himself. He is one of the poorest examples of player leadership I have ever seen (his oncourt intensity and hustle is never in question, but his selfish play and cold condescention to his teammates does quite a bit to negatively balance his overall example). His character is of the type that you would want on your team (certainly not a Celtic’s squad).

You’ll get no argument that Kobe is by far a better player than PP, but would I put him on this team? No. Not for a moment.

Caron Butler, no, sorry. Good player, would nice to see him on the C’s, but not at the expense of Pierce.

When I watch Pierce and get frustrated with his sometimes bonehead play (especially his hold-the-ball-for-the-last-20secons-to-jack-it-up-from-15ft-at-the-last-second-crap-only-to-miss-badly)it does two things:
1. It breeds in me a sense of hope that eventually (esp on this team) he’s going to learn and you’ll see more Ray Allen taking that shot (which was cool to see Pierce hit Allen in Toronto rather than jack it up himself, because he was playing be reflex and not thinking about it). That one day we’re gonna see him do the unexpected and “hit Ker at the top of the key” (Jordan was w-a-y older than Pierce when he FINALLY learned that).
2. It makes me really appreciate that I got to watch Bird, Magic, Jordan, Doc, play all those times. As good as Pierce is individually, as great as Kobe and Lebron are at times, those other guys rarely, if ever, missed in the crunch or they simply made a great pass which was just as great. The media, the fans, are always looking for the next “great one” or the next “special player,” and to see exceptional athletes like PP, Kobe, and Lebron not measure up to them, well, only makes the memories of those guys even sweeter.

by tmcdon on Dec 3, 2007 12:54 PM EST reply actions  

Caron Butler is a better player than Carmello, who is a chucker and doesn’t play much defense.

by Brickowski on Dec 3, 2007 1:01 PM EST reply actions  

excellent piece and i think you nailed it. he’s very emotional and when he gets to being bad paul he needs to come out of the game. not as a punishment- but as a time out cool off time. i think doc is aware of his tendencies and has helped him but is not always quick on the trigger to cool him off.the one guy who has all the talent to be up at the top but his egomania and "psycho " and crappy attitude take it away is ron artest. he is one of the all time should have beens.

by nazzbo on Dec 3, 2007 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

I suspect -uh I know that Paul has had bad habits to shake due to the lack of talent surrounding him. I honestly thought he had to be traded so the kids could really develop. When he went down – Tony Allen carried the Celtics. When Tony went down – nobody Jefferson included could carry the Celtics. Now, the Celtics traded for Allen and Garnett and the three are winning as well as learning to play together. The Celtics do have a shot to do something very special in 2008.

by QuinielaBox on Dec 3, 2007 1:28 PM EST reply actions  

If we win a title it will be because Paul Pierce led us to it. Even on this talented team he’s the guy on the floor that everyone looks to in the key moments of a game.

by Who on Dec 3, 2007 1:31 PM EST reply actions  

A couple things about evil PP… like a manic-depressive, the trouble with eliminating the depression side is you lose the upside. PP is a small forward, and although the position of SF and SF have merged somewhat, I do think they are fairly distinct. Pierce has been able to play SG and even PF depending on who the opponents and teammates he had with him were, but that is more a testament to his overall skill level, like Duncan playing the 5. I would rank Lebron and only Lebron as definitively higher, and Lebron is prone to selfish play, bad attitude, lack of defense, etc. himself. My main gripe about Pierce is when Rondo is in the game he still helps out with getting the ball up court too much, but I think the same thing about Ray Allen too.

Also when comparing players with a substantial amount of NBA playing time, athleticism is a worthless factor; i.e. Caron Butler is more athletic than Pierce, doesn’t tell us anything that the other areas of comparison don’t. Butler’s athleticism might for example allow him to be a better defender or better slasher, but the athleticism by itself doesn’t tell us much. Also I believe players that depend on athleticism tend to age worse – but that is more of a vibe I’ve gotten from Hollinger’s analysis then something I feel 100% about.

by Brendan on Dec 3, 2007 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

So a future hall-of-fame player can be evil because he ball-hogs when he gets mad at losing for 4 years straight with 10 projects around him??? This isn’t the reason “other” people don’t consider him a top 15-20, its because when you are on a losing team you get slim exposure, and the celtics weren’t the “in” team. Nobody like yesterday’s girl, which was what paul pierce was for years after our ECF run. There’s no evil involved, he’s human.

by truthhurts34 on Dec 3, 2007 2:12 PM EST reply actions  

So when is the “Good and Bad of Ray Allen” article coming out. I see the same problems with him, but people only complain about Paul. tsk tsk tsk.

by Bankshot on Dec 3, 2007 2:59 PM EST reply actions  

really? you see the same problems with Ray Allen? I don’t see that

by Jeff Clark on Dec 3, 2007 3:02 PM EST reply actions  

Great piece, Jeff. Very nicely done.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Dec 3, 2007 3:07 PM EST reply actions  

I hope to god that Ray’s shooting slump is over soon, but he is a very good allaround player that helps in so many other ways. Its funny that he had a bit of a reputation as just a shooter because he can drive and finish all day, is a very good passer, can rebound, can go inside, midrange, get to the line, good first step, he can pretty much do it all and still spread the defense because they have to stick to him even when he is slumping because he could snap out at any time….. he has impressed me being much better allaroudn player than I thought he was (I knew he could play allaround so I wasnt naive, I knew he could do alot but I didnt know he could do it all at such a high level.)… he is a very good leader too, working the refs for his teammates and looking out for the youngsters. All 3 of our triplethreat are different personalities and styles of leadership that all complement each other and are very effective together, good job danny.

Anyways, I agree with most of what you say on Paul. Some is a bit exhadurated I believe, but the main point is absolutely right. Paul has been great this year though, its been almost all good paul. That is a great thing, the great veteran team has alot to do with that but also Paul maturing into such a wellrounded player and great person.

Yeah, so this is probably the worst shooting slump of Ray Allen’s career over these last 2 weeks (9 games). And we’re 14-2, but I sure hope to god he snaps out of it soon. He can still be effective getting to the line and the rim and all, but I just really hope it ends. I know it will end soon though, he’s a great player and a great shooter, he is open so its just a matter of time before he’s playing as great as he did in our first 5 games of the season when his shot is back……..

The best surprise of this season for me is how good Paul and Ray have been on defense. I’ve seen times where Paul’s defense was horrendous in the past, and I know that Ray had a reputation as a guy that could defend good when he really tries but usually is a bad defender…… so when Paul and Ray talked about stepping up their defense before the season I was skeptical. But they have both really backed up the talk and REALLY stepped up their defense and played great on that end of the floor. Both have done a great job on defense and really bought in, I guess not having to use all energy on offense does make a huge difference, as well as buying into the defensive system in order to be winning as much as possible…… that is my best surprise of this season though: Ray and Pauls great defense thus far. Both have displayed great effort and played good perimeter and team defense all year so far, especially Paul really locking down at times but Ray has done very good too. Go Celtics, great effort and great job! Theyre hungry and really want it, theyre a great team that we can all be proud of!

by celtpride34pp20ra5kg on Dec 3, 2007 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

You guys underrate Carmelo by a long shot. That kid is the real deal, his defense is much improved as well as his passing and rebounding and he is one of the best pure scorers in the league as well as one of the most efficient players in the NBA 30 ppg on 50% shooting.

by celtpride34pp20ra5kg on Dec 3, 2007 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

By the way, very great article.

by celtpride34pp20ra5kg on Dec 3, 2007 3:39 PM EST reply actions  

Jeff…interesting concept (good/evil Paul)…brings the term conjecture to a whole new level….

by Fastbreak on Dec 3, 2007 4:31 PM EST reply actions  

Great SArticle. very accurate description of pierce. I sense our reaction to him as well. when all is said and done he is our man so lets keep him. thats all there is to that.

by Freeease1 on Dec 3, 2007 8:18 PM EST reply actions  

Jeff, some interesting commentary and nicely written, but you lose all credibility and I mean all credibility, when you talk about “top 25” in the league. To think that about Paul Pierce is beyond all rational comprehension. You are hereby a member of the Paul Pierce “underappreciation and undervaluation club”; you have joined a few “insightful” geniuses from the RealGM Celtics board, and I hope you all enjoy each other. Personally, I would rather eat salmonella-infected turkey or discourse with Oprah or Hillary Clinton. First of all, it is preposterous to compare wings with points and bigs. Secondly, with regard to wings, anyone who does not consider Paul a top wing in the game (in the same stratosphere as Lebron, Kobe, DWade, TMac and Melo) has the basketball insight of a squid. This man will become the fifth leading scorer in Celtic history this year and the third leading scorer in Celtic history after next year – and Tommy H and others have accurately called him the best pure “scorer” in celtic history (not player, scorer). He scores from 3, on the pullup J, on the postup, and finishes with either hand. He also rebounds better than anyone his size in the league. Now that he no longer has to carry a GARBAGE team (as he has for 9 years), and has KG and Ray, you are seeing his defensive and passing A game more and more. After the Celts go deep into the playoffs for the next few years, he is a LOCK for the HOF. Also, given your preposterously selective memories of “evil” Paul, please check to see which players in the NBA have hit the most gamewinning and gameicing “clutch” shots. Please do check. Answer: Paul Pierce, Ray Allen and Carmelo Anthony. Does Paul have flaws. Sure he does. In fact, take a hard look – so do Kobe and Lebron and DWade and TMac and AI. Has he matured emotionally? You bet your petunia he has. Does he have the need to drive into 3 and 4 people very much – rarely these days since the Celts finally gave him a real team to play with. Top 25 – yeah right, and we are going to land a spaceship on Saturn next week.

by robert smith on Dec 3, 2007 9:59 PM EST reply actions  

i recall an incidence involving Paul Pierce and Jamaal Tinsley of Pacers in a playoff game two years ago.

Celtics is leading by something like 1 to 2 points and has the ball. With the clock ticking down to the final seconds, a foul occurs involving both (i think Jamaal hits Paul’s head). cannot recall exactly, but Paul responds immedately to the hard foul with retaliation. after a long discussion by the ref, Paul is ejected with his second tech foul and the Pacers are rewarded with freeflow. anyway, the game is tied at the end of regulation but Celtics still win it in OT.

obviously Paul’s emotion has brought out his dark side, and he doesn’t seem know how to deal with it at that stage of his career. and i would say Jamaal’s “strategy” works out up to that point.

by lis on Dec 4, 2007 2:10 AM EST reply actions  

Love Paul, impossible to be objective. Anyway… he could loose 10 lbs most of the time, and occasionaly shows it late in games. One of the best in the clutch… Has the overdrive and can take over games on a Kobe/TMac level from time to time. Likeable, (ie way more than aforementioned & Lebron). Shows up Vince Carter regularly, and who doesn’t love seeing that?

He’s our guy.

by AllstonCeltics on Dec 4, 2007 2:48 AM EST reply actions  

I would perhaps and I emphasis perhaps take Lebron over Paul, other than that, no thanks.

Paul bleeds pure Green with not one ounce of tainted blood.

The great ones take the shot and accept the win or the loss. From a team point of view, I believe we need to become more creative from a coaching perspective in end of game situations and not rely so heavily on ISO’s. That would eliminate many bad Paul situations straight up.

Paul is tough, ultra tough, how many stab wounds was it? Paul is a scorer, a rebounder, a passer and a better defender than a lot of people give him credit for.

Paul is a Celtic and proud of it, for me, that is what it is all about and I am rooting for him every single game.

I also agree with Bankshot, in terms of the article I certainly see the good and bad Ray Allen. The similarity between the two players is simple, they both desparately want to win.

I wouldn’t swap either of them, especially the way they complement each others games.

Excellent, thought provoking article.

Go the Green !!!!

Cheers

Aussie

by Aussie Celtic on Dec 5, 2007 1:01 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi