Daily Babble: Latest Trading Chips Get One Thumb Down, One Up
The sour commentary first:
Thumbs down: To Smush Parker, who is being shopped by Miami less than three months into his tenure there. In fairness, I have long since stopped being objective about this individual, particularly since I named him the NBA's Least Valuable Player for the 2006-07 campaign. My thoughts then:
[Parker] is a point guard who doesn't distribute too well (2.8 apg), doesn't rebound (2.5 rpg), isn't a great shooter (.437 from the field), can't shoot free throws (.645), and doesn't even score all that much (11.1). With the exception of the fact that he occasionally tries hard for a few plays at a time on defense, he tends to be completely useless. And he is known to have occasional attitude issues. Great.
That was at the end of last season, before he got his shot with the Heat. In the interest of full disclosure, it seems worth noting that since then, Parker has managed to do a putrid job as a reserve for nine games (.315 shooting, 4.8 points, 1.7 assists, 0.9 turnovers in 20.4 minutes per game) and gotten himself suspended indefinitely from the Heat for what has officially been described as "an incident with a female valet" and has now been openly placed on the trading block by Miami. Parker has established a legacy in multiple cities of poor behavior and inept play. Hard to imagine why any contending team would want to take a chance on bringing him in.
This makes it all the more worrisome that the Celtics are now rumored to be involved in the Parker hunt. The fact that he is classified as a point guard is the closest Parker comes toward fulfilling what is considered to be one of the Celtics' most crucial needs. He will not be a mentor for Rajon Rondo, and he will likely be both unproductive and a distraction. There is virtually no move centered on Parker that the C's could make to bring him in that would be palatable toward improving the team.
Now that we have fulfilled the day's negativity quotient, on to the better review:
Steve's daily posts can be found on the CelticsBlog NBA page. Check back daily for quality content.
Thumbs up: To Mickael Pietrus, who isn't thrilled with his reduced role in Golden State and is eligible to be traded as of Tuesday. Pietrus has seen a major drop in his minutes and his production this season after a career year in 2006-07, but there has been no drop in his athleticism and ability. He stands 6-foot-6 and 215 pounds, but thanks to the Warriors run-and-gun smallball-style system, Pietrus has often been pressed into playing bigger than he is, and it has only served to enhance his versatility. He can guard three positions and isn't afraid of anyone. Offensively, he is an excellent leaper with the quickness to become a dangerous slasher, and he can shoot the ball a bit as well. Pietrus definitely has the potential to be a valuable rotation player on a contending team in this league, and he could provide a valuable spark anywhere he goes. Further, his $3.47 million contract comes off the books at the end of the year, meaning he won't be a long-term burden for any suitor who turns out to be less than thrilled with his services.
The word is out that Pietrus wants to leave Oakland, and this could lead to his being available at a bargain price. Probably not the most needed fit for our beloved C's, but he will end up somewhere, and he will make an impact. Looking forward to watching it happen.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He strikes me as a more athletic, but less fundamentally sound version of Posey. I like his game and think he could turn into a very solid player with the help of KG/Pierce/Allen tutoring him a bit. But like you said, he doesn’t really fit either of the Celtics two main needs. I don’t know who Nellie/Mullin would want from us… maybe Pruitt to spell Baron Davis for a few minutes a game now that Hudson is done… but it would take something else. Powe? He’s a natural fit in Oakland… not the ideal Warriors player though.
Big Ticket,
You hit it right on the head. Despite my comment at the end, I would very much enjoy the prospect of Pietrus in green. I think watching his development would be a very enjoyable process and that he would progressively become more involved. That said, it is very hard to think of a move that would make sense for both teams. For the C’s, Pietrus would be more of a luxury depth addition than someone who fills one of the major needs (backup point, big man), which means that I would think the Celts willingness to give up significant parts would be at a particularly low point. Further, as you pointed out, not really sure what would work or Golden State. You made the point that despite being a homeboy, Powe wouldn’t necessarily fit in their system, and I’m not sure who else the C’s could afford to part with here. Can’t imagine Scal-for-Pietrus working for Nellie.
I like Pietrus, but I’ll have to be happy to watch him grow wherever else he ends up.
Long as I don’t ever have to watch Parker in green, I think I’ll be more than okay.
Thanks as always for your thoughts.
-sw
The article I read about this said, “The player said he will give up his rights, which could cost him money on next summer’s free agent market, for the chance to play 35 minutes a game.” He wouldn’t get as many minutes at Boston as he is currently getting in Golden State, so if he is shooting for “35 minutes a game,” I think you can move on to the next rumor.
Thankfully, the Celts are finally at a point where any trade is not necessarily a good thing. Frankly, I really doubt that Ainge is going to make anymore moves this year barring injury (knock on wood). Who wants to mess with such fine chemistry?
by LonelyTXCelt on Dec 31, 2007 2:51 AM EST reply actions
(1) Smush Parker
He isn’t even an NBA player right now. His game has completely fallen off the map, especially his defense. He doesn’t belong in this league, he isn’t good enough. We’re definitely not the team he should go to to regain his belief.
(2) Pietrus
Love this guy but to be honest he’s a dumb player that can’t operate in the NBA. He pouts over a lack of touches, over a lack of scoring opportunities. He has no idea how to move off the ball when Baron or Jacks are dominating it. He just doesn’t fit in an NBA offense. He needs a Euro offense where people share the ball. He doesn’t function offensively in any NBA style offense. He can’t.
He’s really is a quality defensive player. Great athleticism and length. He’d fit nicely into Chicago, just like he would have at the time of the draft. They need a big two guard who can D up. GSW needs a backup point – Duhon for Pietrus anyone?
Pietrus has a huge amount of growth to do before he’s a 30 minute player on a good team. He simply struggles too much in NBA offenses. His shot is a constant adventure. One of the leagues streak shooters.
I like him a lot, just isn’t at the level he and many others think he’s at.
You know who I like more than Mickael Pietrus? His brother. 6-10 bundle of energy and toughness. Combo forward. Almost as quick as Mickael despite his size. Not the penetrator Mickael is but much better defensively, on the boards, off the ball and does a better job playing within his limits. He has an interesting and developing offensive game. He has some garbage type skills in the paint, nice midrange game and surprises you with his range despite the fact he doesn’t pull the trigger much. Solid passer too. Great role player. Every team in the NBA should be trying to get this guy on their bench. I’d love to see Jason Kidd feeding him the ball. He has yet to declare for the draft. He must be 20-21 by now. He has the mentality of Turiaf/KG in Jeffries body, that’s the best description I can give.

by 




















