Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Are Bloggers To Blame For Kitchen-gate?

I hate that this business with Maxwell has become such a story.  Partly because I'm not big on gossip and the tearing down of celebrities simply because they are famous.  And partly because I worked hard on the other posts I've put up in the last day or so and they have been largely ignored in favor of this tripe.

However, one angle of the story that needs to be addressed is the role of bloggers like me in the course of a story.  For instance, WEEI and other sources have indicated that we are blowing it way out of proportion. 

The line of reasoning is that Cedric was using his "Tommy Heinson voice" and pretending to say something outrageous as a joke.  Here's the thing: I can't tell you if that is true because I wasn't listening to the WEEI broadcast and I have yet to hear it for myself.  All I had to go on yesterday was another blogger's reporting of the events.

In fact, my discovery of the incident was via a 3rd blog - the AOL Fanhouse blog.  I read that entry and was shocked by the comments as they appeared in print.  Sadly, that blogger didn't gain much credibility by referring to Maxwell as an "essential reserve" on the 80's teams whose greatest skill was "towel waving."  Obviously he was mistaking Max for ML Carr.  He goes on to condemn Maxwell (as many commenters on this blog have done - including myself).

For my part, I decided to bypass that blog and quote the original source (Universal Hub) directly.  In the blog post, I quoted only the source and added no additional commentary, letting the reader make the call for themselves. 

Time for introspection:  Could I have handled that differently?  Should I have added a disclaimer that I had not heard the comments for myself and thus cannot vouch for the context of the comments?  Perhaps.  In matters like this, I do think an additional layer of disclaimer is necessary.  On the other hand: Should I have avoided the story altogether?  I don't think so.  This was newsworthy before I touched it because it had been reported by two other blogs already.

What of the comments themselves (and the subsequent explanation/rationalization)?  I must say, even if he was making the comments in jest, they were (as the WEEI rep stated) a poor attempt at humor.  If he was using his "Tommy Heinson voice," does that imply that he thinks Tommy is sexist?  I doubt that he does, so one would have to hope he's targeting some other unknown person or persons that share that viewpoint.  Again, it is hard to know what his intentions were without hearing the clip.

Still, in any light, the comments are regrettable and out of place on a Celtics broadcast.  This isn't a matter of freedom of speech.  It is a matter of representing your position of employment the best you can.  In that regard, Max fell short and the apology is necessary.

I don't think "bloggers" made the situation any better, and certainly some blogs are more reliable than others.  I'm hoping that mine is viewed as one of the better ones as I strive to give you the most accurate information possible (as opposed to the most buzz-creating slant).

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Whether Cedric’s comment was a ‘joke’ or not, is not the point. It wasn’t funny and at the VERY least, deserves a public apology.

Moreover, it has exposed the true (sad) feelings of many of the posters on this blog.

Whether Cedric was using a ‘Tommy’ voice or not also isn’t the point. HE said it and should be held accountable (which it appears he is).

by mcpu40 on Feb 28, 2007 4:28 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t think you did anything wrong, Jeff. You didn’t sensationalize the story, you didn’t call for Ced’s head, and you didn’t make any grand pronouncements on Ced the person. I think that you acted completely appropriately.

Also, many of the lesser known blogs are simply public diaries. The guy on AOL Fanhouse was expressing an opinion; he didn’t present himself as Dan Rather (speaking of unreliable news sources ;)), and didn’t attempt to break a story, but was instead expressing a point of view he was completely welcome to have. If you don’t like somebody’s blog entry, either ignore it or respond to it, expressing why you disagree. The blog culture has allowed for interactive discourse on a lot of stories, which many times may lead to some believing stories have been blown out of proportion, but which will more often than not contribute to the greater good by fostering discussion and debate.

by Roy_Hobbs on Feb 28, 2007 4:30 PM EST reply actions  

i think this whole thing should be put in perspective, US soldiers are dying everyday in Iraq, 3 billion live on less than $2 per day…we take sports too seriously anyway and comments like this are miniscule compared to real suffering in the world…this should be a non-issue…we might as well censure what everyone says…

by rutzan on Feb 28, 2007 4:30 PM EST reply actions  

All you did was report what happened. If the bloggers were wrong that Max didn’t actual make the “get back in the kitchen” comment, then the orginial blogger would be at fault. All you did was merely site the source, which readers have to asess the credibility of the source.

Jeff, why in the world are you getting tweak by what anyone says on WEEI?

Furthermore, why does anyone even listen to WEEI?

by knocsucow00 on Feb 28, 2007 4:42 PM EST reply actions  

I haven’t listened to WEEI since I got SIRIUS. ;D

by mcpu40 on Feb 28, 2007 4:46 PM EST reply actions  

If I had a dime every time Glenn Ordway said something inappropriate I could cover the costs of his meals at Davios for a year.

Max had it right earlier in the year when he gave his response about what he thought of Ordway, “FRAUD! FRAUD! FRAUD!”

He’s a joke.

by The Duke33 on Feb 28, 2007 4:48 PM EST reply actions  

Is that what this season has come to? A freakin story about a broadcast remark? Holy crap, we are in dark times my friends.

by CelticRebel on Feb 28, 2007 4:49 PM EST reply actions  

What because it was a sexist comment it was ok to joke about it. Some things should never be joked about especially in that type of forum. I would love to ask Maxwell if a white announcer made a similar comment about a black ref, how Maxwell would take it. Bottomline is he is sexist and he should have to answer for it. Joke or no joke, doesn’t matter, you just don’t say that without thinking it.

by Moranis on Feb 28, 2007 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

Furthermore, why does anyone even listen to WEEI? You just answered to your own question,further more I’d listen to espn’s national talk radio anyway.(thanks espn boston) ;D

by celticfan34 on Feb 28, 2007 4:55 PM EST reply actions  

Good afternoon. I have to say that I’m guilty of succumbing to the allure of this story – it was the main reason I registered today – but I have been here many times before and enjoy the features of the website. To Jeff: good job!
It’s unfortunate that this story has taken on a life of its own, when there are so many other things going on in the world other than what the Celtics broadcast team said during a boring Monday night game.
However, I do think it brings up an accountability issue with blogs (or the internet in general). Not to generalize, and certainly not to throw dirt on the work of the bloggers at this well-organized and informed website – BUT there are so many sources of junk information out there that, in today’s world, become “sources” for major mainstream news stories. Thus, this whole Maxwell thing originated from some obscure blogger who doesn’t have to respond to the same criticisms that someone like Glenn Ordway or Dan Shaughnessy would get.
I do realize how valuable it is to have these forums – if you can’t get on the radio or in the newspaper, it’s a great tool. I myself am fortunate to have a broacast forum but I am also lured to these online forums to dig up news and rumors and solicit general opinions. It’s just unfortunate that Max gets dragged through the dirt on a NATIONAL scale for a stupid comment that he’s apologizing for. All because an oversensitive blogger chose to light him up.

by The Fox on Feb 28, 2007 4:58 PM EST reply actions  

By the way, yeah, thank goodness for ESPN Boston in the mornings.

by The Fox on Feb 28, 2007 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

this thing is retarded. Max was joking. Let it go. Multiple blogs about a nothing-incident that was misinterpreted isn’t going to help kill it.

by LarBrd33 on Feb 28, 2007 5:01 PM EST reply actions  

Thank God Max is black or somebody would’ve made it both sexist&racial..the fact this situation is so ridiculous sp. is the ONLY reason to cover it…Jeff was right on as usual…

by Motown on Feb 28, 2007 5:03 PM EST reply actions  

It isn’t a nothing incident. He was caught joking about something he shouldn’t have been. If he would of been dropping jokes using the N word and impersonating Chris Rock, I doubt it still would be considered a nothing-incident.

I’m not calling for Max to be fired, but an apology is needed. After that the story is done.

by knocsucow00 on Feb 28, 2007 5:05 PM EST reply actions  

LOL, LOL. Bloggers are all irresponsible, but the people who call sports talk radio shows— not to mention the hosts— are not? When a caller identifies himself as “Joe from Dracut” is that any less anonymous than calling yourself “Brickowski?”

Occasionally people here get their facts wrong, myself included. We all try to fix inaccuracies when we discover them. Members of the traditional media screw up just as much as bloggers, as when Fox and MSNBC reported that Barrack Obama had attended a madrassa in Indonesia.

Blog participants are just as entitled to express their opinions as Craig Ordway. Besides, this blog is much more fun than listening to WEEI, and the folks here are more knowledgable about the Celics than most of the blowhards on WEEI— and that includes Mr. Ordway.

by Brickowski on Feb 28, 2007 5:07 PM EST reply actions  

LarBrd33 said:
  this thing is retarded. Max was joking. Let it go. Multiple blogs about a nothing-incident that was misinterpreted isn’t going to help kill it.

Again I ask what if Tommy made a similar comment about a black ref. For example, something along the lines of “he belongs back in the jungle”. Would it then be a non-issue as you say it. And let’s be real here, the comment Max made and the comment I have in quotes are on the same level of offensiveness to the offended group. It is not a non-issue nor should it be. Sexism should not be tolerated under any circumstance.

by Moranis on Feb 28, 2007 5:07 PM EST reply actions  

The Fox wrote

“However, I do think it brings up an accountability issue with blogs (or the internet in general). Not to generalize, and certainly not to throw dirt on the work of the bloggers at this well-organized and informed website – BUT there are so many sources of junk information out there that, in today’s world, become "sources” for major mainstream news stories."

Except with this story the bloggers got it right and reported the facts of what happened. Pretty funny how no one else in the media picked up on the story until a blogger had it (who’s doing their job exactly)???

This is just a jab by the mainstream media trying to discredit bloggers in general.

Also, how many times to writers/on-air personalities state something that is out right WRONG and never come back with corrections? Too many times to count.

by knocsucow00 on Feb 28, 2007 5:10 PM EST reply actions  

….and this too will pass…the tragedy, if there is one, is the heightened sensitivity to Max as being sexist instead of assuming that he meant to be funny but his comment “missed the mark” intended.

 I wonder if Hardaway’s comments had anything to do with heightened media sensivity to a miriad of sensitive issues? Expect to hear other broadcasters similarly chastised for crossing “imaginary” boundaries.

by moskqq on Feb 28, 2007 5:12 PM EST reply actions  

I’m old enough to remember Jimmy the Greek. He was just expressing an opinion too— and CBS ushered him out the door so fast that the breeze broke windows. And that happened 20 years ago. It’s not as though the “PC Police” have suddenly taken over.

by Brickowski on Feb 28, 2007 5:21 PM EST reply actions  

Yes, and this too will pass.

Speaking strictly as a Celtics Fan:(since my thoughts on the comments have already been made clear)

In a season in which no one thought it could get any worse, this happened at the worst possible time. Forget the context of the comments and your feelings on it for a moment and simply consider that a team already mired neck-deep in what can generously be called a crap season, the Celtics just didn’t need this extra negative publicity.

From that perspective, this season just got a little more sad, because this will go down in my mind as one of the worst seasons in franchise history, both on and off the court.

by hagrid on Feb 28, 2007 5:23 PM EST reply actions  

Moranis said

Again I ask what if Tommy made a similar comment about a black ref. For example, something along the lines of “he belongs back in the jungle”. Would it then be a non-issue as you say it. And let’s be real here, the comment Max made and the comment I have in quotes are on the same level of offensiveness to the offended group. It is not a non-issue nor should it be. Sexism should not be tolerated under any circumstance.

Tommy has said almost that exact same thing…..nobody made a big deal about it…..although he did apologize during the next game. i believe the comment came while the C’s were getting whipped by the Hawks and Tommy told mutombo (sp?) to go back to africa and hunt some lions, cause this one is over. people like over react to things people say. i agree he shouldnt have said it at that point in time, but he did…..get over it.

by IowaGuy on Feb 28, 2007 5:31 PM EST reply actions  

Brick – I’ll agree that “Joe from Dracut” and the “blowhards” on WEEI aren’t worth their weight in cow pies – and notice that I in fact complimented the quality of the posts on this website. I just think that the internet is such a DIFFERENT medium where the “personalities” who do the talking are legitimately hidden from the ire of those they offend. Whereas your classic sportswriter or radio host gets run out of town for botching something…it happens all the time. The blogger really has no one to answer to. Their job and public image is not at stake.

One thing that bugs me is the hostility that exists from the blogging community towards Bill Simmons. This guy is hanging his butt out there on a national stage and presenting an opinion – and yet bloggers constantly dig into him. We should be happy that a person writes a column that consistently talks about the CELTICS to a national subscription audience (through ESPN.com and the magazine). Sure, he has his go-to punchlines – but he’s at least putting himself out there.

I’m just sour that poor Max got rocked over something like this. Can we move on yet?

by The Fox on Feb 28, 2007 5:35 PM EST reply actions  

The reaction from WEEI was predictible. This type of behavior and attitude is not only acceptable there, it’s encouraged. Meanwhile, they pee their pants every time Manny Ramirez gets caught in traffic on the way to work. Also, I’m fairly convinced 90% of the hosts at WEEI don’t even watch the games.

by smiggity on Feb 28, 2007 5:36 PM EST reply actions  

Its just a stupid joke, everybody needs to lighten up

by Stoned Alone on Feb 28, 2007 5:45 PM EST reply actions  

The blogger really has no one to answer to. Their job and public image is not at stake.

(While alot of what you said “The Fox” I completely agree with, I chose to take these 2 sentences to expound on your point. Hope you don’t mind.)

Well, blogger do have people to answer to, just not in any meaningful way. Posters come and go, it’s a fact of the internet. The blog is rarely thier paid “job”, so therefore many have nothing in terms of culpability to restrict them from posting anything they want. Most(like me) write under a pseudo-name and unless you’re extremely handy with IP tracking, you’ll never find out who they are. Hence, even less culpability. They’ll never be held accountable, in “real life” for what they say. Any backlash comes in the form of site traffic(influxes of negative posts or everyone leaving the site), which for anyone who’s done this for a while has learned to shake off in the time if takes to pour yourself a pint.

Just a random aside here, I now return you to your regularly scheduled topic. ;)

by hagrid on Feb 28, 2007 5:51 PM EST reply actions  

Blogs are the closest thing I’ve seen to John Start Mill’s free marketplace of ideas. Mill believed that in such a marketplace the good ideas would eventually win out over the bad ideas and I agree with him.

by Brickowski on Feb 28, 2007 6:05 PM EST reply actions  

That’s John Stuart Mill.

by Brickowski on Feb 28, 2007 6:05 PM EST reply actions  

I might be in the minority, but if he’s doing it as Tommy Heinsohn I think it is kind of funny. Tommy has made it incredibly well known (to an obnoxious degree) that he doesn’t care for that referee one bit and I can absolutely picture Tommy saying that because he’s so lost with modern times. In fact, when my friend originally told me of the “incident” the first thing I said to him was “I bet Tommy thought it was funny.”

by StartOrien on Feb 28, 2007 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

I think you did make a mountain out of a molehill but some bloggers agreed with you.

Pete

by Sweet17 on Feb 28, 2007 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

The Fox,
Way to use the blog to promote your profession.
Your right, the bloggers behind the curtain, it’s an opportunity to express opinions, not professional,but an opinion. The bloggers not getting paid. The average blogger is a true hoops fan and this is there hobby. This is a great forum Jeff has, and I look forward to it everyday. Hats off to Jeff.

As for Bill Simmons, Is he not getting paid? If he states an opinion are we bloggers only allowed to state complementary remarks?
Anyone who states an opinion on this blog is going to be critiqued. That’s what makes it click, your opinion, my opinion…

Good luck on the show.

by Little D on Feb 28, 2007 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

It has been blown way out of proportion. This world is too sensitive. Needs a more healthy dose of George Carlin like human and common sense.

by tmcdon on Feb 28, 2007 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

I agree – hats off to Jeff for running this great site. I love the fact that this place exists to haggle over such issues as whether to trade Al Jefferson for Pau Gasol, whether we want to pick Oden or Durant in the draft, if Delonte West is an adequate point guard, and about whether or not DJ belongs in the Hall of Fame.

Ideally, radio would cover all of these loops just as effectively as blogs do. However, WEEI in particular, has fallen victim to trying to be too “cool” and “edgy” – resulting in shows that generally equate to 4 hours of nothing. With my own personal show, I’m trying to avoid that. I’m just starting out (this is my 3rd year), and of course I’d promote something that I believe in. I also love it when people call and start a legitimate Celtics conversation. Thank goodness. Oh yeah that’s 91.5 FM and wmfo.org between 4 and 6 on Thursdays :o)

In the case of Simmons, of course people can disagree with him. But the one time espn.com enabled comments on one of his pieces, about 13,000 people responded with mostly classless scathing criticisms – punctuated usually by references to Deadspin being better than he was. Is that called for?

by The Fox on Feb 28, 2007 6:26 PM EST reply actions  

Jeff,

I felt it was irresponsible yesterday, as you hadn’t heard it and then everyone went wild about it without hearing it. I understand your position though, and it’s hard to always remember to qualify things. Unlike those other blogs, you actually have readership, and as such you have much more of an imprint on the psyche of celtic nation, at least those who are avid readers on the web, and as a result I think maybe you do have more responsibility than most to add in sentences like “I haven’t heard it, so it is hard to know the context”. Because in this case, I absolutely believe that the court of public opinion would flip if they had been listening on WEEI when these comments were made.

Also, the quote you made was editorialized. As someone who was listening, Grande wasn’t giving him the proverbial Bob Lobel mulligan. There was no attempt to let him redeem himself, that’s drawing an opinion, and in my opinion it is a wrong one. They were just doing their usual banter, and I remember thinking at the time “God I hope those lines don’t find their way into the paper tomorrow”, because i knew they’d be overblown in this town without the context.

by teddykgb on Feb 28, 2007 6:59 PM EST reply actions  

" Moranis said:
  LarBrd33 said:
this thing is retarded. Max was joking. Let it go. Multiple blogs about a nothing-incident that was misinterpreted isn’t going to help kill it.

Again I ask what if Tommy made a similar comment about a black ref. For example, something along the lines of “he belongs back in the jungle”. Would it then be a non-issue as you say it. And let’s be real here, the comment Max made and the comment I have in quotes are on the same level of offensiveness to the offended group. It is not a non-issue nor should it be. Sexism should not be tolerated under any circumstance."

No dude. It’s a non-incident. Max was screwing around putting on his Tommy Heinsohn voice. It was taken way out of context. It’d be like me joking around with my friends, putting on a Kanye West voice and saying “George Bush hates black people!”. Get over it.

by LarBrd33 on Feb 28, 2007 7:43 PM EST reply actions  

It’s the chance you take when your up on the pedestal.

When I make reference to the word professional, I don’t mean they have more knowledge, I mean they are getting paid for what they say.

Send Jeff a check for the plug.

by Little D on Feb 28, 2007 7:57 PM EST reply actions  

I heard the full clip [on WEEI, I randomly turned it on while trying to get my one month year old to sleep, you know boring background noise] starting with play by play by Grande through the comments, through the play by play resuming. It definately read a lot worse than it sounded, but my take doesn’t change. It seemed pretty clear that Max was trying to change his voice and imitate someone else, in which case he would be mocking the views he’s being criticized for having. He was awful at the delivery. The next thing Max and Sean say is how much Violet’s officiating has improved, right after the comment.

I stand by my feelings laid out in the original thread after hearing it live, but if you get the chance, you should listen to it with about 30 seconds on both sides of the comments. The quote feels a bit cherry picked.

by Brendan on Feb 28, 2007 8:25 PM EST reply actions  

There should be no question whether or not Jeff did the right thing here… the question should be why such a non-story was legitimized by WEEI’s Lucifer-in-Chief, Jason Wolfe by suggesting that Max apologize. The issue likely would have died if he told the Boston Herald reporter for his article this morning a simple “No comment”. Instead he admits there is wrongdoing here, and the story becomes twice as big.

by The Duke33 on Feb 28, 2007 9:00 PM EST reply actions  

We seem to be focused on what was said and have completely dismissed the fact that Max was heckling Violet for a “blown” call. What is so derogatory about suggesting that Violet go back to what she probably is more proficient in doing (especially in view of her blown call)? Is it unreasonable to suggest that women spend more time in the kitchen than men? Or that women are likely better cooks than men?

  Why is that a “sexist” comment and therefor “insensitive” and derogatory? Are refs that immune from censorship? Male or female, when they blow a call they should expect criticism.

by moskqq on Feb 28, 2007 11:48 PM EST reply actions  

I have just 2 comments on this.

1. I really don’t care. He made a mistake and apologized, let’s get on with life.

2. Violet Palmer is by far the worst official in all basketball. I cringe everytime I see her at any game I watch. If she weren’t a woman and a black should would have been fired long ago. Just my opinion.

by badax33 on Mar 1, 2007 4:36 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?
Small
MVP's in Game7

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi