10 Years Ago - Jackie MacMullan Article
A reader of the blog sent this to me. It is an article published in SI from 10 years ago. March 17, 1997 to be exact. I think it offers some interesting perspective and odd parallels. Hopefully Jackie and SI are ok with me reprinting the whole thing here (they can contact me to take it down if they like). Read the rest after the jump by clicking "Read More."
Sports Illustrated
March 17, 1997
Lying Down on the Job?
Though their incessant losing might win them a potential savior in Tim Duncan, the Celtics say their defeats have been honestly earned.
By Jackie MacMullan
Boston Celtics coach M.L. Carr leaped from the bench, arms raised, then pirouetted down the sideline, his silk tie flapping in his face. Boston guard David Wesley had just stroked a three-pointer at the buzzer, giving his team a 50-48 halftime lead over the Sacramento Kings, and Carr ran toward the locker room pumping his fist. As he passed the FleetCenter press section, a reporter yelled to him, “M.L.! You’re supposed to lose these games. Remember?â€
Carr stopped abruptly. “Sorry,†he said, grinning, before resuming his dash to the dressing room. “I lost my head.â€
But in the second half of that Feb. 26 game, order was quickly restored. With guard Mitch Richmond pouring in 26 of his game-high 38 points, the Kings overtook the Celtics and won 111-105 for their first victory in Boston in 18 years. As the Celtics jogged off the court, their fans applauded appreciatively. All in all, it had been a good night. The home team had played hard, and it had lost, thereby dropping itself nearer to the bottom of the league standings and closer to the No. 1 pick in the June draft.
Ask hard-core Boston fans who their favorite Celtic is, and they’ll answer in unison: Tim Duncan, the Wake Forest senior who’s expected to be the grand prize in an otherwise thin draft. The drop-off from the No. 1 to the No. 2 pick is significant this year, giving a dismal team such as the Celtics extra reason to want as many Ping-Pong balls as possible in the NBA’s weighted, 13-team draft lottery. The only way to get the most Ping-Pong balls among nonexpansion teams (the Toronto Raptors and Vancouver Grizzlies aren’t eligible for the top pick until 1999) is to have the poorest record. And so, in a sense, the Celtics win by losing. “It’s the weirdest situation I’ve ever been in,†says Carr. “We bust our tail, lose, and fans slap me on the back, saying, ‘Great job.’â€After Sunday’s 114-90 loss to the Atlanta Hawks, the Celtics had dropped 17 of 18 and their record was 12-50, better only than the Grizzlies’ 11-52 mark. Moreover, Boston’s record in games decided by four points or less was a demoralizing 1-13. The Celtics’ performance in close games has encouraged whispers that Boston has been tanking. Some skeptics point to strange combinations on the floor at crucial moments and puzzling distribution of playing time. They wonder, for instance, why little-used backup center Steve Hamer was removed from the lineup just as he started doing some damage (seven points and four rebounds in eight minutes) in a 98-95 loss to the Indiana Pacers on March 4. Seemingly the most damning evidence came on Feb. 28, when the Celtics led the Detroit Pistons 84-82 with .3 of a second remaining. NBA rules specify that with so little time left, a player can’t catch a pass before shooting and still be considered to have gotten off his shot before time expired, so a team has only one option--an alley-oop pass and a tap-in. Yet Boston let 6’2†Pistons guard Lindsey Hunter position himself under the basket and tip in the tying hoop. Detroit won 106-100 in overtime. Says one general manager, “That game caught my eye. I don’t think they’re trying to lose on purpose, but I don’t think they’re trying to win on purpose, either.â€
“That annoys me,†Carr counters. “Don’t you think putting yourself up two with three tenths of a second left is a pretty strange way to lose a game? I told our guys to defend their biggest guy and best leaper, Theo Ratliff. But then Hunter went backdoor, and we got caught.â€
Carr points to a more basic reason for the Celtics’ record. “Look at our roster,†he says. “We’ve been decimated by injuries.†Indeed, through last weekend Boston led the league in man-games lost to injury (335). Last season’s leading scorer, forward Dino Radja, had surgery on his left knee in January, sidelining him for the remainder of the season. Its top three-point shooter, guard Dana Barros, had surgery on his left ankle in February and will be out at least until April. On March 4 guard Greg Minor had an operation on his right foot; he will be out for the season. With centers Pervis Ellison (fractured toe) and Frank Brickowski (right shoulder surgery) done for ’96-97 as well, the Celtics have no shot blocker in the middle. That’s a big reason that they are abysmal defensively; at week’s end they were worst in the NBA in points allowed (106.5 per game) and in opponents’ field goal percentage (.500).
Yet Boston has done little to fill its personnel needs, for instance, using a virtually unknown rookie, Brett Szabo, a refugee from the CBA and the German League, as its starting center rather than trading for help. “I don’t blame the Celtics,†says one Eastern Conference coach. “We’d do the same if we had a chance at the No. 1 pick.â€
Carr, who has been Boston’s coach and director of basketball operations since June 1995, says he knew in the preseason that his team might be subjected to scrutiny about tanking, so he called New Jersey Nets general manager John Nash and offered to swap No. 1 picks. That way, he surmised, nobody could question whether his club was playing hard enough, since any losses would benefit New Jersey. Nash confirms that Carr approached him twice on the subject. “I admire his courage and his creativity,†says Nash, “but at the time it wasn’t something we felt we should do.†Imagine if the Nets had made the deal. Boston would now be facing the increasing possibility that Duncan, its ray of hope, would instead shine in New Jersey.
Call it the Curse of Len Bias. Since June 1986, the last time the Celtics won the NBA championship, Bias, Boston’s top draft pick that year, died of cocaine intoxication; in the ensuing seven years injuries to stars Bill Walton (foot), Larry Bird (back) and Kevin McHale (foot) prematurely ended their careers; and in ’93 All-Star Reggie Lewis collapsed and died of heart failure. Add some unwise No. 1 draft picks (notably Michael Smith in ’89 and Acie Earl in ’93) and some ill-advised free-agent signings (Dominique Wilkins in ’94 and Barros in ’95), and the decline of this once proud franchise, which has 16 championship banners hanging from the arena rafters, hardly seems surprising.
In the eye of the storm is the charismatic Carr, who won over Boston fans as a hustling, towel-waving player from 1979 to ’85. This season Carr’s upbeat demeanor has been his best asset. “M.L. seems to be emotionally detached from the whole mess,†says Boston Hall of Famer Bob Cousy, now one of the Celtics’ television analysts. “We’ve gotten used to today’s players laughing and playing cards 20 minutes after a tough loss, but not the coaches. They bleed. But M.L. doesn’t.â€
NBA sources say the league office has been monitoring all potential lottery teams to make sure they’re putting forth their best efforts and has not found Boston’s performance suspect. Nevertheless, the Celtics remain in an enviable position in the Duncan sweepstakes. Plus, they own the Dallas Mavericks’ first-round pick, acquired in a trade last June that sent center Eric Montross and Boston’s ’96 first-round pick to the Mavs. The Celtics also obtained Dallas’s ’96 first-round pick in that deal and used it to select forward Antoine Walker, one of Boston’s few bright spots this season. With the Mavs at 19-41 at week’s end, their pick in June should be in the top eight.
Who will coach those lottery picks is unsettled. Celtics sources say that while Carr hopes to keep his executive post next season, he’s considering relinquishing his coaching duties. The people’s choice to replace him is Kentucky coach Rick Pitino, but, say sources inside and outside the club, Pitino would never work with Carr. Celtics owner Paul Gaston would not comment last week on his level of interest in Pitino, but one team executive cautions, “Don’t underestimate the relationship between Paul and M.L.†Another scenario has Bird, currently a Boston special assistant, emerging as a player in the front office. (He has made it clear he has no interest in coaching.)
For now Bird remains in the shadows, watching Boston’s futile campaign from afar. Last Thursday in Charlotte, the Celtics clung to a three-point lead with 21 seconds to go, but Hornets sniper Glen Rice drilled a trey to tie the game.
In overtime Boston (surprise!) lost 122-121. Unfazed, Celtics fans happily drifted off to sleep, visions of Ping-Pong balls dancing in their heads.
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
Hey, the Dominique and Dana Barros signings weren’t bad. Nique was the leading scorer on a playoff team that played the eventually Eastern Conference champion Orlando Magic very tough, and Dana Barros was coming off a season with Philly in which he averaged about 20 and 8. There was no reason for David Wesley to get PT over Barros, either.
Anyway, in terms of the article, it was painful to read, knowing the eventual outcomem, i.e. not getting Duncan, Pitino being the anti-Christ, etc.
by CelticsWhat35 on Mar 1, 2007 7:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow, there are certainly a lot of similarities with the current situation. I’m not a tanking fan, so i’ll always root for wins. I think that playing to lose kills the spirits of sports. The NBA shouldn’t reward the teams that play to lose, but it’s tough to determine when it openly happens.
by greenwise on Mar 1, 2007 7:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Very interesting read. I had forgotten just how transparent the fantanking had gotten, with crowds openly applauding losses. It sounds shocking now, but imagine if Oden had spent three more years in college and was sure to come out – the amount of tanking that season by the lottery teams would be much worse than it already is now.
I hope this article also clears up the fact that Duncan was widely considered a sure thing that season. I’ve seen some revisionist history where people claim otherwise, but every GM in the league knew that season who the prize was.
MacMullan also points out ahead of tournament time that that year’s draft class was thin after the first pick, and it ended up being so. That danger is not here in this draft, but back then the “no guarantee” people would have had much more justification. Of course, that team was not in a position to make a trade for a star either, so tanking was their best move anyway.
The NBA is always going to have this problem when a young superstar big man is poised to enter the draft, because the league has expanded to too many teams. There is now bulging middle class that has little chance to do much in the playoffs but aren’t horrible enough to have a shot at the top players in the draft. This is a big problem for the league, but they won’t contract because it would cost them money. It’s going to get ugly this season by the last month or so, but how can you blame the teams? Oden looks to be a franchise big man for the next 15 years. A team low in the lottery has no reason not to take their best (worst) shot. Look at how Minnesota’s last game and the Celts last game ended up giving the 6th pick and Randy Foye to the T-Wolves, the guy Ainge wanted. Tanking can prosper and the NBA would rather look away because it doesn’t want to put attention on the elephant in the room. Besides, they could never prove it anyway.
by obnoxiousmime on Mar 1, 2007 7:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I remember it well.
Boy how I wish that Bird took over the GM position and they had hired Larry Brown at the time.
Things might be different, than having Rick Pitino completely destroy our franchise for the next 6 years.
Hopefully things will work out better the second time around
by Ancient Red on Mar 1, 2007 8:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
yes, the Pitino stuff and the hints at Bird waiting in the shadows only to slip away because of Gaston is haunting
by Jeff Clark on Mar 1, 2007 8:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
How did Pitino destroy the franchise yet Ainge is a savior? I just don’t get the people on this board.
by Moranis on Mar 1, 2007 8:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The mor things change, the more they remain the same.
by Brickowski on Mar 1, 2007 9:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Horrible to remember. I was ashamed to be a fan at that point. I recall telling a friend at school it’s called a Lottery for a reason. You have a ‘chance’ to win. It’s not a lock by any stretch of the imagination. So play your best ball & let the chips fall where they may.
You also have to remember that players that you hope to resign like AJ want to win NOW and purposely tanking games will loom large in players minds when a contract is put in front of them.
by LuckyNumber07 on Mar 1, 2007 9:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Both wonderfully reminiscent and true…But an alley oop to a midgit with .3 seconds remaining!!…Give that man a Guiness!!!
I almost wish M.L. were our coach right now…or maybe bring him back if we get a top two pick and let him rise to the rafters with a good young team under his belt…Too poetic to be true…alas,
by BoundingRounder on Mar 1, 2007 12:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t think that Durant looked all that great last night. Really good, but not great.
by Vermont Green on Mar 1, 2007 1:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
LuckyNumber07,
I agree with your premise. What also looms in the minds of players is who your going to play with. If your lucky enough to get Oden and he’s going to be is good as advertised, he alone will attract players that wouldn’t consider Boston right now.
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again, tanking was ML’s plan. The sad thing is, these 15 wins were not by design and I haven’t seen any signs of tanking (incompetence, yes). I suspect if we get close enough to Philly or Memphis somehow stays close enough to us, I would suspect tanking may occur with 10 games to go.
by Little D on Mar 1, 2007 1:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
One thing to remember about Durant and Oden is not that they either looked great or looked lousy, it’s what they will become as players down the road.
Many of these young kids, and our Celtics team can atest to that is that it takes time to develop and become polished.
Lebron James is 1 out of a million, so don’t expect either Durant or Oden to come in here immediately and make an impact playing against other teams with Veteran players.
The thought process is to get Durant or Oden and build and develop. I would expect this team to make the playoffs next season based on the fact that Jefferson will be better, that a healthy Szczerbiak & Perkins, a more mature Green and Rondo, a steady Gomes and West will provide come next season.
Add another Veteran player, be it Point Guard, in a trade with Ratliffs salary or a free agent and things will be looking much better especially when you add Durant or Oden
And if we don’t get Durant or Oden, it’s still a strong draft where we can either trade the pick or select someone of quality
by Ancient Red on Mar 1, 2007 1:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It’s weird that the Grizzlies were our “competition” back then, and again today.
We have gradually gotten better at tanking inconspicuously, though. ;)
by Eeyore III on Mar 1, 2007 1:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The difference this year is that if we don’t get the number one, numbers 2 and 3 are still very good (definitely a Wright fan here, but durant is still better)…Van Horn, Billups(took a while), Antonio Daniels, Battie, and Mercer are hardly prizes. The only real impact player besides Duncan is McGrady who went #9- if we had only known. I agree that the situations are eerily similar, but I think we have a little more leeway this year if we don’t get the #1 in what’s considered the deepest draft in decades.
by jambr380 on Mar 1, 2007 2:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’d like to see if anyone can dig up an article about the Cavs tanking the year that Cleveland was hoping for LeBron (I think LeBron even made noise about not wanting to play in Cleveland)
that was a deep draft and everyone near the top got a good player except the Pistons, and they still managed to win a title
by Jeff Clark on Mar 1, 2007 2:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The only difference between that season and this is that in that season we were outright tanking, and there was a much weaker draft. Either of the top 2 picks will get us a franchise player, and most of the rest of the top 10 would get us a future all star.
by PrimusSucks on Mar 1, 2007 6:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Some interesting analogies, with the Celts and Grizzlies again having the 2 worst records. And Theo Ratliff, as the best leaper on the Pistons? Wish he still had something left…
by tb727 on Mar 1, 2007 8:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
imagine if we had drafted mcgrady and billups and stuck with them….
by celticsclay on Mar 1, 2007 9:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ah, what might have been. Forget about Duncan. Lets start with 2001. All of the players below were available to the Celtics but they passed on most of them.
2001: Celtics roster is Pierce, Walker and trash (but some useful trash, e.g. Eric Williams, Tony Battie and Adrian Griffin.
2001 draft: Celtics select Joe Johnson, Richard Jefferson and Gilbert Arenas.
2002 draft: Celtics select Tayshaun Prince
2003 draft: Celtics select Boris Diaw and Josh Howard with picks 16 and 20.
2004 draft: Jefferson, West and Allen.
2005: Gerald Green
2006: Rudy Gay, Rondo.
2007 depth chart:
C: Jefferson/Battie
PF: Diaw/Prince
SF: Pierce/Jefferson
SG: Joe Johnson/Josh Howard
PG: Arenas/West
Walker and Williams would be long gone. Maybe they move Walker for another veteran backup center, e.g. Joel Przybilla.
Griffin would be a veteran character guy, and Tony Allen would be a little-used reserve. Green, Gay and Rondo would be in the developmental league. Players like Justin Reed and Ryan Gomes would never make the roster.
That’s a 55-60 win team. With Mike D’Antoni coaching them, it might be a 70 win team.
by Brickowski on Mar 1, 2007 10:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
To be fair, Brickowski, you have to assume that, if the Celtics made the right pick the year before, if their record would be good enough to get the pick the next year. Obviously, Arenas was a 2nd rounder, so that didn’t make a difference, but if they had Johnson and Jefferson and Arenas and Prince and Howard and Diaw, would they really have had a bad enough record to pick 15th for Al? It’s nitpicking, but something to look at. There’s a reason teams like the Lions, Browns and the mid 90’s Celtics perennially screwed up high draft picks; they were constantly in a position to screw it up.
by DukeDavis on Mar 2, 2007 2:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
2001 is where we screwed up big time, and if it was jefferson, johnson and arenas then, that would be too many wings, as we already have PP..Maybe Duke is right that had we made d right selection then, Big al might not drop with us in 2004, and maybe even gerald…the past is the past as we can now only see in hindsight the mistakes we make in the draft…that is the reason why scouts should do their homework very well so players like Redd, Arenas don’t drop too far down.
by bopna on Mar 2, 2007 8:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Regarding a prevous post, I have to say I get really annoyed when posters in here compress or combine different and often contrasting posts by people and then act like it’s one person saying two different things or being hypocritical. When someone criticizes Pitino, that’s all he’s doing. When there’s no reference to Ainge, that doesn’t mean he’s praising Ainge. I hate it when people put words in people’s mouths in here. Stop succumbing to the white noise of a thousand posts and deal with them individually instead of saying “the people on this board” — it’s a huge brushstroke comment.
by Big_Easy on Mar 2, 2007 7:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m watching the KU/Texas game, first half so far, and Durant is going off! I hope we somehow land him. I would rather build around himand get young talent to surround (hopefully Oden/Durant), big AL, and Gerald Green then to try to make a run with Pierce and trading out of the pick (like last year), etc to get veteran help.
by bceltfan on Mar 3, 2007 12:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
























