Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Graphical Look At Percentages

Numbers don't always tell the whole story. If you are like me, sometimes you just have to see it to understand. In that spirit, I thought I'd lay out the lottery chances graphically. The numbers are based on this Wikipedia entry and for the sake of this exercise I'm depicting the end result to be the Griz get the worst record and we get the 2nd worst with some yet unnamed team getting the 3rd worst record.

Here is a graph showing a brief outline of each team's chances to land each pick stacked up against each other. The thing that surprises me is that both of the bottom 2 teams have a better chance at getting the 4th pick than any other single pick.

oddsall.jpg

oddscgrizpicks.jpg

oddsceltspicks.jpg

odds3rdpicks.jpg

Of course few of us are really that concerned with the difference between the top pick and the second pick. Likewise, most could care less what the odds of getting the 3rd pick are vs. the 4th pick. All that matters in this draft is "are we in the top 2?" It is the haves and have-nots. Here is the breakdown of chances for each team.

oddsgriz.jpg

oddscelts.jpg

odds3rd.jpg

So those worried about losing the 2nd worst record are worried about the difference between those last two graphs.

Just something to ponder going into the Bobcats game.

(Of course this could be moot if one or both of the top picks decide to hit the books another year) 

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I love the graphs, Jeff, and I know you put a lot of hard work into this. Still, the odds in that wikipedia article aren’t correct for the #3 pick. That article uses numbers from the ‘05-’06 draft. That year, the third and fourth worst teams had the same record, meaning their ping pong balls were averaged. Because of that, the 138 chances isn’t the accurate number of ping pong balls the #3 team will get, unless they again tie with the #4 team this season.

I’m not sure what the actual number of chances will be, but without a tie, the odds will be greater than 13.8%. All that being said, I think we all get the point of your post; the graphical images make it that much more powerful, and this game against Charlotte is a “must lose”.

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 20, 2007 6:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeff nice work, Does anyone think the Celtics management will trade their draft pick after the lottery drawing if they come in 3rd in the lottery with Oden and Durant in the draft. Or if Durant comes out and Oden doesn’t or vice versa will the celtics do the same, trade the second lottery pick for a experienced player from another team. Thanks

by CelticsWin on Mar 20, 2007 6:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Nothing like a good pie chart to start the day — how many other bloggers both know their Shakespeare and are a fiend with Excel?

by Green Pride on Mar 20, 2007 7:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Let’s suppose that we do get the #3-5 pick, which we see is much more likely than the #1-2 pick. Let’s also suppose that McHale and Bird demand too high a price for KG and JO to make trading a reasonable option. All year I’ve been assuming that it will be crucial to use this year’s draft to acquire a true big man, since it’s so rare to have a such a high pick and we so desperately need size. If we don’t get a decent big man this year, I’m afraid it will be years before we get another shot at one. But, aside from Oden and Durant, all the potential college big men I’ve seen have glaring weaknesses. Noah and Horford look to me like they can be solid NBA defenders/rebounders but offer very little offensively except garbage hoops. Hawes is very impressive offensively but lacks the strength and quickness to be an effective NBA defender. As already discussed on this blog, Brandan Wright plays too soft and Hibbert doesn’t look like a significant improvement over Perk. And, while I haven’t seen Splitter, his back problems and potential contractual complications may make him too risky a pick, regardless of his skill level. The only guy I’ve seen who looks to me like a potential NBA star on both ends of the court is Julian Wright, but he’s only 6’8", although he has a huge wing span. Which brings me to my question: In today’s NBA, can a 6’8" guy with a huge wing span who plays hard and has a high basketball IQ be an effective power forward? In other words, would a lineup consisting of an undersized center in Jefferson, and undersized power forward in Julian Wright, and undersized small forward in Pierce, an undersized point guard in Rondo, and possibly an undersized shooting guard in West (if Allen can’t make a comeback) be an effective starting unit, or would they be dominated by bigger teams? Could we go with that starting unit against small and midsized teams, and against big teams put Perk at center with Wright at small forward and Pierce at shooting guard? Or do we absolutely have to acquire a true big man this summer regardless of his flaws?

Disclaimer: Once again, this all assumes we don’t get #1-2, and a reasonable trade for KG or JO isn’t available.

by Oscar Gamble on Mar 20, 2007 7:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Brandan Wright is not “soft”. He’s a physical player who excels on the defensive end, and who has a very good inside game. Question his “motor”, if you want — some on this blog seem to — but it’s non-sensical to call him “soft”.

by Roy_Hobbs on Mar 20, 2007 7:43 AM EDT reply actions  

  I still like Hibbard! Have only seen twice but he dominated both times. Looked better then Oden if fact. Quite a bit better. We really don’t need another high scoring post player, but really do need the defensive intimidation. Either Oden or Hibbard will give us that.

by Wilt on Mar 20, 2007 7:52 AM EDT reply actions  

  Oops! Almost forget Jeff! Very nice job on the graphic displays and I’m sure it was a LOT of work.

by Wilt on Mar 20, 2007 7:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Chad Ford said that if Durant and Oden don’t declare, the C’s and Griz will have to be stopped from organizational suicide.

by Luke Middleton on Mar 20, 2007 7:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Going to start the conspiracy talk now.

If Charlotte finishes with the third worst record, I guarantee that the NBA will fix it so that Jordan gets one of the top two picks!

by boscel33 on Mar 20, 2007 8:04 AM EDT reply actions  

The more I have been pondering this, the more I have come to realize that this team simply needs a player that can help immediately. That is why Oden is the consensus #1 above all of the other stuff — he will help ANY team immediately because he has an NBA body already and will make an impact on defense in his rookie season. The same can not be said of Durant. Durant, as good as he is, isn’t as good as Lebron James coming out of high school, IMO. I don’t think he will help a team to the same degree that James did as a wing player – he needs to work on his body and he plays no defense at all. I do think in 3 years, he will be jaw-droppingly good but I don’t see him helping a team his rookie year beyond that of a 10-12 ppg contribution off the bench (and giving up at least that much). The question then remains, if we don’t get EITHER of them, the Celtics still need that someone that can give immediate help. Someone you can plug in to the team and know that your team is better instantly by having that guy; he fills a role that didn’t exist before or does it better than the guy you had doing it last year. Conventional wisdom says that anyone beyond Oden and Durant is going to just be another young pup in the Celtics’ stable and won’t help immediately, and therefore a trade is preferred. What other draftees do you see helping the C’s in filling an immediate need — not someone we will have to wait 3 years for a la Gerald Green?

by dobbs on Mar 20, 2007 8:31 AM EDT reply actions  

If we dont get top 2….

I guess Brandan Wright, Julian Wright, Al Hortford or Joakim Noah seem to be the next tier guys. I guess I would throw who ever we get in there with Perk and Kandi. Get them in there banging with Al & Clifford Ray and see what pans out. Size in the middle to help Al with defense, rebounds and keep the double teams down a little.

by GreenBalls on Mar 20, 2007 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

I hate this whole chance and lottery business. I wish we could just automatic get the number 2. Yeah I know it eliminates chances at number 1 but i would take that.

Good Graph. Nice Job Jeff.

by ManUp on Mar 20, 2007 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Excel graphs and charts are not my favorite thing to see first thing in the morning on this site (I make my living using it trying to keep physicians focused on the pretty colors and not the numbers) – Jeff you promised long ago – no math!!!!

Please remember this (just like in Po-ker and in all other things in life)

Fate takes an upper hand.

Some #1’s work out (Tim Duncan) and some number ones don’t (Kandi Man and and some guy named Ralph Sampson are but two examples).

and if Fate doesn’t take the upper hand – Stern will on the grassy knoll.

So sit back, relax and watch “Tinkering Doc” seal our fate.

Can you graph for me the logic Doc uses during game time in lineups? Not enough colors I suppose.

Peace

by Master Po on Mar 20, 2007 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

if we don’t land a top 2 pick or oden and/or durant stay: acie law or mike conley jr (assuming THEY come out) please.

by mikeford on Mar 20, 2007 9:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeff, can you do a pie chart graphically then and Rurante chances that Rivers will be coaching the team next year? That’s more relevant to the success of the team than their drafting position.

As for the draft, nothing in the NCAA tournament has altered my view that after Oden and Durant, the best players in this draft are Julian Wright and Tiago Splitter. Brandon Rush is also better than I thought he was. Noah has disappointed me— he does not have an NBA offensive game— and I fear that Brandan Wright is the second coming of Marvin Williams. As for Acie Law, he’s the same player as Alan Ray, so why bother? I also think that Durant has been exposed as a skilled but immature perimeter player. I’d easily take Oden over him.

by Brickowski on Mar 20, 2007 9:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Sorry Had a little trouble using my laptop, which sometimes displaces text. The first sentence above should read “…graphically depicting the chances that Rivers…”

by Brickowski on Mar 20, 2007 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Say we get the 4th pick. Am I the only one who thinks Noah will help right away. Sure, he’s not Oden or Durant but he’s 7’ feet and mobil. Wouldn’t he be the choice to cover Nowitzki or Wallace in Detroit. Someone with high energy who can block shots, pass, move his feet and play defense. He has played three years of college ball.

Let’s go on Oscar Gamble premise that we draft 3rd or 4th and JO and Garnett aren’t available.
Who else would you give up, for the rights to Wright or Noah?

by Little D on Mar 20, 2007 9:39 AM EDT reply actions  

My apologies on the previous post.

 Who could you get, in a trade, for Wright or Noah?

What would be considered equal value for Wright or Noah?

by Little D on Mar 20, 2007 10:29 AM EDT reply actions  

No your not the only one who think Noah would help right away. I think Noah will help right away second only to Oden. Talk like that will bring some hate here but Noah is a PERFECT fit imho and would play 30 minutes next to Al and put up 12/12, 2 blocks, 2 steals and few to’s. Now, if I had to pick a top five, I would have him 5th, after Oden, Durant, Splitter, and Julian Wright, but i think Noah helps the 2nd most right away, but if on another team never does much at all, not a good offensive player, (but BOY can he run the floor and pass!), but he has everything we need here

by wahz on Mar 20, 2007 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Noah could also help right away. Put him in as the starting 5. His defense, rebounding, and energy alone would help this team. His offense is not great, but we usually don’t have a problem scoring. We need a defensive minded big man with energy. So while obviously Oden and Durant are the top 2, if we ended up with Noah I would still be happy. I just don’t think we need anymore 6’6"-6’9" undersized forwards. We already have Pierce, Wally, Green, Gomes, Tony Allen to fill those positions nicely. Our focus should be a pg or C.

by GoGreen17 on Mar 20, 2007 11:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Arrrrrgggggggg no more graphics………This is the last place on earth i ll want to see a graphic ……my escape from a full of graphics work………..

Good work Jeff ;)

by Edgar on Mar 20, 2007 11:02 AM EDT reply actions  

2008 final: oden vs yao. rockets vs celtics. oden will bring us rings…..

by tommyfan on Mar 20, 2007 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

The graphs & charts are a bit ridiculous…

We all know there is little hope at the #1 or #2 pick.

But little hope is better than NO hope I suppose.

by mcpu40 on Mar 20, 2007 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

by the way, if I get some updated numbers to fix the issue that Roy Hobbes brought up then I’ll update the graphs and post a new set

by Jeff Clark on Mar 20, 2007 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

   It looks like Griz have about a 42% chance of getting one of the top2 and Celts have about a 35. But the odds of getting the 3rd after somebody else has the top 2 picks has got to be different than listed. the Griz can get no worse than 4th, and after the top 2 picks have been made their chance of getting the 3rd pick must be better than 17. Clearly their chance of getting the 4th pick after the other 3 picks have been made is 100%. Nobody really cares whats after the top 2, but there is some talent. I’d assume Ainge will peddle the pick and listen to offers for any of the picks. Many of these lottery picks are not making anyone too excited. Noah, McRoberts, Brandon Wright, all look to be a long way from NBA ready. Noah particularly has zero offense, and limited muscle. McRoberts is a 6-11 Mike Dunleavy, another PG wannabe. And Brandon Wright needs about 30 lbs and 2 years of growth. But Horsford, Julian Wright, and also Green and Hibbert from GTown are all players. Hibbert has a long way to go, but he impressed me during the BC game.

by VT Bill on Mar 20, 2007 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

IMHO Hibbert is Perk all over again, just a little bigger. Did BC have anyone on the floor over 6’7"?

by Little D on Mar 20, 2007 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Ive said it since we were about 9 games into our losing streak and i continue to say it almost once or twice a day. The Celtics will be picking number 4 in this years draft.

by pearljammer10 on Mar 20, 2007 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

pearljammer10, NO, they’ll pick @ 5.

by mcpu40 on Mar 20, 2007 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Does it really matter what pick we get in the draft, Ainge will screw it up anyway. How does he still have a job???

by Donny McFarland on Mar 20, 2007 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree almost 100% with Brickowski, except that I read on DX yesterday that J.Wright isn’t coming out; he’s due to graduate after his Junior year and is coming back to play that year. Also, I’d put Hawes right up there at the top of my list.

I’m interested in those who think Noah would be a good fit, because frankly I tend to disagree with that. My thinking is, Al ideally would be paired with a big who can hit the outside shot: a PF if you think Al is an undersized 5, a C if you think he’s a 4. I think he’s a 4, so my top players (After the Big Two) are Splitter and Hawes. Splitter (I have gotten criticized for this B4) is ready to start right now; he’s been playing on a top team against grown men in Europe for 3 years. He’s ready. Fire away!

by Eeyore III on Mar 20, 2007 2:34 PM EDT reply actions  

With the 32nd pick, the Boston Celtics select?

by Little D on Mar 20, 2007 2:37 PM EDT reply actions  

With the 32nd pick, the Boston Celtics select?

how about Marc Gasol?
http://draftexpress.com/viewprofile.php?p=155

by Jeff Clark on Mar 20, 2007 2:47 PM EDT reply actions  

What’s his wingspan?

If you move Ryan Gomes, How about Glen Davis?

by Little D on Mar 20, 2007 3:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Jeff, It’s good to see that you’re as beserk as I am about this lottery business…
I think three things are at least interesting as concerns this lottery…
1. Only two teams with the worst record have picked first since 1990: Cleveland, 03, and Orlando, 04…that’s 2 out of 16 years!!!
2. If, per chance, a fella or fellette were into praying, pray first that we win it all, or if that’s impossible, then Memphis (worst record?) wins it all. If the worst team wins, their balls are no longer viable in the lotto…thus if Memphis were to win, our chances at two become 199/750, where as, if the fifth worst team were to win, our chances at the second pick then becomes 199/912…I’ll let you guys do the math, but at least it’s easy to see that on the second draw, there would be an additional 162 different losing combinations available…
And thirdly, a team can drop a maximum of three spots in the draft, i. e., 1 can drop to four and 2 to 5, and 3 to 6 etc…that’s why it’s of utmost importance that we don’t go hog-wild and blow passed the tanking Charlottes of the world…The fates have seen to it that we legitimately have fallen to the second worst winning percentage in basketball…It is only befitting that we make sure we remain there now that the competition has for all intents and purposes extinquished of natural causes…Let the “Tinkering” continue…or, as the Bard said in Troilus and Cressida, “Perseverance keeps thine honor bright; To have done is to hang quite out of fashion like a rusty mail in monumental mockery…” We must stay the course…What was once B’ball has metamorphosed: It is now Chess…and deservedly so…
PS. That “rusty mail” is armor, not love letters in the sand…

by BoundingRounder on Mar 20, 2007 4:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m with Little D and wahz. I like Noah for this team. He reminds me of Kirilenko, who I loved until his disappearing act this year. Noah runs, plays wide, tall D, passes pretty well, sets picks, upbeat attitude, and doesn’t need the ball – a Perk with agility. Perk has a definite role on this team even though his skills are slow coming. He has spirit, dedication and is Al’s bud. Keep him around and keep Clif Ray working with him and he’ll be the best #2 center in the league.

by Wildblu1 on Mar 20, 2007 5:38 PM EDT reply actions  

“IMHO Hibbert is Perk all over again, just a little bigger. Did BC have anyone on the floor over 6’7”"

What are you talking about? Have you even seen Hibbert play (or Perk for that matter)?!

Im not a fan of taking Hibbert, but there really are very few similarities. Hibbert is 7’2, slow, and unathletic, but very very smart, polished, and a great passer in the post. He finishes well inside, and has a pretty nice touch from the FT line. He is also a smart defensive player, and a solid rebounder on both sides.

The only similarities between Perk and Hibbert are that they play center, and are above average rebounders and shotblockers.

by ucn33 on Mar 20, 2007 6:20 PM EDT reply actions  

ucn33
Hibbert is 7’2, slow, and unathletic,
 
That’s exactly what I talking about. I did state he was bigger than Perk.

I guess I should have clarified, I was responding to a previous post by Wilt.

by Little D on Mar 20, 2007 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Can we get a scouting report on Marc Gasol? He looks to be the exact same height/weight as Pau.

by Fred Roberts on Mar 20, 2007 7:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Tomorrow’s game against the Bobcats is easily the most critical game of the year. That being said, I am certain that if we beat them, we will pass them (or they will pass us) in the standings and we will certainly end up at #3. If we lose to them, I am reasonably confident that we won’t we able to make up 5 games in the win column in the last 14 games.

by jonnyor on Mar 20, 2007 7:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?
Small
MVP's in Game7

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi