One Man's Idea: Trade For Marion
Section F Sports came up with a trade proposal to consider and wrote a long, thought out post about it. Here's the idea:
Phoenix Gives Up: Shawn Marion, Marcus Banks, and the #29 pick
Boston Gives Up: the #5 pick, Theo Ratliff's expiring $12 million contract (in 2008), Delonte West, Kendrick Perkins, and their first round pick in 2008
Here is part of his explanation for Phoenix:
Maybe Phoenix can get better player for Marion, but it is hard to see them gaining more depth, youth, and financial flexibility. The #5 pick could net them a very exciting young big man, as mentioned above. I happen to believe that Wright and Horford are going to be sweet NBA players and remember, those guys (or Yi or Noah or whoever) presented a very exciting "best case scenario" about 12 hours ago for Phoenix. The Suns also get their precious luxury tax relief 12 months from now.
I know we've seen this movie in regards to Banks, but here's his thoughts on that:
As for Boston, they would have to bring Marcus Banks back, but that is required to make the deals work. But the Celtics would gain a star in Marion that would help them win right now and allow them to roll out a pretty nice starting lineup of Rajon Rondo, Paul Pierce, Ryan Gomes, Shawn Marion, and Al Jefferson.
There's more, but you can click the link above to get his full article.
This is the part where you pick apart the proposal from 100 different angles and critique the writer and offer your own ideas. Let 'er rip.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yay, this is definitely a good one! I feel slightly better, but optimism is still hard to digest at this point.
by AllabouttheGREEN on May 23, 2007 7:17 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t think Boston gets enough. Seriously. Marion only has a couple years left on his contract, then he will bolt Boston, and Cs will be left empty handed. I rather keep the #5, keep next years pick, keep West and Perk and wait for some team to come asking for Theo in November or so. There is no need to jump the gun.
Way to much to give up for Marion. No thanks.
by Mr_Sinister on May 23, 2007 7:27 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t see Marion as that good of a player outside of the Phoenix system. Boston doesn’t and can’t run that type of offense, devoid of a player like Nash. IMO, he’s just not going to make this a much better team than it would be otherwise. I’m for keeping the pick if he’s the best we can do.
by TNCeltic on May 23, 2007 7:30 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t want to bring Banks back and I don’t want to give up Perk.
by FLCeltsFan @ CelticsBlog on May 23, 2007 7:31 PM EDT reply actions
It´s too much for marion, i´ll make this offer for a big guy like Gasol o JO not for a 6-7 sf or pf. And I have serious doubts about the level of marion without nash running the offense.
by SpanishCeltic on May 23, 2007 7:31 PM EDT reply actions
It might be too much, but it can always be scaled back. Perkins and West are clearly ballast to make Phoenix feel better about trading Marion, but if Marion doesn’t have as much value, those guys can just be taken away. Same with the future pick (I see the author has already updated and pulled that pick off the hypothetical bargaining table). If it seems like too much, that can be fixed by giving up less. If Marion is just flawed and undesirable, that is another matter. But it seems that Pierce would much rather have a proven All-Star as his running mate than another rookie and a 11-man rotation. Pull either West or Perkins and the future pick and I think this is a great deal.
by I Love CT on May 23, 2007 7:32 PM EDT reply actions
Also, Marion was a bad ass long before Nash came to Phoenix. I think it is obvious that Gasol is better, but they would get killed with their interior defense with Pau and Al, and also, I highly doubt Memphis is going to be thrilled about adding another pick outside of the top two. I think the point of this article is that Phoenix might actually want this pick, while to everyone else it seems like dog crap.
by I Love CT on May 23, 2007 7:38 PM EDT reply actions
You guys are missing the point. Do we like Marion? If yes, maybe we can get him. We don’t have to give up all the guys this dude mentions. It is the fact that Phoenix is up against it that makes them a prime trading partner. I personally love the idea of Marion and the 29th pick for the 5th, Theo, and either West or Perkins. Pull out the “Banks for West/Perkins and a future pick” part and I think we are in business. And I’m sure the Suns would want a bit more, but that is why you bargain.
by I Love CT on May 23, 2007 7:59 PM EDT reply actions
Listen to Eye of the Sports Guy today. Interviewed Paul Shirley. He tends to think that Marion’s success is largely due to the system. He doesn’t work on things after practice, but floats on natural ability (which he has plenty of). He’s not a guy who will lead by example (like Delonte). Without a commitment to an uptempo game, Marion’s skills would be wasted.
And I don’t want Banks 2.0 (same as 1.0, but far more expensive). Don’t like the deal.
I’d, at least, also want the right to the other pick they can have this year [in the 20s]. we can then either take it now or wait.
by jarobiso on May 23, 2007 8:00 PM EDT reply actions
No No No. How does Marion make us better? He’s undersized and would force Jefferson to stay at the 5 or force Pierce to the 2. And he whines so freaking much. We need a bigger difference maker like KG.
by orrzor on May 23, 2007 8:27 PM EDT reply actions
Perk is a good outlet passer, and Delonte a good all-around player, but neither would be at their best in the style the Suns play — and the Suns are a smart enough team to actually take things like that into account. On our side, Marion is a skilled player and especially appealing from a defensive standpoint, but that would give us a lot of similar players on the offensive end.
If we could do something like Theo, Gomes and the #5 pick for Marion I’d think hard about it. But I’d think harder about something centered around Wally and the #5 for Kirilenko.
I’m with redvision on this one. I think we can swing a sign and trade for Rashard Lewis at a cheaper price and get a good inside-out combination between him and Big Al. I think we could probably sign him to something in the area of 3 years 42 mil and send the Seattle theo’s contract plus either Gerald or the fifth pick and toss in gomes.
Two words, Nash Factor. Marion looks great playing with Nash where he always gets the ball in perfect position. The Celtics have no one like Nash to feed Marion. He wouldn’t be half the play in Boston he is in Pheonix. No way would I give up the rights to possibly Yi or Hortford or Conelly for Marion. And next year’s first as well? That is highway robbery. Byrdman is right. You could get Rashard Lewis at a cheaper price. You could get Lewis for three years 42 Million and do a sign and trade for Theo, Gerald Green, their choice of Gomes or West plus Scal to make the salaries work. Seattle is loosing Lewis to free agency anyway. That deal would give them an 11 million dollar expiring contract and two decent rotation guys. You could even throw in the Celtics second round pick, likly to be a player who would have gone in the first round last year but goes in the second this year at a non-gaurenteed cheap price to make it even better for Seattle. The deal would give Seattle the cap flexibility to start building around Durrant. It would give the Celtics a 23 ppg scorer to put with Pierce and allow them to get Hortford or Connely or Yi in the draft. A lineup of Al, Pierce, Rondo, Lewis and Perk might not play great defense but it would score on anyone and be very exciting to watch. I like that deal a lot better than trading for Marion at this price.
by JohnCK on May 23, 2007 9:05 PM EDT reply actions
We are dreaming if we think we are getting Lewis. Portland has Randolph to offer and Lewis loves McMillan. It is either stand pat with the pick and stay young, or make a play on a guy like Marion. Yes, he has some flaws, but what available player doesn’t? And don’t say KG, because he’s not available according to McHale. I love the Nash Factor comments. Go back and check Marion’s #s before Nash got there. Then note that he can play both forward positions and guard all of them. I like the option mentioned above: #5, Theo, and Gomes.
by I Love CT on May 23, 2007 11:25 PM EDT reply actions
lets not get in the habit of taking back our castoffs.
Plus way too much to give up for an ugly shooting system player. And that does not help us in the 4/5 department, it only makes it worse.
Go get Gasol. Griz are selling the team, and with no Oden/Durant, they may be willing to cut salary and start fresh. Theo, #5, and Gomes. If they want more, anything but AJ, RR, PP.
by cos on May 24, 2007 12:06 AM EDT reply actions
Brutal trade. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don’t think Marion is a difference maker. He is just a fantasy stat sheet stuffer.
I just don’t feel he is a good enough player. I watch Phoeix alot. He gets an awful lot of point in transition, off hustle, and being setup by Nash.
He is a product of the system.
by jfs1000d on May 24, 2007 12:56 AM EDT reply actions
The problem with this is that we will be in the luxury tax next year when Big Al’s raise kicks in next year. Wyc has refused to pay the tax so it is unlikely that he will be willing to deal Theo for a longer contract. If we deal Theo, it will likely be another Rodney Rogers situation, we add a guy who’s signed for one year whom we then can’t re-sign without going into the luxury tax so we end up losing him.
Realistically, Wally, #5, Green, West, and Allen (or Rondo if we can get back a better PG) are our main trade pieces {unless we decide to take Pierce or Jefferson off of the untouchables list}.
I think the c’s should just draft the 5th pick. If Brewer falls to them, they should take him. I would like to think that at the least the c’s would be able to put some type of package trade involving Brewer or Gerald Green. This trade might not come until after the season starts. So many gm’s are very high on Brewer that he would serve as serious trade bait. This could get us the all star big man that we are all craving.
I think that 20 games into the season a lot of people will be talking about Gerald Green. He is going to be a stud, and it will be shown this season.
by modawg3434 on May 24, 2007 1:54 AM EDT reply actions
I keep the #5 pick and rebuild. I don’t think Marion’s game fits with the Celts, just like Telfair/Rondo plan to be a running team this year backfired. With Pierce,Big Al, Wally, and even Gomes we are more a half court team. Marion is a good player but it is Nash and the Sun system that makes him special.
Thus, I pass on Marion.
by bceltfan on May 24, 2007 2:37 AM EDT reply actions
Marion has dissapeared twice in the playoffs against the Spurs. He isnt worth breaking the bank for.
by havlicekstoletheball on May 24, 2007 4:19 AM EDT reply actions
Well, here we go. This is ridiculous. FLCeltsFan, says it succinctly and correctly. And there were plenty of comments that Marion is not the guy we need.
FLCeltsFan said:
I don’t want to bring Banks back and I don’t want to give up Perk.
We need to add probably two quality players (vet or draft) to the team and need to move some people off the roster (could be done with non-guaranteed contracts). We forget that we are getting better and shouldn’t allow last season’s record to influence us. I would, take the best athlete available at #5 and keep him. I would look at the free agent market and try to pick up a position player (pg, or big) on a short, low-cost contract (as a temporary measure). Extend Al Jefferson. After that I would explore realistic trades to get a quality player (which I think will be tough), or to get additional draft choices. I don’t think the blockbuster deal is out there that will put us over the top. We need to depend on our current core players to get better individually, for them to play better together, and to hope for some luck as to health and maybe a draft pick turning out to be a winner.
Another thought. Phoenix has turmoil. Stoudemire did not show up for the final meeting. Nash said something to the effect, we have chemistry issues. Since Colangelo left, they haven’t made one good move. Or you could say they have made three bad moves.
Trading last years pick and not drafting Rondo, trading their 2nd pick and not drafting Sergio Rodgriuez and signing Marcus Banks. Maybe, just maybe they are right for the taking.
Do this deal for Stoudamire, but not Marion. Marion is a very good player, but not great…amazing, there was so much talk about us trading the rights to Durant and Theo for Stoudamire and the #5 pick (where Phoenix may have ended up with Atl pick) – now we have to give up the whole farm to get a lesser player from the same team- the draft really did suck!
Shawn Marion still performed at a high level Pre Steve Nash. The team didnt fair as well but the system was definitely different (offensive averaged 94 ppg). Check your history first before saying marion was nothing before Nash. Nash does need finishers to be successful and Marion is one of the best finishers in the game.
03-04 19.0 ppg, 9.3 rpg, 2.7 apg, 2.1 spg, 1.3 bpg
02-03 21.2 ppg, 9.5 rpg, 2.4 apg, 2.3 spg, 1.2 bpg
01-02 19.1 ppg, 9.9 rpg, 2.0 apg, 1.8 spg, 1.1 bpg
all years less than 2.0 turnovers per game too.
Since Nash has been there his shooting percentage has gone up and he was able to rebound the ball more because he didnt have to support the offensive flow. Nash allowed him to roam more getting rebounds. Nash made him more efficient offensively but he still was a major player before Nash. Dont get it twisted.
by jimmywolfrey on May 24, 2007 9:35 AM EDT reply actions
I forgot to mention.
His point guard during those years were:
Stephon Marbury
by jimmywolfrey on May 24, 2007 9:36 AM EDT reply actions
PATIENCE!!!!!!!
When are we going to learn? Too much to give up for a player that looks good since he has the best PG in the NBA.
Also, it would leave us too vulnerable for rebounding. Who plays back-up for Jefferson when he needs rest or is in foul trouble? Jefferson is a PF not an NBA center so putting him into this other position will lessen his development.
We need to improve defensively not offensively. I like the thought of dropping down and getting Jeff Green and exchange Celts 5 pick with let’s say the 10 slot(Kings)and get Ron Artest and fill-in with other players to make the money match-up.
Adding Artest and Green would make this team stronger and better defensively.
Theo’s contract, Perk and Dwest is too much? Take off the green tinted sunglasses kids. What did Perk do last year? What did Theo do last year? Sure, it would be sad for Delonte to move on, but we cannot stand pat. I’ll do this deal tomorrow if I could.
by Bleedgreen on May 24, 2007 3:37 PM EDT reply actions
Bleedgreen,last year Perk shut down just about every big he guarded while playing on one foot. In one game Shaq scored 20 against him, but only 2 in the 2nd half because Perk wore him down. He did alot more. You can’t judge Perk by stats. He knows the defense and often (Perk says always) tells Al where to be. He runs from under the basket to the 3 point line to to contest shots. He’s the best outlet passer on the team and is becoming one of the better passers in general. And he’s improved on not getting into early foul trouble.
Fortunately whoever Section F Sports is has nothing to do with Celtic personnel moves. Best I can say is that the proposed trade grades about an F. I apologize for using that all too obvious line. It gives up a ridiculous amount. Not worthy of further comment. It’s not like we’re a player away and Marion isn’t that player if we were.
by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 25, 2007 12:00 AM EDT reply actions
Marion is better than most of you think. I guess no amount of numbers (check out the stats posted above and the stuff the guys at 82games.com did on his defense) will prove that. He is an athletic marvel, the quickest jumper in the league, can guard every position on the floor, and is HUNGRY to prove he can be more than he’s been in Phoenix. Of course he disappears in playoff games – PHX runs pick and roll with Nash and Amare every game. Give the guy a break. I’d be interested what Pierce and Jefferson would say. Play with Marion or another rookie and a 12-man rotation? The C’s need to trim the roster and shrink depth into quality. Perkins, West, the next rookie, etc. – these guys are all rotation players but they aren’t All-Stars. Once again I say that if you read the column, you see the flexibility in the deal. If it feels like Boston is giving up too much, no big deal. The Suns are the team that appear to be up against it right now. Maybe the #5 and Theo’s contract is enough for Marion (no Banks, no Almighty Kendrick Perkins, no West). Wouldn’t that be worth considering? What am I missing here? This seems to be a situation where a legit player is getting no love, while a bunch of scrubs are being viewed as somehow awesome just because they play in Boston. Anyway, I’m still for bringing Marion (or WHOEVER) to town, just a modified version of that proposed trade.
by I Love CT on May 25, 2007 12:21 AM EDT reply actions
I Love CT, If we could get Marion, period, and just give up players who we don’t want to keep and maybe Theo’s contract, fine. I don’t think I’d give up the #5 pick unless there’s no one there on draft day that we want. There probably will be. I would also not give up Perk in a Marion deal. I think Marion played for Danny Ainge so I’m sure Danny knows what he could bring.

































