Daily Links 5/24
Herald   Celts and Grizzlies bear lottery brunt
Doc:Â winning is the answer to the lotto loss
High fives and forgettable fives
Globe    Hibbert stays, Hill goes, Vincent to coach Cats, Oden & Durant on USA team
Prognosis negative
Celtics can't curse their lot over fall, good video interview with Big Al
Loy's Place   I read the news today, oh boy!
Around the mock drafts
SI.com  Behind the scenes of a legendary lottery
Charlotte hires Vincent as coach
Journal Times  Everything could be all Wright for the Bucks
NPRÂ Â A new curse in Boston
AHNÂ Â Â Celtics and Grizzlies search for answers
ESPN Page 2Â Â Simmons:Â Welcome to the next decade of discontent
SouthCoast Today   A fitting end to a ghastly campaign
Bleacher Report   What the Celtics could have done with the number 2 pick
Patriot Ledger  Celtics must make a move, may trade pick  Â
Celtics plight deflates supporters
Dime Mag  Lottery night for Celtics fans
Dowbridge BNÂ Â Â Beware the sports gods' wrath
The Daily News  Celtics punished for past greatness
Hoopsworld   What the lottery results mean to Boston
Miami Herald  Riley joins lottery critics - Karma gets tankers
Philly Inquirer  Tanking is lacking as a lottery strategy
Commercial Appeal   News has Gasol groaning
Worcester Telegram   Celtics need to stir up trade winds
Lowell Sun   All the losing wasn't worth it
Sun Journal   How the Celtics can bounce back from lottery envy
Inside the Bay Area  Western conference gets even deeper in the lottery
Daily News Tribune   The shame of the Celtics
Â
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“Long-suffering fans of perennial losers don’t know what they’re missing. After all, how would they know? You can’t miss steak if you’ve never eaten steak, right? But if you’re fortunate enough to follow a perennially successful franchise, then that same franchise starts decomposing right in front of you … what then?”
I about choked on my coffee when I read that by Simmons. So fans of bad teams don’t really suffer because they have never known a good team? Hmm. I guess then Red Sox fans really had no right to complain for all those decades they stunk because they had never known what a good team was. Only Yankees Cardinals and Dodger fans really knew heartbreak. So I guess when the Red Sox did win it would been pretty stupid for their fans to over react, since they had never known steak anyway, and I don’t know right books with stupid titles like “Now I can die in Peace”. God does Simmons even read this stuff before he writes it? It sucks to be a Celtics fan today but it sucks just as bad to be a Grizzley fan or a Bucks fan.
by JohnCK on May 24, 2007 9:13 AM EDT reply actions
That was the best Al interview that I have ever seen. His confidence both on the court and in front of the media has grown so much.
by AllabouttheGREEN on May 24, 2007 3:20 PM EDT reply actions
If Al was coming out of college this year he’d be the #1 pick. Actually maybe not. He’s probably developed more playing in the NBA than he would have in college. He’s played against much better players in a more complicated system. He wouldn’t be as advanced as he is today if he’d gone to college. Consider that when thinking about Oden and Durant in the immediate future.
You can’t have pride (Celtic Pride) when you’re tanking games. Lesson learned, no tanking ever again!
by bceltfan on May 24, 2007 11:22 PM EDT reply actions
The Celtics players never tanked and they played with more intensity for most all games all season. And they played with more intensity than many of the other lottery teams above them. Loy is very correct in noting that most of the season, the Celtics lineups were dictated by injuries and game circumstances.
The tank stuff is so overblown. All teams in all years do some of what the Celtics did. It’s not tanking. All teams rest players and make changes to give guys experience for the future, especially with a very young team with virtually all its veterans and several of its key young players sidelined for an extraordinary number games with injuries.
As you can see the “tanking” gave the Celtics a greater than 80% chance of not getting the top pick and a greater than 60% chance of not getting either of the first two. And unfortunately probabilities played out as would be predicted pretty much in the long run for all the three lowest ranked teams, as it did for Portland last year and many others other years.
And you can tell someone named JohnCK that the Red Sox have been one of the best and most competitive American League teams in most years since 1967. Its not like they were the Cubs or Indians. They made it interesting and entertaining many years, though they didn’t win four World Series games in a given year until 2004. What kind of fans are these people?
by SteveZ from Edgemont on May 24, 2007 11:47 PM EDT reply actions
Truegreen and Steve Z, trying to debate you guys who think we didn’t tank this season is the equivalent of arguing with those people who claim “Elvis is alive” IMO.
With all due respect, if you don’t think we tanked, then you are telling me the 76ers without Iverson and Webber are a superior team than the Celts? You are going to tell me Doc deserves his extension? You are going to tell me a coach, any coach, in any sport that loses 18 straight games does not deserve to be fired?
Doc told Gomes he was sitting him out the whole 4th Q in a game he was playing well because he didn’t want to hurt our lottery chances. That’s not tanking?
by bceltfan on May 26, 2007 8:18 PM EDT reply actions

by FLCeltsFan @ CelticsBlog on 






























