Ray Allen Offered
Meanwhile, two league sources said the Sonics are calling around the league to gauge interest in guard Ray Allen.
KJR-AM radio reported that the Sonics offered Allen to the Boston Celtics for the fifth pick and Theo Ratliff.
The proposal being negotiated by Seattle and Boston would send Allen to the Celtics for a package including the No. 5 pick, Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West. The last I heard was that Seattle was having second thoughts about the deal: The sticking point was that the Sonics wanted second-year point guard Rajon Rondo instead of West, which led Boston VP Danny Ainge to demand that Seattle also include center Robert Swift in the trade. But Seattle was unwilling to include Swift. It remained to be seen whether the Sonics and Celtics can patch it up.
79 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
pass…this team, as doc rivers was quoted today, accurately assessed the need of SIZE up front. i’ll take my chances on either yi, b. wright, or horford being there at #5 and just stay put…they can grab a shooter at #32 and come away with a good player, although i bet danny makes a move for another late teen, early 20’s pick in this draft as there may be a specific player he wants.
interesting… im not interested in him, but interesting…. why can’t we get offers like that from players we want?
by bleedingreen on Jun 28, 2007 8:06 AM EDT reply actions
For Szczerbiak instead of Ratliff? Allen and WW duplicate each other’s talents.
by Hondo to Rondo on Jun 28, 2007 8:10 AM EDT reply actions
I’d do that trade. The draft, even this years, is always a 50/50 crapshoot. The Celtics could win the division with Pierce/Allen/Jefferson. I wouldn’t be surprised if Ainge squeezed Swift out of them. A 7 footer who likes to get dirty would help the Celtics.
If they’re going to trade for a vet, that ain’t a bad trade. At least the Celtics would be spending 12mil on a guy who actually plays.
by Green Bear on Jun 28, 2007 8:13 AM EDT reply actions
No chance at all of this one happening, IMO.
Ray Allen makes too much money and is too old. I wouldn’t take him straight up in exchange for Theo, never mind adding in the #5.
You simply can’t blow $40 million in salary on two wing players if you expect to contend in this league (Pierce, Ray Allen)
If they took Wally and maybe Telfair (they need a PG if Ridnour is moved) then the experiment might be acceptable – but folks, we are really, really, really going to be in some salary trouble in a couple of years because of Paul’s contract, we just can’t take on a salary like Ray Allen’s – if we do, then say goodbye to several of Tony Allen, West, Green, Gomes.
We’re better of developing Delonte or Gerald at that position and add some size to the frontcourt with whatever money we spend.
by Albin on Jun 28, 2007 8:23 AM EDT reply actions
I think this is a good move because we would not be giving up much and we’d be getting back a solid star to keep Pierce happy and also open up the offense. 32 is not really that old, especially for a sharpshooter. He may have lost a step but he can still drop 40 on any given night.
I would love to see the ball swung around the perimeter from Pierce to Allen or vice versa and nailing threes all day. Go inside to Al, then kick it out, etc. Pierce can drive and dish to Al or out to Allen. No double teams would be seen because they would have three legitimate scoring threats. I don’t care that we have Wally. He sucks and will probably be injured again anyway. We need to get rid of him and maybe one or two other 2/3’s to create more PT for Green. We would probably have to add another player in the mix to make it work (in my opinion) but it’s not a serious issue. I am not in love with any of these players at #5. We need a solid vet like Allen to mix in with the youngsters. That would be a great combo of young and old.
Right, so is there any way trading for Allen and dealing Pierce works out well for the Celtics?
I agree with others that Pierce/Allen is not a great combo, especially considering their salaries. (I don’t, however, think that asking price is very high, so it makes me wonder what the Celtics could get for Pierce.)
I really like Allen, but this just doesn’t make sense for the Celts. If they’d take Wally and return Swift, it makes it more appealing.
Personally, I just value that 5th pick too much. I think that Horford, Conley, Yi, Thornton, Green, etc. will be a huge long-term help to the Celts, at relatively little cap space.
Given that Wally has 2 years and Theo 1 year left on their deals, this organization has a chance to really get its house in order and add good players for its big $ contracts, instead of stiffs. It’s hard to compete when over 1/3rd of your cap space is eaten up by two players who are virtually worthless. Having 2 anchors on a franchise like that makes it difficult for any team to be a contender, if not making it impossible. The key to making this team a long-term contender, is shedding itself of guys like that and being aggressive and yet selective in adding new guys. I really do see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the Celts have to avoid the quick fix, and still have many important decisions to make, starting tonight.
by TNCeltic on Jun 28, 2007 8:48 AM EDT reply actions
Offer them Wally and a future first, lottery protected, and see what happens. If they say no, no big deal because: a.) we need size, not shooters; b.) we don’t need someone nearing the end who is payed a hefty sum.
by jarobiso on Jun 28, 2007 8:54 AM EDT reply actions
I forgot to add: if they’re actually interested in moving him, we might be one of the few teams with the legitimate tools to get it done: salaries, draft picks, and young guys. We actually have a tiny bit of leverage, so Danny might as well play hardball. The worst case scenario is they say no and we don’t have to pay a 32 year old Jesus Shuttlesworth a truckload to sit on the bench injured.
by jarobiso on Jun 28, 2007 8:56 AM EDT reply actions
I like Ray Allen alot, but I’m not giving up the #5 for him. He’s 32 (or will be this year), and is not the piece we need. We need someone with some height, or a vet PG. Even though Lewis is more of a 3, he at least is 6’10, and under 30. You can understand why the Sonics would perfer to move Allen and keep Lewis.
Less than 8 hours to go!
;D
by Real World on Jun 28, 2007 9:03 AM EDT reply actions
how old was jordan when he won his last title? how old was pippen? i’m guessin over 35. allen only has 3 years left so he should still be a machine for those 3 years. if pierce can’t get along wit him then step him real quick
by AdrianoMG6 on Jun 28, 2007 9:13 AM EDT reply actions
why can’t we try to acquire gerald wallace in a sign and trade instead of all these old all stars? we need to keep our pick.
i have high hopes on:
rondo/west
pierce/green/allen
wallace/wally/gomes
jefferson/williams/powe
yi/perk
we’d have to give up some of these players (along with theo) for gerald wallace, but we would be able to keep jefferson, rondo, #5 and i think gerald and tony too.
no deal to old to much money thats why they want to get rid of him
by tmiranda on Jun 28, 2007 9:17 AM EDT reply actions
to paraphrase someone on another board I read, shooting ages well. Look at Reggie Miller, he was productive in an older age. I would Imagine that Ray Allens decline would be much more gentle than KG’s
by gobo on Jun 28, 2007 9:19 AM EDT reply actions
Absurd. No team wanst to carry a contract like Allen’s unless it is in contention. Seattle needs to lose him badly and has little leverage. How about Ray Allen and Bobby Swift for Theo, Telfair, Gerald Green and a 2008 no. 1?
by elrod enchilada on Jun 28, 2007 9:40 AM EDT reply actions
Why do people always seem to want to give away Gerald… Honestly, this guy could be next years Al Jefferson (In terms of improvement of course). I want at least one more year to truly evaluate what Gerald brings to the table! At the very least, he is entertaining as hell to have on the court! I think he can do even more in year #3!
If Horford is gone I really think there’s a good chance the C’s take Noah or trade picks with the B-cats
by whales on Jun 28, 2007 10:09 AM EDT reply actions
Other teams know Danny might take an offer on a veteran so just they take the chance he will say yes even though this deal does not favor the Celtics. There are a few ways to go.
1. Draft our 2 picks and see what happens.
2. Trade 1 or 2 picks move up or down in the lottery.
3. See how the team works out and trade in Feb 2008.
4. Make a minor move and get a couple of role playing veterans
in the league. Nocioni, Blake, Boykins, Maglore, Mihm, PJ Brown,
Joe Smith, Vaughn to name a few.
5. Trade 32 and Theo for cap space for a restricted free agent.
Hughes for the record doesn’t think this deal was ever on the table, he has not been able to confirm it was offered. A host on the radio says a source told him that it was offered. Who knows.
by Scotty on Jun 28, 2007 10:32 AM EDT reply actions
If you could do:
Trade #5 for Philly’s first two picks. Trade a first rounder and Wally for Ray Allen, then I’d be cool with it. The other thing is this deal still lets you make one more deal (say Wally, Gomes, West, Scal for AK47 and Fischer.)
Rondo / Fischer
Allen / Allen
Pierce / #32
AK47 / Williams
Jefferson / Perkins
That would be a pretty nice roster.
i love ray allen, but this deal makes no sense. the only way you pull the trigger on this is if you are on the verge of contending for a title and allen would put you over the top.
his age and contract make no sense for a team like the celtics who are not gonna be contending this season
by dr_awesome on Jun 28, 2007 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
Allen would be a perfect complement for Pierce, but the only way I give them the #5 pick is if the Sonics take BOTH Theo Ratliff and Wally Szczdjkdjkajkasjkasjkiaks contracts.
“If Horford is gone I really think there’s a good chance the C’s take Noah or trade picks with the B-cats”
Noah sucks, so hopefully that doesnt happen. There will be good players available at #5 if in fact Danny does keep the pick.
by ucn33 on Jun 28, 2007 12:24 PM EDT reply actions
You have to make this deal. Allen is a bonafide all star and the team would be in title contention in the East. No, you can’t win with simply two wing players, but we do have a legitimate big man to build around down low. Jefferson would inflate Allen’s #‘s and vice versa. All you’re giving up is Theo Ratliff’s contract and the #5 pick? Come on. Allen hasn’t exactly declined in the last couple years. If anyone is that worried about contracts, Wally Sczerbiak suddenly becomes more expendable. The notion that all Allen does is shoot 3’s is also inaccurate.
Old UConn guy coming back to New England. Intriguing. He missed 26 games last year though. I know the Sonics -like the C’s – were tanking at the end, but still. He also takes 21 shots a game. That’s about 3 more shots per game than Pierce. Just wondering how well he would work with Pierce and Jefferson on the offensive end, which is Allen’s strength. He’s certainly not a defensive stopper.
by DJ to Bird on Jun 28, 2007 1:20 PM EDT reply actions
He isnt by any means a selfish player. Seattle was terrible offensively last year, so the shots per game…as well as his points per game…were a bit inflated. I dont think either he or Pierce will have any trouble working together offensively.
Obviously, the big concern if this deal were to go through…other than age and health…would be the defense.
by ucn33 on Jun 28, 2007 1:24 PM EDT reply actions
This is completely unrrelated, but I need to voice my frustration…
If we waste the 32nd pick on a big, useless Euro like Stanko Barac (as we are rumored to be doing), I will kill somebody. In a draft with this kind of depth, there are going to be a few quality players hanging around at 32. If the Celtics draft Zabian Dowdell, I will piss myself with glee. If they take Taurean Green, Demetris Nichols, or Glen Davis, I’ll be happy. If they take a big, slow, doofy guy who’s undoubtedly still dealing with the psychological trauma of being named Stanko, I will never forgive Danny Ainge.
by gjohnson88 on Jun 28, 2007 1:29 PM EDT reply actions
I disagree gjohnson88
First, there is a chance (very slim) that someone like Splitter or Rudy Fernandez will slip into the second round. Fernandez is 21 years old and simply the best player in Europe, and Splitter is by far the best young big man in Europe. Along with Fernandez, Splitter may be the most NBA-ready player in this draft.
Second, there are some VERY good prospects in Europe, starting with two guys: Kopponen, a 19 year-old point guard, and Kyrylo Fesenko, a legitimate 7 footer who is suprisingly athletic and who is basically the same player as Noah. There is also Marc Gasol, another 7 footer who has less upside but more experience.
Third, there are some intruiging projects in Europe, starting with Joao Gomes, the Brazilian who has been playing Portugal and who has the same basic skillset as Dorell Wright. The Celtics worked him out this week. And my sources tell me that the Lithuanian Renaldis Sebiutis (I probably misspelled that) may be the best shooter in the draft.
So what’s wrong with leaving a guy in Europe and saving a little money as opposed to sending a guy to the developmental league?
Are you guys crazy? I’m tired of waiting for the Celtics to be good “in the future”. You have a chance to get the best pure shooter in the NBA for the #5 pick (which is surely not guaranteed to produce an all-star). We can contend for the Finals for the next 3 years with Pierce, Allen, and Jefferson. We have enough young guys. And you don’t want Ray Allen because you’re afraid you won’t be able to sing Tony Allen? Come on! Stop overrating the Celtics young players as we’ve always done. Tony Allen wouldn’t play on most good NBA teams.
by AdCam on Jun 28, 2007 3:21 PM EDT reply actions
Wally, #5 and ‘lonte would be a pretty good deal imo. I’d say if Theo’s contract was in the deal, but this is a no-brainer.
And what is this about how Ray Allen and Pierce would not be a good combo?? Says who?? They un-selfish players, that don’t live for the lime-lite. That in itself is great grounds for a combo-relationship.
I’d probably make the Wally/5/Delonte trade. We’d need to find a backup PG though. But Rondo for Swift? Please tell me Ainge isn’t that stupid.
by jarobiso on Jun 28, 2007 4:18 PM EDT reply actions
i agree with AdCam. let’s start putting some tangible value on players. maybe you roll the dice with one or two of these younger players in the “hope he pans out well” game, but with 4, 5 players?! naw… cash a few of them in for a guy who has tangible skill now. i was for the iverson deal, i was for the garnett deal, and now i’m for the ray allen deal. give me some TANGIBLE talent! upside is SO overrated.
by hapa17 on Jun 28, 2007 4:39 PM EDT reply actions
The Sonics goal is to dump salary. Theres no way they dump 1 and take 2 huge ones back. I’d do it though. It makes for a way better team next year which is kinda the point right??? If we dump Szerbs, then the contracts negate each other. We would need a backup point though.
by docholidayisback on Jun 28, 2007 4:43 PM EDT reply actions
I like this move. By the way, it is Ian [/b]Thomsen [b], not Thompson!
by WalkingThroughThatDoor on Jun 28, 2007 4:44 PM EDT reply actions
my name is Jesus! YEAH!!
and i am the man! YEAH!!
sup with these questions?! YEAH!!
about my plans!! ROLE CALL!!!!
by bucknersrevenge on Jun 28, 2007 4:47 PM EDT reply actions
I hope they don’t trade Rondo. I think he could be their PG for the next 10 years. Him and Jefferson should be the only young guys they don’t look to trade.
by AdCam on Jun 28, 2007 4:50 PM EDT reply actions
I wish these people who threaten to leave the C’s do so. We dont need fair weather fans in Celtic Nation.
by Pierre71 on Jun 28, 2007 6:38 PM EDT reply actions
I’ve been a fan for more than 40 (almost 50) years. If this trade that ESPN reported as a “done deal” immediately before the Durant pick occurs, I will finally have had it. If true, this once proud franchise will be turning into the basketball equivalent of the Cubs except that they will be the not so lovable losers. Not since Curtis Rowe and Sidney Wicks will the Celtics have paired two so overrated players who, needing the basketball in their hands and having such a poor concept of team play, will kill all hope. To trade out of the lottery for a another overrated all star on the downside of his career will be a travesty.
The organization should be unloading Pierce not bringing in another overrated former all star.
Brick, I know I’ve disageed with a lot of what you’ve said the last few days, but please save me a seat at the Air Canada Center.
Pierre71, we’re not “fair weather” fans. We’re fans who are baffled and repulsed by one moronic onwership and management decision after another and can’t bear to see the way a great franchise has been reduced to putrid waste. Using a term like “fair weather” fans is like saying anyone who disagrees with the president is unpatriotic. If you want to stand by and mindlessly cheer while this goes on, be my guest. You can have it. This team is perfect for people like you.
Here we go again: when your a Boston fan with old players you become a medical expert; ankles, knees, back, feet; the injuries will happen and the Globe wil report the findings and causes.
I just can’t beleive that in the best big man draft in dcades they traded out of it for a 30 something guy. I had supported Danny and Rivers moves all along, up till now when they choked on their pick.
I was out of this blog because it was too negative; I’m man enough now to say you are all correct; this Celitc administration is not championship driven; it has become “cover my behind” driven. they just achieved 1st to 2nd round knock out for the next 2 yers; congradulations.
by 4thgenfan on Jun 28, 2007 7:43 PM EDT reply actions
Fair weather fan fits perfectly. You just keep jumping from frontrunner to frontrunner, I’ll stick with my C’s. I may not agree with everything but that does NOT make me less of a fan. And BTW if you disagree with the president on the war then you are for surrender and thus unpatriotic ;D
by Pierre71 on Jun 28, 2007 7:58 PM EDT reply actions
Why is this such a bad trade? People are killing it. You get a 26 ppg scorer to complement Paul Pierce. Yes he will be 32 in a month. Why is age so important? Michael Jordan won his first title at 30. Pierce will be 30 and Allen is 32- both of these guys are super hungry to win. I think this is a terrific move for Boston and anyone bashing this should be ashamed of themselves.
You got rid of Sczerbiak’s contract, still have Theo’s to peddle and kept Al Jefferson.
I think this is great and Allen will compliment Pierce very nicely.
You guys do realize Ray Allen had a 54 point game last season and the highest scoring average of his career? Looking at half the comments here, he’s ready for the retirement home. We have Allen for the next 3 years, ages 32, 33, and 34. His contract turns into a huge asset in year 3, so if he degrades rapidly, it’s not like we are stuck with him forever.
We didn’t get killed on the money either. The money we’d be paying Delonte and Wally over the next two seasons is about 2 million less per year than Ray Allen’s salary. In year 3, we get killed, but the contract is an asset then!
Pierce now has his chance with a vet. I am wondering about salaries. Everyone is groaning about Ray Allens contract. How much is it? Its 3 yrs right. How much is wallys and delontes subtract?
by Big Baby Jesus on Jun 28, 2007 11:59 PM EDT reply actions
I can’t believe people are so critical of this trade. The Celts didn’t give up any of their best players, and got possibly the best shooter in the game. Plus, Ray Allen’s a Reggie Miller type of player — he should be effective until his late 30s. He definitely has more than 3 years left.
I’m so sick of certain people on this site constantly claiming that they’re going to start following the Raptors, then continuing to hang around making inane comments.
by Knox Harrington on Jun 29, 2007 1:35 AM EDT reply actions
































