The Rookies
We picked up two players in the second round who were each projected by many to be first round talents. Here are their Rookiepedia bios.
Comparisons
Devin Harris, Monta EllisPositives
Good size and quickness for the point guard position. A very good defender with quick hands and feet. Very athletic player who knows how to use his athleticism to beat his defender. Excellent at getting to the rim. Very good outside shooter with NBA 3 point range.Negatives
He is not a great distributor. He is more of an undersized two guard than a true point guard. Can be turnover prone. Has not shown a natural ability to control the pace of the game. Can be a streaky shooter.
(note: here is a funny story on Pruitt by Deadspin)
Davis’ has upside because of his smooth play and size and strength, but will need to slim down to compete in the pros. Due to his height his is tied to playing Power Forward in the NBA.
Known for his excellent post play, is able to score with his back to the basket or by facing up and moving past his defender. Tough to move on the block, on offense and defense. Known for his excellent rebounding skills.
After shedding weight last offseason, Davis still weighs too much for the NBA, which is cause for concern. Conditioning is a question and he struggles to get up and down the floor quickly. Best suited for a slow tempo team.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice overview of our second round choices. As in all cases both players have some concerns as well as great potential upside.
With Pruit, we’ll need to find out if he’s another Delonte West….half SG and half PG but not a starter at either position. He’ll need to show more PG skills than he showed in college. He could be a “poor man’s clone” of Ray Allen at SG. Thus we may still need another “true” PG as Rondo’s backup or as Rondo’s tutor.
The major concern with Davis is WEIGHT CONTROL. For his size he has an amazing skill set and great mobility. It would be interesting to see just how effective he could be if he kept his weight around 260lbs.
by moskqq on Jun 29, 2007 7:17 AM EDT reply actions
I’m really surprised we passed on McRoberts. I didn’t like him in the lottery, but when you get to the thirties, don’t you have to take a flier? His downside is no lower than Davis’ and his upside is way higher.
by jarobiso on Jun 29, 2007 7:39 AM EDT reply actions
It will be interesting to see whether McRoberts has a higher UPSIDE than Glen Davis. If Glen can keep his weight down, he has STAR “potential”. As for McRoberts, I expect his best upside will be as an NBA starter and complementary player (not star potential)..
by moskqq on Jun 29, 2007 7:49 AM EDT reply actions
A big arse can do wonders down low. Remember Barkley?
by Wilt on Jun 29, 2007 7:57 AM EDT reply actions
In a typical draft, both of these guys are first round talents. Solid picks by the Celtics.
by gjohnson88 on Jun 29, 2007 8:10 AM EDT reply actions
On the subject of big arses, what about Mark Aguirre? I wonder if that was the basis for the Celtics’ selection.
by Celtsfansince55 on Jun 29, 2007 8:17 AM EDT reply actions
The Celtics suck. Who cares what these guys become, we’re not going to be legit for another 20 years. >:(
I’m so disappointed.
by Real World on Jun 29, 2007 9:09 AM EDT reply actions
I’m a Big Davis fan…he’s the ideal pick – especially at #35 – to shore up the post rotation. He’s big and strong enough to contribute right away. And, as an added bonus, he’s yet another very likeable personality, which seems increasingly to be a major factor for the Cs. I don’t know how many games we’ll win, but with Ray Allen, Perk, Big Al, Gerald, Scal and now Davis – we’ll definitely have the most good-natured, likeable team in the NBA.
by Dorchester Jayhawk on Jun 29, 2007 9:21 AM EDT reply actions
all the stuff people are saying about glen davis is probably just old infrmation… look at this guy.. look at this picture. does he look like oliver miller?
http://www.draftexpress.com/viewprofile.php?p=420
sounds like a decent prospect to me for a 2nd rounder..
If Perk could get Davis to go on his training regimen, he could literally be an all-star, he is that talented. Now, this is exceedingly unlikely, but – he still will be a solid rotation player. And to get a front-court rotation player in the second round, that’s always a good pick.
by Cullain on Jun 29, 2007 9:59 AM EDT reply actions
“I’m really surprised we passed on McRoberts.”
Or Fazekas, Or Gasol.
by TenaciousD on Jun 29, 2007 11:48 AM EDT reply actions
Brickowski said:
Who cares?
Celtics fans? :P
by Ct_Celtics7 on Jun 29, 2007 2:38 PM EDT reply actions
Davis will fit in perfectly with a slow down team, which is what the Celtics are becoming. Of the projected starting five, only Rondo could be seen as a true run-the-court player. Pierce has never wanted to run and there’s no reason to think he’ll start anytime soon. Allen is another half court guy. Perkins is lucky if he makes it past half court before the ball is shot and the C’s go on defense. Jefferson is a post player.
What Ainge probably meant was the second unit would run with Tony Allen, Green, Telfair, Gomes and Powe. They’ll have to. Otherwise they’ll get pounded in a half-court game.
by lemonadesky on Jun 29, 2007 6:52 PM EDT reply actions
Last time I checked most of the time spent on offense is spent in the halfcourt situation. So it might be a good idea to have some guys who can execute that. Just because Allen, Pierce, and Al are good in a halfcourt set doesn’t mean that they can’t get out and fastbreak when the opportunity arises.
This team needs to learn defense if they want to run, however.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for this team to play defense.
by lemonadesky on Jun 29, 2007 11:07 PM EDT reply actions
check out some of these bricks from big baby
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqVB0OMb65M&mode=related&search=
:(
































