Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

We're Not Done... or Are We?

We're not done. 

That's the mantra the Celtics brass keeps putting out there.  Yet, as each day unfolds, more and more available free agents put their name on the dotted line for another team.  I'm not sure if Danny even had his hat in the ring for any of the bigger fish, unless one considers Joe Smith a Sockeye sal-mon.  Ohh, but remember folks, We're Not Done.  They said so.

But uh, what if we are done? [gulp]

I peeked at Sports Illustrated's list of the ten best remaining free agents and wondered if the Celtics stood a chance at snagging any of them and if each would fill a need.  For those that haven't read the piece, here they are, as ordered by SI:

1.  Anderson Varejao    6'10    PF    Restricted

He's big.  He's Brazilian.  He looks like Sideshow Bob.   He plays solid defense and doesn't need the ball to impact a game.  He's perfect for the Celtics, but comes at too high a price, I'm sure.   Cleveland also holds all the power in trying to sign him.  I don't think Varejao is truly valuable enough to make a run at in a sign and trade, either.  He's offensively limited and might ultimately end up a hairier and more talented version of Scalabrine.  That said, he's still probably one of the better fits of the available players.

2.  Mickeal Pietrus    6'6    SG/SF    Restricted

INTERIOR:  GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE

[AINGE dials a rotary telephone] 

AINGE: Hey Don, it's Danny again.  Hey, we've got this great player, you might have heard his name -- Gerald Green?  Yes, the Slam Dunk Champion Gerald Green!  The very same!  Did you know he can also shoot the three?  Wow, I think he'd be really great in you guys' up and down system.  I bet you can really use another wonderfully athletic player that loves to get up and down the floor and throw down nasty jams --  while also being a capable trailer for the spot up bomb.  You'll absolutely love him, I promise!  [pause]  What do I want? Well, you know I just thought we might do size for size, and you've got that Pietrus kid still to sign, I was thinking we could do an offense for defense kind of thing and maybe throw in a... [click]  Hello?  Hello?  Donnie?  Don?  Oh, dadgummitshuckswillickersgollymcgee!

[AINGE flips through a tattered Rolodex, landing on the tab marked 'Mc'] 

3.  Chris Webber   6'10   PF   Unrestricted

There was a time when I would have drunk a full glass of hemlock before contemplating Chris Webber in Celtic green.  Now, I'm not so sure.  I thought he was Done (with a capital D) before signing with Detroit.  I don't know whether it was because he was energized by playing with a contender, but ole C-Webb put up some impressive numbers before the tank read 'E' in April.  Detroit played Webber waaaay too many minutes, too; he'd be fine for about 20 minutes a night at age 34.  Think before turning up your nose in disgust, please.  He fills the Celtics' need for big man depth.  He's an excellent passer and would be the perfect high post cog in the offense.  He's a veteran and has played in many big games (no timeout jokes).  I don't see anything wrong with throwing a 2 year deal his way.  It's a risk that he might not stay committed to a non contending team, and he's of course a horrible defender -- but that lot has already been cast.  We're going to win games this season by outscoring people with the Three Headed Monster, contrary to what Doc says. I'd really make a run at him.  Outbid Mark Cuban.  Yeah, I can't believe I'm saying it, either.

4.  Andray Blatche  6'10   PF   Restricted

I don't get the fascination with this kid.  He hasn't done a thing in this league and yet he's the fourth best free agent remaining?  Sure, sure, extrapolate his stats out over 48 minutes and you get blah blah blah...  Doing the same thing to Perkins makes him look like Moses Malone, too. 

5.  Matt Barnes   6'7   SF   Unrestricted

I get the sneaking suspicion that the Celts are after this guy.  He's that athletic "power 3" that seems to fascinate ole Danny boy to no end; the knee-jerk signing of Brandon Wallace certainly proved that infatuation.  Barnes isn't likely to leave the friendly confines of Nellieball, and any team that gets him out of Golden State is likely to have overpaid for the privilege.  Barnes is a decent player, but one with a very fixed value.  I'm utterly terrified we're going to throw a 4 year 35 million dollar deal his way.  Let's hope that he's tired of bouncing around (five teams in five seasons) and agrees to a hometown discount.

6.  Ruben Patterson   6'5   SG   Unrestricted

Great stats last season.  A rugged defender.  Certifiably insane and a divisive presence in the locker room.  Also the same size as just about every other player on the Celtics.  Just the type of guy Doc wants around all his impressionable youngsters!  Whatever he's asking for, let's triple it.  [vomit]

7.  Charlie Bell   6'3    PG    Restricted

I would be working overtime to land this guy, but I doubt he wants a role as a backup PG after starting 64 games last year.  No, he's not a true veteran point guard, but Bell would be a good fit for the team and slide in nicely to the "shooting point" role once filled by Delonte West.  I think that role is more valuable to the Celtics this year than it ever has been, due to the amount of potential double-teaming the big three will face.  What's the right price for Charlie?  3 years, 13 million, and a case of Wonka bars ought to do it.

8.   Sasha Pavlovic   6'7   SF/SG   Restricted

Cleveland should throw a bunch of money at Pavlovic and Varejao so that they'll be doomed to mediocrity for the next 4 years.  Wouldn't that be a fantastic result after their fluke trip to the Finals?  I just don't understand Pavlovic's value, especially in light of his playoff ineptitude.  He's a one dimensional player and would be totally redundant on the Celtics.  I'll even go one step further:  I wouldn't even trade Gerald Green for him straight up.  That should tell you a lot, because after Gerald's summer league stinkbomb, I'm ready to deal him for an alarm clock and a lube job at Meineke. 

9.   Ime Udoka   6'5   SG   Unrestricted

I have to confess that I don't know much about Udoka, nor can I recall seeing him play.  He seems to have some consideration around the league as a solid wing defender, but the Celtics already have Tony Allen for that purpose.  Please get healthy, Tony.  Whether you know it or not, the season might depend on it.

Wait, what's that sound?  Is that a rotary phone?

10.  Earl Boykins    5'nothing    PG    Unrestricted

I'll say this about the little bugger -- he does put up points in a hurry.  But is that what the Celtics need?  He's not really a shooter and he's likely to command a fairly hefty price.  Some team (probably the Knicks, a hunch) will give him a fat contract and carte blanche to hoist up a lot of shots.  There's just not enough basketball left to satisfy this little guy's mean appetite for attempts here in Boston.

Brevin Knight's name is still being bandied about, as is Juan Carlos Navarro's.  I don't know much outside of Weiss' article on Navarro.  Brevin Knight is a known quantity but most feel his reputation will prevent him ever from landing here.  History has shown that if anything, Ainge has always erred on the side of good character. 

In my earlier massive breakdown of the team, I didn't feel that the Celtics were doing to do anything beyond the Allen deal despite their proclamations.  So far, I've been right.  I didn't want to be, but there it is.  Reviewing the list from S.I. made me question whether or not the Celtics had the a) interest or b) ability to sign/sign and trade for any of the leftover scraps.  Sadly, my answer is still a resounding no.  The restricted free agents all require sign and trade, and outside of Chris Webber, there isn't anyone particularly attractive on the unrestricted list.  I think that Webber being the only available guy speaks to the sadness of the situation.  

What about a regular trade?  During the summer, they are rare birds.  Usually teams stand pat going in to training camp and then play out the first half of the season before getting their trade juices flowing again in February.  So uhhh... uhhh...

Yep.

I think we're done.

Cry

Comment 42 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Webber would be able to get you some buckets from the high post, but he’s not a finisher. I’d like to see some “killer instict” guys on this team. None of the characters above suit our needs.

by fizzyice on Jul 27, 2007 4:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Webber was traded to Detroit. If I remember right, Philly bought him out and he then signed as a FA.

I don’t think he’s interested in traveling very far from home. He’s staying in Detroit if he plays.

by cavman on Jul 27, 2007 4:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Right you are cavman – my bad on that one.

by dobbs on Jul 27, 2007 4:38 PM EDT reply actions  

While there may not be fitting free agent left on the market that does not mean the C’s are done. Obviusly a trade can still be made to improve the team. No one saw the Ray Allen trade comming until it was agreed upon before the draft. A trade could easily come out of no where again.

by furball2323 on Jul 27, 2007 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

There’s no point trying to make a trade when all the other teams are on vacation. Wait until training camp.

by greendoc on Jul 27, 2007 4:56 PM EDT reply actions  

After reading that list, i HOPE we’re done.

Actually, I have to admit, I think Webber would work well with PP, RA and AJ. He is a great passer, could play high post. They would be the worst defensive team ever, but a powerful offense.

by Cousin It on Jul 27, 2007 5:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Welcome back to purgatory …. in the play offs and bounced in the first round … only to get the 15-20th pick in the first round … let’s just hope management can pull another gem # 15 (al jeffersonish type pick)… c ya in 5 years with more hope … i hope

by West Side on Jul 27, 2007 5:07 PM EDT reply actions  

We need someone who can rebound and play defense – both team and individual.

by scndtony on Jul 27, 2007 5:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Charlie Bell would be a decent backup for Rondo. I haven’t seen a whole lot of him but from the limited times I have watched him he seemed solid, with a nice stroke from the outside, with poise and an average handle. I would personally want a bit more experience out of my backup PG however. The only other player that I would be really interested in is Varejao but the price would likely be too steep. He would be a near perfect fit with Al Jefferson though.

If the C’s don’t think that TA is going to be get back near 100% and are not confident in Gerald/Gomes as backups on the wing (and your looking to deal Gomes/Green)guys like Barnes and Patterson start to make some sense but only on short money type deals.

by alchemist on Jul 27, 2007 5:29 PM EDT reply actions  

we may be done with free agents, but there are still a handful of trades that could happen. Unless it’s a trade to bring a big name guy that can help us go to the Finals, I say wait it out until the season starts and see what exactly you have in your current roster. Specifically, Tony Allen, Ryan Gomes, and Gerald Green. Let’s see if any of these three are going to step up like Big Al did last year.

by Vegas Green on Jul 27, 2007 5:32 PM EDT reply actions  

There are still a couple of players out there that can help us, Brian Skinner comes to mind.

Most of what is left is obviously ‘second tier’ talent, but that is what we were going to end up with. Gugliotta, Scalabrine, etc.

To repeat a comment, most teams will wait until they see what they have in camp before making any trades. Some will release or waive people like we just did with A. Ray. The next will be Dee from Utah? 8)

by billysan on Jul 27, 2007 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Or, we could trade some of the bunch of pieces we have for someone, which always seemed like the plan anyway. I don’t know who thought we’d be big free agent players with our MLE and a 24 win team.

by PrimusSucks on Jul 27, 2007 6:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Achemist, I agree about Varejoa being a good compliment to AJ. That’s why I thought Noah might have been a good pick, if we kept it.

by Cousin It on Jul 27, 2007 6:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I guess Antoine Carr, Rick Mahorn, or Dennis Rodman aren’t coming through that door. These types of players are what we need. At this point, if there isn’t a trade involved, I’m voting for staying intact until we see how the season progresses.

by amenhotep04 on Jul 27, 2007 6:17 PM EDT reply actions  

The Cavs will match anything we can offer .. Ferry has been told to go into luxury tax zone if he wants (within reason)
Webber wants to win a ring , for a team with the second worst record last year , regardless of potential you can safely rule us out..
Udoka is a very good role player and the blazers and the spurs who will start looking for a heir apparent to Bowen have already got him marked. Also he does not fit a need.
Charlie Bell would take a job thats seems to have already been earmarked to Telfair so whats the point?

by havlicekstoletheball on Jul 27, 2007 6:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice article that pretty much tells it like it is. It also confirms suspicions that the Celtic’s don’t have the ability to secure good talent because our pantry isn’t filled with great players.

by moskqq on Jul 27, 2007 6:48 PM EDT reply actions  

No trade plus no free agent equals a long year. We’re .500 at best with this crew, and I mean super-healthy (can’t anyone to go down, and someone usually does). So, what, eighth seed in the woeful East, one-and-done in the playoffs.
Sweet!

by Big_Easy on Jul 27, 2007 7:15 PM EDT reply actions  

We aren’t going from the second worst team in the league to the championship even with our group healthy. Danny’s best opportunity for picking up a “free” player is going with an international. Frankly I’m shocked that we’ve not seem the least bit interested in drafting foreign talent but there were a couple of undrafted International players that were highly touted a few years ago that could be worth a camp invite. The best bet is through a trade and play out the season with who we have and see if any of them are consistent (AJ, Gomes) back from injury (Tony Allen, Ratliff) or worth the gamble (GG, Telfair, Wallace, Pruitt, Big baby.

Unrestricted FAs are the only ones worth pursuing anyways and there will be a ton of folks available next summer that could alter the balance.

The sell high buy low routine – I don’t see anyone out there unless you want Washington’s bigs and they’re not worth it unless they take Scals back.

by desertgreen on Jul 27, 2007 8:35 PM EDT reply actions  

It seems to leaves the question, who’s overseas that could help us?

by no kidding on Jul 27, 2007 9:04 PM EDT reply actions  

is Roy Tarpley still playing..

by havlicekstoletheball on Jul 27, 2007 9:51 PM EDT reply actions  

We’re done? It’s only July 27th, plenty of time left for trades or signings. These are just the remaining FA’s left after lewis really. wasn’t known as FA summer.

by truthhurts34 on Jul 27, 2007 11:16 PM EDT reply actions  

dobbs – the name I Me U … doh! (ka) MAY SAY IT ALL …. yep we’re done like an over-cooked Oscar Meyer Weiner. :o

by Master Po on Jul 28, 2007 12:14 AM EDT reply actions  

I think it’s okay if we are done for only the next 2-3 months or so. I think Danny shouldn’t have made it sound so much like the other shoe was going to drop over the next few weeks after the draft.

I think it may be wise to take a step back. See what you got, see how other players, FA or not, are doing leading up to the season. See who has shown vast improvement, been working on certain parts of their game, getting in better shape, etc. then maybe even go into the season before making a trade.

The Eastern Conference won’t be won in the first month or two of the season, so Danny shouldn’t rush a trade or signing just to please the fans.

by Vegas Green on Jul 28, 2007 1:37 AM EDT reply actions  

The Celtics are probably done until the trade deadline … when they will be shopping Pierce and/or Ray Allen for expiring contracts and young players/picks. At best, this squad looks like an eighth seed to me and that’s only if Rondo somehow morphs into s steady point guard. Ainge should have kept Delonte and plugged Corey Brewer into the 2-guard position. What should he have done with Wally? Either sit him on the end of the bench with Veal or use Ratliff’s deal to help ship him out of town.

by lemonadesky on Jul 28, 2007 7:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Top-notch GM’s target key players for team acquisition and then go get them. It’s understood that you have to “give” something good in order to “get” something good in return. The important component here is the real TEAM value of the player you are trying to get.

The ability to acquire a “difference-maker” and thereby substantially improve your team often means that you must OVERPAY to get them. So what? Key player acquisitions are worth the extra cost. The test question remains…is this player important to team success?

When Red traded “Easy Ed” to get the draft rights to Bill Russell the trade LOOKED lopsided in favor of SanFrancisco. When Red traded the #1 pick in the draft for “fumble-fingers” Robert Parish and Kevin McHale (an awkward-looking center projected to play at PF) the universal question was WHY Robert Parish?…who seemed a disaster in the paint because he couldn’t hold onto passes thrown to him.

Admittedly Red was lucky with both players as they were on the verge of “breaking-out”. The important ingredient is the GM who recognizes talent potential at key team positions and then goes out and gets those players.

By contrast, regardless of monetary constraints, Ainge only targets those players that he can seemingly afford instead of the “bold” approach where one targets KEY players and then finds ways to acquire that player.

by moskqq on Jul 28, 2007 7:44 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the C’s are done for at least a few months. If Danny is going to beef up the team with better talent, his bargaining position now is to offer quantity for quality.

A combination of GG, Gomes, Powe, Telfair, Veal, Davis, Pruitt would help a team looking for depth that can afford to give up a starter.

I wouldn’t offer the new ‘big 3’ to anyone and would hold onto Rondo, TA and Perk unless a lopsided offer was made for them. Granted TA and Perk need to show they’re healthy still but those 3 make a very solid/good top 6.

by slamtheking on Jul 28, 2007 8:06 AM EDT reply actions  

I wonder how many basket ball playes are on the clear.
amare stoudemire always comes to my mind . the roids that make you faster with more endurance and agressivenes, like the world class sprinters and bikers take, not the roids that kevin willis took to “pump you upp” i think thats the way to go unless your in wrestling would be the exception. if gg was on roids , he would be more aggressive underneath faster stronger more endurance and he would be a shawn marion clone gg needs that aggessiveness or mean streak to be the player the team wants. i hope he gets it and without the clear. then we would have that big 3 we desire

by perk on Jul 28, 2007 10:02 AM EDT reply actions  

If I had MY pick, I’d go with Charlie Bell.
Day dream believer and a
home coming queen.

by mcpu40 on Jul 28, 2007 10:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, steroids are definitely the solution for GG. :D

by dobbs on Jul 28, 2007 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

So G.Green had a bad Las Vegas! No argument there. Giving up his potential for proven mediocrity as you are suggesting is stupid. He can fly, he can shoot and he may be able to learn the rest. I doubt that he received much education even in high school. He’s 21. Give him time!

I think Danny had a good offseason. None of the big superstars have shown they can win without help adn getting them would have shipped out too much help. Ray Allen is super. Good shooter, great guy. Sorry to lose D.West but he was one of those “chips” who did not have “cornerstone” potential and we would have taken Ji and we didn’t need another soft,young shooter. We’ve still got the Ratliff card to either play (literally), play (in trade) or hold to pay Big Al next year. Nice “no move” Danny! And Big Baby and Wallace (and maybe Pruitt) look like good NBA potential for toughness and D on the wing. Nice work Danny!

Ratliff may solve the need for help at the 5 and the biggest exposure is back up at PG. I don’t see Doc ever bringing out the best in Telfair, and Pruitt didn’t show much in LV. I do think that Barea was “the one that got away” per his LV games.

by Wildblu1 on Jul 28, 2007 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

There are no free agent point guards or centers worth thinking about. Remember also that a free agent means cutting another player, since the Celtics’ roster is maxed out at 15 if they sign Davis and Pruitt. So there would probably have to be sign-and-trade, unless the C’s are willing to waive goodbye to Pruitt, which I seriously doubt.

Varejao is a nice hustle player, but he’s way too expensive.

Pietrus is a good defender but probably too expensive. Matt Barnes is a punk and in any event he would not thrive in Rivers’ plodding, slowdown, ISO-heavy offense. Patterson is a registered sex offender, so he wouldn’t be Wyc Grousbeck’s cup of tea.

Ime Udoka is a good defender and might be worth pursuing, and so would Boykins, who would be fun to watch.

by Brickowski on Jul 28, 2007 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Well, SOMETHING needs to happen. Right now we don’t look like a playoff team – even with the addition of Allen. I would put the Pistons, Cavs, Raptors, Bulls, Heat, Nets, Magic and Wizards ahead of us.

by DJ to Bird on Jul 28, 2007 11:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Ok everyone, please remind me again why a Ratliff/Green for Camby trade doesn’work? I know Camby is a little old and has a huge salary. However, he’s still one of the best defensive centers in the league. Is it because Denver does not want to give him up? They have Nene, and his numbers were not too bad last year. Is it because they would have no depth at the Center position if they gave up Camby? Is it because Green stinks and they have no use for him (they already have J.R. Smith)? Unless I am mistaken, they are still way over the cap – so don’t they need to unload a few guys? Would we need to take Reggie Evans as part of the deal? Would we need to include Powe or Gomes to make it work? Would they have a need for Telfair? I’d just like some answers on this.

by DJ to Bird on Jul 28, 2007 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

DJ, the answer is simple. Danny has only one target right now. He will wait another month if it means McHale will be willing to move/can convince KG to move to Boston. Once that is officially dead in Ainge’s mind then we can move on to something else.

by celty86 on Jul 28, 2007 12:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Ratliff/Green for Camby doesn’t work because:

1. Denver would have to include more salary to make it work: either Najera or Evans. Camby only makes 8 million a year.

2. They drink kool aid in the mile high city, too, and they won’t be ready to trade Camby until it becomes clear that the Nuggets are going nowhere. Probably what will happen is that George Karl will be fired. After that, they will start trying to break up the luxury tax monster they have created.

by Brickowski on Jul 28, 2007 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I just don’t think any pure trades are gonna get done until February. Maybe the Garnett domino falls and maybe it doesn’t. Same holds true with Kobe. This has traditionally been a quiet period for trades and right now hope springs eternal with every GM as he gazes at his roster. Camby is a fit. I don’t think he has a chance of becoming a Celtic until Feburary at the least.

by dobbs on Jul 28, 2007 4:19 PM EDT reply actions  

i say we sign brevin and pj brown. wait and see if theo can do anything this coming season.

by pp34isthe1 on Jul 28, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Anyone have any thoughts on why we haven’t signed Pruit and Davis yet?

by TrueGreen on Jul 28, 2007 7:03 PM EDT reply actions  

They haven’t signed Pruitt and Davis because they are still waiting for Kevin Garnett to grovel at Danny Ainge’s feet and beg to come to Boston.

by Brickowski on Jul 28, 2007 7:38 PM EDT reply actions  

not much out there free agent-wise. and danny’s track record with trades-not so hot.not much to look forward to.

by nazzbo on Jul 28, 2007 7:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks guys for the Camby comments. Makes sense.

by DJ to Bird on Jul 29, 2007 8:30 AM EDT reply actions  

good job dobbs – a well-written guest column for once.

by game sink on Jul 29, 2007 11:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Importance of the 6th Seed
Imagesca5vwn2y_small
Don't Worry
J0382610_small
Danny Ainge will have to trade Bass et al in exchange of . . .
Small
Why it makes no sense to blow this team up
Small
New CBA, contracts, and opt-outs
I_want_to_believe_small
The Reality of Rondo
401462_10150508373640614_580570613_9007645_2082321498_n_small
Time For The Celtics To Rebuild
Small
TRADE IDEA...
Small
Is it possible...
Small
Monta and/or Smith?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi