Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Instant Bench

posey2.jpgAnd just like that, we have a bench. 

When our bench was just House, Pollard, Scalabrine, and a bunch of young or hurt guys, there was plenty of reason to worry.  There was a big hole.  Tony Allen was the 6th man and he remains a big question mark.  If he plays with explosiveness and confidence, great.  If not, then there was going to be a lot on the shoulders of Brian Scalabrine.

Insert James Posey and everything seems, …well, a little more rosy.

Posey is the sixth man on this team.  He can provide both Pierce and Allen plenty of rest.  He can play hard-nosed, lock down defense on the opponent’s best players, meaning even more rest for Pierce and Allen.  And he won’t back down from anyone and is perfectly willing to mix it up (as you can see from these youtube clips).  He also brings Championship experience to the squad.  Basically he’s the perfect fit for what this team was lacking (aside from a backup point guard).

Somehow this actually makes me feel a little better about the point guard position too.  Yes, I’m still hoping that the team finds a guy that gets cut from their current team and is willing to play for the vet minimum here.  However, adding Posey solidifies the wing position which has a kind of trickle-down effect on the other ones.

House is really more of a shooting guard than a point guard, but he can play the position as a shooting point guard.  Our starter really is a pure point guard and an above average defender to boot.  Having a gunner for a backup isn’t the worst thing in the world, especially when Posey (defense) is subbing in for Allen or Pierce (offense). 

This also keeps Scalabrine from needing to play small forward, which makes him more valuable as a 4, which leaves Scot Pollard to back up the 5.

On the other hand, as a group this bench is very flexible.  House can play the 1 or 2.  Posey can play the 2 or 3.  Scalabrine can play the 3 or 4.  Pollard can play the 4 or 5.  Once Tony Allen gets back to full speed, that’s 5 legit bench players with NBA experience and versatility.  We’re looking at a team that is 9 or 10 deep now.

Of course sometimes bad things happen.  There’s always the threat of injury.  Or some of these guys might not pan out the way we would hope.  With the possible exception of Posey, I have reservations about all of them.  House seems one dimensional.  Pollard is a year removed from getting any playing time at all.  Scalabrine should be better this year, but he's still Scal. 

However, we still do have some youth to fill in the gaps where needed.  Pruitt is a nice 3rd point guard to have around.  Powe and Davis could both challenge for time in the big man rotation.  Even Wallace or Manuel (for now) are available in case of injury.

I also admire the way that Ainge is maintaining salary flexibility.  They could have used the whole MLE to sign someone to a 5 year deal.  But they wouldn’t have enough money to sign other players and they would have been further in luxury tax land year after year.  In other words, he could have made the same mistake McHale made getting a guy like Mike James.  Instead, he’s added low cost, no-strings guys that might just surprise people.  Especially if they gel as a unit.  If they work out, great.  We can always resign them.  If not, we’ll try someone else next year.

This team will go as far as the starters will take them.  But the underlying fear since The Trade was that somehow the bench would be their undoing.  In one move, Danny made everyone feel a whole lot better about that situation.  Ainge has to be the early favorite for GM of the year.  He’s done a masterful job.  Now the team just has to go out there and win.

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

good point JEFF….

I’ll put my vote for DANNY AINGE as GM of the year !!! woohoo!!!!! ;D

by celtpinoy on Aug 27, 2007 5:11 AM EDT reply actions  

if we couldn’t get durant or oden, i wanted brewer. well we now have a superior brewer in posey. it’s up to doc to make the pieces fit.

by nazzbo on Aug 27, 2007 6:34 AM EDT reply actions  

How good is KG???? a 32 yr old shooting guard with 2 ankle surgeries looks good..House,Pollard&Posey look good..and Danny is not near done,he’s got till the rosters are due next april…and in the next 2 summers he’ll have the full MLE&Ray’s ending deal…we’re players for years to come

by Motown on Aug 27, 2007 7:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Danny has made the C’s relevant again in just one short off season. We can win the whole thing. Ainge has been rock solid in his handling of the C’s.

Go Celtics

by The Bones on Aug 27, 2007 7:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Posey really does answer many of our needs. Lock down wing defender, who can handle a number of positions and also put a few points on the board. And as much as love Rondo, it would still be nice to pick up a veteran backup point. As Motown said, this is just the beginning of the Celtics being back in the game. More fun to come.

by NJCeltsFan on Aug 27, 2007 7:12 AM EDT reply actions  

DOES ANYONE know a good place to get a great deal on a 32-inch HDTV?

It’s time.

by mcpu40 on Aug 27, 2007 7:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Getting Posey was huge. I still am hoping a vet PG gets cut and we pick him up, which to me is the final missing piece. If not, I guess we’ll have to wait until next off-season to sign Cassell.

by Roy_Hobbs on Aug 27, 2007 8:36 AM EDT reply actions  

I like the signings so far, but to get us over the hump (to contending with the Western big boys, we’re totally in contention in the Leastern Conf.—tho’ I an concerned with Detroit) we need a sixth man in the true Cs tradition: McHale, Hondo, Walton. Posey is a 7th man IMHO, House 8th, Pollard (who I subjectively really like, if healthy) 9th man.

That 6th man is going to have to be a vet-min ring-chasing guy. Unless TA comes back 100% and plays like he did in the month before his latest injury.

So I guess I respectfully disagree that Posey is the 6th man answer, and that we’re tooled to win it all. We’re tooled to compete and maybe win the East. But hey, I’ll take that for now! This is going to be one heck of a season!

by Eeyore III on Aug 27, 2007 8:45 AM EDT reply actions  

I love this signing. I’m not sure If Posey is actaully a great option at SG, but both Ray and Pierce can play the off-guard next to him, House can take a few minutes there, and after the break, TA will be the designated SG defender (unless he’s traded for an extra big, or the vet PG we could still use).

But the versatility Posey does bring is the ability to play small, with Posey, Pierce, Ray, and a PG spreading the floor for KG at center. I really like that lineup as an occasional change of pace.

Posey’s size at SF also make sit easier to play KG and Scalabrini at the 4/5, especially if Pierce is at SG to help with the rebounding. I like Scals as a 5th-option role player. He’s a good defender at PF and a 40% 3-point shooter. Surround Pierce and KG with House, Posey and Scals when Ray is on the bench, and the role players will DESTROY teams from outside if they try to double the All-stars. All three should shoot 40% from 3 this year…

by LA_33 on Aug 27, 2007 8:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Get Gary Payton for minimum if he does not retire!!!!

Who was the last player to play on the Celtics who had a championship ring prior to Posey??

Trvia of the Day

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Gary Payton HAS a ring now, but he did NOT have one at the time he was with the C’s…

Antoine has a ring now too (unless it was stolen!).

by mcpu40 on Aug 27, 2007 9:08 AM EDT reply actions  

But I mean before Posey – who was the last player to play with the Celtics WHILE HAVING a ring no matter where he won it?

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 9:52 AM EDT reply actions  

Everything is beautiful!

by docextension on Aug 27, 2007 9:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Wow, great trivia PO, I’m stumped. I just went back and looked at the rosters back to 93 and nobody jumps out to me. So I’m going to guess Robert Parish.

by Jeff Clark on Aug 27, 2007 10:01 AM EDT reply actions  

And in terms of the versatility Jeff mentioned, Posey could probably guard some point guards and some big men too. He did a phenomenal job guarding Dirk Nowitzki the year the Heat won the title. He could also do a great job against the likes of Shawn Marion. I wouldn’t be shocked at all to see Doc trot out a lineup of Rondo, Allen, Pierce, Posey, and Garnett at times next year.

by Jon on Aug 27, 2007 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Is it Randy Brown? Does he count?

by Truck Lewis on Aug 27, 2007 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

By adding JPosey, I think we can now be considered a legit title contender

by cocofan on Aug 27, 2007 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Well unless I am mistaken – the answer is in fact Robert Parish (Chieeeef!) who laster played in 93/94

Jeff wins – one gold star, two free tickets to Wolves game in January when it’s -24 degrees, and an autographed bobble “hand” doll from Mark Retard Blunt.

Thanks for playing

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 10:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Randy Brown had 3 rings from the bulls 96-98 when he played for the celts from 2000-2002.

by Truck Lewis on Aug 27, 2007 10:44 AM EDT reply actions  

I knew that was going to happen – I like my answer better

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 10:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Can you say double-zero financing?

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

I would say that things are shaping up quite nicely for the Celts. Being a die-hard fan for 20 years, it is nice to finally see these guys relevant again. Posey is a nice addition to the fold (has some moxie) and with just one more minor veteran addition (PG) they should be on their way to Eastern Conference supremacy (or at the very least a ride to the conference finals).

by grovcom on Aug 27, 2007 10:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree about the Chief…. I think the Randy Brown era has been intentiontally erased from the memories of celts fans

by Truck Lewis on Aug 27, 2007 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

There was one more player with a ring after the Chief left Boston. That was the unfogettable (LOL) Zan Tabak. Zan played on the 1994-95 Houston Rockets champinship team and he also played for the Celtics during the 1997-98 season. Zan did not help us very much, the Celtics were 36-46 and did not make the play-offs.

by PACF on Aug 27, 2007 11:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Michael Vick has found Jesus! What a surprise! Who would have guessed that an athlete in trouble would decide to hand his life over to god?

All is forgiven, Michael …

by Cousin It on Aug 27, 2007 11:08 AM EDT reply actions  

What about the fact that if we wanna run small ball with an uptempo squad? Posey makes that possible with a lineup of Rondo/R.Allen/Pierce/Posey/Garnett? The Suns will have something to think about….

by truthhurts34 on Aug 27, 2007 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeff, agree with all your comments EXCEPT one. Gabe Pruit is not now nor perhaps ever will be “a nice 3rd PG guard option”! Ray Allen, although a pure SG, would be vastly superior to Pruit as a 3rd PG option IMHO.

I wonder if we’re all watching the SAME SL action? It’s obvious that some of us must have blinders on with our player assessments. While I admit that I do concentrate more on the PG position (having once played that position) I may be more critical and demanding in my expectations. However, until I see Pruit perform like a PG, I’m going to maintain my opinion that…he will be a BUST as an NBA PG… “Over and out”!

by moskqq on Aug 27, 2007 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

What’s wrong with Pruit? I saw his summer league play: he played within his game yet played with confidence. He brought the ball up, shot the 3 when he was open, and played smart ball. That’s all you really want from a back-up PG. He won’t need to breakdown the D this year. He (or Rondo or House) just need to get the ball to KG in the High Post Offense.

by Green Bear on Aug 27, 2007 11:42 AM EDT reply actions  

While I really, really like the signing, I really, really don’t see how this is instant bench. James Posey all by himself isn’t instant bench. All this talk about lock-down defense seems really exaggerated too. Whenever you hear talk about lock-down defense you hear Bruce Bowen, Ruben Patterson etc. I don’t remember the last time James Posey was mentioned as a lock-down defender until the second we got him. He’s a good defender yes, but the top tier? No way. Heck, I bet Tony Allen in his prime was better than him. The last time he made any defensive honors was back in college as the Atlantic Top 10 Defensive Player of the Year. Since then, as far as I know he hasn’t even been considered for All-NBA Defensive Teams. I think we’re going a little hard on the Kool-Aid.

You have to address your needs, namely PG and C. Our bench is still probably the weakest point in this team, though we have addressed our defense.

But I guess everything is unproven till the season starts.

I need to fast-forward to November.

by newyorkceltics on Aug 27, 2007 11:52 AM EDT reply actions  

The two major challenges for this team.

1. Doc Rivers-let’s face it, he’s a nice guy but mediocre coach.
2. Team leadership. This is PP’s team by dint of seniority with the club but PP has never shown great leadership skills. He played second fiddle to the Walker wiggle and I think was more comfortable in that role. Garnett is a born team leader. So, the struggle might be for PP to step aside and let Garnett lead the team. Could be interesting.

by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 12:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Re Green Bear; What’s wrong with Gabe Pruit? He has excellent size and athleticism which may have been enough in college. He lacks “court presence” (doesn’t do well anticipating player movement or passing lanes in a timely manner).

 He lacks great handles and doesn’t protect the ball well. As a result he needs to play off his defender which negates his use of “body shielding” to get the extra step for penetration. He needs picks to get open for his shots too.

Because he lacks great handles and doesn’t protect the ball well when the defender plays him close he turns his back to the Basket (hardly suitable for a PG to direct the action with his back to the basket).

Pruit seemed tentative about team spacing on the court and lacks the creativity to penetrate to disrupt interior defenses. While he possesses a smooth stroke with range, I failed to see him maneuver to free his shooting hand (couldn’t create his own shot).

I realize that SL performance can be deceiving on many levels but there are certain fundamental tasks that a prospective NBA PG should be able to perform against SL competition….something I failed to see Gabe do.

by moskqq on Aug 27, 2007 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

The Great Master PO said:
Get Gary Payton for minimum if he does not retire!!!!
———————————

Oh Great One, I’d rather sign you to the minimum if you’d be kind enough to take a pay cut. You can shoot, and you might bother to play defense more than one possession per game. Payton still thinks he’s a great player and there’s no way he takes a subordinate role to a one year man without being a disruption.

by iowa plowboy on Aug 27, 2007 12:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Gary Payton is well past his prime and his usefullness as a PG has passed. He may have a future as a coach but his playing days are now but distant and fond memories. I’d rather have Ray Allen as a back-up PG because he still has the legs, handles, passing ability and shooting range to make a difference.

We’re only in trouble at the PG position if Rondo fails to perform, gets in serious foul trouble or sustains a serious injury. The resulting magnitude of his absence will dictate an appropriate response by Ainge.

by moskqq on Aug 27, 2007 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Pierce has shown some immediate willingness to defer to KG, and KG is the type of guy who can’t help but take over. A good fit.

by clover on Aug 27, 2007 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

moskqq and plowboy – don’t sugar coat it about GP – tell me how you really feel ;) I say he can still play and mentor but then again I still eric Williams

The real Large James good point about PP and KG. I guess we will find out about The Truth about the Big Ticket and his ability to mesh. I think he will be fine.

Wish I knew more about Posey – never paid much attention to him

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 1:14 PM EDT reply actions  

We still need a veteran PG, and a servicable body at the 5. There is no way we go without adding one of those positions. That means the Manuel kid is gone. Quite honestly, I think we need both spots insured, so Wallace to be gone too. The C’s can’t worry about some 14th or 15th spot for some rookie that wasn’t drafted. They are in serious win-now mode and need the insurance incase someone goes down. If Perk gets hurt, or is foul prone, who plays 30 minutes at the 5? Pollard? HAHAHA! No way. What if Rondo has second year issues, who plays the point for 30 mins? House? Ain’t happening. I like Posey a lot, but still need two players.

by Real World on Aug 27, 2007 2:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Po. Have you been missing the POsey pun?

by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I personally am fine with a PG rotation of Rondo, House, and Ray Ray. I think Rondo is going to have a big year and think that when he’s out of the game the team has enough good ball handlers to lessen the load on Eddie and Ray when they are running the show. I can totally envision the C’s running the offense through KG when Rondo is out (and in for that matter) and using House, Allen, and Pierce to spread the floor.

I agree however that it would provide some comfort to have a vet PG here just for insurance purposes in case of injury.

by alchemist on Aug 27, 2007 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I think newyorkceltic and Real World make good points. (I have an urge to defend Pollard, who I think can play 15-20 solid minutes if healthy, maybe more in a pinch, but I’ll let that pass for now.) We do have a couple of genuine needs to fill.

by Eeyore III on Aug 27, 2007 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Getting back to Randy Brown…is he available?

by MBurke15 on Aug 27, 2007 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Pollard is this year’s Wally or the Raef of 3 games. Anything we get out of Pollard is gravy.

I know it’d be a significant pay cut for you, Oh Great One, but it’s your civic duty to sign for the veteran’s minimum and be our backup PG. You’ll need to get rid of that shoot-first mentality, though.

by iowa plowboy on Aug 27, 2007 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Alberto Gonzales is available. Problem, of course, would be his inability to defend anything.

by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 3:33 PM EDT reply actions  

wow – I was missing the PO-sey pun – thanks LJ

plowboy I can still go to the rack but I am very very much like Delonte with the left hand and much like GP with my back to the basket move and that little mini hook shot………………………zzzzzz…don’t wake me up yet 8)

by Master Po on Aug 27, 2007 4:17 PM EDT reply actions  

moskqq, good breakdown of Pruit. Nice analysis. Everything you said is dead-on, but don’t forget Pruit is a rookie, and not a top 5 rookie, either. If Pruit was our starting point, I’d agree with you. But all Pruit has to do is bring the ball up and give it to one of The 3. You or I could probably handle that duty. Then Pruit could hang around 3-point land and take open shots, providing his man double-teams one of The 3. I like the way he played in SL, but like you said, it’s SL.

by Green Bear on Aug 27, 2007 4:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Your friend Bill Klichnev is available, too, James. If Wyc wants to pay for security for the cheerleaders.

by iowa plowboy on Aug 27, 2007 4:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Another player post-Robert Parrish who had a ring when acquired by the Celtics was Stacey King.

A more interesting trivia question is how many players have the Celtics traded away (or just dumped) over the last 10 years who went on to win rings with other teams?

The answer is fourteen: Antoine Walker, Rick Fox, Chauncey Billups, Bruce Bowen, Gary Payton, Eric Williams, Lindsey Hunter, Tony Massenburg, Ben Wallace, Mike James, Brian Shaw, Travis Knight, Joe Kleine, and of course— Robert Parrish himself, who won another ring with the Bulls in 1997.

by Brickowski on Aug 27, 2007 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Was that one of Rush’s talking points today, Iowa? I didn’t notice. Thanks for the update. Po, what about POllard? You’re on a roll.

by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 6:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Brick, Brian Shaw was further back than 10 years.

by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 6:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Brian Shaw played on Phil Jackson’s first championship team in 1999-2000.

by Brickowski on Aug 27, 2007 6:12 PM EDT reply actions  

worked out great in every way. team is gonna be special for the next 4 or 5 years. powerhouse. perfect.

by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:23 PM EDT reply actions  

motown try mentioning that that 32 year old shooting guard had a minor surgery and happens to be a top 5 sg in the entire nba that has been top 10 for mvp, 2nd team all-nba and taken teams to 50 wins division titles and conference finals. pretty sure he looked good already.

by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:50 PM EDT reply actions  

oh yeah, plus coming off his best year.

by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:51 PM EDT reply actions  

celts are gonna win it all. and gonna be a great/SPECIAL team for the next 4 or 5 years.

by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:55 PM EDT reply actions  

REAL LARGE JAMES. RAY PAUL AND KG ARE ALL LEADERS. ALL IN DIFFERENT WAYS AND MATCH PERFECTLY.

by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:58 PM EDT reply actions  

  What made Dennis Johnson a decent point guard was being able to heave it to half court to Larry Bird. A great passing big man solves a lot of point guard problems.

by Wilt on Sep 3, 2007 6:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Thoughts on Celtics vs. Heat
Small
Already Doubting The Celtics?
Small
Start Pavlovic over Ray to cover Dirty Wade
Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi