Instant Bench
And just like that, we have a bench.
When our bench was just House, Pollard, Scalabrine, and a bunch of young or hurt guys, there was plenty of reason to worry. There was a big hole. Tony Allen was the 6th man and he remains a big question mark. If he plays with explosiveness and confidence, great. If not, then there was going to be a lot on the shoulders of Brian Scalabrine.
Insert James Posey and everything seems, …well, a little more rosy.
Posey is the sixth man on this team. He can provide both Pierce and Allen plenty of rest. He can play hard-nosed, lock down defense on the opponent’s best players, meaning even more rest for Pierce and Allen. And he won’t back down from anyone and is perfectly willing to mix it up (as you can see from these youtube clips). He also brings Championship experience to the squad. Basically he’s the perfect fit for what this team was lacking (aside from a backup point guard).
Somehow this actually makes me feel a little better about the point guard position too. Yes, I’m still hoping that the team finds a guy that gets cut from their current team and is willing to play for the vet minimum here. However, adding Posey solidifies the wing position which has a kind of trickle-down effect on the other ones.
House is really more of a shooting guard than a point guard, but he can play the position as a shooting point guard. Our starter really is a pure point guard and an above average defender to boot. Having a gunner for a backup isn’t the worst thing in the world, especially when Posey (defense) is subbing in for Allen or Pierce (offense).
This also keeps Scalabrine from needing to play small forward, which makes him more valuable as a 4, which leaves Scot Pollard to back up the 5.
On the other hand, as a group this bench is very flexible. House can play the 1 or 2. Posey can play the 2 or 3. Scalabrine can play the 3 or 4. Pollard can play the 4 or 5. Once Tony Allen gets back to full speed, that’s 5 legit bench players with NBA experience and versatility. We’re looking at a team that is 9 or 10 deep now.
Of course sometimes bad things happen. There’s always the threat of injury. Or some of these guys might not pan out the way we would hope. With the possible exception of Posey, I have reservations about all of them. House seems one dimensional. Pollard is a year removed from getting any playing time at all. Scalabrine should be better this year, but he's still Scal.
However, we still do have some youth to fill in the gaps where needed. Pruitt is a nice 3rd point guard to have around. Powe and Davis could both challenge for time in the big man rotation. Even Wallace or Manuel (for now) are available in case of injury.
I also admire the way that Ainge is maintaining salary flexibility. They could have used the whole MLE to sign someone to a 5 year deal. But they wouldn’t have enough money to sign other players and they would have been further in luxury tax land year after year. In other words, he could have made the same mistake McHale made getting a guy like Mike James. Instead, he’s added low cost, no-strings guys that might just surprise people. Especially if they gel as a unit. If they work out, great. We can always resign them. If not, we’ll try someone else next year.
This team will go as far as the starters will take them. But the underlying fear since The Trade was that somehow the bench would be their undoing. In one move, Danny made everyone feel a whole lot better about that situation. Ainge has to be the early favorite for GM of the year. He’s done a masterful job. Now the team just has to go out there and win.
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Danny has made the C’s relevant again in just one short off season. We can win the whole thing. Ainge has been rock solid in his handling of the C’s.
Go Celtics
by The Bones on Aug 27, 2007 7:11 AM EDT reply actions
Posey really does answer many of our needs. Lock down wing defender, who can handle a number of positions and also put a few points on the board. And as much as love Rondo, it would still be nice to pick up a veteran backup point. As Motown said, this is just the beginning of the Celtics being back in the game. More fun to come.
I like the signings so far, but to get us over the hump (to contending with the Western big boys, we’re totally in contention in the Leastern Conf.—tho’ I an concerned with Detroit) we need a sixth man in the true Cs tradition: McHale, Hondo, Walton. Posey is a 7th man IMHO, House 8th, Pollard (who I subjectively really like, if healthy) 9th man.
That 6th man is going to have to be a vet-min ring-chasing guy. Unless TA comes back 100% and plays like he did in the month before his latest injury.
So I guess I respectfully disagree that Posey is the 6th man answer, and that we’re tooled to win it all. We’re tooled to compete and maybe win the East. But hey, I’ll take that for now! This is going to be one heck of a season!
I love this signing. I’m not sure If Posey is actaully a great option at SG, but both Ray and Pierce can play the off-guard next to him, House can take a few minutes there, and after the break, TA will be the designated SG defender (unless he’s traded for an extra big, or the vet PG we could still use).
But the versatility Posey does bring is the ability to play small, with Posey, Pierce, Ray, and a PG spreading the floor for KG at center. I really like that lineup as an occasional change of pace.
Posey’s size at SF also make sit easier to play KG and Scalabrini at the 4/5, especially if Pierce is at SG to help with the rebounding. I like Scals as a 5th-option role player. He’s a good defender at PF and a 40% 3-point shooter. Surround Pierce and KG with House, Posey and Scals when Ray is on the bench, and the role players will DESTROY teams from outside if they try to double the All-stars. All three should shoot 40% from 3 this year…
And in terms of the versatility Jeff mentioned, Posey could probably guard some point guards and some big men too. He did a phenomenal job guarding Dirk Nowitzki the year the Heat won the title. He could also do a great job against the likes of Shawn Marion. I wouldn’t be shocked at all to see Doc trot out a lineup of Rondo, Allen, Pierce, Posey, and Garnett at times next year.
I would say that things are shaping up quite nicely for the Celts. Being a die-hard fan for 20 years, it is nice to finally see these guys relevant again. Posey is a nice addition to the fold (has some moxie) and with just one more minor veteran addition (PG) they should be on their way to Eastern Conference supremacy (or at the very least a ride to the conference finals).
by grovcom on Aug 27, 2007 10:48 AM EDT reply actions
There was one more player with a ring after the Chief left Boston. That was the unfogettable (LOL) Zan Tabak. Zan played on the 1994-95 Houston Rockets champinship team and he also played for the Celtics during the 1997-98 season. Zan did not help us very much, the Celtics were 36-46 and did not make the play-offs.
Jeff, agree with all your comments EXCEPT one. Gabe Pruit is not now nor perhaps ever will be “a nice 3rd PG guard option”! Ray Allen, although a pure SG, would be vastly superior to Pruit as a 3rd PG option IMHO.
I wonder if we’re all watching the SAME SL action? It’s obvious that some of us must have blinders on with our player assessments. While I admit that I do concentrate more on the PG position (having once played that position) I may be more critical and demanding in my expectations. However, until I see Pruit perform like a PG, I’m going to maintain my opinion that…he will be a BUST as an NBA PG… “Over and out”!
by moskqq on Aug 27, 2007 11:34 AM EDT reply actions
What’s wrong with Pruit? I saw his summer league play: he played within his game yet played with confidence. He brought the ball up, shot the 3 when he was open, and played smart ball. That’s all you really want from a back-up PG. He won’t need to breakdown the D this year. He (or Rondo or House) just need to get the ball to KG in the High Post Offense.
by Green Bear on Aug 27, 2007 11:42 AM EDT reply actions
While I really, really like the signing, I really, really don’t see how this is instant bench. James Posey all by himself isn’t instant bench. All this talk about lock-down defense seems really exaggerated too. Whenever you hear talk about lock-down defense you hear Bruce Bowen, Ruben Patterson etc. I don’t remember the last time James Posey was mentioned as a lock-down defender until the second we got him. He’s a good defender yes, but the top tier? No way. Heck, I bet Tony Allen in his prime was better than him. The last time he made any defensive honors was back in college as the Atlantic Top 10 Defensive Player of the Year. Since then, as far as I know he hasn’t even been considered for All-NBA Defensive Teams. I think we’re going a little hard on the Kool-Aid.
You have to address your needs, namely PG and C. Our bench is still probably the weakest point in this team, though we have addressed our defense.
But I guess everything is unproven till the season starts.
I need to fast-forward to November.
by newyorkceltics on Aug 27, 2007 11:52 AM EDT reply actions
The two major challenges for this team.
1. Doc Rivers-let’s face it, he’s a nice guy but mediocre coach.
2. Team leadership. This is PP’s team by dint of seniority with the club but PP has never shown great leadership skills. He played second fiddle to the Walker wiggle and I think was more comfortable in that role. Garnett is a born team leader. So, the struggle might be for PP to step aside and let Garnett lead the team. Could be interesting.
by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 12:11 PM EDT reply actions
Re Green Bear; What’s wrong with Gabe Pruit? He has excellent size and athleticism which may have been enough in college. He lacks “court presence” (doesn’t do well anticipating player movement or passing lanes in a timely manner).
He lacks great handles and doesn’t protect the ball well. As a result he needs to play off his defender which negates his use of “body shielding” to get the extra step for penetration. He needs picks to get open for his shots too.
Because he lacks great handles and doesn’t protect the ball well when the defender plays him close he turns his back to the Basket (hardly suitable for a PG to direct the action with his back to the basket).
Pruit seemed tentative about team spacing on the court and lacks the creativity to penetrate to disrupt interior defenses. While he possesses a smooth stroke with range, I failed to see him maneuver to free his shooting hand (couldn’t create his own shot).
I realize that SL performance can be deceiving on many levels but there are certain fundamental tasks that a prospective NBA PG should be able to perform against SL competition….something I failed to see Gabe do.
by moskqq on Aug 27, 2007 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
The Great Master PO said:
Get Gary Payton for minimum if he does not retire!!!!
———————————
Oh Great One, I’d rather sign you to the minimum if you’d be kind enough to take a pay cut. You can shoot, and you might bother to play defense more than one possession per game. Payton still thinks he’s a great player and there’s no way he takes a subordinate role to a one year man without being a disruption.
Gary Payton is well past his prime and his usefullness as a PG has passed. He may have a future as a coach but his playing days are now but distant and fond memories. I’d rather have Ray Allen as a back-up PG because he still has the legs, handles, passing ability and shooting range to make a difference.
We’re only in trouble at the PG position if Rondo fails to perform, gets in serious foul trouble or sustains a serious injury. The resulting magnitude of his absence will dictate an appropriate response by Ainge.
by moskqq on Aug 27, 2007 12:38 PM EDT reply actions
moskqq and plowboy – don’t sugar coat it about GP – tell me how you really feel ;) I say he can still play and mentor but then again I still eric Williams
The real Large James good point about PP and KG. I guess we will find out about The Truth about the Big Ticket and his ability to mesh. I think he will be fine.
Wish I knew more about Posey – never paid much attention to him
We still need a veteran PG, and a servicable body at the 5. There is no way we go without adding one of those positions. That means the Manuel kid is gone. Quite honestly, I think we need both spots insured, so Wallace to be gone too. The C’s can’t worry about some 14th or 15th spot for some rookie that wasn’t drafted. They are in serious win-now mode and need the insurance incase someone goes down. If Perk gets hurt, or is foul prone, who plays 30 minutes at the 5? Pollard? HAHAHA! No way. What if Rondo has second year issues, who plays the point for 30 mins? House? Ain’t happening. I like Posey a lot, but still need two players.
by Real World on Aug 27, 2007 2:00 PM EDT reply actions
Po. Have you been missing the POsey pun?
by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 2:40 PM EDT reply actions
I personally am fine with a PG rotation of Rondo, House, and Ray Ray. I think Rondo is going to have a big year and think that when he’s out of the game the team has enough good ball handlers to lessen the load on Eddie and Ray when they are running the show. I can totally envision the C’s running the offense through KG when Rondo is out (and in for that matter) and using House, Allen, and Pierce to spread the floor.
I agree however that it would provide some comfort to have a vet PG here just for insurance purposes in case of injury.
by alchemist on Aug 27, 2007 2:43 PM EDT reply actions
Alberto Gonzales is available. Problem, of course, would be his inability to defend anything.
by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 3:33 PM EDT reply actions
moskqq, good breakdown of Pruit. Nice analysis. Everything you said is dead-on, but don’t forget Pruit is a rookie, and not a top 5 rookie, either. If Pruit was our starting point, I’d agree with you. But all Pruit has to do is bring the ball up and give it to one of The 3. You or I could probably handle that duty. Then Pruit could hang around 3-point land and take open shots, providing his man double-teams one of The 3. I like the way he played in SL, but like you said, it’s SL.
by Green Bear on Aug 27, 2007 4:22 PM EDT reply actions
Another player post-Robert Parrish who had a ring when acquired by the Celtics was Stacey King.
A more interesting trivia question is how many players have the Celtics traded away (or just dumped) over the last 10 years who went on to win rings with other teams?
The answer is fourteen: Antoine Walker, Rick Fox, Chauncey Billups, Bruce Bowen, Gary Payton, Eric Williams, Lindsey Hunter, Tony Massenburg, Ben Wallace, Mike James, Brian Shaw, Travis Knight, Joe Kleine, and of course— Robert Parrish himself, who won another ring with the Bulls in 1997.
Was that one of Rush’s talking points today, Iowa? I didn’t notice. Thanks for the update. Po, what about POllard? You’re on a roll.
by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 6:02 PM EDT reply actions
Brick, Brian Shaw was further back than 10 years.
by The Real Large James on Aug 27, 2007 6:03 PM EDT reply actions
worked out great in every way. team is gonna be special for the next 4 or 5 years. powerhouse. perfect.
by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:23 PM EDT reply actions
motown try mentioning that that 32 year old shooting guard had a minor surgery and happens to be a top 5 sg in the entire nba that has been top 10 for mvp, 2nd team all-nba and taken teams to 50 wins division titles and conference finals. pretty sure he looked good already.
by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:50 PM EDT reply actions
celts are gonna win it all. and gonna be a great/SPECIAL team for the next 4 or 5 years.
by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:55 PM EDT reply actions
REAL LARGE JAMES. RAY PAUL AND KG ARE ALL LEADERS. ALL IN DIFFERENT WAYS AND MATCH PERFECTLY.
by gocelts34n7 on Aug 27, 2007 6:58 PM EDT reply actions
What made Dennis Johnson a decent point guard was being able to heave it to half court to Larry Bird. A great passing big man solves a lot of point guard problems.
by Wilt on Sep 3, 2007 6:32 AM EDT reply actions
































