You Are Being Heard
With all the attention The Trade is getting, it is no wonder that writers are looking for every angle, including looking for the opinions of fans. This is nothing new, but in the past reporters would go out to the proverbial man-on-the-street. Now, they just log on to sites like this and sift through the comments.
Steve Aschburner quotes several posters from this site in his Sports Illustrated article seen here.
And in case Davis and Blount don't quite get how Jefferson has grown, they should take a look at some random posts from CelticsBlog.com about what Minnesota calls the Garnett trade:
BigalwillwinmoreringsthanKG said:
[Garnett] is replacing a very likeable and albeit a popular player. . . . Big Al will make the C's pay for trading him.
Also quoted are makaveli, TNCeltic, and mobanners.
Say hello to the world.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice work to all! Top shelf. Celtic Pride is back gentlemen
by VinBakersBartender on Aug 8, 2007 6:58 PM EDT reply actions
I only say that because we’re posting conversations withing a community, we’re not speaking on the record. I feel like it would be like a reporter listening in on someones conversation in their home and reporting on it.
by Robb @ CelticsBlog on Aug 8, 2007 7:07 PM EDT reply actions
I only say that because we’re posting conversations withing a community, we’re not speaking on the record. I feel like it would be like a reporter listening in on someones conversation in their home and reporting on it.
This is a public forum. Anything said here is published for the public to digest. There’s no expectation of privacy at all.
All right. I would have figured that Jeff would have to give the go-ahead for it, but eh.
Anyway, it was really cool of that guy to only take the quotes that make it sound like we’re all going to hang ourselves over this trade.
by Robb @ CelticsBlog on Aug 8, 2007 7:14 PM EDT reply actions
At least this guy cited it. Sports Illustrated straight up stole from With Leather and the Fanhouse without any credit (until they got caught).
by professorperkins on Aug 8, 2007 8:43 PM EDT reply actions
Congratulations on the recognition and the quotes. I will say this though, I think this site is as much positive about the KG trade as negative. If this writer is trying to portray that Celt fans in general are totally against the vet moves, that’s the equivalent of a newspaper headline saying Mrs. Lincoln enjoys play at Ford’s Theatre.
by docextension on Aug 8, 2007 9:09 PM EDT reply actions
I think Big Al is an All Star for 6-8 years whether it was in a Celtic, T-Wolf or some other jersey. The thing is though, will Big Al and the cast of merry youngsters eventually win a crown or will it be the Big Trio the Celtics currently have.
I am letting it all ride for the next 4 years on KG/Allen/Pierce.
We already have a long time player (Pierce) with an outstanding career that has gone ringless to this point. I’d rather go for the banner now than to have had Big Al suffer through the same history Pierce has had up to this point.
by docextension on Aug 8, 2007 9:28 PM EDT reply actions
Congratulations to all, and thanks Jeff and all of you who work so hard to provide us the forum!
by blceltsfan on Aug 8, 2007 9:36 PM EDT reply actions
I can’t believe that the posts the SI writer chose to cite are representitave of the sentiment on CB.
Al has a chance to be great, but KG is great. If Al goes on to a stellar 10 years in Minny, good for him. KG has done more for Celtics basketball in the past two weeks than anything in the past 15 years. Just imagine what it is going to be like when they actually start playing.
by TripleOT on Aug 8, 2007 11:42 PM EDT reply actions
And while this is a public forum, the publishing the quotes in a different, likely for profit article is definately copyright infringement without prior permission.
While I’m not an intellectual property attorney, do you have a cite for this proposition? It doesn’t sound correct to me. In fact, I am 100% sure that is incorrect.
Short quotations of another’s work are considered fair use, so long as proper attribution is given. If Peter May quotes Mark Murphy in an article, he doesn’t have to pay him royalties, and the same certainly applies in the case of bloggers.
I’m not sure why you would so definitively state something that is in no way true. You’re 100% wrong, and it’s frustrating when people play wannabe attorney and feed the public misinformation under the guise of knowing what they’re talking about.
Not like attorneys generally know what they’re talking about either. At least that’s been my experience dealing with fellow attorneys.
by Knox Harrington on Aug 9, 2007 12:37 AM EDT reply actions
There are a large number of poor attorneys out there. Those are the ones who should generally keep their mouths shut, and rarely do. I do think a little higher of our apparently shared occupation, though, in that I would say that attorneys ‘generally’ know what they’re talking about; it’s the select few that just make others look bad.
(Many attorneys do have a problem with not being able to say ‘I don’t know’, however, so they’ll BS their way through some half-cocked explanation.)
Quoting material from other sources is standard practice in feature writing. News magazines exist to provide in-depth coverage and analysis of issues and events that are making news. To effectively tell the whole story, you often have to quote the reporting of other media. As long as I attribute the quoted material to the publication it originally appeared in, there’s never any issue. In fact, the sources I quote usually look at it as a free promo for their publication. In this case, the writer clearly stated that the quotes came from CelticsBlog. It’s all good.
As for privacy, as someone stated above, this is a public forum; plus, almost everyone here posts under stupid chat room names like Cousin It. It’s not like anyone knows who we really are, unless we choose to reveal it somehow.
Hobbs you are right, I shouldn’t have said it with such conviction as it is a gray area when dealing with forum posts. They are however treated differently than the main blog posts (like Jeff’s front page articles) and news articles as the nature and intent of a forum or message board post is different.
While a message board post is publicized, it is not in the public domain so it is still copyrighted (though you lose your right to privacy since you publicized the information). The question is of course whether or not it is fair use and in that regard many courts are split as to what to do with forum posts. If a reporter went on the street and interviewed people some would grant permission to use their name and quote, some would grant permission to use the quote without the name, and some would refuse to allow either. That option isn’t given to the person on a message board, which is why it is a gray area. I also should have done more research into how Celticsblog treats the posts, as CBlog could gain a license to use the text of any post and could certainly assign media outlets the right to use them.
My post was irresponsible, but I was responding to the completely and utterly irresponsible reporting in the article. It was a biased slanted piece that picked 4 anonymous posts not knowing if the posts were accurate or truthful representations of actual belief (you often find people that post the otherside whether or not they believe it) and that were a significant minority of the actual sentiment on the blog.
What’s funny about him quoting the wet blanket crowd is that they are the minority here. A typical example of the “new journalism” where you start with a preconcieved agenda and gather “facts” to support your piece. A turn from unbiased reporting (oxymoron in any case) to agenda based reporting. Truly awful.
Baristers, Solicitors and Shysters, OH MY :
Q:What do you call a lawyer with a IQ of 80??
A: Your Honor
Or:
Q: What do you call a Lawyer who went Bad?
A: Senator
by Wilt on Aug 9, 2007 9:11 AM EDT reply actions
Without quoting the previous posts regarding the issue on published material, I am a publisher and can say that quoting from another publication without securing an agreement from the person quoted (as well as the publication) is not allowed. I have faced that situation previously in my magazines due to a freelance article written by a non-staff member that slipped past my editor. We printed a retraction as advised by my attorney after a complaint was registered. In that case, there was no argument about the wording being factual or not (it was). The problem was that it was used without permission.
by lemonadesky on Aug 9, 2007 9:12 AM EDT reply actions
Just re-read the article and Jeff’s comments. Just suppose – suppose, that DA felt due to private information concerning Jeff that he could NOT be re-signed by Boston. That Jeff had his heart set on warm weather? LA? Miami? Dallas? Phoenix? Well, that would now be Minnie’s problem.
If that would be the case: Machivelli would be smiling at Danny from somewhere.
by Wilt on Aug 9, 2007 9:29 AM EDT reply actions
WELCOME TO MY FANTASY EVERYONE!! yesterday i was but a borderline lurker with nary a tommy point, and today i wake up to discover i’m bigger than the Sports Guy! so watch out fellow celticsbloggers, this Afterburner dude has created a monster: my half-baked and ill-informed opinions will come down on all your heads like moses from the mountain! Pruitt? The next Tiny Archibald. Big Baby? The next Barkley. Reggie Miller? The next Reggie Miller. Question not, my people, merely bask in the unblinking light of my decree…
I’d have to know more about the situation in your specific instance, LD. That’s not automatically copyright infringement, as it could again fall under fair use. One of the fair use exceptions is news reporting, which allows quoting. For instance, when Bob Ryan made his comments about Jason Kidd’s wife. If those were made in print, another columnist could take him to task for them. I think that’s fairly well established.
Jeez, I’ve been quoting other people’s news reports and columns the for 20 years, and no one has so much as complained, let alone threaten any legal action.
lemonadesky, are you telling me that when you publish a feature on, say, media coverage of the Iraq war, you get permission from every media outlet you quote? Or when you’re doing a feature on the economy, you get permission before quoting one of the Journal’s analysts?

































