Saras Rumor
WarriorsWorld.net is reporting:
Speaking of Jasikevicius, the Boston Celtics are actively speaking to the Warriors in hopes of landing the seldom used Pg. Boston has offered Glen "Big Baby" Davis and/or Leon Powe but the Warriors have been reluctant thus far. Stay Tuned
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree. I don’t think he’s worth trading either of those two. I’d trade Pruitt or House, but not any of our bigs.
by Green Bear on Sep 14, 2007 7:33 AM EDT reply actions
History has a way of repeating itself. Sometimes it isn’t getting the trade you want but NOT getting the deal you want that proves the better result. That two teams could not find PT for Jasikevicius should tell you that Ainge is trying to make another ill advised move.
by moskqq on Sep 14, 2007 7:38 AM EDT reply actions
Hell no. Saras is trash. He is one of the worst players in the game. I’d rather have Oriene Green back..
by Sweet17 on Sep 14, 2007 8:18 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t think it’s even possible. What is their roster like now? Wouldn’t the warriors have to make a cut if we were to give up Scal and Powe? I mean they love Powe in Oakland, but is Scal suited for nellieball?
by FrieCod on Sep 14, 2007 9:18 AM EDT reply actions
Yeah, it would have to be Scal and one of Powe or Davis for it to work financially. That would also free up a little extra money after this year as this is Saras’ last year. I guess the Warriors might be interested in something like that in order to get a middling big prospect…they do need size.
by nebist on Sep 14, 2007 9:34 AM EDT reply actions
The Warriors want a mobile big that can shoot-sounds like Davis would be there choice…however, this “source” is highly unreliable…it’s no secret that the C’s have had interest in Saras for a while and he does fit in as a playmaker better than Eddie House, but it’s doubtful the team would be looking to part with 2 prospects for him…
I know the team doesn’t covet Glen Davis the way some on the message boards believe, but i’d have trouble believing they’d be willing to trade both Scal and Davis in order to obtain Saras…the C’s would be left with Perk/Pollard and KG/Powe in the frontcourt depth-wise and 2 of the players have injury track histories that would make the depth a bit precarious….
However, the team DOES have the bi-annual to spend and there are a couple of bigs still available, including Brian Skinner who can play both frontcourt positions…so it may not be out of this world to expect some type of exchange where the C’s get Saras AND a 2nd rounder or something like that…still not sure of the likelyhood though…
Rondo/Saras/House
Allen/Allen/House
Pierce/Posey/Allen
KG/Powe/Posey!?!
Perk/Pollard/KG
…it seems like Eddie House or Tony Allen would be regulated to situational sub based off a trade such as this…it is highly unlikely that Boston would trade two players for Saras if HE were to be the situational sub…
Could be that getting rid of Scal’s contract is the objective here, with the team eyeing next year’s MLE and seeing Saras/House off the books would make it easier to spend that money…who knows, perhaps they’re satisfied to let the players battle it out and win jobs…
To make this deal work.We will have to offer more to make the cap work.How about either Powe(hometown guy)and Scal.Plus a couple of #2’s.We only want this guy for a year.Then next season we get a little cap relief.
by keith @ CelticsBlog on Sep 14, 2007 11:51 AM EDT reply actions
Trade doesn’t make any sense; since Scal would have to be involved, you’d be decimating all of our frontcourt depth to pick up a player who I wouldn’t mind having, but who could well not get off the bench. He’s proven less in the league than Eddie House. I really wonder – shouldn’t Saras have absolutely thrived playing Nellie-ball? Why didn’t it work there? Why didn’t it work in Indiana, which desperately needs help at the point?
Is he just a bigger Dickau? (huh, huh…)
Where the trade MIGHT make sense…. if they’re going to bring in someone like Skinner at the vet minimum. Then, you haven’t REALLY hurt the frontcourt depth too badly, and you’ve got another option at the 1. Still not sure I’d be happy with it, but leaving yourself with only Pollard and one of either BBD or Powe to back up the 4/5 would be absurd.
by the_Bird on Sep 14, 2007 12:50 PM EDT reply actions
Oh, and it would give us more flexibility to pursue a later trade for Cassell or Stoudamire. We really ARE lacking in trade chips right now, Saras would be nice just for having his expiring deal. In a sense, he’s more valuable to the team making $4M per than if he’s bought out and we signed him for $1M.
by the_Bird on Sep 14, 2007 12:52 PM EDT reply actions
the_Bird said:
Oh, and it would give us more flexibility to pursue a later trade for Cassell or Stoudamire………….. he’s more valuable to the team making $4M per than if he’s bought out and we signed him for $1M.
Hmmm!
This is the only way it makes sense for us, but does G.S. really want Scalabrine?
Why wouldn’t they keep Sarus and use the expiring in their own deal?
Highly dubious.
by JB_Celticsstuff on Sep 14, 2007 2:42 PM EDT reply actions
I saw and spoke with Big Baby yesterday. I looked him up and down and said you’re not fat, he gave me a big grin. The guy looked in great shape! I’m not sure that translates into a better basketball player but he looked good (so didn’t the girl he was with).
EJPLAYA
I told him about our little dispute (3rd best passer on the team) he said he was going to set you straight and that I knew what I was talking about.
He comes across as a very nice kid, soft spoken and polite.
Yes Jeff, I told him all about this blog.
Yes, dump Powe, dump Baby D. We need more minutes for Scal! WTF
No more double speak. We were told maybe 2 weeks ago that there would be probably no more changes and Danny happy with the point situation. If he really isn’t happy, don’t say squat (maybe something nuetral like we are keeping our options open, etc0. This guy form G.S. has been on the radar for leaving the Warriors for well over a month.
I don’t honestly know enough about him or see his play to form a good/bad opinion. I’m just saying if Perk gets hurt, it is all on Pollard and forcing KG to play center.
by docextension on Sep 14, 2007 4:10 PM EDT reply actions
Saras sucks. PERIOD. He’s too slow for the NBA. Why trade for him when he’s probably going to get bought out at some point during the year? Is Saras better than Hudson? In the words of Borat, NAHT! :)
by Real World on Sep 14, 2007 4:24 PM EDT reply actions

































