Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Daily Babble: The Latest Sign That Portland Got More Than Enough for Zach Randolph

The man is on the trading block.

No, really.  Less than three full months into the first season of his tenure in New York, Zach Randolph is being shopped by Isiah Thomas.  The Oregonian's John Canzano reports that rumors have Randolph likely to end up in Milwaukee.  The Knicks -- headed by one of the league's worst general managers -- are allegedly ready to pull the plug on their association with the man who doubles as their leading rebounder and second leading scorer.  And said GM is right this time around.

Each step Isiah Thomas takes closer to dealing Zach Randolph is one step closer to illuminating just how smart Kevin Pritchard was last summer when he moved Randolph to the Knicks for underachieving big man Channing Frye and in-need-of-a-big-buyout Steve Francis.  At the time, many of us pundits suggested that KP didn't come even close to getting enough for a 26-year-old coming off a season of 23.6 points and 10.1 rebounds per game.  The many are hopefully quickly coming to the realization that becomes more clear with each passing game in New York and Portland: No matter how gaudy the numbers are, simply getting rid of Zach Randolph is more than any team could ever consider enough.

Read More..

All of Steve's daily posts can be found in the CelticsBlog: NBA blog.  Check him out!

Star-divide

Zach Randolph may be the Association's poster boy for addition-by-subtraction right now.

The Blazers dumped Randolph for a backup big and a guard they immediately got rid of and proceeded to lose for the season the franchise big they had just drafted, and they took a quantum leap forward.  That is in no small part due to the loss of Randolph's negative influence in the locker room and his vacancy on the floor, which forced the team to become a more balanced unit and allowed the Blazers to have better defenders on the floor.

Meanwhile, while the Blazers flourish, Randolph is currently one of the primary factors involved in the current destruction of the New York Knicks.  Of course, one wouldn't be so grandiose as to suggest that Randolph is anywhere close to making up all of the vast catastrophe occurring in the Sizable Apple these days, but so far as the 2007-08 incarnation of the 'Bockers is concerned, Z-Bo is as much of a reason as any as to why this team loses on a night-to-night basis.

No matter what the points and boards say, Zach Randolph's presence will more often than not be far more of a detriment to his own team than to the opponents.  On the offensive end of the floor (the part of the game he actually plays), Randolph gets his points but monopolizes the ball on offense and generally doesn't make his teammates better.  He doesn't move well without the ball and doesn't work hard on his positioning before the ball gets to him in the post.  In order to be effective, Z-Bo almost invariably needs the ball in the high post or on the right wing, such that he can take his several jab-steps before settling on any of his three primary options: a jumper from the wing, a running lefty baby hook into the midst of the lane or a drive down the right base line.  He isn't a great passer, so once he gets going in the high post, the possibility of another Knick getting a good look before a Randolph shot goes up is highly questionable.

Folks, that last paragraph describes the strongest part of Zach Randolph's game.  It is all downhill from here.

To describe him as a terrible defensive player is unjust.  If Randolph were a great offensive player who gave his all defensively but just wasn't good enough, well, that at least might be tolerable.  But it isn't the case.  Instead, he is a talented (that would be 'talented', not 'great'; big difference) scorer who can't be bothered to be remotely interested in the most effort-based portion of the game.  The truth is that he may have eclipsed team and league leader Eddy Curry in "possessions loafed back on defense" on the season, and once he manages to get down to the other end of the floor, his best function is to take up space.  Randolph doesn't seem to "do" defensive rotations, doesn't close out on shooters and flatly refuses to help on penetrating guards and slashers.

He just doesn't care.  For all the heralding that goes on of his hard work in the weight room during the off-season year after year, the man puts absolutely zero into the game's most effort-oriented component.  He cares about getting his and filling up the stat sheet.  It is evident in the lack of effort defensively.  It is evident in the body language that indicates that in Zach's mind, the next possession on which he isn't fouled will be the first.  Similarly, the next time he commits a foul will be the first as well.

It is particularly evident when he makes the most deplorable defensive play the NBA has seen in several years, as detailed in my Pacers-Knicks Babblings back in mid-December:

  • [Randolph] deserves his own bullet point for the most criminal defensive play of the night, which came at 1:20 of the second quarter.  After an Indy miss, Randolph failed to get a rebound, as Troy Murphy tipped it away from him.  As Murphy dribbled the ball back to the right wing to reset the offense, Randolph tilted his head, tugged his jersey, yelled at the referee, and walked around in a circle.  All of this occurred just outside the low block, ten feet away from Murphy, who calmly spotted up and canned a trey with no defender within miles of him.  Unpardonable.
  • Once again, diehard Knicks fan and Money from the Parking Lot author Bill 'Willy Po' Powell joined me in attendance of this game.  His thoughts after the fact were brief: "I called 'em like I saw 'em tonight.  I saw Zach Randolph.  I called him a bum.  Easy."  He also insisted on replaying the aforementioned Randolph play 15 times when watching the game film later.  Yeesh.

Zach Randolph couldn't behave on or off the floor in Portland (think fights with teammates, strip club grieving practices).  His departure was one of the best moves the franchise has made in the last decade.  He hasn't gotten himself in off-court trouble in New York yet, but for all his points and boards, he has given his own team all the trouble it can handle on the court this season.  The man is not a winner.

What Isiah Thomas can get from the Milwaukee Bucks -- or any other suitors -- for Zach Randolph doesn't even matter.  Getting rid of one of the league's biggest problems is all that does at this point.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Oh man, Canzano just can’t stop hunting for and embarrassing Zach Randolph. You’d think he’d let it go after he left town, but not Canzano. That lad knows how to hold a grudge.

Well I disagree with the conclusion. I agree with all the points about his strengths and weaknesses of his game but not with the conclusion. Zach is not an addition by subtraction player, he’s merely been in bad situations where it’s developed into that. He wasn’t the cause of it.

Is he a top player? Absolutely not, not until he starts correcting those weaknesses in his game – his petulance with referees, his defense, too many bad shots.

This is a guy who averaged 20-10 when playing next to Sheed, Reef, Ratliff and Dale Davis. He had no problem playing next to any of these guys. He worked well with them all, he and Sheed were the only two guys that work well with all combinations out there. He’s also the guy that became their 6th man when they still had Sabonis in town. He’s played well with good players. This is a guy that can play with good players. It’s not his fault NY have the most unbalanced team in the league or that Portland wasn’t ready last year.

This isn’t a guy that lacks effort either, he lacks focus. His effort on the glass is tremendous on either side of the court. His effort coming back from a grueling rehabilitation was superb. His effort in constantly adding to his offensive arsenal throughout his career has been excellent. Notice that none of these things are defense or team based … that’s focus not effort. The man will put in the work he just needs some more guidance.

You can have all the leadership in the world on the bench[/u] (read Nate McMillan)[u] but it doesn’t mean a thing if you don’t have leaders on the court. Zach hasn’t had any in awhile now and he certainly isn’t one himself. He needs a team that isn’t full of knuckle-heads just as much as every other player in the league does, actually he needs it more so than most.

This is a guy who’s reputation since the minute he entered the league was as a follower. A guy who’ll make bad decisions when around bad people, but also a guy who’ll make good decisions when around good people. It’s been a constant throughout his life and career.

Whatever team that can put him in a good situation is going to get a steal.

If his new team can’t put him a good situation, it will just be history repeating itself all over again for Zach.

by Who on Jan 11, 2008 3:41 AM EST reply actions  

i agree with you steve as you may remember from other posts. i agree with most of what the astute who blogs about the c’s, but i see zach killing the knicks. while with comparable stats to kg, he is actually the anti-kg, little intensity and leadership. i don’t think he makes anyone else better. i shudder at what zeke has done in ny- he is the anti-danny. zeke and dolan running an organization is a suicide watch. the fans need to boycott the games to stop them from making money and either wake up stern or somebody to get something functional done.

by nazzbo on Jan 11, 2008 7:49 AM EST reply actions  

At the time, I said I wouldn’t trade Wally straight-up for Randolph, and I meant it. I doubt Danny would have, either.

by Roy_Hobbs on Jan 11, 2008 7:49 AM EST reply actions  

The critical moment for the Knicks future will occur quietly, when the owner decides whether to can Zeke and let someone new trade that big slacker. That’s a big contract, and it will shake somebody’s franchise to the core for half a decade.

by Monponsett on Jan 11, 2008 9:52 AM EST reply actions  

Randolph is an overpaid black hole who doesn’t defend, doesn’t run the floor and has a rap sheet. Why would Milwaukee want a player like that? What would be Yi’s role if the Bucks acquired Randolph? Sure, the Bucks would love to dump the overpaid Bobby Simmons and Dan Gadzuric, but Randolph is even more overpaid.

I have no doubt that Randolph is being desperately shopped around the league, but I can’t imagine that there would be any takers.

by Brickowski on Jan 11, 2008 10:08 AM EST reply actions  

I love the part about “walked around in a circle”.

That’s the best.

by mcpu40 on Jan 11, 2008 10:15 AM EST reply actions  

Can we get a link to a youtube video on that walking around in a circle part?

That’d really make my day.

Please, anyone have this?? I’ve gotta see it.

by mcpu40 on Jan 11, 2008 10:17 AM EST reply actions  

mcpu40,

Bahhhhhhhhhh. I’ve got the game film, but I’m an old-fashioned dude who still records onto VHS. I’ll spend some time today trying to get a clip off the Internet and get it posted here. It’s really unbelievable.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 10:19 AM EST reply actions  

Steve, THANKS THANKS THANKS!

Hope to see it soon!!

by mcpu40 on Jan 11, 2008 11:19 AM EST reply actions  

Who,

How much do you know about the relationship between Canzano and Randolph? I noticed last night while reading the comments to his column that there was a lot of similar sentiment voiced from his readers regarding some grudge Canzano holds, much of which ran along the same lines as your first comment. Obviously it would date back to Z-Bo’s time in Portland, but do you know much about the history there? I know nothing of it, and I’m curious.

Regarding your comments about Zach, I understand your “good situation” theory, but what it comes down to for me is this then:

I think it’s fair to say that the Celtics have won of the best situations in the league right now. Their on-floor leadership is as good as any in the game, and whether we on the outside like the coach or not, he is a players’ coach who has the respect and attention of his team. Furthermore, they are playing great basketball, and they could always use more big man help.

I wouldn’t take Zach Randolph on this team in a million years, no matter how little the Celts had to give up for him. I realize that he and KG play the same position making it somewhat impractical anyway, but even in a lineup where one of the two moved over to the center spot or Randolph gave the Celts’ help off the bench, I wouldn’t want any part of this guy. I hate to use the term “cancer,” but I firmly believe that he is a team-killer. All his scoring and boards don’t make him worth the behavioral risk and the near-certainty that is his lack of focus.

Our team has one of the best situations in the league right now, and I wouldn’t want Zach Randolph to become a part of it at any price. Would you?

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

nazzbo,

As always, it takes you few words to make your point quite clear. Couldn’t agree more.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 12:22 PM EST reply actions  

Brick,

Fair enough.

Just to clarify, because I’m not sure how you read it, my point in the column wasn’t that the Bucks will make a deal but simply that anyone saying “But who are the Knicks going to get back from Milwaukee?” may want to consider that it doesn’t matter who comes back. All that matters is who goes out. If the Knicks can make any sort of Z-Bo trade, they should do it. Immediately.

Much as I would like to agree with you about there being no takers, the sad part is that as is almost invariably the case in sports, it is more likely than not that some exec will believe that within his front office, his coaching staff and his players he has the great therapeutic remedy who will help influence Randolph into turning his ’tude around and putting all that scoring and boarding potential to good use. Someone will see the numbers he can put up and have their eyes light up thinking that “all it will take is to get him to be more focused,” and sadly, someone will likely be sucked in.

Long as Danny isn’t that guy (which he certainly won’t be with regard to Randolph), I’m not complaining.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 12:26 PM EST reply actions  

That’s part of the major problem with baskeball: Guaranteed contracts.

Here’s some contracts or signings that have crippled teams off the top of my head:
Blount, Randolph, GRANT HILL, Reggie Lewis, Len Bias, Pervis Ellison, Steve Francis, Stephon Marbury, Wally, feel free to add to the list.

They get paid, and stop playing.
Perhaps Grant’s contract he got hurt, or was hurt, whatever, but it crippled Orlando for years…

Imagine if KG blows out a knee, DONE, DONE, DONE.

by mcpu40 on Jan 11, 2008 1:01 PM EST reply actions  

Steve, I don’t believe any team has a trade exception large enough to acquire him for nothing, and no team with cap space will waste it on him. Therefore, the team acquring Randolph will have to relinquish between 11-15 million in salary. Given that fact, I don’t see any plausible deals out there.

For starters, Randolph would have to go to a team with a veteran HOF-caliber coach who would have no qualms about benching him or even sending him home when he went into his selfish act, as the Bulls did with Tim Thomas. But no coach like that would want him.

The dearly departed duo of John Nash and Steve Patterson were the only ones stupid enough to give him that ridiculous contract, and the soon-to-be-departed Isiah Thomas is the only one stupid enough to trade for him. That ought to tell you something right there.

by Brickowski on Jan 11, 2008 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

Steve,

Canzano hates Zach Randolph. He doesn’t just go after his playing or his leadership but he makes comments on his personal life and the types of people he hangs out with it. I can’t remember the nickname for Zach’s group of friends or if Canzano created it, but he surely repeated it at every possible moment. Canzano hated a bunch of people in Portland, a lot of it has to do with how he was treated by the organization. Similar to some of the media in NYC right now (can’t think of his name, daily news writer, ah Frank Isola). The guy holds a grudge and never lets go. You’d think he’d let it go after Portland traded Zach but obviously not.

It’s been interesting too because he seems to be giving Darius Miles a clean slate to work from. He’s written several very positive articles on Darius and his recovery from surgery over the past few months. And he’s has clearly given Pritchard and the rest of the new management the welcome treatment. But Zach ….

It’s been a long standing issue from Canzano. I like his work a lot but he holds grudges and he takes them out on his column. He makes a lot of negative comments which have nothing to do with basketball like the one about Zach and his friends in Milwaukee.

It’s amazing too because the rumour is so evidently false. It’s clear he just wanted to take a shot at Zach Randolph and embarrass him. There’s no way Milwaukee can take Zach with Yi and Bogut being considered their future core and with Charlie V already backing them up. Especially with Larry Harris, who likes the young and athletic type of player. Harris simply won’t be a fan of Zach Randolph, look at all the guys he’s signed so far. And then for a third strike they simply don’t have anything NY want because Redd is certainly not on the table ….. and that’s making the jump to where Zeke is shopping him which I’d bet against, at least not at this point. Zeke has too much pride for that.

by Who on Jan 11, 2008 1:14 PM EST reply actions  

Brick,

I sure hope you’re right. I’m as big a Knicks-hater as the next guy, and even I’m having a hard time watching him kill them night after night. Here’s hoping I’m giving GMs around the league too little credit.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 1:25 PM EST reply actions  

Steve,

To answer the second part of your question.

This is very simple. It’s not always about which player has the most talent or ability. It’s about whether or not they complement what’s already there. That’s what sets top teams apart, they have players with roles and complementary skill-sets.

So the question is does Zach have a skill set for the C’s? The answer to that depends on his role. As a starting centre? No. As our primary backup big off the bench, where he’d take say 24-28mpg? Absolutely. I think he’d be a great fit.

KG needs a a big burly centre next to him. Someone who eats space. Someone who blocks shots. Someone who plays great defense and someone who can play man-to-man defense against the bigger bodies in the league. KG needs that. So the C’s need that. Zach doesn’t bring that to the table.

Perk is clearly worse but what he brings to the table is more valuable than what Zach does. Thus, he makes the team better than Zach would.

I think there are plenty of teams where Zach can help them out. He just needs to be in a place where is skill set complements his teammates, and has teammates who are ready and able to play. Preferably with some veterans who can keep the guy on track.

Everyone that has ever known Zach and made a comment about him have said he’s a good guy and he’s obviously a workhorse off the court and at some parts of his game on the court. Guys like that just need guidance.

by Who on Jan 11, 2008 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

Who,

Thanks for dropping the knowledge about Canzano. I’ll have to try and go through his archives and see what he has said in the past. Word is that he is a very good columnist over at The Oregonian, but I guess this is part of his rep. I’ll see what I can find on him.

Agreed that I was surprised to hear any rumors of Z-Bo being shocked, because like you, I have a hard time seeing such a quick admission of guilt from Zeke. But hey, maybe he had a moment of brightness were the light bulb flickered for a few moments. Ya never know.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 1:28 PM EST reply actions  

I’m still waiting for that clip of Zach walking around in a circle.
Just thinking about that makes me laugh out loud…seriously.

by mcpu40 on Jan 11, 2008 1:58 PM EST reply actions  

mcpu40,

Trust me, it’s worth it. Sadly, between YouTube and a couple of other sites, I’m having a lot of trouble tracking it down online. I could have sworn the ESPN.com game video highlights had it after the game, but now all they have is a 50-second clip that doesn’t include the play. I’ll keep looking though.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 2:29 PM EST reply actions  

Steve, thanks for your dedication to excellence.

by mcpu40 on Jan 11, 2008 2:31 PM EST reply actions  

mcpu40,

Anytime. Thanks for the kind words.

As I wrote in the column, I went to this game with a good friend who happens to be a diehard Knicks fan. We watched the game film at about 2 a.m. as I wrote the column, and he might have cancelled out the time saved by fast-forwarding commercials with the number of times he replayed this play. Literally 18 by his count when all was said and done.

-sw

by Steve Weinman on Jan 11, 2008 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

Word is that he is a very good columnist over at The Oregonian, but I guess this is part of his rep.

Oh, Canzano’s very good. The Oregonian on a whole have great Blazer coverage. Joe Freeman and Jason Quick are their other main guys. They led the charge against the organization over how it was run, how they treated the media and the types of players they were signing. Some of it was messy, dirty and very embarrassing to the Blazers head office. Lots of fans grew tired of it, probably why Canzano’s piece on Zach got such a mixed reaction. The club has moved on and so too seemed the media. Felt out of place for Canzano to bring it back, he carried the most venom at the time, he should leave it alone. Canzano’s coverage since the draft has been very positive every time I’ve read it. Out of place.

We’re likely going to see the same thing happen in NY. The columnists tone is already heading that direction. The snide remarks are starting but not with regularity yet (some of it is still fun-natured and not so much with the vindictiveness). How the Knicks are treating the media is going to make it personal and soon enough it will deteriorate pretty badly.

You’ve probably seen this before, but if you haven’t this is the detailing of a Blazer pracitce – the one before they began their win streak:
http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/sports/1198986908219800.xml&coll=7

That’s quality reporting. Don’t find that in many places.

by Who on Jan 11, 2008 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Who, I respectfully disagree. Randolp wouldn’t be a good fit in Bostn or anywhere else, no matter what role he was given.

The offense dies as soon as he touches the ball. His presence would also be the end of ubuntu. Zach is all about Zach. He couldn’t give two figs about the other players on the floor. In fairness to Zach, off the court he’s a great teammate, always willing to take his buddies down to the local strip club.

by Brickowski on Jan 11, 2008 4:00 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?
Small
MVP's in Game7

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi