Ainge Will Not Cut Scal
Bulpett of the Herald reports:
Celtics boss Danny Ainge, however, insists Scalabrine still can play a role, pointing to the run in late January and early February when he filled in for Kevin Garnett.
"I have no intention of cutting Scal," Ainge said. "It’s early. We think Scal can help us. Last year when KG got hurt, Scal started and we were 7-2 in those games. Our team defense was even better. I’m not saying he’s a better defensive player than KG, but we were able to maintain things and play good team defense."
Doc Rivers also appreciates Scalabrine.
"He’s an energy player," the coach said. "He comes off the bench and can play (both forward spots). He’s a veteran. Defensively he makes very good basketball decisions. Offensively he’s got work to do."
There you have it boys and girls. In black and white. Barring some kind of trade, Scal is going to be somewhere on the roster this year.
As Bulpett explains in the column, it isn't so much a matter of the team being unwilling to cut a guy making $6M over the next two years. They simply want to have him on the roster in case they come up with a trade where they'll need to match salaries. Keep in mind that if you combine Scal, Eddie House, and Tony Allen, you get $8.7M in expiring salaries in 2010 without having to ship out Ray Allen. I'm just sayin....
In other news, Darius Miles hasn't really wowed anyone yet, but he might still have some hope to make the roster if the team goes with the Coach Cassell option. Marc Spears reports:
Guard Sam Cassell, who has a guaranteed contract, sat out last night and has played in only one exhibition. When asked if Cassell could be an assistant coach and not a player when the season starts, Rivers said, "I don't know yet. We'll see." The Celtics have 16 players on their roster and must cut one before the season begins. The only player with a non-guaranteed deal is forward Darius Miles
We discussed this at length on Monday. I still think it is our best option.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
With all the good Danny’s done, he gets a mulligan with Scalabrine. I recall at the time a lot of posters being shocked that Scal was offered a five year pact, now that chicken is coming home to roost. There is no doubt that if Scal had an expiring contract it would not have been renewed this year. If Scal gets any serious minutes this year we will be in big trouble; he used to be able to hit the three, he doesn’t even do that anymore. It seems there’s always a hanger- oner ( remember Waltuh ) and I guess Scal will be it for the next two years. He is painful to watch in action.
by halfman/halfoyster on Oct 15, 2008 7:45 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t think it’s all bad if Scal is around and Cassell starts the season as an assistant coach. It will mean nobody has to leave the roster for now and buys more time to figure out what to do.
BTW 8.7 Mil in expiring contracts is not enough to bring in one of the prized players from the 2010 free agent class. Ray alone makes about double that.
I’d like to hear from Danny if he can tell us what his plans for Powe and Davis are since both will be free agents next summer.
And what are you going to say Mr Jeff if Scal is not inactive, but rather flexing those massive pecs and his “manzier” over on the bench? I think I noticed one of Scals ipod songs was “If White could Jump”. Jumping is the least of his problems. Miracle Johan should write a song called “If Scal could jump then he would……….errrr ummmm never mind. I don’t get it but then again I am not paid to get it. Can’t believe I forgot the game was on NBAtv last night. I writing a song now as we speak "If Po Could Think”
Sam as coach would be the best solution now. He can always practice and stay in shape during the year and come back to the team in february-march to help in the playoffs. In the meantime:
- There could be a trade that leaves one roster open
- Miles can be tested during some months and if it doesn’t turn out well we can waive him in january…
Great news about Scal. He’s a valuable piece.
Scal shouldn’t be judged on his preseason games, the guys he’s playing alongside aren’t the ones he’ll play with in the regular season. Scal should be judged on the 9 games he started last year, and when he played very well.
Scal is a good utility player for a team to have.
EJPLAYA – and if you didn’t “defer to Danny’s judgement” then what exactly would you defer to? You would have an opinion? Ahhhhh the opinion in which you just stated that “Scal is good for the team”? Don’t portray the complainers as only reading box scores. How do you know “Scal complainers” only read box scores? I saw 80 games last year and all the playoff games and the same is true in mnay years prior. I have been watching Celtic basketball since 1967. You think he is good for the team well then good for you. I think he sucks. Nice guy, tries hard but he sucks. Don’t paint complainers as uneducated or non-watchers.
Peace
I will definitely side with the Master on this one. Scal sucks. Period. While I can understand the logic of ‘using’ him which in essence is what it is…using his contract for future good, I can’t stomach seeing him come in games. Basically this is just a wasted spot that’s oh ‘hold’ for future consideration. We will have a 14 man roster plus Scal. That’s the way I see it. Sorta like the old time musical groups…Smokey Robinson & The Miracles, Martha and the Vandellas; The Boston Celtics and Brian Scalabrine. I am not one to usually pick on the pathetic but I hate the fact that he’s just a wasted spot on the roster. I dont care that he knows the system…it seems like he’s been here since Dino Radja was here, of course he’d know the system. He hustles…um, let me see. How many rebounds do I see him crashing the boards for? How many charges does he take, how many loose balls does he goes into the stands for? Sorry, I dont buy the hustle aspect either. When he’s on the floor he’s a brick in a china store. I would keep Miles all day over him if it came down to who doesnt make the team. Miles can actually be an investment that will pay off next season and beyond. Once he gets back into basketball shape he will be just fine. Those judging him on 4 preseason games just dont get it. It’s not like I’m his campaign manager but he has talent. Scal on the other hand….well…he has boobs. You make the call!
You go, Po. I think Danny sees Scal as a vet big body who is sort of like Hank Findel to Garnett’s Dave Cowens (even if Powe is a solid backup PF). But really, the point is obvious that Danny wants to squirrel that contract away for future usage, and in that case Ainge is being smart. Maybe a bit risky, but smart.
My heart says cut Scal. My head says keep him for future packaging. But oy, no matter the Celtics’ record while KG was out, Scal inarguably is painful to watch especially on offense. (For he does “offend.”)
I couldn’t care less about Scalabrine one way or the other. He’s not going to be on the roster after next year anyway.
What I do care about is retaining and developing young talent against the day when the “big 3” start to decline.
If the rules permitted a 16-17 man roster I would have no problem with keeping Scalabrine and Cassell. But the rules do not. Therefore I go with youth and raw talent over a fading veteran has-been (in the Case of Cassell) or never-was (in the case of Scalabrine).
How Scal ranks among or bigs?
- he’s the 2nd best venturing out on the perimeter offensively and defensively.
- he’s our 2nd best screener (I know screens aren’t as fancy as, say, assists, they don’t appear in box scores and one can’t see them if he’s only watching the on-the-ball action, but good screeners are very valuable for a team).
- he’s our 2nd best team defender.
- he’s our 3rd best 1×1 defender, assuming he’s guarding PFs who don’t play in the low post (those are a rarity in the league nowadays anyway).
- he’s one of the worst rebounders but is very good boxing out, a skillset that never hurts a team.
Why we should get rid of this guy considering our current bench situation is beyond my comprehension.
So far this preseason, Scalabrine has brought more negatives than positives. Even a Scal supporter like me has to admit he doesn’t appear to have NBA reflexes and he sure is hell shoots bricks.
But, he is what Doc called him – an energy guy. He hustles on defense, he understands the offensive flow and doesn’t bust the play very often. Situations can call for him. Relax, Scal critics. He’s not going to play much.
What I find interesting is that his shot is now all mental and wasn’t he one of those guys that was a positive thinking disciple. What happened
31 comments and counting for a guy who’s pretty much a non-factor. I’ve never understood the Scal hate. For my money, guys like Theo Ratliff and Scott Pollard were much bigger disappointments, and much better targets for our scorn and derision. At least Scal shows up to practice.
Pollard was a vet minimum signing who contributed more than Scal when he was on the court.
This might be brilliant and excellently patient big picture thinking from Ainge.
Sign Sam Cassell to an assistant coach deal…for now. Sam the coach is around and teaching on and off the court but Sam the player is unemployed and still a free agent who could sign later down the road. Meanwhile, one of the borderline guys on the roster gets a chance to stick with the C’s during an extended audition.
I don’t think there is any rule that he can’t also do the PJ Brown thing and sign with them later, if they later feel like they need to make a move and cut somebody or do a 2 for 1.
by waltzero on Oct 15, 2008 10:36 PM EDT reply actions





















