On the Adam Morrison Problem
A Daily Babble Production
In the less-than-two-weeks-until-the-games-count zone, one never knows what sort of topics will catch a few eyes in the interim between proclaiming different Celtics prospects future superstars.
This past week, Bobcats forward Adam Morrison has been generating some lively discussion in the CelticsBlog forums. What started as an innocently posed question about the prospects of the Celts trading for Morrison turned into a discussion of the former Gonzaga star's merits as a prospect in this league. Since I'm generally at the head of the line in the "Let's not make too many value judgments about a player on a small sample size" crowd, but I've been unable to apply that reasoning in Morrison's situation, it seems worth taking a few moments to go against my traditional course of rationale in laying out the case against Morrison's long-term prospects.
Read More..All of Steve's daily posts can be found in the CelticsBlog: NBA blog. Check him out!
By virtually any measure, Morrison had an unimpressive rookie season in 2006-07. Despite getting nearly 30 minutes per game in 78 contests, he managed a shade less than three rebounds per game, and he was a liability at the defensive end at both the three and the four for Charlotte. Worst of all was the disaster of a year he had shooting the basketball. The guy who had posted a true shooting of 60.5 percent in his final season at Gonzaga couldn't break 40 percent from the field or 34 percent from the three-point line, and his true shooting for the season was a miserable 45.5 percent. He scored nearly 12 points per game, but it took him 12.1 field-goal attempts per game to do so, and the Bobcats were actually 4.6 points per 100 possessions less effective offensively with him on the floor than off it. Not particularly encouraging stuff.
What normally is encouraging is the fact that it was only year one. Getting off to a sluggish beginning at this level and improving noticeably in the next couple of years is far from unheard of. But what separates Morrison from many other slow-starting prospects is that even when he was playing excellent basketball at Gonzaga, with the exception of his shooting, he rarely if ever provided much indication that he has the rest of the skill set or physique needed to be successful at this level.
Morrison has never been an exceptional rebounder. Despite playing more than 36 minutes per game in his final season at Gonzaga and spending time at the power forward spot against smaller players, Morrison grabbed only 5.5 boards per game. At 6-foot-8 and 205 pounds, he is built as a tweener between the three and the four for the NBA, and his size doesn't lend to his being any more of a dominant rebounder than he was in college. His rookie season wasn't an aberration on the boards. It was what it should have been given his body and lack of rebounding prowess in the first place.
The same is true on the defensive end. Morrison wasn't exactly known as a defensive stalwart during his days as one of the most prolific amateur players in the country, and there isn't much basis for expecting that to change at the next level. For the most part, he doesn't have the quickness to guard small forwards, and the aforementioned 205-pound frame doesn't leave him with the strength to bang with too many power forwards either. When an unspectacular defender in the collegiate game jumps a rung to playing against better athletes who physically outclass him, it seems reasonable to believe that he isn't going to amount to much as a stopper.
The issue of the shooting is a bit different. This was expected to be Morrison's one transferable skill to the Association. He had a great final amateur campaign shooting the basketball from the outside, knocking down more than 42 percent of his three-point attempts while leading the country in scoring with 28.1 points per game. Morrison shot the ball well both inside and out, leading to the aforementioned true shooting of 60.5 percent. It seems fair to expect that the shooting figures will improve over the next few years. Morrison shot 76 percent from the foul line over this three years in college, and there is no reason to believe that he won't be able to regain that accuracy rather than the 71 percent he shot as a rookie. He might not shoot 40 percent from the NBA three-point line, but the figure probably won't stay as low as 33.7 percent for much longer either.
But while the three-point and free throw accuracy might imrpove, it is highly unlikely that Morrison will be anything close to the type of dynamic scorer he was in college. At that level, his frame made him a legitimate power forward, and he did plenty of scoring on the interior. Once again, Morrison doesn't have the strength, bulk or (in lieu of the former two attributes) quickness to make it palatable to expect him to score inside in the NBA with anywhere near the proficiency he did in college. The fact that only 14 percent of his shot attempts came from the interior as a rookie doesn't represent much of a disparity from what was expected of Morrison. Further, it's important to remember that a good portion of his scoring at Gonzaga came from the fact that he was earning more than nine trips per game to the foul line in his last season. If he isn't going to be able as effective inside anymore, he isn't going to draw as many fouls - or anywhere close to as many fouls. His decline to 2.6 free throw attempts per game as a rookie was a product of that.
If Morrison isn't scoring inside or a threat to get to the foul line, opponents will be able to pay more attention to staying in his face on the perimeter. The added defensive attention outside thanks to the lost dimension of his interior scoring is naturally going to bring his perimeter efficacy down. Once he gets a bit more accustomed to the league, it shouldn't be as low as it was in 2006-07, but it will still be tougher to get good looks from deep than it once was for Morrison. He just doesn't have the quickness to keep defenders honest on the outside.
Adam Morrison doesn't have NBA-level quickness at the three or strength at the four. He wasn't a great rebounder or defender to begin with, and scoring will be a considerably more daunting task for him in the pros than it was in college. And on top of all that, he is now coming off of a season off the court thanks to a torn ACL. Those factors considered with how poorly a healthy Morrison played in his rookie season make it reasonable to expect the former Gonzaga star to amount to little more than perhaps a decent spot-up shooter in the Association.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
WOW my trade idea turned into a front page story on Celticsblog! Can I get a TP???
by WeMadeIt17 on Oct 18, 2008 11:12 AM EDT reply actions
Adam Morrison is being written off too early.
His horrible efficiency as a rookie had nothing to do with a lack of shooting ability, but instead were because of his disgustingly poor shot selection. There’s massive room for improvement here. This is a guy who in the past (college) has shown himself to be an intelligent player (scorer), so the chances of him figuring it out are pretty good. Coaching, experience and maturation are needed. He can become a good scorer (15-18ppg) in this league.
The rest of his game contains a lot of inherent problems which will be very difficult for him to fix. It’s hard to make expectations on him in any one of the other areas, that end up falling in a million different places.
If I had to pick the next easiest area for him to improve, I’d say it’s the defensive end. He has good reactions and intelligence, no reason why he can’t become an average team defender. How he does for Larry Brown over the next 12 months will likely be very telling in this department.
Steve, obviously from my input in the thread I agree with everything you say (I, as you, usually argue it is too early to tell) and your analysis is spot on. Before the 2006 draft, I argued long and hard with a member of this site from the Northwest region (whose name escapes me) who thought in short order that Morrison would be a 20/8/5 guy in the NBA, while I could not understand why he was a first round pick never mind a high lottery pick.
Morrison reminds me of so many college Heisman quarterbacks who perform spectacularly in college, but who just do not have the tools to make it in the NFL. Often, the scouts already know this in football and the guy drops to a late round pick. For the life of me, I could not figure out how any GM watching Morrison and Brandon Roy (or Rudy Gay, Rondo, or a number of others for that matter) would think Morrison had a better NBA future. And the Morrison hype was always that he was this gritty, passionate player, yet when I watched him play I saw one of the most passive defensive players I have ever seen in the college game (even in NCAA tournament games, when you expect him to turn it on, his defensive effort was minimal), who rebounded only by accident, and who would suddenly spring into action when he could score. That did not strike me as the profile of a guy who wanted to win so badly; at best, he did not understand his contribution to team success can not stop at “designated scorer.”
Your description of his physical limitations just encapsulates the other dimension that make his NBA prospects so bleak IMO. Without a well-rounded game, even a well-round array of scoring options, his lack of athleticism (even before the ACL) is the final nail in his coffin. At best, I think he becomes the Eddie House of small forwards, but I think even House has more to his game than Morrison does, and probably with House’s quick release has that one aspect that is so good that it keeps him around in the league. I don’t think Morrison has any single such transcendent skill to compensate for his limited game. I think we’re looking more at a Luke Jackson type career for Morrison.
Morrison reminds me of an 80s player from BYU named Devin Durrant. He was close to a college player of the year in ‘83-84 and made the game look so easy. He was amazing in the NBA tournament. His game was also a clone of Morrison’s….Without the hair, porn mustasche, or Morrison’s intensity. The results were the same in college, though. Not to mention the NBA. He got drafted late by the Pacers but it never occurred to any team to draft him early. Like Morrison, he had no physical gifts that translate to the next level. I don’t see Morrison being a better player than Durrant was then. Morrison is just like Durrant was. An undersized, physically limited player with a basketball IQ off the charts.
Hank summed it up pretty well. If Morrison wasn’t scoring, he wasn’t helping out the ’Zags much; his scoring prowess and occasional key rebound distracted from his underwhelming contribution without the ball in his hands.
I agree with Who that Morrison has a chance to still be an impact shooter, but I’d be worried about his confidence at this point. 15-18 seems a little high, but 10-12 in limited minutes does seem possible.
I believe he has the potential to a Jason Kapono type player…. he is also 6’8 I believe but slightly heavier…. a non-rebounding “stiff” on defense type of player who can light it up in the appropriate situation (i.e. Heat) on the offensive side… the Raps are not using him effectively in that situation right now, but AM does have potential to be a decent offensive threat in this league… in the right system…

by 
































