Playing Time
Editor's Note: Ladies and Gentlemen, we have our first FanPost promoted to the front page! This is a great example of what the FanPosts should be used for. In other words, something longer than a paragraph or two. Nice job Fan from VT! - Jeff
"Rondo needs a bump in minutes!"
"Pruitt’s ready for a mini-leap!"
"TA is finally healthy!"
"The Big Three still need there minutes!"
"House can play some 1 and some 2 but he needs to play!"
"Walker was a draft steal, coaches won’t be able to keep him off the floor!"
"O’bryant’s actually got some skills, he just needs some time!"
How many times have you witnessed or even uttered any of the above statements? All such ideas sound great in the offseason or taken in a vacuum, but what will happen once the season starts? And sure, we’d love to give Rondo, House, Pruitt, TA, and Walker all minutes, but someone has to play center, and someone has to sit. How will it shake out? I played around and wrote out one prediction for a possible division of minutes for the season laid out by position on the floor. Obviously, game to game circumstances would change some things. Some notes follow below. This is barring injury, of course.
| Name |
PG | SG | SF |
PF |
C |
Total |
| Rondo | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 |
| Ray | 0 | 26 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 36 |
| Pierce | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 36 |
| Garnett | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 8 | 36 |
| Perkins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 26 |
| Tony | 0 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| House | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Pruitt | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Powe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Davis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| O'bryant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Walker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Giddens | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cassell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Scal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 240 |
Perk-His minutes have gone from 19 to 21 to 24, no reason to expect more of a bump than that, but I’d love it if he could get up to 30 without foul trouble.
Ray-Minutes down by 2 per game. He’s probably going to continue to slip a bit, let’s keep him a little fresher. Slides to the 3 when Pierce sits.
House-Splits time at Point and Shooting guard.
TA-Only have him playing 2 of his 20 minutes at SF. I hope he gets this much time and thrives in his role this year now that he’s healthy.
Powe-He needs more time. He’s incredibly effective when he’s in. I’d like to see him at the 4 for all of Garnett’s “Center” minutes, so that on offense Powe can do his work down low and KG can help cover his rear on D.
O’bryant-I Hope he earns this. I see his potential talents (size, shotblocking) as more important than Davis’s contributions, which are similar to Powe’s, but Powe is simply much more productive than Davis
Davis-Maybe he’ll be dealt in a 2 for 1 to help the minutes crunch at the 4 and the potential minutes questions at the 3, 5, and 1.
Rondo-Decent minutes jump, let’s hope he earns it.
Pruitt-Can’t see him earning much more than this, not yet. I hope he proves me wrong. May get some D-League time as well. Speaking of…
Walker/Giddens-Primarily in the D-League this year.
Cassell/Scal-Don’t see them suiting up regularly
Thoughts?
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think Perk is the player to take the big jump in minutes
I think Posey pulled his minutes down alot with the small ball. I don’t see the SF that can play PF this year. And I do not see a big man on the bench that is better to steal 4th quarter minutes.
28-32 minutes a game.
There are only so many minutes to go around
Nice, well thought out post. I enjoyed the quotes that I have heard many times. Too often, fans’ notions of “who should play” are based solely on their affection for a certain player/s without any regard to how many actual player minutes are available each game. Your division makes clear, not everyone can play, no matter their skill level, real or perceived.
I think it is clear that TA, House, Powe and Davis are the top 4 off the bench at this point, with Pruitt and O’Bryant receiving minutes against certain teams or matchups or when there is foul trouble. Otherwise, there are simply no minutes left for anyone else, no matter how good they looked or people like them. We heard many of the same sentiments last year in all the pining for another big and backup point, with no regard to whose minutes would they take.
My personal feeling is that the culture of “the kids” contributed to this and being a Celtic fan during that time was mostly about projecting who would emerge rather than W’s, now it is completely different. I am sure everyone prefers the winning better in the long run, but I think it stymied the constant speculation that existed when there really was nothing else to root for, robbing some of what they enjoyed most.
One more note, even after winning it all, I still see plenty of thinly veiled shots taken at Doc for “not having a rotation” when in fact, he has more tools at his disposal that can work differently against different opponents over the course of 82 games. The holy rotation of say, 8 players, that many seem to crave, is more a symptom of not having anybody else worthy of seeing the court 9-12.
Doc has a deeper roster and uses it well, yet somehow it is still referred to critically as if he is just randomly trying anyone and everyone mindlessly. Funny how when Belichick uses different formations and different lineups depending on the opponent rather than a fixed game plan with the same personnel every game, he is lauded as a genius, but Doc is seen as unstable and unsure of himself.
well thought out
I think in some games O’Bryant will get more minutes and others Baby will get more – might depend on matchups
Thanks
for the thoughts guys. I would love to see Perk earn more minutes. And I agree, it may look nothing like this, and matchups will dictate a lot, as will injuries and foul trouble.
Set rotation
KJ33-
I also agree with what you said about set rotations. It’s easy to set a rotation of starters and 4 off the bench when it’s easy to rank your roster 1-9. With the Celtics, however, it’s more of a set starting 5 then really a lot of players who do some things well and others not so much, so a lot depends on the situation.
Woo hoo!
A fanpost like fanposts are intended to be!
Nice job, Fan from VT.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
more minutes for Pruitt
I think Pruitt will get more than 4 minutes a game. Even assuming no injuries to Rondo all season, Pruitt should see closer to 6 -8 minutes a game. If Rondo turns an ankle or gets nicked here or there, Pruitt should start in his place, and will get major minutes. Chances are that Rondo won’t play the full 82, he just does not have the body to handle it.
I think the Big 3’s minutes will be slightly less than you are projecting, at least I hope that they are. We need them to be strong and fresh for the play-offs, and to develop as deep a bench as possible during the regular season.
Assuming no injuries
Assuming no injuries, who do you take minutes from to give to Pruitt if you do not agree with the above table?
I think Pruitt may average more due to blowouts and DNPs, since DNPs do not lower your MPG. But it makes more sense to consider this assuming that a DNP counts as 1 game with 0 minutes if we want to equal 48 minutes per position.
by guava_wrench on Oct 27, 2008 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions
walker minutes
A decrease in garnett and pierce minutes (especially when up by 12pts or more) finds Walker minutes
Tony and House
Wouldnt be surprised to see more of Tony at SF, with House logging time at SG. Those allow the C’s cn continue with the inside/out attack while Paul and Ray sit. That may mean more time for Gabe at point. Most everything else seems about right. Dont see an increase for Perk (fouls). Powe/Davis will depend on effectivenss. Walker and POB look to be men in waiting.
KG: 32.8 last year
Garnett played a shade under 33 mpg last year. I imagine that’s about what he’ll play again, perhaps with Pierce and Allen getting closer to that, too— say, 35 for Pierce and 34 for Allen. That’d be 6 extra minutes per game, which I could see going to Pruitt and O’Bryant and maybe Walker.
The wild card for me is Big Baby: he was pretty inconsistent last year. Is he in that first group of subs (with TA, House, and Powe), or is he battling for minutes like the other guys (O’Bryant, Pruitt, etc). I suspect it could be the latter.
Giddens and perhaps Walker will go to the D-league. Posey’s minutes will go to Powe, Tony Allen and House. BBD should also get more minutes based on his play during the preseaon plus the need to protect Garnett’s legs and Perkins’ shoulder. I also expect Pruitt to get 10-15 mpg, and if he keeps improving, that number will go up.
Too many Zeros
So you anticipate that 4 people or 25% of the roster will earn 0 minutes all season long? I think that’s unrealistic for the following reasons.
1. Injuries. The Big 3 and our other starters will not be healthy all year long. In fact since each of the big 3 is 30 years or older, I anticipate that their minutes will be lowered to promote their longevity and health.
2. Bad developmental plan. If the Celtics follow this plan, none of their youngsters will get development. And sending youngsters to the NBDL is of limited use and will be of limited duration. Although I don’t like Scalabrine, I don’t think he’ll get 0 minutes either.
3. Oversimplifcation. Although the quotes you cited may often have been heard, that doesn’t mean that they don’t have merit. And you’ll never know what you have until they gain some experience in games. Do you think Rondo would have been any use in the playoffs if he hadn’t gotten minutes and seasoning previously? It’s not as cut and dry as your minutes chart would suggest. Following that kind of gameplan for distributing minutes is too simple and doesn’t take into account many factors, some of which I mentioned above but a big one that you ignore is the value of playing the youngsters during garbage time to both give them experience and to avoid meaningless injuries to the starters.
Responses
I think the original post was pretty clear that it was assuming no injuries.
The post was also pretty clear about the problem with all of those quotes. To give minutes to Paul, you have to take from Peter.
The main problem with the idea of doing a minutes chart is that is depends upon how competitive the game is. A close game against the Cavs or the Pistons may mean major minutes for the big 3. A blowout against the Nets may mean a minutes bonanza for the end of the bench and no forth quarter for the starters.
Nevertheless, the chart made it’s point.
by guava_wrench on Oct 27, 2008 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions
allen and allen
great post fan from vt.
the 2 and the 3 are going to be occupied primarily by pp, ra, and ta. so ta will be at the 2 whenever pierce is out, and at the 3 whenever ray is out. so I would bump ta’s minutes at the 3, reduce his minutes at the 2, and adjust ray’s minutes as well, keeping their totals as you have them. of course this doesn’t have a huge affect on your lineups, i’m just caviling.
it would be hard for doc to go wrong following this schedule.
My Expectations
I think Doc will go with four regulars off the bench – Eddie House, Tony Allen, Leon Powe and Glen Davis. I expect that to be the 9 man rotation.
Then on a game-by-game basis …. Walker to be called upon when the team needs more size at small forward.
I expect Scalabrine to be called upon when injuries happen, as a starter or bench replacement but hardly ever without injuries. I don’t expect O’Bryant to play. I thought Giddens would be the second choice wing behind Tony Allen before the season but it appears Walker is ahead of him for now. I don’t expect Cassell to play either.
If Pruitt continues his fine play in practices and whatever opportunities he ends up getting, then he could work himself into that Bill Walker area. Not quite in the regular rotation but just behind. If he continues to succeed from there then he may crack the rotation. To start the season I expect Doc to give Pruitt a few opportunities ahead of Sam Cassell but I think Pruitt will need to be excellent to stop turning back to Sam as the season goes on.
Gabe
Pruitt really impressed me in pre season play. With him in the game it lets Eddie House roam for those open shots especially with what Pruitt has shown as a scorer. He also showed himself to be very good defender. I think he’ll be used alot this year and will be part of the regular rotation. I don’t see Giddens or Walker as part of the first 12, but they seem to have a future here, possibly more Giddens than Walker (because of Leon and BBD). Scals or O’Bryant will be the third man out, possibly depending on matchups (opponents 2nd team Center height). Against some teams I can see a second team of House, TA, Pruitt, BBD and Leon blowing people away despite the lack of height.
PF position and Big 3 minutes
The Big 3 averaged 102 minutes last season. I’d expect those to fall to something around 96 minutes this season, not to go up to 106 minutes.
I also expect that Doc will be forced to play Pierce or Scalabrine at the PF position for some sizeable minutes. I hope he doesn’t need to do that, but it’s a possibility.
i hope we can limit KG’s minutes in the middle even more.
i expect at least 26 from perk but i hope to get 30 out of him most nights.
i seriously hope Paddy O works his way into 10 -15 minutes of playing time. if he does then that leaves 8 or less minutes for KG, Powe and BBD at the center spot.
looks like BBD is going to start the season ahead of Paddy O on the depth chart, but i bet he is being showcased.
Important rotation change
I hope that Gino gets a minute of PT for each home game.
end of bench minutes
Only thing I would say about rotations, is that the end of bench guys(ie.,pruitt,POB,walker), still need minutes EVERY game! Even 3-4 minute stints are fine, but they MUST be one at a time mixed in with all but one of the starters!
We all saw the big difference between POB with the starters and POB with others from the bench. Big difference! Those kind of guys play with more confidence and don’t feel they have to do so much when put in a better situation, and therefore, usually cuts down their mistakes.
Later in the season when you need one of them to step up, they haven’t been riding the pine all season and get thrust into a situation that they’re totally unprepared for.

by 






















