Pierce Belongs With The Greatest
I was going to write an article about this when I had a little time, but it seems like Shaughnessy beat me to it. From the Globe:
So now he's in the discussion. Best Celtics Starting Five of All Time. Top Celtics team of all time. It's a popular parlor game whenever two or more Celtics fans gather around a table of green beer. The estimable Bob Ryan (wish he wasn't so shy on TV) remembers conducting a Globe reader poll on the subject in 1973 when Larry Siegfried was part of the discussion.
Sorry, Siggy, you're out of the mix. But Pierce is now trying out for a spot on the All-Time Celtics starting five - which is akin to joining Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio, and Mickey Mantle in Yankee lore.
Russell, Bird, Havlicek, and Cousy always get the nod. And please don't go all
Comcast on us and try to bump Cooz from the starting five just because he was only 6 feet 1 inch and retired in 1963. Cousy was the face of the NBA for 13 seasons. He was Mr. Basketball. He's still the franchise's all-time assist king and he's top five in points, games, and minutes. Cooz never made a three, but that shouldn't work against him.Pierce could be the fifth starter on this team - unless you'd rather go with Kevin McHale and move Havlicek to the backcourt.
McHale is one of the most interesting names in this argument. He's among the most underrated players in NBA history. Given his unique skills, there are some who would put McHale on a list of the top 12 players in NBA history, but that's a discussion for another day. For today, we'll let you choose between Pierce and McHale as the starter on the Celtics Dream Team.
0 recs |
25 comments
|
Comments
fun debate
I wish we had thought of this in the offseason when we could have given it a little more thought
by Jeff Clark on Oct 31, 2008 8:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And the winner is....
…I still can’t decide. When it is all said and done Paul Pierce will probably be top 5 in about 10 different career statistical categories for the Celtics. But Kevin McHale was the second best defensive player to ever where green and also shortened his career and stats significantly by sacrificing his foot for the rest of his career in pursuit of number 17 in 1987. That has to count for something.
I’ll go with Kevin for right now because that team could use a power forward and because he has more rings but in another year or two I think I’ll be choosing Pierce.
by nickagneta on Oct 31, 2008 8:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
McHale over Pierce. And I don’t see how you can leave Sam Jones out of the coversation at the shooting guard spot.
I really think you need to divide the teams into two eras: pre-1980 and post 1980.
Pre-1980: Cousy, Sam Jones, Havlicek, Cowens (or Heinsohn), Russell
Post-1980: Parish, Bird, McHale, Pierce, DJ. And if they win a few more titles with KG, I could see moving McHale to Center and replacing Parish with Garnett.
by Brickowski on Oct 31, 2008 8:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is Pierce.
Yes McHale was the best low post scorer of all time (until that Tim Duncan guy), a great defender, good rebounder, and a warrior. But there is one very important distinction:
Pierce has always come out every night of his career like a franchise player, McHale did not. Yes, it was never McHale’s team, it was Bird’s. We will never know what McHale would have been like as a #1 guy. But we have seen Pierce in both capacities. Last year, even with the additions of KG and Ray, this was still Pierce’s team from a leadership perspective, especially in the playoffs.
Simmons has made the point before that the talent was undeniable with McHale, it was the night to night performance (sometimes comparing it to Manny). I do not completely agree with the Manny comparison, but there is a point. You did not always know what you would get, which is part of the reason he came off the bench for his first five seasons. Pierce would never have come off the bench, and probably never will have to. He takes it upon himself to perform like a franchise player every night and lead that way.
It is what separates #1 guys from #2 guys and I think it is what separates Pierce from McHale.
by avi623 on Oct 31, 2008 9:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There are a lot of players that should be considered, but McHale was unstoppable on the post, and probably had the most moves of anyone ever to play the low post.
A second team would possibly be Cowens, Heinsohn, Pierce, Sam Jones, and Jo Jo.
by amenhotep04 on Oct 31, 2008 9:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
McHale or Pierce
Hmmm.
Let’s see here.
McHale is widely considered the greatest power forward in the history of the game. Even those that don’t agree on that point, many do agree that he revolutionized the position. Regardless, he was one of the most potent and unstoppable low-post scorers in the history of the sport. In fact, if your name wasn’t Mychal Thompson, you couldn’t stop him. Let me put it another way, he was double teamed by Hakeem and Ralph in the 1986 finals, but to no avail.
Then you throw in that he was one of the best defensive players at his position, and the f act that he could effectively guard everyone from Hakeem to Kareem to Mailman to Dominique.
McHale is one of the 15 best players of all time, perhaps a top TENer.
Paul Pierce?
Give me a freakin’ break.
by William_Ayers on Oct 31, 2008 9:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I love this voting feature
instant feedback – very cool
by Jeff Clark on Oct 31, 2008 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
personally, I'm torn
I watched McHale during his prime and I may have enjoyed watching him as much as I did Bird – it was just abuse what he did to defenders
then again, Pierce may just be what Tommy called him, the best offensive player the C’s have ever had
I love them both, how can I decide?
(I voted for Paul, but that may have been out of the recency of his accomplishments)
by Jeff Clark on Oct 31, 2008 9:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Would have to go with Cowens, actually
I’d actually go with Cowens at the 4, moving Havlicek to the 2 and both McHale and Pierce to the bench. Here’s my all-time 12 man roster:
Starters / Reserves
Bob Cousy - PG – Jo Jo White – Dennis Johnson
John Havlicek – SG – Sam Jones
Larry Bird – SF – Paul Pierce – Tom Heinsohn
Dave Cowens – PF – Kevin McHale
Bill Russell – C – Robert Parish
by Ben Pepper on Oct 31, 2008 10:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
McHale
I’ve never seen anyone else with such a versatible offensive arsenal in the low post. He could do everything, including some moves that probably were never replicated. I may be biased here, because McHale is, stylistically, my favourite basketball player ever, but being Pierce a great player, it doesn’t come close.
by cordobes on Oct 31, 2008 10:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
McHale or Cowens?
I would go for Dave Cowens. McHale was noted for his ability to cover 3’s, but Cowens was an outstanding and versatile defender too, and a better athlete. He wasn’t the low post scorer McHale was, but he was a good post player and an excellent midrange shooter. He was a much better rebounder than McHale. Most importantly, he was an intense competitor, and a smarter player. The idea of having Russell, Bird and Cowens out there gives you a frightening overall intensity. The rebounding would be incredible.
by td450 on Oct 31, 2008 10:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If the plan is to put together an actual starting lineup...
You need McHale at the 4. Bird at PF, next to an undersized (but still dominant) C in Bill Russell just wouldn’t work as well. With Russell at the 5 and McHale at 4, that team shuts people down, even with Cousy as a weak defender at PG.
I think the real question is, Hondo vs. Pierce. On that one, I have to take Havlicek, although Pierce has shrunk that gap a lot more than I ever expected he would.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 31, 2008 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also...
In terms of offensive versatility, a team with McHale makes us unstoppable in the post, as McHale probably had the second best post moves in NBA history (behind Hakeem, arguably).
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 31, 2008 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
matchups
if you go the route of “if we fielded an actual team” then I guess it would depend on matchups
I think I was thinking along the lines of “who gets the honor based on their careers?”
by Jeff Clark on Oct 31, 2008 10:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
who gets the honor based on their careers?
Again, Cowens over McHale. One less ring, but he worked so much harder than McHale. Won an MVP.
by td450 on Oct 31, 2008 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm...
First, I think McHale is probably a better option at PF regardless of matchup, because the guy could literally defend everyone from quick 3s to power 5s.
However, if we’re going with which player has the better Celtic credentials, I’m still saying McHale. Pierce, for all his greatness, was also on some of the very worst teams in franchise history, and has won fewer championships than McHale (or Cowens). I think here, winning has to trump stats.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 31, 2008 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
cooz
“Cooz never made a three, but that shouldn’t work against him”.
That’s because the three point shot came into the NBA in the late 70s ot early 80s…Chris Ford got the first three in NBA history
HARDLYYARDLEY
by hardlyyardley on Oct 31, 2008 12:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reyquila
You need a PF to go with the other four guys already chosen and that guy would have to be Kevin- no doubt about it.
by Reyquila on Oct 31, 2008 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hondo or Pierce
Hobbs makes a good point [only good because it boslters mine :)].
McHale is one of the greatest 4s in the history of hoops, maybe THE greatest.
How could he not start on the Celtics all-time team?
The real question is, like Hobbs said, Hondo v. Pierce.
Until Pierce wins another championship, there is no choice again…
Hondo
by William_Ayers on Oct 31, 2008 1:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hondo vs pierce
“The real question is, like Hobbs said, Hondo v. Pierce”.
Sort of like Ted Williams to Yaz
HARDLYYARDLEY
by hardlyyardley on Oct 31, 2008 1:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
if its just mcchale vs. pierce
then it HAS to be mcchale. not only was he unstoppable in the post, he was one of the greatest defensive 4s. if pierce plays D the rest of his career like he did in the playoffs last year, and still keeps up his offense, that’s what mcchale was like his whole career. its not a knock on pierce, who will probably be a 1st ballot HOFer now. mcchale was just that good.
by guy incognito on Oct 31, 2008 2:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What about McHale v Garnett?
Imagine a KG for McHale trade 08 for 86.
Which team would do better, which worse?
by GreenBalls on Oct 31, 2008 2:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
interesting
I think each team worked with the players they had in part due to the spacing
the 08 team benefited from KG’s midrange game (opening lanes) while the 86 team benefited from McHale’s post play (open looks for Bird on the perimeter)
by Jeff Clark on Oct 31, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the only problem is that you have 1 big there. but i guess we could just run all day.
by xmuscular ghandix on Oct 31, 2008 4:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anyone who’s seen both Mchale and Pierce play has to know Mchale is the better player. Mchale was unstoppable in the post, even under doubleteams. Always took the toughest forward to defend leaving Bird the easier player and thereby the passing lanes to play.
Pierce is a tremendous player and I’m glad we have him but he’s not better than Mchale.
by slamtheking on Nov 2, 2008 12:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs





















