Fickle Pine Play
At 20 wins and 2 losses, finding nits to pick is like finding needles in a haystack. And there's only so much you can say without sounding overly critical and irrational. However, no team is perfect and not all wins are created equal. Sure, every win counts the same in the box scores, but sometimes a W will obscure a deficiency (just like losses sometimes obscure good play).
So what is there to worry about on this team? You could point to Rondo's jumper, but it is hard to criticize someone that is getting more and more All Star buzz. You could pick on Kendrick's inconsistent offense, but suffice it to say that if he averages 5 points a game but defends the post up to his usual standard, nobody will be complaining one bit. Oh yeah, and despite Paul's recent downturn in point production, nobody is really worried much about the Big Three.
So that leaves the bench. Here's what Doc had to say about the bench after reviewing some film:
“Our bench has to improve,” Rivers said. “It’s got to be more consistent. They have a good quarter here and there. But we need to get them to be consistent game to game. They’ve been up and down.
“They’re young, it’s a young bench, and maybe that’s what we have to expect for a while. But we need them to be better.”
Rivers went with an all-reserve unit — with some great success — at the start of the winning streak three week ago, but he has gone back to keeping either Pierce or Allen out with the bench corps in most cases.
“I think our focus has to be more defensively,” Pierce said of those circumstances. “I think that’s where we’ve struggled. When the starting unit comes out, we really have to emphasize our defense and getting back.”
He's got the right idea (he's a bright guy after all, and knows a little bit about basketball). The bread and butter of this team is defense. When guys fall in love with their offense, they might expend less energy and focus on the other end of the court.
You can always expect some inconsistency from any bench. After all, if the players were consistently great, they probably would be starting somewhere (there are notable exceptions of course). On the other hand, to consider this a great team, we need the non-starters to have clearly defined roles and make sure they focus on those roles.
Tony Allen should not be trying to emulate what Pierce or Ray Allen do. He should be driving to the hoop and pestering the opponents wing players. Big Baby can work on his midrange shot, but not at the distraction of the rest of the offense.
Most of all, like Doc said, they should be focused on getting stops. If the 2nd unit (with or without a starter plugged in) can hold the other team to just a few points over a 5 - 10 minute stand, it won't matter if they don't score much themselves. They will have put the starters in position to do what they do to win ballgames. If they can do that, we'll be much less concerned about the bench as we head down the stretch.
I'm still holding out hope that the team will find a big man to pick up. They already have Sam Cassell on lay-away in case they need a veteran in the backcourt. Scal isn't great, but he doesn't often make mistakes that cost you a game (and there's always the option to call up Bill Walker for some youthful energy). I think Leon is set in the rotation, but we could use an upgrade over Big Baby at the center spot (and clearly the Notorious P.O.B. isn't earning any additional time).
Everyone would love to see PJ Brown show up for round 2, but there are any number of ways someone could shake loose from a current NBA roster.
I'll be closely watching what the Thunder do at the trade deadline. Not because I anticipate them making any grand moves. I just don't see how Joe Smith fits into their long term plans. If he's not dealt by the deadline, they might just cut him loose to save a few bucks on his expiring contract. Or sometimes a player (like McDyess) is traded to make salaries match and doesn't fit into the new team's plans and is bought out.
Bottom line, I think the plan is to find a veteran big by the end of the year to help this team down the stretch. Until then, however, the bench needs to follow Doc's coaching and focus on defense and let the offense come naturally.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
There will be another veteran added before the playoffs begin, that I’m sure of. It might be PJ, it might be another big, it might be another power-3 type to back up PP. I think the plan was to use the early part of the season to see which of the young guys would really stick, who they could count on to be a part of the rotation once things tighten up in the playoffs. That’s why Cassell isn’t playing; give plenty of room for guys like TA to prove that they should be out there (and to develop their own confidence).
Powe’s proven he belongs. BBD – a bit more sporatic. Unless they’re convinced he can be a night-in, night-out defender, they’ll bring someone else in, but for now they’re seeing what he can do.
They gave POB a chance, and he failed. Wouldn’t be shocked to see him get cut if/when they make a move.
But basically, use the first half of the season to see what these younger guys really have, and if there are still holes plug them up post-All Star break, just like last year.
by theBird on Dec 11, 2008 10:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Bench
Some teams, like the Pacer’s the other nite, are rotating their players so they have starters against our bench. I don’t think that’s the cause of the bench’s recent problems. They really haven’t had practice time as a unit, especially defensively. We’ll see if these days off make a difference. As to BBD taking that outside shot, he’s almost always open to take it. It seems to be done within the offense. The bench has shown it can play well as a unit without a starter. I don’t see this as a long-term problem. I agree I would like to see us get a big to backup Perk against certain opponent bigs. Powe and BBD seem to get the job done most of the time. They were great against Yao.
by TrueGreen on Dec 11, 2008 11:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i do think danny will do something and we all hope he can pull a rabbit out of the hat. it seems baby is our most likely trade bait because he has a lot of value. scal doesn’tt lose us games but he is so limited . pob has big deficiencies but has had little real experience to help him get better. talk about someone who needed to stay in college.
by nazzbo on Dec 11, 2008 11:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I've only two things to say
Posey, Brown.
by The Real Large James 2 on Dec 11, 2008 12:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
PJ Brown played a total of 18 games last regular season with the celtics and averaged 2 pts on 34% shooting and 3 rebounds a game…I think its safe to say we dont miss him at all right now.
by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 11, 2008 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff Clutch Performance
This is where Tony Allen will NEVER be James Posey.
This is why we got Sam Cassell.
This is why we got PJ, and we needed him.
This is why we need another reliable big before April.
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on Dec 11, 2008 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not sure we’re missing Posey as much right now as we worried we might. Tony Allen (who I still don’t trust) has nonetheless been better than expected, and if he’s playing with confidence he brings elements that even Big Game James can’t match. PJ, though, was huge for us in the playoffs. I just don’t dare go into the playoffs with a couple of 6’7" guys as our only decent backup big men. There’s just too much of a height mismatch against Big Z and Pau/Bynum; they’ve done OK in the past, but that’ still an Achilles’ Heal for us.
by theBird on Dec 11, 2008 12:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is all coachspeak. As someone showed the other day, there is little or no statistical difference between the defense being played by the 2nd unit this year vs last year.
by Brickowski on Dec 11, 2008 12:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
stats can be decieving
I’m too lazy to look up the particulars, but the bench has seemed up and down this year – which could average out to match up to a more even-keeled season
not saying I know this is true about this year and last year, just a theory
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on Dec 11, 2008 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
when has doc
ever said “its the offense” – frankly better offense helps the defense, by preventing fast breaks and half court sets against an unset D. Additionally Doc is up to his old tricks of playing 10 players regularly (House, Allen, Scal, Powe, BBD form a full second unit and all are seeing quasi regular minutes.) I think some of the problem is guys not knowing how to work together.
by Brendan on Dec 11, 2008 12:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Right, except you must play defense at all times, not just when you can get “better offense”, so this point is moot.
by kozlodoev on Dec 11, 2008 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rondo is the man
From the Globe Link:
“If I don’t make it, it’s not a big deal,” Rondo said. "My goal is to be on the All-Defensive team and win a championship.
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on Dec 11, 2008 2:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your premise, that the key for the reserves must be to play defense. Tomorrow’s game should tell us something about where the Celts are at this point…
by nba is the worst on Dec 11, 2008 6:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

























