Another Reminder of How Good It Is To Be Green
A Daily Babble Production
A fourteenth straight victory. Just 82 points allowed to a team that scores nearly 98 per game and is fourth in basketball in offensive efficiency. A stifling 35.4 percent shooting allowed from the field. A double-digit victory.
Yet throughout last night's 94-82 Celts victory over the Hornets at the TD Banknorth Garden, it felt as though the green's defense left plenty to be desired.
Despite all of the good parts of the defensive performance mentioned above, what stuck out to me all of Friday night was what appeared to be going on under the Hornets' basket throughout the contest: People in teal shirts receiving the ball and putting it in the hoop with no white jerseys in sight. By my count, the Hornets had no less than 18 dunks and lay-ups last night. The vast majority of those came either on the fast break or completely uncontested off of a pass from the perimeter to a player standing alone on the block. David West and Hilton Armstrong each had driving dunks in traffic, but beyond that it seemed that Hornets were camping out under the basket and letting Celtics drift away from them.
On a similar note, when the Celtics were nearby, it seemed that their overly physical brand of defense caused them a bit more trouble than usual. Despite the fact that the Hornets are just 25th in the league at getting to the line at 22.7 free throw attempts per game, the Celtics sent New Orleans to the charity stripe 33 times. That the Hornets only converted on 24 occasions (72.7 percent) was an abnormal fortune for the Celts as New Orleans sits third in the league as a team at 81.5 percent shooting from the line.
But when all is said and done, it is this sort of reaction to last night's defensive performance that demonstrates just how far this team has come and, as a result, how much the attitude of its fans has been able to change. Because the defense our Celtics play these days is really that good. They swarm the basketball. They crash the glass. They don't give up 13 offensive rebounds or 30-plus free throw attempts in a game or easy buckets by the boatload these days, and we don't expect them to do so.
They went up last night against the best point guard this league has to offer, and they held Chris Paul to a miserable 5-of-16 shooting performance from the field. It is a testament to what a wonderful creator CP3 is that he still managed to leave Celtics fans such as yours truly as frustrated as I was at times last night. It was largely because of his presence and what a threat he is to get in the lane and wreak havoc that the Celtics kept coming away from Hornets around the basket. There isn't much anyone in this league is doing about the type of play Paul made late in the third quarter. That would be when he brought the ball up the floor just offset to the right side of the top of the three-point line, looked hard to his right and then without shifting his glance whipped a laser to a wide-open Devin Brown on the left block for a lay-in. Paul made plays like that all night, freeing the likes of Brown, Melvin Ely, Sean Marks and Hilton Armstrong for easy looks while also putting in a couple of fast-break lay-ups and getting himself to the stripe 10 times.
Most teams and their fans in this league would be thrilled to be able to offset a 20-point, 14-assist game for Chris Paul by holding his squad below 40 percent field-goal shooting and inside of 85 points for the night. Two seasons ago, I would have taken any performance like that in a heartbeat with no questions asked. Last night, even as the Celtics did all those things and held Peja Stojakovic to 1-of-6 shooting to boot, I found myself thinking, "This is good, but I know our boys can play better at this end of the floor."
Don't get me wrong: It wasn't the angry reaction of a spoiled child who has had everything his way for too long (really, it has only been a year and change in this analogy). As I've written with regularity over the past 15 months and will likely be doing so again soon, I'm having too much fun with this team to ever really get mad about any of it. I'm too grateful for the chance to watch this team and fall in love with it all over again every night to let expectations get too high that I can't enjoy it.
This shouldn't for a second come off as though it was anything but a pleasure to watch last night's victory over the Hornets, to watch Paul Pierce take over in the second half, to see Eddie House drain a couple more treys, to see more signs of Kendrick Perkins' continued growth as a player. But on a night shown by many statistical indicators to be a great defensive performance - one most teams would take any night - there came a wonderful realization after the fact that, yes, this team has become that dominant on defense that it is reasonable to expect more. Because these fellas in green have shown that, more often than not, they can and will meet those expectations.
1 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
easy layups
Nice writeup, as usual Steve.
Your point in the first paragraph about the easy layups and dunks: here’s my two cents on it…
This is why I think CP3 is overrated. Yes, he’s a very talented player, and he posts stellar numbers consistently. But against a great team like the Celtics it was to no avail.
His tendency to dribble 15-20 seconds off the shot clock every possession garners to much attention due to his ability to penetrate and finish, that every now and then someone gets a very, very easy finish under the basket. It happens. But when the rest of the team gets a total of three assists that he didn’t create, well, that’s the sign of a stagnant offense.
You go on to make that point in a later paragraph: “he makes plays like that all night” – no, he makes plays like that EVERY night, which is why his stats are so inflated.
Call me crazy, a homer, and the like, but. I would much rather have Rondo on my team as a point guard than CP3. I think this coronation of CP3 as the next Magic are absurd. I would even go on to say that the Celtics would not be as good a team with CP3 in Rondo’s place. I mean that. Apparently Jerry Sloan feels the same way – he felt that DWill would be better for his system (and I agree).
I wish that shots that Rondo creates but does not get credited for an assist would show up statistically (Rondo drives and dishes, extra pass, bucket, for example). I also think Rondo is a much better defender, that the only edge CP3 has is consistency in the mental aspect.
Rondo did not have a particularly good game last night, which doesn’t help my point, but it’s a pet peeve of mine. As you know I’m rather convicted of my opinions, and I really hate the love fest for guys who are seemingly undeserving in my book relative to the legends they are compared to (CP3, Wade, LeBrick).
/rant
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on Dec 13, 2008 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Brick, sadly, your wish is my command on this one...
…so I’m going to go ahead and call you crazy :-D
I love Raj as much as the next guy around here, and his several breakout performances over the last month have been a pleasure to watch. But there isn’t a point guard in the league I’d rather have on my squad than CP3.
Not only is he talented and a poster of stellar numbers, as you say, but he has used that talent to make his team better as a unit. The Hornets did not play great offensive basketball last night, partly because they missed their share of open shots and partly because they played against the best defensive team in basketball. But a season ago, they were fifth in offensive efficiency. This year, they rank fourth. That hardly has the sound of an stagnant offense to me. Your argument might be easier for me to buy if it was only Paul’s numbers being ‘inflated’ – but again, there has been team success to back that up – not to mention the fact that this team won a franchise-record 56 games a year ago.
Paul is a beautiful passer and a tremendous finisher in the lane as well as an extraordinarily efficient scorer (57.6 percent true shooting last year; 62.9 this season). He does both of those things better than Rondo does, and while his perimeter shooting isn’t his strong suit, he is certainly better than Rondo in that area as well. While Rondo may be the better defender, it bears noting that CP3 is no slouch there either, as he demonstrated last night and last season – when he was a second-team All-Defense selection.
The Williams-Paul debate seems a whole lot fairer than the Rondo-Paul debate at this point. For now though, Paul remains the top point guard in the league in my book and one of the league’s top few players. I’d take him on my team any day.
Again, that’s no disrespect to Rondo, who I love – but I’m not going to claim that our players are better than the best at their positions in this league simply because they wear the green.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Dec 13, 2008 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
but I’ve been saying Rondo is going to be the best PG in the league since his rookie season, not just because he wears green. I never said any such thing about Banks, Delonte, etc. but I really think Rondo has what it takes.
Yes, CP3’s a great player as I said, but I think his worth is far exaggerated. Like Rondo, he was “put into a situation” that fits him well, and that’s a testament to whomever is the GM for the Hornets. I just don’t think too highly of point guards who have to dominate the ball to be effective (see Marbury, Stephon – he posted great numbers for a long long time, and look where he is now…) Not saying CP3 is a headcase like Starbury, just using that example to make a point.
I’ll take a defensive minded, old school PG any day over CP3.
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on Dec 13, 2008 6:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"CP3, Wade, LeBrick"
In other words, the three best players in the league so far this season. One of them will probably win the MVP, and he’ll deserve it.
by PJ Martinez on Dec 13, 2008 9:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And none of them will win a championship.
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on Dec 13, 2008 9:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully a true statement
but I’m not sure that makes any of the three players named overrated. I imagine if any of those players were inserted into the Celtics’ lineup at his respective position, he’d experience some decent team success as well.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Dec 13, 2008 9:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I will opt to call you crazy, as I think CP3 is far and away the best PG in the league, and he would make our squad better.
Reporter: About a year ago I asked about the Celtics-Lakers thing and you said you'd really only seen it on TV. Now you've been through it, can you talk about playing the Boston Celtics for the NBA championship?
Kobe: It Sucks.
by indeedproceed on Dec 13, 2008 5:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The other side of the coin
Hornets were 2-14 from the 3-point line. Excellent perimeter defense!
by nba is the worst on Dec 13, 2008 6:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
It feels good to be able to complain about minor issues. Especially when just a year and a few months I was despairing because we didn’t have anyone capable of slowing down the most clumsy pick and roll.
Anyway, I think there were some mis-executions but part of it was an assumed trade-off. We were over-playing more than usual on defense, trying to stop their dribble penetration and on-the-ball screens very early, so we were more vulnerable than usual to backdoor plays.
by cordobes on Dec 13, 2008 7:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Real Paul, The Truth
There’s been much talk lately about OUR Paul being in a slump. He wasn’t in a slump last nite. When this team has it’s offense operating smoothly Pierce becomes more of a facilitator than scorer. Ray has been hot and his offense has been glowing lately. But, in the Hornet’s game the offense was out of synch all nite. These are the games where ONLY Paul Pierce (on this team) can imply his will on the outcome of a game. Paul has done it before in similar games this season and he did it last nite. Even though his outside shot wasn’t going down he found a way to score and to get the Hornets over the foul limit which gave us a chance to get more points if the refs decided to finally make a call in our favor.
by TrueGreen on Dec 13, 2008 7:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I agree with everything you say about this great team. But I would add something. I just read, possibly still in the rumor stage, that Maurice Cheeks was fired. To me that shows why some teams just can’t get to be good. All we need do is look at the way our management, especially Danny Ainge stuck with Doc during the “bad” times. Our management understood what was going on, that it wasn’t a coach problem, but a roster problem. Philly paid alot of money to get Elton Brand, a player that I admire and wouldn’t cry if he was on our team. Brand didn’t play all last year, so he’s not really game ready. The team doesn’t know how to best utilize him or create a style that will do so. Compare this to the Ray Allen situation last year. Ray was hurt and he wasn’t working well within Doc’s system. Instead of firing Doc, they let both Ray recuperate from his injury while still playing, but more importantly they figured out a way to get the best out of Ray in this system. The results didn’t show till the latter stages of the playoffs last year. It took TIME and our management gave both Doc, Ray and the TEAM the TIME to work things out. Philly has some good players and Cheeks is a good coach. The team and coach needed TIME and their management wouldn’t give it. It will cost them
by TrueGreen on Dec 13, 2008 7:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























