Records? We Don't Care About No Records
The media is starting to make a little bit of noise about breaking records and various milestones. As a psudo-member of the media, I understand why. It's an easy story angle and people get excited about records.
On the other hand, I feel like it is very premature to talk about the Celtics breaking the Bulls 72 win record. Yet, we already have an article by (admitted Boston hater) Bethlehem Shoals making the case that the Celtics just aren't that good yet. The way I read it, he's saying: "media and fans, take it easy with the whole 'best team ever' talk."
The thing is, I haven't seen anyone (media or fans) make that big a deal about this yet. The blogger doth protest too much methinks. I think everyone understands that it is way early in the season for that sort of talk. Too much can happen. Besides, the records are not even this team's goal.
Read Scott Souza's piece on the team's attitude about records.
The Celtics have this little game they play when it comes to records, winning streaks, and anything else that doesn’t specifically have to do with securing a championship.
They claim ignorance.
Ask them their record, and they’ll vow they don’t know. Tell them their record, then ask them again the next day, and they’ll swear again they haven’t a clue. Mention a winning streak, and the Charlestown Code of Silence kicks in.
They take pride in the lack of awareness of something they view as insignificant to their ultimate goal.
They need look no further than the Pats to learn a valuable lesson. Regular season records mean jack if you don't win the ring. They have one ring, now they want more. Or put another way: The only record that matters to the Celtics is 17 Banners and counting.
And that's how it should be.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
73-9
It is too early to talk about 73-9. In fact, I just don’t see it happening, almost under any circumstances. We were very fortunate to win a bunch of games last year in March and April when we played our bench.
We could have just as easily have lost several of those.
We went 25-5 against the West last year.
Will that happen again this year?
27-3?
No and no.
We should win in the low to mid sixties. Remember the others Celtics team to start 20-2 only won 59 games.
by Page_and_Plant on Dec 18, 2008 11:13 AM EST reply actions
Records in General
On the other hand, this team digs records.
It understands that’s part of making your mark in this league.
It’s one of the games they play to get up for games.
26-2 is the best start ever. Let’s go for 27-2.
I’m not buying we don’t care.
I’m just saying they do care, and they knock off the records that are within reach.
by Page_and_Plant on Dec 18, 2008 11:16 AM EST reply actions
They Just Like to Win
They just like to win
As noted elsewhere, this team isn’t gonna dominate for more than a few years. But they are gonna dominate while they can:
http://lexnihilnovi.blogspot.com/2008/12/winning-while-they-can.html
by Page_and_Plant on Dec 18, 2008 11:18 AM EST reply actions
Here's a Record I'd like to see somebody set.
I want to see one of the national broadcasters do an entire Celtics game (half-time included) without mentioning that darn winning streak. A day after they do it, they can then boast about their tremendous achievement and speak dismissively about any other broadcaster ever topping their record by doing two such games.
Maybe it’d help if during their half time shows, they would show a little banner hanging from their studio ceiling, immortalizing their monumental record.
Then, if they’re really serious, they can move on to setting records for not showing Glen Davis crying on the bench, or Garnett not banging his head against the padding on the basket goal stand while talking to himself.
This team
is going to need a key mid season signing. Our bench as currently constituted will not get us deep into the playoffs. Our starters will tire and Ray Allen playing 42 minutes is a killer. TAllen is no replacement for Posey and it’s really starting to show.
by The Real Large James 2 on Dec 18, 2008 11:44 AM EST reply actions
It's 2007 all over again.
Why would anyone that actually watches this team be concerned about whether they are concerned about records.
Tony Allen > Dearly departed JP
Bench
The bench could use an upgrade, and Atlanta could knock us off.
Having said that, the chances of us standing pat are 0%.
So the questions then are
Who?
and
When?
by Page_and_Plant on Dec 18, 2008 12:13 PM EST reply actions
Epic Fail
Not to re-sign PoZ, everything he brought to us last year he continues bringing to the hornets, except even more so.
Tony Allen is not a replacement for Posey, thats ridicoulous..our bench is terrible
by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 18, 2008 12:31 PM EST reply actions
Powe
Is he wildly inconsistent or what? both him and BBD seem so bad lately
by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 18, 2008 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Defending Bethlehem Shoals?
I actually think he’s got a point. Say the Celts do break or tie the record and win more than 72 games but lose in the playoffs, maybe to the Cavs or Lakers and don’t win another ring with the Big Three. They’d be a great team and I’d remember them for the rest of my life but they would not be in the same discussion as MJ’s Bulls.
Its like the Patriots from last year. I’ll remember that season forever and that team will always have the privilege of being put up in graphics as the only team to go undefeated in a 16 game regular season but I think they lost out on any chance of being the greatest team ever when they lost the Superbowl.
72-10
If the celtics did tie or break this record, it would just put more pressure on them in the playoffs, so I’m not even rooting for it to happen, at the end of day the winning the championship is all that matters
by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 18, 2008 12:55 PM EST reply actions
This is the most competitive team since the Bulls, and will win as many games as they can. Any records which may or may not fall along the way will not distract them from the goal of repeating as champions.
Obviously any serious injury to any of the starters will be catastrophic, and I agree they should have paid Posey, but that’s irrelevant now.
Another true big man as a backup is important, Mutombo seems like a worthwhile gamble .
by nba is the worst on Dec 18, 2008 7:11 PM EST up reply actions
The Patriots
lost the Super Bowl because Brady’s foot was hurt more than he let on and Richard Seymour was held for ten seconds on “The Pass” play and no flag was thrown. Go to youtube and watch if you don’t believe me. Like the Pats in the playoffs last year, if any of our starters go down, we will be very vulnerable. The Lakers have two former starters coming off the bench right now. Wake up folks, we should have signed Posey.
by The Real Large James 2 on Dec 18, 2008 1:03 PM EST reply actions
LOL
The Patriots were overrated? hahaha, thats one of the dumbest comments of all time…How so? there defense wasnt dominant, no.. but overrated? hahaha, that offense was among the greatest of all time, period..and you realize they beat the Giants to go 16-0, and Brady was in fact injured in the Superbowl?
Coming from a probable Browns fan, this is LAUGHABLE
by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 18, 2008 5:22 PM EST reply actions
too mean to lose
I was here, in Chicago for the 90’s bulls’ runs. This is what this team in doing. they are using the regular season as a long and intense practice session. they are mean and they are trying to prove their dominance every night, all while getting better. It is really fun to see that, of course, nobody in Chicago will even listen to this comparison, their loss, they are missing some great ball right now.

































