CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


spread the word

Bah, Humbug

Well, it was a very good game until Gasol put it away with some timely buckets down the stretch.  Hand it to the Lakers, they played a good game and won.  Now the questions will rise again:  Who is the better team?  Do the Celtics miss Posey?  Do Ariza and Bynum (and team defense) mean the Lakers are better this year?

Make no mistake.  This one hurts.  Any loss to the Lakers is worth 5 losses to the Bucks or Wizards in my heart.  Losing on Christmas is a lump of coal in my stocking that I could have done without.

With that said, we can still point to our banner.  This wasn't game 8 of the Finals.  That series is over and in the books.  They can never take that away from us.

Likewise, this game will have little to nothing to do with the outcome of the Finals this year (unless home court advantage comes down to one game).  The Celtics still get to host the Lakers in Boston later this year.  And it isn't how you start the year, it is how you finish it.

These are all things we have to tell ourselves to make us feel better.  These are things the Laker fans don't have to tell themselves today.  That stings.

The only silver lining: If you thought the Celtics were motivated before, wait till they let this loss sink in.  At least that's what I'll keep telling myself.

Star-divide

Starters Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  R. Allen G 42:17 5-14 3-11 1-2 -2 0 1 3 3 1 0 2 4 14 
  R. Rondo G 33:50 3-11 0-1 0-0 -3 1 3 12 2 1 0 3 5
  K. Perkins C 34:03 4-5 0-0 0-0 -1 2 7 0 2 0 2 1 3
  P. Pierce F 38:17 7-13 2-4 4-4 -6 2 10 3 5 1 0 1 4 20 
  K. Garnett F 37:14 11-14 0-1 0-0 -3 0 9 2 0 1 1 0 2 22 
 Bench Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  T. Allen 16:24 3-9 0-2 0-0 -11 1 2 0 3 1 0 2 3
  E. House 14:08 1-5 0-3 0-0 -7 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 1
  G. Davis 13:13 2-6 0-0 0-0 -6 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 2
  L. Powe 10:17 0-0 0-0 1-2 -6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1
  B. Scalabrine 0:13 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
 Totals 36-77 5-22 6-8 7 40 22 17 8 3 9 25 83 

0 recs | Comment 107 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from CelticsBlog

Comments

Display:

Well, Jeff, overall the Lakers certainly look deeper right now than we are.

by CoachBo on Dec 25, 2008 8:05 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah, about that bench

…it needs work

…and yes, I’ll say it, we do miss Posey right now, but he’s not walking through that door

…we need Mutumbo or Smith or someone else soon because O’Bryant is not going to work out

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Dec 25, 2008 8:09 PM EST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

What Jeff said

With the minor exception that I’m not as concerned about the “soon” part – because I don’t think the regular season record is the point of impact. I just want someone who will be both in shape and accustomed to the system by playoff time.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Dec 25, 2008 8:14 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We definitely miss Posey right now, for his ability to score off the bench, for his ability to stretch defenses and for his ability to shut people down for chunks of time. As I said in the summer, penny-wise and pound-foolish. The idea that we’ve replaced those contributions, in my opinion, grows out of a false security built on inferior opponents.

What’s done is done, however. We need length off the bench to solve the major matchup problems that the Lakers made clear today, and we need a scorer, preferably one who can defend a little bit without killing us on the offensive end with reckless careening to the basket.

I’ve said it before: We cannot repeat with the bench Danny put together this summer.

by CoachBo on Dec 25, 2008 11:26 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Spot on, CoachBo

Spot on, CoachBo, spot on. Surely Danny sees this too, and will address it.

Too often on Celts forums, if you point out that Posey’s contributions are nowhere near replaced by TA, et al, you get hounded by homers, but it’s true nonetheless.

Especially good point about being penny wise and pound foolish. PGA’s realistic window is maybe two more years (approximately the same as Posey’s). We will stink when they decline anyway. It should be all about maximizing these 2 or 3 years.

What’s done is done, as you said. I just hope he recognizes that TA cannot be trusted as our primary swing reserve. Sure, he’ll have some nice games, but let’s be frank… he’s not a very bright guy, and makes way too many boneheaded plays.

I’m hoping Danny comes through in addressing these issues. I expect him to. He knows all these things too.

by Mencius on Dec 26, 2008 10:58 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ah, not that topic again. Haven“t you heard that Bill Walker might make it on the NBDL all-second team?

:P

by Casperian on Dec 25, 2008 8:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Game

We lost to a greater team, hopefully we get deke and maybe starbury. Those players will bring us to the promise land.

by Champzilla on Dec 25, 2008 8:13 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Greater in this game, sure...greater overall?

At the absolute least, I think I might reserve judgment on that…

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Dec 25, 2008 8:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Depth is partly perception. A few games can change people’s opinion about “depth.” Last year when Powe was torching us, I thought you guys were deeper.

Our bench was better in this game, but your starting lineup seemed to be stronger. As a pure basketball fan, the two televised games made for some great basketball.

Happy Holidays to all.

by Snoopy2006 on Dec 25, 2008 8:14 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Back atcha, Snoopy

Your analysis sounds about right to me. Contrary to the experts’ claims, we were deeper last season. Right now, your squad is deeper – though I’m not sure it’s better. It was today (see: scoreboard), but even as currently constructed, I’m not sure that’s the case in the long haul. That much remains to be seen.

Best wishes for a happy and healthy holiday season.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Dec 25, 2008 8:17 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well as they say, denial aint just a river in Egypt

1. the big three played just fine, net. KG played very well.
2. perk and Rajon played well enough. There were many layups missed not just by the above. Did Bynum bug them some?
3. we need a bench member to play well to make up for posey being out for the year(funny, huh?:>()
it didn’t happen but imho each one of them had some decent moments
4. What did we lack?? here it comes: a longer big when both perk and kg were out; better defensive rotation at the three point line; and another good distant shooter. i am not hallucinating: that is exactly why we lost.

We can’t replace pose but we can pick up deke and have the big we need. can we win it without the d rotation at the three and another shooter? Yes i think we will be able to pull it out, barely. Tony and eddie will have to be steady.

by wahz on Dec 25, 2008 9:13 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rondo was terrible tonight

I guess different people see things differently…whouda thunkit?

God bless and good night!

by BrickJames on Dec 26, 2008 12:13 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

motivation

Didn’t see too much of that tonight. In fact, they’ve played against lesser teams more passionately than they did today. I think they were a little flat and they let the calls against them sap the enthusiasm they did have, save for the run in the third.

If the Celts indeed looked at this as just another game, I am not sure how much they’ll take from it in terms of motivation.

by Thruthelookingglass on Dec 25, 2008 8:17 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I dont think we need to talk about Posey

that was last years team, and I dont think we neccasarily win this game with Posey…I think alot of things went the lakers way, alot of hustle from everyone on the lakers who had to sit around and think about what we did to them last year… they clearly just wanted this one more on the lakers bench..our starters were for the most part fine…and I think all the 50/50 calls went the lakers way imo

by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 25, 2008 8:17 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

just calling it like I see it

we are thin on the bench and Posey was our 6th man

maybe it will work out by the end of the year, but I’m concerned

mind you, this doesn’t mean it was a mistake not resigning Posey – just that we miss him

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Dec 25, 2008 8:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah I miss Posey

and this 2nd unit misses him too, not gonna argue that, but I also think we lose this game with or without him

by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 25, 2008 8:22 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

this team with posey signed and playing would win the title

We might not have gotten TA and house if we held onto posey but THIS team with posey wins the next two years miinmum in a walk, a joke, not close. DA has made the decision to sacrifice the certain for the possible. he may be right. i think he is actually, but we need mutumbo or brown to walk through the door

by wahz on Dec 25, 2008 9:18 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Quite frankly, I would happily let Tony and House walk in exchange for Posey – and that’s always been my position. Tony continues to both giveth and taketh away with wildly inconsistent play and bad judgment.

by CoachBo on Dec 25, 2008 11:29 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not one mention of the officiating?

We shot 8 FTs. Hello? Anyone? Don’t give me this garbage about the C’s not taking it to the basket either. Most of their points where in the paint tonight.

This whole game was set up for LA to win. The over the top, almost completely one-sided pregame/halftime Lakers love fest, the officiating, the announcing.

I know, I’m just a crazy Boston homer and all that.

You won’t convince me there wasn’t a serious officiating bias today, though. It was beyond obvious.

by a tommy point on Dec 25, 2008 8:26 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The announcing

was so Laker biased it was ridiculous.

by silvershamrocker on Dec 25, 2008 8:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So biased that Van Gundy doesn't even think the Lakers will beat the Rockets?

If anything the broadcast was way too pro-Cleveland.

Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs

by Ozzie Montana on Dec 26, 2008 12:06 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

dude...

TA took the ball to the basket hard three straight possessions no call. there’s a replay of KG getting smacked on the arm by Odom, no call. ticky tack fouls on Perk. a ridiculous offensive foul on Rondo… the officiating was absolutely biased today.

by reggie35 on Dec 25, 2008 11:07 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

sweet preview of finals

When the Lakers play a physical game and win its obviously because the refs gave it them?
when teams go on 19 game winning streaks they get no help from the refs whatsoever?
kg is all you had today and even he was out talked by kobe. celtics didnt want this game and that is gonna loom large… gasol woke up from his siesta just in time and now celtics can’t double kobe and get away with it..

by only1in22yrs? on Dec 26, 2008 3:52 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm...

when teams go on 19 game winning streaks they get no help from the refs whatsoever?

I guess that’s how the Lakers of 71-72 won 33 straight.

2nd Infantry Division --- Second to None!

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 26, 2008 3:58 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

You are 100% correct. However, the same thing (biased officiating) in the Celtics’ favor resulted in home wins against the Hawks and Raptors…

Absolutely according to the predictable NBA script.

However, if Ray and Rajan had hit a couple of more shots the Celts would have been able to overcome the calls.

by nba is the worst on Dec 26, 2008 10:45 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What about...

1) The charging call against Fisher when he was not only sliding both feet (heels not planted) but also in the semi circle. What were the ref’s watching there?
2) The offensive foul on Rondo going up for a two handed dunk against Kobe. How do you make that call?

I’m not blaming the loss on officiating, but every time the Celtics were getting some momentum, the ref’s seem to stymie that with a no-call or a blown call. As mentioned, TA and Perk went hard to the basket several times and there were no whistles blown on apparent hack jobs by the purple and gold.

Some other observations
1) Every ball went the Lakers way but they also wanted this win badly. Ariza ran around like a mad man and made two huge saves on out of bounds plays that resulted in 4pts for the Lakers. I didn’t see the same for all the C’s. When that ball was chipped and TA just contently watched it bounce out at half court I almost lost it.
2) Our bench stunk out loud. GBB played decently, Powe got to the line a couple times, but TA was too inconsistent and the offense did not flow well at all. We went down 9pts pretty quickly and getting those back on the road against the Lake Show is tough.
3) Too many turns. The C’s were just not flowing. I can’t say this is all due to the Lakers D because several turnovers were uncontested, just plane BAD passes. You don’t see that much from Boston.

The big take away I had was we need some leadership off the bench and some more length as well. Losing Posey and PJ cost us both in those terms. We need to shore up this bench to go deep this season.

by Jimmy Flaherty on Dec 26, 2008 1:22 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

we are the better team

our beach let us down…rather lose now than later to these wanna bes.
Forgot how much i dislike Phil jackson.
He is a true phony with his zen BS.
Bottom line was not impressed with the lakers & DA must upgrade our bench.

by tommyfan on Dec 25, 2008 8:27 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Refs

I really think the refs were a major reason for the outcome of this game. That said….time to start the new streak! Go Celts.

by thirstyboots18 on Dec 25, 2008 8:28 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

On the road, on Christmas, vs. the third best team in the league (record wise), when they’ve been looking forward to it since the finals…

The Celtics are gonna lose some games. I just wish it wasn’t to the Lakers, and when Phil Jackson gets his 1000th win. Remember last year when we played the Lakers near Christmas and Jackson was about to pass Red in terms of games won?

It’s still a painful pill to swallow. Let’s hope that it’s a wake up call and motivation for our guys in green.

We’ll never hear the end of this one, though. Atleast not until the Celts beat them in Boston in a few months.

by silvershamrocker on Dec 25, 2008 8:29 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sleepwalking

Pierce’s eyes looked a little glazed over, unless he was rolling them at a call. I’ve been wondering if he is a little more hurt than he lets on, like Ray Allen last year.

by Thruthelookingglass on Dec 26, 2008 8:36 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Refs

Yes, the refs really called this one-sided. Many drives to the hoop without a whistle. No FTs until end of the half for a team that is dominating in the paint and gets to the line at almost 30 per game?

With that said, you had to expect this would be the case. I remember a Laker game earlier this season where they were called for only 8 team fouls the entire game….8!!!! That’s ridiculous. They are very protected.

Celtics can’t allow horrible officiating to take them out of their game. They almost got over the hump, but fell short.

Forget this one. On to GS. One game at a time. Go get the next.

- JoeB

by joeb on Dec 25, 2008 8:46 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn’t watch the game but only 8 ft attempts tells you that the refs were letting them play and maybe were letting the lakers play a little more than we were. we won 19 in a row so I’m not hanging my head. The Lakers HAD to win this game while we didn’t.

by Red2 on Dec 25, 2008 8:49 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ditto on the not enough Pierce and to much refs

Why, when Pierce is unstoppable in the 3rd, does he never see the ball in the 4th? Ray just started chucking and Rondo has not been looking for Paul all season. Pay attention next game and you will see times when Rondo sees Pierce WIDE open and doesn’t pass him the ball. I know he wants to make the all star squad, but it shouldn’t be at Pierce’s expense.

 Also, if we had used our playoff rotation like they did, we would have won the game.

by agh on Dec 25, 2008 8:54 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i was thinking the same thing about the refs in game 1 and 2 ....

where we were outshot 2-1 on free throws and powe went to the line more than kobe did….

that being said, it’s not a championship. it’s just a game. you guys still have the best record in the league and arguably the best team…

but it sure feels good to beat you guys…….i can’t lie about that…..

"They need security in the world, Craig!"

by Tuna Helper on Dec 25, 2008 9:03 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bench

We need a trade or FA pickup ASAP for our bench, and by our I mean Celtics.

by Champzilla on Dec 25, 2008 9:11 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

stupid game

1. the refs were horrible – two plays stick out; the outlet to Perk who is ahead of everyone; Ariza comes from behind, fouls him hard, runs past him out of bounds, jumps back in, and throws the ball downcourt to start the Laker offense; Gasol scores a 3-point play and the Lakers are up five; that was one play that pretty much decided the game; correct me if I’m wrong, but if a guy jumps out of bounds and back in, he can’t be the first one to touch the ball thereafter; it all happened right in front of the ref; two blown calls on one play, with the Lakers up two and 2:30 to go; the other play that was a complete abomination was the Rondo spin move on the baseline, he gets hacked by Kobe as he is putting down a dunk, and Rondo is called for the foul: another potential 4 point turnaround; those calls, plus the lack of FTs is ridiculous

2. no need to overreact – the score was tied 81 all with several minutes to go; besides those blown ref calls, Ray Allen missed a wide open 3 in the corner, which he usually nails; on the next possession, Gasol makes the elbow jumper and LA is playing ahead; if we’re playing ahead at that point, I like our chances; this was a game that could have gone either way up until the back to back Gasol shots

3. I rarely criticize KG, but why was he doubling or tripling Kobe and leaving Gasol wide open; Gasol is not great, but he is good; you can’t leave him open 10-15 feet from the basket like that; if Kobe beats you on a heave over two defenders, you live with that; but you don’t give up easy baskets going to the bucket

4. EH did not get it done as PG; he is adequate against 28 other teams; but against Cleveland and LA, he is not the right guy to be playing PG; other teams salivate on offense and defense when they see him in the game; he didn’t look great against Vujacic, and it would have been worse with Farmar; I don’t know why either Pierce or Ray wasn’t running the show with the 2nd unit; you have two HOF players, and they are reduced to creating a diversion for EH, TA and BBD, while they weave and spin to the basket; that’s just poor recognition

5. agree that Pierce was not involved enough, particularly earlier in the 4th Q; when the game is tight and you need points or FTs, the ball should be in his hands, and then Ray and KG

Having said all that, we didn’t play nearly our best game on offense or defense, and we still were in position to win the game. I don’t think the Lakers can play any better, and I don’t think we can play much worse (in a big game). KG was curiously subdued. I still think we’d win a series. But our bench definitely needs work. And the calls were horrendous. It made the game a kind of gimme for the Lakers. Yes, they had phony hustle in the last 2 minutes, after they had the lead. Celtics should have found a way to win. Like I said, stupid game.

by KJR on Dec 25, 2008 9:15 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You absolutely nailed it.

KJR, your analysis was dead-on. While I don’t like losing to the Lakers, our starters are superior to theirs, and we easily could’ve won this game despite the horrible calls. Also, what about Tony Allen getting fouled, then a jump ball, and an infraction on Pierce on the jump? What was that?

by libermaniac on Dec 25, 2008 10:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I replayed that play several times

And could never see one thing Pierce did to deserve a violation. Javey kept waving his hands in an out, not sure what that meant, but Pierce literally did not move. It seemed as if they were tipped off about that play last year when Pierce stepped in front of LeBron and Javey anticipated Pierce moving prematurely, but he did not. Unfortunately, most of NBA refereeing is from scouting reports of what players do or what Stern has told them to emphasize, rather than actually what happens right in front of them. I challenge Javey to explain the violation, there was none.

by KJ33 on Dec 25, 2008 10:50 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ditto

i was going to write the same thing… i’m going to write it anyway, because i need to rant…

by reggie35 on Dec 25, 2008 11:11 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

refs were horrible today

I usually think its homerism when I complain about calls but today I watched three games in a row and the inconsistency of the officiating is disturbing. Refs have to make the extra effort to make the calls evenly in close games. At least the Celtics didn’t play that well but the Wizards put in a great effort and got punked at the end.

by twinbree on Dec 26, 2008 1:25 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Celtics Have Gotten WAY More Calls This Season

Until this game…

Then of course, there’s ALSO last year’s Game 2, with a 38-10 free throw advantage IN A FINALS GAME ! ! !

Even in the 2 previous losses, the Celts got more fts than the Pacers AND (league-leading in ft attempts) Nuggets…

C’s fans can’t expect to get the calls all the time, that wouldn’t make for a compelling script.

That said, it is clear (to the unbiased) that the calls went significantly in favor of the Lakers…

by nba is the worst on Dec 26, 2008 10:56 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Speaking of calls down the stretch

I caught the tail end of the Cleveland – Washington game last night. Washington up 89-82 with a couple of minutes to go, and then Cleveland got every, and I mean every, call to close out the game and win.

It’s pretty disgusting, in truth.

by Mencius on Dec 26, 2008 11:17 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It can't hurt

it’s not personal.

Remember?

by Page_and_Plant on Dec 25, 2008 9:21 PM EST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

I forget

when did I say I didn’t care?

it isn’t personal in that I don’t wish ill on the fans of that team

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Dec 25, 2008 11:28 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Bench

Today’s game perfectly highlighted the need for a real 6th man. If anyone thought that Tony the Turnover could replace James Posey, this game should serve as a slap in the face. What this team needs is to rid themselves of Glen Davis, Scal, and TA and find a small forward that can actually play defense, along with a center that is not undersized. Unfortunately, in terms of free agents, only Dikembe Mutombo and Ira Newble come to mind as possible reserves. Any thoughts?

by Celtics Fanatic on Dec 25, 2008 9:29 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bench

Richard Hendrix was just released, Giddens and Walker are playing well, Chicago’s backcourt is much healthier than when the Bulls signed Lindsey Hunter, Stephen Graham might be worth looking into; just thinking out loud here. What do you have in mind?

by Celtics Fanatic on Dec 25, 2008 9:35 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t think that rookies are going to be an answer for a playoff team with hopes of a title. Deke or PJ are absolute musts; beyond that I’m not sure where the shooting and defense we allowed to stroll away are going to come from.

by CoachBo on Dec 25, 2008 11:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bench

I meant to say Joey Graham, not Stephen Graham.

by Celtics Fanatic on Dec 26, 2008 11:38 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bench comments are stupid

The game was tied until Gasol beat our starters 3 straight times. They were better today. The refs weren’t the game changers. Neither was the bench. We saw a little of “bad Tony” after not seeing in a while but the bench was OK. Big Baby did his job. We don’t know yet that OBryant can’t do it because they haven’t committed him yet. He is worth a look in game situations same as Leon was a year ago.
Listen people, we are what our record says we are (Tuna quote) and we are 27-3. Easy on the agida. The Lakers played excellent D. Joe Smith or Stephon Marbury wasn’t going to change this outcome.

by Wildblu1 on Dec 25, 2008 9:34 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I could not disagree with you more. The bench was atrocious in the second quarter. It wasn’t OK. It didn’t defend, it couldn’t score and it didn’t play with a lot of effort, either. You don’t answer those issues by throwing players who’ve failed to distinguish themselves in practice, such as O’Blount.

This team is totally deficient on the pine, and I will flatly go on record today – the Celtics will not repeat unless Danny finds length plus a shooter who can defend a little bit for this bench.

by CoachBo on Dec 25, 2008 11:33 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

This was just a replay of game 5 of the finals – poor officiating, Celtics played like crap but were still able to keep it close against a soft and inferior Lakers team playing at home and needing the game a lot more than the C’s.

I mean, streamers flying from the rafters? Really? That was a bit much. The Celtics are still the better team, losing on the road on what was not their finest hour by any means doesn’t change that fact.

by ReadyFor17 on Dec 25, 2008 9:36 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Another thing is Kobe didn’t have much trouble scoring, which could be because he was just hot – or could be because Posey was your best defender on him, and you do miss him.

Pierce did a great job on Kobe last year, guarding him mainly down the stretch.
I don’t think he guarded him at all today. Doc was treating this game just like any other…exactly how he said he would. Come playoffs we’ll see less bench and more strategizing.

by Jaycelt on Dec 25, 2008 10:22 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just another game

I know we lost the game, but still the Lakers just don’t scare me. The Cs simply played too sloppy to win on the road against a good team. It certainly does show the importance of home court, but so long as the Cs end with a better record and get 4 of 7 at home I’m not worried about LA. I’m really not convinced the Lakers will even make it to the Finals.

I’m 10x more concerned about the Cavs. It seems almost guaranteed that they’ll meet in the East finals and the combination of Lebron and the Cleveland bigs will give the Celtics as much as they can handle.

Great game tonight even though I spent most of the game screaming at the refs. Oh well.

by mattyweb on Dec 25, 2008 10:48 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did anyone mention Rondo?

Rondo didn’t play well today and I think that was the factor that could have won the game for the Celtics. Ray Allen only put up 14 as well. Overall this loss hurts.

by esp4p3 on Dec 25, 2008 11:06 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think rondo was taken out of the game by early foul trouble, which were all terrible calls by the way and then the ball wasnt in his hands enough, others were doing to much ball handling which is where hes at his worst…I think the lakers played this like a playoff game including thew rotations. celtics did not

by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 25, 2008 11:10 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It seems Jackson stradegy was to make Rondo a non-factor by getting him into foul trouble. I agree, Doc didn’t seem to treat this game like a playoff game. I think he should have played Pierce and Garnett more. It seemed like Kobe was in almost the whole game.

by esp4p3 on Dec 25, 2008 11:15 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Kobe played a game high 43 minutes, shot .565 from the floor (13-23), SHOT 0 FT’S, and led the Lakers with 9 boards. Ray was only 3-11 on threes, most were wide open. That’s the difference right there…

by nba is the worst on Dec 26, 2008 11:24 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Celtics played a good game, but the Lakers were on today! Felt and looked like a playoff game, but we still have more then half of the season to go until we make it to the finals!

by Lakersr#1 on Dec 25, 2008 11:06 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

turnovers by all

The Celts have no control over the refs. They were bad but were not the difference. The bench wasn’t great, but Phil changed his rotations. Considering they played against the starters more than normal, the bench was OK. In my opinion, the real problem here is that the Celtics are nearly the worst team in the league in turnovers. The first team is VERY guilty here. If the starters simlply cut the turnovers down by 5 possessions, we have a 4-5 point lead in the last four minutes. We win the game, then.

I agree the refs were terrible, but we weren’t much better outside of KG.

by MurphyHOF on Dec 25, 2008 11:11 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The officials weren’t just bad, they were atrocious. The offensive foul on Rondo and the phantom foul on TA on the jump ball were just the icing on the cake. David Stern ought to resign in shame.

Having said that, the starters had the game in their grasp and played like absolute crap for the last four minutes. So they deserved to lose.

Another bad game from House. The offense stagnates when he’s in there. It’s time for Gabe Pruitt to become the first pg off the bench.

by Brickowski on Dec 25, 2008 11:16 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

home cooking

1) The refs were inconsistent in the Lakers favor today. 2 Ft’s in the first half, 8 for the game. Several head scratchers, mentioned by many posts above. There’s a reason home court advantage exists in basketball, and it’s not because the home team gets to bat last. The C’s need home court.

2) Ray did not play well tonight. He chucked up some wish shots and missed some shots he normally makes. Also had some bad turnovers. He also seemed out of it mentally. I saw him get more heated at a ref today then I have in his C’s career. Plus that double foul on Fisher was just weird. The whole xmas thing probably messed with his Rainman routine.

3) The decision to leave Ray in over Pierce at the beginning of the fourth was a mistake. Pierce was starting to go on an epic run.

4) The Lakers are NOT much better this year. A healthy Ariza will be a much bigger factor than Bynum if he can stop Pierce.

5) Doc needed to get a technical in this game. It seemed like the whole team (minus Pierce maybe) was too much in the xmas spirit.

6) Is anyone absolutely sick of how much ABC and the NBA are trying to force Kobe and LeBron on us? (much like Kobe forces himself on young women). “Oh, what’s it like being the mvp Kobe? What’s it like building homes for poor little children?” or “Hey isn’t LeBron so awesome with his big sneaker contract and his ability to win even though his teammates are all SOOO terrible?” You have a TEAM, in the Celtics, that stands for everything good in sports: togetherness, hard work, sacrificing individual goals for the team, perseverance. They win a championship, 19 games in a row, and yet we’re playing there on Christmas day, we watch LaLa Land coverage, and get LeBron is god commercials.

7) The Celtics win a seven game series against this LA team (with or without home court). They played crappy, had no help from the refs, and still were in a position to win.

by reggie35 on Dec 25, 2008 11:32 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and 8)

the Celtics needed a game like this. Some guys (Rondo in particular) were getting a little too cocky. This ought to stoke the flames a bit and add some substance to the “we need to get better” blurb the players spout after every game.

by reggie35 on Dec 25, 2008 11:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agree on T

I thought the exact same thing in the second quarter. I don’t think this is a great idea very often, but it would have galvanized the starting group and let the officials know that he wanted the game even with the hostile crowd. I don’t think any ref wants to give a T on national television unless he is forced to. Doc getting a T is rare enough that it would have made a great statement for the officials to discuss at halftime.

by MurphyHOF on Dec 26, 2008 7:17 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We just got outplayed tonight. It took their best effort and one of our worst, and we were still within reach.

One thing, I don’t think its fair to throw our bench under the bus given it was a tie game with less than 3 minutes left.

by D Dub on Dec 25, 2008 11:36 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sorry guys

Take it like men and stop whining about the refs. Waaaah. See you in June, if you guys make it past Lebron.

by Chobe B on Dec 25, 2008 11:47 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Celtics didn’t look play anywhere as hungry as the lakers in fact they didn’t look as if they particularly care if they won. Its amazing they didn’t get blown out they were sloppy on both ends of the floor most of the time. Rondo gets tentative with foul trouble so its understandable he wasn’t as aggressive. The team needs to work on their consistency on the road. My problem with the bench today is that they completely ignored Ray on multiple possessions maybe they forgot he was there since they’re used to being the all bench unit. Overall a learning experience I’m sure the tape of this game will show them enough instances of the areas they need to work on.

by twinbree on Dec 25, 2008 11:53 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Play Pruitt and sign Motombo.

I’m surprised only Brickowski has mentioned the issue that seems quite obvious. House isn’t getting it done as a point guard, and Doc should be playing Pruitt instead. What’s the holdup? How many second quarter leads do the Celtics have to squander?

And since Doc won’t play O’Bryant, then get Motombo in here pronto.

by no kidding on Dec 26, 2008 12:47 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think every problem has been pretty well covered. And anything we say as fans critical about our team which is now 27-3 is going to sound silly

to some of you. Truth is some of us have remained panicked over the Posey loss. I spent 12 hours watching every play of the finals on nba tv replayed and felt worse at the end of that. NO WAY we win that series without Posey.
Who is in the game instead at those moments? Well, we found out yesterday that Doc did change his rotations some, (come on guys he had more starters in with the bench on most of the occassions), and we end up playing Perk and Rondo more and Posey is absorbed that way. But we have nothing that is similar to the KG, PP, Posey, Ray, House lineup that brought uis back in game 4 last year, not to mention at several critical periods against Cle. We don’t have the guy who can guard the 3 and the 4 and spread the floor on offense. We have to count on the starters getting 36-42+ minutes and have TA, House, Baby etc fillng in. Similar to the 86 team. It may work. But we don’t have the horses to do it like last year. The closest you get to a Posey like guy is George of Dallas. He is like the lowest minor league version and Dallas wouldn’t cough him up anyway.

Blowing Posey is a catostrophe if you believe that going small with KG at center and having 4 other 3 balls shooters who can all defend is needed to win a title. I mean you’all relaize that is what we did right? We could have a lineup of aggressive defenders and 4 of them were great jump shooters and they could play for entire halves if need be..

Those days are gone. But if we have guys who can fill in adequately for the starters, who are chamionship quality for sure, we can still win it. I agree we need mutumbo NOW. And I am saying NOW because it gives some time to analyze if we need to try to make a trade to get a guy like Pose, someone with a similar skill set to Pose. Our tradeable assets are TA, Baby or Powe, and of the kids, draft picks.

And no I am not panicked. I keep saying I think we can pull it out as long as we sign PJ or Deke. You all realize how big and good Cle is right?

by wahz on Dec 26, 2008 11:25 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rondo and Allen arguing

Did anyone notice during the beginning of the third quarter when Ray and Rondo were arguing with each other over the turn over that Ray did and then when they were on the defensive end of the court, rondo was guarding Fisher and you see Rondo screaming at Ray about the TO… and it looked like a heated argument. Even Pierce had to go and grab Ray and move him to his defensive position that he was supposed to be on. It literally looked like Rondo and Ray were ready to beat each other up, if Pierce didn’t intervene.

Another thing was when Pierce had to grab Ray again during the offensive foul call that he “made” against Fisher because he was arguing with the ref, and that’s not Ray Allen like. Ray seemed really pissed off from the beginning of the game to the end, and it escalated throughout the game. Every camera shot I saw of Ray, he looked like he wanted to punch someone in the face..

As a matter of fact, the whole team seemed like something was bothering them. They didn’t act or look like a team, but more like individuals.. Yes the first 5 min of the bball game, they looked like everything was ok. But towards the middle of the 1st quarter things started to unravel.

And the Celtics didnt look like the Celtics. It looked like this was a diff team. Not by the way they were playing, but their faces, and their posture, and attitude. Im watching the game again, and they just look so mad at each other. They didnt have team chemistry at all.

When the bench came on, it was the same thing. No one worked like a team, and played selfishly. Maybe im looking into more than what it was, but everyone seemed so disconnected with each other.

Im guessing something must have happened during the flight on the way to LA, or the locker room or something. Because from what Im seeing now, or the way the game went, the whole Celtics team seemed as tho everyone had beef with each other. There were no celebrations or high fives when we tied the games or lead. There were no smiling or laughing or talking on bench like u see during the games. Everyone was just sitting and watching the game…

Something was off. And that Ray and Rondo argument and Pierce separating it b4 it got worse, (which i’m sure it wouldn’t have) give me more ammo to go on that something was up with the whole team…

Did anyone else see what Im talking about?

by Mizzy21390 on Dec 26, 2008 2:12 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In a word, yes.

That was not the team I’ve been watching lately. Very little communication between Celts was evident through the tube. Not very expressive period. In a tight game those on the bench are usually cheering the others on, last night Pierce and KG sat expressionless while the outmanned bench was in.

On the other hand, I have no idea what to make of it.

by Thruthelookingglass on Dec 26, 2008 8:52 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thoughts

1) I’m sick of the idea that Posey is the answer to everything that goes wrong. When the team wins big things are a-ok withough Posey but when things are bad, the sky is falling and the only anecdote is James Posey. Look, I’ll be first to admit that Pose was a great part of this team last season, but Posey does not win this game for the Celtics and is not the answer people seem to think he is. If we lost this game with Posey people would complain that he can’t create his own shot, is an overrated defensive player and doesn’t have the ball handling skills we need on the second unit. Danny was correct in not giving in to the contract demands Posey wanted. It would tie this teams hands in the salary cap for far too long. Posey playing in this game would not have been the answer. It just seems like that is the default answer to anything that goes wrong, “well if we had just resigned Posey this wouldn’t be happening”, give me a break.

2) The ref’s were attrocious in this game. Call it whining, call it complaining, I don’t care, it absolutely effected this game and besides robbing the Celtics of a good 8 points (which would have made a large difference) shaped, in an unfortunate way, the way the Celtics played this game.

3) Tied into point 1. Everybody, and they are correct, says we need length off the bench. Well guess what, that ain’t Posey. Better to now have money available to sign Dekembe or PJ. (I opt for Mutumbo myself, exactly what we need on the second unit, inside presence, D, shot blocks and boards, I do think he would be a better asset to this team than PJ) Don’t say we need Posey and then say we need length and a big. Can’t have it all.

by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Dec 26, 2008 3:06 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmmm...

Posey’s defensive ability allowed him to guard just about any position on the opposing team. If he was still with the C’s, he could have bothered Odom and Bryant a little bit. Unfortunately, he is not wearing the Celtics green anymore. The Lakers also had the benefit of having Bynum and Ariza play this year unlike last years playoffs when they were out. Tony Allen, EHouse, and Big Baby played decently.I think having a PJ Brown type player and a versatile swing player will be Danny Ainge’s next priority. But, who are available out there? The team is paying Scab a lot of money to be sitting on the bench. He was Danny’s big free agent signee years back but I really feel he needs to go. By waving him, take a salary hit, but it will enable them to sign a decent player. With him and Sam I Am, they have a 15 man roster and won’t be able to sign a player or two.

2nd Infantry Division --- Second to None!

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 26, 2008 3:07 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also...

the refs gave the Lakers a big Christmas present. Javie has got to be one of the worst refs, if not the worst.

2nd Infantry Division --- Second to None!

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 26, 2008 3:08 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

uggh

Just an extra reminder that Posey was absolutely lost on Kobe in the finals last year, it took PP stepping up and playing D on him to make a difference. And you know what? Tonight Kobe did what only he can do, against great D hit insane shots. That is why he is still, despite what people may say about Lebron, or whomever, the best offensive player in the league. On how many possessions tonight did the C’s play great D and Kobe hit a shot no one has any right to make, and make it look easy? Numerous. Sometimes there is a player who can do that and you just have to say, well, we did what we could he got it done.

by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Dec 26, 2008 3:27 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Next

Odom hits 2 big threes unguarded I may add. Pau hits uncontested 12 footer and a basically uncontested dunk in the last minute. We go through spells of terrible rebounding on the defensive glass leading to more threes. The NBA once again can’t seem to get the officiating right on a big stage and ABC appears to have the can’t comment about calls edict.

And… it’s anyones game with 2 minutes to go.

A couple of minor tweaks to the roster and everything will be fine.

by Hondo on Dec 26, 2008 5:35 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ABC announcers are worse that that

It’s not just not commenting on (blatantly obvious) bad calls, it’s the “They’re letting them play” after the no calls…

JVG showing his Rockets loyalty was funny, too.

by nba is the worst on Dec 26, 2008 11:38 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yessh

I love when every comment says something like “Well, we sucked tonight and they played way over their heads, so it’s okay.” That’s bullshit. The fact is that tonight, the Celtics got outplayed and lost. No excuses.

http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.

by Carl Johnson on Dec 26, 2008 6:05 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agree

Celtics wanted this just as much as the Lakers, with the streak going. Just as the Celtics prevented the Lakers from playing Lakers basketball in June, give LA some credit for being the cause of whatever problem you think the C’s had going yesterday. Instead of blaming the evenly called officiating, blame the crucial turnovers Boston had in the 4th quarter when they could’ve extended a lead or tied.

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 10:23 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes

turnovers and d were the problem but just judging by rotations it was clear the lakers put a bit more stock in this game. doc stuck with the normal rotations, jackson did not. kobe played 43 minutes whereas he averages about 35 per game.

by ChainSmokingLikeDino on Dec 26, 2008 11:30 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Guess you don't watch the Lakers much

Judging by the Lakers rotations, they were the SAME in this game as they are in every game. If you think they were different, it’s because Farmar is out for 2 months, and he’s our 2nd Unit PG, hence, more Kobe with 2nd Unit. Did you notice that? Other than that, it was the same. The Lakers played 9 guys, just like the Celtics did.

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 11:52 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow, the Celtics just downright scare me. As a Lakers fan, I know we wanted this more and the Celtics played like shit today but it was still a close game towards the end. Celtics probably could easily pull off impressive win streaks if they really wanted to. Rondo has been absolutely tearing it up as of late and of course you got the Big 3 in KG, Pierce, and Ray Ray. Even though the Lakers win yesterday somewhat alleviates the mentality for them, the Celtics are still clearly the better team right now. In fact, I would put the Celtics and Cavs as the best teams in the NBA with the Lakers behind them.

Now, with all that said, you guys just need to suck it up and quit complaining about the refs. Refs are going to be horrible just about every game and yes, teams like the Lakers will get the favorable calls. But so will teams like the Cs. Honestly, these are the reasons why home-court advantage is so big in the playoffs. It’s not like you guys have never been on the better end of horrible officiating. Last year’s finals game 1 and 2 come to my mind as a Lakers fan. I understand that as fans, we’re going to be upset about the bias in the refs no matter how much of a good job they do. But we all just need to accept the fact that officiating is never going to be good and that if the team is good enough (which Cs certainly are), it will overcome them (which Cs almost did).

And no, I do not think Bynum is the answer to everything, if anything. Before his injury last year, he was on a roll but ever since then, he looks tentative, scared, and just flat out tired. Maybe he’s out partying every night since he got that fat contract extension (bad decision) but he’s simply not the same. That’s the main reason why the Lakers were and will continue to get beat inside by the Celtics: not being able to play physical basketball. Unfortunately, the Celtics are the best in the league at doing just that. And current Bynum is a perfect example of that. WIth his physique, he should be dominating but he can’t even take it the rim against the Celtics.

All in all, as much as I hate the Celtics, I have mad respect for them and their fans. Some of the most hardcore fans I know are from Boston. It truly saddens me to see you guys get antagonized over the media for being “bandwagon” fans because frankly, LA is guilty of that more than anyone. Anyways, I hope we are granted with a rematch of last year’s finals and hopefully the Lakers can put up more of a fight than they did last year.

by chrisbeomsuh on Dec 26, 2008 8:14 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can't argue with any of those points.

… except for Bynum’s play. (I’ve no idea of how well he’s playing up to his potential.)

by no kidding on Dec 26, 2008 9:10 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

hard loss

Officiating is quite biased, but i think its happening everywhere.
I hate losing with Lakers but like old guys said “not everyday is your B-day”.

And lets stop talking about Posey, that if he is here we something like that.. Last season was history and everybody move on, and James Posey is not part of the team anymore (though we him, yeah). Continue discussion including the name of Posey is INSULT to the current Bench rosters that we say cannot win without him(Posey).

Bench problems are not only because of thier Poor Play, but also from bad rotation and decision from Coach. Yesterday 2nd Quarter showed it. But when they inserted 2nd unit members with at least 3 of the starters they play well (see TA, BBD).

I mean that loss was tough, but whining cannot help.
Last year was 66-16, and where we are now?
Just go Celtics!!! Win as you can..

by spoiled on Dec 26, 2008 8:32 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

sandbagging

Doc is throwing the 2nd five to the wolves EVERY 2nd qtr to get rest for the starters.That will not happen in the playoffs and 2 more guys will be added to the top 8 in rotation…this is a 82 game practice for the real games…we need 2 players and Danny will get them

by Motown on Dec 26, 2008 9:41 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Won't happen?

Hmmm. That’s funny. Big Baby, Powe, Tony Allen, and Eddie House all played in last year’s playoffs didn’t they. Not only that but Eddie House was one of the top 3 reason the Celtics beat the Lakers in the Finals. Both team played 9 guys yesterday. Check the box score.

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 10:18 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

8 to 15

Celtic FT attempts to Laker FT attempts. If that was home cooking, then my step mom must’ve been in the kitchen.

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 10:21 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

did not see the game—xmas and all that, so my comments are limited and connected to what others have posted.1. the reffing in the nba is so subjective and inconsistent. you never know what you’re gonna get. the coaches and players have to be super aware of the refs whims that night that it must take away some of their focus from their game. i hold stern totally accountable for this. 2.the bench. i agree with brick- let’s get some more floor time for gabe. and we all know we need center type length. 3. as great as pp is playing this year, and he really digs in on defense, his shooting percentage is way down. is it because he’s hurting, or the offense isn’t going thru him enough? i agree when he’s hitting like yesterday,keep giving him the ball. 4. i don’t think danny is asleep and i hope he has some magic up his sleeve.

by nazzbo on Dec 26, 2008 10:26 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not too worried

This was a winnable game on the road against one of the two other great teams in the league.

The big thing here is that Doc needs to understand that the second team needs one decision maker out there. The other talent needed on the second team is there. He doesn’t have someone guiding the team. When Eddie House and Tony Allen are on the floor, sometimes they are successful and sometimes they are clueless, but they are not good at making pressure decisions. He will need Ray or Paul to be on the floor and the offense needs to be guided by them.

Ray was out there with the second unit, and it was Tony Allen that was consistently controling what was going on. Leon barely got the ball, and Ray barely got any touches either. If we had made Ray the decision maker instead of Tony, we would have won the game. The second team should be getting Leon the ball down low, and that didn’t happen.

by td450 on Dec 26, 2008 10:43 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think it should be Rondo

I think Rondo should’ve been out there instead of Ray Allen with the 2nd Unit. He’s young and can handle it and would handle the ball instead of House or TA, two guys are are NOT PG’s. Rondo’s ability to get to the rack or find open guys would put more pressure on the defense, rather than freezing out Ray and House, and stying 8 ft. off of T when he has the ball.

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 11:25 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Echoing some thoughts...

1. Posey was not the reason the Celtics didn’t win this game. Ray played good defense, Kobe made some tough shots. But it was Gasol who burned the Celtics down the stretch. Sure there was on bucket created by a Kobe drive and kick because KG came off Pau to help on Kobe, but I think KG’s help was probably not necessary.

2. Bench needs a scorer. Posey/PJ/Mutumbo isn’t the answer to fix the lack of bench scoring. Last year Powe really gashed the Lakers at times. Phil seemed to make an adjustment of keeping Bynum in the game while Leon was on the floor to negate that advantage for the Celts. Good move by Phil, Doc didn’t have a counter. However, when its 4 benchers and 1 starter, that starter has to touch the ball on just about every possession. Too often Ray was frozen out of the play when he was out on floor with the 2nd unit. JVG was screaming about it, and he was right.

3. Refs were a mild obstacle, but the Celts should have overcome. Certainly the officiating could have been a bit more balanced. There were quite a few drives that resulted in heavy contact from which the Celtics could have earned a trip to the line. I also think both of those Ariza saves should have been negated by whistles, the first as I think he was out of bounds, the second for the ridiculous hack on Perk (however throwing an outlet to Perk and expecting him to take the ball from above the foul line and score with a man on him is just a dumb decision). That being said, the Celts were tied late in the game and have no one to blame but themselves for letting it get away.

4. Amazingly, Odom had an impact. Without those “uncharacteristic” three pointers from LO, I’m not sure that the Lakers win the game. Given the opportunity to make those again, I’m not sure he’d get them down.

5. This means nothing.
If the Celtics had won I’d say the same thing. Championships are not won or lost in one game in December.

When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"

by Green17 on Dec 26, 2008 11:01 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agree

Sounds about right to me. Although the non calls you mentioned go both ways. I thought two of the blocking fouls called on Fish were actually charges, but that happens.

One win in December is not four wins in the Finals.

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 11:21 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Officials Were Not a "Mild Obstacle"

Sorry, but that doesn’t fly. It’s easy to criticize fans for whining about the officials after a loss, but last night was an absolute hatchet job. The officials created at least 4-5 multi-point swings in favor of the Lakers. Meanwhile, the Celtics shot exactly two free throws in the first half and got shafted with phantom calls in the second half.

This game was a set up. The league and the networks wanted the Lakers to win, and that’s what happened. Ken Maurer and his crew made sure of it.

I would invite those who are neither Laker fans nor Celtics fans to watch a tape of that game and comment on the officiating. The ’piece de resistance" was the play where Gasol grabs KG in the post and tries to drag him down. The pro-Laker announcers say “Foul on Gasol” and then go to a commercial break. Upon returning from the break the foul is suddenly on Garnett. What, did ABC think fans would forget the play during the commercial break?

Really, at some point the officiating is going to drive me away from the NBA. It ruins game after game.

by Brickowski on Dec 26, 2008 1:04 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mauer wasn't involved, Brick

I’m right there with you as a big detractor of his, but it seems a tad steep to blame him for a game he didn’t officiate.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Dec 26, 2008 1:12 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm...

Game 2 of the Finals didn’t turn you away?

by wondahbap on Dec 26, 2008 1:25 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ken Maurer, Steve Javie… they’re all the same and they all suck.

by Brickowski on Dec 26, 2008 3:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn't understand...

…the stop-Kobe defense in the last four minutes. Why did they go away from Ray or Tony playing him straight up? Yeah, he had 27 points, but on like 23 shots or something. Once the Celtics started throwing three guys at him, he found Gasol wide open. Of course. I’d rather have Kobe taking contested jumpers than Gasol wide open for eight-footers.

Hated that defensive change, which along with some terrible terrible officiating and the Cs failure to let Pierce abuse Walton in the fourth quarter cost them the game.

by Ersatz on Dec 26, 2008 11:26 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Relax on the Bench guys...

The bench played poorly, so what. Does anyone remember the same chatter last year about our bench? Even when we had Posey, everyone pointed to that as the main reason we WOULDN’T win a title last year. This game was lost by our starting backcourt. The same backcourt that has been arguably the best in the NBA this year. Rondo was nowhere near the same player we’ve seen through the last 19 games. This had nothing to do with the Lakers, and more on our gameplan.

Oh and surprise surprise, Ray Allen had an off night. Ray Allen’s brilliance has been a direct result to Rondo setting him up for wide open shots because of his penetration. Granted Ray missed some shots he normally makes, but the flow of the offense for the Celtics was not there from the get go, and it starts at the point guard position. Sure we will make some midseason moves, which will probably impact this team as much as last year’s midseason moves impacted them (that means not much, incase you’re wondering). Van Gundy could not be more wrong, our bench is more than capable of helping us win our 18th championship right now!

SCOTT

by Vegas Scott on Dec 26, 2008 12:01 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pretty Funny

How fans always complain about the same things, FT and refs. One: FTs was given to the team that attacks the inside more. The Lakers consistently drove inside while the Celtics mainly settled for jumpshots. You can’t expect both teams to have identical FTA. Two: refs: You honestly expect a perfect ref game? There is always bad calls on both sides (Odom’s loose ball, Rondo’s offensive foul) but players learn to adjust, the Celtics didn’t lose the game until under the 4 minute mark and they completely choked(Besides KG). And if you know anything about recent NBA history, you’d know Steve Javie hates Kobe and the Lakers.

by Fundefined on Dec 26, 2008 3:46 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Flop calls...

I thought were discouraged by the NBA and would be a non-call or a blocking foul? With that said, when Powe flopped on Fisher, it was called a block. When Fisher flopped, of course it was called a charge. Only a player from Hollywood can get away from a call like that.

2nd Infantry Division --- Second to None!

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 26, 2008 3:56 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Players

With good reputation and star power gets those calls. Fisher is a former star, captain and president of the players association, he’s going to get that call most of the time, same with any star. Powe doesn’t have much rep. besides being a energy bench player. As a ref. they are going to trust Fisher over Powe any day.

by Fundefined on Dec 26, 2008 4:03 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The refs

You guys make so many excuses. Remember when the Lakers shot 28 less free throw attempts than Boston in the Finals? I bet you guys weren’t complaining about officiating then, even though it was blatantly obvious how much the refs helped you guys win game 2. The officiating was disgustingly one sided, and the Lakers still only one.

And now you guys complain that you only got 8 ft’s in LA. Wow.. just wow.

What’s the excuse for the recent loss against Golden State? Bad refs, again? Fatigue?? God knows it can’t be because the Celtics just plain LOST. There has to be some outside force at work, because the Celtics are unbeatable otherwise. Right?

No, you guys didn’t lose because the Lakers played a good game. You lost because of the refs. So typical.

by lalball81 on Dec 28, 2008 3:23 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And by the way

I could point out lots of questionable calls against the Lakers on Christmas day. I wouldn’t do that, because I’m not a whiner. Each team receives bad calls, they have to play through it. While the Celtics were crying to the refs, the Lakers continued to play hard.

by lalball81 on Dec 28, 2008 3:27 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Shamrock-blk-trans_small
FanPost 101 - You Be The Blogger

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Danny slipping?
Small
The Celtics offseason? My rants.
Small
Boston Celtics
Nba_small
The Rasheed Wallace Effect: Part Boston
Rondojer_small
An open letter to Danny: why you messed up.
Small
less is more
Small
ESPN Ultimate Team Tankings
Small
Springfield Development Team - Springfield Armor
Ruby_7-08_hb_2yrs_old_002__2__small
Celtics To Leon: Business is Business!
Small
Prince luke richard mbah amoute to celtics

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Authors

Picture_1_small Jim Weeks

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Small The Duke33

Parrotface_small dobbs

Po3_small Master Po

Small Jughead

Small CelticBalla32

Small petula

Small hankfinkel

Small Bent

Moderators

300h_small Wide Load

Small CfanMissippi

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Donoghus

Small Chris72

Capt_small redzdeadbabyredzdead

Ud_small indeedproceed

Small thirstyboots18

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports