Hat Tip To Pau and Friends
A Daily Babble Production
Pau Gasol has received a lot of grief over the last couple of seasons regarding his perceived softness on both ends of the floor and an inferred tendency to shrink in big spots.
Whether that reputation is entirely fair overall, I'm not sure. What I am certain about is that if we are going to call Pau's toughness and play in the clutch into question, it would be disingenuous not to recognize him when he does step up in crunch time. That is exactly what he did in yesterday's Christmas Day circus with the Celtics.
Sure, the three rebounds in 35 minutes or the couple of alley-oop dunks he allowed Kevin Garnett didn't do much to improve his defensive reputation. But when the game was on the line, he was without doubt the best player on the floor.

With the game tied at 81, Gasol began his own personal 7-2 run. For the second time on the day, the Celtics gave him space from 15 feet, and Gasol rattled one home once more. He came down the lane to make a catch and float in a baby jumper on the run. After Garnett knocked down a jumper to keep the Celts within two, Gasol followed with the sequence that broke the game. He curled around a screen from the left block into the lane to catch and finish while drawing contact from Paul Pierce. Iffy call or otherwise, Gasol not only made the shot but hit his sixth free throw in as many tries to complete the three-point play. When he blocked Ray Allen's three at the other end to set up Trevor Ariza's uncontested dunk that put the Lakers up seven with 1:12 to play, Gasol effectively iced the game.
It took all of 95 seconds. Pau Gasol went 3-for-3 from the field and 1-for-1 from the line with a blocked shot to push the Lakers from an 81-81 tie to a 90-83 lead en route to a 92-83 victory. He finished with 20 points on 7-for-14 shooting from the field, a perfect day at the foul line, five assists, three rebounds and three blocks. Again, the rebounding and defense could have been markedly better (Garnett did shoot 11-for-14, after all), and Gasol could have done without going flying like a rag doll when he collided with Rajon Rondo, on whom Gasol only has 11 inches and some 70-plus pounds. But at the end of the day, he got the job done in the biggest spots, and the Celtics didn't. So kudos to Pau for coming up in the clutch this time around.
Similarly, Kobe Bryant earned his share of credit. In eight regular season and Finals games against the Celts last year, Kobe shot better than 50 percent from the field on exactly one occasion. Yesterday, he not only went 13-for-23 (with a couple of made field goals at tremendous degrees of difficulty), but he also made solid decisions with the basketball down the stretch, assisting on all three buckets of the Gasol run plus Ariza's dunk to seal it. Speaking of Ariza, his two saves on the baseline were huge plays for the Lakers.
Beyond those respective tips of the cap, it just doesn't seem healthy to get too riled about this one as a Celts fan. The Lakers, one of the league's three best teams, played a very good all-around game, as evidenced by Bryant's uncharasteric success with the Celts, Gasol's clutch play, Ariza's hustle and the fact that Lamar Odom came off the bench to can treys on consecutive possessions late in the third quarter.
On the other side, the Celtics played far from their best basketball. Kevin Garnett was excellent offensively, and Paul Pierce came up big in the third quarter. Ray Allen didn't shoot the ball well, and we'll be kind and say that Rajon Rondo was up and down. The bench showed no issue that it hadn't already over the last two months (length, offensive stagnation, hemorrhaging points allowed defensively), and it simply came back to bite a bit more against a better opponent. I'm not working myself into enough of a lather to give myself a coronary about Tony Allen this morning. The team defense had its moments but was largely inefficient overall. These things happen. Sometimes, they all conspire to happen on the same day, which has now happened exactly once in the last six weeks and three times since the season opened.
The Celtics are 27-3, tied for the best 30-game start in the history of the game. They have the same flaws and concerns that they did when they were 27-2 and in sole possession of the best 29-game start in the history of the game. The Lakers were better yesterday than the Celtics were, but I got up from the couch no more a believer that the Lakers will be better than the C's in June than I was before I sat down.
As for the officiating, to put it simply, whatever. The Celtics shoot 29.6 foul shots per game, second most in basketball. The Lakers shoot 27.6 foul shots per game, fourth most in basketball. The two teams combined for 23 attempts yesterday. Seems like an anomaly all around. Yes, the Lakers took seven more shots from the line, and there were more than a few calls that I didn't like in real time. There were also more than a few calls that made me realize I was wrong and the officials right when I watched the replay. The Celtics shoot an average of 3.4 more times per game from the stripe than their opponents. Officials haven't exactly been out to get our boys this year. The game was in Los Angeles, and none of the deplorable triumvirate of Ken Mauer, Bennett Salvatore or Violet Palmer were involved. I'll survive without further complaint.
The Lakers played better than the Celtics and deserved to win on December 25th. Hats off to them. I'm proud to say that our beloved Celtics are once again enough of a power in this league to merit a Christmas Day appearance. I wish said appearance had ended differently, but I'm sure l glad to sit down next to my father and watch it.
But that was all December 25th. Today is December 26th. Which means it is now time to worry only about beating the Golden State Warriors.
Comments
Completely agree
Gasol deserves lots of credit for his crunch time playing yesterday. I have the feeling that many times people forget how good Gasol is, now that he’s playing second banana to Kobe. I mean, he was the best player of a good playoffs team for years. Some of those teams had guys like Stromile Swift or Chucky Atkins as their 3rd or 4th best scorers and still managed to get around 50 wins every year.
by cordobes on
Dec 26, 2008 1:30 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I can partially disagree
The fact that Pau was decisive in the final minutes doesn’t mean he is tough and a great player. Don’t get me wrong, he is a good player, to be more precise… a well-beyond average player. Now, he just make the shots because Koby was double-teamed and Koby had the phenomenal abilty to find him open (3 times!). But if you watched the beginning the of the game, when he played KG 1on1 defensively and offensively, he just pretty much suck. We tend to remember (logically) the last 3 mins of a game. But if you analyze carefully, you see that he is not that good. To close, this comment is coming from somebody who’s entire family comes from Spain!. That’s is being objective.
by CelticsMeansPride on
Dec 26, 2008 1:44 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
So which part are you disagreeing with exactly?
I didn’t claim he was tough. I didn’t claim he was necessarily a great player. I did acknowledge the defensie issues you referenced not once but twice in the piece above. But he absolutely stepped up in the clutch yesterday, which was the premise of the column. There were no long-term generalizations made about Pau above.
Seems like we’re on the same page to me…except that I’m not sure how you went from calling Pau “well-beyond average” to “not that good” in the span of a few lines. Beyond that, it sure seems to me that the other sentiments you voiced were right there in the piece.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Dec 26, 2008 1:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lets be clear..
If the C’s would have won on the 26th..Ya’ll would be sportin wood for a year. It would be “See..The Lakers aren’t on our level” Amomg other things.The fact that The venerable Celtic’s had not won a title in over 20 is aprapoe here.Since before last year ya’ll have grown accustomed to loseing..Writting off this loss as another hoe hum game..After all of the hype from ya’ll is funny…Get used to it. Kobe didn’t shoot a foul shot in this game. If that isn’t proof that the NBA is carrying the Celtic’s..Well..I don’t know what is.
by jetfuelgeorge on
Jan 26, 2009 12:30 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Steve, I thank you for not including a photo of Gasol’s “victory grimace” with this article. Seeing that hit celebrate makes me want to puke.
But you’re right. As painful as it was to see, he did indeed take charge of the Laker offense during that final stretch. More salt in the wound, but hopefully more impetus for the Cs to step up their game as others on this forum have mentioned.
Well, I guess all that’s left to do is pity Golden State!
by Hal Jordan on
Dec 26, 2008 1:55 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
No worries, Hal - you couldn't have paid me to post that photo
Trust me, the image was as vomit-inducing for me as it was for you. But I felt the praise for yesterday’s performance was owed to him.
Let’s roll it up in Oaktown tonight – we lost there last year on a Davis jumper over TA at the gun if I recall correctly. I’d love to get that one back.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Dec 26, 2008 2:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry,
I refuse to give credit to any Laker!
by Bankshot on
Dec 26, 2008 2:28 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Furthermore
He still looks like a llama.
God bless and good night!
by BrickJames on
Dec 26, 2008 2:54 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Pau should be applauded for having a good game yesterday and he’s having anotther very solid season, as he always does. But his critics criticize him for his lack of being tough and coming up clutch in the playoffs for the most part. He took memphis nowhere but to first round ousts in his time there and his game shrank when he hit the playoffs.
Last year’s Finals did nothing to change that perception. And as well as he played yesterday, especially at crunch time and on the defensive end late, it was still just a regular season game and the only people putting pressure on the Lakers as to the overall importance of this game was themselves.
Until he helps to bring a championship the Lakers way while giving huge contributions that exhibit his toughness and clutchness, he’s still going to be the great soft player who shrinks in big games to me.
by nickagneta on
Dec 26, 2008 2:39 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll take KG and PP over Kobe and Pau
Gasol is a good player, but the Celtics top two are better than the Lakers top two. Same for the top 3, 4, and 5. Gasol gets credit for a good game, but fortunately for us Celtics fans, the playoff format is best of seven.
Very gracious and on the mark post, Steve. Happy holidays to all.
by VtCeltics on
Dec 26, 2008 3:19 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Now we are giving credit to a Laker? what's next,"MVP!" chants towards Kobe?
Let’s get this straight: the national media and the announcers have a bias against the Celtics, and for LA and Lebron. think I am wrong? Who picked Boston to win the titel last year before the season started?? How about how many media folks and analysts picked the Celtics to beat detroit? after that series how many picked Boston over LA? after we beat la, how many picked us to win it this year???can you see my veins bulging? GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD, the FAKERS deserve NOTHING! NOTHING!
Ask yourself this question: How many titles have the la lakers won without wilt, kareem or shaq??How many, you can do it?! Now, how did the Fakers get those players?? did they draft them? Now back to our celtics, did we draft Bill Russell? How about dave cowens did we draft him? Hey how about bird did we draft him? Havlicek??
The fakers are a franchise that the NBA needs for the purposes of its league to be financially successful. The league has manufactured trades, kareem, wilt and Shaq, that the powers that be have known had to occur and the fakers have benefitted. they might as well be the NBC FAKERS BASKETBALL TEAM. they have little or NO connection to the community and it shows at their games. meanwhile the celtics had to outwit, outlast and outplay everyone to be where they are. NO ONE else deserves any credit, yet, for forming a dynasty under the conditions that the CELTICS have. And the league may have loved how we got Garnett, but it took two men who bleed Celtic green to get us KG, and it took an underarted superstar, Paul Pierce, a man who has gone uncredited for DOMINATING KOBE over his entire career, to all get the job done.
WE deserve credit. WE do. LA sucks and they are an example of ALL that s bad about sports. We are an example of all that is good. PERIOD.
by wahz on
Dec 26, 2008 4:04 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
in the finals last year i had to watch bill russell and kevin garnett yuck it up on a halftime cheese fest as if they’d been born celtics. russell mighta been but kg was given to the c’s for pack of gum. the lakers have been shrewd and always competitive. the celtics wasted at least the 10 years previous to latest title with bad picks and a bad product. i love la cuz they are good, and even when they dip a little they work to get back on top. people wanted kupchaks head 18 months ago, but all of a sudden his moves are working. bynum really limited c’s inside game, ariza outran everybody twice, odom got after it and hit 2 gorgeous 3’s, even walton and the machine got into the act. through and through the lakers are better franchise. more exciting product, more versatile players, more drama, more highlights. all celtics have is kgs big mouth.
by only1in22yrs? on
Dec 27, 2008 4:44 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hmmmmmmmm
Actually we won 5 without Wilt, Kareem, or Shaq. How many did you win without Russell, Cousy, or Bird? As for the rest of your post there is nothing substantial to respond to.
by pslakerfan on
Dec 26, 2008 4:15 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The LA lakers won 5 without wilt, kareem or shaq. what years were those?
by wahz on
Dec 26, 2008 4:42 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The Lakers did win 5 without Wilt, Kareem and Shaq, when they had Mikan. So?
Oh and the Celtics have won 3 without Bird, Russell or Cousy. Seriously, why is it hard for people to look this stuff up?
by RebusRankin on
Dec 26, 2008 5:04 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow.
Wahz,
You can’t be serious with that rant. If you want to talk about the league “needs” the “fakers” to be good, then mention how your team struggled for the ENTIRE PP era (losing record 6 of 9 years), then got lucky with 2 trades for 2 players who also were failures as leaders of their own teams. Al Jefferson could bled all the green he wants, but he is a good role player at best, no Hall of Famer KG is.
Most of the Lakers were drafted by the Lakers and were the same guys picked to finish 7th, 8th or 9th by so called experts for 3 years in a row, including last year. They were good before the Pau trade, and even better after. Those who weren’t, like LO and Vlad, were there for 3 years during the struggles. Sasha, Luke, Bynum, Farmar, Kobe, and Fish. All Laker draftees. They were built form the ground up.
What manufacturing for the Lakers? What conditions did the Celtics endure to ‘build" a Championship team? Having McHale give you a gift? You had two Hall of Famers drop into your lap after your worst season ever. It worked out, and it’s going to cost McHale his job.
Also, please don’t knock the Lakers banners. 11 of the Celtics banners came in a no free agency era 6-8 team league.
How about Magic? Did they draft him? How about Kobe? Did they draft him? How about James Worthy? Did they draft him? Byron Scott? Need I say more?
Paul Pierce isn’t underrated. he had 6 losing seasons in 9 years. KG and Ray made him a HOF. I don’t think his # should’ve been retired in Boston before this past June.
I don’t mean here to start trouble or anything, but be realistic.
by wondahbap on
Dec 26, 2008 6:09 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Why
Wondahbap, I agree with everything you said except “I don’t mean to be here to start trouble”, of course you are, you became a member of Celtics Blog for what reason ? Why do you act suprise when someone disagrees with you, I mean you are bashing the celtics on their own blog, its pretty funny actually, you want them to agree with you crowing the lakers the best franchise ever? “Please don’t knock the Lakers banners” You just knocked all their banners and they are Celtics fans, of course they are going to knock all the lakers banners, thats what a rivalry is all about. Like I said at the start I agree with everything you said, but this is Celtics Blog, its not like they are attacking the lakers on Lakers Blog.
by Champzilla on
Dec 26, 2008 7:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Saying idiotic things no matter what blog is cause for ridicule
Saying the league orchestrates the success of the Lakers is idiotic, has no factual basis, and is meant to start a Laker/Celtic hatefest in the threads.
Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on
Dec 26, 2008 8:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What ???
When did I ever say “league orchestrates the succes of the Lakers”, why are you making stuff up? Don’t ever call my posts idiotic because you don’t know me and that is highly uncalled for, have some respect. Read my post again, you are falsely accussing me, I don’t appreciate that.
by Champzilla on
Dec 27, 2008 1:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Champzilla, I don't think Ozzie was directing that toward you
Could be wrong, but I think his reply was meant in regards to an earlier comment on this thread. Just wanted to clarify.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Dec 27, 2008 2:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Laker Nation
I love how there are more laker fans on celtics blog than there are celtic fans.
by Champzilla on
Dec 26, 2008 6:32 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's the only thing Celtics/Lakers fans have in common
Celtics fans are obsessed with the C’s.
Lakers fans are obsessed with the C’s.
by cordobes on
Dec 26, 2008 7:07 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually
It was the Celtic fans on our blog that brought me here. You may be half right. I don’t really want to start trouble, but pretty much, it is. There’s no hard feelings. Nothing wrong with a little ribbing. You have a team you should be proud of. We’re proud of ours. We want what you took last year. It’ll be a fun season.
by wondahbap on
Dec 26, 2008 7:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
I agree wondahbap, hey I like when the laker fans come on here and chat, I think its fun, there is nothing better than Lakers – Celtics, but I was just wondering why you were getting upset because they weren’t agreeing with you, thats all. They are the 2 best franchises in the NBA, its a fun rivalry.
by Champzilla on
Dec 26, 2008 7:24 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wondahbap,
Actually you traded for Kobe and Scott. Way to know your own history.
On your current team, you traded for Gasol, Odom, Ariza, Kobe and Mihm. You signed Radmnovic, Fisher, Mbenga. You drafted Farmer, Bynum, Sasha and Walton. Not exactly how you stated things is it?
by RebusRankin on
Dec 26, 2008 7:38 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Why does this matter?
You’re not gonna find any team out there nowadays that was all just “home grown” draft picks. It doesn’t matter anyway, in the NBA great GMs build a team any way they can, through drafts, trades and free agent signings. Whoever started this above was making a horrible argument or really, really reaching for a reason to hate one of these two teams. Let’s not perpetuate it by trying to argue one side or the other. What matters is if the team is good, not whether the team drafted the players.
by WildYams on
Dec 26, 2008 7:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know the history
But they were Lakers from the start. Didn’t wear other unis to start. Trading for Kobe doesn’t count like the rest of them. Mihm only get garbage time, so i didn’t include him. fish was drafted by the Lakers left for 2-3 years, came back. He’s a Laker. I said LO was traded for, and Pau. I know Ariza was traded for. Did I mention him? If you read it, I said we had guys who were on the team when we were “struggling” (struggling for a laker team, that is). So if you re-read my comments, you’ll see.
Oh, by the way, I wasn’t mad at all. Not at all. Is that how that came out?
by wondahbap on
Dec 26, 2008 10:58 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
First 33 minutes of action Pau Gasol scored 13 points on 4-11 shooting and pulled down 3 rebounds, and had numerous defensive lapses. If Pau had of shown up for the first 45 minutes of the game the Lakers would have won by 10-15 points …. but he did play extremely well in final three minutes.
Impressive finish by Pau after not being involved for most of the match. It’s hard to come in cold like that and make all the big plays anyway.
by Who on
Dec 26, 2008 10:03 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Fair assessment, Who
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Dec 27, 2008 12:34 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs

















