Let's Talk TA

A Daily Babble Production
We're just a shade more than two months into Tony Allen's tenure in his new role as the Celtics' primary wing off the bench. Thanks to some recent forum threads, an insightful fanpost from our own nickagneta, some internal reflection on my opening night piece about him and a few particularly pointed comments made by The Guru as of late, TA is on my mind today. Time to roll out some early-season evaluations with 50 regular season games remaining.
The more I watch Tony Allen play in 2008-09, the more convinced I become of the validity of the assessment The Guru made some weeks ago: Tony is a stronger player from a physical standpoint than he was a season ago, but his continued struggles with the mental aspects of the game still limit his progress.
When I praised Tony's play back on opening night, I focused the piece on what can be best described as the "No-no-yes!" plays of that evening. These were the plays where Allen looked completely out of control and seemed to be headed for a bad shot or a charge but somehow managed to force the ball into the basket or perhaps even draw a foul. In the opener against Cleveland, an abnormally high percentage of those plays that started "No-no..." ended happily. In general, it's been fair to expect those plays to work with more regularity than they did a season ago, simply because he is healthier than he was last year. His explosiveness may never return to the level it was once at, but his knee is clearly less of a restriction than it was in 2007-08.
Allen is really the only slasher off the Celtics' bench right now, and he is producing at a higher level than he did last year. His field-goal percentage has jumped back to 47.4 percent from a career low 43.6 a season ago. He is averaging 8.1 points per game and 14.6 points per 36 minutes, both the second best figures of his career. TA is attacking the basket hard and getting better lift than he was a season ago, thus allowing him to finish more around the rim. His increased comfort jumping and moving laterally has aided him similarly at the defensive end, where he has been helpful in stretches for the Celtics this season.
Allen is clearly a better player than he was a season ago, primarily because of his increased health. That's good. But a season ago, he ranked somewhere between eighth and twelfth man on this team. He is now the first or second man off the bench, which means that the standards are higher and that it might not be enough for him to simply be better than he was a season ago. And that's where the mental part of the game kicks in as a limitation.
TA's physical talents allow him to do some very good stuff on a basketball court. He has the quickness and leaping ability to get to the basket and to earn trips to the foul line. Those same attributes as well as his boundless energy can help him toward becoming a lockdown defensive player. Playing hard is a good start. But playing hard needs to be coupled with playing smart in order for that hustle to be as meaningful as possible.
Tony still isn't doing that. When he goes to the basket, he still settles for simply putting his head down and bulling toward the rim. That's an A-plus for aggressiveness. It really isn't so good as far as other issues such as "seeing the floor," "avoiding offensive fouls," "being ready to make a pass rather than forcing a shot into a double team" and "not turning the ball over" are concerned. He still doesn't seem to keep his head up when he pushes the ball, and it has resulted in his turnover figures being nearly as bad as ever. His three turnovers per 36 minutes are more than any Celtic regular besides Kendrick Perkins (3.1). His turnover percentage indicates that he gives the ball away on approximately 18 plays out of every hundred, worse than only Perkins and Rajon Rondo among Celtics who see the floor with any regularity.
The most frustrating part is that these are avoidable turnovers. Too often, they come as a result of TA over-dribbling or running his way right into a defender because he isn't looking up the floor. As Nick noted recently, he still doesn't space the floor well enough on the fast break, and he still seems far too willing to take the bait and careen directly into defenders who have gotten into the habit of planting in the lane and waiting for him.
As far as the shooting is concerned, Tony deserves credit for the fact that he is going to the rim more than he was last season, taking 62 percent of his shots from inside as opposed to 50 percent a season ago. This is likely a function of confidence in his health allowing him to once again go to the rack without fear. The problem here is that not only has his suspect jump shot not improved, it appears to have regressed. After posting an effective field goal percentage of 41.6 on jumpers a year ago, TA is down to an abominable 26.7 percent eFG on jumpers this season. He is also shooting a career low 71.8 percent from the foul line, which makes his ability to get to the stripe that much less valuable. For all the chatter about the need for Rajon Rondo to put in the work on his shooting mechanics (and there is plenty of need), this is year five for TA, and his jumper has yet to even approach the neighborhood of semi-adequacy.
Defense remains the strongest part of Allen's game. He is holding opposing two-guards to an impressive 46.9 percent effective field goal shooting, and his gambler's instincts make him an ever-present threat to make a steal that starts a fast break and leads to an easy bucket. He is moving more fluidly, and (purely from an anecdotal stand point) he seems to be more consistently putting together several good defensive possessions in a row. But he can still only go short bursts before losing his man away from the ball on consecutive occasions or getting beat on an up-fake or committing a silly foul due to his over-aggressiveness. I can't say it enough: The physical play is great. The defensive desire is great, especially in a league full of guys who can't be bothered. But the overall defensive play could be so much better if he had the ability to focus on the nuances. That's the difference between being a good and a great defender, and Tony has yet to give us the indication that he can make that jump.
I realize that TA is a contentious subject around Celtics fans and that I've likely opened the floodgates to being labeled a card-carrying member of the so-called "TA hater" crowd. I'd like to believe that isn't the case. I see a player with a ton of physical ability, a player who is no doubt to some degree better than he was a season ago. Most importantly, I see a guy who wears a jersey that says "Celtics" on the front, and I'll root for all the best for him for as long as he does (which is why I've spent countless hours talking myself into trying to be a bigger believer of his over the years).
Sure, given the choice between a guy making ill-advised plays that end poorly and the same guy making similarly ill-advised plays that end less poorly because he is more physically capable of executing those plays at a higher success rate, I'll take the latter. But until that player can take the next step toward playing consistently smarter basketball and making better decisions on the court, it will remain difficult to trust that player when a game - or perhaps a playoff series and thus a season - is on the line. I'm far from at that point of trust yet with Tony Allen. And as his role on this team becomes more vital, that's increasingly what this is all about.
1 recs |
67 comments
|
Comments
TA
I basically agree with what you say. I think Tony is a better player since recovering from his injury. I actually think the injury took away some of his athleticism, at least temporarily, and this has forced him to be a smarter player. I think he see’s the floor better, he’s made some outstanding passes and I think he has a better overall understanding of the game. But, I’ve been disappointed by his lack of consistency. Doc has said part of the problem is that TA needs to slow down. His physical speed is ahead of his mental speed sometimes. I don’t think the problem is “mental” as far as understanding goes and making the right plays. I think it’s from lack of focus. Hopefully this will come around. You mention TA as a slasher. As an aside I would say Ray Allen is as effective in going to the basket as TA. He does it in a different way. It’s actually amazing how well Ray can score in the paint because he’s really not fast and he’s not as strong as TA. I don’t know what Ray was like earlier in his career and maybe it’s his experience that allows him to do what he does. Hopefully TA is watching what RA does.
by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 1:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Tony would be a better player if he was coupled on the second unit with a better point guard.
(See the Gabe Pruitt discussion.)
by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 1:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Right, because that will get him wide-open jump shots… Oh, wait…
by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My feeling is that TA will be better having a go-to play with the second unit. Something he can execute with confidence and success, like, for example, a pick and pop with Davis, or a pick and roll with Powe.
The problem is that right now every time he drives it looks like he wants to force the issue all the way to the basket all the time. This is bad, and is the reason why all his plays are of the no-no-yes variety.
by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A Plus Observation on TA
SW
You nailed pretty much what I’ve been seeing in TA. He is playing a bit better but still you start to get nervous when he is in the game in the fourth quarter. I’m still rooting for him, but can he take the next step in his game and reduce turnovers in the fourth quarter? I don’t know-posey could do in the fourth quarter what TA can’t do now.
by fizzyice on Dec 30, 2008 1:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Defense Wins Championships
It’s true that Tony is inconsistent on offense and turnover-prone (as Pierce was until he stopped trying to do everything himself).
But there is nothing inconsistent about Tony’s defense. He’s the best defender on the team after Garnett, and its best perimeter defender. So the haters can spew all they want, but the Celtics are lucky to have him for 2M a year.
by Brickowski on Dec 30, 2008 1:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nah, people only say “Defense wins Championships” because there are only a few teams who are really good on defense. A lot of things win championships: defense, rebounding, passing, shooting, but for whatever reason (GM´s who want to put people in the seats, stat whoring players, incredible offensive players as opponents ) there are not a lot of really good defensive players in the league. It´s also harder to recognize a good defensive player, since he depends on his teammates (or who would´ve thought that Ray Allen could defend prior to last season?) and most D-stats are misleading (steals, blocks).
Tony Allen still makes a lot of mistakes on offense, and is still wildly inconsistent. Consistency and flawless play win Championships, too.
by Casperian on Dec 30, 2008 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the mention....
and for another outstanding article. The forums, as just about anyone who frequents them knows can be quite the contentious place when the subject of TA is approached and the reason is because most won’t do what you did in this article Steve. You are able to both praise his accomplishments and also identify his weaknesses. Too often that combination doesn’t occur in the forums as we try to make a point. I must admit, I am guilty of just such a thing.
So the objectivity you brought to this subject is not only well done but much needed.
I will admit to be a card carrying member of the “TA Detractor” crowd(Hater is such a negative word). But just about everything I don’t like about Tony’s game is centered squarely between his ears and not anywhere else. He is a physical specimen who is capable of extraordinary basketball feats. But his lack of a disciplined mental accumen kills everything those physical tools bring to the table.
I am an owner of a business and was a production manager of multimillion dollar manufacturing areas. I have a love for things and people who work smart as intelligent production is always less expensive and more efficient than products that are manufactured “the hard way”. Tony’s game is a seriously bothers those parts of me that see him as a collosal waste of talent because he doesn’t use his brain as well as he does his physical attributes. For these reasons I will never like Tony’s game.
But he is a Celtic and I will cheer for him and hope and pray that he can bring yet another title to Boston with the contributions he does provide and hope that the coaches and manager will maximize his contributions by utilizing him properly, knowing specifically when to use him and when it’s time to sit him and use someone else.
by nickagneta on Dec 30, 2008 1:44 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Objectivity!
Well said, Nick. SW hit both sides of the argument very well.
Methinks this debate won’t end until the season’s over….
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Dec 30, 2008 2:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The obvious solution
Is for the brain doctor to perform a transplant. Think the Couz is willing? Perhaps Nash wants to know how it feels to have Tony’s remaining spring? We could at least get a brain from Adam Morrison . . . or Tyler Hansbrough?
Just a really random thought.
by Thruthelookingglass on Dec 30, 2008 11:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
TA's only problem is.....
he’s playing out of position. He’s being asked to play the point when he’s not a point. The 2nd unit needs a reliable backup point….not Eddie either. Tony is a SF/SG.
by kefa461 on Dec 30, 2008 1:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this comment.
Why is he playing back up point minutes when we have a back up point?
by teaguelife on Dec 30, 2008 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If you think TA has been playing PG this year...
Then you haven’t been watching this years games. This is absolutely not true. Doc and Danny realized early last year that having TA play the PG spot was a horrible idea. The lack of basketball IQ mentioned above and agreed upon by all is a very bad combination with the floor general spot. They have to make great decisions the high majority of the time, and TA is not that player.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
82games backs up EJ's comment about his roles this season
They have TA playing 34% of the team’s total minutes at the two, 4% at the three and less than 1% a the point.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Dec 30, 2008 2:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When Tony is on the court with House, (or anybody other than Rondo) it’s pretty negligible as to who’s playing the point. Whoever gets the inbounds pass is playing the point when those two are in the game. I don’t buy the 1. Tony handles the ball from the beginning of the play way more often than 1 when he’s in the game. I am anything but a Tony hater. But I see the amount of time Tony has the ball in his hands as being a problem offensively.
The reality is the only time anybody can tell who’s playing the point for us is when Rondo is playing. Otherwise, it’s by committee. Tony is a much bigger part of that committee than 1%.
Tony has issues and is probably not a 6th man. But we’re a 28-4 team. I don’t know how much one improves on that,. I’m glad he’s a Celtic.
Excellent and thorough article, Professor.
by Finkelskyhook on Dec 30, 2008 2:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's all well and good but...
When people say TA’s playing the point, they mean he’s playing defacto point guard, doing point guard things like creating for others and bringing the ball the court, which TA does a good deal of when Eddie’s ‘playing’ point…Ray and Paul also get a lot of time at ‘defacto’ point guard because of Eddie’s shortcomings, yet I’m pretty sure 82games doesn’t count that as ‘playing point guard’ either. It’s all about what other players are forced into doing because Eddie can’t play point….TA’s forced into more dishing and driving situations, which lead to more missed shots and turnovers, Eddie’s forced to chuck more jumpers off-the-dribble (he’s much better at standstill shooting) because there’s no flow to the offense, Baby’s forced into more jumpers at the end of the shot clock because of the lack of ball movement, and Leon languishes in the post waiting for passes that never come. The whole 2nd team is compromised by the lack of a point guard.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Dec 30, 2008 2:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw KG bring the ball up the floor the other night...
…after a rebound when Rondo was blanketed. I think KG would be more effective if Doc stopped playing KG at the point.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
KG At The Point
I’m glad you missed it in the recent past when Perk “played the point”. I’ve also seen BBD play point. I don’t know if you’re kidding here or not, but I very much doubt that Doc wants KG to bring the ball up.
by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 8:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was kidding of course!
It cracks me up how less informed people who obviously don’t watch more than a few minutes of a game here and there throw out a definite like TA is playing the point this year. That is so totally false it blows me away. They see a team trap a pg a couple times in a game where TA gets handed the ball to bring it over half court and suddenly he is a pg. Of course they are thinking of early last year and pre-injury where they did indeed attempt to get him to play point and was a total failure. There are many times when they trap Rondo and PP or Ray or even KG or Perk bring it up but that doesn’t mean they are PG’s and it doesn’t excuse deficiencies at their own positions because Doc is asking them to play out of position.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 9:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Salmon and Mashed Potatoes
I think Tony just needs more seafood and starch
and I think he needs to rip off other people’s headbands and black out more
but no more useless career-threatening dunks after the whistle please
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 2:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
There was a poll on Blazersedge yesterday
which dealt with whether or not fans rooted against one of their own players.
I wonder if there are Celtic fans who root against Allen. He seems like a player who people will either love or hate.
by Cablinasian on Dec 30, 2008 2:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Funny you mention this Cablinasian,
TA was exactly the player I was thinking of when I commented asking tominhawaii if I could rip the poll off for CelticsBlog use.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Dec 30, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
link?
anyone got a link to that? I might have to post that kind of poll tomorrow
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm
not quite what I expected, but interesting
maybe “who is your least favorite Celtic?”
but then everyone would vote for Scal or O’Bryant or Sam
I’ll have to toy with some different ideas
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe “who is our most tradable player”?
Scal and the notorious POB would fall off the list.
by Casperian on Dec 30, 2008 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gabe, etc.
Gabe Pruitt is:
- A MUCH better shooter than Tony Allen. (Actually, TA is not a shooter at all, so that’s not saying much.)
- As aggressive and energetic an individual defender as TA.
- A much better overall defender than TA, because he doesn’t RUN INTO PEOPLE and get called for those fouls in EVERY game like TA, and because Gabe is smart and TA is not.
- A much better ball handler than TA (TA loses the ball for a turnover at least once per game, on average).
- As tall as TA.
- Also pretty athletic. (You saw that dunk.)
- Calm and in control.
When either Rondo or Ray needs to sit down, Pruitt should be going in. He’s a natural point guard with a great outside shot. Hell, TA couldn’t hit a 3 if his life depended on it… and GP is shooting like Ray out there.
So, uhh… why is GP sitting on the bench and TA playing so many minutes?
On the assumption that Doc knows what he’s doing, I have a theory. The Celts may be trying to burnish TA’s numbers in preparation for a trade. Hope that’s the case anyway, because TA is currently on the wrong team. He seems like a nice enough guy, and he tries hard and all, but he is not going to grow any more brain cells and the few he has aren’t working right.
Btw, Patrick O. has shown us some good things lately, especially on defense but also on offense. Ferrchissakes tho, somebody PLEASE TEACH HIM HOW TO SET A PICK. I mean, give me 15 minutes and I’ll explain it to him. YOU CAN’T MOVE INTO GUYS WHEN SETTING A PICK. Got that?! He gets called on at least one of those every single time he plays. (Oh yeah, and quit trying to make hero passes. As Doc says, just play solid basketball ya big fruitcake.)
by DRJ1 on Dec 30, 2008 2:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
not sure how you can claim gabe is a better defender then TA
when TA is asked to guard some of the premier swing men in this league (Kobe, Lebron) and Gabe has never guarded anyone but garbage time players and point guards.
by WillyBeamin on Dec 30, 2008 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
TA + young talent (Walker, Giddens, or Baby) + Scal’s salary may be the bait Danny is hoping to use to swing a trade. The question is, what’s out there that can be had for that price, and is it any better than what’s currently on the C’s bench?
by Section301 on Dec 30, 2008 2:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with everything except...
Gabe being a better defender than TA is. I think a year or two from now he can be close enough to not be a big difference, but right now TA is a bit better. Gabe plays more fundamental defense though and that is why this can improve dramatically. I would personally put Gabe in against lesser teams for quite a few to see if he can build some confidence. Then throw him out to the big boys. If he handles it well, TA should sit.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A Little Agreement
I don’t think Gabe is a better defender, but he is a better shooter, passer, ball handler etc. I would prefer to see Gabe, House, Tony, and two bigs on the court than have Tony play the two. Part of the problem for Gabe is that he usually starts very passive. He’s usually better in the second half. The reason for this I think is simply he needs some minutes to gain confidence and then he can contribute immediately.
Also, and of course this is all anecdotal, but it seems that Gabe’s defense is improving. In college, he was a pretty good defender within the passing lanes. He still does that, but his man to man defense has certainly improved.
I’d like to see the second unit be more energy intensive, pressing, running, and harassing. I think this also would help Tony a bit. Does anyone have numbers on him when Paul is the fifth guy with the second unit versus Ray? I would think Tony’s numbers would be better with Ray as the lone starter, but that’s just a guess.
by amenhotep04 on Dec 30, 2008 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
improving passer, needs to improve TEAM defense
i’ve noticed lately Tony is making excellent touch passes around the rim, and i’ve been hopeful it’s an indication of better decisions to come. I still feel he gambles too much on d, leaving him out of position on occasion. his talents are obvious but the guy is cable of taking 1 to 2 charges a game at least.
by ssspence on Dec 30, 2008 2:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Really an excellent article on Tony´s status quo as a player, sw, as far as the amateur on this side of the internet can tell. Very balanced take on this subject and you nailed every important point, imo.
I particularly like this quote:
Playing hard is a good start. But playing hard needs to be coupled with playing smart in order for that hustle to be as meaningful as possible.
by Casperian on Dec 30, 2008 2:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
TA is what he is...
He is a very athletic player who was once a freakishly athletic player. His injuries have brought him closer to the average NBA player, but he is still gifted that way. He plays very good defense, although he tends to over run the play most of the time but gets away with it due to the mentioned athleticism. He has a great first step to the basket, but tends to have his head down most of the time which forces him into committing a charge or turning the ball over when the opening he thought was there wasn’t. Some players like Ray Allen have the ability to adjust to what the defense does naturally which is why he is so smooth and can finish in traffic easily. TA is a player who makes a move and expects it to work. If it doesn’t he gets in trouble and turns it over. Sometimes his athleticism allows him to finish it off anyway.
TA is what he is. A really good 9-10th player on a championship team. An under-skilled 6th man. If we had a couple guys on that unit better than him it would help. I do think we have that in Powe, but TA won’t give him the rock!
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 3:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Tony is a dumb player at all. He never misses a defensive rotation— which is something that Powe does with some frequency. Tony is also unselfish and a good passer.
Tony’s problem is that his brain gets ahead of his body when he’s trying to do things with the ball. He’s like the football receiver who tries to turn and run before he’s actually caught the pass.
by Brickowski on Dec 30, 2008 3:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good passer?!
That’s why he has an assist to turnover ratio in the minus. 1.2 assists pg in 20 minutes, especially where he has the ball so much with the ability to drive and kick?! The guy is no where near a good passer. I wouldn’t even give him average. When you get the ball and your only thought is to drive to the rim to score, how does that qualify as unselfish? Just pass it into the post once please TA!!
I do agree completely with the second half of that. Perfect analogy!
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 6:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Second The Motion
I totally agree. I tried to say in an above post what you did in your 2nd paragraph, but you stated it so much clearer. I also said above that Doc was working with TA to slow down a bit. When he does do that he doesn’t turn the ball over.
by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 8:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
when I first read the title...
I thought it said “Lets Talk LA” and I thought “oh boy, here we go again” – then I saw the pic of Tony and it all made sense
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 3:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If seeing the pic of Tony helped clear it up for you, Jeff,
then I’ll presume we have Green17 to thank for providing the visuals. Thanks and good lookin’ out as always, G17.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Dec 30, 2008 4:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
just keeping it fair and balanced SW….but yes I loved that smiley TA pic.
When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"
by Green17 on Dec 30, 2008 9:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i like tony because he gives it his all. he also wears his heart on his sleeve which makes him look more vulnerable than he is. get ray to coach him how to shoot the j. he is as we all know a limited second teamer but he is not the problem on this team. we need length.
by nazzbo on Dec 30, 2008 5:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Put me out there then!
I guarantee you that I would give it more effort than any of these guys for the veteran minimum. In fact, give me half of it per year. That doesn’t mean that I have the skill set to make the team better.
Giving it your all means spending your offseason working on your deficiencies. It means sitting in front of tapes of your games isolating issues you have and mistakes you make so that you can correct them. Perk is an example of giving it your all. KG is an example of giving it your all. Bird was an example of giving your all. TA is not an example of giving it your all, rather a guy who thinks his athleticism is good enough to carry him through his career.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That said, EJ,
there is still a major distinction to be drawn between a guy like TA (plays hard, doesn’t get it mentally, hasn’t gone the whole distance to make himself the best he can be a la KG) and the Tim Thomases of the world (athletically talented guys who just don’t seem to care). I think there’s more grey area here than you’re giving credit for.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on Dec 30, 2008 6:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No question
I am not saying that he is the complete other end of the spectrum, but when someone makes a statement like that about how much heart he has and how hard he works, it makes me laugh. The guy gets paid huge bucks to do a job most of us would do for free. He has no responsibilities other than to work on his game for 8 more years and if he does and is moderately smart with his money will never have to work again, and he puts no extra effort into it. Bare minimum to get by, but he gets heralded as this amazing effort guy. He is a lot closer to Tim Thomas than Bird or KG.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 6:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think anybody can question Tony’s work ethic with the speed he came back from the surgery and his willingness to play hurt. Playing for a contract or not, Tony came back from his surgery and tried to play through that huge brace a lot quicker than most coming off that kind of surgery.
by iowa plowboy on Dec 30, 2008 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I just did...
Good to hear from you plowboy! I hope all is well… Glad to see you back and posting.
But, I disagree. (imagine that) The recovery from injury is 100% self serving and without it he wouldn’t have made another dime in the nba. That was for his own sake, not necessarily the Celtics. I am stating that TA does just enough to get by. He recovered from injury quickly so that he would have a chance to return to the court before his contract was up so that he could show that he had some ability and would have a chance of catching on somewhere. That’s fine. I would have done the same. I came back from a rotator cuff injury that was supposed to keep me off the court for 6 months and was given a clean bill of health in 4. TA is supposedly nursing an injury that was supposed to put him out for 18 months and we are weeks away from 2 years. I don’t think it was that impressive a recovery. Not really bashing him on this, but it wasn’t like he was out there full bore 10 months later.
What I would not have done though was sit there with a game that was based totally on athleticism and not work on my free throws, my jumper, my ball handling, my decision making through tapes and such which although would benefit me and my monetary success going forward, but would give my teammates the most dependable complete player I could. Some people have the drive to be the best. TA obviously does not. Fortunately his level of play is probably just good enough to keep a low end contract in the NBA for a few more years. If he had worked on all of these things like he should have he probably would be making 2-3 times the amount right now on a 4 year deal instead of what he gets.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 9:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think there are any problems on this team, barring injuries— unless you consider failing to break the all time NBA record for wins in a season to be a problem.
by Brickowski on Dec 30, 2008 5:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
ADD?
Has Tony ever been tested for attention deficiency? Seriously. Every time I watch him, I can’t help but think that a little medication might solve his problems…great athletic talent but you never know when his head is going to suddenly focus on the kid ordering popcorn in the 30th row…
by daveedee36 on Dec 30, 2008 6:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Let’s medicate Tony for a condition that doesn’t exist. There’s a solution.
by iowa plowboy on Dec 30, 2008 8:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
for the sake of argument...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD, often abbreviated as ADHD) is usually considered to be a neurobehavioral developmental disorder. It affects about 3 – 5% of children with symptoms starting before seven years of age. It is characterized by a persistent pattern of impulsiveness and inattention, with or without a component of hyperactivity. ADHD occurs twice as commonly in boys as in girls. ADHD is generally a chronic disorder with 10 to 40% of individuals diagnosed in childhood continuing to meet diagnostic criteria in adulthood. As they mature, adolescents and adults with ADHD are likely to develop coping mechanisms to compensate for their impairment.
The DSM-IV categorizes the symptoms of ADHD into three clusters, referred to as subtypes: (1) Inattentive; (2) hyperactive/impulsive; and (3) combined.
But hey, you’re the plowboy…
by daveedee36 on Dec 30, 2008 8:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
TA still not 100% physically
Tony still has not come back completely from his knee injury. I would say he is in the realm of 80-90% back. Certainly stronger this year than last, but not the incredible athlete who would finish his drives with a hard jam 2/3 of the time, the pre-injury Tony. Some of that may be physical, some mental. Typically it takes a 2-3 years to get back the full explosion, or closer to it, than what we have seen. And this really compromises what tony can do. He also is not shooting the ball as well as he is capable from the outside. I think in another year we will see the best we can hope for. Now is too soon to assess his value long term.
by footey on Dec 30, 2008 6:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oh, puhlease!!
The man is nearly 24 months removed from a surgery that most experts state takes about 18 mmonths to recuperate from. I think Tony’s supporters need to put aside the “he’s still not 100% physically” argument and try to find some other way to justify to themselves why Tony isn’t the player putting up the stats that he did for 16 games in December of 2006 and January of 2007.
There is now nothing wrong physically with this man. His shortcomings are the shortcomings that have been in his game since he first got drafted. Let’s please get past the"he is still injured stuff". It gets old after a while.
by nickagneta on Dec 30, 2008 6:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Very leveled and well-thought article
But until that player can take the next step toward playing consistently smarter basketball and making better decisions on the court, it will remain difficult to trust that player when a game – or perhaps a playoff series and thus a season – is on the line. I’m far from at that point of trust yet with Tony Allen. And as his role on this team becomes more vital, that’s increasingly what this is all about.
And I also think this is the crux of the issue.
by cordobes on Dec 30, 2008 7:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Precisely. You’ve GOT to be able to trust your sixth man in the clutch in the playoffs. HAVE TO.
I am not anywhere near that level of trust with Tony Allen, expecially with the basketball in his hands.
by CoachBo on Dec 30, 2008 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
T Allen is not a problem
Tony has greatly reduced the “bad Tony” moments that we all cringed over last year. He is a unique combination of talents for this team and that is our strength- a mix of talents. He’s not as game smart as Rondo or the shooter of Ray but he defends and slashes very well. His biggest problem was noted by Steve – he draws a lot of fouls (good!) and then misses way too many freebies. Leon seems to have lifted himself out of this problem – watch him – someone has been working with him on freebies. C’mon Tony! A person with large, not too large, hands and nothing to do but practice b-ball all day should make 80%.
nickagneta, you’re kidding right. Tony was playing for the (pick one) Memphis Grizzlies, Sac Kings and Minn TWovles in 12/06-1/07. He could be doing that right now for them. He’s playing fine and if the coaches keep bringing his fragile confidence along the steals/blocks will exceed the dumb TOs.
This team is 28-4. T Allen is first man off bench. He does dumb things on occasion and stands himself out for it by banging his head. But I’m glad he’s on our side.
by Wildblu1 on Dec 30, 2008 7:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
if there is a reduction in bad TA moments it is small. This second unit as a whole is not playing particularly well and we are often winning in spite of them. Not partly because of them like last year when the second squad would extend the lead most of the time, not lose it.
As far as having him on the other team, if he were Powe would have him fouled out in no time. TA would lower his head and hit Powe square in the chest 6 times and it would be over.
No one has said TA has no value at all. It is just what level that is. It is certainly not a 2nd unit leader and a skillset to be a 6th man.
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And that’s what’s wrong with our bench. We’re asking a 9 and a 10 to be a 6 and a 7.
It’ll be a fatal flaw in a seven-gamer against a Cleveland or an LA.
by CoachBo on Dec 30, 2008 7:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well done, Steve.
Tony’s a useful component of a championship bench as a defender.
But he still plays too dumb to be a useful sixth man.
by CoachBo on Dec 30, 2008 7:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Getting Off TA A Bit
There’s been much talk lately about the Cavs being right there with the C’s. I think, barring something unforeseen, that these two teams will meet in the East finals. I think the C’s are still the better team. But LeBron is a scary guy and here is where we will miss Posey. My statement is this: Scals is the best qualified player on the team, at this time, to replace Pose in these games. PP is the best man on man defender of LeBron. He’s the only one who can force LeBron to his left. When he did this last year it was Posey that was often in position to take a charge, force a walk on LeBron, or make him get rid of the ball with his team defense. I think Scals can do this.
by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 8:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
After Paul, you’re right about Scal. But it’s a meaningless excercise. Additionally, I’ve never seen a walk called on the primadonna. Nobody can force him in any direction because he can get anywhere on the court without dribbling or with one dribble and 3-4 steps.
The solution to opposing the primadonna’s team it to take everybody else out of the game. Stern and the officials won’t let anybody guard or shut down the primadonna so you limit his options and let him try to beat you by himself. Tony and Scal, like Posey, represent 6 fouls each that’ll be called when they’re guarding the primadonna whether they commit them or not.
by iowa plowboy on Dec 30, 2008 8:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what happened in games 1+2 last year?
someone pull up the numbers, 12-43 through games 1+2?
by WillyBeamin on Dec 30, 2008 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree completely
If we would get Scal out on the floor on a more regular basis this guy would be the big defender on the 3 position that we need come playoff time. With some additional shots he would also be a dangerous weapon in the corner hitting the 3. (42% from 3 this year) He is fundamentally a VERY sound defender who knows the angles and nuances of defending which most of the time make up for his lack of athleticism. Usually when he makes a mistake or commits a foul it is due to someone else missing an assignment and him trying to cover it late. He is not quick enough to make up distance on a blown play. I would 10x rather trust this guy guarding Lebron over TA. Now let’s have it Scal haters!
by EJPLAYA on Dec 30, 2008 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He is not 100% physically. He does not finish the way he did before. Maybe this is all we are going to get from him, but you cannot deny that he is not finishing the way he was able before the injury.
by footey on Dec 30, 2008 9:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow, alot of TA comments...
My thing with Tony is that I feel he’s being asked to/is trying to do too much. Because the 2nd unit lacks reliable shooters and ball handlers and wing defenders, TA is usually caught trying to do too many things. If he just had to play man-to-man D and take shots when he was open, he’d be fine. But he’s handling the ball, trying to make plays, help defending and trying to get to rim. He’s not Pierce, so he can’t do everything well with any consistency. And if he’s asked to defend a 6’7-6’10 SF, he’s giving up alot of inches.
Is he still recovering from his surgery? Maybe. I’d argue his biggest issue is not having enough help on the 2nd unit. Hopefully Ainge gets that worked out soon.
by LuckyNumber07 on Dec 30, 2008 10:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















