CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


spread the word

Free Gabe!

Pruitt_hill400300_medium

I can't bring myself to outright criticize the decisions of this coaching staff after a Championship and a 28-4 start to the season.  In fact, Doc and company have at least a two year free pass with me.  I mean, it would take a reverse-Spreewell move (Doc choking a player) for me to turn on him at this point.  With that said, I can't help but wonder how much longer it is going to take to give Gabe Pruitt a legitimate run at some more minutes.

For one thing, the guy has paid his dues.  He spent a good portion of last year working the D-League over, learning the pro game and getting a better feel for playing the point at this level.  Then he had an excellent training camp and preseason.  In the limited time he's had this year (mostly in garbage time, so numbers are largely irrelevant) he's looked solid and composed.  He's not spectacular by any means, but he's at least worth looking at more.

You could say that he needs to earn his minutes in practice, but given the C's schedule thus far, there haven't been a lot of practices to earn those minutes in.

There is also some sense of urgency to see what we have. 

Star-divide

Starting January 5th, teams can sign players to 10 day contracts and you might see some guys start to get bought out.  One of those guys might be Stephon Marbury.  You can argue all you like about the merits of bringing him in or avoiding at all costs, but there are rumblings that he is at least interested in the Celtics and you can bet that Danny will at least ponder the concept.

Even if you dismiss the concept of Starbury in green, there are other options that might become available.  The trade deadline is coming in February and the team might face some decisions.  How much value does Gabe offer in a trade?  How much do we need a long term solution at backup PG?

The Celtics are primarily looking for big men, but if a point guard becomes available, is it worth spending the time and energy, not to mention the roster spot to pick someone up?  And don't forget that Player-Coach Sam Cassell is still waiting in the wings if need be.

We want to secure home court advantage, but I don't think we need to shoot for 70 wins.  I'm not saying play Gabe at the expense of wins.  But it would be nice to take a chance on him perhaps at the risk of losing a lead here or there.  It isn't as though the second unit has cemented their roles anyway.

Gabe would seem to fill a number of roles and provides many of the skill-sets that we value on that second unit anyway.  He's not quite the marksman that House is, but he can shoot the ball well from the outside.  He's not the slasher that Tony is, but he can defend both guard positions (especially 2nd unit guys).  He's not the creator that Rondo is, but he can bring the ball up and get us into our offense.

He doesn't have to take House's job or Tony's job.  He can spell both of them and maybe give Rondo and Ray a little extra rest.  At least it would be nice to see if he's up to the challenge.  He's been getting a little bit of non-garbage-time here and there, but I'd like to see Doc let him run a little longer while the game is still in doubt.

Tonight seems like a good opportunity with Portland (potentially) missing Brandon Roy and the Celtics rotation guys a little weary from a West Coast road trip.

Like I said, whatever Doc has been doing with the rotations has worked to the tune of a 28-4 record.  So it ain't broke and it probably don't need fixin'.  However, if we want the rotations to be healthy headed into the playoffs and see what kind of depth we have at the guard position, it would be wise to let Gabe play.

0 recs | Comment 57 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from CelticsBlog

Steph May Be Done Here

Jul 2009 by Jeff Clark - 57 comments

Taking Stock of a Wild July 1

Jul 2009 by Jeff Clark - 36 comments

Ainge Has A List

Jun 2009 by Jeff Clark - 31 comments

Kidd In Play? (and Other Rumors)

Jun 2009 by Jeff Clark - 48 comments

Team Needs: Backup Point Guard

Jun 2009 by Jeff Clark - 29 comments

Comments

Display:

It wouldn’t be surprising to see him get a little bit of run here. Assuming they want to add a body, it would be nice to know whether they need to keep Sam around in player mode or whether they need to do something else (waive POB, trade Giddens for a pick, etc.). I do kinda like that Doc’s sticking to a much tighter rotation than in years past, but Gabe’s shown enough in the limited time that he’s been out there to at least intrigue me.

Wasn’t it around this time in his second year that Powe started to get some regular PT? Every situation is different, of course, but it seems like starting to get some regular PT at around the middle of the second year makes some sense. Don’t force him into action before he’s ready, but get him some experience now in case either House or- GASP! – Rondo were to get hurt. With the amount of hits that Rondo seems to absorb, having our backup PGs prepped to step in when called upon would seem to be a priority.

by theBird on Dec 30, 2008 8:45 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gabe won’t play in the playoffs unless its a blowout, even then, probably not.
Gabe is a below average talent and alot of celtics fans are coming off as homers screaming for him to play…Maybe get him some minutes to boost his trade value, because im positive doc isnt about to give him significant minutes late in the season even if he played perfect in the action he sees

by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 30, 2008 8:46 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t think he’s a below average talent at all. The only thing holding him back is that he’s a tweaner. He’s a great athlete with quick hands on defense, and he’s got a beautiful stroke. At worst, he should have an Eddie House type career.

by moiso on Dec 30, 2008 8:53 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not A Tweaner

I think Gabe is a point guard who can shoot the three, but does not look to shoot it. I think the only way we can judge Gabe’s true ability is to play him with the starters in place of Rondo and see how good he is at this stage at running the offense and setting up other players for their shots. With that said, I don’t think it’s an experiment worth running unless it’s decided that Rajon needs a day off. I think he (Gave) is a true pg. I think Eddie is a 2 guard.

by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 8:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Marbury fits

Danny got Ricky,begged for Iverson, so Starbury fits his style…TA& Ray have begun to handle more as Eddie slides over to the 2 spot ..and even Starbury plays better defense than Eddie,I think?…our defense in fine,even in losses,it’s getting bogged down/TO’s that kill us…more hoops by 2nd unit will get better floor balance and less runouts=better defense….Starbury will take care of 90% of what we need and a tall person with long arms handles the last 10% aka Smith,Deke,PJ…add those 2 pieces and 18 is a given

by Motown on Dec 30, 2008 8:54 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hmmm...

Everyone wrote Rajon off last year even before the season started. Giving Pruitt a chance to play will give him confidence and also allow him to contribute. Eddie House is money most of the time, but if he plays 2 rather 1, his offense will help the team a lot more.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 9:06 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I guess I can understand why doc wouldnt want a 22 yr old backing up another 22 yr old…kinda young at the PG position

by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 30, 2008 9:09 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

he can't be

much worse than House. I like Eddie but Gabe is probably a better defender and it might be a wash on offense (can’t really tell yet). Eddie is a specialist (though not Kapono-like) whereas Pruitt can be better in more areas.

That said, the time to tinker is when LeBron twists his ankle and the Cavs go on a nice skid.

by reggie35 on Dec 30, 2008 9:31 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Roy is not playing?

Is that a sure thing? What about Oden?

by cordobes on Dec 30, 2008 9:46 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

sorry, I read that wrong

fixed to include qualifier

Roy is questionable for tonight (last I read)

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 9:56 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know Eddie always thinks his next shot is going in… he’s a shooter. But on those nights when his shot is not falling, I’d give Gabe a try, at least a few minutes, because if Eddie’s shot isn’t falling, he’s not providing much out there.

What I like most about Gabe from what I’ve seen is that he can really move his feet and stay in front of guys. He’s really good at it. That, and he can knock down the open jumper. Always a plus. I’m for giving him a few extra minutes here and there in other than garbage time just to see what we’ve got. Right now, we just can’t say. Initial impressions are that he’s House-like in not being a true PG, so I don’t know how well he will be able to initiate offense. I do love the kid’s defense though.

Play defense… hit an open 3. It’s a start at least.

by Mencius on Dec 30, 2008 9:50 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This ain't no big mystery.

For a backup for Rondo, Pruitt is a better ball-handler and defender (with the possible exception of Tony Allen) than any other guard on the team. That, and the fact that he has a good outside shot are the reasons he should be the backup point guard. And heck yes, he should be the backup during the playoffs.

by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 10:00 AM EST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Overstating much? The jury is still out on whether Pruitt can provide as much defense as Ray Allen and Eddie House.

by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 10:58 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t think I’m overstating anything here, though I certainly have that tendency. But I’ve intently watched Pruitt’s defense, particularly his footwork in cutting off penetrations, and would take him over Ray Allen or House as a defensive player. Have you noticed how few silly hand-checking fouls he makes? It’s because he’s excellent at moving his feet and staying balanced.

And I can’t see anyone arguing the comparative ball-handling between him and House.

by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 11:41 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here’s another observation. Have you noticed how many times our backup bigs pick up offensive fouls for moving on picks? Often this is because House and Tony Allen take their first step a fraction too soon before their teammate is sufficiently set in the eyes of the ref. Pruitt doesn’t seem to make this mistake, probably because he’s more confident in his dribbling skills. He also avoids the traveling calls because he’s staying low and getting the ball down quickly.

These are examples where Pruitt contributes by keeping something from happening (a moving pick, an opponent’s penetration, a reach-in foul, or a travel). Sure, it doesn’t show up on the stat sheet, but that’s how winning basketball is played.

by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 12:16 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am amazed to hear you managed to see all that in the two games when Pruitt wasn’t playing against third-string players. I’m not even sure most of it was there to see.

As far as I am concerned, the only progress I’ve seen with Pruitt is that he no longer looks completely lost on the court. Doc played him as the backup PG for 2 games. You know why he stopped? Because it didn’t seem to make our second unit any better.

From what I’ve seen for the short minutes he’s been out there, Pruitt is essentially a 6’5 Eddie House. With the added bonus of rookie treatment by the referees.

Oh, and the reason why our bigs pick up offensive fouls is because they keep leaning sideways into the player they’re setting the pick on to make sure contact is initiated. Every single big on our team does that, and it is surprising we haven’t gotten called for more OFs. But then again, judging by how travels and palming violations are officiated in the NBA…

by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 1:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Everyone has their own timewasters. One of mine is to closely scrutinize the form of certain new players. So yes, perhaps I’ve observed things you haven’t. And no, I don’t believe Pruitt is simply a 6’5 Eddie House.

As for the moving picks, yes, often it’s entirely the fault of the Celtic big, being overly anxious to make contact with the defender. But as I wrote before, very often it’s the fault of ball-handler moving too soon. A third reason, is that the dribbler doesn’t come close enough to rub by the pick, so the pick moves out, trying to get the defender. From what I’ve observed, Tony Allen and House, are quite a bit worse at this than Pruitt.

by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 3:36 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gabe

I think Gabe is a long-term keeper for the C’s. I think, right now, Doc is putting him into situations where he can succeed in order to build up his confidence. Gabe is a quiet guy and Doc wants him to be more vocal and become a floor leader. To do this, Gabe needs to feel confident in his own game first. I think we’ll gradually see Gabe get more and more playing time in the second half of the season, especially as we approach the playoffs. Right now PP and Ray are playing with the second unit. Those minutes will gradually be turned over to Gabe. Gabe looks good to us fans, but we don’t know what goes on behind the scenes and none of us know him as well as Doc does. I said at the beginning that Gabe is a long-termer. His real importance will be in future years and I don’t know if he can develop to the point of where he can be a factor in the playoffs. I think Gabe has the skills and the “fire” to be a player.

by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 10:19 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think Doc is very sensitive to disrupting the rotation. That has been him MO for a long time. As Jeff indicated, Pruitt has done very well in almost every chance he has been given. He is a great 3 point shooter, he plays very good defense, can bring the ball up confortably. His one weakness, is his personality. He seems content just to blend in, and not take the ball over. That is due to his inexerience, and deference to the vets. That will change with time. There are moments when he wants to take it to the hole, he does with ease. He reminds me a great deal of Devin Harris. I think Pruitt was a fantastic pick by Danny. What a shock.

by footey on Dec 30, 2008 10:19 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Free Eddie House

When House was playing (or not playing) for Pat Riley, Riley’s daughter had a T-shirt that said “Free Eddie House”. Just thought I’d throw this in for no reason at all except that I remembered it.

by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 10:21 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

we can’t say gabe is below or above average in talent because he hasn’t had the chance to play. doc has to give him time. depth depth depth makes you a winner.gabe is an athlete and i apologize for repetition, reminds me of gerald henderson.

by nazzbo on Dec 30, 2008 10:34 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Leave it to Doc

Jeff, this seems like the first off -sync article you have written. I don’t disagree with it. However, we have to consider a couple of things, you mentioned a good training camp. That gave Doc a long good look at what he might get from Gabe, I can only think that Doc would not give Eddie House the backup ball handling chores if he did not HAVE to.

Secondly, The article suggests (at least to me) that the team should lighten up a bit and give the guy a chance. I don’t think this team has it in them to “lighten up a bit”. I blame his lack of playing time (partly) to the fact that this team is VERY FOCUSED. Too focused? Maybe. It seems like allocated time for developing a youngster is very low right now. They are just focused on winning games. Silver lining? If Gabe is able to crack the rotation at some point this year (for reasons other than injury), you know we have a heck of a player.

by afflatus on Dec 30, 2008 10:43 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think they are being cautious with their lineup and don’t want to risk giving time to an unproven commodity

my point is that they need to see what they have with the kid

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 10:51 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pruitt is Ready

They’ve already seen what they have in this kid: an NBA-quality combo guard. He’s already better than House in every category except 3-point shooting and experience.

I’d really like to see Gabe get 15-20 minutes for 2-3 games in a row.

by Brickowski on Dec 30, 2008 10:57 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m with you, Jeff. I would love to see Pruitt play more meaningful minutes, just to see if he can contribute as part of a Championship team. Now that we are a Championship Team, it is understandably harder than ever to get minutes. That’s the old “if it ain’t broke” syndrome (which I ascribe to) with exceptions…and this is an exception. If Pruitt can’t handle it this year, he may still be high enough on the “prospective” list to add weight to a trade scenario. At the very least he gets more experience playing with All Stars and remains one of our players of the future. Hopefully Pruitt has developed chemistry with other Celtics players and has learned the system, so that is two big Checks in his favor over bringing in someone from outside the organization.

by thirstyboots18 on Dec 30, 2008 10:58 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let’s play Pruitt, just to see whether we can lose some games and the home court advantage — what an excellent idea! Applying this logic with Gerald Green certainly transformed him into a future All-Star.

by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 11:00 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What is more to your liking? Not play him and have him turn into a Chauncy Billips for some other team? We have to find out what we have. Rondo was the starting pg for a championship team at the tender age of 21…Pruit is an old man of 22, LOL. As I said before, I think we can win a championship with the team we have as constituted now, but if Pruitt would improve it, we wouldn’t have to go outside for pg help later…I don’t think a possible extra loss changes that. Just my opinion.

by thirstyboots18 on Dec 30, 2008 3:04 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Frankly

I’m not happy with Doc’s playing of 5 guys off the bench for 5+minutes in 2nd quarters. Winning a championship is great, but it doesn’t change history. Doc has a long history of not seeing what he has in young guys and strange rotation behavior. His love fest with BBD at the expense of Powe has been a real problem for both the team and Powe.

Pruitt at PG makes us a bit bigger on D something we can clearly use, if trader Danny is to make a move, House might be the most useful guy to teams needing a 3 point shooter.

by Brendan on Dec 30, 2008 10:59 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Can't Trade Eddie

I don’t think we can afford to trade House. Next to Ray he’s the best 3 point shooter on the team. There are times when we need to spread the floor, such as when our opponent plays off Rajon, and Eddie is the best option to put in for Rajon in those situations. With Eddie and Ray on the floor together two defenders are taken out of the team defense. I also like it when Doc plays a complete 5 man 2nd unit. It improves their chemistry. With PP or Ray in with the second unit, they are not utilized as well as they are with the first. I’d rather see them get some rest on the bench. In preseason the 2nd unit often beat the 1st unit in practice. The 2nd unit was terrific against Sac and I believe that with the proper focus they can be consistent game to game. They can play well. The problem is lack of consistency, especially on the defensive end. We also need to remember that opponents are changing rotations so that many of their starters are playing against our 2nd unit. Even if we lose a lead in those situations it could be an advantage for us in the fourth quarter (assuming that we make them (the opponent) work).

As to your comment of “His love fest with BBD at the expense of Powe”, I think you’re reading this wrong. Doc knows what Powe can do. He and Powe have talked about what Powe needs to do to improve his game and I have no doubt that Powe can improve. BBD is still a bit of an unknown. Because of our lack of size he could be very important to us in the playoffs. BBD is still in a development stage and is behind Powe in his total understanding of his role and of the game. Also, as the trade deadline approaches a decision needs to be made about BBD (who is a free agent at the end of this year). We’ve lost 4 games and I don’t think we can blame any loss completely on BBD. So I see no problem in what Doc is doing. It’s a win win situation for the team. If BBD gets better we win. If BBD shows he won’t get better we can consider trading him at the trade deadline if necessary. It will also affect what Danny decides to do if BBD is still on the team at the end of the year. I’m in favor of BBD being here. I think he’s shown he can be a good smart player. I also think we still need a PJ Brown type and we may need to lose BBD or Powe to get that player. My guess is that both will be here next year and another player will go if we can get the Big we need.

by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 8:50 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not happy with Doc’s playing of 5 guys off the bench for 5+minutes in 2nd quarters.

You are happy, though, when the starters return fresh and close out the other team, no? That has happened multiple times this season.

by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 11:01 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

…and it takes great performances from single players to win a close game? Because some of our wins this season can be categorized as “lucky”. The bench is blowing up lead after lead, and the starters have to come back and spend more energy in a close game than they just saved on the bench.

Leon needs to play more with the starting 5, for example. Last year, he profited a lot from the double-teams for the three amigos. This year, he`s the leader of the bench squad, plays much less with the starters, and his performances are not as good as last year.

Last season, they could switch KG for Leon, and we still had a good team on the court. Than they gave Pierce and Ray some rest, brought KG and Posey in and we still had a good team on the court. We were a dangerous team for almost 48 minutes, now this number dropped to 40. These 8 minutes per game where we play a whole bench squad are always killing our momentum and build the other team up, imo.

by Casperian on Dec 30, 2008 11:55 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

…and it takes great performances from single players to win a close game?

No. However, getting a great performance from your best players usually helps. And our best players are in the starting five.

by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 1:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’d be happy if the lead stayed big. I think (and I’ll admit its my amateur opinion) that a better utilization of his players would lead to better players playing more important minutes and better overall offensive numbers.

If we’re talking about getting ready for the playoffs, then Powe should be playing as a small C next to KG and as a PF next to Perk with Rondo or Pierce on the floor. That’s how he should be used in the playoffs. If you use BBD as KP’s backup and Powe as KGs you basically limit Powe’s minutes and the amount of time he’ll play with a starting caliber big man. It stunts his growth.

As for Pruitt I’m very much NOT sold that he’s a solution – but I’d like to find out- and if Doc can take chances in games by playing the entire bench together during the 2nd quarter, he certainly can get Pruitt more burn so the C’s know what they need.

by Brendan on Dec 30, 2008 12:56 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

13 to the Rafters

Great hands, great penetration ability, quick feet, great vision in the half court and open court, unselfish, feels comfortable with the offense flowing through him, finds the open man, good perimeter defender, quick hands forces a lot of turnovers, developing jump shot but we have seen him consistently hit open shots, big dunk Sunday night against Sacramento had KG going nuts, great attitude ALL the time, great fit for this team.

The bench looks great when it flows through Gabe

Take note of TA on fast breaks, Eddie House has been missing him consistently streaming down the sideline and TA is getting frustrated, it will be a recurring issue is my guess. Gabe solves that problem, multiple times this season he has sensed this and gotten TA immediately involved on the next possession (usually off of a missed House three point attempt).

I’ve been huge on Gabe for a long time now. Great job Jeff Clark, keep it up guys.

by khaddad on Dec 30, 2008 11:04 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Celtics System and Pruitt/Eddie; Also O'Bryant

I wouldn’t say Pruitt is better than Eddie House on all but 3 pt shooting. Nor would I say the offense flows well through Pruitt. That is what he hasn’t shown yet.
Eddie is a hustle defender. Pruitt is a natural defender. Not sure what is better across all situations. Eddie doesn’t get traded because this is still a game of putting ball in hole and he is a rare shooter. He is also a glue guy, as was Posey, and Danny isn’t going to get rid of both. This team has the intangible of TEAM which can’t be sacrificed for a little “length” be it at PG or Center. I mean, mentions of Marbury are ludicrous. We are blogging about a real team not a fantasy team.
I do like Pruitt though and agree that he needs to see more time but the system seems geared to giving him that in the next few weeks.
I feel O’Bryant is on the same track. Very long, not a clumsy big, not Celtic-ready yet, not 22 yrs old yet. If we had to lose O’Bryant to get Mutombo I wouldn’t do it. If you can slide Mutombo (or others) in somehow where you hold onto the youth assets so much the better.

by Wildblu1 on Dec 30, 2008 11:22 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What is odd to me...

…is that Pruitt played very well in the game against Philly right before Christmas, had been playing ~10 minutes a game for a couple of weeks, and then was promptly benched for the games against the Lakers and Golden State. So the “Doc doesn’t want to rock the boat” argument makes little sense: he did alter the rotations, by not playing Pruitt. Especially against Golden State, the 2nd night of a back-to-back, you’d figure the team could have used Pruitt’s energy and defense (and offense: House plays so much better when he doesn’t start each possession with the ball in his hands. Against GS, House shot 3-10 with no assists; he shot 1-5 against the Lakers). Of course the Golden State game was also the night Doc took Powe out of the game early in the 3rd quarter when he got his 4th foul, after he had played very well offensively and defensively in the first half, and then never put him back in again even as the lead slipped away and victory turned into defeat. Sigh.

by MattD on Dec 30, 2008 11:29 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

An excellent point about the absence of Pruitt from the Laker game.

Doc showed a little loss of nerve by not playing Pruitt in that game.

by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 12:00 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I dont blame him at all

for not playing Gabe in the LA game…it was a playoff type game, and Pruitt will not get any significant minutes in the playoffs as far as I can tell..

by TheAncientRivalry on Dec 30, 2008 12:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doc keeps saying the Celtics need to be better this year if they want to win another title...

… and on this point, Doc’s right. And one way to get better is to improve at the backup point guard spot. I see Pruitt as an upgrade over House at that position. And if you’re going to move in that direction, then Pruitt needs to be getting the minutes, even in the big regular season games. How else would he be properly prepared for the playoffs?

by no kidding on Dec 30, 2008 12:24 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

why do people keep saying this?
Pruitt will not get any significant minutes in the playoffs

How do you know until you see him play extended minutes? A lot could happen between now and the end of the season.

The Powe comparisons are (potentially) pretty good. We didn’t know what we had with that guy till he started grabbing rebounds over guys twice his size.

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Dec 30, 2008 12:27 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, the reason he had been playing in those prior games is that the Celtics had big leads.

by Brickowski on Dec 30, 2008 12:04 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

To a degree...

…but for example in the Philly game, he entered the game at the 10:48 mark of the second quarter with Boston up 8, 33-25; he was in the Chicago game early in the 2nd quarter, with the lead no more than 10 (can’t tell from the play-by-play exactly when he entered). So this isn’t PO’B, human victory cigar territory. Yet we had a 10-point lead going into the 2nd quarter of the Golden State game and he didn’t play then.

I can understand how in the Lakers game, Doc wanted to see how the team as it is currently constituted responded in playoff-type atmospheres with playoff-style shortened rotations. By the player management in the Golden State game was more mystifying.

by MattD on Dec 30, 2008 1:23 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would love to see more Gabe

This bench’s biggest problem is a lack of playmakers. Sometimes Tony Allen is on, but that’s about it and definitely not reliable enough. House is a shooter and nothing else. Big Baby tries to create and it’s usually a disaster. Powe needs someone getting him the ball and he’s been a roller coaster this season. Gabe Pruitt is one of the few guys on the bench that can take a basketball and give me some shred of confidence that he will either score or give one of these other guys (House, Powe, Baby) a solid look to score. The bench goes in lulls because their only consistent option is a contested jumper. Give Gabe the ball and let him show what he can do.

by Big Ticket on Dec 30, 2008 1:14 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right. Except Pruitt isn’t able to create much. That’s why when he was playing those minutes MattD is raving about, he was a spot-up shooter in the corner in our sets. Knocked down a couple of shots, and all of a sudden he played great.

As a matter of fact, House and TA were still bringing up the ball most of the time with Gabe in.

by kozlodoev on Dec 30, 2008 1:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

a fact i attribute

more to House and TA being confused about who should bring it up. Even when House was playing with Rondo the other day he was coming back to bring up the ball.

by Brendan on Dec 30, 2008 1:44 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He doesn't create much...

… but I think he can. He’s been aggressive at time, taking his man off the dribble, attacking the basket… but he doesn’t seem completely comfortable asserting himself like that with this team. He needs to get more exposure and encouragement and then I think he’ll be more apt to be a playmaker.

by Big Ticket on Dec 30, 2008 1:52 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hopefully I'm not "raving"...

The appeal of Pruitt is that he has shown some glimpses — nothing more — of good qualities that could help the team, and so (especially with the struggles we had last year down the stretch at the backup PG position) it’s natural to wonder what level of asset to the team he could develop into given more playing time.

by MattD on Dec 30, 2008 2:40 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Of course he shows glimpses . . . because he gets no legitimate playing time! Doc refuses to play him for more than a couple minutes at a time, therefore all we see are glimpses of what he can do.

by rrc589 on Dec 30, 2008 6:46 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Time is Right

Doc has a history of waiting until Jan./Feb. before he starts playing his 2nd round rookies and 2nd year players (think J. Reed, Gomes, Powe, etc…). To me, I think Doc is trying to establish rotational consistency and so purposely limits the amount of young players in the rotation so as to better ensure such consistency. But, by Jan/Feb, it’s usually time for some kind of tweak to the rotation (or, as Doc tells the media, young player X has begun to earn his minutes in practice) and that’s when we’ll see the likes of Gabe, O’Bryant, or maybe even Walker/Giddens for a couple games in a row to see how they respond….

As for Gabe’s ability, I think he’s a solid NBA player right now, pretty much a better dribbling, better defending, taller version of Eddie House, who can create for himself and for others, shooting well off-the-dribble, and in spot-up situations. Other than pure marksmanship, he’s better than Eddie in everything else.

That said, in no way would I want to replace Eddie with Gabe—a huge part of the 2nd unit’s lack of cohesiveness can be traced to a lack of veterans and moving Eddie out of the rotation would throw all kinds of uncertainty into that unit. So, what I’d do would be to play Pruitt at 1, Eddie at 2, TA at 3, and try (especially against the lesser teams) to go minutes at a time without one of the Big 3 bridging things between the 1st and 2nd units.

What really irks me, though, is when we’ve seen the Pruitt/Ed/TA lineup during garbage time, Eddie is often still running the point and Gabe is just sitting the corner waiting for the ball to be swung his way (as noted by kozlodoev above)…that’s such a huge waste of the kid’s talent, not to mention the loss of developmental time at a position (backup point guard) this team dearly needs to upgrade.

by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Dec 30, 2008 1:44 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gabe, TA, et al

Gabe Pruitt is:
- A MUCH better shooter than Tony Allen. (Actually, TA is not a shooter at all, so that’s not saying much.)
- As aggressive and energetic an individual defender as TA.
- A much better overall defender than TA, because he doesn’t RUN INTO PEOPLE and get called for those fouls in EVERY game like TA, and because Gabe is smart and TA is not.
- A much better ball handler than TA (TA loses the ball for a turnover at least once per game, on average).
- As tall as TA.
- Also pretty athletic. (You saw that dunk.)
- Calm and in control.

When either Rondo or Ray needs to sit down, Pruitt should be going in. He’s a natural point guard with a great outside shot. Hell, TA couldn’t hit a 3 if his life depended on it… and GP is shooting like Ray out there.

So, uhh… why is GP sitting on the bench and TA playing so many minutes?

On the assumption that Doc knows what he’s doing, I have a theory. The Celts may be trying to burnish TA’s numbers in preparation for a trade. Hope that’s the case anyway, because TA is currently on the wrong team. He seems like a nice enough guy, and he tries hard and all, but he is not going to grow any more brain cells and the few he has aren’t working right.

Btw, Patrick O. has shown us some good things lately, especially on defense but also on offense. Ferrchissakes tho, somebody PLEASE TEACH HIM HOW TO SET A PICK. I mean, give me 15 minutes and I’ll explain it to him. YOU CAN’T MOVE INTO GUYS WHEN SETTING A PICK. Got that?! He gets called on at least one of those every single time he plays. (Oh yeah, and quit trying to make hero passes. As Doc says, just play solid basketball ya big fruitcake.)

by DRJ1 on Dec 30, 2008 2:22 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Part of the Plan?

Maybe Danny knows this kid is good. Maybe he has a trade or a couple of different scenarios lined up. Gabe was playing great in the preseason and now not at all. Big Baby is getting more minutes than Powe, and Scal is playing instead of Bill Walker. I think the Celtics are showcasing some trade bait. My idea is that Danny wants to trade a combo of Scal, BBD, and Tony Allen, for a very good wing off the bench.(Gerald Wallace? I wish). But Danny wants to keep Gabe on the bench so teams wont ask about him. Picture this.

Scal,BBD, and TO, I mean TA are gone.

Our wing we traded for would get TA’s minutes.
Pruitt takes a lump of the Scals minutes.
We sign a BIG, I wish it was Mourning but maybe Joe Smith or PJ. They get BBDs minutes. Powe will see a bump in minutes too.
And we call up either Giddens, or Walker as insurance.

I’m all for it. Now just find a sucker, I mean gullible, I mean ……watever. Just find a GM willing to make that trade.

I think it adds athletecism, offense, and more solid DEF

by EatSleepBreatheGreen on Dec 30, 2008 3:32 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I actually kind of like this part of the plan theory only because I can find no other reason why he’s not getting more playing time.

by rrc589 on Dec 30, 2008 6:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe next year...

Danny should trade his draft picks and purchase picks not wanted by other teams. Think Rondo, Powe, Walker.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 7:16 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What A Problem To Have

As shown is this discussion we have so much to comment about Gabe Pruitt on a team that is 28? and 4. Is Gabe good or not? Is he a pg or not? Is Doc playing him enough or not? I bet alot of other teams would love to be having this conversation. Regardless of all this talk I think Gabe is a long-term keeper. He’s shown alot to me in the spare minutes he’s played as a second year player. He seems to have the perfect temperament to be a backup pg (puts his ego in his pocket). He obviously needs more experience, but he is going to be a very good player in this league and hopefully for this team. He also, in this stage of his career, has the good fortune to be on THIS team with these players and with Doc as his mentor.

by TrueGreen on Dec 30, 2008 9:00 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Unleash the Gabe...

now!!!

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 4:22 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Shamrock-blk-trans_small
FanPost 101 - You Be The Blogger

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Trade We Should Make
Small
Is Danny slipping?
Small
The Celtics offseason? My rants.
Small
Boston Celtics
Nba_small
The Rasheed Wallace Effect: Part Boston
Rondojer_small
An open letter to Danny: why you messed up.
Small
less is more
Small
ESPN Ultimate Team Tankings
Small
Springfield Development Team - Springfield Armor
Ruby_7-08_hb_2yrs_old_002__2__small
Celtics To Leon: Business is Business!

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Authors

Picture_1_small Jim Weeks

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Small The Duke33

Parrotface_small dobbs

Po3_small Master Po

Small Jughead

Small CelticBalla32

Small petula

Small hankfinkel

Small Bent

Moderators

300h_small Wide Load

Small CfanMissippi

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Donoghus

Small Chris72

Capt_small redzdeadbabyredzdead

Ud_small indeedproceed

Small thirstyboots18

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports