Report: Cassell to Be Bought Out
From Peter May's Article in the Globe today :
According to a Clippers source, the team will announce today that it is buying out the contract of the 38-year-old guard.
NBA sources indicated that the Celtics, Mavericks, and Nuggets all are prepared to make Cassell an offer once he clear waivers in 48 hours. All three teams have their biannual exceptions available to give to Cassell (a maximum of $1.83 million) while the Mavs have their full mid-level available ($5.356 million) and Denver has $2.356 of its mid-level. The Celtics have spent all of their mid-level.
"It's weird. I've been playing 15 years and this is the first time anything like this has happened to me," Cassell said yesterday morning following the Clippers' shootaround in nearby Manhattan Beach (he didn't play in last night's 104-76 loss to Boston because of a sore right wrist).
"I've been dealing with this for a month and it's going to come to an end soon. Hopefully something positive will come of it. I'll let it rest and hopefully everything will work its way out.
"My agent has been talking to them about it, but until he calls me and tells me to pack my bag, I'm still here."
Hat tip to P2 for grabbing this first and putting it up in the forums
0 recs |
51 comments
Comments
Does Sam have a ring yet? Money might be a factor, but the team with the best chance to win a ring could be the deciding factor. Sam would know which team that would be better than me.
by halfman/halfoyster on Feb 26, 2008 8:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sam has two rings. But he wants more (especially at the end of his career), and out of the 3 other teams interested, we have the best chances to win the title.
by P_two on Feb 26, 2008 8:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Of course Dallas would be interested. There team is never good enough and especially when you have unlimited resources with Mark Cuban. They would throw that 5 mill to Greg Kite if it meant buying a title.
by shadylanes138 on Feb 26, 2008 8:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Reports are that Brent Barry is leaning towards the Suns, which is probably the best fit for both him and the team. Even though Phoenix spanked the C’s last Friday, they are very thin off the bench which should translate into more playing time for Barry.
Cassell might come to Boston due to his relationship with Garnett, though he reportedly would have the chance to start over Carter in Denver. Since the Nuggets play very little defense, he would fit right in with that group.
by lemonadesky on Feb 26, 2008 8:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sam has a ring with the Rockets I believe…thanks to Hakeem & Co.
They should make a push for this guy, he couldn’t hurt…could he?
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 8:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I won’t believe this until it’s a done deal. Donald Sterling is the flakiest owner in the NBA so I put no stock in any rumors involving the Clippers.
by Red2 on Feb 26, 2008 8:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
If this happens, it seems we could offer the least amount of money and the certainly not the biggest role. However I think we have a better chance of getting to the finals than the others if only based on the fact that 1) we have the best record and 2) we are in the East.
by GreenBalls on Feb 26, 2008 8:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Detroit has been playing out of their shoes lately.
In a 7-game series with them (if it came to the), the Celtics would need ALL the help they can get…Cassell would be invaluable in that regard.
Absolutely.
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 8:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i am very ambivalent about sam and my heart would not be broken if we don’t pick him up. the problem has been that we have seemingly waited for him endlessly and we are at the mercy of sterling , sam, and the other bidders. somehow he reminds me of payton- big ego at the end of the line. however payton was useful to miami and it would be ok for sam to be useful to us in the same way.
by nazzbo on Feb 26, 2008 8:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
38 year old PG!!!!!!!!!!!! who we are not sure is willing to play a back-up role!!!!!, who is right now is “supposedly” out injured (isn’t this twice alread this season)!!!!!, who could not stay in front of Rondo last time we played to save his ugly soul (he looked terrible)!!!!!!, who then smacked Rondo upside the head with a dirty cheap foul done purely out of fustration because he looked bad!!!!!!! (so much for that level headed veteran PG comPOsure presence needed in the playoffs).
Yeah I get it – we should get Cassell because he is friends with KG and he used to be pretty good. Great logic. Why don’t we see if World B Free is available as well, or maybe prop up Artis Gilmore like Weekend at Bernie’s for our big man or ……maybe Pollard can help wrap up Sam’s sore wrist and they can hold hands on the bench. ughhhhhh
by Master Po on Feb 26, 2008 9:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I feel the same way, Bazzbo. Aside from the potential ego issues, the gollum doesn’t play much defense any more. Good clutch free throw shooter, though, so that might be useful in the playoffs. But all things considered I’d rather see Reggie Miller come out of retirement or go a little harder after Brent Barry (although Barry seems destined to return to SA).
I’m happy to stand pat. IMHO Gabe Pruitt looked pretty good last night, and I’d like to see him get some of House’s minutes between now and the playoffs.
Since Pollard has shown himself to be useless for anything other than locker room comic relief, I think adding another 7-footer should be the first priority. Dale Davis anyone?
by Brickowski on Feb 26, 2008 9:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I still think we need a backup PG. Sure we are a little thin at big man and who wouldn’t want another decent 7 footer, but the reality is that between Baby, Powe and Scals we have some depth there and could likely continue to win (for reference see last stretch of wins without Garnett). Without Rondo – we can’t even get the ball up the floor reliably, the offense stagnates, the good opposing PG torches us. Even barring an injury to Rondo (and you have to consider that possibility considering the way he plays) he is a second year player with an occasional letdown and cannot be on the floor for the entire game. Cassell is the best available player for the position of greatest need on this team IMO.
by GreenBalls on Feb 26, 2008 9:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dale Davis anyone?
I read that he is close to signing with the Pistons.
by soap07 on Feb 26, 2008 9:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Do the celtics have a 08 draft pick? A rumor has been swirling that Spygate(Rams taping occurred) Moss might sign with Dallas. The time has come for the Pats to start rebuilding I suppose.
by richardlight86 on Feb 26, 2008 9:36 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i would prefer brent barry over cassell…more fuel in the tank…and am sure he would gladly play backup to rondo…
hope we can still convince him though
:)
by celtpinoy on Feb 26, 2008 9:36 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think a back-up Center is more important than a back-up PG. Perkins is more likely to go down than Rondo. KG is already fighting an injury. Big Baby, Powe and Scal are not Centers. It’s a little unreasonable to ask these guys to defend and rebound against other Centers in the playoffs.
I’m ok with House as back-up PG and would like to see Pruitt log some minutes as the season closes out.
by DJ to Bird on Feb 26, 2008 9:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Although Cassell is older, slower and doesn’t play much defense, we really need a solid backup PG with playoff experience. If Rondo gets hurt or in foul trouble, this team will be in rough shape getting the ball over half court with any kind of full court press by the opposition. Ray Allen and Pierce can help get it up but no one can start the offense like a true PG and House is not an answer. There really aren’t many choices available and anyone with even a decent set of skills will be considered by everyone in the West since that will be such a close race through then end of the season and playoffs. Cassell seems like the only respectable PG remaining that could actually help us in the playoffs. I will go so far as to say this NEEDS to happen as an insurance policy for the C’s.
by DJ RYB on Feb 26, 2008 9:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
We’ve already seen what happens when Rondo is injured…and it isn’t pretty.
Honestly, I think this is a must move.
Sure, Sam is old…and has some issues.
But he’s also experienced and very talented as well.
He could be the key between #17 this year and not.
Back-up, shmack up…
I say sign Sam, have him split minutes with RONDO, sit HOUSE unless we need someone to jack 3’s…and have Pruitt watch film (or tape the other team’s huddles).
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 10:06 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
He may be bad defensively, but he’s really not any worse than House is at keeping guys in front of him.
by soap07 on Feb 26, 2008 10:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Also, he’d make Rondo tougher by clotheslining him in practice.
by soap07 on Feb 26, 2008 10:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Although Cassell is older, slower and doesn’t play much defense, we really need a solid backup PG with playoff experience.
————————-.
How does those qualifications make him a solid backup?
It makes Cassell Gary Payton with slightly more in the tank.
Rivers can’t handle a personality whom he wants in a supporting role but who still thinks he’s a great player.
by iowa plowboy on Feb 26, 2008 10:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Let’s not look too close at him not being able to guard Rondo. Not many in this league can. He made the Nuggets guards look like they were standing still. He makes a lot of guys look like they can’t play D.
by Bleedgreen on Feb 26, 2008 11:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Come on, back up PG is the difference between making it to the finals and and losing in the conference finals. Sam I Am can still play and would help bolster the C’s biggest weakness, which was apparent when the season began. This move would be a no brainer IMO. Of course, he’d still have to come to the C’s.
by droopdog7 on Feb 26, 2008 11:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Po is dead on with this one. No way I want him on this squad. We are doing just fine with House bringing the ball up the floor. House gives you Sam’s scoring, but Sam can’t play D. House is really putting the effort in on that side of the ball. Why bring in a disrupter if all he can do is bring the ball up a little better than House. Sign another big stiff or leave it alone. I like what we have. We need to play better together, not change our pieces. Last night showed that they are getting back into a bit of a groove.
by EJPLAYA on Feb 26, 2008 12:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
EJPLAYA is exactly right. Cassell can bring the ball up the floor…big deal. Our backcourt bench already provides offense (House and T. Allen). Cassell can’t play defense to save his life. Honestly, look at the starting and back-up PG’s of the potential playoff teams in the East. You want him guarding Calderon/Ford or Gibson/Hughes or Nelson/Arroyo? He’ll get torched.
by DJ to Bird on Feb 26, 2008 12:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Come on, back up PG is the difference between making it to the finals and and losing in the conference finals. Sam I Am can still play and would help bolster the C’s biggest weakness
I agree that the move could be the difference between playing in May and playing in June. The most glaring need is still a defensive center who can provide consistency off the bench. BBD is still just a rookie. Powe is a solid role-player. Pollard remains gimpy. Scal is not a center unless we’re playing small ball which is rarely optimal.
by BleedinGreen417 on Feb 26, 2008 12:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
nazzbo said:
i am very ambivalent about sam
Same here
There’s a lot of good things that Sam will bring to the table but there’s a lot of bad too. Could be great, could be a non-event, could be negative …. I really can’t tell.
I wasn’t a fan of the Eddie House signing but he’s played very well throughout the season. I also like what Tony Allen is bringing to the table. Sam Cassell is going to kick at least one of those guys out of the rotation. I’m worried about his effect on the rotation.
I’m also worried about his D which has been very poor this season. I think the Clipps have been at their best when Brevin Knight was in the game because he played defense and pushed the basketball … that was the difference and it had a big effect on the Clipps performances.
I’m not sure whether he’s a good signing. Then again I’m not sure he’s not a good signing. On the bright side he’s a good ballhandler, an excellent floor general, a good scorer, a clutch player, one of the finest leaders in the league, a good passer and I think he’ll make sure KG takes some more shots.
Lot of good. Lot of bad. I can’t tell how it would play out. I’m really not sure what to make of his possible addition.
by Who on Feb 26, 2008 12:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cassell would be coming off the bench and/or splitting minutes with RONDO.
Rondo would be the starter.
It wouldn’t be a bad signing at all, and I think it’d help.
EJPLAYA said:
Last night showed that they are getting back into a bit of a groove.
—
Let’s see what WEDNESDAY night brings…IF they get a win, THEN I’ll say they’ve got their groove back…until then, last night showed nothing to me.
Denver, Golden State, Phoenix…Loss, Loss, Loss…that shows something.
Sam would help. Period.
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 1:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I´m a bit shocked, to be honest.
House can bring the ball up? Nope, sorry, he can`t.
Do I have to remind you that we probably play Detroit in the ECF, and what happened the last time we played them? As much as I love Rondo, I don´t feel comfortable with him as our only PG in a 7-game-series against Detroit. What if he gets injured, or gets in early foul trouble against Billups? We definitly need a backup PG, and looking through the available names, Sam is by far the best possible choice, imo.
Or does this sudden aversion come from the fact that he fouled Rondo last month? Come on, even Rondo was cool with it. The rumors about Cassell to Boston last since the start of the season. Of course he played hard against the Celtics. That was a sign of professionalism, imo, and a statement to all the Clippers Fans who were suspicious about his real feelings for the Organization. We should be glad if we could sign such a professional and experienced player.
by Casperian on Feb 26, 2008 1:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Casperian said:
Do I have to remind you that we probably play Detroit in the ECF, and what happened the last time we played them?
Uh, the last time we played the Pistons we beat them (on their court). Billups was held to 17 points and 6 assists, just below his season’s average.
by DJ to Bird on Feb 26, 2008 1:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
We MUST get him. It is imperative to winning the title.
We have to have him.
by rickyfan3.0... on Feb 26, 2008 1:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is crazy, it’s pretty split down the middle on this issue.
Everyone has nice points either way, I suppose.
I, myself, would sign the guy.
Others prefer to go for it as is.
Glad none of us are making the decision…it’d be a big story if it happens.
And even more eyes would be on the green.
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 1:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
DJ to Bird said
Uh, the last time we played the Pistons we beat them (on their court). Billups was held to 17 points and 6 assists, just below his season’s average
Um, I knew this comment would pop up, but that`s why I mentioned a 7-game-series. Ok, not the last game, but the game before that. Better? But that point is moot. Fact is, in a 7-game-series, the Detroit Pistons have a lot of weapons to exploit our weakness at backup-PG, and if you have the chance to bring a solid vet like Cassell in, who additionally is good friend with our best players, this equates to a no-brainer.
by Casperian on Feb 26, 2008 1:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow… we are all drinking the Rick Pitino kool-aid or what…. all the negativity in this room…….and it stinks LOL
Well I have no problem picking up Sam I AM for being a back-up point guard…… Pruitt is still very young and immature and a Veteran like Sam on the floor for 10-15 min a game could help spell Rondo and allow Eddie to play the off guard without hurting the team
Who else are we going to pick up to help at the point at this stage????
by Ancient Red on Feb 26, 2008 1:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A quote from Sam regarding the C’s in J.A. Adande’s article on ESPN.com today:
“Can I be effective with that team?” Cassell said before the Clippers played Boston Monday night. “I think that team is lacking … Rondo is a great young talent. In the playoffs, it takes more than talent to win playoff basketball games. Leadership means everything. Knowing who to get the ball to, knowing when to run, knowing when to set it up. I have experience.”
Maybe I’m reading too much into his comments, but it sounds like a guy who would expect major minutes – maybe even down the stretch in the 4th quarter. Is everybody happy with this?
by DJ to Bird on Feb 26, 2008 4:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
just what I suspected. He just hammered and knocked the legs out from underneath Rondo again (verbally this time) and isn’t even smart enough to know it. What an old doof. Thanks DJ to Bird …..again I say NO NO NO.
“I have leadership” – saying that usually means you don’t.
by Master Po on Feb 26, 2008 4:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If Cassell showed up here, it’s Doc’s decision when and where to play Cassell.
Also, Cassell’s comment is correct…none of it is a lie or untrue.
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
mcpu40 – What I mean by the “getting back into a groove”, is that for the first time since his return the C’s are playing well again with Garnett. He was taking up space and slowing things down a bit the first few games, which while necessary, caused them to not play as well. Last night he fit right back in. Maybe not 100%, but back to helping out. First time we have blown a team out in a long time!
Posey and House played very well. (especially Posey)
BBD is absolutely awful lately for some reason. TA was his usual turnover prone poor decision making self. He’s a 1 for 5’er (unfortunately so is BBD right now) One out of every 5 games he looks worth keeping.
Excellent balance and way to barely win the rebounding edge last night.
by EJPLAYA on Feb 26, 2008 6:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah EJ, I agree.
KG did look good last night, especially in the 2nd half.
He’s a phenomenal talent and the C’s are lucky to have him on the floor.
That said, I still say tomorrow night will be the biggest test in several games.
Major talent coming to the TD BankNorth Garden in 24 hours. :o
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 7:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
No question! The Clippers aren’t the Cavs and the test wasn’t the same. I think though that this game was the first in awhile that I felt like we were clicking on all cylinders. If we had squeaked out an ugly win against them we might have gotten pasted tomorrow. Instead, we go in with confidence. It will be nice to see DWest. Apparently I didn’t like Wally that much because that doesn’t really interest me…
by EJPLAYA on Feb 26, 2008 7:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’ve agreed many times with Master Po and others.. but this time I would have to disagree…
You need a Cassell… He brings arrogance and a swagger to this team… He’d not a problem child…. and he will put a fire under Rondo in my opinion
I Would also have taken Ron Artest on this team for 1 year…..
It’s great to be nice and but it’s better to play “Bad” sort to speak…
Sam will bring something against the likes of the Spurs, Pistons, Lakers to the game…
I guess we can agree to disagree….. I hope I’m wrong….but He will be an uplifting to this team
by Ancient Red on Feb 26, 2008 7:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Po and the other Cassell stats should look at any other stat besides “age.” The guy is averaging 12.8 ppg on 45.5% shooting in 25 minutes a night, along with 4.7 assists. Those are sterling numbers for a 26 year old PG, never mind one pushing 40.
Give me a cool headed PG who averages a point every 2 minutes and an assist every 5 (and a turnover every 12 minutes), who shoots 89% from the FT line, and has an incredible mid-range shot, any day of the week off the bench. He’d not a Glove defensively, but I’m sure that the good team defense here in Boston can cover whatever damage the other backup PGs might be able to do against him.
Any worries about how he will fit in here are groundless. This team has too strong a personality to be taken down by one man, if Sam decides to be trouble. It is totally illogical to think he’s going to give away money in LA to come here and be a problem, anyways.
I’m a huge Rondo fan, but I love the idea of Sam running the second unit, and helping to create more blowouts, which will save legs for the playoffs. And I’m absolutely giddy about having him on the floor in end of game situations, where he is as cold blooded as they come. Sam, Ray, Paul, Posey and KG should make opposing teams cringe in crunch time.
by TripleOT on Feb 26, 2008 7:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
IMO, the most reasonable concern about sam is how you integrate him into the rotation when everyone’s healthy. does he play 4th quarter closer minutes? whose minutes does he cut into? house’s? TA’s?
however, i think the biggest value he brings is as a safety net. i don’t think we should worry about him overtaking rondo’s usefulness or biting into his development. we should worry about rondo missing time due to injury, suspension, etc. IF he goes down, then we’re starting house or TA, neither of which inspires confidence bringing the ball up. and when the starter, say house, needs to be rested, then you’re relying on TA or ray or paul to bring the ball up, which isn’t ideal. it’s a huge gamble if you just assume rondo will play every minute that the team needs him to the rest of the season. you must have a viable backup plan were he to go down. and while sam is a different kind of PG, he is at least a capable ball-handler, should be strong with team management, and as a bonus, hitting a jumper. you lose something defensively, but he has a more complete offensive game than rondo, so you hope it’s a wash.
i think some of those who are skeptical of sam are afraid he’d stagger rondo’s development because he’d HAVE to play a big role. i think were the celtics to bring him in, it would be under the pretense that he’s there as an insurance plan, not to create a “big four.” he’s also admitted that he’s damaged goods wherever he goes (The Celtics are “getting damaged goods if I do go over there,” Cassell said. “But I’ll be all right.” -from Adande’s espn.com article), so maybe he’d be accepting of a non-starring role.
by hapa17 on Feb 26, 2008 7:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
All of those in favor of Sam answer me this! Who’s minutes is he going to take?
We have a current 2nd unit of House, Posey, Powe, BBD, and either Ray or PP stays in.
Who doesn’t see the floor time?
BTW, I hadn’t seen anyone mention Pruitt’s minutes last night. He really should be the answer here, not a washed up injured old man.
by EJPLAYA on Feb 26, 2008 7:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
@EJPLAYA
Well, I guess he would take the minutes that Rondo leaves for him, which means House`s and Tony`s minutes as a backup PG.
Tony will play when we need a defensive or penetrating wing, and House will play when we need a 3pt shooter. House is a hot/cold shooter. If he`s hot, great, but if he`s cold, he`s useless, and makes our bench even thinner than it already is.
by Casperian on Feb 26, 2008 8:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why the hating on Cassell EJPLAYA?
Just because of the hard foul on Rondo?
To me, it’s not proper.
Sam is neither washed up nor is he an old man.
Jeez, I’m 37…1 year younger than he is.
To answer your question, I think Sam’s minutes would come at the expense of Eddie House…and some of Rondo’s…yes.
But his experience (ESPECIALLY AGAINST THE WESTERN CONFERENCE) would be invaluable in the Celtics’ playoff run THIS year.
I think it’s pretty much a critical signing…but hey, what the heck do I know?
Rondo might (MIGHT) be able to lead the Celtics to the promised land.
Rondo AND Cassell together would have a legitimate shot at it.
by mcpu40 on Feb 26, 2008 8:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Master Po….all your points well taken…. always respect your posts…. but my gut says Sam will help us.
He has spunk & a strong will.
by tommyfan on Feb 26, 2008 8:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’ve been known to be wrong a time or two. 8)
by Master Po on Feb 26, 2008 10:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















