Daily Babble: No Complaints About Mister Bowen Here
Theory: Bruce Bowen's detractors don't really hate Bruce Bowen. They hate that Bruce Bowen isn't on their team.
In the wake of Bowen's most recent incident with an opposing team's star -- this time a tangle-up with the Hornets' Chris Paul, which earned Bowen a one-game suspension for an incident that likely wasn't as much his fault as appeared at first glance -- the "Bowen is the dirtiest player in the league and must be stopped!" sentiment seems to have come across the national media and the general fan populous with greater vengeance than ever before.
Somehow, even though I'm certainly no Spurs fan by any means, I can't seem to get on the anti-Bowen bandwagon. My guess is that it's because I know that given the choice, I would take this guy on my team any day of the week. It is the contention here that most around the league would likely be hard-pressed to say they wouldn't do the same.
All of Steve's daily posts can be found in the CelticsBlog: NBA blog. Check him out!
We have long canonized the antics of those with bigger names and bigger stat-lines under the happy umbrella of 'gamesmanship.'
John Stockton, long known for doing more than anyone's fair share of holding, clutching, grabbing, palming and a variety of other underhanded acts on the floor, has his dirtiness referred to in jest, largely thanks to the fact that he is one of the greatest passers of all-time and ran a beautiful pick-and-roll offense for nearly two decades with Karl Malone. By the midst of his own heyday, the single-minded competitor known as His Airness, Michael Jordan himself, was getting away with anything and everything he wanted to, and he wasn't immune to doing whatever he had to do in order to have his way on the floor, either verbally or physically. Those are just two of the game's many greats whose legends have been long augmented by the tales of tugging shorts, holding jerseys, tapping shooters' elbows and generally following the edict that is "Ref didn't see it, I didn't do it."
It just so happens that guys who are placed on pedestals for this sort of on-court conduct happen to be the ones who had something to offer for everyone who watched them play. Michael Jordan was the best player of his generation, and the magical powers of number 23 -- particularly on the offensive end -- left fans everywhere in awe. The same is true of Stockton's passing and the offensive talents of other stars who have similarly gained praise for their 'gamesmanship.' We might hate that they are getting away with it on the nights that they play against our respective teams, but we are consistently left in awe by the rest of their work, and we know that nearly all the time we watch them. And just in case we didn't, the media and NBA are all too happy to throw that down our throats, because that is what the NBA does these days: It markets stars and high-flying offensive performances.
Bruce Bowen doesn't fall into that category. Perhaps he doesn't engender love from fans around the league because he isn't a star and because his game isn't particularly pretty to watch. Bowen doesn't provide a joy for fans to watch on nights when he isn't playing against their team. He is just a pest who runs around and makes the best player on the opposition crazy every night. He occasionally shoots the corner three, but other than that, the man isn't a scorer and doesn't look to shoot. If the average fan isn't actively watching Bowen instead of the ball, especially on defense (and the average fan probably isn't), more likely than not, the only time he will notice Bowen is when controversy arises.
Bowen is just a man doing everything he can to survive. He works his tail off to do everything he can to hang in and give his team the best chance possible to win, and sometimes he scratches and claws and tugs and holds along the way, perhaps occasionally crossing lines of propriety, perhaps not. He doesn't (to our knowledge) take performance enhancers or do any of what this country's sports-watching populous (and apparently Congress, too) has come to consider 'cheating.' No, Bowen just does everything he can inside the lines to naturally gain himself an advantage, a behavioral pattern that qualifies under our current social structure as craftiness rather than cheating.
In fact, it's odd that this guy isn't the one who inspires love from fans around the country, as his game is the type with which most of us are likely able to identify best. The vast majority of non-basketball players can't dunk a basketball. They can't hang in the air and maintain the power needed to execute an up-and-under reverse lay-up. They can't shoot a basketball with pinpoint accuracy from 25 feet away from the hoop. They can, however, hustle. As a six-one dude with no quickness or jumping ability, it is hard to envision myself looking down on the rim anytime soon. It seems a lot more palatable to see myself sprinting around with everything I have to give and trying to be as much of an obstacle as possible for the opponent, as successfully as I can manage to push myself to be.
In a league full of too many players considered to be coasting along on natural talent alone, Bruce Bowen is the guy whose hard work is his greatest virtue (which isn't to say that he is free of natural basketball skills, just that the ethic stands out above all else). This is the guy who never gives up, who puts out the effort needed to lock down virtually every star in the league on the perimeter. This is the scrappy guy who does the glamor-less work needed to make his team better.
That he happens to be a great teammate and person doesn't hurt either. Off the floor, Bowen is rumored to be one of the nicest and most personable guys in the league. He has been a shining star near the head of the league's charity efforts for several years now, as Bowen works tirelessly to give underprivileged youths the opportunities he didn't have as a youngster. He doesn't run into trouble with the law and doesn't wise off to the media. No, all he does is keep playing hard on the court and working hard off it.
Great defender. Solid guy. Hard worker. Winner. Crafty, dirty or perhaps gamesman-like, depending on one's perspective.
I'll take my chances with this guy.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Nice article, Steve. Much of what you’ve written here applies to a fella by the name of Scalabrine, who many of the writers here seem to take so much pleasure in verbally abusing.
I find it weird that so many of the “white men can’t jump” set get so infatuated with a no production guy like Gerald Green then just hate on guys like Bowen, Scalabrine, etc. Seems like mob mentality to me. Guys who have had solid college careers and have stuck in the pros for 11 and 6 years respectively may not be among the league’s top ten, but they ain’t hamburger either.
I challenge any reader who thinks I’m wrong to accept Scalabrine’s invitation for an offseason Boston road biking group earlier today (see bottom of Bulpett’s “Success Gives Ainge a Different Outlook” Sunday column. My bet’s on the so-called mediocre professional athlete to dust Joe Loudmouth, even in a sport that clearly isn’t his forte.
by LonelyTXCelt on Mar 17, 2008 12:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey LonelyTX,
Interesting perspective — I never would have thought to make the Bowen-Scalabrine comparison (for my part, I’d rather have Bowen any day — he’s a markedly better defender and by all accounts just as good a guy). But thinking about it, I certainly understand where you’re coming from. One way or the other, these guys have all made it to the league (and both have at times played valuable roles on contending teams), and that is an achievement in of itself. You’re absolutely right that sometimes we lose sight of that.
Thanks for making me think about this from a completely different angle.
-sw
P.S. Nice find on Scal and the road biking group. As I’m outside of Boston, I don’t read the local papers as often as I could (although I really should make the time online; there’s just too many good sites out there and only so much time in the day), and I wouldn’t have noticed otherwise. Thanks for pointing it out.
by Steve Weinman on Mar 17, 2008 1:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have no problem with how Bruce Bowen plays, with all the grabbing and clutching… what bothers me is that he sometimes goes overboard and acts all ignorant to the fact; but those who watch him play no better. He often kicks people when they’re down on the floor, he hits people in the balls, among other things. I don’t know, but there’s simply no place in the NBA for this kind of behavior.
Maybe I should remind you guys of some instances, like the time when he kicked Ray Allen among other clearly absurdly dirty plays:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLgHeeOZJFI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc4yz__akIU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdxXvkMB6gA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J2SDouIqtA&feature=related
And those are just a small sample of what he has done through the years.
I love the way he plays defense, but many of the things he does has nothing to do with defense, and at times have injured people with the intent to cause harm. But people forget that because he acts all ignorant and innocent, but a person as smart as he is clearly knows what he’s doing and his actions have no place in the basketball court.
by BudweiserCeltic on Mar 17, 2008 6:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the closest player who could be bowen on the c’s would be tony allen and i would love to see tony emulate bruce. tony has the defensive mind set, the quick feet, and the work ethic. he is a better offensive player than bruce and there’s the rub. he gets carried away with his dribbling or the coaches put too much offensive responsibility onto him. he also has had mega injuries. if he wants to survive in the nba he can dial up bruce as a role model. the dirty tag on bowen- shucks arnold had a bushel of bowens when he coached the c’s and no boston fan was upset.
by nazzbo on Mar 17, 2008 8:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Although it appears that Bowen wasn’t at fault on that play and didn’t deserve a suspension, he’s gotten off plenty of times before where I don’t feel bad that he got it. He’s a dirty player and he’s constantly sticking his feet underneath players during there jump shots in hopes of hurting them. That is simply pathetic and reprehensible.
by CelticsWhat35 on Mar 17, 2008 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BudweiserCeltic pretty much sums up my feelings on this matter to. Good article, but completely missing the fact that Bowen has delivered a flying dropkick to an opponent’s face.
I hustle on the court, but I’m not about to identify myself with someone who steps on a shooter’s shoe before the guy shoots.
I’ll take your argument that he hustles and grabs and what not, but sometimes, Steve, this guy is just plain old disgustingly dirty. Those youtube videos should be a primer. I don’t fault his hustle, but I do fault the cheap shots and the ‘I didn’t do it’ antics afterwards.
by newyorkceltics on Mar 17, 2008 10:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Budweiser, CelticsWhat and newyorkceltics,
Fair points all around. Without question, some of the evidence on the linked clips from Budweiser is fairly damning, and I don’t mean to suggest that I would defend all of that behavior or that I would be a booster of it. Thanks to all of you for bringing that up — as I probably didn’t touch on that aspect of things enough in my column.
That said, my question to you remains this: Given the opportunity to acquire a guy like Bruce Bowen for the C’s (let’s say as a low-cost free agent, because I don’t mean for this to become a debate of trade speculation), would you want him?
For me, the answer is an unquestionable yes, particularly in his earlier years, but likely even now (although players like Posey make a Bowen-type a bit less necessary for this particularly group). But in general, I would want him on ‘my’ team.
Curious to see how you respond.
-sw
by Steve Weinman on Mar 17, 2008 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Would I want him on my team? Sure. But I’m one of those that preffers offensive players that also are capable of defending, even if they’re a bit less skilled defensively than a Bruce Bowen might be. But I see Bruce with two eyes, once appreciates what Bruce does defensively and the other sees all the moronic unsportman-like things he does… it’s simply a matter of reconcilliating the two aspects of his and see if one outweights the other for you.
It’s a comparable situation to that of the Ron Artests, the Rasheeds of the world. Both very skilled on the floor, etc. but you have to give it some thought if you want him on your team because of their antics.
But the good thing about Bruce, is that he’s a apparently a very good teammate… at least I haven’t heard otherwise, so I don’t really see a problem with having him on a team if you want to win. And he does many good things for the community, so it’s not like he’s a bad guy… it’s just that he sometimes does these things that you really don’t know why he did it and there was no reason for him to do them, and they’re often quite bad.
Personally, I like him as a basketball player… but I see no reason to defend him for all the bad things he has done nor to look the other way.
by BudweiserCeltic on Mar 17, 2008 2:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























