Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kentucky Football: Tee Martin Reportedly Leaving for USC

The Billups Layup Play

X's and O's of Basketball has an excellent breakdown of that backbreaking play where the Pistons were able to get a layup when the Celtics desperately needed a stop or foul.

They have diagrams, video, the whole 9 yards.  Check it out. (hat tip to TrueHoop)

Here's a blurb.

As you can see, because O2 (Rip Hamilton) comes off his screen to the 3 point line. This is important because it forces Kevin Garnett to make a decision. Should he switch to cover Chauncey curling off the double stagger? Or switch to cover Rip on the 3-point line? And he has to make the decision in a split second. My philosophy would've been to protect the paint first, so obviously KG made the wrong decision if we use that philosophy. But you could make the case that leaving Rip (who was the leading scorer for the Pistons in the game) open for the 3-pointer would've been wrong.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This just seems like it is KGs fault, he has to recognize that Chauncy’s man is beat and help him out. I mean he didn’t even look, who did he think was going to stop him? Maybe the man on the in-bounds player is supposed to sag and protect the basket, I dunno.

That said, I play mostly pick up basketball games now, but when I play an organized game it is incredible how I have forgotten how to switch on defense. And on screens and pick and rolls between gaurds and big men, switching and playing team defense is critical.

Communication and practice helps, but really it is just a sixth sense which I seemed to have lost.

by Hollywood on May 23, 2008 12:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Pierce was defending the inbounds pass. He didn’t protect the paint. Paul left that whole side wide open for a cutter to exploit. He could have stopped the pass from even being thrown in but didn’t.

by Who on May 23, 2008 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed Who, it was Pierce’s fault he wasn’t protecting the paint. If he had just been protecting the paint the play wouldn’t have worked, well at least to get the layup anyways.

by Scribbles on May 23, 2008 1:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I admit pierce does look guilt afterwards and he should have been closer to the paint but i still think its more KGs fault. The ball could still have been passed nearly under the basket for the bucket, or if pierce sags into the paint, billups could have curled off to the corner for a jumper. That is obviously better, but the point is you have to stop the open man. KG could have done it.

I think its weird that you either see the in-bounds defender either guarding the in-bounder face up, or facing away. Maybe pierce could have guarded the play better if he split the difference and could have seen billups coming.

by Hollywood on May 23, 2008 2:06 PM EDT reply actions  

if KG stops the man cutting because paul didn’t close down the paint, then rip gets a wide open jumper from the top of the key.

Which, in retrosepct, would have been a tougher shot, but at the time, you can’t fault KG for sticking to the play and cutting rip off from a wide open shot.

by crownsy on May 23, 2008 2:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe they practice inbounds plays where the paint is shut off, so KG didnt bite on the cutter because he thinks hes covered. But he seems oblivious to what is happening behind him.

KGs decision comes 2 seconds into the video, billups is wide open 3 seconds in, rip doesnt come off the screen until 4 seconds in, play over.

by Hollywood on May 23, 2008 3:26 PM EDT reply actions  

According to the analysts on NBA TV last night, the play was Pierce’s fault for jumping the inbounds pass towards the 3 point line as opposed to the lane.

Take that for what it’s worth but probably doesn’t matter in the long run. Hopefully they learn from it and lets get on to taking games 3 and 4.

by CelticsPrideKG on May 23, 2008 3:33 PM EDT reply actions  

“My philosophy would’ve been to protect the paint first, so obviously KG made the wrong decision if we use that philosophy”

“My philosophy would’ve been to act like I would have known what I was doing to make KG look like he wasn’t making 20 million more dollars a year than me.”

by bleedingreen on May 23, 2008 10:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Gasol, Deron, or Have Faith In Rondo?
Small
Celtics' vibe
Small
This Team is Complete Garbage
Small
Frustrations..
Small
Rondo and back to backs
Small
Steve Kerr on Rondo's jump shot: "It gets frustrating for the Celtics"
Small
Debunking The "Build around Rondo" Myth
Small
What's up with Phoenix? Is a trade brewing?
Small
Look to Denver
Small
my turn on rondo..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi