Winning Ugly Is Still Winning

That was the shakiest end to a winning basketball game I’ve ever seen. The Celtics held on by the skin of their teeth. Perkins, Garnett, Ray Allen, and at times Rondo carried the team through 3 quarters. But in the fourth, nobody stepped up until Ray Allen hit that long jumper.
This game That one bad turnover (edited for accuracy) will do nothing to help Garnett’s reputation of not stepping up in the clutch. The Pistons upped the pressure and the Celtics couldn’t handle it. The Pistons closed in and the Celtics flat out played scared-to-lose. If it wasn’t for the big lead they built in the 3rd quarter, we would have lost this one.
With that said, they won the game, and that’s all that really matters. There’s no points for style. The Celtics have the 3-2 advantage with two chances to win the series and head to the Finals. Survive and advance, that’s all that matters. There's a name for teams that win ugly, and that name is "winners."
Game 6 is going to be very, very tough. The Pistons will never let up, never back down, never panic. They proved as much tonight. Headed back to the Palace they’re facing elimination and will throw the kitchen sink at us. Now the Celtics have the opportunity to do what they haven’t been able to do all post season long, finish out a series.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jeff,
Sorry but Rondo didn’t carry the team. I just got back and he was bruttle……I swear I was yelling at Doc to YANK him from the game, but as I mentioned at the start, Rondo did not want to pass the ball to Ray who was open. Rondo was forcing to many passes in my opinion. He is beginning to scare me more and more….
The people who claim Garnett isn’t clutch don’t understand the kind of player he is. He isn’t Jordan, Magic, or Bird. He is more like Bill Russell. Russell wasn’t known for making clutch shots, it was for his overall impact on a game. In a must have game 5, KG comes up with 33 points and hits the game sealing free throws. If that’s fueling those who claim he isn’t clutch, they don’t have much of an argument.
I don’t know how the first sentence of the paragraph about the 4th quarter can be that KG wasn’t clutch. I understand that he made the one ill-advised pass that he should have shot.
But other than that he scored 10 of the team’s 24 points, was perfect from the line, and hit both of the clutch free throws that iced the game. I’m not saying the man was a star down the stretch, but it seems unfair to me to call him out about being unclutch in that performance.
Like drza44 said:
he scored 10 of the team’s 24 points, was perfect from the line, and hit both of the clutch free throws that iced the game
Nuff said.
by Bleedgreen on May 28, 2008 11:39 PM EDT reply actions
Rasheed was a non-factor in the 4th. You can be clutch on ‘D’, too.
This game could have turned out a lot differently if it weren’t for Mcdyess’ foul trouble. We really need to do a better job contesting his jumpers in game 6 to pull that one out.
One more thought…Pierce needs to make his offensive move a lot quicker when Rip is crowding him like that. His first step burst will pick up a foul 80% of the time if he is going to play him like that in the post.
by AintEzBeinGreen on May 28, 2008 11:47 PM EDT reply actions
Jeff-
Was this really “winning ugly”? I think harping on the fourth is a little overly-negative. I thought the C’s put together a very nice game especially on offense. Sure they were shaky in the fourth, but you got to give credit to the Pistons for turning up the pressure. The C’s hit the big shots and free throws at the end to hold them off.
I’m really interested in hearing what you guys think about this one, but I REALLY hate the ‘foul to save the 3" strategy. I think it puts too much pressure back on YOU to hit your free throws. For instance, we foul with 8 seconds left, Detroit (best FT team in the playoffs) hits 2, and cut it to one. What happens if we miss one? We are up only two and the three BEATS us. You can’t foul again and give up the tie. Playing solid defense on the perimeter GUARANTEES you OT, and at home, that isn’t always bad (though, one could argue – myself included – that the Pistons were simply outplaying the C’s by this time). If you play solid D and they miss, which odds say they will, then the game is over. You split FTs and are already up 4. Ray and KG go 4-4 to make this point moot, but still…..that was way harder than it needed to be.
by AintEzBeinGreen on May 29, 2008 12:10 AM EDT reply actions
I didn’t like the first foul with about 8 seconds left on the clock. The second foul was a no-brainer IMO and I give Doc credit for implementing that strategy. Many coaches have been burned by going to OT and losing the game there by NOT fouling to prevent the three.
by CelticsPrideKG on May 29, 2008 12:19 AM EDT reply actions
Guys the only issue I have with KG is that if you watch tape, this guy doesn’t miss from the post and rarely misses jumpers so with that said it would be nice to have the ball in his hand more often in the closing moments of any given game. Maybe then these wins wouldn’t be so scary. Agree??
by X Man on May 29, 2008 12:37 AM EDT reply actions
Agreed …but will KG take that shot? Or will he pass it up?
by The Village Idiot on May 29, 2008 12:43 AM EDT reply actions
Things I liked:
1) Perk no doubt played the game of his life. He has actually stepped it up a great deal in the last 3 games. He was a rebounding force on the court and huge on offense and defense.
2) Ray Allen. The shooting arm sleeve! Give him the game ball.
3) Garnett. I know, he didn’t take that open shot late in the 4th and turned it over. But he had 33 points and iced 2 clutch free throws at the end.
Things I didn’t like:
1) Ok, we’ve all reiterated this many times. WHY slow the offense down to a crawl in the 4th when you have a lead?! How predictable is our offense in the 4th? Rondo, dribble the ball until there is about 13 on the shot clock, Garnett, throw a screen for Rondo, Rondo dish it to Pierce or Allen in a double team and then watch the ball get turned over or a poor shot. Why do we forget everything that got us that lead in the 4th? Who’s to blame, Doc or the squad?!
2) Why aren’t we slashing to the basket with Detroit in foul trouble? McDyess fouled out. Sheed has his 5th early in the 4th quarter and is BEGGING for his 6th technical and a suspension. Billups looks sluggish nursing a bad hammy. DRIVE, SLASH, take no prisoners C’s.
I’m mixed on Rondo. He did have some shaky passes down the stretch and couldn’t hit a shot to save his life but he also had good assist numbers and one turnover.
I’m actually hoping some good came from that shakey win. Maybe it shook the C’s up and will make them realize they need to try and close this out in 6 rather than be content taking it back to Boston in 7. We have two shots at this thing…..not sure my nerves can take much more. Go C’s!
by deejaymc on May 29, 2008 12:50 AM EDT reply actions
I thought Kevin had a bad fourth quarter but hey he hit his FTs and the team won. It’s not like anyone else was having a barn buster performance down the stretch.
Pierce started off the fourth in fine form but then had a brain malfunction and stopped doing what was working.
I think anyone had a good fourth quarter, at least on the offensive end, they just grinded it out. Up 15 at one point in the fourth.
rondo is a sophomore in the pro college and is learning on the job- cut the guy some slack. the rest of the guys have to play against a hustling,savvy, physical team that knows how to imprint their will on a game and have been doing it for a whole lotta time-much more than our guys. if we win. detroit helps prepare us for the other guys. if we lose, i will root for detroit. i don’t like them, but i do respect them.






























