May The Better Team Win
I loved Steve Bulpett's article today. Here's a sample:
This is based not on the indisputable truth that the Celtics have a 2-1 series lead, although that certainly tends to help the argument, eh? This is more a qualitative judgment. You see what you see, and it has become clear that if both teams play to their full capabilities, the Celts will prevail.They have a better defense and a stronger inside game and more than enough to counteract the best player in the series, Kobe Bryant. There may have been some serious doubts about the Celts coming into the Finals, and they were not unfounded. They had to sweat out a longer road against lesser foes to even get here, and their two regular-season wins over Los Angles were devalued because they came pre-Pau Gasol.
There was logic to the position that the Lakers would win, and the belief here was that a short series favored the Los Angelenos. A longer series was the Celtics’ amigo.
But now there appears to be no reason why the Bostonians shouldn’t take care of this thing in a less arduous fashion than needed to dispatch Atlanta, Cleveland and Detroit.
That, of course doesn’t mean they will.
I fully believe all of the above. There are a lot of things that could go wrong. Pau and Odom could show up to play. Rondo could be hobbled to the point of ineffectiveness, causing the Lakers to trap us to death. Or perhaps most likely, Kobe could just take over and win it all by himself.
Still, with all things considered, the Celtics simply are the better team. The better team doesn't always win, but they certainly have a better chance at winning. If the Celtics take care of business, they'll be up 3 games to 1 by the end of the night. And that's about all you can hope for as a fan.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We’ll see.
It really wouldn’t surprise me to see the C’s blow this game, too.
by Woodstock Libertarian on Jun 12, 2008 6:12 AM EDT reply actions
It got a bit more complicated with PP/KP/Rondo injuries. If PP can’t regain his lift or lateral movement; if KP can’t dominate the boards; if Rondo lost his speed and quickness….then it is going to be hard closing the Lakers.
In short, we can’t take any possesions off. We don’t have that luxory anymore.
This is the game to win, IMO.
Confidence wise…for the Lakers to tie this series up tonight could be:
a-huge for the lakers
b-devastating for the celtics
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
The Celtics are the better team.
Yeah I agree with what Bulpett is talking about. The Celtics are the better team if they come out and perform at a high level. They just have more about them than LA.
The only question is how often do they do that? And it’s a reasonable question after Atlanta and Cleveland and even to a smaller extent Detroit.
The pace should be in the high 90s for points. Get down the court quickly before LA can set their defense. It gives Pierce a chance to slash 1 on 1 to the hoop. It gives Ray Allen spot up 3s vs a retreating defense and KG can hit the 18 foot trailer
shot. And Perk and Powe can O rebound underneath. The game has to be played with a much quicker pace than in game 3. Bennett Salvatore isn’t reffing tonight which is a good thing.
by Greg37 on Jun 12, 2008 4:28 PM EDT reply actions






























