In Danny We Trust: Draft
The Celtics have the 30th pick in the NBA Draft. Is there any reason to hope that they'll get a decent player that far down? I'll give you a few reasons:
- Kendrick Perkins - #27 in 2003
- Al Jefferson - #15 in 2004
- Delonte West - #24 in 2004
- Tony Allen - #25 in 2004
- Ryan Gomes - # 50 in 2005
- Rajon Rondo - #21 in 2006
- Leon Powe - #49 in 2006
- Gabe Pruitt - #32 in 2007
- Glen "Big Baby" Davis - #35 in 2007
The only notable "misses" that I can think of are Gerald Green (who dropped in our laps after being talked about as a top 3 pick), Marcus Banks (who had all the talent and just couldn't learn to play), and a few 2nd round gambles that didn't pan out (Orien Greene, Justin Reed, Brandon Hunter).
The jury is still out on Gabe Pruitt, but he showed enough promise to be in the conversation at backup point guard next year.
I mean, look at that list! Every player on that list (except maybe Gabe) helped us win the title this year. Some by playing better basketball than their draft position would indicate. Some by developing enough in the past years to become major trade chips that landed us Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen.
I've never heard of most of the guys that will be available in our range, but I'm sure Danny knows them as well as anyone in the league. Clearly we won't find a Kevin Garnett or a Ray Allen that far down in the draft. But who knows? We might find another future trade chip that (packaged with some other pieces) leads to another All Star aquisition. Or maybe we'll just find another hard-working role player that fits perfectly into another title run.
Regardless, I have full faith in Danny Ainge, especially when it comes to the draft.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
One question: Is there something that Danny does differently than other GMs? Does he talk with them and get a feel for their inner drive… seems that would be the guage I would want to see if I could know one thing. Take Gerald Green for example, athleticism running out the ears, but an absolute lack of motivation. On the other hand, Perk had nothing but a real big body and the determination to learn what Clifford Ray and Tom Thibodeux told him. I still don’t think he is getting fair recognition for his defensive play against the pick and roll. But, back to my point, how does anyone interview a job candidate and discern whether they have fire in their belly?
Second point, inspired by Jeff’s previous column praising Doc. Is it time that Doc and his staff start getting some credit for developing young talent? Or do we have to hear it from some self-appointed authority like Stephen A Jackson before we recognize it ourselves?
by LonelyTXCelt on Jun 20, 2008 2:31 PM EDT reply actions
I guess I’d call Gerald Green a ‘miss’ too.
However, I still have a soft spot for him in my heart.
Green did bring the SLAM DUNK CHAMPIONSHIP back to Beantown.
Are there no props for that?
Good luck to him getting back, I have a feeling he will.
One who can fly like that should not be denied playing time on a struggling squad.
High to no picks in the draft is the price of success.
One reason I think Danny has had some success is that the team has put a lot of effort into developing these players. We’ve all had the pleasure of seeing Doc taking the time to play these guys in big games, tell them what they’re doing wrong, encourage them etc to say nothing about the work that they do in practice.
Danny will take someone who loves to play and is willing to put in some hard work.
At 30 the obvious impact makers will be gone.
In addition to drafting very well in the later slots, Danny had the stones to trade Antoine Walker who was not a good influence on Pierce.
by The Real Large James on Jun 20, 2008 3:21 PM EDT reply actions
You know… There are some impact players that come out of the 30 range in the draft. I can think of two major ones right off the top of the all-star list in Gilbert Arenas and Carlos Boozer. There are probably a few more that I just can’t remember. But it is possible. Anything is possible.
Also, I like G.Green. He might pan out in the long run, he just needs to find the right home.
danny doesn’t waste draft picks. some teams give up on their draft picks eventually but danny likes to hold to all the picks he has as possible even 2nd rounders. He tries hard to develop them even if the players themselves are not as motivated and thats what you call great management.
The choice that lands for #30 will be a good one.
Amen on that observation about trading Antoine Walker, Real Large James.
I remember when Ainge was doing game commentary for ABC, and he made it clear he thought Walker’s game was a problem for the Celtics. That’s when I knew I wanted Ainge as a GM, and was so happy when he followed up on his convictions by shipping Walker off.
And for the record, I wonder if a now older, and more mature Orien Greene might not be an excellent backup for Rondo.
How can you call for props for Gerald Green bringing home a dunk trophy after experiencing a year where the manifest importance of sacrificing meaningless personal goals like that was so strongly demonstrated? Pulleeze!
by LonelyTXCelt on Jun 20, 2008 4:33 PM EDT reply actions
Pau Gasol is claiming rowdy Cs fans caught up with the Lakers bus and pounded it with their fists, shouted expletives, and threw rocks at the bus. Gasol then goes on to say threateningly, “I won’t forget that.” Okay, let’s circle the Christmas Day game in our calendars right now!!!
by The Real Large James on Jun 20, 2008 4:52 PM EDT reply actions
Gerald wasn’t a bad draft pick. At the time he excited our fan base, and you HAD to take a flier on him. His “upside potential” still helped us land KG. Let’s not forget that.
Justin Reed was also a pretty good gamble, as he was traded and was thought of as a good defensive player for a while. And how about that Jiri Welsch trade. Danny maxed him out for a 1st round pick … I believe that translated into Delonte or someone like that. Good old Danny Ainge!!
Danny had had some nice picks and obviously did a good job getting the big 3 together. But in 2006 the Celtics could have gotten Brandon Roy or Rudy Gay but decided to trade that pick for Sebastian Telfair. I was really upset when that happened. Maybe I’m being picky. But Overall Danny does a solid job.
by TheShowPowe on Jun 20, 2008 5:08 PM EDT reply actions
This is out of context, but it’s KG and RA on Letterman after the win: http://youtube.com/watch?v=rm3JNH6HCtY
C’mon, ShowPowe. You can’t talk about the Telfair trade without mentioning the fact that you dumped off an extra year of exorbitant of salary with Raef LaFrentz in exchange for Theo Ratliff. Without Ratliff’s expiring contract, you don’t get Garnett in the next off-season. Besides, there was still a chance, in June of ’06, that Telfair might have been able to be decent point guard.
I thing GG and Banks were good picks all things considered. No doubting GG’s abilities: he scored twenty in a few games as a rookie or sophmore, right? He was well understood to be a project coming into the Celtics, and a decent gamble when you realize the C’s were taking home run cuts. Banks is similar, but at the same time he showed enough to get a bad a contract. But again he was a home run swing: a guy who could have put it all together to become Rondo with a jump shot. Being a good drafter doesn’t mean you don’t take risks, it means you understand the risks you are taking.
Unless someone falls to number 30 the Celtics will probably trade it for a veteran player, point guard or power forward/center. The 60th pick will be someone probably from across the globe. Unrestricted players Duhon, Pietrus, Lue, Ollie etc. Bigs Prezec, Magloire, Nesterovic, Diop who knows? I hope PJ, Posey and House come back.
Salary cap etc info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_Salary_Cap
RE: TheShowPowe…
true, but the Telfair trade included trading LaFrenz and acquiring Theo Ratliff. Ratliff’s contract expired a year earlier than LaFrenz’s which enabled Danny to trade for KG. Looking at it from this angle makes the Telfair trade well worth it.
by lumpymoo on Jun 20, 2008 7:00 PM EDT reply actions
What’s done is done. DA does a solid job, regardless . ’Nuff said. =)
And, he’s a gazillion times better than Chris Wallace, right?
Chris Wallace’s draft:
Let’s see, Kedrick Brown, trading Joe Johnson, with the 10th and 11th picks, oh yeah in 2001 select Jerome Moiso (I was there to actually witness that), and the list goes on. Josip Sesar with the 46th pick attained in the trade with Seattle, etc. Oh yeah, don’t forget Joe Forte, the guy who kept getting arrested, or DUI w/e.
I remember, when Forte was selected, the guy on TV said “he had a good coach who trained him well at NC” or something along those lines…
You can’t say there was “NO CHANCE.” For example, i’m pretty sure Minny would have taken an AJ, Roy, Raef package (and we’d get to keep our two extra picks). Or a predraft trade of Wally, the #5 pick and Al. Ratliff helped, but to say there was “NO CHANCE” is incorrect.
I hear you, but in the first case you’d be losing Roy, just like if you didn’t draft him. The final outcome is the same: we get KG, we lose Roy; in the second trade we get KG and keep Roy, but don’t get Ray Allen. So, and that is my point, you guys cannot count the Telfair trade as an error. To get KG Danny had to pay a high price. He just decided to do it taking a shot at Telfair. Can you imagine what would have happened if Bassy would have ended being a starting-caliber point guard? He saw an opportunity and tried to get the most out of it. It was a win-win situation. It just didn’t work.
by V_for_verde on Jun 20, 2008 8:04 PM EDT reply actions
Ainge has always had a terrific eye out for value with low, seemingly valueless picks. With the 30th pick I would entertain a trade, but I trust Ainge’s expertise to draft a BALLER.
by TradeProposalDude on Jun 20, 2008 9:37 PM EDT reply actions
There will be a good player at #30 – The question is whether danny stays there or moves it for a high second round draft and a future first.
Richie Hendrix, George Hill, Ryan Anderson, Hickson, Hardin, Spreights, Ibaka, Lee, Wheeler, etc. Best player available even though I’d really like them to go for a young big with some height. With Perk out, we really needed someone that could match up with the 6-10- 7’2 guys out there. I think we never did find that big SF that Ainge/Rivers wanted but we’re definately going to have to aquire someone to replace Pollard and perhaps PJ Brown and have very little money to do it with. McDyess may sign with us since he picked Detroit over Boston a few years back only because he though Detroit was closer to a title than Boston but he has a lot of respect for Danny. Here’s where Scal’s contract really hurts us for what we need in the height department. Team has to make up their mind on Posey and Tony Allen since resigning Posey to the mid level hurts us trying to sign our second round picks to multi-yr deals which allowed us to keep guys like Powe and big Baby. We can find a backup veteran point in free agency if Cassell doesn’t return and we should find it easier to “recruit” fringe veteran role players now that we won the title.
by desertgreen on Jun 20, 2008 9:44 PM EDT reply actions
We need more size and if not that, then a swingman/2 guard type that can score. Lee, Douglas-Roberts, etc. Someone who eventually will take over for Ray. As for a power 3, as anyone heard anything on the kid Dove from Oklahoma State? No idea what is draft status is but he looked like a 6’9" athletic kid who was defensive wiz in college.
If I was Danny, I would make every effort to trade up far enough to draft Hibbert. If it took our first , plus either Powe or BBaby, I would do it. Perk is a bit small for a NBA center and is also injury prone. Hibbert is a legitimate 7’2" center, can block shots and rebound a bit. He is not a great athlete, but neither is Perk. Hibbert has had the good Georgetown coaching and has no character issues. He will definitely be a better backup/occasional starter then Pollard. And while I admired what PJ Brown did for us, I dont think he ever got his feet off the ground. Hibbert can do that. As far as replacing Cassell, there are always journeymen point guards out there. House did a nice job as a replacement. AND, many of the Celts, including Danny, are very high on Pruitt as both the backup for RR and Ray Allen.
If the draft goes anything like the DraftExpress mock, I’d be thrilled with landing JJ Hickson. He’d be a lottery pick next season if he stayed another year in college. A beast of a player down low.
by djp200 on Jun 21, 2008 11:33 AM EDT reply actions






























