CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

Nobody Wants The 4th Year

Bob Finnan of News Herald (Cleveland Paper) reports:

Posey, 31, is expected to get the full mid-level exception - starting with $5.6 million in 2008-09 - for three years. Sources say the Cavs might have to extend it out four years in order to land Posey.  And, therein lies the problem. Most teams don't want to give him a four-year contract, including Boston. The Cavs lived to regret giving four-year deals to Donyell Marshall and Damon Jones.  For one thing, Posey will be 35 by the end of the contract. Secondly, he's a bench player, a good piece for a team close to a championship, as the Celtics found out this past season. Also, that's a lot of money to pay a player who probably won't be a starter. His best position is small forward. The Cavs have some other guy (LeBron James) who plays more than 40 minutes a game at the "3" spot.  Some think Posey could start at shooting guard with the Cavs, but that's not his best position.

It looks like the Celtics and Posey's agent are in a good ol' fashioned game of stare down.  Bartelstein is hoping the threat of other teams making offers will force the Celtics to blink first.  The Celtics don't want to bid against themselves and are content to gamble that nobody else will give a 4th year.  They figure that with equal deals on the table Posey will take the deal to come back to Boston.

It stands to reason that most teams don't want to go to a 4th year.  Like the Cavs, many teams have been burned by long term deals in the past.  Considering that amazing free agent class of 2010 (James, Wade, Bosh, to name a few), nobody is going to tie up long term money.  In fact, if anyone was, it would be Cleveland in an effort to keep good players around James.

The bottom line is that James Posey is a very good player, deserving of the full mid level for 3 years (in this market).  Nobody wants to give him that 4th year.  Of course it only takes one team to push all in and give him what he wants, but I tend to think that if that was going to happen, it would have happened by now.  If you are another team and you have Posey targeted as the top guy left on the market, now would be the time to move.  All you have to do is offer that 4th year and he's yours.  But that hasn't happened yet.

In fact, on the other side of the fence there's a little bit of pressure on Bartelstein to get a deal done sooner rather than later.  Boston has to be Posey's top choice (all offers being equal) and Boston has a line of free agents wanting to come here stretching around the block.  If the Celtics decide that the opportunity to move on some of those guys is more important than waiting around for Posey, they could decide to move on at any time.

I think in the end Bartelstein will blink first and accept the Celtics offer of 3 years at the full MLE.  Then we can get on with the rest of the offseason.

0 recs  |  Comment 54 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

3 at the full MLE.

What does that do to the team’s ability to sign a few other players (let’s say House and Andersen)?

by SShoreFan 2.0 on Jul 11, 2008 7:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

they can sign as many players for the vet min. as they want and I think they can use the LLE

[url=http://www.celticsblog.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3578&Itemid=189]see Roy’s FAQ’s here[/url]

by Jeff Clark on Jul 11, 2008 7:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

SShoreFan 2.0 said:
  3 at the full MLE.

What does that do to the team’s ability to sign a few other players (let’s say House and Andersen)?

I don’t think it matters. Posey is the key guy here. There are other players to fill in the other slots, which probably won’t be filled with the greatest players. Posey is unique in his abilities and there is no one player that can replace him.

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 7:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ainge should tell Posey to sign before the end of the day today. If Posey does not, Ainge is going to present an offer sheet to Josh Childress or Nenad Krstic, and Posey can wait 8 days before knowing whether there is a place for him on the Celtics.

by Brickowski on Jul 11, 2008 7:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Boston has a line of free agents wanting to come here stretching around the block.

Who are these free agents that are supposedly lining up to joint the Celtics? Peitris, Maggette, Barry? Most of the good ones weren’t waiting to joint the Celtics, just mostly scrubs left (with the exception of Posey and possibly Childress, who we probably have no chance at getting).

There isn’t one free agent waiting to sign with the Celtics that can fill Posey’s shoes, which Posey’s agent knows.

by Bankshot on Jul 11, 2008 7:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This doesn’t surprise me. As I said in a post a couple days ago, a team has Cleveland has more to lose by signing Posey to a long term deal than Boston does. Unless Danny pulls a couple more miracles or the Big Three are super human, this team isn’t going to be contending in 4 years. Thus, having Posey for an extra year isn’t going to kill us. The Cavs, on the other hand, should be competitive as long as they have LeBron. Posey could actually hurt their chances of winning a title in a couple years.

by Jon on Jul 11, 2008 7:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bartelsteins latest comments wreak of desperation.

Posey will be here for 3 years.

Then next year we will trade for DWade.

by rickyfan3.0... on Jul 11, 2008 7:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it’s poker stare-down time. good luck danny. a question—what happens to the luxury salary cap money that goes to the nba? what do they do with it?

by nazzbo on Jul 11, 2008 8:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think I could get by on $16,800,000 over the next 3 freakin’ years.

Clearly Posey doesn’t think he can.

Man, these people are crazy greedy.

Forget it…Posey is gonzo…good riddance

by mcpu40 on Jul 11, 2008 8:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

nazzbo said:
  … a question—what happens to the luxury salary cap money that goes to the nba? what do they do with it?

I think it’s split, by formula, to teams not into the tax. That’s how former owner Ron Gaston made his money and why we should appreciate our present owners.

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 8:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Really, when will he sign the contract?

by Jimi Hendrix on Jul 11, 2008 8:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

what happens to the luxury salary cap money that goes to the nba? what do they do with it?

As TrueGreen said, it’s split. How that works is that all the luxury tax money goes into a pool. Each team that didn’t go over the tax gets 1/30 of that pool. This season, 8 teams went over the tax, and 22 did not. Thus, 22/30 of the money is paid to the owners who did not go over the tax, in equal shares. This amounted to just over $3 million per non-tax-paying team this season.

The remaining money (in the case, 8/30ths of the tax amount, or roughly $24 million) can be used by the league for “league purposes” and/or can be distributed to the teams (all 30 of them) in equal shares.

by Roy_Hobbs on Jul 11, 2008 8:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why not just give Posey the 4th year and then trade him after the 3rd year in which he will be an expiring contract?

by Bankshot on Jul 11, 2008 8:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

To continue my post:

…. so that we can move on and sign other players before the good ones are all gone.

by Bankshot on Jul 11, 2008 8:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Roy Hobbs, thanks for your more complete explanation of the luxury tax. According to your description, does this mean the C’s may be able to get back some of the money they paid into the luxury tax pool?. If so, the luxury tax may not be as much of an issue as it’s made out to be. It makes me think more is going on with the Posey contract than the mle and number of years. It could be they are working on something in addition to this. In my dream world James has already decided to come back, but the stall is because something else is going on. Please say you agree with me (or dream with me). I really think he’s that important to this team.

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 9:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bankshot said:
  To continue my post:

…. so that we can move on and sign other players before the good ones are all gone.

I’m not sure this is a problem. All the players that have signed would either not be available to us because of cost, fit or value. Anyone else out there seems to fall into these same categories. ESPN lists, besides Posey as “The Best of Rest”
Josh Smith, Iguodala and Okafur. I don’t see Smith or Iguodala as good fits here. Okafur might be a possiblility as a Perk backup or even a starter (not really sure). Okafur is restricted, and I would have expected that he would be set already. Biedrins from Golden St is also restricted and still available. Both would probably be in the 7-10 mill range. Not sure how good Biedrins is. I just wonder if Danny is working on a sign and trade for a big.

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 9:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Roy Hobbs, thanks for your more complete explanation of the luxury tax. According to your description, does this mean the C’s may be able to get back some of the money they paid into the luxury tax pool?. If so, the luxury tax may not be as much of an issue as it’s made out to be.

Thanks, TrueGreen. They could get back some of it, but not much. There should be about $24 million left over. Even assuming the league keeps none of that amount for itself (which seems unlikely), that would mean that each of the teams would receive $800,000 in equal shares from the unallocated amount.

Right now, the Celts paid $8 million in tax last year, plus missed out on the $3 million refund. Even if they got the $800k credit, they’d still be $10m in the hole.

by Roy_Hobbs on Jul 11, 2008 9:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

At what point does Danny say to Posey’s agent “In 24 hours, we are going to move on to plan B”?

by Truth Hurts on Jul 11, 2008 9:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brickowski’s right, Ainge needs to set a deadline. Posey’s agent is just dragging this out, hoping Ainge will blink. Meanwhile, the Celtics could get hurt if they don’t move soon enough on other free agents.

Set a time to put up, or shut up. As a courtesy, first inform Posey and agent of it, and then make it public.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 9:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Truth Hurts said:
  At what point does Danny say to Posey’s agent “In 24 hours, we are going to move on to plan B”?

I don’t think this is a good way for Danny to deal with a respected player. Danny’s worked hard to bring back decency to this organization. I can see where Danny needs to protect the Celtic’s needs in a business transaction, but it needs to be done in a respectful and fair manner. Other present players and free agents are looking at how this Posey matter is handled by the organization. Now, many players want to come here because it is a respected organization that handles these things correctly. We don’t want to ruin this. I agree that at some time we need to move on, but I think this will be settled soon. And, as I said before, I don’t see the immediate rush to turn away from a player who can really help us and who fits in here.

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 9:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t like the idea of setting a deadline. It’s very aggressive and full of ill-will. Sends an awful message.

This is a guy we want to keep. A guy who played an important role on our championship winning side.

Let’s not go out of our way to treat him badly

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 9:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It kind of boggles my mind that teams like Cleveland and Houston continue to be listed as destinations for Posey. (I have to believe that Ainge knows everything below):

The question not addresses by sportswriters — or that i haven’t seen — is what is the effect of signing Posey on the teams supposedly interested in Posey. Here’s my calculations (based on posted salary data):

A. Boston — Signing posey to an MLE deal (along with resigning HOuse and some vet. min additions) puts us about $7.5M over the luxury tax level — a $1M less than last year. We start next summer about $1M under the lux tax limit.

B. Cleveland - this never gets written about - signing Posey to an MLE deal puts them $17-20M over the luxury tax limit …. is there really any reason to think (a) they’d go that far over the lux tax limit (that’s more than New York paid last year) and (b) they’d sign Posey for 4 years?

C. LA Fakers — Signing Posey would mean paying $11M in luxury tax this year and assuming they sign Bynum for $9M (a bargain?) and Vujacic for $3M it puts them over for next summer already.

D. Houston — Signing Big Games James takes them from being under the Lux Tax to over… a big jump for a team that has Shane Battier doing much of what Posey does.

E. Detroit - I didn’t calculate for them since (a) they have the room but (b) they’re looking to reshape their roster in trades (McGrady?) so it’s hard to imagine they’d sign Posey before doing that.

F. New Orleans - IMO the only legitimate offer can come from N.O. Because Chris Paul’s extension doesn’t kick in till next year signing Posey leaves them well under the Lux Tax limit. However…. I think they’d be more reluctant than us to give a 4th year as it would cut into the pretty sizeable cap room they have when both Peja and Tyson Chandler come off the books in 2011.

by Gainesville Celtic on Jul 11, 2008 9:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t see setting a deadline as being particulary aggressive, disrespectful or indecent. It’s business-like. You’ve made it clear you want Posey. If he chooses to decline your offer, you’re sorry, but there’s no hard feelings. Time to move on. There’s no need to treat Posey like an infant.

Make it clear to players and agents that you intend to run your business as a business. It will keep you out of trouble.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 10:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, nokidding.

I strongly disagree that setting a deadline is disrespecting Posey or anything like that. The reality is: the longer this goes on, the tougher it is for the Celts to recover if he goes elsewhere. There are deals going down every day. It’s not fair to Danny to drag this out, when whatever player/players are part of Plan B could go elsewhere. Posey’s agent is in effect holding the Celts hostage at this point. Obviously, every interested party has their offer on the table. If anyone was going to budge, it would have happened by now. Danny needs to resolve this before he can do anything else. Posey is not helping the Celts right now, dragging this out. It is even threatening to screw them out of signing other players that don’t even play Posey’s position, because Danny does not know how much he can spend until this is resolved.

Posey is well within his rights to drag this out, if that is what is best for him. And Danny is well within his rights to set a deadline, if that is what is best for the Celts. If Posey really intends to re-sign, and Danny sets a deadline. Posey’s agent can tell other interested teams to give him their final offers so Posey can make a decision.

$hit or get off the pot, BGJ.

by Truth Hurts on Jul 11, 2008 10:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If you have any experience negotiating, you set a deadline.

I guess Batelstein figures that if he was able to hose Ainge on Mark Blount’s contract, he can do it again.

by Brickowski on Jul 11, 2008 10:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It’s been what 2-3 days since Free Agency opened for official signings. It’s way too early in the process to go around setting deadlines and giving ultimatums. It needs more time to play out before that becomes the best course of action.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 11:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No, you need toset the deadline now. The good free agents will go first, and if Posey drags things out, the Celtics may lose out on other valuable players.

We are just starting to see the most valuable restricted free agents get offer sheets. That process will accelerate. The best unrestricted free agents are already gone.

by Brickowski on Jul 11, 2008 11:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who are you worried about missing out on?

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 11:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who, I tip my hat to your extensive knowledge of NBA players. And if you argue that the Celtic’s choices among backup centers and point guards are limited, and that there isn’t much difference between them, then I’m willing to say you might be right.

But regardless: I want Ainge to be able to get the best of what’s out there. The difference in playoff games can come down to very small things. So I don’t want to miss out on anyone and settle for second best, just because Posey’s agent is trying to play me along.

Let Posey look to his interests, and Ainge to his.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 11:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No deadline needed. Look what happened to Posey last year, he waited and waited and had to accept a low offer from the C’s. He doesn’t want this to happen again this year. He’ll decide soon.

by libermaniac on Jul 11, 2008 12:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well Who, I mentioned two of them earlier: Josh Childress and Nenad Krstic.

IMHO Childress was a pretty good 6th man for the Hawks last year and he’s also 6-8. The Hawks may have to match a huge offer sheet for Josh Smith and may not have the financial flexibility to match a fair market offer for Childress.

As for Krstic, he’s a 7 footer and was a very good offensive player before his injury.

Arroyo, Najera, Nachbar and Hermann are four other guys who interest me. None of them will lilely cost the full MLE, but they won’t be available with the LLE either.

Lastly there are Eddie House and Tony Allen.

by Brickowski on Jul 11, 2008 12:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Libermaniac, your logic escapes me.

You say Posey didn’t like it that he waited around last year, only to accept the Celtics low ball offer. So therefore he won’t wait this year, and will soon take this year’s low ball offer from the Celtics? And he’s more likely to this, because there’s no deadline?

I’m waiting for someone to explain why a deadline imposed by Ainge isn’t in the interests of the Celtics. And please don’t bother with any emotional appeals about the respect, dignity, feelings, and pride of players and agents. Business is business.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 12:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bartlestein is also J.R. Giddens’ agent right? So why withhold from rookie/FA camp? How does this figure into the Posey contract negotiation?

by BleedinGreen417 on Jul 11, 2008 12:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Only Bartlestein could know that for sure.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 12:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Brick, missed your earlier post when you mentioned those guys.

I don’t like Childress. He’s a poor defender and he’s a poor jump shooter. Those are the two things I want most from by backup on the wing. The third skill that could change my mind is the ability to create your own shot which again Childress can’t do. I don’t like him for this team (nor for most teams), he’s a grossly overrated player. There’s some good things in his game but they’re not what I’m looking for on this Celtics team. I’d rather pass on him and sign someone else, any of about half a dozen other swingmen in free agency that likely will all be in the 1-3mil range on short term contracts.

Krstic is a risky signing. Could be great if he gets back to full health and effectiveness. Extra scoring option with some post skills and a very nice face up J with good range. Be nice to have another big man alongside KG who can score as KG gets older. Risky though. Very risky for a defending champion. Too risky for my taste.

Both will likely require 5 year full MLE offers just to test their teams. It’s possible they could be had though.

I’m not worried about losing either of those guys. I’d rather wait on Posey.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 1:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think what libermaniac is getting at is the longer Posey waits the more his market place shrinks. Quite a few of his potential bidders are already off the table limiting his options and bargaining position.

Posey’s position looks weaker now than it did when free agency opened. Where will it be in four more days? How about a week? How about if he waits as long as last summer and gets bit in his rear end again?

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 1:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So what? If Posey’s value on the market is dropping, shouldn’t Ainge lower his offer in the days ahead? There’s always a time dependent element to any offer, even if one pretends there isn’t.

In effect, Posey wants Ainge’s offer to sit there indefinitely while he looks to find something more, also, he hopes Ainge will increase it (because Ainge’s alternative market possibilities are also shrinking). Now I fully appreciate why Posey and his agent want to do this. I would too, as would any sensible person. But it’s not in the interests of the Celtics. A deadline is.

Again, explain to me why it isn’t?

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 1:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why should Ainge drop his offer? That’ll just insult him and send him towards the arms of whatever teams are still left in the bidding. That just hurts Danny’s chances of getting him here.

There is a time dependency in this situation but the time hasn’t run out yet and it’s not close to running out. It’s too early. It’s only been 2-3 days of official signings. Give it more time.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 1:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So we’re still with the insult thing?

Yes, in the silly world of professional sports, it’d certainly be a great and terrible insult for Ainge to lower his offer to Posey as Posey’s value dropped. But of course, it’s not an insult to the Celtics that Posey is out shopping around with Ainge’s offer in his back pocket, and while Ainge’s alternatives are disappearing.

That’s why it’s in the Celtic’s interest to set a deadline. In that way, you don’t have to worry about insulting anyone’s feelings.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 2:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sorry Brick, looks like Najera just signed with the Brooklyn LeBrons

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-najeranets071108&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

by Jeff Clark on Jul 11, 2008 2:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brick is right on many levels here, including advocating Childress.

by mcpu40 on Jul 11, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t say his value dropped. I said his position was weaker because there were less bidders on the market. That doesn’t mean there isn’t one team there willing to pay the same price, just that Posey’s options were decreasing. Difference in suitors not necessarily value. Thus Ainge shouldn’t drop his price.

Now if Posey moseys on down for three weeks and finds himself in a situation where he clearly cannot get an MLE or close to it offer then Ainge could with all fairness lower his offer.

Posey isn’t asking for unfair starting money. The MLE is a fair price for a 6th man, especially one as proven as him. Length wise is a question mark. I wouldn’t pay him 5 years. I’d walk away from that and I wouldn’t spend my full MLE on anyone else because there’s nobody else good enough available. Four years he’s well worth that. Brent Barry got that in San Antonio at a similar age. Four years at the MLE is very fair.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 2:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

But of course, it’s not an insult to the Celtics that Posey is out shopping around with Ainge’s offer in his back pocket, and while Ainge’s alternatives are disappearing.

Ainge is a big boy. He can go out and sign someone else at any moment in time. Danny went after Maggette and that’s fair enough. Posey isn’t stopping him.

Posey situation was clear from the word go, before he ever put on a Celtics jersey. He was signing short term so that he could try and gain one last long term contract. This is exactly what is always was going to be.

But giving the man a ultimatum which a deadline is this early in the day …. That’s not nice and it’s going to do Danny any favours in getting Posey to sign at the dotted line. Players don’t like that, just look at Elton Brand. Riley gave Posey a take it or leave it offer last summer which Posey didn’t like and said so – although in fairness it was far lower financially which was uncompetitive as well as offensive.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 2:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Okay. So even as we speak, Najera drops from the ranks of available players, shrinking Ainge’s alternatives. Meanwhile, Cleveland likely eliminates itself from the list of suitors for Posey, lessening his market position.

You know, if we did a poll on this blogsite, I’m sure you would’ve found a whole lot more people who would’ve advoceatd a four or five year offer to Posey three days ago, than you would three days from now. Yet it’s being argued that Ainge shouldn’t set any deadlines, and hold out his offer to Posey indefinitely. That’s bad business.

By the way, I’m a free market kind of guy, in case you couldn’t tell. I don’t get into issues of what’s fair. By my way of thinking, Posey should seek as much money as possible, and the Celtics should strive to have him playing for them for as little as possible.

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 2:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

By the way, isn’t Posey also a big boy? And what particular value did Posey actually have to last year’s Miami team?

As for Elton Brand, do you figure the other players will kick him out of the union?

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 2:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Posey is a big boy too. I don’t care about his feelings because he’s a person. I’m not nice enough for that. I care about whether he signs or not. I don’t want Danny to start doing things that will turn him away from the club and the contract offer, especially unnecessary things like a deadline this early in free agency. Treat him well and make him feel wanted.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 2:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I love the Elton Brand story. What is it with Duke guys? First Boozer double crosses Clevland and now this. I guys those guys learn well from the master in college how to be snievling lying weisels.

I hate to see other good players sign waiting around for Possey. I know he did a good job last year, but it is not like the guy is an all-star. I agree with Brick. Give him 24 hours to sign or go pound sand.

by JohnK70 on Jul 11, 2008 2:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Najera has nothing to offer the Celtics. No loss. He was poor in Denver.

Dumb move by New Jersey. How many big men do they have on their roster now? It must be 8 right?

Heck at least Vince will have another leader in the locker room. You don’t want Vince’s lazy ways leaking into all the youngsters they’ve got there now. At least there’s some bright side to that move.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 2:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Keeping the Duke connection alive …. Don’t forget how Danny Ferry treated the Clippers.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 2:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Who, I’m ducking out of this debate. Too much work to be done. Besides, I respect your opinion and don’t wish to irritate you further.

I’ll check back later to see if anyone ever takes up the challenge of explaining why it’s not in the Celtics’ interest to set a deadline for Posey (without resorting to emotional appeals).

by no kidding on Jul 11, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Gosh, we signed Patrick O Bryant on a two year deal according to Marc Spears a post in the forum just said. Horrible news.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 3:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

no kidding,

Looks like more folks agree with yourself and Brick anyway.

by Who on Jul 11, 2008 3:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is an incredible thread regardless of opinions. Last year we were talking about KG, a probable Hall of Famer and now so much is being discussed about a bench player who plays about 30 minutes a game with miniscule stats. This James Posey guy must be something special to generate all this interest. Dickerson on Mohegan Sun Sports made an interesting comment about James. He said Posey doesn’t like the spotlight and he loved playing here because of the people he was surrounded by. If he goes to another team alot will be expected of him, unrealistic expectations. I like to think Celtic fans are pretty knowledgeable and have realistic expectations of what Posey does. I need to go back and look at Roy Hobb’s explanation of salary cap/luxury cap stuff. I want to know if the MLE counts toward these. I’m not sure why we keep talking about using the MLE to pay Posey. Why can’t he just be paid with non MLE money. Somehow I think there’s other stuff going on so that the C’s could give Pose the dollars in some other way and use the MLE elsewhere. I think other teams have given it their best shot and that Pose is set to sign here with the wait being due to other stuff happening.

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 8:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

From Roy Hobbs’ exlplanation of salary cap: The MLE: The MLE can be used to sign players to contracts for a maximum of five years, with annual raises equivalent to 8% of the contracts first year value each year. This exception is available to teams above the salary cap, and can be used annually. For the 2008-09 season, the MLE can be used to give free agents contracts starting at $5.585 million. The MLE can be used in its entirety on one player, or can be split amongst several players.

My question is does this money count toward the luxury tax?

by TrueGreen on Jul 11, 2008 8:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Stoudemire/Richardson for Ray/Baby, expirings...
Small
Another Philly Trade Idea
Small
GREAT TRADE IDEAA
It_s_rajon__small
Oh Sheed...how we forget that...
190518335osmpfk_ph_1__small
Ray Allen for Jason Richardson?
Garnett300x300_080221_small
Are you guys serious about Kevin Martin? (FG%:0.384!!!)
Pats_locker_room_small
Tanguay Admits To Goof!
Small
Time to move Sheed
Rondooo_small
Rondoooo
Davis_davisb_spts_small
If Not now, WHEN?!?!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Authors

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne

Small Fafnir