Excited To Have Walker Aboard Right Away

A Daily Babble Production
As Jeff noted on Sunday, indications from the Celtics brass are that Bill Walker will not be going overseas as planned but is instead expected to stay with the Celtics. File me under 'fairly excited' by this development.
Admittedly, I haven't been overly enamored with the Celtics' off-season thus far. Well, that's at least as far as preparation for 2008-09 is concerned as the whole "being champions" deal has worked out quite well. Since the preference here is not to get too wrapped up in really breaking down those moves until we at least get within a month of the season (and actually seeing this team play once said season starts will provide considerably more understanding for all of us), we'll table the overall off-season commentary with the relatively objective assessment that there are a lot of question marks on the Celtics' bench moving forward.
While those question marks aren't necessarily wholly settling for the fan base of a team looking to defend a championship, one of the upsides is that joy of exploring the unknown, seeing who can truly hang in this league and who has the potential to explode over the seasons to come. Again, that upshot is definitively not preferable for a team in win-now mode (as the Celtics should be) to feeling much more secure about the team's depth, but that curiosity has become one of the more fun parts of this off-season. To that end, Walker intrigues me as much as any of the uncertainties on this team.
Read More..All of Steve's daily posts can be found in the CelticsBlog: NBA blog. Check him out!
In his draft profile of Walker, ESPN's Chad Ford writes, "Walker's second ACL injury ended all the talk about him being a top-5 pick." There are two major points to take out of that phrasing. The first is that, yes, as has been discussed ad nauseam, Walker has a problematic injury history, and there are certainly concerns about his legs. The other point is that there was talk of this guy being one of the top five picks in the NBA draft. He has the capability to be good. Really, really good.
Between his ongoing recovery from injury and the entrance of the nation's most impressive individual player to his school's program, Walker spent a good part of last season toiling in the shadow of Michael Beasley. That's fair enough as Beasley was a fantastic college player who is likely to make it big for himself in the NBA as well. But Walker had a very nice season in his own right. In 27.3 minutes per game last season, he averaged 16.1 points and 6.3 boards and shot 46.5 percent from the field, a major improvement from the 40 percent he shot his freshman year.
At 6-foot-6 and 220 pounds, Walker possesses solid size and excellent bulk for a small forward. He attacks the rim hard and had incredible leaping ability prior to the ACL injury in the midst of his freshman year. Though he's still recovering from that injury and has undoubtedly had that athleticism affected by his surgeries, Walker still has plenty of explosiveness left. Having the opportunity to see him play in person during his sophomore season left it apparent that Walker can still get up. He has packed a ton of strength into his frame and has the ability to overpower his man both in the post and as a slasher. He has reportedly been working hard on his outside shot, which needs some work, but he has the capability to become a highly explosive scorer. The quickness, the length, the strength and the jumping are there, and the range is coming.
Walker could also just as well be a bust. He needs to improve his ball-handling and become a better decision-maker. Walker's shot selection could improve, and he needs to be more careful with the ball. There was significant concern among scouts about his turnover-prone nature. These are things he needs to commit to fixing if he is going to make it at the pro level.
As I read through my own words, it sounds like I could just as easily be describing Tony Allen, another Celtics draft pick with immense physical talents but injuries and head issues that have hampered him from reaching his full potential thus far. Bill Walker is significantly bigger than Tony Allen. He arrives in Boston as a player who was far more highly touted during his healthy college days and a player who has already been humbled by a set of significant injuries. Walker has the wingspan and quickness to become a capable defender and all the tools to become a prolific scorer one day in this league if he stays focused. From everything written about him in the Globe article linked above, it sounds like Walker is off to a good start so far as staying determined to improve is concerned.
This isn't to say that Bill Walker will be a star in this league or that he will even be any sort of significant contributor this season. He likely won't be consistent, and he'll probably meet his share of ups and downs. But as much as anybody else, he has the capability to provide a spark off the bench for this team from time to time. In an off-season of moves shrouded in uncertainty, Walker provides a captivating set of questions moving forward.
Because if Bill Walker can answer those questions anywhere near successfully, the Celtics are going to have a heckuva prospect on their hands.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He fell that far in the draft for a reason….he is a gamble. Danny took a gamble on Giddens too. He, too, earned his low draft status but underneath lies a lot of talent. I doubt everybody else was wrong on these two guys but it is great draft strategy…finding one player out of two gambles is better than the formula “best player on the board” draft strategy. Way to go Danny
O’Bryant,Powe,Baby,Giddens,Walker….all guys with lottery hopes and talent at one time….some top lottery stuff so they say..these are no lose type picks and if just one hits it big????it could help carry KG&PP for a few extra years…these aren’t even gambles,you gamble when you pick in the lottery,these are no-brainers for a title team
The column talks a lot about unworldly athleticism, but not much abojut actual basketball talent. In this respect, I do think the Tony Allen comparison makes sense. I am curious to see the guy actually play before I get excited.
That said, Walker is not going to get much playing time, especially in the beginning. This will make it difficult for him to adjust to the NBA and, unless he absolutely blows everyone away in short minutes, it wil probably be a year before we know who he is. Patience will be key, folks.
I think if anybody outside of Lebron James had double knee surgery they would have dropped out of the first round. I have followed Bill Walker for a long time in fact. Admittedly it was because of his shear athleticism in the beginning. However, his size is there. Paul Pierce didn’t fall out of the top ten but one mention of lack of athleticism and selfish play dropped him from top 3 to 10. Gilbert Arenas also was a second round pick because of various issues. You wouldn’t not call him a star would you? He just inked a brand new contract worth a hefty sum. If Walker puts in his due diligence I see him taking over Ray’s spot in the foreseeable future. 2 years time. It also won’t hurt him that Ray expires after the next season. I do think he can be a star!
Re Surferdad….points well taken but perhaps one glaring omission was BBIQ. While Big Baby had athleticism and talent it was his BBIQ as much as the other attributes that got him PT. As Steve Weinman points out Walker has had problems with TO’s as well as decision-making which could be related in a meaningful way. TO’s can also be caused by poor handles and carelessness protecting the ball (also mentioned as Walker shortcomings). Gabe Pruitt is an example of someone needing to protect the ball better without turning his back on the field of play.
In the last analysis, Walker’s PT could well depend upon how he responds to these deficiencies. BBIQ takes time to acquire and “gifted” athletes are sometimes tempted to rely too heavily on their strength and athleticism….which at the pro level can be a formula for disappointment.
Since good coaching can go a long way to correcting some of these problems ( along with a well motivated player) the continued development of our youth will certainly be a true test of our calibre of coaching expertise!
by moskqq on Sep 10, 2008 9:13 AM EDT reply actions
Hey moskqq, I think we are agreeing here. I consider BBIQ as part of basketball talent. Does Walker have it? I can’t say. Steve invokes the names of Tony Allen and Kedrick Brown — that makes me concerned. A lot of guys can shine in college (and high school) based almost solely on athleticism. I’m not saying Walker is one of those guys, I just don’t know since I haven’t seen him play.
Steve, as I got to the end of your fourth-to-last paragraph, I was thinking “Sounds like a bigger Tony Allen.” Then I read on. LOL. Nice read, as always.
I can’t wait for the preseason to begin so I can see these new guys play! I think there’s a decent chance we’ll see medical Bill get some burn. Someone has got to play back-up SF.
It’s overly simplistic to believe that one can “shine” in the NBA based on athleticism alone. Perhaps when it comes to the Slam Dunk contest but as Gerald Green aptly demonstrates it isn’t enough.
Those shinning stars in the NBA who are also athletically gifted generally have BBIQ and loads of basketball talent to complement their God-given athleticism!
by moskqq on Sep 10, 2008 11:43 AM EDT reply actions
It’s a long time ago but in recollecting the reason Paul Pierce fell in the draft from #3-10 was the concern that he was too small to play PF and not agile enough to play SF. He was, in effect, thought to be a player without a true NBA position. Which further illustrates that the draft is as much a science as it is an art.
by moskqq on Sep 10, 2008 12:10 PM EDT reply actions
My father is from Manhattan, KS where K-State is located. With this connection I grew up rooting for the Wildcats. I would like to point out that before Michael Beasley, Bill Walker was the biggest recruit to dawn the power purple. When he was a true freshman he was outrageously talented. Then last season, I felt at times he was a better player than Beasley.
I am very excited for Bill Walker in Celtics green. I actually yelled when they did not take him with the last pick in the first. I then did a happy dance when they got him in round 2.
Same drivel attacking Tony, different day/like a freaking broken record.
If you hadn’t heard of Tony in college or coming out of college – then
a. you didn’t watch the Final Four and
b. you never read anything at all about the Big 12 – since he was Big 12 Player of the Year.
by Nanc on Sep 10, 2008 2:33 PM EDT reply actions
Same drivel attacking Steve Weinman, different day/like a freaking broken record.
If you can’t respect Steve’s opinion or doubt his basketball knowledge – then
a. you don’t follow his writing closely, and therefore miss out on just how much basketball he’s watched and how much research goes into each of his columns; or
b. you have a personal axe to grind.
You scared me with the headline. My first thought was of another Walker coming here.
Walker and Giddens are similar in that they both have immense talent. The question that will be answered over the next couple years is, do they they have the drive to get better. It could be they both make it, but lets not expect much from Walker this year. He’s too young, and, like TAllen, needs some distance from his injuries. And to see how the great pros play.

by 




























