Memphis signs Darius Miles
Hey guys, to give some relief for the C's losing streak, read this:
Grizzlies signed Miles to a 10-day contract. How this affect the Celtics? It doesn't, but this was pretty good for the NBA. Portland can't pull the crap they pulled and get away with it. That e-mail they sent threading the NBA team was borderline criminal. Miles is not a very good basketball player, but that doesn't mean he can't play basketball because of some fucking morons who gave him a huge contract. It backfired mightly, and I think we won't be seeing any of this crap in the future. Hopefully.
Thoughts?
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
I think that this will be
the start of some time in court (unless they do indeed intend to play him). Not saying it’s right. Just saying that’s probably what’s going to happen. The Blazers sent the letter to warn teams to not just sign him to mess up our cap space. If they sign him to indeed play and help their club, then so be it. I wish Darius good luck, and hope he is making the right descision. Hope he doesn’t screw up his knees even more.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Jan 10, 2009 2:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That letter was irresponsible
It jeopardized the future of Darius Miles. Plus, who the fuck are the Blazers to warn anybody? That was the part that truly pissed me off about the letter. What would Kevin Pritchard do? Kill someone? Call bad names? They can’t prove it was malicious by any team, Miles is a player like any other. I’m glad someone stood up for this crap. I ain’t got nothing against the Blazers or something like that, I’d be pissed even if it was the C’s warning every team in the NBA to not sign Scal or something.
Mother---- him and John Wayne!
by MerryGoByeBye on Jan 10, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't sure what to think when I first heard.
There is nothing we, as (Blazer) fans, can do about it. You do make a good point. I think we were worried about paying Miles’ salary plus writing a 15+ million dollar check for Miles to play a few minutes in garbage time. But like I said, I have no ill will against Darius. We would just like the cap space. We want to be like you guys some day. World champs!
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Jan 10, 2009 4:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah...
I can only imagine. I’m jealous.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Jan 10, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It isn't Darius or Memphis fault really
Darius had a bad contract, period. Like many other NBA players have. That doesn’t mean he has to retire because of that. I even think this might somehow help the Blazers, it keeps them from any dumb FA signing (see Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Clippers and, Jesus, New York Knicks).
Mother---- him and John Wayne!
by MerryGoByeBye on Jan 10, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They can try
But the Blazers don’t have a chance of winning on this one.
Even if Memphis signed him just to mess up Portlands salary cap, that would have to be proven and there is no way to prove it unless Memphis is dumb enough to pull a McHale and put that in writing.
Plus the players association would be all over Pritchard and co.
by Jaycelt on Jan 10, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Portland was trying to bully the other NBA franchises into not signing Miles
Because they knew they wouldn’t be able to do anything if anyone signed him.
Mother---- him and John Wayne!
by MerryGoByeBye on Jan 10, 2009 7:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Larry Miller and Paul Allen aren't stupid
and can hire smart lawyers, too.
I think you would be making a mistake to assume that there was not something that triggered that email. They didn’t send it when Boston signed Darius, and they didn’t send it when Memphis signed Darius.
So until you’ve assessed what triggered the email (if any of us know), I think you are probably not wise to assume that their motives were bullying. There is probably substantive proof that at least one team, and probably more, at least discussed taking this step for questionable motives.
There were certainly the statements reported on Yahoo. And those statements mean Portland has no legal case to answer. The day before the email was sent, it was reported that someone was going to screw Portland. The next day, they send an email saying if you sign him for the purpose of screwing us, we’ll sue. Obviously, they are responding to that media report, and perhaps to other things we don’t know about as well.
Pretty hard for the players association to make much out of that.
It will be very interesting to see what happens with Memphis. It would be cleanest if he gets a contract for the rest of the year. Then, it’s clear they wanted him. Two more games would be very messy.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 11, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, it wouldn't be that messy for Memphis
They could play Darius for just 2-3 games, and there is nothing the Blazers can do. I fail to see how a team with no playoff expectations for like the next 2 years could give a fuck about the Blazers cap situation. And that e-mail was an attempt to bully other team into not signing Miles, because that’s all they could do.
I’m afraid not even the world’s smartest lawyer could do much with it, Portland should just drop it before hurting the franchise image even more.
Mother---- him and John Wayne!
by MerryGoByeBye on Jan 11, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Miles is clearly not medically disabled (see footage of Celtics preseason games). There is no reason why his contract should not be on the books. Period.
If Portland wishes to waste time and money on legal fees, that’s really their own choice.
by kozlodoev on Jan 11, 2009 5:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The independent doctor said
there’s no cartilage left in the knee, it’s basically bone on bone, and that he can play but the risk of severe injury (knee replacement) is so high that he should never step on a court again.
If Portland had played him with that report (which was what their doctor also said), it would have left them with huge liabilities, as well as significant moral questions.
The terms on which he medically retired were not that he couldn’t play, but that the risk was too great. Footage of games does not prove anything about that.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 11, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
can anyone explain why the preseason games played count against his reinstatment. if they count then boston should have had miles wait out the drug suspension first before playing him.
by 2phattoplay on Jan 11, 2009 11:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
GREAT question!
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Jan 12, 2009 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I asked that question myself since the suspension was officially announced in September and the preseason games were in October. Here is the answer from Dave, our editor at Blazer's Edge
Basically because you don’t want people getting out of suspensions by serving them during games that don’t count. And they didn’t write in a special clause for this purpose. Perhaps they will when the next collective bargaining talks come around. I’m relatively sure they never considered the possible intersection of somebody coming back from medial retirement and somebody serving a suspension.
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 7:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























