Now Who's the "JailBlazer"?
Adrian Wojnarowski, over at Yahoo! Sports filed a story about Darius Miles this morning. Its a good read and it makes me look at Portland's management a little less glowingly
Before the Portland Trail Blazers resorted to a threatening email to frighten rival NBA teams from signing Darius Miles, team officials late last week made a brazen bid to claim the forward off waivers only to be stopped by the league, multiple front-office sources told Yahoo! Sports.
So determined to salvage the salary cap space that would come with the foiling of Miles’ comeback from a devastating knee injury, Portland president Larry Miller and general manager Kevin Pritchard apparently were willing to stash Miles on the sideline and keep him away from other NBA teams.
In denying the Blazers’ move to control Miles, NBA front-office sources say that league executives in New York denied the waiver claim because they believed the Blazers were merely trying to circumvent league salary cap rules.
Once the NBA rejected Portland’s waiver claim, Miller sent an unprecedented threat of legal action for any team that signed Miles as a free agent. Several league executives were aware of the bid on Miles and reacted angrily over what they considered hypocrisy.
........
Portland wanted to prevent Miles from playing an additional two games that would’ve nullified the benefit of salary cap relief, the Blazers’ main retirement-injury benefit. Miles’ return to the Blazers’ cap could cost Portland owner Paul Allen as much as $8 million in luxury tax payments to non-tax paying teams.
Once Miles plays 10 games this season, the $18 million left on his contract returns to the Blazers’ books over the next two years and severely punctures Portland’s opportunity to sign a star player to complement its good young core of players.
I was a little bit shocked to read this. The Portland Trailblazers all season long have been the hot story of the NBA. Greg Oden is playing, Brandon Roy is a fearless leader, LaMarcus Aldridge is some kind of anti-social personality done good, it goes on and on. This is team of the future! Everyone can like these loveable kids!
On top of that, Kevin Pritchard has been heralded as the genius behind it all, Larry Miller the smart guy pulling the strings. This was a smart team, a good team, a team that in a weird way, everyone in the NBA was rooting for because it was such a great turnaround story.
Then they had to go and ruin it. Larry Miller and Kevin Pritchard were willing first to CLAIM Darius Miles off of waivers, then stash him on the sidelines to protect their cap number (the way it would've worked out, they would only need to pay Miles the rest of a minimum contract as long as he didn't play another game this season). That's freakin kidnapping. The NBA smartly denied the claim, but then in a blatantly bully scare tactic, the Blazers sent an email to all 29 teams telling them to stay away, which the players association and league swiftly disregarded.
Now, Miles has been resigned by the Grizzlies, and he'll get his shot to be Kevin Pritchard's favorite 18 million dollar mistake this Friday (probably). I hope he does, but more than that, I hope we as fans can focus on the real redemption story going on here. We've lost track of a real, true NBA redemption story in Darius Miles. This guy, one of the original Jailblazers, has finally returned from what was thought of and diagnosed as career ending injury. He hasn't played more than half of an NBA season since 2004-2005, and only appeared in 40 games in 2005-2006.
Miles, once a rising star in the NBA, was thought dead on the bench, and then the dianoses followed. However, Darius persevered, and now he's back in the league (abiet a 3rd string SF), and playing. That alone is a monsterous accomplishment. So who gives a flying crap about Portland's salary cap? I say we root for Darius for the sake of a comeback, and stuff the money. Anything else would sell a great story short.
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
Wow...
If the Blazers had been allowed to claim Miles, and then had refused to play him, they would have opened themselves up to some major liability, not only from Miles, but also from the insurance company that paid his contract, etc. I guess they figured the cap space was worth the potential exposure, but that’s dirty pool.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on
Jan 13, 2009 10:07 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
It just kinda reeks of scumbag to me, business or not.
Reporter: About a year ago I asked about the Celtics-Lakers thing and you said you'd really only seen it on TV. Now you've been through it, can you talk about playing the Boston Celtics for the NBA championship?
Kobe: It Sucks.
by indeedproceed on
Jan 13, 2009 10:11 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm from Salem, OR
and am a big Blazers fan (I’m one of those who have to hate KG right now for his disrespect to my team, and therefore my home).
But I think you are correct. I realize that the Blazers management feel like they are obligated to pursue every option to improve the team, but this is a case where restraint would have better served.
Miles is a guy who has been really stupid with his life for quite awhile. (Yes the Blazers placed him on a team with likeminded people). But he has at least acted differently to the public lately and at the very minimum my belief in God informs me that I should give the young man a second chance.
Yes, he is putting himself a high risk to doing catastrophic damage to his knee, but that is his choice. I don’t know what it is like to play basketball like D. Miles. Maybe it would be so awesome that I would be wiling to risk my future mobility for another chance to play at that level. He is acting like the character in hero movies that is to old to fight, but walks into the fight anyway because it is what he lives for.
So striving against both his inner and outer failures Miles has tried to make a new start. Let’s applaud him if he succeeds and honor him if he fails. He has at least tried to change for the better in a way bigger than maybe any of us can claim.
While the rule on the books has been terribly unjust to the Blazers, it should have been seen as unconscionable for the Blazers management to make moves that threatened Miles ability to make that choice to try again.
Therefore, despite all of the complicated and valid rationalizations for the actions of the Blazers management, I find it to be at the very least running the up and touching the line of scumbaggery. I have always rooted against the Lakers and the Knicks because of big city money, management, and arrogance. It is disappointing to me that my team would act in a way that mimics the other’s behaviour.
".. is gumby an alien?" - Sophia
by staylost on
Jan 13, 2009 12:09 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
While the rule on the books has been terribly unjust to the Blazers, it should have been seen as unconscionable for the Blazers management to make moves that threatened Miles ability to make that choice to try again.
Really? unjust? I find that to be very funny.
If you want to talk about injustice, how about the Celtics carrying Reggie Lewis’ cap number after he died.
Miles and the insurance company would sue the pants off the Blazers if they had gotten away with their little sham of a waiver claim. Their inability to realize that, yet threaten the rest of the league with litigation is unbelievably ignorant and/or an incredible display of hubris.
When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"
by Green17 on
Jan 13, 2009 1:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You called it
It was a sham of a waiver claim. They knew it would be blocked by the league.
What you are seeing is legal maneuvering to ensure that Miles’ salary is not on Portland’s books unless Miles gets a contract for the rest of the year.
If Darius only gets in a couple of games, Portland will likely win an appeal against his salary being on their books, and this was part of the picture.
This put the league in a tricky position with Darius. Portland was prepared to guarantee his salary for the rest of the season, and the league blocked it. If he doesn’t get a contract for the rest of the season, the league has harmed him. I don’t see how Darius doesn’t win a case against the league, if he doesn’t get a contract.
When teams started talking in the media about screwing Portland, and David Stern apparently was unprepared to do anything about it, Paul Allen, Larry Miller, and their lawyers decided to play hardball. We’re talking about many millions of dollars here.
Don’t forget that it was a league-appointed doctor that said Darius had a career-ending injury. If he was wrong, then Portland has been damaged by a wrong diagnosis by a league-appointed doctor.
It was the league that ruled that the preseason games counted towards the ten games. The CBA doesn’t say that.
- League appointed doctor.
- League ruling on preseason games.
- League decision to block the waivers pick up.
I’m starting to think that Portland’s real target here is not an individual team but the league, and that David Stern is going to start to feel some heat.
You are right, the Reggie Lewis thing was a horrible injustice, far worse than this situation.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on
Jan 13, 2009 2:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just because something unjust happened to you doesn't mean you should be happy when it happens to someone else...
I entirely agree that it was not a fair way to treat the Celtics by making them carry a cap. In that case it is far worse than the one the Blazers are dealing with. But just because you served 10 years in prison unfairly doesn’t mean you should find it funny when someone unfairly serves one.
For your second point, I doubt an office of Paul Allen’s would lack proper legal planning. The inability to realize that…
The talk of suing other teams by Blazer fans, and the Blazer’s by those who don’t like them sounds like kids on a playground yelling at each other that they are going to sue the other. We may have a limited understanding of the legal matters surrounding this issue, but they are not professional opinions. If we were contract lawyers close to the NBA arbitration processes, we wouldn’t be commenting without getting paid.
Regardless, we agree on the main point, I hope, that it matters less whether anybodys methods are successful or not, but that the way it has been played is certainly distasteful when looking at the Blazers.
".. is gumby an alien?" - Sophia
by staylost on
Jan 13, 2009 2:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The situation the Blazers have found themselves in is not what is funny. Your perception that it is unfair to them is what I deemed to be funny. The rule is pretty simple. They asked for an exemption based on an estimate of Miles’ physical ability to play NBA basketball, and received it based on what was required per the CBA. The fact that the estimate was wrong is not a unfair to the Blazers. Those things happen.
I didn’t find the Blazers “threat” to be that bad honestly. It was simply saying that if another team signed Miles to maliciously affect the Blazers, the Blazers reserve their right to sue them. That makes sense to me. I don’t think another NBA team was really scared off or conversely interested as a result of that press release.
When Perk was asked what he thought of Howard winning the gold medal this summer, he responded: "What’s his impression of me after I won a ring?"
by Green17 on
Jan 13, 2009 3:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here's the thing
The fact that the estimate was wrong is not a unfair to the Blazers.
What is unfair is that the estimate was made by a league doctor (not a Portland doctor), and Portland acted in good faith on that estimate (rather than retaining Darius as a player or at least an expiring contract next year), and is now being penalized because the league-appointed doctor’s estimate apparently was wrong. Portland doesn’t have a player, doesn’t have an expiring contract next year, and doesn’t have cap relief.
(Actually, I don’t know if it was wrong, the “estimate” as you call it was based on the fact that he has no cartilage left in that knee, and is at serious risk of severe injury as a result. But that’s somewhat a side issue to this particular discussion, I guess.)
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on
Jan 13, 2009 3:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its not the email
The email doesn’t bother me, it was flawed from the start. what really bothered me is that Portland tried to claim Miles off waivers. They tried to take a guy really putting a lot on the line, a guy really trying in earnest to build something back up that has completely fallen apart, and keep him off the floor. For their cap number. Its not like Marbury where he could’ve gotten out of it, Portland’s entire motif operandi was keeping Miles off the floor, preventing him from completing a comeback. This guy has been saying all the right things, he’s been going to tryouts, heck he’s playing for the freakin Grizzlies, If he wants to come back and another team wants him to play, well frankly I hate to grandstand but its just plain morally and ethically wrong to stop him. That’s what got my gander up.
Reporter: About a year ago I asked about the Celtics-Lakers thing and you said you'd really only seen it on TV. Now you've been through it, can you talk about playing the Boston Celtics for the NBA championship?
Kobe: It Sucks.
by indeedproceed on
Jan 13, 2009 3:55 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Why is that wrong?
Whether he plays or not, Portland still has full liability, but for the contract and for how the contract affects the cap. If the League and Players Association had not approved the medical retirement, and if Miles himself had not signed off on it, then he would still be on the Portland roster where they could play him or not. Or trade him to a team like the Grizzlies, who obviously need veterans to fill up garbage time minutes rather than develop rookies.
I assume Sam Cassel, Bill Walker and POB all want to play. Is it despicable for Doc to keep them sidelined?
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on
Jan 21, 2009 12:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
your assuming intentions
what if portland had decided that resigning miles was in their best interest. play him ourselves for two games or more. resulting in the cap space and salary being readded to the blazers. they end up with the same result but have the expiring contract to dump next season. miles gets to play and blazers dont get the loss of his contract. why would this be construed by the league as a ploy by blazer to get around the cba? seems to me this senerio has as much validity as your assumptions of scumbaggery.
by 2phattoplay on
Jan 18, 2009 6:44 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think
that they could have traded his expiring contract.
Once you waive a guy, he’s not on that contract anymore. He will get paid for it, since it was guaranteed. But if you pick him up again, you only get him on the new contract.
Portland would have been paying Darius two salaries in this scenario, the old guaranteed contract and the new contract for the rest of the year.
I agree that he is wrongly assuming negative intentions. Portland was willing to pay Darius for the rest of the year, which would mean he was getting two salaries. The insurance company would have appealed, and Portland would have had to pay his entire salary, rather than collect part of it from the insurance company. So Darius would have ended up pulling in another chunk of Paul Allen’s money if this had gone through, but Allen would have avoided the luxury tax. That’s IF it was allowed to go through.
But Portland would have known the league would never allow it. So then you have to ask why they would do it? Because they are stupid, and wanted bad publicity for something that wasn’t going to help them at all?
I don’t buy that. So I’m persuaded it was legal maneuvering, and this story isn’t done. Jason Quick, the beat writer for the Oregonian, said recently that not everything has come out, that there is more to this story. He also said it wasn’t a Miller or Pritchard decision, but a Paul Allen decision to send that email, and it was driven by financial motivation. That’s what I said all along.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on
Jan 20, 2009 4:03 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
















