they traded their pick ray allen for marbury that year and i think kg had some influence on tha decisison. i wonder if kg did regret it because the celtics getting ray allen was the thing that got him to nod to sign with the celts. lay off on the marbury deal danny. get another big. you still have cassel and pruitt on the bench

But if he acts up, you simply cut him. No harm. No foul.

i dont like marbury, but he could function similar to cassell last season to provide the immediate offense off the bench. but i worry he will also be like cassell who shoot first, even if no shot was there.

the problem is whether he would be willing to play within the team so as to increase his value for a new contract next year.

unless pruitt gets more minutes as thepg, the second unit still does not have an good passer to get the other players more involved.

but as timepiece said, if marbury acts up even once, cut him.

The “no harm no foul just cut him” theory is flawed. The man is a cancer. The celtics work on chemistry NO ONE in sports, not even TO , has a such a complete record of selfish BS and a trail of team destruction as this clown. The celtics don’t need the distraction and there is no reason to believe that this chump can play on a second team as a role player without being a huge problem. He scores thats it and on every team where he has scored a lot the team has been bad. He can’t play D. There is way to much downside to add this guy to a team that is in first place and does not need to gamble.

I am not even a Celtic fan but will tell you DO NOT sign this guy. He is not the solution to your bench problems. I would love for you to take another none chemistry guy from our Clippers so young people like Eric Gordon can grow. Danny please call Mike Dunleavy before signing Marbury!