Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Hugh Douglas Admits To Stealing From Jaguars

Nobody Puts Baby In The Corner

Babymagic_medium

Yes, I've been waiting to use that headline.

I love how Big Baby has a knack for showing up big when he's not supposed to.  He has had great games against some of the best in the league the last two years.  The games last year against Yao, Duncan, and the Pistons come to mind.  Now he chips in with 16 points, mostly in the fourth quarter.  The rest of the team seemed to be a little sluggish as the Magic were creeping back into the game, but Davis hit some big shots and pulled down some rebounds to boot.  Nice to see after a stretch where everyone was down on him.

Oh yeah, and Pierce was on again, which always helps.  Plus KG was an efficent 8-13 for 16 points.

Dwight Howard?  Just 11 points and 11 boards before fouling out in the 4th.

Nice win.

P.S. Hey Kelly Dwyer, do you like apples?

Star-divide

Boston
 Starters Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  R. Rondo G 39:17 4-10 0-1 1-2 +8 2 8 2 2 1 0 0 4
  R. Allen G 37:47 6-12 0-2 0-0 +9 1 2 2 3 2 1 0 1 12 
  K. Perkins C 25:10 3-5 0-0 1-2 +3 4 6 0 1 0 2 1 3
  P. Pierce F 43:57 8-18 0-1 11-14 +9 2 10 4 2 2 0 1 4 27 
  K. Garnett F 36:04 8-13 0-0 0-0 +5 1 5 1 1 1 0 1 3 16 
 Bench Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  G. Davis 21:00 6-8 0-0 4-4 +3 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 5 16 
  E. House 16:44 0-3 0-1 0-0 +2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
  B. Scalabrine 6:58 0-2 0-0 3-3 +5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
  L. Powe 6:48 0-3 0-0 0-0 +4 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1
  G. Pruitt 6:14 0-1 0-1 0-0 +2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
 Totals 35-75 0-6 20-25 14 40 9 11 7 3 3 27 90
Poll
Who should be the first big off the bench? (most nights)
Leon Powe
622 votes
Big Baby
470 votes

1092 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 83 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Baby was our PJ Brown tonight. Great game by him. He always plays hard. Tonight he played hard and well. We do not win this game without his 4th quarter stroke and hustle. Way to go, BBD.

by footey on Jan 22, 2009 10:50 PM EST reply actions  

Yes!

I like it. Good game by Baby, but Pierce really controlled the game when we were playing well. The Magic are pretty good. Pietrus would have helped.

One thing I have to comment on: Jameer Nelson gets away with a lot of fouls. I’ve noticed this in other games: he’s very strong, and being short and compact he often has the leverage on bigger players and has no hesitation to just ride them off a spot or move under them on a shot. He gets away with it because he is small, as small guys tend to get away with such things.

by Berkcelt on Jan 22, 2009 10:50 PM EST reply actions  

Great

Solid defensive game for the Cs, who showed they can win one day on their 3s and the next day WITHOUT MAKING A SINGLE 3-POINTER all game long. Amazing. Big Baby was awesome, saved the game – I am forced to take back my negative opinions on him; now if he could only lose some weight… Turnovers were under control (though there were still 3 or 4 of them that could/should have been avoided), and energy was up. Excellent game overall.

I dunno… playing like this — not spectacular by very solid, especially on D — Cs could win it all even without another big.

One more thing — HATED the officiating in this game. These guys were just blind. Against BOTH teams. Love the NBA (teams and players), hate the NBA (Stern and his idiot crew of refs).

by DRJ1 on Jan 22, 2009 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

On Baby

It’s not surprising he had two of his better games against Shaq and Howard. The big centers are his best matchups (which is counterintuitive on a superficial level).

I forgot, Perk also had a nice effort (as he often does against Howard).

Re: officiating, I have to agree, officials seemed way off, more than usual tonight. It just seemed like they blew a lot of obvious calls. Of course TNT doesn’t show many replays (instead they put up useless graphics and shrink the screen down to a fifth of the normal size so you can’t see anything).

by Berkcelt on Jan 22, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions  

re: shrinking screen

I almost jumped through my television set when they came out of a timeout with that late in the fourth quarter. Just awful. Good call, Berk.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Jan 22, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Why?

Why is anyone forced to take back anything?

Production is about your body of work, not a single game…the fact that Davis played well last night is encouraging and positive for this team, but his overall player over the past 2 seasons still is riddled with low production and inconsistency.

I’m happy to see him produce well, but i’m not going to re-write my assessment of his overall play until he puts it all together and strings a number of quality games together with real productivity.

Glen Davis now has 6 double-digit scoring games in 133 games played for the Celtics…count me in the wait-and-see category on this one…I like his work against beefy centers defensively to be sure, but when you play 15+ minutes nightly you’ve got to consistently do something in the offense – TAKING the jumper isn’t enough, you’ve got to MAKE it consistently – this hasn’t happened to date…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

If you’re measuring Davis’ worth by points scored, you’re talking a look at about 20 percent of the picture.

There would always be a place for him on a team I coached based on effort alone. It’s mind boggling to me to see people rip into him and then post Free POB threads.

Again, you cannot coach effort. It’s either there or it isn’t.

by CoachBo on Jan 23, 2009 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

i told you

baby’s jumpshot would start falling. it will keep falling too.

pierce looked like he was playing at a totally different (and faster) speed tonight which was good to see.

by reggie35 on Jan 22, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions  

great win, it wasnt as close as the final score indicates either, we dominated that game defensively, and from van gundys interview before the 4th, he agrees. the refs seemed to want to keep it close with those ticky tack fouls on nearly ever magic possesion…Pierce was awesome 25/10 is huge in a game like this, most of the offense ran through him and rondo wasnt as key in this game, but he really helped on the boards and defending jameer good for 3 quarters

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 22, 2009 11:04 PM EST reply actions  

BBD was huge. LOL

great bench production on this florida trip….but once again whats up with powe? dreadful

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 22, 2009 11:06 PM EST reply actions  

Powe’s in a terrible slump.

But Kudos to BBD. This kid has really stepped up his game!

by Bankshot on Jan 22, 2009 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

He certainly has been...

Yet, its funny that Powe’s worst month as a rotation player:

5.5pts/4.7reb/.440FG% in 15mpg

Is extremely statistically similar if not equal to Glen Davis’ BEST month as a Celtic statistically…

6.6pts/4reb/.439FG% in 18.3 mpg

Davis deserves the minutes he’s getting recently as his production as befit his time on the court at least half to 2/3rds of the games over the past 4 weeks. If Powe isn’t producing offensively it makes sense for Davis to play more because he is a bit more sound defensively and can play the Center spot effectively.

But lets not flip the script here on these two…one player has a much more impressive body of work to reference, the other a very short and still somewhat pedestrian stretch going – the difference? One player we are USED TO seeing more from, the other we are NOT…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Disagree, obviously you’re a powe guy, but imo Glen does ALL the little things better, usually powe is just a stat stuffer in short minutes, yet he cant do ANYTHING lately, he doesnt know how how to pass and cant hit point blank shots and has added nothing to his game
  Also, as others have said BBD has had big games at the right times, in his rookie season..that continued last night

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually...

He’s added a lot to his game…but if you don’t see those things i’m not really going to try and convince you…his offensive game has been off, but that’s about it…his defense has been solid all year and he’s picked up his rebounding and defensive intensity over the past 4 weeks while his offense has been off.

I completely don’t agree that Davis does “all the little things” better…its just not true…Powe is in an offensive slump and that is what most people think of when they see him…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Powe isnt that good dude…BBD is better defensively, and Powes rebounding hasnt improved neither has his defense, pretty clear from his playing time, they wouldnt be playing him less minutes if this was the case – nothing in his game has improved if anything regressed. agree to disagree

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure thing...

You go with that man..what do I know about anything when it comes to evaluating player development…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Powe didn’t play much but I thought he was solid. Missed some bunnies, I thought maybe he could have gotten a call on one of them. His D seemed good.

Not that I know much about it (seems flawed to a non-stathead) but it’s interesting that every Celtic who played had a positive +/-.

by Berkcelt on Jan 22, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Powe was 0/3, he cant hit a point blank shot if his life depended on it lately, so dont act like it was the first time, that and he drives me nuts not having any vision whatsoever

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:45 AM EST up reply actions  

His passing eye is much more astute...

People are bitching about how long he holds onto the ball, but that has been directly linked to making better decisions between passing out of the post and making his move…the speed of these decisions must increase, but that’s one of the areas he needed to work on, so i’m good with it…

Powe needs to mix up his MOVES when he does attack and he is certainly slumping on his finishes – but 200 quality finishes around the basket over the past 2 seasons vs. this recent slump doesn’t keep me up at night…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Scalabrine should be getting most of Powes minutes, that says enough

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions  

now if he could only lose some weight

Why lose weight, when one can lose fat, gain muscle, and stay the same weight.

I’d rather see opponents, bouncing off a granite block during an offensive rebound.

by TitleMaster on Jan 22, 2009 11:17 PM EST reply actions  

it’s funny that most people want him to lose some fat and gain an “NBA body”, but he obviously manages just fine how he is.

his energy levels are much better than most players and he sprints up-and-down the court almost every game.

as long as he is playing well it doesn’t matter what type of body he has.

by Ruben Wolkowyski on Jan 23, 2009 2:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Huge BBD

Look, BBD had a great game, for sure. Best I’ve ever seen him play. We all hope he has many more like it or better. But there is no question that he would be quicker and he would be able to jump higher if he lost his baby fat. That’s just physics. As he is, his vertical leap is about 12 inches off the ground. So yeah, he needs to lose weight. Obviously.

by DRJ1 on Jan 23, 2009 3:39 AM EST up reply actions  

That wasnt his best game as a celtic…the Detroit/San Antonio games come to mind from last year

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Hedo Turkoglu - Defensive Poison

Man, Hedo get torched tonight! By the time they moved him off Pierce, it was too late, the game was already in the bag. Honestly, that was one of the worst individual defensive performances I’ve seen all year. I don’t care how many points Turkoglu had. He was killing his team tonight.

by Toine43 on Jan 22, 2009 11:22 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed but...

..did anyone else notice that when Hedo was on offense he seemed to be physically fine and smiling, but once he went on D he would make these facial expressions making it seem like he was hurt, which TNT kept pointing out “Hedo must be hurt out there..He can barely lift his arms for that rebound!”

Seriously, in my opinion, I think he was faking an injury on D due to Pierce destroying him out there!!

by OhioCelticFan on Jan 23, 2009 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

well,well,well-this one was a biggie and yes bbp,pp,kg, but it was a real team effort. no pts for eddie or gabe- so what- they played good team ball. i really disliked howard’s posing in the 1st quarter- looking at his fingers and making faces after made baskets and rebounds. well mr. poserman howard, what happened to you and your hands for the rest of the game. rashard is as smooth at his position as ray is at his. too bad i didn’t see them play much when they were sonics.

by nazzbo on Jan 22, 2009 11:27 PM EST reply actions  

everyone was not down on baby

But a lot of people were and the majority here may well have felt powe was better. its all nonsense anyway. some posters have followed the celts around for years at home and away and see all the practices before the game. a poster wrote about this recently, and mentioned baby is almost always shooting early, as much as anyone else and makes his shots in these practices, at a high %. it was time for him to hit some shots in the games. in practice he makes a fair share of threes but mostly he is solid from 15-18 feet so it was no fluke tonight.

by wahz on Jan 22, 2009 11:27 PM EST reply actions  

Total BS...

There is NO WAY BBD is taking 3 pointers in practice….Doc would kill him if he was wasting time or posessions shooting 3’s…Davis is a below average shooter and that is proven…he needs to keep working on it, but he’s had 3 solid shooting nights in the past 15 games – that’s not very good…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Doc would kill him if he was taking 3’s in practice? um no. why do you think he takes jumpers?
and if that was the case, wouldnt he have killed them for playing football in practice last year during the playoffs? and rondo and ray taking half court shots?

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe fooling around...

…but when the team is actually practicing there is no way that Doc or anyone else is working Davis’ 3 point shooting into anything related to actionable team concepts…no way…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

They shootaround during practices…I dont see why its so hard to belive he practices his 3’s

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Bill, you may be a bit on your muscle so it won't matter what I say

but its not bs and and he does take threes in practice and he takes a lot of them, I am going to say 30 seems about right. He works hardest on his jumper from the left corner, left as in left if you are facing the basket. he is usually out there with Powe, and this year sometimes with POB and Powe, and he works with Cliffiord Ray. So there are the 4 of them out on the court for some of the time with no one else there. baby is ALWAYS in the practices. He has no problem making a good number of these threes and as I have said before around 70% of his 15 -18 footers from the left side. Powe does not work out like this and focuses on his post moves. I dunno what else to say. Get into a game when the doors open. Heck Baby and Cliff Ray have also done it at half time a few times before anyone else has come out as I recall.

by wahz on Jan 23, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

And I want to reiterate that I brought this up in the first place and then again and again, to try to explain why baby is still shooting these jumpers in the game. Doc knows he’s knocking them down in shooting practice and they have focused on it. It makes total sense to me now that they have looked hard at Baby’s game and realized last year if he could develop a solid jump out jumper from 18, that with everything else he does it will really help the team and his game. Cowens had a solid jumper too. If Baby could get a jump hook too, he’d have a nice arsenal

by wahz on Jan 23, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

If...

he continues to play like that, the C’s will make another run for the championship.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 22, 2009 11:34 PM EST reply actions  

I have been tough on BBD

but he was absolutely a beast tonight. Clutch shots to give us that win down the stretch that Rondo tried to give away. (Don’t know where these stats guys come up with 2 turnovers because he had 2 in the last couple minutes of the game alone.) He rebounded the ball well. He shot the ball without thinking like he needs to do to be successful. He did commit a few fouls he shouldn’t have, but a couple were also bogus. Very good bodying up of Howard making it tough for him to back down in. I was very impressed and hope he keeps this up.

That officiating was absolutely stupid. Touch fouls both ways that disrupted the flow of the game. I can’t stand it when refs act like we are there to watch them and not the players. Those guys were awful.

by EJPLAYA on Jan 22, 2009 11:41 PM EST reply actions  

rondo was used differently tonight, and it wasnt affective for his sake, all the offense ran through Pierce and rondo was a spectator on offense most of the night, and then for some reason the ball was in his hands in the final 2 minutes after it hadnt been most of the game..only 2 assists..but he did contribute on the boards, second highest rebounder tonight

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 22, 2009 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

"Everone was down on Baby"?

Huh?

A propos, I wonder what Kyle Dwyler has to say about Baby. He was watching the game tonight, right? Davis is killing the Celtics. Destroying this team.

PER doesn’t account for his defensive attributes. Which are awful. Ruddy awful.

Awful, yeah…

http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/1/12/718211/about-big-baby

by cordobes on Jan 22, 2009 11:53 PM EST reply actions  

I know you don't fall into the camp that...

…values the most recent performance as proof-positive of a player’s future play…let Davis get consistent with these performances before we anoint him…he has 6 career double-digit scoring games in his Celtic career and has shot a terrible percentage overall….439% from the field during his recent “hot streak”…

Love the way he played LAST NIGHT, but its a single night, he hasn’t been burning down the house exactly over the past month…I will say he turned a corner when he has a stretch of productivity befitting such a claim…

PJ Brown, Kurt Thomas, Robert Horry – these players became notable role players because they were CONSISTENT with the roles they played…Davis is the definition of inconsistency to date…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, it's a two way-street

I generally don’t get high or down on players due to such a small sample of games.

However, when Dwyler wrote that article, and many were down on Baby, saying that the only reason Doc was playing Davis was to showcase him, I was of the opinion he was already outplaying Powe – even if the stats didn’t show it at time. But watching the games it was easy to see that Davis was playing better and he still is.

by cordobes on Jan 23, 2009 8:43 AM EST up reply actions  

He is playing better...

…however, it hasn’t been for a substantial period of time and you have to credit the change in rotation to the uptick in play as well…

BOTH Powe and Davis have been far more productive when mixed in with mulitple starters – but because of the minutes available at center and Davis’ improved play, he’s been able to get more run with more starters recently.

Even so, the disparity isn’t all that great. Powe has been much more inconsistent than he was last year, but he’s still having a good amount of quality games overall this season and has improved in a number of areas that are getting no credit – perimeter/recovery defense, deflections, reading double teams, etc…

Davis hasn’t shown any consistency either with his new role of shooting the face-up…I just don’t see a massive shift here…Powe needs to get back in rhythm or he’ll continue to lose some minutes to Davis, but Davis hasn’t been so superior that Powe won’t continue to get chances to do so…last night was not a typical Glen Davis game…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

robert horry was consistent in not giving effort until the playoffs

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Looks like the stifling D is back. Great win. Next up Mavs Celtics seem to like these early games so I’m hoping for a solid win.

by twinbree on Jan 23, 2009 12:26 AM EST reply actions  

So where’s now the BBD haters who wanted him to throw out after getting 1-9 in one game before?

Wish all people here just relax wether they win or lose and dont call any players head in the future. Nice win for the Green. NEXT…

by spoiled on Jan 23, 2009 5:07 AM EST reply actions  

The next time BBD has a bad game, his detractors will be ready to trade him for a bag of peanuts, or trade the whole Celtics bench for Joe Smith.

But you saw a glimpse of BBD’s potential. He will reach that potential with a team other than the Celtics after becoming a free agent in June.

by Brickowski on Jan 23, 2009 7:11 AM EST reply actions  

Yes we did...

…and we’ve seen 36 glimpses of Powe’s potential to 6 of Davis, (double-digit scoring games.)

I don’t understand how people on this board can sit there and point to every game in isolation as proof of their agenda with a player…Glen Davis has strengths as a player, but he has never consistently produced like Powe has.

He’s in a good groove right now and Powe is not, so I have no problem with Davis getting the run as long as he is doing well. But the notion that Davis has some how emerged from the pack as “the guy” flies in the face of established history here.

Powe has to pick up his play, but Davis must do do as well to even approach Powe’s level of consistency…this argument is still only an argument if you eliminate all rational measure and simply use the most recent game history to make a judgment.

I don’t hate Davis, its not my job to play favorites based off hope and emotion…Powe’s been far more productive over the past 2 seasons and a majority of this one as well…even if I’m going to buy into your faluty belief that he’s “peaked” and that Davis is the only one with any development to do, Powe is still substantially more productive by volume of quality games…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 8:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Again, double-digit scoring games have relatively little to do with Davis’ worth to this basketball team.

by CoachBo on Jan 23, 2009 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

That's awesome Bo...

…but when you play 15-20 minutes in a game and are getting a number of looks within the team’s offensive set, you have to also be productive…

“Little things” are important, but not enough to garner long stretches of PT if you are in situations where actual productivity is needed….the same could be said of Scal before this year…its all well-and-good to set screens, play defense, and all that other happy horse-dung, but you’ve ALSO got to produce in your minutes or else your an 8-12 minute place-holder.

The team is relying on Davis hitting that jumper and providing bench scoring in addition to the “little things.”

Don’t sell me the “im a coach and you just don’t understand” line of BS…I deal with coaches on team personnel issues all the time…Davis is at his most effective right now, but there is a reason the team has been shopping for a backup center and its not because Davis doesn’t do the “little things.”

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 9:03 AM EST up reply actions  

easy guys

we’re all just fans on this forum – if you have an opinion of someone’s game, that’s what it is, an opinion, regardless of your credentials

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 23, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Truth is here.

I agree with this assessment.

This is a good old fashioned basketball argument.

I see Baby’s potential. Others see the mistakes and inconsistency. Certainly this year has been a learning year for Glen.

by Tom Halzack on Jan 23, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

That comment of mine was actually supposed to have been under Brickowski’’s comment

by Tom Halzack on Jan 23, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

BBD Detractor Here

I’ll just point out Tony Allen has the occasional gem game, does that make up for 10 stinkers? I actually don’t think BBD is useless, just that he’s not as good as Powe, and Doc should alter his rotation to accommodate that fact.

Longer term the C’s would do well to pick one guy and play him more, but they both are capable of staying in the rotation so for the sake of the other guy, I hope he gets to a team he can get minutes.

What I hate most of all is seeing BBD and Powe playing together, anecdotally that lineup (whicih usually had House at the point) seemed to get outscored by a large margin.

by Brendan on Jan 23, 2009 7:34 AM EST reply actions  

Accept

BBD’s best games has come in big games against good teams. That says a lot, imo. This guy will become a consistent player at some point. The great thing too is that BBD is only in his second year and still has a lot of improvement in him. This kid has good upside to be a great bench player. If he keeps it up, we won’t need a Joe Smith.

by Bankshot on Jan 23, 2009 7:48 AM EST up reply actions  

did you mean

except? or do you want me to accept that? Powe’s best game came in the nba finals – so what does that mean?

by Brendan on Jan 23, 2009 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Back when K- Dwyl said BBD was killin’ ‘em, the infant was rimming those jumpers & commiting bad fouls. Davis has been practicing and stepped it up. Let’s hope he stays on track, because opponents are going to be leaving him, Rondo, Eddie, Gabe and Leon open looks (ps memo to Leon, you needs a 10-footer in your arsenal).

by Tenacious D on Jan 23, 2009 7:45 AM EST reply actions  

added a special note to Kelly at the end

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 23, 2009 7:54 AM EST reply actions  

nope, I didn't

and I’m pretty sure I piled on in the comments, so I’m guilty as anyone – I just wanted to throw that in there for fun

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 23, 2009 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

TNT

Did any one notice that no matter what the score the commentator just HAD to say well with 3-4 three pointers the magic are still in this game. It must of been said like 5 times a quarter and by the end of the game i was tired of it. I kept thinking well if the C’s make 3-4 three pointers we will be up by 20.

by Lasky21 on Jan 23, 2009 8:16 AM EST reply actions  

TNT was obnoxious last night…using Orlandos 4 days off as a crutch(I’’’ll take the time off rather than be tired), contiually showing hedo in agonizing pain, the refs were god-awful trying to keep the magic in the game and Gary and webber at halftime saying the magics players deserve to be all stars over the celtics

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Payton and Webber

are both idiots!!! Payton is a known hater and Webber is just annoying…bring back CHARLES, TNT! Seriously, the craziest thing I heard was when Payton said he was better than John Stockton, the all time assist and steal leader.

by OhioCelticFan on Jan 23, 2009 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

It's The Price We Pay For Being Champs

We weren’t on TNT when we were losing. Winning has it’s price for us fans.

by TrueGreen on Jan 23, 2009 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Boxed Out - Plus Minus

Love how everyone was a plus when they were on the floor. not sure how rare or common that is, but it indicates a consistent performance. great effort all around.

by help D on Jan 23, 2009 8:49 AM EST reply actions  

added a poll

just for fun

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 23, 2009 8:55 AM EST reply actions  

So people wanting Powe the first off the bench would rather have KG sit down first? and have a frontcourt of Perk/Powe? call me crazy but Id rather see Perk sit first and go with BBD/KG

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 23, 2009 9:02 AM EST reply actions  

Powe HAS been...

The first big off the bench and still is used more often on nights when he’s in an offensive groove….KG and Powe see a decent amount of time together in the frontcourt when Powe is on his game…but when Powe isn’t into it offensively Doc has used Davis – and recently Scal – and let KG limit his matchups against centers…

I think its really as simple as Powe’s offensive production – when he’s on his game and scoring early he stays out there because his defense is solid and he is effective…when Powe isn’t grooving offensively the team goes to Davis because he can play center more effectively…

Bottom line – Powe needs to get back into an offensive rhythm, but I think he will before too long…he’s been too good for too long to simply fade away…and the competition he’s seeing from Davis isn’t all that amazing – its quality, but its not been world-beating…

by BillfromBoston on Jan 23, 2009 9:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Give it up.

Powe sucks right now. You weren’t saying BBD needed more minutes to get into a rhythm when he wasn’t playing well.

by Bankshot on Jan 23, 2009 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Rotations

Doc has a pretty strict time limit for KG in the first quarter and even the first half. KG will sit after so many minutes regardless of what is going on or who will come in or what combinations are best. He will come back in the second quarter pretty much the same time every game. Much to Perk’s credit he has cut down on his early fouls so Doc can be consistent in whatever rotation he wants. As to Powe vs BBD I think it’s situational. Against bigger bigs, such as Howard, BBD will come in to play a Howard-type.

by TrueGreen on Jan 23, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Dwight Howard

Is Howard injured? In the first quarter after hitting a few shots he was constantly looking at his hand as if it were ?hurt. He only seemed to do this when he made a shot. Fortunately for him he had lots of time last nite for his ?injury to heal. And, is it legal for Howard to remain in the lane for more than three seconds on defense when Perk is at the top of the key setting picks for Ray Allen? Oh yeah, the announcers explained away Howard’s off nite by saying he arrived late because he was stuck in traffic.

by TrueGreen on Jan 23, 2009 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

Grind It Out Game

This game was one of these (grind it outers) which I think are more significant as to the state of a team than blowouts one way or the other. This was a playoff type game. I thought Orlando played some pretty good defense, but not as good as the C’s.

by TrueGreen on Jan 23, 2009 9:53 AM EST reply actions  

I wholeheartedly agree about the grind-it-outness and defense played. Orlando plays pretty well defensively, I was surprised how physical they are—Rashard Lewis, who I’ve always thought of as very soft, in particular surprises me continually going back to last year. Credit here has to go directly to Van Gundy, methinks.

by Berkcelt on Jan 23, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Gary Payton was, in fact better than John Stockton— at least until Payton became the Mitten instead of the Glove.

by Brickowski on Jan 23, 2009 11:30 AM EST reply actions  

Uh,,,

…no, he wasn’t. Not even close.

by cordobes on Jan 23, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

does SVG...

put a shock collar on dwight howard that zaps him with 50KV whenever he steps out of the paint on D? how was he not whistled ONCE for defensive 3 sec?

by eat ur wheaties on Jan 23, 2009 12:19 PM EST reply actions  

BBD

Developing a jumper has added to BBD’s ability to score. He’s a lot more effective with a consistent midrange shot. His defensive quickness has always been strong. Establishing an offense game that can work, significantly improves BBD’s game. Too early to say for sure, but if he can consistently nail the midrange, then thats a different BBD. I would also agree that BBD can bring little things to the team. He is quick enough, and big enough, to set very effective picks, screens, block outs. This is only his second year. And he needs to get familiar with the refs.

by Bozo on Jan 23, 2009 12:33 PM EST reply actions  

There is no Powe vs. Davis...

…unless you’re Danny trying to decide whether to keep one or the other. (I think they’re likely to keep both.) Reason: Celts play opportunistic basketball, as they should. Whoever’s hot gets the minutes… and the ball. If Eddie makes his first 2 or 3 treys, he stays in and gets the ball. If Baby starts hitting those jumpers and playing great, he becomes the go-to guy for the day. If Powe (ever) has a great game, he’ll stay in. Did you see PP looking for Baby to pass to?? That’s great stuff… that’s a TEAM for ya.

Who’s better? Depends on which day. Changes all the time. Powe is in a deep funk right now… can’t even make layups and dunks for some reason. But he’ll break out of it one of these days. Baby is inconsistent, great on some days. But Powe is physically ready to play all the time. Baby is fat (surprise!) (which is why announcers all over the league always chuckle when he’s playing — except last night), and he will NEVER be the best he can be until he loses the extra weight. Basketball is a game of running and jumping, but Baby can’t jump worth a damn right now because, hello? – he’s trying to move about 300 pounds straight up! Another thing about BBD’s great Magic game – keep in mind that he hit most of those shots uncontested, because the Magic didn’t think he was a threat. If he becomes a threat, opponents will start guarding him for the jumper, and then he has to make those shots under duress, which he has not shown he can do. Remember, the kid can only jump a few inches off the ground.

But if BBD ever got in shape (a fantasy, I think), he would be the better player of the two, because Powe’s only got the inside game when he’s hot.

by DRJ1 on Jan 23, 2009 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

I have been saying it for what feels like forever. .. ..

I knew Big Baby could shoot, last year I remember reading he was shooting almost 70% in practices. This year with his expanded role. . .I knew it was just a matter of time. The Portland game incident on national TV took me back a bit, thought maybe he was trade bait.

But I am thoroughly impressed/relieved that he has turned it all around since then. one of the few bright spots of that slump was Baby and Powe leading the defense of the second unit, for the last 3 games of that slump. the bench was actually outdefending the starters. . . .. . .then Phoenix happened, and Big Baby showed up. and then Orlando.

of course his shooting is an abberation and won’t likely happen again for a LONG time. But all things considered, I look forward to big baby being a Celtic for a long time to come.

and by the way, did anyone but me notice that Rondo’s shot has been falling pretty consistently lately?

by Jdzspace on Jan 24, 2009 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Observations / Questions
Bigstock_shamrock_-__1306880-1_small
PAMPLONA? ILLINOIS
Small
Gasol, Deron, or Have Faith In Rondo?
Small
This Team is Complete Garbage
Small
Frustrations..
Small
Rondo and back to backs
Small
Steve Kerr on Rondo's jump shot: "It gets frustrating for the Celtics"
Small
Debunking The "Build around Rondo" Myth
Small
What's up with Phoenix? Is a trade brewing?
Small
Look to Denver

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi