Yep, Another Marbury Post
Sorry, but the news just keeps coming out and I keep passing it along because it is more interesting than dissecting the Wizards woeful ways.
The New York Post talks to Marbury all the time it seems. He writes a blog for them sometimes too. So they felt it necessary to check with Steph on the Marc Stein rumor.
The banished Marbury said he would be "honored" to play for the Celtics, admitted they are on his short list, but denied an ESPN.com report he has made a decision to join Boston if he gets released by the Knicks New York Knicks .
Marbury said Boston has not made an offer. A source close to the situation said the Celtics wouldn't be Marbury's No. 1 choice either because of the limited role, backing up emerging point guard Rajon Rondo.
Another source said Celtics president Danny Ainge has interest in Marbury, as has been reported here since the summer, but Ainge wonders if a buyout will ever be worked out. Marbury prefers to join a playoff-caliber team in a starting role, though the Celtics could be the pick if his only options require coming off the bench.
That just about covers the topic. We won't get any new real news on this until he reaches a buyout because....
- The Celtics can't comment or express interest in him publicly, that's tampering.
- Starbury and his agent will never say that the Celtics are the first choice because they would lose leverage in the buyout talks.
- Half of what we have heard and will hear will contradict other things you hear and a lot of it will be lies or subterfuge. So take it all with a grain of salt.
If and when Steph and the Knicks negotiate a buyout, then we can see what really happens from that point on. With the Celtics visiting New York (and the NY media) tomorrow, I'm sure we'll get plenty more breathless rumors and reports on his status. I'll try to spare you too many updates from here out, but no promises.
Comments
i dont think its necessary to put extra time for those kind of RUMORS at this time. As far as i read from NY POST (as im following this Marbury Saga too) NY GM wanted a buy out but there’s an option that he (marbury) will not play in East. So i dont think that it will happen soon mostly Boston is involve.
And beside, they need to fix this mess first, and release him then we have a good time for talking about the possibilty of marbury joining this team.
Im tired of Rumors, mostly if NY Knicks is the one involve. Because they dont know how to handle a situation.
by spoiled on
Jan 3, 2009 1:07 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
If Marbury has a starting role, it won’t be a contending team, even if it was before adding Marbury.
On paper, Marbury would be a good fit in MN or GS, although I wouldn’t want him polluting my young players.
Best fit is probably Houston.
by Brickowski on
Jan 3, 2009 2:27 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Starting Job
If he wants a starting job the best thing the Celtics can do is lose his number. I wouldnt trust him to be a good soldier even if he “accepted” a back up role. Its just not worth it.
by njnick on
Jan 4, 2009 1:21 AM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
sounds about right to me, Nick
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Jan 4, 2009 3:23 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What about Miami? That was the talk previously. I could see Starbury down there quite easily. Chamlers seems to be doing OK, but it’s hard to see Miami doing anything big this year with a rookie second rounder running the point. They’re not going to win the title this year, but they can/should be a playoff team.
by theBird on
Jan 3, 2009 2:42 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Knicks don't want Miami
I believe it was in the NY Post article (strangely posted on the boston.com celtics blog) that Walsh said he didn’t care about Marbury going to Boston, but Miami was different because they are (supposedly) competing for a playoff spot with the Knicks. There’s nothing the Knicks can really do other than drag out the buyout talks to prevent that from what I gather. Stein said teams can’t make written (ie enforceable) agreements about not playing in one conference or another.
Stein also brought up a good point about Miami being just under the luxury tax threshold. Crossing that line is prohibitive for them. My guess: they’d probably have to dump someone on an under the cap team to absorb Marbury without going over the lux tax line.
by Berkcelt on
Jan 3, 2009 2:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Know what...
if the rumor comes from Stein or Bucher, it must be really just a rumor. They make it up. I much rather listen to Stephen A., he makes sense.
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
by Jeff_Fuller_49 on
Jan 3, 2009 3:04 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Just believe the opposite of what steven says.
That’s of course, if you can understand him.
I have never heard steven i smith say anything that makes sense.
I think we need to have him interview marbury so we can all be subjected to shared incoherence.
by Finkelskyhook on
Jan 3, 2009 5:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It wouldnt make much sense that Walsh and the knicks dont want him to go to a team in the east, they wont even play him and consider him a cancer and what not…wouldnt they want him to go to a team they are contending with a playoff spot with assuming he’ll tear down that team?
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 3, 2009 3:05 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Theoretically
Yeah, that makes sense. But if he does help a team, especially one in direct competition, they will look bad (or I should say worse, really). Honestly, he does have quite a few major incentives to play well: new contract, revenge, legacy, and a championship (if he comes to a team like the Celts or Lakers). I gotta think he cares about at least two of those. I guess “revenge” or spite or whatever we’ll call it, could make him do dumb things…but you know what I mean…
by Berkcelt on
Jan 3, 2009 3:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Probably because adding him to an east opponent's roster helps the Knicks.
by Finkelskyhook on
Jan 3, 2009 5:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That depends
on whether they’re really committed to making the playoffs or tanking for the lottery, doesn’t it, FSK?
The Guru and I are having quite a time having to wrap our heads around the possibility of this guy becoming part of this beloved team of ours. I’m sure you understand the sentiments…
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Jan 4, 2009 3:25 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Professor, if the Knicks were not committed to a playoff spot, Marbury would be starting for them.
by Finkelskyhook on
Jan 4, 2009 2:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hard to get a smile out of me after a game like tonight's
but that one did it. Thanks, FSK.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Jan 5, 2009 12:29 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep another report
and Yep we still have the best winning percentage in the NBA – sounds like a perfect time to bring in a proven bag of poison.
StarBURIED said he would “be honored to play for the Celtics” – I am sure he would. The only problem is that he is not worthy of being in the NBA let alone wear the green. Loser, Quitter, Thugster…..he has done nothing for the NBA except give it a bad rap
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on
Jan 3, 2009 3:30 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ainge Has Interest
Another source said Celtics president Danny Ainge has interest in Marbury…
I love this quote. Ainge has interest in anyone on earth that plays basketball if he (Danny) sees only the remotest possibility that this player could help our team. That’s his job. His work ethic is so good that everyone knows Danny would have interest in any player, including Marbury. I wonder if the same could be said of other GM’s. I wish it could because then the rumors would have Marbury going elsewhere and we wouldn’t need to be talking about this.
by TrueGreen on
Jan 3, 2009 8:22 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Boston hasn't made an offer?
That seems obvious since nobody is allowed to unless Marbury actually gets bought out. Similarly, the Knicks can’t control where he goes, so all this talk about they won’t let him go here or there doesn’t make sense. Since nobody can even talk about or to him until and unless he gets bought out, the Knicks have absolutely zero say where he goes, their involvement only extends as far as coming to an agreement with Marbury financially. If/when that is worked out, he would be free to sign with any team in the league.
by KJ33 on
Jan 3, 2009 8:24 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Trying To See The Pluses Of Marbury Coming Here (For Low Dollars)
Marbury MIGHT add scoring to the bench. But, our entire team is based on Defense first. It’s said that Marbury can’t or won’t defend. The same was said of Ray Allen and Paul Pierce. Let’s say Marbury can and would defend. So we assume Marbury can score and defend. Now let’s remove Rondo from the equation. If M comes here we must assume that he will be the 1st pg off the bench. When Cassell came last year, just before the trade deadline he was never able to get the hang of Doc’s system. He couldn’t help us during the season or in the playoffs. If M comes here when will he come and will he, assuming he’s willing, be able to understand the system here? And if he does how many points will he add to the bench or how many points will he stop with his defense? The one thing M does better than any of our pg’s is take it to the basket and finish or draw fouls. This is the only thing he brings that adds to the bench. I just don’t see this deal happening. Time is better spent working with the second unit to improve their defensive mindset and I would love to see Gabe become a bigger part of the mix and give him a half season to get the experience he needs. The only addition I would make to this team is a defensive-minded big who could play near the basket and 18-20 feet out and who could be a major player in team defense; i.e., anticipating moves and taking charges or at least throw the opponents offense off on a few possesions a game. Scals could possibly be that guy. (OK now let me have it!). I don’t know enough about Joe Smith.
by TrueGreen on
Jan 3, 2009 8:36 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
If you’re trying to see the plusses, the only thing your post should say is TrueGreen.
There are none.
by Finkelskyhook on
Jan 4, 2009 2:07 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Buy Out
I don’t think the knicks are even going to buy him out, so these rumors mean nothing.
by Champzilla on
Jan 3, 2009 9:35 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
There's nothing positive that Starbury brings...
That his negatives wouldn’t overwhelm.
And yes, these rumors seem way too rumorish to mean anything.
Next…
by Big_Easy on
Jan 4, 2009 12:06 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs















