CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NBA Twitter List

What's Wrong With The Celtics?

Celtsloss_medium

I'm sure a lot of non-Celtics fans will be stopping by the blog to find out "what is wrong with the Celtics."  I'm also sure that we are all trying to figure that out ourselves. We can't figure out how to fix it if we don't know what's wrong.

So let's take inventory shall we?  We'll even make this interactive.  I'll start this list and you folks can help me add to it.  As you make points in the comments below, I'll try to add the best ones to this list.  (note: these are in no particular order)

  • Every team is geared up to play the Champs
  • This team is weary and tired from a road trip
  • The veterans are getting old and can't bounce back like they used to
  • The team in general is tired after a short offseason
  • The team is mentally tired and lacking motivation after winning it last year
  • This team struggles against young, athletic teams
  • The team seems to have lost its focus, in particular on defense
  • The bench is just not very good - ("badly constructed, with no size, little ballhandling, a shortage of outside shooting, very little versatility and not enough quality.")
  • Rondo has been struggling lately and teams are game-planning for him
  • Some minor injuries including KG's calf and Tony Allen's ankle
  • No Posey, No PJ Brown
  • Too many turnovers
  • No backup center over 6'9 worth playing
  • Too easily distracted by trash talk or officiating

Ok, what else do I need to add to the list? (your comments added after the break)

Star-divide

  • Not using Leon Powe effectively
  • Lack of ball movement
  • Lakers game threw them off mentally?
  • Doc Rivers unable to find right rotations
  • Reluctance to play younger players? Or perhaps inability of younger players to earn playing time? (Includes Gabe, O'Bryant, and the rookies)
  • Not closing out teams in the clutch

Bonus Links on this same subject:

0 recs  |  Comment 116 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I’d clarify the bench issue, Jeff, and make it a single issue. The bench is badly constructed, with no size, little ballhandling, a shortage of outside shooting, very little versatility and not enough quality. It’s essentially Leon Powe and a collection of end of the bench – and NBDL – guys.

by CoachBo on Jan 7, 2009 8:45 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'll post the counter argument.

We’re on opposite poles on this matter of the bench. The biggest problem with the bench is Doc’s limited and inproper use of it. It starts with his reluctance to play the right point guard, Pruitt, his lack of use of Scalabrine, his over reliance on House, and his refusal to play O’Bryant (who, CoachBo, everyone and his brother knows you consider to be dog-meat).

I believe Pruitt may be a fine backup point guard (for essentially a combo guard), and in the absence of a more confidant and skilled veteran, I expect the second unit can more than make do with O’Bryant. But Doc needs to play the bench more at this point in the season.

by no kidding on Jan 7, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The bench kept us in the game last night.

There were people in the chat last night doing this same mantra of blaming the bench for everything. It’s like they’re too busy listening to each other and didn’t watch the game.

The team lives and dies with Rondo. He’s hitting the same wall that he hit this time last year when he looked as rattled as he does now. He’ll be fine and so will the team. So will the bench…..as long as the marbury idea is nothing but a rumor.

Let me instantly change my mind. I just heard Jamelle Hill agree with my accessment. We’re doomed. Jamelle is wrong almost as often as steven i smith.

by Finkelskyhook on Jan 7, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh god, Jemelle hill? I love how its important, important news when the celtics lose, they cover it like its the superbowl over at espn when we lose

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

- no longer going to Leon in the post with a shooting option to kick out to;

- serious lack of movement on offense — both ball and player; settling for peirce isos at the top of the key WAY too often. (reminds of 2006-07 — yikes).

by ssspence on Jan 7, 2009 8:50 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

So true @ lack of movement, that was the first thing that popped into my head. Offence looks static.

- Dirk

by Kiorrik on Jan 7, 2009 9:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One word LAKERS

That really messed them up I guess they were on this high and then they made them come down. Some how we have to bounce back and when the rematch comes we will be focus again.

by illestmcsgt on Jan 7, 2009 8:56 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Please, Thats not the reason

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and you know everything right?

You can laugh all you want when we were winning almost every game before Christmas then loss to the Lakers. After that we started playing badly and you telling me that’s not the reason. Please go ahead and prove me wrong because I would like to know what reason you think we are losing games we should be winning.

by illestmcsgt on Jan 7, 2009 9:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OH and you know everything right?

losing to the lakers is gonna make this team get bad bench play, exhasuted, injured and old? I think some of us celtics fans are the ones still rattled about the lakers loss, it coule be argued the celtics are still rattled over losing to portland and the whole 6 men on the court thing….the celtics were having all the same issues before the lakers game, they were just finding a way to win…its more about being not very good on the road, nothing to do with the lakers…why would they fall apart after barely losing to a team they crushed in the finals? that makes no sense whatsoever

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 9:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When did I say I know everything LMAO

It makes perfect sense to me after they lost to the Lakers teams got confidence and Celtics lost theirs. Once they lose their confidence then they start making mistakes and will start not playing like a championship team anymore. I have hope they will move on from it and gain the old confidence they had before.

Seriously, you keep targeting people on here and trying to make them look bad. I’m not sure why nobody will do anything about it because we ALL have opinions. But, all you want to do is criticize other people for their thoughts. Right when I got here you seem to be the only person who has a problem with my view on what’s going wrong with the Celtics. I’m a fan of them just like you and if you want to go back and forth about who’s right or wrong then that will lead to no where.

by illestmcsgt on Jan 7, 2009 9:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

take it easy guys

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough, if thats your opinion, so be it… Im not targeting you either…I find if funny how bothered you get from me saying “Oh and you know everything” when All i did was use what you said, but anyways… theres more to it than just losing to the lakers…so if they lost to the cavs can we expect them to completly pack it in?

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I strongly doubt that's the reason.

I think that the Celtics guys know that they’re a better team, and this team is made of proven veterans, not a like the Lakers a mixture of former Champs (Fisher/Kobe) and a lot of players that haven’t proved anything so far (Gasol, Odom, Vujacic). If this wasn’t the case, your explantion would be reasonable. But in my mind it’s not.

And luckily we haven’t seen anything silly like Tony Allen claming he won’t wear yellow until they’ve beaten the Fakers. And I doubt we will!

by Shots on Jan 7, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

right, and I’ll give him this…Losing to the Warriors was related to the Lakers, than we came out blew out the kings, went into Portland wanting to win, playing to win, but havent been the same since the 6 men on the court…

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, that’s probably spot on.. We’ve heard that the team doesn’t think much about the schedule ahead, why would they think of the games in the past then? It wasn’t like they took a bad beating in LA anyway. If it had been a horrible, horrible blowout, maybe the game would be in their heads. But they went into that game as if it was another game on the road and most likely forgot it after they left California..

by Shots on Jan 7, 2009 10:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Leon took two shots last night. Count em: two. One was a put-back.

by ssspence on Jan 7, 2009 9:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

MattD

Agree with ssspence: they’re getting overly reliant on exploiting individual match-ups rather than running the normal offense.

When we’re moving the ball on offense, we’re very good: Rondo gets lanes to drive to the hoop, Ray gets open 3s, KG gets good looks at his 16-foot jumpers, Perk gets easy dunks. When the ball stops because we’re trying to exploit match-ups, that individual player might be successful but the offense overall stalls. Rondo’s man helps off of him, KG gets doubled, etc. I’ve noticed this the past few games: lots of Piece posting up PGs who have switched on to him, and he’s put up great numbers individually, but all the other aspects of the offense have suffered.

Similarly, the 2nd unit had a number of reliable plays last year (that didn’t rely on Posey, thank you), and they’ve gone away from them this year in favor of more one-on-one play. When was the last time House and Powe ran a pick and roll with Powe going toward the basket? That was a reliable play all last year, and even at the start of this year, but they simply haven’t run it at all in the past month. Instead it’s been lots of iso stuff with TA, Powe, etc.

by MattD on Jan 7, 2009 9:05 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Pierce pick & backdown PG's (13 series?)

started during the win streak— and was a big part of what we were doing… seems we haven’t gone to it enough in recent games, particularly in OT last night after PP was killing it in the 4th

by datruthyall on Jan 7, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That actually might be the only thing we’re still doing and having success doing

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

other teams have scouted the c’s and figured out how to beat them and either our coach or our players do not have the flexibility to make the needed adjustments. we also have no one to tie the bench to the starters and are relying on the starters to pick up the bench.

by nazzbo on Jan 7, 2009 9:05 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'm not so much upset with the 2-5 slump as I am...

…grateful for the 19 game winning streak. As I look at it right now, the Celtics are lucky to be right in the mix for the best record in the league, and it’s become apparent that they’re not going to be able to coast to HCA like last year. Without that winning streak, the Cavs and Lakers could’ve been pulling away by now. But slumps happen to every team. The Cavs haven’t had one yet, and neither have the Lakers. And we’re still right there in the mix.

But they need to figure things out pretty quickly, because while every team slumps, there’s no guarantee that the Cavs slump will be as bad as what the Celts are going through right now.

by CelticsWhat35 on Jan 7, 2009 9:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Lakeshow

Yup. I agree with the dude above. The Lakers loss killed them psychologically.

http://lexnihilnovi.blogspot.com/2009/01/so-what-gives.html

by Page_and_Plant on Jan 7, 2009 9:13 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Thats silly, if thats really the reason, they should be slapped…and its not so

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 9:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's All Tony Allen's Fault

It’s obvious, isn’t it? If we had James Posey we’d be 36-0.

by Brickowski on Jan 7, 2009 9:16 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Brickowski

Best straw man arguments in CB. He never misses one.

This team could lose 20 consecutive games and Brick would still be saying that this roster is perfect and no help is needed.

by cordobes on Jan 7, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

easy now

no calling out of other posters please – I don’t care how frustrating the team is, don’t take it out on each other

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not calling him out

He certainly agrees with me. A straw man argument is a straw man argument (nobody said we’d be 36-0 with Posey) and he certainly can recognize one and he indeed believes that this roster doesn’t need personnel changes, he has stated it multiple times.

by cordobes on Jan 7, 2009 9:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

on this paticular subject, i tend to agree with Brick, we can win the title with this current roster. would I love PJ to come back, sure, but overall its about our starters being better than any other set of starters in the league, and our team playing better D and being more cohesive than any other unit in the L, which they are.

by D Dub on Jan 7, 2009 1:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Its not all about Tony Allen, but his inconsistent game played a big part.
And for me, using James Posey as a big reason of fall out is just nonsense. They won so many games without Posey. The problem right now is on the main core itself and its dragging the bench down into it. And yes they are lack of big man on the bench to counter those athletic big[s] of opposing team.

by spoiled on Jan 7, 2009 9:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well, we lead the league in turnovers, teams know this and are told to capitilize on it….we are the champs and not playing like it, we’re a defensive team that gets rattled if we get a taste of our own medicine, and teams are coming out matching our defensive intensity that they expect from us and we’re rolling over…
KG, Rondo, Bench all a problem right now as well

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 9:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

getting rattled

in the games over the holidays I did not see Celts on the bench cheering on the Celts on the floor. when did they become so disinterested? last year the team had confidence in one another, that each would do their job, that each one would put the team first.

i have not seen that on the sidelines or even much on the court recently.

by Thruthelookingglass on Jan 7, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Posey led the cheering from the bench last year…I dont think its quite the same without him, the chemistry isnt there

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have seen a game or two with TA working it from the bench, but yeah, the chemistry isn’t there. And it certainly wasn’t in any of the losses I watched.

by Thruthelookingglass on Jan 7, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Best comment so far

Except Rondo played well on offense last night. Still we win the game if Ray’s normally automatic jumpers drop. I also agree with sspence that we aren’t starting 2nd team O with pass in to Leon. That was very effective during the good streak.

by Wildblu1 on Jan 7, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rondo played well? Are you serious? .

Nine turnovers!!!
Rondo has been a huge part of our problem and his road woes continue

by Jaycelt on Jan 7, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thats why i dont believe that losing james Posey is key reason, though he played a big part on Celtics game. If you watch james Posey in NO game’s, what best he gave to them? Ohh yeah at least 2 or 3 games that he shoot those clutch play and turn the team to win. But what more?

So, regarding Celtics slump its inner problem that they need to address and fix immediately before other teams complately capitalize on it.

by spoiled on Jan 7, 2009 9:46 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

UM

 Posey is giving the hornets alot bro, sorry but he’s shooting his best fg and 3p fg %’s of his career and giving them everything they need when needed, hes arguably there 3rd best player so far this year

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 9:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe you are right on that bro, as i never follow their (NO) games closely and individual stat.
But his absence should not be a very big issue on Celtics slump right now, as we can see how they’re winning in this current Roster.

I suspect a lot on how the coach are using the Bench, they should give more PT on them and insert with the Starter. I mean rotation is so bad, Doc is completely using the whole bench againts opposing team.

let POB and GABE play more consistent minutes..

by spoiled on Jan 7, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

KG needs rest

Jeff, another one.

KG looks aweful. Not sure if he’s more injured than he’s letting on, or just tired. They spent so much emotional and physical energy proving to the world that they wouldn’t let up after winning last year, they’re exhausted. It shows particularly severely on the big guy. He needs rest.

To quote Jim Mora: I don’t care who you play. If you’re going to lose games in the middle of the year at the expense of the longevity of your stars, get some kids out on the floor for energy and experience and / or shuffle the bench rotation. Get Walker out there 10 minutes a night. Throw POB out there for 10 as well. What’s the worst that happens, we lose? Well it’s happening in spite of this to begin with.

Shake things up a little to loosen the knot that’s strangling the team at the moment.

by ssspence on Jan 7, 2009 9:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

they all need rest

I covered that in one of my original bullets

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How about the coaches?

Haven’t seen anyone call them out yet. It’s Doc’s job to get the guys motivated and keep them focused and they seem to be neither. Some questionable substitution patterns also. Last night the C’s finally made a run with Powe and Baby in the game and get a decent lead and as soon as KG came back in the Cat’s made another run to take the lead. maybe he’s hurt, but if so he needs to take off until he’s well. Also with Paul being the only Celtic with a hot hand, he plays the least minutes of the 3. If we are going to play like the 06-07 team at least turn Paul loose and see if he can win a couple of games by himself.

by dmick34 on Jan 7, 2009 9:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Good point, Panic is written all over Docs face for the last couple of weeks, either he knows something bad that we do not or hes in a mental slump himself, hes been terrible lately in just about every way, rotations, motivations, body language….terrible

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Done

Doc has called himself out after the Knick’s game. Cross this off the list.

by TrueGreen on Jan 7, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In Docs defense

Last night Pierce’s minutes had a lot to do with foul trouble.

But I agree that Doc doesn’t seem to notice when one of the Big 3 are hot.
He sticks to his rotations come hell or high water.

by Jaycelt on Jan 7, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That is Perfect

Thank you Jeff for doing my rant for me. Absolutely perfect! My money is on Cleveland out of the East this year. Love the Green but your analysis is spot on!

by richardlight on Jan 7, 2009 9:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Im not going to take any other team over Celtics even they loss 20 games.
But this current problems should be fix..

by spoiled on Jan 7, 2009 9:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

"They come in and intimidate you and try to punk you," Augustin said. "But if you don’t back down from them, they kind of fold."

Quote from DJ Augustin, and hes 100% correct….and its being stated in every single locker room around the league…basically we’ll roll over if you dont

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

This discussion is inherently flawed

The only difference is that now the team is losing close games. During the winning streak they were winning them. Generally teams win 50% of those games. Things are just balancing out. Those who thought this team was nearly as good as the 26-2 record were being delusional.

Therefore, this post is entirely nonsensical.

by cordobes on Jan 7, 2009 10:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

but you bring up a good point – the team isn’t finishing out games well – something the players have pointed out

also, your point is that this team is the same as it was when we were winning, if so, I would still say that the team has issues they need to work on

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 10:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You may disagree

but with what exactly?

by cordobes on Jan 7, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you think the discussion is inherently flawed

I think it is a very viable analysis – the team is losing games, I want to know why

even if you think it is just an evening out of the record, my take is “ok fine, but when the team was winning, there were things wrong with the team too – so lets look at them”

it makes perfect sense to take inventory of the flaws of this team – if not, then I’m wasting a lot of time on this blog (which may be so anyway)

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, okay....

Yeah, my take is that the flaws haven’t changed because of the loses. Analyzing the flaws at the light of a losing period may trick our perception, I think. It’d make more sense to do this when the team was winning than now, I think the answers would be more interesting and probably more accurate.

The problem of this team is that it lacks more role-players of better quality. I’m not surprised. Those who believed that Tony was remotely as good (or better!) than Posey, that POB could be backup center, that Rondo would be consistently at an All-Star level, that all our youngsters would develop mightily, that Bill Walker was a lottery talent that would contribute right away, that Miles was a steal, that Powe was going to be good enough to be a starer in a dozen of teams in the league, etc, may be.

The lack of those players is translated to bad spacing on the floor, clumsy screening, difficulties making the entry to the post, too many risky plays that lead to turnovers, far from impressive communication on both sides of the floor, subpar transition defense, and problems guarding power 3s, face up or perimeter oriented 4 and taller bigs. However, it’s also needed to put all this in context. This is certainly a top-3 team in the league and arguably the best one, whatever the record says. But it could be better and I don’t like how we matchup against other contenders.

by cordobes on Jan 7, 2009 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what were the flaws when we were winning?

flaws are more obvious in the current trend— fatigue, inconsistency…

it’s hard to see flaws when the team wins— during the streak they were just seen as lapses, an off-quarter. these are the sort of trends that happen throughout any season as well. basketball is a streaky game, both in the game, and through the season…

by datruthyall on Jan 7, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

While the flaws always "jump out" more in losses,

I’d agree with cordobes that they were clearly there even during the winning streak – most notably the bad bench play and the turnovers.

As I wrote in my reflection about the trip out west, there’s no shame in saying that this team’s record was greater than the level at which it was playing – no one plays .931 ball over the course of a season. While we’ve lost a couple I wouldn’t have expected – and I’m as peeved as anyone about the performances as of late – I’m not sure it comes as the shock some around the league may consider it.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Jan 7, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Precisely.

Even the greats bottom out for stretches. The problem is, Doc has nowhere to go for help with Ray and Garnett struggling: No one to hit the outside shot, no effort guy to knock a Kobe around, no big to match up with the centers inside, no defender to cool off a hot shooter.

It staggers my mind to see people who think we can win 16 in the playoffs with this roster. There’s about a 5 percent chance of that happening, and only if the starters stay hot and effective.

Anyone remember Perk’s shoulder? Rondo’s ankle? Pierce’s knee? Any single one of those events with this roster in the playoffs could very well end this team’s season.

We won games while the starters were hot. Now, some of them have cooled off and there’s absolutely nothing sitting next to Doc to help make up the difference.

by CoachBo on Jan 7, 2009 8:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't take it out on each other

just a public service comment – please don’t take your frustrations out on other posters or react if someone is doing that to you – all I ask is that you treat everyone on here with respect

thanks

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Jeff, when we use the reply button we don't end up "repying" to the post we inteded to. We end up at the bottom of the queue

and it looks like a response to the last post in the queue. Unless I just don’t know how to use the reply and action buttons. In any case:

HOW ABOUT TURNOVERS? We lead the league in to’s and no one has mentioned this that I see. I think if we focus on the reasons for the to’s, that is what the real issues are.

1. We are just sloppy sometimes. So often is just seems like they aren’t paying enough attention. Most of the guys have good hands. Its hard to understand.
2. Floor spacing.
3. Forcing the action.(bad passes and charges)
4. Letting the clock go down to far.
5. Transition offense has left something to be desired.

Solved by: practice practice practice and additional horses: better back up point play, better outside shooters, more low post play.

Bottom line is we cut down on to’s we’d have won a couple more of the these games at least

by wahz on Jan 7, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

looks like you got it to work that time

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that because there wasn't more than one message

there are lower posts below that talk about to’s and had beat me to it

by wahz on Jan 7, 2009 11:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

added two more up top

mental focus and being tired in general after a short offseason

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Cordobes is wrong I think

The Celtics at 26-2 were not just eaking out the close games, and now the law of averages is what we are seeing. No way! They were a smooth running defense-focused first team that got energy from a better than expected 2nd team. They had shooters, drivers and low post scoring. They had attitude.
I assume the other teams have adjusted although aside from laying off Rondo I don’t see it with my fan’s eyes. To another poster’s comment , it did all change with the Lakers game. Probably an emotional level (starts w KG) that could not be sustained hit it ’s wall there. I think the defensive intensity is down and that starts with him.

However Cordobes is right in not over-worrying. Let a few losses piss them off and make them find the real Celtics game. Of long term worry though is Tony Allen. His game has gone south.

by Wildblu1 on Jan 7, 2009 10:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Off the top of my head, we won close games versus: Pacers, Bucks, Cavs, Rockets, Raptors, Hawks (x2), Knicks, Bobcats, Warriors…

by cordobes on Jan 7, 2009 10:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nba league pass...

Mike Gorman’s brilliance spoils us. Having to listen to Steve Martin & Henry Williams on the Cats broadcast was one of the worst experiences of my life. This is just one tiny example, but a five point lead is never “about five,” it’s just five. Maybe it’s slightly off-topic, but they threw me off my game.

by datruthyall on Jan 7, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'd sympathize that Martin and Williams were no world-beaters,

but on the bright side, after listening to Mike Rice in Portland, doesn’t everyone else seem a few notches better? Ugh, that was awful.

Agreed about Gorman, of course. He’s a pleasure.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Jan 7, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gorman - Yea Donny Marshall - Nay

I blame Donny for the losses. He’s such a downgrade from Tommy’s commentary. Last night, after KG finally went to the post and threw in a jump hook, Marshall says something to the effect of “going to your bread and butter” Does he watch this team?? Is their bread and butter KG shooting jump hooks in the lane?? I wish it were true but I think KG has taken that shot once every 5 games so far this season…hardly a bread and butter play!

Maybe if I watch with the sound off…

by help D on Jan 7, 2009 3:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

to me it boils down to one thing...

Defense

if this team plays top-notch defense, all the other issues are covered over

when we don’t, all the above things are exposed

like water over a rocky shoreline – you can navigate just fine at high tide, but watch out at low tide

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 10:56 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

It is THE major difference between last year, the streak, and now. All the talk about ball movement, bench offense, etc. misses the point. The Celtics have been scoring enough points in general, if they were holding teams to the 90 that they were previously. A big reason we beat the vaunted Lakers last year was the D. Right now, rotations are slow, and teams are scoring at will. Turnovers are overrated too. Every coach hates them, but the Celtics turned it over a ton last year too. Now it is magnified because we aren’t getting stops.

At all levels of basketball, from youth to pros, most critics’ analysis focuses on offensive flaws, when in reality, if you get stops, you can win with turnovers and less than ideal offense. The trademark D the team was built on last year has fallen off, everything else is peripheral. Go back and look at each loss, and see if we would have won with the amount of points we scored, no matter the turnovers, no matter the bench play, if we had held the opponent to 90 or less.

by KJ33 on Jan 7, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Arent the Bobcats the worst offensive team in the league as well? I also believe this is the first game we lost this season when scoring over 100. So, Yes it is the defense, but to me it still comes back to Turnovers…The bobcats are the worst fast break team in the league, which wasnt true last night? why? because of turnovers, its pretty clear teams are being told about how much we turn it over and being told to quickly convert in transition, and our transition defense has been pretty bad….
What about eddie house trying to stop the fast break by fouling and every single time the guy scores an and 1…ugh thats ugly basketball

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Its defense and turnovers….I cringe everytime we turn the ball over, because it almost instantly turns into a bucket for the other team…I know we had this problem last year as well, but I dont think we actually led the league in turnovers….

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 10:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Turnovers, Turnovers, Turnovers

I think it’s pretty simple, really. We’re turning the ball over more than any other team in the league. Essentially, we’re spotting every team we play a handful of possessions, and now we’ve come back to earth a little bit and it’s killing us.

The bench is an issue, but a secondary one. I don’t like seeing Powe + Baby on the floor at the same time, and I really don’t like seeing Scal + Powe/Baby. I know you can’t always have one of KG and Perk on the floor, but I’d like to see Perk in there with the one of Powe/Baby a little more often, even if it means seeing a little less of KG and Perk on the floor together. Obviously a bigger bench option would be nice.

And I hate to say it, but Marbury might help this team a good deal.

by JamesMartinCole on Jan 7, 2009 10:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

good rotation point

doc usually tries to keep Ray or PP on the court— but why not mix Perk w/ Baby or Powe & keep Rondo in to direct the 2nd unit? A coach like Popovich in SA subs more often and keeps a steady mix of starters in. I like when Doc rides a hot group, but sometimes doesn’t seem to remember what got that group going.

One instance from last night: we were playing well when Rondo was abusing Augustin & getting to the basket at will, then Cats put Felton back on him. But late in the game with Augustin back on Rondo, Rondo stopped attacking. Not sure if that’s on Rondo or coaching staff… but it’s lack of awareness. Also, Rondo’s pick/roll seems to have disappeared during the recent trend…

by datruthyall on Jan 7, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also, why does it seem like they arent even making a conserted effort to limit the turnovers? they just come out and start slinging the ball everywhere..
I think this is another reason to put this slump on losing to the lakers is nonsense, we’ve been leading the league in turnovers since before that game, they capitilized on it and other teams are also doing a better job at converting on on it

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 11:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It feels exactly like they start slinging it everywhere with no real focus

and I agree with Jeff that the d is lacking but isn’t it fatiguing to throw the ball away and have to play d again? If to’s were magically reduced to 12-14 from the 17+ level we do way better. Our d probelm mostly is transition, and rotation to the shooter isn’t as good

by wahz on Jan 7, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

re: flaws during winning streak

Turnovers were #1 flaw. Definitely coming back to bite us big time.

by datruthyall on Jan 7, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rondo

The Celtics were crushing teams mainly because Rondo was playing like an all star. Teams, starting with the Lakers have made the adjustment, while the Celtics have not. Rondo has mostly played below average lately and the Celtics have struggled as a result. I think this is the top reason. The rest are probably valid too, but the C’s have to adjust to the adjustments.

by reggie35 on Jan 7, 2009 11:38 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Complex Issue

I don’t think you can point to any single factor. It’s complex. First, they’ve been playing some decent teams on the road. They’ve had some terrible officiating (last night it was terrible both ways). They’re tired…Garnett is playing hurt..Perkins has been ineffective (IMHO his shoulder is hurt again)…Rondo has his shooting woes…they have a target on thir backs… turnovers…ineffective guard play from the bench… underutilization of Leon Powe…bad rotations by Rivers…

And so it goes. For the 50th time, he needs to sit House down and play Gabe Pruitt. He needs to sit Perkins down and give more minutes to Powe.

By the way, last night just showed that size isn’t the issue. The Celtics were much bigger up front than Charlotte, yet Okafor and Diaw controlled the paint defensively against bigger players. And Gerald Wallace outplayed the sluggish Pierce, who with one exception (the shot that sent the game into OT) was a step slow and a dollar short.

Will they recover? Who knows? They’re probably a 55 win team on paper, but for the past 7 games they’ve looked like a 30 win team. They’ve wilted under pressure three or four times in the fourth quarter (starting in LA)— and it’s the first unit that has done the wilting.

BTW, it’s nice to see the young Timberwolves stringing together some wins, even without Corey Brewer and with Telfair playing the point.

by Brickowski on Jan 7, 2009 11:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Just wondering why people are quick to call out Pierce, and not KG…Pierce has been the only one showing up recently, and outplayed Wallace in less minutes last night and everyone else has been just as bad or worse than him defensively….because KG is injured and came up limping in NY? so did Pierce….

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Curious
By the way, last night just showed that size isn’t the issue. The Celtics were much bigger up front than Charlotte, yet Okafor and Diaw controlled the paint defensively against bigger players. And Gerald Wallace outplayed the sluggish Pierce, who with one exception (the shot that sent the game into OT) was a step slow and a dollar short.

Pierce shot 58% to Wallace’s 41%, had more points, the same number of rebounds and one less assist in fewer minutes. Wallace did most of his damage on fast breaks were Pierce wasn’t even in the mix. Why in the world would you pick this one matchup to single out considering the fact that every other starter was outplayed stat wise by their counterpart?

Felton absolutely abused Allen and Rondo couldn’t keep anyone in front of him. This is were the breakdowns started for the most part and our rotations were very slow in making up for the lack of perimeter defense from our guards.

by Jaycelt on Jan 7, 2009 12:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeff . . .

You’ve done a great job of organizing the multitude of problems the Celtics have currently. Since the problems are both on and off the court issues, how would you approach correcting the train wreck of the last several games?

by amenhotep04 on Jan 7, 2009 11:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

that's another post

and perhaps a few weeks of posts depending on how long this drought lasts

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I figure it would take some time to address everything. I think we the fans tend to simplify many of the problems, instead of looking at the whole picture. To address remedying what is plaguing the Celtics currently would take some time and space.

by amenhotep04 on Jan 7, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what's wrong with the celtics..?

the lakers..

they really got into our heads. and it seems that our boys can not shake them out. it is the regular season-they should realize that the loss to the fakers is not the be all and end all of everything.

we seemed to be so obsessed with that.

they have the wrong mental take on that going into christmas showdown with the fakers. they went in and bought all the media pomp over one game.

and they thought that when they lost, a chink on their armour was exposed. That they somewhat realize they are not what they seemed to believe they are after the loss.

KG is too hard on them.

wake up guys. its the regular season! too much pressure on yourselves. so what if we do not have the homecourt advantage come playoffs.

take one game at a time. we are burned out early on the season. let go.

just enjoy each game..if kevin has that crazy mentality to make him effective the other guys should just play like themselves. If themselves meant loose then so be it.

enjoy the game.

forget about the lakers. If they are better or not we wil see in the playoffs. not in the regular season.

forget the lakers.

by CelticJoy on Jan 7, 2009 12:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

They’re on overload right now. They (we) need to chill the eff out.

by chunnamark on Jan 7, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Early Season Schedule was Hell...

and they still got off to the best start in league history. That took a lot out of them, though.

They had to work their butts off for two months, and they just got burned out. Doc needs to give each of the Top 3 a week off, one at a time, and get them rejuvenated.

by chunnamark on Jan 7, 2009 12:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The Laker

loss got under the C’s skin. Jackson showed the rest of the NBA how to beat the Cs. Our bench is missing two out of its three best players from last year. Baby has not stepped up. In fact he’s stepped back a bit. Garnett and Allen are a year older and have a lot of miles on their tires. Despite the Laker loss last night, there’s no way anyone can make the argument that the Lakers are not the best team in the NBA and they are certainly better and deeper than the Cs. Ainge and CO let Posey go and it’s killing us now.

by The Real Large James 2 on Jan 7, 2009 12:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Posey

played 22+ minutes for NOH last night scoring 7 point, 7 boards and played nasty defense. AGAINST THE LAKERS!

by The Real Large James 2 on Jan 7, 2009 12:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

He's also

shooting his best fg and 3p fg %’s of his career, he even had a 20/10 game this season….but again I think the Portland game got into their head more than that lakers game, or maybe the comination of both

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 12:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lakers?

I don’t understand this Lakers thing.

First of all, it’s not like the Lakers handled us; the Celtics lost a poorly officiated game by a handful of shots, some of which were flukes. The game could have gone either way. It was like Game 5 of the Finals last year.

Do people really think that the Celtics lost to the Knicks because the Lakers barely beat them a week ago?

by JamesMartinCole on Jan 7, 2009 12:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

lakers

we were to focused on the lakers at the start of the season.

and considering the kind of focus that we have it is hard to let go.

the laker offensive and defensive strategy this year was to beat the Cs. Although we deny that on paper—we were trying to measure ourselves against them. And who can blame the guys—the hype, the tradition, the rivalry and everything that goes with it- points to the fakers as our antithesis.

It is like Batman to his Joker..(the dark knight).

But the mental take should have been—we are the Champions and we try to play our best every night. taking notes and learning.

Not beating ourselves to death because we want to be better than the lakers and have the best record.

Like Batman too—we beat ourselves more than anybody.

Just let go and enjoy our play and learn from this journey.

by CelticJoy on Jan 7, 2009 12:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not going to beat a dead horse, or Posey for that matter. "That's just how I play..." Ugh.

Read this on the D. Dime today. It pretty much summed up what we dont have, an intangible if you will…Forget the length, point guard, bench etc. We need a bruiser. The guy(s) who get in the other teams head by making them think twice about scoring in the paint.
The first thing T. Heinson said after the C’s won was “Danny Ainge would be CRAZY not to sign Posey. Offer him whatever he wants…” Something to that effect. Here’s the excerpt from the Dime.

"Posey was guarding Bryant in the second quarter and fouled the Lakers’ star early on a drive, but as Bryant continued to the hoop after the whistle blew Posey took a whack at him. That drew a technical foul from Joey Crawford. It was worth it. Posey made his point, without giving a free one to the Lakers, as Bryant missed the free throw.

“They tell the defender to stop,” Posey said. "If I should stop, the offensive player should stop, as well. I wasn’t allowing continuation on that.

“That’s just how I play. I make my presence felt. Not just that, but throughout the course of the game. That’s just how I play.”

We need an enforcer.

by paul7x5x on Jan 7, 2009 12:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why would the team they beat in the finals

be in their heads to start the season? because of the critics? i mean, this team needs to look in the mirror and get more mentally tough than that, you’d think all they went though last postseason wouldve made them tougher than collapsing after losing a regular season game to the the team they beat in the finals.

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

enforcer/aggressor

isn’t Perk supposed to be this guy for us? beat people up coming into the paint?

on the flip side, I do see us losing aggression against shot blockers— Rondo in particular. Watch next time we play ATL— he’s always afraid his high school bud Josh Smith will swoop out of nowhere to block his shot. The same happened against Oden, except it affected the whole team— only jumpers down the stretch. Again last night vs. Okafor, though Rondo did attack a couple times. But he had 5 fouls over last 3 min of 4th & OT, and he wasn’t attacked once. That’s coaching.

by datruthyall on Jan 7, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Perk has been a different player since he hurt his shoulder in LA, and its certainly having an effect on ther interior defense

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I love reading the Posey comments

While I certainly wish he were still a Celtic, it’s that type of stuff that really made me enamored with him over the course of last season and left him a place in my heart nobody what uniform he wears.

Thanks for posting, Paul.

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Jan 7, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s not often when you can build a bench with one guy contributing so many varied pieces.

Ainge screwed up big-time with Posey.

Like Steve, I’ll always be a fan, regardless of where he plays.

Great post, Paul. I could not agree more.

by CoachBo on Jan 7, 2009 8:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no matter*

-sw

Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.

by Steve Weinman on Jan 8, 2009 12:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lakers

-When the Baby cried
-Garnett crawled on all four
-Rondo and Allen publicly arguing during a game
-trying to have a play without the coach’s consent

just some of the most recent ..

by CelticJoy on Jan 7, 2009 12:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

KG has been crawling for years

why do people always bring this up?

just because Henry Abbott just started noticing it because he did it against his Blazers doesn’t mean it is anything new

"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott

by Jeff Clark on Jan 7, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

True

But it’s certainly not helping us… the NBA has probably contacted KG about it, and he seems to be losing his intensity, other teams cant stand it and it gives them the motivation the next game around to knock KG around.. I mean coaches are rallying their troops to give him a taste of his own medicince, and its clearing wearing on him

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lakers

it has become a tailspin after that Christmas game—yeah, some nights there we try to comeback and beat the hell out of some teams—but, teams now are lining up to take their chance on the Cs.

Well, just one opinion. We can always deny this.

Just saying that if we own up to what happen and change the mindset it could turn us around.

Our guys do not even know what got into them.

Themselves.

by CelticJoy on Jan 7, 2009 1:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

27-2 to start, 2-4 after the fakers beat us

the only difference between our hot start and the current tailspin is that the fakers beat us on christmas day.

the fans can beat themselves about the why’s—but we have the same manpower, same coaching staff, —it is purely mental that has change.

No matter how long a list we make—we are still that same 27-2 team. How did we become a 2-5 after—? Well, it started at the start of the season when we put our sights on the fakers.

And when the fakers beat us on that one regular season game on Christmas, we began beating ourselves up!

Not true? well, just saying. 27-2 to start, 2-5 later.

What else made the difference. I know it is hard for guys to admit that. The Cs are the last one to admit that.

But it takes real men to do that. Until then, it is a tailspin. A monkey on our mental back.

by CelticJoy on Jan 7, 2009 1:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I've convinced myself I'm jinxing them

Every game I’ve watched since Xmas, the C’s have lost. When I don’t watch they win. So put it all on me. :-) I’ll stop watching for a few games and see what happens.

by LuckyNumber07 on Jan 7, 2009 2:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

A few facts that don't solve anything: we are tenth in turnover differential. And we are now 20th in foul differential.

So we are forcing enough turnovers to go from 30th in turnovers, dead last, to tenth in differential.

The celts are an elite team yet 19 other teams have an edge over their opponents when it comes to foul calls. I don’t think it was like that at the end of Nov.

The idea is we are blowing probably 3 points a game throwing the ball away and we have no edge at the foul line.

we throw the ball away at home even more than on the road.

by wahz on Jan 7, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'm Convinced

that yes, they might be tired from keeping the streak alive night in and night out, but people- don’t panic!!! What was our record last year at this point?

Do you really think a team loaded with veteran leaders and championship experience will let a whole season slip away? The good news is, no matter how much we analyze the recent struggles, Doc, Tibs, and the Vets are all working twice as hard to adjust.

Also, does anyone else think TA’s injury giving way to Gabe getting more minutes is a blessing in disguise?? I for one have been a TA Hater since day 1. His defense is overrated. He couldn’t hold poseys jock in the celts team D concept- we dont need a 1 on 1 defender, and even there I think it has gotten over-hyped. His offense consists of:
-cant dribble
-cant shoot (jumpers or 3s)
-misses TONS of layups
-low basketball IQ
-NEVER dishes when he uncontrollably drives and draws three defenders.

Is any of this inaccurate?

On the other hand, Gabe pruitt does ALL of the above:

-Shoots well (jumpers & 3s)
-Smart kid, understands the offense and TEAM D
-Moves the ball, finds the open man
-Great ballskills, can handle PG pressure

Seems like a simple choice for me. Everyone asks where do we find Gabe minutes? Seems like he could add some stability to this bench play that desperately needs some structure, ball movement, and outside shooting!

by burnin green on Jan 7, 2009 3:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Burnin green

Gabe looked lost at times last night and zero assists. Now the entire team looked off but Gabe didn’t do anything to make the coached more comfortable. I’m a Gabe fan as well or a fan of him trying to prove himself and last night was not the best start!

by richardlight on Jan 7, 2009 3:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree

with you there, but wouldn’t you say at this point, it would be better to give Gabe those minutes to get comfortable instead of watching TA wrecklessly throw the ball at the backboard and complain he got fouled? At least Gabe could hit the mid-range jumper that TA regularly air-balls!

by burnin green on Jan 7, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gabe was actually one of the only players with + in the +/- last night for the celtics…and I agree with burnin green at this point, I havent been very high on Gabe and dont think hes gonna solve all our problems, but I know Tony isnt, tony is a disaster waiting to happen and overall its a total dissapointment hes on this team instead of posey, and he needs to be traded for anything at this point and maybe even bring Giddens or Walker up…I dont care about his defense because I agree with burning green again, its very overrated.and not to be a jerk, but does tony actually have a learning disabiility or disability period?

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Plus

As fans, will we ever really, truly forgive him for that foul on Billups last year?

by burnin green on Jan 7, 2009 4:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

House the lone bright spot

Coming off the bench right now. Everyone else, send them as part of a deal. Bring us Joe Smith or Marcus Camby. I think the Clips are cheap enough, they’d take a package of Scal, Tony, and Powe for him.

by Tradetime on Jan 7, 2009 6:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Rest

Too many minutes for the 3 stars. Less minutes at their NBA age will give you more energy to play D. The bench plays Celtic D or make a change of players. More faith in bench players that do not play that much. Lets Go Celtics!

by CelticsWin on Jan 7, 2009 6:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They look some inspired in that Pic huh?

Also, didnt KG reach his 1,000 game mark earlier this season? Ray reached his 900th game tonight…woop dee freakin doo

by TheAncientRivalry on Jan 7, 2009 11:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

rest

I totally agree

by rondo9 on Jan 10, 2009 12:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Losing

I think when the Celtic’s lost to the Lakers It made the Celtics lose there confidence about the team. Once we get back on track we will be back on top

by rondo9 on Jan 10, 2009 12:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.
Start posting about the Celtics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tennessee_titans_small
Tonight's Game Photos
Images_small
Rondo Paul Aftermath
Small
Can the Celtics sign Lebron next year?
Grawful_small
The Most Hated Jumpshot
Small
We Slaughtered Them!
Cmsbaltlogopart2_small
Red Claws Draft Results-Danny Ainge Makes a Cameo
Small
Rasheed!
Small
(Speculation) Sam Smith says Lebron to Lakers
Lionel_at_misgav_am-_overlooking_mt
Whew-that was a close call
Small
Celtics Playoff Tix - Available Now?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Sponsors


Managers

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small indeedproceed

300h_small Wide Load

Small Donoghus

Capt_small redzdeadbabyredzdead

Authors

Picture_1_small Jim Weeks

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Small The Duke33

Parrotface_small dobbs

Po3_small Master Po

Small Jughead

Small CelticBalla32

Small petula

Small hankfinkel

Images_small Bent

Small tenaciousT

Big_4_small jimmyt

Celtics_shirt_small Greg Payne