Being the Circled Date
A Daily Babble Production
Being NBA champions means more than receiving some jewelery and a cool banner ceremony. It also means being referred to as the defending champion Boston Celtics (really, I love that part), receiving endless media attention and playing in front of capacity crowds at home and on the road. It also means facing the best shot of each of the league's other 29 teams on a more regular basis than ever before.
The Celtics play in Boston, a city known for both its rabid fans and scrutinizing media no matter the team's record, and they were accustomed to plenty of full houses last season. But while there was plenty of hype around the team a season ago, there were also a few Quentin Richardson types out there, maintaining that the C's hadn't won anything of consequence yet (during last season, this was true). Now, Richardson seems to be the only one left believing that the Celtics haven't "done anything." This team isn't just an intriguing mix of superb individual talents who haven't won rings anymore. These are the champions, which makes them by definition the reigning standard-bearers for top-tier basketball in this league. As a recent discussion with TrueHoop's Henry Abbott reminded me, that means something very different from "lots of media hype" on the calendars of the teams around this league.

It's become my understanding from watching enough interviews over the years (and using intuition), that with the possible exception of the aforementioned swingman from the Sizable Apple, it is going out and getting that ring that is the surest ways for players to earn respect from their peers in this league. Makes fairly obvious sense. But with that respect comes an understanding that this is the level the other teams need to be at, that these are the guys who everyone else needs to knock off.
And that's what makes the bull's-eye on this team's back larger than the one it had last season. There is no questioning the Celtics' credibility as the reigning champs, which means that beating them is as high a validation as other teams can gain on a nightly basis during the regular season. In a league in which the season is a marathon rather than a sprint and teams and players regularly appear to not be all that interested on certain nights, this makes all the difference in the world. There is a special high to taking down the champs, to beating the best.
Even more so than the other top-tier teams in the league that the Celts are likely to see come springtime, during the regular season it is the mediocre and bottom-feeding squads whose intensity really seems to rise against the champs. I write these next couple of sentences with the necessary awareness of someone likely coming off as an arrogant fan of a championship team, but that's sincerely not my intention: The truth is that for teams like the Warriors, the Bobcats and the Knicks, there isn't a greater end coming this season than winning a game against the Celtics. These are teams that most likely aren't making it to the playoffs, and if by some odd confluence of circumstances they do, they aren't likely to be there too long. There is a reasonable chance that this will be the highlight of those teams' 2008-09 campaign. Again, that's no potshot: For example, I fortunately do not have too many clear memories of the 36-win 1997-98 Celtics. But I can tell you all about siting home on Halloween night and watching the Celtics open the season by storming back from somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 points down to top the reigning champion Bulls in a nationally televised season opener, 92-85. It was a downhill from there that season, but I'll never forget our boys upsetting MJ and the two-time defending trophy winners.
Everywhere the Celtics go right now, they are heading into buildings full of fans who want this game to make their season, and they are visiting hosts ready to throw everything they have in the tank at them. There is something to be said for being pushed to play at the level of one's competition, and the Celtics have seen that from many of their supposedly lower-tier opponents. Stephen Jackson, Ray Felton, Adam Morrison and the entire non-Roy portion of the Blazers come to mind, to name just a few. The Knicks, a team not known for their defensive effort, came out with perhaps their most concerted performance of the year at that end against the Celtics.
Teams are geared up to play the champs, and that makes a particularly large difference considering when one considers a big part of what made this such a dominant regular season team last year: intensity.
A brief flashback: Back on the second day of November 2007, the Celtics opened a new era at home against the Washington Wizards. Watching this game on ESPN from more than 1,100 miles away, I became a fireball of energy wound up from years of bad basketball and a six-month off season. I literally spent the night jumping off my walls, pounding on doors and tables and screaming after every basket. My close friend Mays stopped by during the second quarter and made it through all of ten minutes before he couldn't take it anymore. He left with this parting warning: "Neither you nor your team can keep this kind of energy up through 82 games."
But much to Mays' surprise (and he has admitted as much since), the team and its fans did exactly that. There is no doubt that the Celtics were one of the league's supremely talented teams last season. But what made them that extra notch above everybody else in the regular season was that they simply seemed to be trying harder every night out. Every game was life and death, every loss an affront to KG and Paul and Ray and everyone else's very being. The 2007-08 Celts likely went from being a team that could have had a better-than-very-good record to a team that had a great one simply because they wanted it more, and their intensity was rarely matched.
It was my contention last year that part of the early trouble in the playoffs resulted from the fact that everyone picks up the intensity when the postseason starts. The Celtics might not have been prepared for that jolt initially, particularly from the Hawks. This season, it seems that the Celtics are getting nearly every opponent's A-effort each time out. That makes it tougher to win on a night-to-night basis, and even the wins come at more draining costs, which increase the team's fatigue for the games ahead onthe schedule. It also makes it more likely that the team will win a few less of the types of games it won last year, when it didn't play particularly well but carried itself to the 'W' simply by outworking opponents. Part of that intensity edge has diminished, not because the team's intensity has fallen off that much but because everyone else's is up when the Celts come to town. That the Celts' level may have declined a bit as well is reasonable, too. It's difficult enough to do what this team did through 82 games a season ago over the course of one year. Coming off of the ultimate glory and doing that again for another full year is almost impossible. A letdown is natural, and to some extent, the energy level this team has maintained on the year as a whole (not just the recent slump) has been impressive.
This is all, it should be noted, observation and not excuse. The Celtics are still as talented as just about any team in the league, and they still have the capacity to maintain the insane intensity level that they did a season ago. Further, and this can't be stressed enough, none of this is to say that the Celtics are slumping suddenly solely because other teams are trying harder. As of right now, this Celtics team isn't as good as the one from last year. That makes sense given that the team lost two major pieces from the title run (including one who was around and involved throughout the regular season), and the bench has been a disappointment. This is still one of the best teams in the league, and it's a team with the potential to be the one standing at the end once more. Being a couple of games off the pace of a group that won 66 games and had better personnel a season ago is nothing to be ashamed of. There are clear flaws on this team that need to be fixed (perhaps by the players and coaching staff, perhaps by the front office), and this team doesn't have its eight losses just because the other 29 teams are coming at the Celts harder than they were last year.
But being the circled date on everyone else's calendar doesn't make it any easier.
Comments
Have we earned any respect?
Nice article, Steve. I take issue with one thing though: unlike past champions, I don’t think this team has garnered THAT much respect from its peers. All you have to do is point to the recent comments from the teams that have beaten us: DJ Augustine saying we ‘fold,’ Aldridge saying we don’t like to be hit, Richardson saying we hadn’t earned the right to talk, etc…. These teams are not only getting up for us, circling us on the calendar, they also think we’re not as good as we’re perceived to be and they’re using that disrespect to fuel their wins. Of course, all this disrespect will only fuel us as the season goes along and we get into the playoffs, but for the life of me I can’t remember another defending champ who was disrespected to extent that this team has been this season.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on
Jan 9, 2009 2:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Time to shut up and play
At the start of the season and during the 19 win streak things got a bit out of hand.
The national media was discussing things like:
“Is this the best Celtic team ever?”
“Will the Celts break 72 wins this season?”
Now that they’ve hit a rough patch the pendulum has swung the other way. The rough spots will determine how they are perceived as champs. Do they work through or disintegrate and fold.
Win or lose in Cleveland there is still plenty of season left but it is time to shut up and play.
by olf on
Jan 9, 2009 2:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
and I thuoght you ran out of excuses....hahah!
I bet you my aunt’s pudding they will lose in cleveland!
They do not have that confidence anymore—they lost it…last year they had the psychological edge as opponents thought highly of them as the class acts—Ray Allen (fine gentleman), KG (a wounded but honorable warrior), and Pierce (the Truth)—
Now, that edge is nil—opponents do not fear them anymore nor respect them—Rayray is no clutch and no finer gentlemen than the next scrub, KG is a wounded alright but not a warrior— a thug in four—The Truth is a lying wheelchair diva—just look at her chin—
Teams want to beat them not because they are the champs but because they thing they are not acting like they are the defending champs..
they can still turn this thing around..
Common Steve, circling the date because they want to beat the champs—hahah, they want to beat the chumps…
Please, do not ignore how they have been behaving this season..
by Ricko of NY on
Jan 9, 2009 2:49 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yup, we’re done because you said so and we lost some games…in order for us to be defending champs…we cant lose a game
Have a nice day
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 9, 2009 3:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
am talking about their behavior, the Ancient one..not their win lose column.
i understand how hard it is to accept that..
Have a nice day to you too—and here’s for hoping that he Crab Dribbler do not spoil your evening too, your Ancientness!
by Ricko of NY on
Jan 9, 2009 3:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well, I cant understand why opposing fans and teams dont like the celtics trash talk and some of KGs antics, but honestly it hasnt changed since last season, if anything they’ve talked a little bit less trash and KG has been a little less intense.
They’re tagged as the somewhat evil empire right now, when last year when acting the same exact way were the feel good story of the NBA….makes no sense but carry on
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 9, 2009 3:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
celtics trash talk and some of KGs antics???
That is the problem with you people—for you its like some KG’s antics—hahahaha..
and you wonder why the world hates the Cs.
And, fyi—they are not an evil empire—empire means a lot of championships—(more than two!)—they are just the defending one-time champs—more like a rogue kingdom..
by Ricko of NY on
Jan 9, 2009 3:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay..I said somewhat of an evil empire, is how theyre being looked it…other than that you sound like a bitter disgruntled fan…when discussing the celtics behavior, i assumed you meant KG and the trash talk, no? its something more? please, grow up
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 9, 2009 3:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I meant I can understand why opposing teams dont like the celtics
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 9, 2009 3:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well, thats better..
opponents getting a bit more riled up than usual when facing the defending champs not because they are the champs but because of those same childish antics and thug trash talking from the defending champs…
last year, they were not the defending champs—now, they are—that is a hell, lot of difference.!
And, the game 7s they won oh so closely at home during the playoffs put a lot of doubters out there—
by Ricko of NY on
Jan 9, 2009 4:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
please don't curse
thanks
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on
Jan 9, 2009 4:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry to nitpick, but they won exactly *one* game 7 "oh so closely"
That, of course, would be the epic against LeBron and the Cavs.
The Hawks barely made it into the building for a 99-65 defeat.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Jan 9, 2009 4:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah but still--the Hawks in 7 games..?
and what if it was played on the Hawks homecourt?…there is a lot of what ifs out there—thats what am sayin..
by Ricko of NY on
Jan 9, 2009 4:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hawks
That series was somewhat of a fluke, and you cant play the what if game with homecourt, the hawks didnt earn it, celtics did
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 9, 2009 5:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think it may have a little to do with that and also just the celtics not playing well, and disrespecting the opponet by expecting to win
by TheAncientRivalry on
Jan 9, 2009 4:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rest
I think the Celtics just need some time off and they will be fine their schedule has been heavy with games and will be lighter at the end of the year. They will pick up a a vet or 2 before the year is over. Need to play the bench more and starters a few minutes less a game. Also until they can get a Vet or 2 on the bench mix the starters with the bench at times depending on the competition. It will be interesting to see if Walker and JR play at all.
by CelticsWin on
Jan 9, 2009 2:50 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Just a lot of back peddling
Great article once again Steve, but I have some issues with what you’re saying. 8 games ago, every Celtic fan felt we were better than a year ago. I know you have claimed you saw the holes all along with this team, but at 27-2, I’m not buying that you shared the same opinions you’re expressing now. Does losing 6 of 8 really change our perception of this team that much? To me, this is very similar to when we went 7 games with Atlanta. People were jumping off the Celtics bandwagon faster than the Titanic. No matter how good a team is, there is going to be a rut. All that matters is how they respond moving forward. If the Celtics go into Cleveland and win tonight, follow that up with 18 more victories in a row, will you share the same opinion you have now? The answer is no, as much as you may say you would, you would not.
Ok well that’s all debatable, but this is WHY you are wrong. You said that we are worse because we lost Posey and Brown. Makes sense, especially with the failure to fill that void by Tony Allen. Just like we added Borwn, we may still add someone to replace him. However I do believe moving Pruitt ahead of Allen in the rotation is going to make a big difference. But your ignoring the fact that you’ve reported about all year. How much better Rondo, Perkins and Allen have been. We’ve seen major improvements in these 3 players this season from last. So you’re tellling me their progression didn’t make up for the loss of PJ Brown and James Posey? That’s absurd.
What has happened in the last 8 games that has been very evident and the main reason for our demise has been the ginormous slump that our starting backcourt has been in. Through the first 29 games of the season, that same backcourt was arguably the best in the NBA. In the last 8 games, both Allen and Rondo have been simply average. So we can take all this junk about how there were “holes all along” with this team and “teams have figured us out” and throw it out the window. Sometimes great players don’t play great for stretches, especially over an 82 game season. Both Rondo and Allen will get back to normal, and once they do we will rise back to the best team in the game. Because that is what we are, the best team in the NBA.
SCOTT
by Vegas Scott on
Jan 9, 2009 3:36 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not really sure what you want me to say here, Scott
in that while I wasn’t looking to say “I told you so” when I wrote the article about the road trip, and that sincerely isn’t my intention now, your comment that you’re “not buying that [I] shared the same opinions that [I’m] expressing now” moves me to remind you that yes, I did in fact do exactly that. At 25-2, I mused about the troubles with the bench and even advocated that Doc continue to run his second unit out there at the risk of losing a few games, simply to find out what this team had. At 26-2, I joined the Kamenetzky Brothers of ESPN Radio LA to chat in advance of the Christmas game and discussed the same problems I’ve talked about during the losing streak, in particular turnovers and the bench. I made my thoughts clear on the Posey issue during the summer, and while I’ve hoped against hope to be wrong about that, so far, I think it’s been evident that the bench has disappointed. Again, I reiterate that this isn’t to say “I told you so” but simply to defend myself from your accusation given that the proof of my earlier comments is in writing and recordings.
As far as the issue about the improvements of the starters and the drop-off from the bench, I certainly don’t mean to downplay the increased contributions of Rondo, Ray and Perk. But it bears noting that it’s extremely tough to win a championship with just five players. These guys aren’t going to play 48 minutes a game, and right now the decline when the starters leave the game is significant, and that’s my concern about this team.
i never said other teams had “figured the Celtics out.” But there were flaws with this team, and they have been evident on the good nights and the bad ones so far. I’ve also never claimed that the Celts aren’t or won’t be the best team in the NBA. But there are issues that could be solved to bring forth improvements in this team, and those issues aren’t new. That’s all I’m saying.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Jan 9, 2009 4:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hear you Steve
Don’t take what I was saying the wrong way, I know that you voiced concerns. But voicing concerns aren’t the same to me as what I’m hearing now. To me the only real difference between last year at this point of the season is that we actually do need some help in the backcourt. Last year Posey’s versatility allowed that hole to be covered. This year, either Pruitt needs to become a member of this rotation or we need to bring someone in that can handle the ball and just be trusted. Tony Allen was supposed to be that guy. It’s become clear that he’s not that guy. There is no way we can win a title with TA and Eddie House as our backup backcourt. Something has to give. Yes we could use another big to help give us size, since it seems clear that POB will not be seeing any relevant minutes. However, while I believe that a change is necessary in the backcourt to win a title, I don’t feel like it is in the frontcourt. Just like I didn’t think acquiring PJ Brown was necessary last year (I can say pretty confidently that we would have won that title with out without PJ Brown, regardless of what anybody says). Simply adding Marbury or getting production and minutes out of Pruitt is all we need. I still feel like come June we will be the team to beat. That’s all im saying.
SCOTT
by Vegas Scott on
Jan 9, 2009 5:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A Couple Thoughts
1. You are dead wrong and the Salmon and Potatoes dude is completely right about the respect thing. This team gets no respect around the league. Rick Bucher was saying on the BS Report that he has never seen a championship team that night in and night out rookies and terrible teams are trashing on in the media with “they aren’t that good” type talk. We saw it from Augustin in Charlotte. Other teams really do not believe that this Celtics team is very good for whatever reason. Stein says he thinks it is because they are so hated. Simmons points to all of the regular season celebrating and cockiness as the reason that everyone hates them.
2. In your conclusion you say that this team is capable of giving the same intensity every night that the team did last year. I disagree with that. If you look at all of the recent dynasties — Bulls, Lakers, Spurs — those teams all knew how to turn it off and turn it back on. Certainly the Bulls had a few seasons when they went crazy the whole year, but the Spurs especially don’t try to win any prizes in the regular season. They know that the regular season isn’t that important and that preserving your players is.
Stein and Bucher both think that this team is just really burnt out right now. Their legs are still feeling the effects of last season’s 82-games all-out sprint, which isn’t the proper way to go through a season, especially when your core is older players. Right now they just don’t have the energy to make runs at the end of games to close them out.
by mvnclipper on
Jan 9, 2009 3:49 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think it is both
I agree with Bucher on the fact that teams are not SHOWING respect to the Celtics because they think the Celtics have not behaved in a way that deserves it. However, I think teams can’t help but respect the defending champs because they are… the defending champs. So while they respect the C’s enough to get geared up for them, they don’t respect them enough to back down. A dangerous mix for Boston.
"Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy. Both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." Michael Scott
by Jeff Clark on
Jan 9, 2009 3:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Please don't call the Spurs a dynasty
Real dynasties can win back to back.
by wondahbap on
Jan 9, 2009 4:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ray is spending too much time with the ball
We keep hearing that they had trouble “fitting him into the offense” last year and how much better he is fitting in this year. But what I’m seeing lately is a whole lot of “get the ball to Ray and let him dribble around or pop a 3.” It’s a drag.
I am NOT saying that Ray is responsible for the slump … I’m just making an observation that is contradictory to what I am hearing on TV and reading on the Web.
by Cousin It on
Jan 9, 2009 3:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
That's an interesting thought
and something I need to pay a little more attention to before I’ve got a real thought one way or the other on the matter. Thanks for bringing it up, CI.
-sw
Manuel Aristides Ramirez is the greatest hitter I've ever seen.
by Steve Weinman on
Jan 9, 2009 4:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've thought this whole year
that the Celtics seem to be classless champs, BUT on the other hand I feel that they wear the crown. Until they are beaten in their final game, you just have shut up and put up.
Their over the top trash talk does get teams extra riled up, but the better team will always win out in the long run. That’s why it’s so hard to win back to back.
Cousin It,
Ray Allen is at his best when he’s a threat to go the basket. He settles for the 3 too often.
by wondahbap on
Jan 9, 2009 4:34 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
My point is
if the trash talk gets other team into it and play harder (shouldn’t they anyway?) and in turn the Celtics are getting beat, then as Champs, they just have to turn it up a notch. Fatigue be damned.
by wondahbap on
Jan 9, 2009 4:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As far as the “bigger target” argument of your article goes, I’m in agreement with you, Steve. One look at the fanfare and confetti that is released after some of these away losses and you gotta think that teams and their fans are taking the Cs more than seriously.
The phenomenon of teams disrespecting the Celts seems to me to be all about mindgames. I don’t see it as anything new to the NBA, and I think the only real difference between this year and last is that this team is giving critics a bit more fuel with its performance of late.
Anyway, all said, I’m still pickin the Cs tonight.
Real Ubuntu, real hunger… Go C’s!
by Hal Jordan on
Jan 9, 2009 4:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
sure the celtics trash talk but so does the rest of the nba. these players have been on the playgrounds trashing each other for years. it is self ingratiating, showboating, narcissistic , and exhibitionistic and flat out obnoxious but it’s been part of the game for too long. david stern could do something about it but he’s too busy counting money . and by the way, i am not blaming the refs for the recent losses, but the reffing is outrageously worse than ever this year.
by nazzbo on
Jan 9, 2009 6:32 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs

















