Goodbye, J.R.?
Outside of Kevin Garnett, it's possible that no player has more riding on this pre-season than J.R. Giddens. Why? Because October 31 marks the date by which the Celtics must determine whether they want to pick up Giddens $1,100,640 contract for next season. If the team declines the option, Giddens would become an unrestricted free agent next year. While the team has not commented on Giddens' future publicly, it's likely that J.R. will not be having a happy Halloween.
When Giddens was drafted, there was speculation that he would immediately find a role on the team, due to his size, athleticism, and allegedly NBA-ready defense. However, that never materialized. Giddens declined to participate in the Celtics' summer camp, a decision that, according to Danny Ainge, set him back. Next, Giddens couldn't earn a spot on the active roster coming out of the pre-season, followed by his name appearing in trade rumors. Giddens was quickly sent to Utah to play in the D-League, where he performed well -- 17.2 points, 6.3 rebounds, and 3.0 assists with a 57.8 FG% -- leading his team to the D-League Finals. However, despite injuries to Tony Allen and the fatigue of Paul Pierce and Ray Allen, he never made much of a contribution in Boston; in six games played, he totaled 4 points in 8 minutes played.
This season appears to be more of the same. Despite early injuries to Tony Allen and Bill Walker, Giddens hasn't been seeing a lot of minutes with either the first or second team in training camp. Indeed, while speculating on who could guard shooting guards when five bench players are in the game at the same time, Doc's mind wandered to Brian Scalabrine, rather than to Giddens. When asked to assess Giddens' future, Doc responded this way:
But it’s going to be tough right now for [Walker or Giddens] to get on the floor. We’re pretty deep. We have good depth, great veterans. So it will be tough or them to get on the floor. I’m hoping they do. J.R. has a chance to be a terrific defender. He has to improve his offensive skills. He has to improve how to play with his offensive skills with other players. So that’s something he’s improving on. I think he’s much better than he was last year.
In other words, don't expect him to play. The writing appears to be on the wall. Giddens isn't a 19 year old still learning the game; he'll be 25 years old this season, older than Rajon Rondo and Glen Davis, and only three months younger than Kendrick Perkins. The most exciting news concerning Giddens this summer has come from his twitter page, where he talks about still doing "rookie runs" to CVS and states that he feels like he's behind "invisible prison bars" due to the number of meetings he's been attending. There's no reason to pay Giddens $1.1 million next season, when the team can sign a more experienced veteran to an $850k minimum contract. Furthermore, by declining Gidden's option, he becomes an expiring contract, which makes him nice salary filler in any deal.
Based upon the above, I simply can't see Giddens in Boston beyond this season. There's no spot in the rotation for him, and he's simply more valuable as an expiring contract than he is as a player. I wish him all the best in the future, but I can't help but feel that this season is the J.R. Giddens farewell tour.
Update: For more on Giddens, see today's article in the Globe.
0 recs |
51 comments
|
Comments
Goodbye Mr Giddens
This month is vital for him. If he managed to do something huge, then maybe, just maybe he wouldn´t be let go. But I really doubt it. He´s a goner
by greenwise on Oct 7, 2009 3:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Billy Walker is the only young guy who could crack the rotation.
His injury ruined my week…
by Global Celtic on Oct 7, 2009 5:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn...
I honestly thought JR Giddens would stay here in Boston. He seems like a player with HUGE potential… his athleticism, his size, his defensive skills… Hmm, whatever, he’ll be a nice trade piece for another team.
by AlexC on Oct 7, 2009 6:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
if he had huge potential..
.. we would have seen it before the age of 25.
by TomHamilton30 on Oct 7, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luckily...
… we don’t have to decide on Walker’s option until July 8, 2010.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 6:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Now that Walker has had another knee injury i think they’ll keep him on the books.
by jesse_stoneham on Oct 7, 2009 7:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good article Roy
I’ve only seen him play in those six games last year and this summer’s Summer League and I honestly can’t say that at this time the kid looks NBA ready. At this point, he might have more value to the team as an expiring contract, where his million dollars will help to fit in in a trade to get the numbers need to trade for a player, than he would as a player on the court. For that reason, I don’t think they pick up the option as they might feel better starting over with next year’s first round pick.
by nickagneta on Oct 7, 2009 8:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good angle, but you are getting a little slow
You only beat the Globe by a day on this story!
by Michael Anthony on Oct 7, 2009 8:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is wrong on so many levels
Horrible idea. Giddens was a first round draft choice that has been in the league one year. Doc did say Giddens was going to be terrific defender. Keep in mind this same guy is at the first week of training camp. To you’re point of Scal playing SG I really believe Doc was experimenting with different sets more so than Giddens not being good enough.
Scal or TA is not going to be here in 90 days, so who plays back up SG if Daniels is in for PP. Daniels can’t play two positions at the same time.
So you say we’ll pick up a vet. That’s possible but you have no ideal who will be available. The chemistry is a question his salary or the length of his contract will be question.
We can’t keep expecting players to come here for cheap. Everyone has a family to feed and as Danny say’s this is business.
Every team that can run gives us the blues. Why is that? Because they are good….. not necessarily, because they are young. Every team has to have youth to continue being successful. Giddens will be given this year but if their is not improvement this year he will be let go.
THE GLOBE IS WRONG ALSO
by tyquinton on Oct 7, 2009 8:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you might be the obne that is wrong
First off, the Celtics have until October 31, 2009 to determine if they want to pick up Giddens’ 2010-11 contract. They don’t have until the end of the 2009-10 season to determine if he is going to be here next year, they have until the end of the month. So Giddens will actually be given this year AND next year to prove he is worth keeping or he will become a lame duck player for this season. It is either one or the other.
Second, if they don’t pick up next year’s option before the season starts then he becomes just another expiring contract in a year where, because of the glut of free agents and the economy, teams will be begging for expiring players come the deadline. You ask who will be available? That’s easy. Take a look at the teams in financial trouble. New Orleans, Phoenix, Sacramento, Charlotte, Memphis. The take a look at the teams that might want to add max contracts next year, New York, New Jersey, Detroit, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Miami. There are going to be a ton of very talented players available to be picked up for the teams wanting to pick up players.
Third, I don’t see that the Celtics have that much problem with young teams who have a running style. Golden State gave them no problems. Oklahoma City the same thing. And other than a tough 7 game series against Atlanta, the C’s have handled the Hawks quite easily in the regular season. The Celtics have plenty of youth. And good youth. Perk, Baby, Rondo, and Williams are all NBA caliber players that are 25 or less. Tony is just 27. Daniels, 28. This team has the dichotomy of youth and age like you claim they don’t. They just play a non running style and given 126 regular season wins, two playoff appearances and a championship over the last two years, I think that style suits them well.
by nickagneta on Oct 7, 2009 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said, nick.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
indeed..
save me a detailed post, AND you said it better. The only thing I’d add is that I don’t see ownership committing $1.1 mil (which is a lot considering what they paid for sheldon & marquis, and they are over the salary cap) for a guy who probably won’t play any minutes, even if there is an injury to the starting roster.
by TomHamilton30 on Oct 7, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel for the guy...
I feel for him – if he had gone to more shallow team perhaps he could have been developed further and really been able to show his athleticism. Tough break J.R. All the best.
by jimmehx on Oct 7, 2009 8:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
JR did not have a bad break
The Celtics were the team that wanted him. How is it a bad break when the team that actually likes your game drafts you?
Sometimes players just aren’t good enough.
by guava_wrench on Oct 7, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This one could come back to bite us
First round pick…good size for a guard…no health issues…no character issues…athletic…played well in college…played well in D-League…wore #4 like Chauncey Billups.
Doc gave JR 8 minutes last year…and he shot 67% from the FIELD!
Doc gave Stephon M. 414 minutes…and he shot 46% from the FOUL LINE!
Smart, Doc….for NOT giving JR even the slightest opportunity!
by Title 18 on Oct 7, 2009 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No character issues??
That you know of but his history in college is quite different. Go back and check out his college past. That is, from what I hear from a well placed Big 12 AAD that was the tip of the iceberg.
Now, maybe he has matured and maybe we haven’t heard of anything because he has cleaned his act up. But he is not that far removed from some very questionable decisions and actions that could call into question his character.
by nickagneta on Oct 7, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is first round pick a plus?
It makes no sense whatsoever to list his being a first round pick as a plus. We drafted him with the LAST PICK of the first round. If we hadn’t overvalued him, he drops to the second round!
I blame Doc and Danny for drafting him, not for his lack of playing time.
by guava_wrench on Oct 7, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry Title 18
There has always been character issues with JR Giddens – that’s why KU shipped him off after nightclub stabbing incident. He supposedly got his act together out west @ UNM but even then there were some issues. Then he refuses to play summer league. Trust me the guy has an issue with his attitiude. While he has matured I am not buying the statement “no character issues”
While I agree that JR does have athletic ability and has POtential sometimes you just don’t get your fair shake.
Peace
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Oct 7, 2009 9:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He refused to play summer league? Check your facts please.
I have little doubt that he will be picked up for next year. Next year we have 7 wing free-agents… 8 if you count Pierce. It would be wise to keep one of the young guys for cheap at the moment. Of course, I think most of it will depend on how he looks now in preseason, so I think he’ll get some good opportunities to play at the moment to see where he’s at, but it just makes sense to keep him around, if only for just one more year.
by BudweiserCeltic on Oct 7, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What fact did Po misrepresent?
Sure, it was the Celtics’ version of summer league — basically, free agent camp — but Giddens still sat it out. Lots of first rounders play in summer league without having contracts. Giddens could have done that, too, but on the advice of his agent, he didn’t.
According to Danny, that set him back.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not the same thing. It just isn’t. Refusing to play a game, and just not coming to a what I think was an optional camp during contract negotiations is completely different.
by BudweiserCeltic on Oct 7, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was an opportunity for Giddens to get some time in
… and to learn the Celtics system. He didn’t take advantage of that, and according to Danny, it hurt him.
If nothing else, it was a miscalculation by Giddens.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s a completely different argument though. I’m not talking about wether it hurt him or not, just saying that missing a camp during contract negotiations, it’s completely different than refusing to play during Summer League. What we’re discussing here are character flaws, and missing some camp during contract negotiations is completely natural. Summer League have games in them, I have little doubt he would’ve showed up to play because one likes to play…
Miscalculations? Sure, but we don’t know the nature of those contract negotiations though. And surely, he was probably working under the advise/influence of his agent, but I really don’t think we can hold that against him… he was here for training camp.
You go to the NFL, and see how absurd some of those rookie holdouts are, how can you really hold something like this against Giddens? It’s the nature of the beast, when he counted, he was here… not as prepared as he could’ve been otherwise, but he was here.
by BudweiserCeltic on Oct 7, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody has potential. That means nothing.
In fact, Giddens’ age seems to point to him having less potential than other players from his draft.
by guava_wrench on Oct 7, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the info about JR, PO
I did not know that…weird, wild stuff!
by Title 18 on Oct 7, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The fact being J.R. can play. This kid was an all-american who went to KU. He then transfered to NM St. The fact being that he plays on a championship calaber team that is very deep. You think Paul Pierce, Ray Ray, and KG have a lot of years left? Yes they should pick up his option because this kid can play. He just needs an opportunity. I’m so sick of hearing the word “potential.” I hate that word and the NBA has too many players based upon “potential.” Potential is for a 19 year old kid where you don’t know how mature he is going to be on the court. Is his wisdom going to carry with his raw talent? This kid stayed in college for 4 years so it isn’t potential as much as getting the opportunity on a star studed team. You need younger players to hang around and learn from three future hall of famers. The person who needs to go is Tony Allen. He is aweful! Aweful. I can’t stand him. He can’t play in the NBA. He’s supposedly here for defense. What defense? JR is a lot better than Tony. I’ve seen both of them since they came out of high school and JR has a good jump shot, great slashing skills and above average rebounding skills for his height. He plays GREAT defense. Doc needs to give this kid a shot. He can def. play he just needs the opportunity to play. Granted its the D-League but I mean c’mon 17 – 6- and 3 a game. Daniels has proven himself in this league but I will guarentee that if Giddens played for the Pacers he would of done a lot more than Daniels did. Don’t get rid of this kid, we need younger players around and he’s the best of them.
by MBoucher1216 on Oct 7, 2009 10:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The real deal?
Most questions in life can be answered by another question:
“Where is the money?”
I think this is the case here. From what our experts here have told us:
1. We are over the cap. 2. Any moneys we spend now costs double.
If a vet can be picked up for 850 ?? And JR costs 1 Mill, that’s 300 K difference out of our owner’s pockets? 300K may not sound like much to all our big spenders on this forum but I’m sure it does to Wyc etc.
by Dipper on Oct 7, 2009 10:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There are more than a few hints that JR may have the equivalent of Tony Allen's brain...
…and the C’s seem more and more appreciative of a good ‘basketball IQ’ all the time.
by clover on Oct 7, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nicknagneta you mis read what I said. Looks like we can be good verbal sparring partners
The Globe never said the team is going to let Giddens go. As a matter of Danny said he’s hard to guard one on one. The Globe article said Giddens can play NBA defense.
The guy has been to one training camp has played no exhibition games is your first round draft choice you spent over 1mil. on him and you want to throw him under the bus. The Globe article said the starters will play the first quarter then the rest of the team will play. His play will stop all this nonsense.
by tyquinton on Oct 7, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Read the context, saying that he’s hard to play one-on-one was clearly a backhanded compliment when the next words out of Danny’s mouth were “he struggles in five-on-five.” Unfortunately, outside of Memphis the NBA game is 5-on-5.
by theBird on Oct 7, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good riddance….anyone who has attached themselves to a guy whos played a total of 8 minutes is sillly…this guy is nothing but a waste of a roster spot
by latin on Oct 7, 2009 10:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Giddens has some legit NBA-talent
Giddens is a NBA-level defender, penetrator, and rebounder. The problem is, that talent doesn’t fit on this team, mostly on the offensive end. Giddens needs the ball in his hands to be an effective player—he really has a poor off-the-ball game on the offensive end. In our system, in the role available to him, he needs to be able to play off the ball, hitting stand-still spot-up jumpers, moving the ball without 5 dribbles between his legs, and generally being efficient. But Giddens is all iso.
It’s my opinion that PG is about the only position where JR has any chance of cracking our rotation, but I’ve seen zero indication that they’re thinking about that. It’s a long shot anyway—but it’s his best shot on this team. In reality, JR needs to go to a bad team with available minutes for him to play his type of game.
Giddens, barring an injury in the next 3 weeks to the 6 players ahead of him on the depth chart, is not going to get his contract extended.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Oct 7, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hello Hudson?
It seams like the only young guy any of the players or coaches have talked about (during training camp) is Hudson.
by stevenfuzz on Oct 7, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tony Allen
I don’t know that JR has more upside than Tony. And if Tony was 100% I would think Doc would insert him over Scal at SF. Doc and DA have been watching JR play in practice. if JR is not impressing Doc enough, that Doc tries to make it work with Scal at SF, that is not a good sign as to Doc’s gut level assessment. Thus far Doc doesn’t seem to be even considering it. If we don’t see some showing of JR in the preseason, I would think that is a Thumbs Down statement.
by Bozo on Oct 7, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is where I think Doc falls short, comments like this, “We’re pretty deep. We have good depth, great veterans.” Doc does a lot of things that are greatly suited for a veteran team, but his ability to recognize and develop young talent falls short. The celtics will be much better suited in the long run, finding out in game situations if these young guys can play. Doc had guys like Ryan Gomes and Delonte West buried on the bench until injuries forced him them and they each responded immediately. I’m not saying that either Walker or Giddens will be stars or should get consistent playing time – just, let’s find out. Even if it sacrifices a win or two in the regular season, it will pay off in the long run.
by bigperm33 on Oct 7, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I haven't seen enough of him to personally gauge his po/talent
… but Doc and Danny have. I think he’s got this preseason as his last best shot to make Danny believe he needs to keep him.
I hope he at least gets a lot of preseason minutes so we can get a look, because even after a year, I have little clue as to what this kid can do. Still, it matters not at all whether any of us think he’s worth keeping, and he’s only got 3 weeks to show something special to Danny and Doc.
If they don’t pick up his option, he’s the kind of expiring that other teams like, in that he is (relatively) young and still has some po versus strictly expiring salaries with no po. At least they’d get a free look at somebody they might like to keep around.
This is a hugely important preseason for J.R.
by Mencius on Oct 7, 2009 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's Mr PO to you ;-0
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Oct 7, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to argue against your point
Amusing to see people allege he has NBA game. Giddens non playing time last year when we were in need of players indicates that there isn’t NBA level talent there. Danny isn’t going to say that in public but actions speak louder than words. Always have.
I’m rooting for him. Always hoping that another Reggie Lewis, Gil Arenas, etc comes off that bench one day. But rooting and betting are two different things.
by Wildblu1 on Oct 7, 2009 2:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If TA, House, and Daniels are all gone next year, Giddens might be given another shot. Just something to think about
by markgent on Oct 7, 2009 2:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I never understand why people overvalue these late-1st, 2nd round picks of ours.
Giddens, Hudson, etc. There’s a reason they fell so far. This isn’t the NFL draft. A late 1st round pick doesn’t have a very good shot at being a good NBA player. A late 2nd-rounder is practically a non-entity in 9/10 cases. Giddens never showed anything in particular. Pruitt never showed anything in particular. Until Hudson shows something, I’m going to assume he’s just not NBA-level talent. The only guy we’ve drafted the last few years who has shown flashes of brilliance is Bill Walker.
Stop acting like Danny is capable of weeding out top-10 talent with the 30th or 50th pick. It just hasn’t happened.
by USG on Oct 7, 2009 3:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I basically agree...
Danny has done way, way better than average with his second rounders — Gomes, Powe, and BBD are all legit players — but that doesn’t mean he’s going to hit on 100% of his picks. I think Giddens was a poor pick, based upon other players left on the board (i.e., Chalmers).
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did misspeak saying it hasn't happened.
The point being that Powe, Gomes, and Davis have all shown their talent. And much like in baseball, succeeding 3/10 times isn’t too bad.
Well, it is, but I’m not gonna start talking about OBP on a basketball blog.
by USG on Oct 7, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Danny’s adeptness at identifying gems in the second round has been a little exaggerated over the years. Some of the players that used to be mentioned as being evidence of his abilities to find hidden talent – Brandon Hunter, Justin Reed, Orien Greene – have blown out of the league within a year of leaving the Celtics. BBD has become a very good player, but he was almost a no-brainer at that point in the draft.
He’s still good at idenifying talent, but he’s not infallible.
by theBird on Oct 7, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's definitely not infallible...
But relative to draft position, he hits more than he misses. Guys like BBD or Ryan Gomes may seem like no brainers, but how come nobody else is taking them and Danny is?
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When I am screaming at the TV, “TAKE BIG BABY DAVIS!”, that means it’s a no-brainer… ;)
by theBird on Oct 7, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Well, I’ll admit that I was one of the people who was pretty down on BBD coming out of college. I didn’t think he had the athletic ability — mostly in terms of jumping — to be a major contributor at this level.
I liked Josh McRoberts better. It shows what I know.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Oct 7, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Giddens was destended to fail
HE should not have been drafted in the first round anyway. Take a look at the players that were drafted behind him. CDR for the Nets for example, and our own Bill Walker.
This was a wasted pick from the monent that it was made.
I shead no tears for him and let his performance tell the story.
by erb1259 on Oct 8, 2009 3:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























