Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

A Rested Team is an Offensively Efficient Team

NBA players probably don't understand the luxury of the typical three day weekend. They work nights and weekends on most occasions, so three days with no games to them must be like Friday or Monday off for the majority of us.

Above all, we take advantage of the time off and based on the smackdown the the Celtics laid down on the Jazz last night, it seems pretty clear they made the most of their time off. One day of rest plus two days of practice was just what the doctor ordered for what appeared to be a very fatigued group of Celtics following Saturday night's "outlasting" of the Nets.

The Celtics followed up a sloppy and poorly executed game against New Jersey with a crisp, efficient (on both sides of the ball) and relentless display of teamwork, unselfishness and execution in a 105-86 thrashing of a very capable Utah team. The offense started in the paint, extended beyond the three-point line, eventually spread to the open court and Utah was subdued before it really had a chance to fight back.

The numbers from last night speak volumes:

41-77 shooting (53.2%), 7-19 3-point shooting (36.8% - a few were chucked up unnecessarily in garbage time), 16-18 free throws (88.9%), 105 points and 30 assists.

Star-divide

As impressive as the team's overall numbers were, the individual box scores help to paint a clearer picture (see below). Seven players scored in double figures, highlighted by Kevin Garnett's 18. Kendrick Perkins scored 10 and snagged eight rebounds. Rajon Rondo dropped 14 points and dished out 11 assists (with the exception of a few more rebounds, isn't this ideal production from Rondo right now?) Paul Pierce showed great balance with 13 points, six rebounds, six assists and three steals. Perk was the only starter to shoot less than 50 percent from the field for the game. As a five-man unit the starters shot 28-45 (62 percent). Every starter was at least +13 on the +/- scale, capped off by Ray Allen's +21.

"Rondo did a good job of finding everybody, consolidating the ball and being aggressive," Garnett said afterward. "It was just a good group effort tonight. You could tell the three days paid off in a big way."

That group effort was perhaps best on display with 8:24 left in the third quarter when Rondo fed Allen down low, who immediately kicked it back out to Perk, who tossed the ball behind his back to Garnett, who then found Rondo cutting to the basket for a lay up. The man who started the play ended up finishing it. It was a magnificent play and sums up the night this team had.

When you compare the numbers from last night to Saturday's game in New Jersey, the differences are somewhat frightening.

Vs. Utah: 41-77 shooting (53.2%), 7-19 3-point shooting (36.8%), 16-18 free throws (88.9%), 105 points and 30 assists. 7 players scored in double figures. 

Vs. New Jersey: 31-69 shooting (44.9%), 1-10 3-point shooting (10.0%), 23-29 free throws (79.3%), 86 points, 21 assists. Three players scored in double figures.

"During the stretch of eight games (in 12 nights), we rarely had any practice time so throughout that course you play, you play and you don't practice, (so) you lose some of the discipline that you had throughout the course of practicing before you play," said Pierce. "It's good to get out there, to get a couple days just to sharpen up, see what we needed to do, see what our mistakes (were), because there was a little slippage in those last three games, but fortunately we won two out of the three games and hopefully we can continue to play sharp basketball over this next stretch."

I assumed that the C's would use the practice time to fix things like their pick and roll defense, but clearly the team's offensive execution was highlighted as well. Based on the numbers from last night, I think it's fair to say the reps in practice carried over to the court.

"We're not perfect, (but) we might make it look perfect at times," said Garnett. "I think those were some of the focuses these last couple days of practice - ball movement, getting back to being a fundamental team. Tonight you saw that. I thought the ball moved well throughout everybody and it was more inside-out basketball, but energy was there and the things we did in practice we actually applied to this game."

Boston
 Starters Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  R. Allen G 32:17 6-8 1-3 2-2 +21 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 15 
  R. Rondo G 30:37 7-11 0-0 0-0 +20 1 1 11 4 2 0 1 0 14 
  K. Perkins C 26:16 4-9 0-0 2-2 +17 3 8 2 2 0 0 1 1 10 
  P. Pierce F 32:25 4-7 3-5 2-2 +18 2 6 6 2 3 0 1 2 13 
  K. Garnett F 26:14 7-10 0-1 4-4 +13 0 4 1 0 2 0 0 3 18 
 Bench Min FG 3Pt FT +/- Off Reb Ast TO Stl BS BA PF Pts 
  R. Wallace 21:32 5-12 2-7 0-0 +6 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 12 
  M. Daniels 21:11 3-5 0-0 4-6 +3 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 10 
  S. Williams 19:32 2-5 0-0 2-2 +4 4 6 1 2 0 1 0 4
  E. House 17:42 2-7 1-2 0-0 +1 0 2 1 3 0 1 0 3
  L. Hudson 6:02 1-2 0-1 0-0 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
  J.R. Giddens 4:05 0-1 0-0 0-0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
  B. Walker 2:07 0-0 0-0 0-0 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  T. Allen DNP - Coach's Decision
  G. Davis DNP - Coach's Decision
  B. Scalabrine DNP - Coach's Decision
 Totals 41-77 7-19 16-18 12 33 30 15 7 3 3 17 105 
 Percentages:   .532 .368 .889   Team Rebounds: 6

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

true enough Greg.

They looked much sharper.

The energy level was strong.

I loved the ball movement. That four pass deal starting and ending with Rondo was magnificent.

They probed the defense often and well.

If we are to pick on anything it might be that the interior defense was a bit slow at times and they were out rebounded. They aren’t rebounding as well as last season yet.

PP quietly had a solid game and KG still gets around pretty good.

Love what the role players are doing so far.

I guess the question how long they can keep it up before needing to revisit it all again.

by Tom Halzack on Nov 12, 2009 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

But still couldn't beat

the second best team in the West. The Suns stomped your ass on your home court. If you were wondering how to beat the Suns the Lakers showed you how to do it last night.

Reality check given!!

by Big Reality on Nov 13, 2009 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

So do we need to consult with the Nuggets

about how to take down the Lakers? …or maybe we should talk to the Mavs?

by Hal Jordan on Nov 14, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Their defensive rotations were quick and correct. That’s why they won the game. The rebounding differential doesn’t bother me. They were outrebounded on the offensive glass because the Jazz missed so many more shots.

by Brickowski on Nov 12, 2009 12:28 PM EST reply actions  

While I realize...

that it’s impossible to win an argument like this when you hold the other team to 86 points…

I said ‘a bit slow at times’ and it was….moreso with the second unit, but it happened with the first unit as well.

There were times that Rasheed, Marquis, KG and Perk all rotated to meet a driving Jazz player a bit slow on certain plays and they usually scored on those plays. Because the Celtics had the lead and then extended it minimized any significance to that happening…but it doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen.

 The Celtics had been holding teams to 34 points in the paint this year. The Jazz scored 46. Whatever success the Jazz did have, that is where they had it.

If you take the 0-10 from three point land away the Jazz shot over 50%. As it was, they shot .468% which is not terrible.

Granted, it is nit picking. But even when the Cs were 27-2 they weren’t doing everything right.

No doubt, they generally overwhelmed the Jazz and for the most part they were energetic and prompt on their rotations.

Add in the high turnovers (and points off of them = 21 TOs for 25 points) and you have a 20 point win.

by Tom Halzack on Nov 12, 2009 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Rebounding

This is more of a question than comment. The Celtics have for years had a problem with offensive rebounds (by other team). My thought on this is that our defensive rotations often take us out of rebounding position on our own glass. Also, if we clog the paint other teams take long shots and we don’t seem to do well with long rebounds; whereas, other teams use them to start fast breaks. I wonder if this is something we are willing to give up when we are so successful with the type of defense we are capable of playing.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Nov 12, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

fair thoughts

The mediocrity of the Celtics in that stat (off. rebounds) has been noted by Hollinger and other pundits. A prevailing belief (by Hollinger, I think) is the one you stated…the Cs concentrate so much on interior defense and taking care of the defensive boards (where they are very, very good) that they are more concerned with transitioning back than attacking the glass on their offensive end.

so maybe also logical that Doc says one thing they have to work on is…. transition defense.

The Cs rebounding differential this year is just 0.9 so far. They are way down the NBA list. The last two years they were second (4.5) overall and tied for 3rd (+3.1).

Of the two stats, while both are important, if you have to choose, I’m of the opinion that controlling the defensive boards is somewhat higher in importance.

I don’t remember where, but somewhere I read that their is a much closer relationshiop between winning and defensive boards than teams that are strong offensive rebounding teams.

by Tom Halzack on Nov 12, 2009 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

rebounds...

more defensive boards would mean the opponent’s shots are not falling and more offensive boards means your shots are not falling, I’d rather have the defensive boards.

by jeric on Nov 12, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

whenever i missed a game the first thing i look at is

the box score and it always thrills me if there are at least three players that scored in double figures, not necessarily in a breakout game kind of double figures but in a solid 10-18 point game numbers since that would mean that the win was a team effort and not just due to one player performing exceptionally well that they won. If everyone contributed then it would mean that the other team sure had their hands full since they would have to guard each player on the court and could not leave an open man to help out on another since everyone on the floor is a potential threat that would burn you if you leave him just enough room to operate (ray comes to mind immediately, leave him just enough room to get his shot up and you will be schooled on jump shooting 101)

by jeric on Nov 12, 2009 12:35 PM EST reply actions  

Passing was impressive

The C’s put on a passing clinic for most of the game. Doc must have stressed ball movement in their recent practices.
As Tenacious noted, THE play was Rondo passing out from under the basket, seeing the ball touch 3 players before Rondo gets it back under the basket for a layup.
Nice!
I know it’s just been 9 games, but right now SWilliams is looking as good or better than Davis or Powe were off the bench. He’s still raw, but he battles inside, has a nice short jumper, plays solid D and hits his free throws.

by LuckyNumber07 on Nov 12, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah the passing was crisp

30 assists says it all. I really think a line like Rondo had with a few more rebounds and a turnover or two less would be perfect for him this season.

by Greg Payne on Nov 12, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Passing

The play where Rondo ended up with an easy layup was beautiful to watch. I think every player on the floor touched the ball and I don’t think the ball hit the floor once.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Nov 12, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Almost

Pierce didn’t touch it, but that’s way beyond the point. It was such a sick play. No defense (not even the ’85 Bears) could have defended that play. It also speaks to their basketball IQs, like the fact that Rondo had the sense to cut to the hoop just as KG was getting the ball at the FT line.

by Greg Payne on Nov 12, 2009 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

A good, but unexciting, win and Kirilenko

There will be a lot of games like this. That’s good and bad. The bad was our defense was solid but in the boring way of switches, showing on the ball handler, hands in passing lanes. Not as fan-tastic as steals and blocks. The good was the ball rotation and the even scoring. You really expected a 3rd or 4th Qtr clamp-down. I like to see them call Perk’s number. That guy is such an example of work ethic. He was such an oaf the first few years.

Kirilenko needs a change of scenery and I’d love it to be Boston. The guy has every skill necessary to fill the stat line but just doesn’t. My seats are close to floor and I watched him a lot. He’s an enigmatic guy but very unselfish. I wonder if he wouldn’t flourish under Doc for whatever reason he hasn’t under Sloan.

by Wildblu1 on Nov 12, 2009 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

Minutes are steady

One thing that I am happy to see in the box score is the consistency (relatively) of the starters minutes. If Doc keeps this up, we will avoid those serious injuries that happen when a player gets tired legs

by Staubach on Nov 12, 2009 4:12 PM EST reply actions  

Minutes

I don’t think this was ever a Doc problem. Doc now has a great bench to work with and that allows him to keep minutes down if he wants. What is intriguing about this bench is that when someone comes in he is immediately into the game. No need to run up and down the floor a few times. Wallace mentioned this earlier when he said he likes coming off the bench because he gets a feel for the game from watching so that when he comes in he has an idea of what is needed from him.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Nov 12, 2009 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Rhythm

I know I always forget about the “rhythm” factor in terms of minutes. Doc always cites that as his reason for playing guys at least 30-35 minutes per night, even when he doesn’t necessarily need to. With that in mind though, I really don’t want to see Ray Allen start a 4th quarter again when we’re already up by 30 points haha. Bill Walker should be more than capable in that instance.

by Greg Payne on Nov 12, 2009 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

It wasn't 30, it was 22

and Doc was just sticking with his regular rotation at that point, having Allen come back for Pierce, as he did in the 1st half. 22 is just not a blowout in the NBA after 3, sorry. He did exactly as he should, play it the way he would if it was a closer game, then see if the next few minutes either extended or held the lead, and then take Ray out for good and finish the game with all reserves. It is easy for fans to think of games as blowouts but coaches don’t assume those things as quickly, they want to really make sure the game is in hand before just blowing up the rotation and throwing in all the scrubs.

by KJ33 on Nov 12, 2009 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I know last night wasn't 30

I wasn’t talking about last night…There were some other instances this season when it happened like against Charlotte and Chicago when the margins were 27 and 26. Last night wasn’t a blowout in my eyes at all.

by Greg Payne on Nov 12, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice to have Walker back

Yeah, nice to have Walker back. Doc will have some “nice problems” when Davis returns as well. Will they package something at midseason for a backup PG? I am not sure they need it now, unless they trade Giddens just to open a spot up for Lue

by Staubach on Nov 13, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi