The Latest Nocioni Rumor
Marc Stein give us the following scoop on TrueHoop.
There is some hope, according to NBA front-office sources, for a three-way deal that is currently in the exploratory-discussion phase.
Sources told ESPN.com that the Philadelphia 76ers and Sacramento Kings, in considering the feasibility of a Samuel Dalembert-for-Kenny Thomas swap, have discussed expanding that concept with Boston by trying to draw in the Celtics on a potential three-way deal that would land Andres Nocioni with the Celts.
Sources further stressed over the past 48 hours that this should be classified as an ongoing conversation as the teams involved decide how much they like what's on the table.
But the full deal as it stands, if it eventually gets that far, would send Nocioni to Boston, Kenny Thomas, Tony Allen and Brian Scalabrine to Philadelphia and Dalembert and J.R. Giddens to Sacramento.
Taking the teams one by one:
*Boston has had interest in Nocioni from the minute Sacramento acquired him in February in the deal that dispatched Brad Miller and John Salmons to Chicago. That said, Boston has also been hesitant since February about acting upon that interest because Nocioni has three years and more than $20 years left on his contract after this season. That's a lot of long-term cash for the Celts to take on -- even if Nocioni turned out to be a James Posey-style Mr. Versatile for them -- after they just signed Rajon Rondo to a lucrative extension and with decisions about the futures of Paul Pierce and Ray Allen looming. So Boston pulling out because of financial concerns likely ranks as the biggest impediment to this deal.
Very interesting.
As Stein stresses, this sounds like an ongoing discussion rather than something imminent, but it is good food for discussion on a non-game day.
I've detailed the pros and cons of such a deal in the past. It only makes sense to discuss it and we know a similar deal was discussed last year.
Personally I think I'd roll the dice. He's a hard nosed competitor that needs a winning environment to really shine his brightest. His deal is rather large, but the cap number actually decreases each year and the price of picking him up is dirt cheap (expiring deals). He's even on the south side of 30, so he'll be a good piece for the present and near future.
Still, that's a big check to cut, so I wouldn't be shocked or dismayed to see the team pass.
What do you think?
Update: Via the Herald
On another front, a team source denied that the Celtics are in discussions to join a three-team deal that would land them Sacramento swingman Andres Nocioni. The team simply doesn’t have the flexibility to absorb Nocioni’s contract, which pays him $20.5 million over the next three seasons.
0 recs |
85 comments
|
Comments
Do it, Danny! We get rid of some junk (TA, JR), we lose Scal but we get back a player who fits this team perfectly. Paul finally gets a backup and Nocioni can be that small shooting 4 we have been missing since Posey left.
Nocioni`s contract is quite big but it is decreasing and it expires the same year as Sheed`s and KG`s. And if we extend Ray for around 7 million next season (+Eddie, Daniels) we should be at around same cap number as this year, so it shouldn`t be a problem…
Nocioni can hit the three and is a very gritty defender. A little dirty, played in a lot of big games in Europe and with his NT team, so he would be a great fit here.
We would have a superb 10 man rotation if this actually happened…
by thebirdman on Nov 17, 2009 6:36 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
So for the next two years we could have Nocioni for 13.5m or Scal for 4m….
Don’t hold your breath, Noc fans.
by D Dub on Nov 17, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Noc wasn’t overpaid, then I would’ve said yes.
by Justin_Bobo on Nov 17, 2009 4:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That money could be put to better use in the future.
That money limits the C’s options over the next couple of seasons in free agency. If ownership is willing to spend, and spend some more in the future, then it’s all good. But if they’re not, I’d pass due to financial considerations.
It would be beautiful to see House + Daniels + Nocioni + Sheed complete a nine man rotation.
by Who on Nov 17, 2009 7:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
it has more-or-less no cap implications in the next two years
it’s more about wyc’s tolerance to spend
by ssspence on Nov 17, 2009 7:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Luxury tax implications
Those are the implications of this deal—it basically handicaps our ability to resign Marquis and Ray Allen (next year) and possibly Perk the next year. All for a non-defending perimeter-oriented player…doesn’t make sense.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Nov 17, 2009 7:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
100% agree Salmon
Whatever it is I am against it – Groucho Marx
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Nov 17, 2009 12:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ownership’s willingness to continue spending + pay an even increasing rising payroll … is my concern.
If Wyc and Co are fine with that then I’d love to have Nocioni here. If they’re not, or even somewhat uneasy with it, then I’d rather pass on the opportunity because I believe the Celtics can get better use of that money in future seasons.
by Who on Nov 17, 2009 8:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like the deal itself
But Nocioni is an expensive player. I’m not sure he’s worth that money. Didn’t we not pay Posey that kind of money just to be a “Posey-like” player? I know age factored into that, so maybe the fact that Nocioni’s younger will help such a deal go through.
by Greg Payne on Nov 17, 2009 7:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Those expiring contracts are worth something and to tie up $20MM on
Nocioni is concerning. He’s a good player but better options may be available next summer.
by Surferdad on Nov 17, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No question I do that deal. We’re not giving up anything useful.
by CoachBo on Nov 17, 2009 7:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Money is useful. Especially when we want to sign guys next year.
by guava_wrench on Nov 17, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
anpther old guy...
i for one would wait and look for younger legs
by ssspence on Nov 17, 2009 7:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
He´s 29
That´s not old, that is his prime.
by Casperian on Nov 17, 2009 8:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Nocioni is past his prime. He’s been in decline over the past two seasons. Nocioni’s best days are behind him.
However, I do think he can maintain his current level of performance over the next couple of seasons.
by Who on Nov 17, 2009 8:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nocioni is well past his prime
He’s been playing pro basketball since he was like 8. He was a much better player 3 years ago, and he’s beat up.
by ssspence on Nov 17, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No 29-year-old is past his prime.
Maybe we have a different definition of the term ‘prime’, but to me it means a span of time, rather than a certain point.
From age 26-31, players have the best combination of athleticism and experience. We would get Noc´s two best years, theoretically.
I also don´t know where all this “bad defender” talk is coming from.
He is neither slow nor unathletic. Most Sf´s we´ll face are Power 3`s, anyway.
I think the praise he gets from Kings fans speaks for itself.
by Casperian on Nov 17, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not arguing...
the details but…
Nocioni will be 30 on November 30th.
by tenaciousT on Nov 17, 2009 10:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What I do hate about ESPN's reporting
is that they never acknowledge Team or Player options and the likelihood of exercising such options or not. They always list players like Pierce as potential ‘10 free agents, when there’s about at .0000001% chance he’ll opt out of his contract and become a free agent. Much more likely is that he’d take the option for 20 mil and enter free agency in 2011.
Same with Nocioni. Sure, there’s the POSSIBILITY of 3 years 20+ after this year, but in ACTUALITY it’s two years at about 6.5 and then a TEAM OPTION for 7+ for the third year. so, really, he’ll expire the same year as KG if the team doesn’t want him around any more.
They do this all the time and it’s lazy.
by Fan from VT on Nov 17, 2009 7:46 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
in Danny we trust
we’ve got ending contracts and a chance to open roster spots for other additions…eg-Lue?..if Danny likes him than sign me up …but maybe we get a better salary dump come feb??
by Motown on Nov 17, 2009 7:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This deal is still terrible
People act like it’s a question of swapping non-performers for Nocioni, but there is way more to this deal. It’s about taking on MLE salary for a poor defending, perimeter oriented player. Don’t we have enough questionable defense and perimeter orientation on the 2nd unit already?
Fact is, if Nocioni came aboard, we’d have trouble justifying resigning Daniels next season, and would be pinched in our ability to resign Ray and Perk (after next season). All three of those players are better and more important than Nocioni…
He’s the book on Nocioni—too slow to guard 3s, too short to guard 4s…his only plus skill is his 3 point percentage, but his overall shooting #s aren’t that good.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Nov 17, 2009 7:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I doubt it would have a huge effect...
We could still maintain a payroll roughly similar to this year’s, if Ray took around $8 million. That would give us approximately $6 million to sign free agents, including Daniels, Williams, and House. Since the luxury tax may go up, we’d have a small amount of additional flexibility.
The following year, when it’s time to re-sign Perk, Pierce’s deal will have expired. Assuming Pierce re-signs for somewhere between $14 and $16 million annually, there would be plenty of money to re-sign Perk and maintain the current payroll.
Of course, Wyc could always decide that he wants to reduce the budget. However, if he keeps it where it is, we should be fine.
As for Nocioni’s defense, it’s better than you suggest, and he’s a tough, gritty player.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
by Roy_Hobbs on Nov 17, 2009 8:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, Roy. We’ve been through this “no defense” canard before, and defense played in a poor situation doesn’t register for me. I’m not really interested in one-on-one defense played within the Sacramento system. I’m looking at feet, at lateral quickness and at work ethic. There’s no question in my mind that Nocioni can play the kind of defense we would ask.
It’s a little bit like the Shelden Williams acquisition – viewed as a stand-alone player, it looks questionable. But championship basketball should never be viewed that way. These guys are plug-and-play, and the question is can they deliver in their likely role? The easy answer for Nocioni is yes.
There’s also no question that he would benefit, as a shooter, from superior ball movement.
This is a deal you make without blinking, exchanging excess baggage and wasted payroll for a useful contributor to a championship team.
by CoachBo on Nov 17, 2009 8:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
To continue, the really questionable part of this deal, to me, is the Philly return: Kenny Thomas and a bag of Danny’s garbage for Sammy D? Ugh. Lousy return.
by CoachBo on Nov 17, 2009 8:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
PHI is all over this deal. They have been trying to get rid of Dalambert for quite some time now. If they can get expirings for him they would be delighted…
by thebirdman on Nov 17, 2009 8:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on value of Nocioni...however...
What i’m trying to determine is where his role would come from…Nocioni is most valuable as a 3/4 player – able to take minutes at 2 spots…but the team is already looking at a minutes crunch with KG/Davis/Williams all looking very competent at the 4, so where does Nocioni fit into that equation?
Pierce is giving up 15-20 mpg on any given night thus far, but those minutes are helping to get Daniels onto the court as he is backing up both wing positions in essence – or coming in with Eddie as a combo-guard duo.
Nocioni seems like a specialist on this team, and that’s some heavy coin to pay for such a luxury item…perhaps if they were to let Eddie walk next season Nocioni would have a more justifiable role relative to his pay stub, with Daniels getting the backcourt minutes and Nocioni coming in behind Pierce, etc…
Bottom line, i really like the way Williams is looking and that gives the team options when it comes to determining future moves – Davis and Williams become “chips” for potential trades based on as of now unforseen scenarios…however, that’s quite a price to pay (6.5 mill) just to hold some trade options.
While a discounted Ray and Paul re-signing would clearly keep the payroll in line with its current mark, players still want to compete and too many good players is not always a “good thing” despite the cliche statement to the affirmative – Davis for one is a player who will gripe immediately if he doesn’t have a significant role…who else will start to chafe when they are waiving towels and not seeing action?
Interesting to say the least – love Nocioni and would feel good about the team if he was here – but he’s gotta have a clear slot to fit into this lineup.
by BillfromBoston on Nov 17, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll say this right now
If House keeps playing all season the way he has the last five games, he may not be back.
by Tai on Nov 17, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bill makes a good point
The available role is not expansive enough to warrant the acquisition…
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Nov 17, 2009 7:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, that should be our biggest concern with this acquisition.
by Casperian on Nov 17, 2009 7:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The big question is whether or not the owners are willing to keep this big payroll. The C’s are way over in luxury tax land. According to hoopshype.com we have the 3rd biggest payroll in the league.
Plus that assumption Paul Pierce will sign for less. You can’t know that.
The only true assumptions you can make is that yes Ray Allen will got less but Perk will cost way more than he is now and Rondo already gets way more. Also I don’t think that Daniels will sign for this money for another year. He stated that he could have got more and looking at his play he will get more next year.
by dexter11 on Nov 17, 2009 8:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Agree
I know it’s not my money, but it’s about the same money for this year. The problems is next year when Rondo’s salary kicks in. If Ray doesn’t take a smaller contract then we’d either have to let him walk or pay a bigger tax bill. That’s a Management issue they must decide if they can and are willing to spend those dollars. I can understand if they say NO. In looking at Noc’s salary it’s a little high, but not terrible. It looks like he has 2 years left with a Team Option. As you said, once the Big 3 come up for new contracts hopefully they will take cuts, they’ve made their money. I don’t see other teams putting out big, long term contracts for them anyway.
I really like the guy and woud love to see us get him. One thing we don’t have is a lot of real toughness – someone who will punch you in the mouth tough. Perk, maybe Williams and that’s it. Noc will punch you in the mouth and stomp on you while your on the ground.
He can also play. He’s, of course, a very physical defender (ask PP about his defense), has a decent shot, he’s unselfish, and won’t complain about coming off the bench. He has a lot of skills/foundamental that are taught to former European players that many US players don’t ever acquire.
The problem with letting TA, Scal, JR and even Ray leaving this summer is that we can’t use those dollars to replace them. We would still be over the cap so we’d only have the MLE or Vet Mins to use to acquire players. Using TA, Scal and JR now gives us a pretty decent player for the next 2 or 3 years. It would also free up 2 roster spots that we could use on a player in the D League or someone waived later in the season or maybe take a findat a real backup PG (Antonio Daniels is still available and another play I like). Course that depend on management spending the extra dollars on salary and the tax.
Lastly, it frees up BBD to be a valueable trade chip. He’s young with a decent contract that can be moved fairly easily this summer once his BYC tag changes.
by badax33 on Nov 17, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
we need a better return for these contracts
we have very few assets to bring in talent over the next couple of years. if the Celtics are going to compete over the next couple of years they NEED to reload with more young talent liek rondo. nocioni is a lateral move this year and a burden beyond.
by ssspence on Nov 17, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nocioni is tough
I really like him for his toughness and scrapiness—he definitely plays with an edge that I welcome in any player. That doesn’t make up for that fact that his feet aren’t quick enough to defend small forwards and he’s not strong enough to defend power forwards.
My concerns stem more from the fact that he’s overpaid and he’d represent a further move towards perimeter-oriented basketball, something this team has become too dependent upon. I’d rather us improve our athleticism and perimeter defense than add another perimeter shooter. We have enough shooters on what is supposed to be a defensive team. It’s about balance.
by SalmonAndMashedPotatoes on Nov 17, 2009 7:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree 100%
It’s one of those deals where Ainge will look back a year from now and say “Boy, was I dumb.”
by Brickowski on Nov 17, 2009 10:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Where did people get the idea that Nocioni is a poor defender? It is like some of you have never seen him play…
by thebirdman on Nov 17, 2009 8:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sac Kings Fan Here
Very true statement, I didnt get those posts above either when reading them. Nocioni is an above average defender, and makes up for any weaknesses with straight heart. He would fit in perfect with a roster like the Celts have. He would bring energy and some good three point shooting while Allen rests. He held Durant to an awful night shooting a week ago, and hit a four point play to help pull out the victory. In fact Noc has been one of the main reasons we’ve won 4 in a row after Kevin Martin’s injury.
If he were 4 or 5 years younger, i’d be pissed that the Kings were trying to trade him; but thats cause were rebuilding. I for sure would of loved a player like him on the old Webber/ Bibby led teams. Just straight hard nose defense, and tough a nails. (If he doesnt end up on the floor at least 3 times a game, its not a typical Noc game)
by Gilo424 on Nov 17, 2009 9:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do it Dan!
Make it happen!
Philly wants, Sactown wants some changes and we want more power for our bench!
by greenwise on Nov 17, 2009 9:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Shouldn't we consider ....
Marreese Speights injury in all of this?
I wonder if that info in the article was processed before the Speights injury.
Brand is not playing well and that would leave Kenny Thomas and Jason Smith as their center options
by tenaciousT on Nov 17, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure how I feel ...
about Nocioni.
There are things I like, but I understand the hesitation by some on this one. If I had watched him play more lately it would help, I think.
by tenaciousT on Nov 17, 2009 10:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
personnel-wise, it's a no-brainer
Just in terms of the talent exchange, C’s come out way ahead.
The crux of the deal is the $. Nocioni would be getting paid a lot of money for the bench—highest salary I believe of the bench brigade. Sheed and BBD have their $ for after this year but Marquis, Williams and House may look to Noc’s contract and want more than they would offered by the C’s if Noc wasn’t with the team.
I wouldn’t be heartbroken to see House go – Hudson looks like he might be able to fill that spot next year-better ballhandler, defender, rebounder and has shown some range on his shot. Can also create his own shot if needed. Marquis and Williams have definitely shown they’re worth more than they’re getting paid currently.
The thing to keep in mind regarding team salary is that the team isn’t bringing in any significant FA’s while the big 3 are still here and collecting big paychecks. Danny’s best option for this year through next summer is using trades to solidify the bench and if the trades can solidify it for multiple years, that’s even better.
Moving TA, Scal and Giddens to bring in a performer is a good step in that direction. If Hudson can show he’s capable of filling Eddie’s shoes offensively this year, (definitely not my expectations but I wouldn’t be surprised if he took Eddie’s spot next year), House will be moved too. Next year, if Williams is brought back, don’t be surprised to see BBD and Walker moved to reinforce the bench brigade (unless BBD and Walker are both playing exceptionally well as bench players).
by slamtheking on Nov 17, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Don't Know Much About Nocioni And This Deal But
That’s why Danny makes the big bucks. He needs to look at today, but also into the future and answer two questions. Will Nocioni make the team better. Will the cost cause us problems in the future. As one poster noted we may not be able to re-sign several of our present good players if this is done. Fans are in panic mode now because of 2 straight losses, but Danny is great at seeing past that.
"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn
by TrueGreen on Nov 17, 2009 11:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'd be all over this deal
For TA, Scal, and JR? A hardnosed 3-4, gives us the option of playing some small ball, can stroke the 3 ala Posey, can give Pierce some much needed rest. I think it’d be the end of running PP or Ray into the ground. Contract runs for 2 more years after this, just like KG and Sheed’s (not even counting the 3rd year at team option).
People are so concerned about what this does to our financial flexibility in the future. I, for one, think that THIS year is our best chance for a championship, considering age of our big 3 and Sheed. Sheed, KG, PP, and Ray will all be another year slower and beyond their primes next year (let alone two years from now), so we need to be maximizing our chances this year, not being overly concerned about salary implications next year and the year after.
I hope Danny pulls the trigger on this. Then, the final piece would be adding a vet PG (if that’s making Lue a player, then so be it).
by Mencius on Nov 17, 2009 11:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
they really should take this deal.
Nothing is guaranteed in basketball and with Boston’s aging core, how can you pass this up ? Giving up next to nothing for Nocioni is a gift !
Deals like this don’t come around often. He’s a perfect player to come to Boston.
by Snowball on Nov 17, 2009 11:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
by the way
House’s continued effectiveness is not guaranteed and Daniels has not really proven himself here in the regular season.
I actually would rather have Nocioni than House.
He’s a better all-around player in my opinion.
by Snowball on Nov 17, 2009 11:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hate it
Nocioni hasnt been productive in 2 years. He will absolutley destroy any opportunity to sign any new players in the next 2 years, especially with the bad economic climate, there should be some good players available for cheap. A la Marquis and Sheed this year. No reason that more players might find themselves out of work…If your going to work cheap, might as well be with the championship caliber celts…
Nocioni is a horrible player, but he is horribly overpaid and probably isnt going to be getting much better…I think it really limits this teams options going further and its not really worth it.
by shiggins on Nov 17, 2009 11:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Does the deal help us win NOW?
If so, then isn’t it worth it?
By the way, is he really that lousy a defender? Seems like not so much of a deal if he can’t guard the 3 spot.
Also re: PP re-sign $$$ – I have a feeling he’ll restructure or at least sign for long years and smaller salary – something like 5 years/ 40-45. I think he wants to cement his legacy here and will take the hometown discount to do it.
by chunnamark on Nov 17, 2009 12:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’d kinda rather just keep Scal… He gives us 3pt shooting at the 3/4 and plays gritty defense too, just for a fraction of the cost.
A couple things:
We don’t need to upgrade this roster now, we are bulletproof 1-9;
and looking to next year I don’t think Ray will be looking to take an 8 figure pay cut, and in that scenario I’d prefer any extra $ go towards keeping Daniels and Perk over Nocioni.
And we’ll still be able to re-sign Scal for vet min $ and get 85% of what Noc would have given us anyways without the risk.
by D Dub on Nov 17, 2009 12:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
if we were to take large contract, why not sjax?
not even trying (sounds like so)?
by friedgreentomatoes on Nov 17, 2009 12:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
To Shiggins
We really have no chance of siging any free agents in the next 2 years. Without Ray and with PP opting out this summer we’d be a 42M. That wouldn’t allow us to sign a max player. Also, do we want to sign Quisy, Eddie and or Williams that comes out first (cap holds). If we renounce, those guys, we’d have to replace with Vet min because we really wouldn’t have the MLE next year as that is rolled in to the cap. So how do we sign free agents?
Further, my guess is that we are going to sign Qusiy for probably 3 years at about 10M using the MLE and possibly use some of the MLE for Eddie and maybe Williams. I think we’ll try to sign Ray for 3 years 27-30M. Then depending on PP who can opt out, I’m hoping he won’t or will take a lower salary to keep the squad together as comprised. And we’ll need to sign Perk after next year and it won’t be for 4M either closer to 8-10M per year.
Maybe you can tell me how we sign FAs with the way our cap and team is currently structured. I don’t see it unless we renounce Ray and PP and then KG and Perk when their deals are up. Of course that means 20 win seasons and the lottery!!!!!
by badax33 on Nov 17, 2009 12:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why would Sacramento do Nacioni + Thomas for crap (Dalembert + Giddens)?
by P2 on Nov 17, 2009 12:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Crap for Crap
And let me add that no one ever got rich trading with Geoff Petrie.
by Brickowski on Nov 17, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Giving up 3
Trading 3 essentially expiring players, no matter who they are, for Nocioni sounds terrible to me. With Sheed and Baby coming back, we really don’t need any more perimeter-shooting 3/4s, and Tony is a much better defensive player than Nocioni. Worse, I don’t see how it helps us this year. Nocioni’s “gritty”, but he isn’t good.
by Ersatz on Nov 17, 2009 1:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm for it
Assume they make the cap room by getting Allen and Pierce down on their next deals, plus letting House roll at years end. Sheldon is not worth more, he’s an almost big body and solid, but he’s not more than a fourth big man, you can find a guy to fill that spot again for a vet min.
They come back next year with:
Perk / Sheed
KG / Baby
Pierce / Noccioni
Allen / Daniels
Rondo / Hudson
plus Walker and a 1st, in the current rotation, the only guys you can upgrade are Sheldon and House, and Noccioni allows you to do both (IMO.)
by Brendan on Nov 17, 2009 1:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
what about
Marreese Speights just went down for a few months and so Dalambert is now starting center. Brand isn’t back fully yet for the sixers. When would this trade take place if it happened? Does the Speights injury put any kind of damper on this?
by PatsCeltsSoxs on Nov 17, 2009 1:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
My guess, no.
Brand is struggling, and there’s been discussion of late that Jordan will make him the 76ers sixth man and second-string center. Yet the team’s long term interests – and chemistry – would seemingly be better served by sending their moody, overpaid Canadian big man out of town instead.
Jordan could still reshuffle his starting lineup, with one eye towards Speights’ end of season return.
Brand could hold on to his starting job and pride (with four years and some $60+ million left on his current contract…)
And Philadelphia’s ownership saves money.
by The Walker Wiggle on Nov 17, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a Nocioni fan.
The above trade would also open up two roster spots, possibly making room for an unemployed, one-time Ainge infatuation:
Robert Swift
Allen Iverson? Hmm?
by The Walker Wiggle on Nov 17, 2009 1:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
From a talent standpoint of view, it makes a lot of sense to trade for Nocioni. Nocioni would be the best player in the deal, and after that we would probably sign a player who is better than any of Tony/Scal/Giddens.
by P2 on Nov 17, 2009 2:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
We don’t need anymore scorers. i’d say get one more marquis daniels type player. a young guy. please don’t get ai!
by vgarcia890 on Nov 17, 2009 2:38 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
update
http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/celtics/index.php/2009/11/17/pierce-practices-2/
On another front, a team source denied that the Celtics are in discussions to join a three-team deal that would land them Sacramento swingman Andres Nocioni. The team simply doesn’t have the flexibility to absorb Nocioni’s contract, which pays him $20.5 million over the next three seasons.
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Nov 17, 2009 2:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"Nicotine" is not the answer!
Although, bidding farewell to TA and Scal sounds very appealing.
by Title 18 on Nov 17, 2009 3:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
could be nocioni and could be others
we gotta use scal/ta/giddy ’s contracts to get some body who could really help the big 3.
banner 18 + banner 19 lets do it danny!
by friedgreentomatoes on Nov 17, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If I'm DA
There is no way I do this deal. Nocioni’s contract is way to big considering what his production would likely be. And having that kind of contract on the books totally kills our financial flexibility.
Pass
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 17, 2009 3:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
To big for what???
Another championship. Let’s face facts. The C’s aren’t sniffing anywhere near the cap threshold and lux tax is pretty much the inevitable truth for ANY team in today’s NBA that WANTS TO WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP. If you can turn FLUFF into Nocioni with the current position the Celts are in, you do it without blinking an eye. THis is a a NO-BRAINER for the Celts if they’re truly committed to winning a title THIS year, and possibly next year as well. Future be damned! The FUTURE IS NOW.
Gotta prevent those DAMN lakers from creeping up on the C’s title count!
by Smills91 on Nov 17, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair point
However, I for one believe that this team is perfectly capable of winning the title this year and next year as is. 1-12 there is no team in the league that is better than Boston, and I’m not a homer for thinking that. IMO its not even debatable.
I really think some Celts fans are overestimating how good Nocioni is. I live in Illinois and have watched plenty of Bulls games through the years. I’m very familiar with his game and I have never been overly impressed. I say leave the team as is, and when Walker is healthy, give him some run to backup Paul.
Then maybe we can actually develop some young talent for when Pierce/KG/Ray make their exits. Lets not forget we just locked up Rondo for 5 more years. To completely throw away an plans for the future would totally negate that investment.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 18, 2009 12:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If you´re trying to ride two horses ar the same time, you´ll end up nowhere.
This idea that we can contend for a championship and at the same time develop young talent that is actually able to contribute is a nice dream, but nothing more.
A 20-year-old and a 36-year-old don´t equal two 28-year-old players.
by Casperian on Nov 18, 2009 12:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lol are you serious?
That’s a cute analogy but you’re wrong. We can absolutely contend for a championship and develop young contributing players at the same time.
Case in point, what do you think the Celtics were doing with Rondo and Powe in ‘08? I’d even through Perk in that category too. The Lakers did it last year with the continued growth of Bynum and Ariza. The Pistons did it with Prince. And the Spurs have done it all decade (Parker, Ginobili, and Stephen Jackson earlier on, etc.).
All those teams I just mentioned didn’t only contend for championships, they actually won them. I can think of more examples but I think you get the idea.
Look, if this deal ends up going through and Nocioni is the Godsend that most people on this blog seem to making him out to be, I’ll be more than happy to let you all say you told me so. I’m just not seeing it in this deal.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 18, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing is:
Acquiring Noc doesn’t ruin any of the youth the Celts have acquired, as Scal/Allen/Giddens are just expirings at this point. Adding a gritty, skilled vet like Noc is a no-brainer, as I think it gives the C’s the clear advantage in the East and likely overall for the title.
by Smills91 on Nov 19, 2009 6:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'd do the deal
admitedly I haven’t seen Noce play in a while but I always thought he was a tough, hard nosed guy who made things happen. He can defend, has an inside game and can hit the outside shot. He also rebounds well. I don’t see a problem with him Baby and SHelden. Having Nocioni would allow KG more rest both in games and in practice and it would help fill the void until baby gets back. I think he would pair well with baby or williams up front and on a second unit with house, sheed and Daniels he would provide an inside game as well as interior defense. I’ve grown to like scal and he is a heady player for us but he’s had at least 3 concussions and is one hit away from never playing again and tony allen can’t get on the court because of injuries. JR giddens may become a player but he’s not one now. If we did this deal we also open up roster spots plus PT for walker at the 3. We could sign sweetney and develop him and we could also sign another guard- preferably one who can defend the perimter and shoot the deep ball/ so overall I like this deal a lot.
by Red2 on Nov 17, 2009 4:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
But More than That
You’re right in that NOC is another guy who can play the 4. But, I think, that Noc would also play more 3, which means that both PP and Ray get more rest. We are seeing that Quisy is playing SG/PG with Eddie and that either PP or Ray are on the floor with the 2nd unit. This would eliminate that situation allowing both to get max rest during the regular season.
Here’s another option for next year. With Ray being at the end of his contract we could let him go at the end of the year (not my first choice) and pickup another shooter. As someone else pointed out, there will be people left out just like this year (where are Jerry Stackhouse or Rashad McCants today). PP would move the SG and Noc could start. That would actually knock us below the Luxury Tax threshold even if we resigned Quisy to a 3 yr 10M (part of MLE)and Eddie to a 2 yr 6M contract and add the shooter for either the Vet min or part of the MLE and even with a late 1st Rd pick should put us about $67M. I’m doing this without looking up our projected 2010 salaries but, I think, I’m pretty close. Again this is not my BEST option, I’d like to see Ray come back with a reduced salary 3 yr $27-30M.
by badax33 on Nov 17, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sixers
look, the sixers are playing for only 2 things: 1) a lottery pick and 2) cap space next summer so they can take a run at some big time free agents. Brand hasn’t worked out and speights is injured. i have no idea where tony allen and scal fit on this roster but if the sixers do this deal they’re waving the white flag
by Red2 on Nov 17, 2009 4:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Latest Update
I saw the Herald report that the Celts aren’t in the deal. However, when was the last time that Danny or anyone in the Celts organization said they were actively tryng to trade anyone. It seems to me that Danny even denied that he put Rondo on the market this summer. Later I think he said he put Rondo out only to “guage the interest and to try and determine a fair market value”. Coming from the Celts organization or any GM really doesn’t convince me that we aren’t invovled in the deal!!!!!!!!!!l
by badax33 on Nov 17, 2009 4:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
a bench of house, daniels, sheed, baby, sheldon walker and nocioni
would be unreal….cut the fat danny
by celticinorlando on Nov 17, 2009 5:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Do it
What’s all this fuss about next year? We add Nocioni, our bench becomes like another starting five. Anyone notice Pierce’s knee? Ahem.
Do it. Sweat next year next year. This year, to me, is our last chance at a title. I know that’s pretty alarmist, but if Danny’s got a chance to load up, load up!
by Big_Easy on Nov 17, 2009 7:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Right there with you, Big_Easy
Maximize the Old 3’s window, and I, like you, think this year is it. Legit championship windows don’t come around often. When they do, you gotta totally maximize them. I don’t get all the hand-wringing about financial flexibility 2 years from now. If Wyc, et al don’t cash in expirings on somebody that can help this year, I’ll be mightily disappointed.
by Mencius on Nov 17, 2009 7:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Old 3!
Hah, good one. You hit the nail on the head: maximize. It sounds like the updates are suggesting we don’t have the money to be a player here, so maybe it’s a moot point. But I’d do whatever it takes to load up. I just get really nervous about how all three are or have been injury prone. This is the year.
by Big_Easy on Nov 17, 2009 9:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
nocioni ?
it makes sense we are getting rid of expiring contracts and it,s all about winning the title the window is closing pretty soon this team is aging so it is a good gamble this trade would make us the beast of the east ..
by lohaus#54 on Nov 17, 2009 10:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
learn from the patriots’ example-you don’t just throw $$ around. nocioni is a good, hard nosed player but way too much salary. besides, as doc doesn’t play hudson but in garbage time, and now has eddied bringin the ball up, we need a backup point more.
by nazzbo on Nov 17, 2009 10:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
There are better deals out there. Nocioni just isn't that good.
Look at NY. They’re getting desperate and would love the expiring contracts. Scal, Tony Allen, and JR in expiring contracts could be worth almost 7million for a good player. You could pry Jared Jeffries from the Knicks and he would be a way better defender at the 4 than Nocioni. Plus Jeffries has only a 2 year deal.
Package Glen Davis, Tony Allen, Scal, and JR, and you could get back Monte Ellis. We would be a fastest backcourt in the NBA.
Even Minnesota is trying to dump salary, so why not Ryan Gomes for expiring deals? He’d be a perfect back up to Pierce and is a team guy.
These are just options that comes to mind at the moment. Basically, what it comes down to is that there are better deals out there, and if Danny waits, he’s going to get better deals, as teams fire sale on a losing season, or get desperate for Lebronanthon 2010.
by CN_extreme on Nov 18, 2009 2:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well said...
Patience is a virtue….a player of Nocioni`s calibre will not be the difference between winning a title and not winning a title.
by Title 18 on Nov 18, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs





























