Ugly Ugly Ugly
I have no idea how this team was even in the game tonight. They played horribly for most of the game with brief spurts of brilliance. The Magic just played a little less bad and earned a key early season win.
Some bullet points:
- Doc tells Sheed to take fewer 3's and the very next game he goes 0-8. With that said, most of them were good, open shots.
- Sheed seemed to do all the other little things right. It was that kind of night.
- Perkins picking up two quick fouls in the 3rd were big but Howard never really took advantage.
- Rondo sat for most of the 4th quarter. Was Doc sending a message or did he just want Eddie's shooting on the floor?
- I really like the little things that Marquis Daniels does on the floor. He won't fill up a stat sheet, but he helps you win games. That is when you aren't doing everything else to lose them.
- KG seemed to tweak his knee early in the 4th but he looked alright after that.
- Kept waiting for someone like Pierce or Ray or Rondo to take over the game and nobody did.
- I really don't like Vince Carter. Almost goes without saying, but I'm going to keep saying it.
- We really need a more consistent effort on defense. The offense will come and go, no big deal, but if we make stops more often, we win going away.
0 recs |
185 comments
|
Comments
kinda makes sense
We beat Cleveland, Cleveland beats Orlando, Orlando beats us.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 10:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Eh, not so much
The Celtics played fairly well for the bulk of the 2nd and 4th quarters but, as has been the case all year, they have no reliable knock-out punch when the 3s aren’t falling.
by snively on Nov 20, 2009 10:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
why did Rondo get benched?
and don’t tell me it was for Eddie’s shooting
by hpantazo on Nov 20, 2009 10:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yes, it was
they needed at least the threat of an outside shot to open the lane for Ray and Pierce.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 10:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
threat is all he gave them
he’s been in a terrible slump and didn’t exactly break out of it tonight
by hpantazo on Nov 20, 2009 10:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
could not shoot to save their lives
Took more shots.
Caused more turnovers.
Scored more in the paint.
But sucked from outside the paint.
And that foul call on Pierce just gift wrapped it for the Magic.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 10:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
we are looking old too early in season
Daniels was our best player tonight.
We had no business being that close that late in game.
Terrible team effort
This will not get it done.
by tommyfan on Nov 20, 2009 10:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
what was the final tally on us shooting 3’s? 2 for 22 ? i think doc needs to make a lineup change. we can’t keep getting off to bad starts like this. I think it’s time to bench ray and Perk and start marquis and wallace
by Red2 on Nov 20, 2009 10:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
if we do make some kind of big season trade
should marquis be considered in that trade? i have seen absolutely nothing from him the entire season. has he broke double figures even once?
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 10:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
strongly disagree
I really like his game – we could use more guys like him
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Nov 20, 2009 10:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i haven't seen his game
he gives Pierce and Ray some rest, but i can’t say that he does much else. maybe its just because he doesn’t get the minutes he did with the Pacers, but as much as he got in the preseason, I expected a lot more.
of course i also expected more out of sheed and rondo.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm aboard the Jeff/Quisy train on this
I’ve been pleasantly surprised so far: exactly what I expected in terms of his aggressiveness going to the rim, but less of the nonsense from outside the paint that derailed his shooting efficiency in past seasons. Like his energy at both ends of the floor so far, and frankly, I think he might be the best cutter (Ray excepted, perhaps?) on the team – he gets at least a bucket a game just by slicing across the lane for a catch ad a lay-up. Nice mix of quickness and size.
I wasn’t as enamored as most when the signing was made (not that I didn’t want Daniels here, just wasn’t as excited as some) – and if his play thus far continues, I’ll happily admit that I should have been more excited (eating my non-words, so to speak).
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree exactly with you Steve... 100 Percent!
by Mike-Dub on Nov 20, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And Adds length on D
He and Pierce could be an effective defensive wing duo. Ray could do the Reggie (Miller) off the bench. And long 2’s bother Ray.
by Tenacious D on Nov 20, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree at all with putting Marquis in the starting lineup...
He is a great bench player but you don’t want to mess with a starting line up that has gotten you 137 wins over the last 2 and a 5th seasons.
by Mike-Dub on Nov 20, 2009 11:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
his contributions does not show up in the stat sheet but those little things help win games
if we will be talking about stat sheets then all the starters have negative plus minus per minutes and all the bench players have positive plus minus per minutes! i say what?
by jeric on Nov 20, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't trust +/- numbers
if they were correct, then Doc should have cleared the bench for the final minute and we would have had a better chance of winning.
someone further down the post mentioned that Daniels plays a lot with Sheed and House who chuck the three. maybe that has to do with why i don’t see much in him, because he doesn’t get a chance to do much with Sheed throwing up contested bricks 6 seconds into the shot clock. I never thought of it in that way. when we play the bench, should Daniels be option 1 or 2 depending on which starter is in, and let Sheed and House be last shot clock beaters? because at the moment, it looks to be the other way around.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 11:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the frustration but
with Sheed throwing up contested bricks 6 seconds into the shot clock
The more frustrating thing is that actually, MOST of ‘Sheeds 3pt shots have been wide open and he’s still missing. I know that when they are wide open, Doc wants them to take the shot – but yikes.
At least ’Sheed really earned his money on the defensive side tonight. He was a rebounding machine.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't too that is why I like Marquis Daniels coz his contributions are not reflected in them
I just pointed that out in order to make a point (sarcastic point at that) lol
by jeric on Nov 20, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
disagreee
no offense but i strongly disagree with you on Daniels
he is one of the few c’s who are playing consistently well
by friedgreentomatoes on Nov 21, 2009 12:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
threes
everyone was missing but especially rasheed, he never makes a three. i also did not agree with doc on playing house, rondo had a very good first half, iand yeah that foul on pierce gift wrapped it. terrible call. another great game from daniells.
by gustusias on Nov 20, 2009 10:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
in the past 7 games
Sheed is 5 for 38 from behind the arc. that’s 13%! holy crap!
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and the whole team
is only 23%, going 26 for 112. Allen, though in a slight slump, is getting less shots from behind the arc Sheed, House, Pierce, and even Rondo in some games. The greatest shooter of all time is getting less looks than Rondo? what’s happening here?
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rondo had a very good half?
I just got home from the game, and the $55 million man belonged on the bench in the 4th quarter tonight. How many times did journeyman Jason Willliams drive by him tonight? Please. Rondo better get his head into the game soon.
by vinnie on Nov 20, 2009 11:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
we need to make a change
something is clearly off with this team right now. maybe it’s kg not being back to full strength,maybe it’s bad shooting from house and wallace, maybe it’s bad defense maybe it’s all of these things. we came out flat again at home in front of a national audience against a team that beat us in game 7 last year and we came out with no energy , no defense no nothing. How does that happen? Maybe it’s doc, maybe it’s how old we are. maybe its the lack of practice. whatever it is we don’t look like a championship team. certainly we can play a lot better but this was another bad loss at home to a team that we had every reason to beat. very disappointing
by Red2 on Nov 20, 2009 10:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
When Kg gets back to 100%
expect 07 KG.
This is why i believe Boston will win it all this year, KG and His D he gets others to play so well
Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...
by BS Patrol on Nov 20, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm really struck by how badly we are shooting
for most of the last 5 or 6 games.
Even from 3 feet – little turn and shoot fallaways that rim out are even more painful than the flat misses from 19 ft. In those last three minutes we had multiple layups that we missed that would have been huge if they had gone in!
This team seems to excel at creating open shots – and then missing them.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if rondo can't hit a jumper
then he’s not worth $3M let alone $11M
by Red2 on Nov 20, 2009 10:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
agree red2
3 and 4 in the last 7 games
by CELTICZ4LIFE on Nov 20, 2009 10:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It’s too early in the season for the Celtics to struggle like this. Doesn’t bode well for the long haul. This team is looking more old and ineffective every day. I can’t wait until May when KG is 34 and Ray is pushing 35…
by burnin' on Nov 20, 2009 10:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sheed went 0-7 from threes...
but imagine how many of those wide open looks from behind the arc he would have taken had Doc told him not to slow up on the threes. Also Ray Allen has to do something on the offensive end and not just be a player having no positive effect on the offensive end.
by Mike-Dub on Nov 20, 2009 10:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
he took every wide open three he got
the smart move after missing i dont the first 5 would be to pup fake step in and shoot a 15 ft. jumper.. but hey Im not complaining keep hoisting them up there Sheed.. Go Magic!
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Iverson isn’t going to solve our problems.
by burnin' on Nov 20, 2009 10:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
didn't take long
for the Rondo bashers to come out of the woodwork now that he’s signed his deal
a bad game or two doesn’t define a man
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Nov 20, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jeff you are exactly right...
I can’t believe so many of the comments in this post right now… PEOPLE ARE WAY OVERREACTING AND NEED TO CALM DOWN!… IT WAS THE 15 GAME OF THE SEASON!
by Mike-Dub on Nov 20, 2009 11:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry 13 games...
I can’t count haha.
by Mike-Dub on Nov 20, 2009 11:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
While I don't stand by any of the irrational and thoroughly absurd Rondo-bashing (i.e. "dump him"),
I think it worth noting that at least some contingent of those filing Rondo complaints found him semi-bash-worthy for the same things prior to the signing (missed FTs, shooting issues, sometimes-porous on-ball defense).
Of course, given some of the comments in this thread, I think your thought here is well-placed, Jeff – just wanted to add a qualifier.
And I’ll note that for as much of an unabashed Rondo fan as you are, I think you’ve been especially fair over the last few weeks in his regard.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
folks forget quickly
that Rondo’s play in the 3rd period is what beat the Warriors in the last game.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A bad game or two?
I would say it´s closer to a bad game or 8! Rondo earned to be bashed with his talk about the big 4 instead of the big 3! All the talk about being a top 5 PG(ok he probably did not do this himself), all the bs with Chri Paul, not being abl to make a FT etc. He did get his big contract and from there everything went south. If he is the future of the Boston Celtics I am really afraid of the future!
by KevinConnor on Nov 21, 2009 6:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We are in a horrible slump right now
THere is not much that can be done except change up your practice routine.
Boston Celtics - 2008 World Champions
by QuinielaBox on Nov 20, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
what i don't like is this is not a road game this is at home!
kinda redundant now but my stance on rondo’s contract is still that we should have waited it out until next year when he becomes a free agent, that way he has no choice but to play hard and prove to everyone that he is worthy of being a top 5 pg, it’s that hunger and a consistent drive to work on your game
by jeric on Nov 20, 2009 11:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If Ainge waited he would have risked losing him in FA
There will be alot of money available in ‘10 FA market. The loser’s of the LeBron and Wade sweepstakes would very much like Rondo as a consolation prize.
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if it means us getting the 18th title with rondo's hunger then i guess its a price we could pay
by jeric on Nov 21, 2009 12:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but then again it's moot and academic
but I just really want to see rondo succeed and dominate more in any means possible! isn’t that too much to ask?!!! lol
by jeric on Nov 21, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you dont know if he would be motivated by the contract or not
he could go the other way and stop caring because everyone else is getting paid and he’s not.. its all about personality and Ainge felt that giving Rondo his money would be in the best interest of the team
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 1:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
perk??
horrible night for mr.perkins
by CELTICZ4LIFE on Nov 20, 2009 11:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
perk got hosed
first by the really lousy blocking charge which should have been a charge on Lewis and then by the phantom push followed by the technical.
Those two completely neutralized him.
‘Sheed actually played really well in the post on defense in relief of Perkins though. (Just couldn’t shoot worth anything).
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hosed or otherwise,
five technicals in 13 games seems like a Perk problem more than a referee problem.
For my part, my eyes are far from flawless, but I thought he got a hand on Barnes’ back on the sideline, which makes me reluctant to criticize that call.
As always, there have been several mentions already (still reading down the rest of the comments below, so perhaps I’ll be proven wrong) of “phantom” calls going against the Celts and “gifts” to the Magic – but remarkably little (read: no) mention of any of the several calls that made the folks in blue quite agitated as well.
It was good, hard, physical basketball that went both ways – which meant there were calls and non-calls that upset folks on both sides. The Magic played better basketball. Or perhaps Jeff was more accurate in that they were slightly less bad in this war of attrition.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my point is only about the effect on Perk
fair calling of the game overall or not – those two calls took Perk out of the game.
And we can disagree about whether it really was a foul, but the fact that someone has a hand on someone’s shirt does not mean they are pushing them. The replays look like Perk barely was touching him.
At any rate – I totally agree that overall the ref calls are not what lost the game for the Celtics (though they didn’t help). Their lousy FG% did.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
and really, thanks for clarifying, m^5. I’d agree with everything you said there – and apologies then if it came off as though much of my frustration with ref-bashing came out headed in your direction. A lot of that was an across-the-board commentary (see some of my further thoughts below), but given your comments here, I probably could have held off in that particular spot.
Appreciate the follow-up.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Welcome to the world of Dwight Howard
DH gets calls like that every game. It has actually gotten worse this year than ever. Dwight cant be aggressive now that these BS calls are being made.
The announcers made a really good point in the game. Refs have no idea how to “ref” physical big men. Yes I will credit Perkins as one(even though he whines like a bitch) So the NBA is and always will be a scoring driven league. So its up to the bigs to play smarter and hope that the calls dont come in bunches
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thought that was an interesting point by JVG on ESPN tonight as well
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 12:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A really good defensive effort at least.
Holding the Magic to 83.
(trying to find positives ….)
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
How bout this for a positive... The Celtics played AWFUL... AWFUL... and still had an oppurtunity to win the game.
by Mike-Dub on Nov 20, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
true
up until KG missed the layup i was certain they were going to win it and I still thought they had a good chance until the phantom block call on Pierce. That ended the game.
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Up until that bald ref blew a call and gave the Magic two free throws to put away the game and kill our momentum.
by Justin_Bobo on Nov 20, 2009 11:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
to borrow/change a quote from Sheed
both teams played bad
both teams played bad
they just played less bad
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers" Henry V
by Jeff Clark on Nov 20, 2009 11:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
that's awesome
(the quote – not the game)
by mmmmm on Nov 20, 2009 11:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this team is showing age
plain and simple.
the big 3 are no longer dominant.
and rondo will have more of a burden as season goes on… boy we looked good for 6 games
by tommyfan on Nov 20, 2009 11:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I want to tell you to stop being Chicken Little...
…but unfortunately I think I agree with you. I’ve got a bad feeling.
by Black Bird on Nov 20, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here Here!!
Boston Celtics - 2008 World Champions
by QuinielaBox on Nov 20, 2009 11:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
age and energy!!!??
im sick of hearing that this early in the season- its something else.
start out looking unbeatable and now this??!!
it dosnt make sense..
by CELTICZ4LIFE on Nov 20, 2009 11:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
better now than later. but they stink now. perk played stupidly. rondo was looking for waldo. sheed can’t buy a 3 and is out of shape but he did hustle and made some plays. eddie tries but is in a woeful slump. scal really hustled on d. marquis is very good but the team has no plays set up for him and he’s on the floor when sheed and eddie barf up 3’s. pp,kg and ray ok but no hall of fame games. i can’t stand van gundy. orlando is not the better team but they executed better in the 1st and 3rd periods.
by nazzbo on Nov 20, 2009 11:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
hey we kept them under 90 points!
but then again we are kept under 80 so yeah
by jeric on Nov 20, 2009 11:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice to have Sheed aboard
As pleasant as he’s been in the post on defense, his absolute inability to hit open threes and his dreadfully slow pick and roll defense is murdering us. Someone want to tell me how a team with Ray Allen, Eddie House and Rasheed Wallace is so inept from three? That was embarrassing. Orlando gave us the game and we couldn’t capitalize. Iffy calls by the refs down the stretch too. WTF was that call on Pierce guarding Carter, then nothing on the other end when Pierce took it to the hoop? Seems like the Captain has to get decapitated to get a foul called these days. And that fifth foul on Perk was an absolute joke. It’s uncanny how a guy who locks down one of the NBA’s marquee “stars” (save it, Howard is a joke) just happens to get in irrevocable foul trouble in the third quarter. What a coincidence!
by joebianca on Nov 20, 2009 11:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
The conspiracy is on to have Orlando and not the more lucrative Boston franchise do better….
Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...
by BS Patrol on Nov 20, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The NBA doesn't give a crap about cities
It wants its stars to be in their best position to do well. Unfortunately Bigfornothing Howard couldn’t capitalize. But I digress. If ’Sheed could hit a three to save his life, this would be almost a moot point.
by joebianca on Nov 20, 2009 11:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's moot regardless,
because, as I suggested above, this is how basketball often works: The refs make some calls, don’t make other calls, and both teams get upset about the ones that don’t go their way. The constant carping about the officials kills me.
Credit Orlando for coming to town sans Nelson and pulling out a victory. And, yes, VC made a couple of huge plays down the stretch.
BS Patrol, I’ll try to get back to your VC comments above later in the evening – I’m conflicted on how I feel about his play tonight because a) it felt like he killed us down the stretch but b) his inefficiency and a couple of the TOs would have driven me crazy if I were a Magic fan.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, sorry
I refuse to believe that the ticky tack calls on Perk were coincidental. You can say what you want, but it’s too convenient. Sorry.
by joebianca on Nov 20, 2009 11:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think KU could have beaten the Celtics tonight
Celtics looked like the Tigers
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Nov 20, 2009 11:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh boy, Po
Also, got your PM – sorry about that, was traveling yesterday and had a busy last few days in the Midwest – been meaning to get back to the email…which I did get a good laugh out of, despite it’s less-than-complimentary nature toward MU. :—D
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, would you care to explain "save it, Howard is a joke"?
I guess there is something cool about taking an unsubstantiated ad hominem potshot at someone on an opposing team with an authoritative-sounding tone in a parenthetical reference…but I don’t get it all.
He is a poor FT shooter. His offensive post game needs a significant amount of refining. Yet he is still one of the game’s most dominant players simply through his raw athleticism and brute strength offensively and the fact that he is the league’s best defender at present. And he has progressed every year, which would lead me not to close the door on the FTs or at least the post game improving in the years to come.
What’s the utility of the shot at Howard?
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He's not a star
He can’t carry a team like Kobe or LeBron, but the NBA pushes him like he can. He rarely takes over a game like the true greats do. He’s too easily taken out of the game. I know it’s your shtick to come slobber over the opposing team under the guise of being ‘balanced’, but that doesn’t explain away the fact that Howard’s daddy was forced out of the game, and he still couldn’t do anything worthwhile. Maybe it’s just something with him and the Celtics, but he’s soft as Charmin most times I watch him.
by joebianca on Nov 20, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, I'm missing the "cool" part of the personal attacks
I mean, I guess that’s me: always busy slobbering over guys who do things like score, rebound and defend. Occasionally passers, too.
In your paragraph above, you named two players who are considered by general consensus (yes, that includes folks outside this site) as the two best active basketball players on the planet as better than Howard. And you took a gratuitous shot at me. Fine, perhaps he is one of the top three to eight (and that has to be conservative, right?) players in the game right now.
If that’s not a star, I don’t know what to tell you.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 20, 2009 11:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the Howard dig was kinda funny actually
But I admittedly think that Howard is one of the most overrated players in the league.
At the end of the day, hes just making a comment about an opposing player after watching a brutal game, I really don’t have a problem with it. Digs at other posters aren’t really necessary but we’re all here to talk basketball and attacks on players from other teams is to be expected.
I take shots at Kobe Bryant all the time, but I still recognize that he’s a top 2 player in the NBA.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The reigning DPOY is overrated... okay
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry to break it to you.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 12:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing holding Dwight Howard back right now is his FT shooting
When teams have to stop intentionally fouling Dwight then he can finally become the best player in the league. Until then, keep fouling away Boston. Its working
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, my only real beef with Howard’s game besides his predictable as hell low-post game and his bad FT shooting (as u mentioned) is his ability to rebound when he’s out of position. That’s just a testament to his athletic freakishness. It’s not a bad thing at all if you’re a Magic fan, it just drives me crazy watching him get boards when he’s boxed out.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One other thought on your original post here;
For as poor as this team has shot from deep very recently, the Celtics still entered tonight seventh in the league at 37 percent from deep. They shot way better than expected at the very beginning and then likely went even further than merely regressing to the mean for this particular group. All things considered, at 37 percent as a team, I’m not sold on this group as “inept” from three.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 12:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Steve
I know the overall numbers, and I respect the salient analysis, but I think the overall 3 numbers are skewed by blowouts we had early on. The bottom line is, in close games, when we’ve needed a clutch three, they (especially ‘Sheed) have not been able to get it done. I hope it’s just a hiccup, but it’s at the very least disconcerting.
by joebianca on Nov 21, 2009 1:13 AM EST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I follow your thought, and I agree that the last couple of weeks have been frustrating,
but I guess my question is, what makes those early-season blowouts necessarily any more of a “skew” of the numbers than the last couple of weeks? Either way, we’re talking about small sample sizes in the greater scheme. Just like the 27-2 start followed by 2-7 stretch last year, I think these guys aren’t as lights-out as they looked for the first couple of games, but they aren’t as putrid as they have been of late – and the percentage will be all right.
What has been more disconcerting to me since day one was just the proportion of the offense that relied on the three-pointer. But that’s mostly a separate question from “who are these guys as shooters overall?,” though I realize the better the answer to the latter, perhaps the more we’ll be willing to accept the former.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 1:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the Magic just moved their feet quicker
they were getting wide open threes and they had a hand in our face on most of our threes
it’s like our team can’t move their feet
the reason Rondo didn’t play the 4th (besides opening lanes for Pierce and Ray) is because the other team can just foul him and that’s going to kill his confidence (and we’d lose the game)
there’s something going on with the team; chemistry, demeanor, attitude, effort, confidence: all are missing
by KJR on Nov 20, 2009 11:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
accidents happen
if ray allen hadn’t lost that ball at the 4th quarter, i’m pretty sure the celtics would’ve taken orlando to OT
by kwong5 on Nov 20, 2009 11:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
man..........!!!!!!!!!
Seriously, I don’t think we were in this game tonight, shooting was terrible and we were sluggish. Man we need Rondo to pick up some more offense. Seriously this was a very sad game.
by sagala on Nov 20, 2009 11:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
about Pierce's not getting foul calls
getting foul calls going to the basket is all about speed, in my opinion
go in fast like LeBron and Kobe and with authority, and you’ll get the calls
it’s the aggression and the speed
if you lumber in slowly and then flail, even if you get fouled, you’re not going to get the call
it’s a quick human reaction on the part of the refs; if Paul gets his tempo up and goes in with more authority, he’ll get a lot more calls (like he did earlier in his career)
by KJR on Nov 20, 2009 11:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yes
i said that about Pierce last year as well. he leans and shuffles now to the hole and will decreasingly get those calls. Both and he Sheed look like they could be in better shape as well.
by lakersbluedevil on Nov 20, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no I wouldn't go that far
we can distinguish the game from the team
they played a bad game, and they’ve played a bunch of bad games
but this team still has the personnel to crush any other team if they get their act together
by KJR on Nov 20, 2009 11:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
how long before we admit its over?
We have joined the spurs in the toast department. Its over. Atlanta and Orlando are clearly two steps ahead of us. Its just a question now if Danny can do something via trades.
by chanter on Nov 21, 2009 2:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
nahhh :(
"Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing." - Vince Lombardi
by wild-a on Nov 20, 2009 11:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i dont wanna like this game again.
boston had a chance. but ray ray ray why he lose ball? i think sheed stop trying 3. Just stop if there is a problem. ok!. perk was stupid. house was disability.
no no no i dont wanna see orlanda’s smile face.
by Temuulen O on Nov 20, 2009 11:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Really Disappointed
This team is underacheiving big time. It can’t be age this early in the season. It can’t. D is not good. No energy. Too much outside shooting. Rondo gets abused on defense and he is making awful decisions. He really needs to work on his game. Stop trying to pad his assist stats and just try and make the right play. They had better get their heads on straight soon or this season is going to be a failure. Still scratching my head. No way a team with this talent should be playing like this.
by Lord18 on Nov 20, 2009 11:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Rondo needs to see the mismatch
and take advantage. Unfortunately, he only seems to want and play big when he’s against another great point guard and acts like he has something to prove. when he played deron, chris paul, rose, mo williams, he had stellar games. when he goes against scrubs, he doesn’t make much of an effort. he doesn’t motivate himself. i think if Rondo attacks Williams on offense, we easily win.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 20, 2009 11:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"D is not good." ??????
They held the Magic to 83 pts! That should be good enough for the win!
The problem is not the D. The problem isn’t even in the Offense – because the offense is getting them open shots. The problem is they (the players) can’t shoot right now. The whole team is shooting horribly. This is the Celtic’s equivalent of the Red Sox team-wide hitting slump that hit in the middle of the summer.
If even just a few handful of those shots that rimmed out fall in – they win.
Law of averages says that their FG% should swing back up, right? So good times are ahead?
by mmmmm on Nov 21, 2009 12:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
The team is just in a slump. They’ll be fine.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 12:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like your attitude!
I’m going to keep believing that until someone else is raising a banner, and even then I’ll probably still question it.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Its clear to me that, pp and ray are missing a step. And im thinking its age. Pp looks like its hard for him to score, ray allen just looks off. Pp shld be mentioned with lbj carmelo, kobe etc but as of now he looks flat out bad he shld be taking over games scoring at will. I knw everybody has bad games but something looks off
by kelly811 on Nov 20, 2009 11:24 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Maybe things will get better as the season goes on, maybe its better to struggled now this early. But in 15 games its only been 4-5 games where the Cs looked good win or loss…time will tell if it gets better for them
by kelly811 on Nov 20, 2009 11:30 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
and as far as the starting lineup goes
the problem is not Ray
the guys that are breaking down on D in the 1st Q are Rondo and Pierce
after five good games to start the season, Pierce has been outplayed by almost every counterpart in the past 8 games; Pietrus, Maggette, Carter, Ryan Gomes, Granger; he’s making everyone look like the go-to guy on the other team
I think he’s sulking about something, but I can’t figure out what
maybe he doesn’t like that the team is so deep and he feels his role is too diminished, I don’t know; he seems to get along with Daniels, but not with anyone else
the team also doesn’t look like it’s having any fun, and they aren’t coming out with swagger
by KJR on Nov 20, 2009 11:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
As bad as Sheed was from three...
I actually really liked his aggressiveness around the hoop in the 4th. He made several inside shots that really kept us in the game. He hasn’t really done any of that at all this season, so it was refreshing to see that he still has that part of his game.
I also can’t believe all the complaints on Rondo. Look, it’s not his fault that the team can’t shoot from the outside. If they were even ‘below average’ from three, they would have won. He wasn’t great, but nobody was.
by jambr380 on Nov 20, 2009 11:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Anyone know when the last time the C's lost 3 straight Friday home games?
Seriously, it must be a while because you don’t even usually get 3 straight Friday home games scheduled let alone be an allegedly title contending team and LOSE 3 in a row. Man, I’m PO’d right now.
by cgargiul on Nov 20, 2009 11:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And Orlando did not have their stellar starting point guard
Interesting that Orlando had to play with Jayson Williams as their point guard and still won the game. Of course, it didn’t hurt that he had Ole Rondo playing defense on him.
by vinnie on Nov 20, 2009 11:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
exactly, Rondo didn't attack
Rondo only seems to want to play his best when he’s against other great guards. I think if Nelson had played tonight, we would have won, because then Rondo would have motivated himself to play better.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i guess you havent figured it out yet
Rondo doesnt play well against us because we have Dwight Howard.. thats it. Dwight is the best shot blocker in the league and all of Rondo’s points come from layups and short jumpers.
The opposing PG just needs to sag on Rondo and funnel him to Dwight. If Dwight doesnt block it he at least changes the shot
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Lakers do the same thing
LA plays Rondo the same way: they put Kobe on him and Kobe basically just ignores Rondo and roams all over the place, trusting that when Rondo drives, Bynum and Gasol will be there to meet him at the rim.
by WildYams on Nov 21, 2009 7:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
New Game Plan
it doesn’t look like the team can play Thibodeau’s D for 48 minutes; or at least they can’t do it most nights during the regular season
so they’re playing bad D, and it’s killing them on offense also because they’re tired and moving slowly (or not moving at all without the ball)
maybe they should try selectively playing a zone for parts of each game; that might keep them fresh; then they can really clamp down on D and get a serious run going; it will also save their legs for their offense
I don’t know. Maybe this is a dumb idea. But right now, they don’t look like they can bring the full defensive intensity every night for a full game. If you’re doing a lot of rotating and you’re late, the other team is always dunking and getting wide open threes. It’s not like the D is 75% effective with 75% effort. It’s like it’s 25% effective with 75% effort, which is worse than it would be with a regular defensive scheme.
Maybe if they throw a zone in for a few minutes of the 1st and 3rd, it will get their heads in the game, and keep their legs fresh.
by KJR on Nov 20, 2009 11:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
again, will folks get off the D?
The D was not the problem. The inability to put the ball in the basket was.
If you hold a team like Orlando to 83 pts then you are supposed to win.
by mmmmm on Nov 21, 2009 12:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Tired and moving slow.... man it sounds like your team is old
oh wait it is
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 12:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Orlando’s average age is 28.1, Boston’s is 27.9
Just sayin
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 12:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do the starting lineups big guy
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i see u
just playin devils advocate
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 1:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't checked this - so maybe you'll find that it lines up as parallel
but I wonder if using weighted age (accounting for minutes distribution rather than just the mean age of the roster) would reflect the issue a bit differently. I think it’s a somewhat fairer measure for this sort of thing – that said, if I get a chance when I’m not half asleep and liable to screw up much of the data, I’ll try to look into this a bit later. Just a thought on that, Mike.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s an interesting theory because guys like Garnett, Howard, and Lewis who came straight out of college conceivably will be older players than their age suggests. Probably not so much for Perk because his role early on was never as big as it currently is. If you ever do crunch some numbers, by all means, let us know.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 1:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course
Also, to clarify, while what you’re saying is of intrigue as well, what I’m referring to is the idea of weighting for the distribution of minutes on a given team when comparing team ages, i.e. if Sam Cassell spent another year on the Celtics’ 15-man roster, would it really be an accurate depiction of this team’s age to be counting him for just as much (1/15th) as KG, Rondo, Pierce at al. do?
Weighted age involving counting the ages of players more or less heavily due to the proportion of total team minutes they spend on the court.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 1:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ahhh
Very good point. In that case, our team is friggin’ ancient.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 1:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here we go:
This all comes with the lame disclaimer that it’s getting late, and my brain is fried, which means I wouldn’t be stunned if I somehow botched the calculation:
But with that said, using the method I suggested above for weighted age (factoring in the percentage of total team minutes played by each player), the Magic check in at 27.07, and the Celts at 29.76. That tells a different story than just the raw mean age does (when calculated correctly, anyway).
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 1:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A 20 year-old and a 36-year-old don´t equal two 28-year-old.
by Casperian on Nov 21, 2009 2:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, this isn't good
I’m not pushing a panic button, but if you don’t see cause for serious concern, then those glasses are quite rosy. On that note, I’ll make some assumptions:
- Yes, I think the new contract has gone to Rondo’s head. It’s the only reason I can imagine that suggests he’s falling back on old habits and maybe be overconfident. (Ask Tubby.) But it is something that can sort itself out. But he needs to be the one to do it.
- Perk, God love him, needs to be smarter. He’s regressed — not as a defensive talent per se, but as a freakin’ hothead. I’m tired of his perennial scowl if it means constant whining and constant techs. You can be aggressive and smart and a professional. He’s shown it before. So shut up and play already.
- I have a bad feeling you kind of live and die with Rasheed being Rasheed. I just wish he wouldn’t jack those threes so reflexively. And I believe some of those shots were wide open cuz they might be letting him. But whatever. Jury’s out on him in my book.
- I actually do think we should keep an open mind on bringing in Iverson. Yes, he’s potential locker room poison, but he also could light a fire on both the second unit AND Rondo, who could use the competition. And then there’s that outside shot. It’s a crazy idea, but maybe we need one right now.
by Big_Easy on Nov 20, 2009 11:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i agree on 75% of your notes
the last one got me nauseated the moment I saw the word “Iverson” and I couldn’t read further
by jeric on Nov 21, 2009 12:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Iverson
The only way Iverson would work is if Ray or Rondo agreed to come off the bench for him, because Iverson has made it abundantly clear that the only thing he cares about is being a starter. It’s also a good bet that if he was a starter, he’d also want to be taking 20+ shots a game, and would want to be playing 35 or so minutes per game. How can the Celtics do that without basically benching Ray or Rondo? Iverson is not the solution.
by WildYams on Nov 21, 2009 7:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh my god ..
man sheed really stunk up the gaaden tonight he kept shooting those threes and were bricks how can doc keep letting shoot i,ll tell you right now this team does not look right something is missing they are not the best team in the east the last week the bottom line is this team does not scare the hawks , or the magic and the cavs don,t backdown neither and that could mean trouble down the road …
by lohaus#54 on Nov 20, 2009 11:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jalen Rose: “Boston looks old and sluggish no athleticism”….i have to agree with him, Boston might be done for the season.
by kelly811 on Nov 21, 2009 12:02 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
A little premature, nu?
Sluggish at times, sure. And frustration with the last two weeks or so seems reasonable to me. But I think the doom-and-gloom talk still comes quite a bit early in the season’s first month.
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 12:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
those are the kind of statements that piss me off
we lose a game and all of a sudden we’re done for the season. forget the fact that we still have 69 games to play! we lose a game by 5 points to another title contender, and yet we’re done. hang up the sneakers and book the vacation house for May. no need to worry about the rest of the season.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But here is the thing
The Celtics have beaten ONE good team this year — ONE. Granted, the season is young, but they have not gotten it done against the iron.
by vinnie on Nov 21, 2009 12:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not say there aren't any problems
obviously, there are. there’s always room for improvement. but don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. one game does not make the season.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Some bullet points:
Doc tells Sheed to take fewer 3’s and the very next game he goes 0-8. With that said, most of them were good, open shots.
THAT’S WHAT HE’S HERE FOR, THEY’LL START DROPPING -
Sheed seemed to do all the other little things right. It was that kind of night.
Perkins picking up two quick fouls in the 3rd were big but Howard never really took advantage.
THE CELTICS WILL BE RIGHT THERE AT THE END OF THE YEAR – THIS IS A STUMBLING BLOCK ONLY
Rondo sat for most of the 4th quarter. Was Doc sending a message or did he just want Eddie’s shooting on the floor?
UM, NO – HE’S SENDING A CLEAR MESSAGE
I really like the little things that Marquis Daniels does on the floor. He won’t fill up a stat sheet, but he helps you win games. That is when you aren’t doing everything else to lose them.
THIS YEAR’S JAMES POSEY -
KG seemed to tweak his knee early in the 4th but he looked alright after that.
LET’S JUST NOT TALK ABOUT THIS ONE – HE’S FINE – KNOCKING ON WOOD
Kept waiting for someone like Pierce or Ray or Rondo to take over the game and nobody did.
MINOR – THEY’LL GET IT TOGETHER FOR THE NEXT GAME -
I really don’t like Vince Carter. Almost goes without saying, but I’m going to keep saying it.
RIGHT THERE WITH YOU
We really need a more consistent effort on defense. The offense will come and go, no big deal, but if we make stops more often, we win going away.
RIGHT -
NOW…WHEN IS ALLEN IVERSON COMING?
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk
by mcpu40 on Nov 21, 2009 12:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I really hope that Iverson comment is a joke
and I know that’s what Sheed’s here for, and I like the optimism, but 5-38 in the past seven games. I’m fine with him taking the shot when it’s a good shot, but he likes to take them with a hand in his face and way early in the shot clock. it just ain’t working!
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it's not even funny for a joke
iverson is a joke! he is hell of a player when he was playing in philly but somehow his skill set has peaked and waned but his ego is just forever on the rise
by jeric on Nov 21, 2009 12:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If he would accept a role off the bench and play his game when the opportunity presents itself, he could be very useful on this team. The problem is, he still sees himself as a top 15-20 player in this league. Despite what he thinks, he just isn’t as capable as he once was. It’s too bad because he’s blowing potential opportunities with his attitude.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 12:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A.I.
I would love to see Iverson bring the ball up the court here in Boston! Why not,we have Rondo and then what?He just got paid BIG CHEDDAR and Iverson can come cheap and he can HELP Rondo learn what it’s like to have a whole City on your back watching your every move now he recieved his contract don’t you think that bring MAD PRESSURE and A.I. would be the release valve Go for it! I bet he would have more the Half the 3’s R.W has with Half the shoots taken!FACT, one of the best 3 shooters in the game ! He would lite up the Garden yea I still call it the GARDEN,
The Rudster Knows!
by rudster on Nov 21, 2009 10:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my bad
@ky and sw my bad tht was very negative on my part im usually positive but looking at the way they played ( even against below average teams) this season it doesnt look good. I guess im looking at like its early but they look like they just played theyre 75th game…i hope things get better again my bad
by kelly811 on Nov 21, 2009 12:21 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
pathetic coaching
hard to imagine a coach not realizing that you need a top ballhandler in a game, esp. i the 4th quarter and esp against a team like orlando. the key loss of the ball by allen and other bumbling about by house was quite predictable, with the coaches keeping the super-talented rondo on the bench at crunch time. rivers and company need to rediscover what is really necessary at the end of games — certainly not more 3 point shooters with limited talent out there.
by kelley on Nov 21, 2009 12:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
There were also some moments in the game when Doc absolutely should have taken a timeout but he let the margin get a little bigger first.
P2 is the man.
by MikeMartin on Nov 21, 2009 12:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A message needs to be sent to Rondo
Doc tried to do that tonight. Let’s see if it got through.
by vinnie on Nov 21, 2009 12:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And what kind of message would that be?
That you shouldn’t try to work out your problems so that you can learn and be good to go come the playoffs?
by Pengaloo on Nov 21, 2009 12:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
EVEN IF WE WON 2NIGHT..
there would still be major problems here.
lets say we came thru with the win in the end 2night – would every feel ok about the current state of things with this team- ???
by CELTICZ4LIFE on Nov 21, 2009 12:24 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
good point
perhaps we needed to get blown out. that way the players and the coaching staff would have to take a step back and reevaluate. but with only a five point loss, they might say that they did the right stuff, just need to play harder. which I don’t think will fix the problem.
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
$55 million for a point who hardly plays in the 4th quarter
But it sure emphasizes the problem the team will continue to have as long as opponents do not guard Rondo. The was the game has been changed, you really cannot afford to have more than one non-shooter on the floor. And why is Eddie House playing point when Daniels was brought in to handle the ball so House could spot up?
by lemonade sky on Nov 21, 2009 12:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It has now reached the point where...
A “fired-up” Celtic team cannot win at home…against an opponent that shoots a dismal 41% from the floor and 57% from the FT line!!!!!
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 12:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Championship "Window" has officially been closed
KG : He`s a shell of what he was, and it will only get worse
RONDO : Boston has serious “buyer`s remorse” right about now
WALLACE : The “Titantic” of free agent signings
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 12:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm seriously about to blow my top right now
but I know that my comment would just get deleted for foul language, as many of them do. so I’m instead just going to take a step back and calm down. 1…2…3…
by KY Celts fan on Nov 21, 2009 12:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gonna take an age old rule from the interwebz...
Don’t feed the trolls… â—• â—¡ â—•
by Hokkun on Nov 21, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I`m no troll...In fact, this kills me to even think these thoughts!
I`ve worshipped the Celts longer than you`ve probably been alive.
But, I know a title contender when I see one, and this Celtic team is not a contender.
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 12:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ok, this has all just degenerated into stupidity now
time to go to bed, folks.
Gawd I hope the Patriots crush the Jets big ….
by mmmmm on Nov 21, 2009 12:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Doc is about to blow a gasket!
When it finally happens, and it won`t be long from now…Sheed and Rondo will be the top two targets of his rage.
Unfortunately, it will likely “torpedo” the entire season!
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 12:42 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Iverson
Hey Jeric, I get that comment a lot from my wife! LOL.
I know the Iverson subject is explosive, and I’m not saying full-on bring him in. But it’s worth considering. I think he’s a frontrunner, which could actually be a plus for us. Sure he’d be a pain in the ass for most teams, but for a contender? Maybe not. It seems to me the Celtics have become the team players come to so they can win a title. To paraphrase “Cool Hand Luke,” if he got his mind right …
But I know as well as anyone it’s a risky move. If Danny thinks/knows it wouldn’t work, I’d respect his judgment. (How nice of me.) Presently constituted, maybe all this team needs is a spark, a change of attitude, or maybe a healthier KG knee. I don’t know, but we are in trouble. Maybe not “panic” trouble, but we’re in trouble.
by Big_Easy on Nov 21, 2009 12:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
the key here is "if he got his mind right"
personally I wonder when was the time he got his “mind” right? lol I’m not questioning his skills since he is hell of a player (philly days) but it’s his ego and his “mind” that keeps on getting the way of his really succeeding, and im all for team oriented basketball not for 1 on 5 games, looks good on highlights reel but you can’t keep that up for 82 games plus the post season. And yes the Ivererson subject is really explosive.
by jeric on Nov 21, 2009 12:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like how some of you forgot
That championships aren’t determined in November. It’s not even Thanksgiving Break yet. You do realize that, right?
The bottom line is, the Magic didn’t even score 85 points on us. Also, we missed so many wide open shots it wasn’t even funny. Pierce also didn’t finish lay ups after he beat his guy off a pick. I can only hope that can change.
All this horrid play on the offensive side, we only lose by 5, and somehow we’re done?
Sorry, it doesn’t work like that. Not 13 games in.
by Tai on Nov 21, 2009 12:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
You mean we should use some of the remaining regular season 69 games (and maybe even some of the playoffs, too?) before closing the book on assessing this team?
Seems a little far-fetched, Tai.
:-D
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 12:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Take your rime, sw.
We all have a our own pace at realizing things.
by Casperian on Nov 21, 2009 1:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And mine is often, waaaay behind the curve
Always a slow runner, occasionally lacking common sense, too. :-D
-sw
Growing up in the Weinman household, you learn two rules very quickly if you aspire to reach double-digits in the years-of-age category: Hate thy Knick, hate thy Yankee.
Go Celtics, Go Dodgers. -sw
by Steve Weinman on Nov 21, 2009 1:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sick and tired
First thing .its been happening forever but I’m sick of it paul pierce gets treated like a second rate rookie when it comes to calls in the past three games I have seen atlanta indiana and orlando blatantly foul paul 5 or more times on shot attempts no whistle then on the other end let paul breathe on vince,joe johnson,or granger he’s gettin popped kobe don’t get that lebron don’t get that melo don’t wade don’t hell kevin durant don’t its B.S. I’m sick of it ..secondly fire doc rivers hire byron scott ..Third rondo should have been out there eddie can’t run the offense paul couldn’t even get his iso at the top of the key guys were runnin into eachother and doc was tryin to prove some type of point no clue what rondo played a major role in our championship and was the reason we beat the bulls and even maintained against the magic along with baby and doc had a problem then its a pg thing doc wants rondo to be doc but he can’t he’s better than doc ever was and point guards can’t coach point guards check your history of pg coaches with great pgs never good just look how good porter was with nash or avery johnson with harris etc etc
by reggie_35 on Nov 21, 2009 12:54 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Please man you are sounding mighty pathetic... now you are acknowledging the referee bias and wanting to to go more in your favor
maybe if PP fails a litter harder the calls will come
I probably know Judo! How many of you can make the same boast?
by Souwantmyname on Nov 21, 2009 1:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i have not seen Pierce "explode" to the rim once
he will not get those calls unless he his moves are quicker and more creative. shuffling and leaning into people is not going to cut it
by lakersbluedevil on Nov 21, 2009 8:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't buy the "It's November" argument because...
We won the title partly because we had the homecourt advantage throughout the playoffs. So when you realize how balanced our competition is, how EVERYONE upgraded — Orlando, which will improve/when Nelson returns, Cleveland and L.A. — then every win does indeed count. So maybe we do “panic.” (I call it trying to stay ahead of the curve.) We might not have enough time to waste. Maybe we do improve, but how much and after how many losses. Just saying, I’m wondering if we can beat Cavs or Magic WITHOUT the homecourt advantage, especially given David Stern’s ways.
OK, I’m done for the night. Fire away.
by Big_Easy on Nov 21, 2009 1:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No I want paul to get called like any other star in the league hell just called period for real and if you are calling me pathetic bcuz your a magic fan I don’t think we lossed bcuz of the lack of calls to paul its just a point I think is disrespect to a star who doesn’t get any in the first place secondly I aint worried bout the magic your coach is a joke and you live and DIE with the three see you in the playoffs not worried bout you trust me at all vince never ever ever shows up in the playoffs and your center is in foul trouble too much plus your orlando who the hell cares about orlando florida maybe the people who live there mickey snow white and them
by reggie_35 on Nov 21, 2009 1:19 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Vince is 25ppg in playoffs.
If I am not mistaken…
Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...
by BS Patrol on Nov 21, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's Rondo
The refs were terrible, yes. But the Cs didn’t earn this win. Refs may have secured their loss, but it was a close game only because the Magic were almost as bad as the Cs were.
Bottom line is Rondo. He was literally standing around much of the time on D, and even on O. Standing and watching PP try to do his thing. No point guard means no coherent offense. It means everybody was just "making up stuff " out there on both O and D.
At one point in the 2nd half, it occurred to me that Rondo was behaving like he’s sick. Maybe he is. That would explain his worst game of the year to date.
Here’s a blanket statement for ya: This team cannot win without a functioning PG. I like Lester and think he should get his shot now. Kid’s got game, and could bust out like so many other rookies all over the league. But whoever it is… it can’t be nobody.
by DRJ1 on Nov 21, 2009 1:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
everybody
can eat it, we’re gonna win the title(again)
by Pumpupthejam on Nov 21, 2009 7:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
When Rondo and House are struggling like they were last night … I’d like to see Doc Rivers use Marquis Daniels at the point. Go with a big perimeter lineup.
Daniels with his size, athleticism and guard-skills gives the team a different dimension at the point.
by Who on Nov 21, 2009 9:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Learning How To Make The Right Rotations
We have the talent,we have the ability to win every game we play,we have a great D and great Offense, The 3"s ARE’nt Working so back off for awhile and drive the lanes and bang the boards, u might say I’m nuts but Big Baby comin back will change the chemistry drastically, he brings emoition into the game and players play diffrent with diffrent players and I believe we still have’nt found the mix as of yet.One player can alter awhole unit very easily! Thats what we have to look at and go easy on the 3’s, there not dropping so lets drive the lane and see what happens so then we can say it was’nt or it was the 3;s hurting us,we have time and we will find our Posey and House combo,players act to re-act and that creates reaction! So lets play our game and Bang the boards and grab rebounds, I have’nt seen to many fellas hit the floor diving for those lose balls like the year we took it all have we?? Lets man up and get going we are the team to beat and all teams we play come with the A game for 4 quarters! and we have to do the same,no turning it on then off then on, we need to keep it ON!
The Rudster Knows!
by rudster on Nov 21, 2009 10:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs






















