What's Wrong With The Celtics?
While it is still too early to panic, there is also plenty of time to worry. There are plenty of reasons to worry as well. I'm not even talking about the normal age and tired legs issues either. This is beyond that. These are issues that can and should be worked on soon. Lets right to the list, shall we?
Defense:
This is a really odd item to put in a list of Celtics weaknesses, (especially when we are near the top of the league in points allowed and point differential) but hear me out. This team still locks down teams for stretches of games, but there have been far too many stretches where the defense disappears or looks disinterested. I know that teams make runs but the Celtics of the larger part of the last two years never let those runs last that long. The lack of consistency is what is killing this team right now.
Consistency is absolutely mandatory for a defensive team. Guys have to know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that help defense is going to be in the right spot. If they don't know that, they may gamble or hedge or make bad decisions trying to compensate for the fact that the other guys won't be there to stop their man. Which sometimes works but usually gives up easy baskets.
Frankly I care little about the offense. If the defense is consistent, we would win these types of games.
Ball Movement/Shot Selection:
With that said, the offense isn't totally off the hook. First of all, lets get this out of the way right now. Maybe Sheed is taking too many 3's, but we all should have known that coming into this and the Celtics certainly did when they signed him to a 3 year deal. Screaming at the TV for Sheed to get in the paint is only going to get you a prescription for tea and honey. He's not changing his spots. I'm also not going to kill him for the 3's that he took against the Magic. They were good, open shots for the most part. Over the course of the season, he's going to make his fair share and there will be a time when he'll win a game or two with those types of shots.
With all that said, I'd like to see those shots set up by penetration a little bit more. Rondo is the master at this and when he's off his game it really throws a wrench in the works. It doesn't have to be him though. When Pierce is attacking the basket, he forces the defense to collapse on him, opening up kickouts to Ray, Eddie, and yes Sheed. When we've got Eddie or Paul holding the ball at the top of the key and waiting, waiting, watching Ray run through screens, holding off the defender with a forearm, feet planted, with a confused look, ...well, that's not good ball movement.
Perk is the closest thing we have to a traditional low post threat, so other than feeding KG and Sheed on the block for fallaway jumpers, we have to drive to collapse the defense. Once that happens, then you can bomb away and make them pay.
Rebounding:
The Celtics are dead last in rebounds so far this year. This puzzles me. Theres no reason why Perkins shouldn't be pulling down his fair share of rebounds. KG has been otherworldly dominant in the past on the boards. Both are at just over 7 boards a game. You don't really think of your point guard much when talking about rebounds, but Rondo has been huge on the glass in recent years and his numbers are down this year. Shelden has been the one bright spot but his contributions have been limited and might be limited even more when Big Baby returns (and Baby has never been a great rebounder despite his girth).
The Good News:
I'm sure there are some more reasons to worry, but there are also a few silver linings here. This is still the same group of guys that beat the Cavs and rolled out to a 6-0 start. They can put it together and there's a better than good chance that in time they will. Also, the majority of issues listed above can be fixed with a little bit of coaching and extra effort. You can't turn back the clock on the age of the vets, but you can help them see the game a little better and motivate the whole team to give a consistent effort night in and night out. I'd rather go through these struggles now and fix them as the season progresses than to fall apart at the end, but the key is to fix them before they become habit.
So there's time enough to get better, but I'd like to see it start happening sooner rather than later.
0 recs |
57 comments
|
Comments
I got some questions and comments for the rondo haters.
To those who are not a fan of Rajon, he is at best the 4th best player
on the team, so why when we lose, you all come out of the woodwork
and make it all about him, some even say “trade rondo” after his
worst game of the season so far.
these are people who clearly already have it out for rajon, and dont
appreciate and respect the things he brings to the ballclub.
Last night he did NOT play a good game – im not here to convince
anybody differently – but still, for the rondo criticzers
didnt they get what they wanted last night? “the big 3”
on the floor with 2 other shooters and the floor spread
no rondo to gamble off of? what happened? did you get the
results you were looking for? probably not considering
“the big 3” couldnt run a competent offensive set, knockdown a shot
or even attempt a shot towards the end of the game, not to mention
ray allen and pierces pathetic attempts at defending vince carter
or kevin garnetts inability to score on rashard lewis in the post
all this game proved to me was what i already knew, the celtics go
as rondo goes, if hes not playing well, the celtics will more often
then not lose- and the fans will wants rondos head on a choppin block
and make fun of him for not being a good shooter
completly ignoring the completly mediocre play from the “big 3”
the lack of intensity, urgency, motivation, and chemitry
from the entire team, the terrible 3 pt shooting and selection
and the fact that doc rivers made the coaching move (a bad one in
hindsight) to go with the “spread the floor” unit at the end of
the game for the big 3…we all saw what that got us, and thats
another loss
by takeit on Nov 21, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rondo is the biggest problem
I’m not judging his $11 million deal on one game, but the game IS one valid piece of evidence, among others. If we just had a normal, average NBA-quality PG who can HIT A FRIGGIN SHOT, we win last night’s game easily.
Just someone like Steve Blake ($5 MM per) or Will Bynum ($825 K per), and we win. Easily. Will Rondo ever grow up and become consistent? Will he ever acquire a shot (even a shot from one specific spot, like Bowen)? That will determine whether his new contract is or is not a huge albatross that makes Skippy’s MLE max deal pale into insignificance.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Nov 21, 2009 10:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Last I checked Doc went with 2 shooters and the big 3 at the end of the game and the celtics lost
so much for that theory
by takeit on Nov 21, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They went with 2 shooters and the big 3........
Because Rondo was not getting it done on either end of the court. That’s the issue. Doc does not want to go to that lineup, but when you continuously are playing 4 on 5 at both ends of the court, then Doc has to make a move on Rondo. The guy needs to bring it on a more regular basis. His total lack of consistency is a team killer.
by vinnie on Nov 21, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So when Rondo’s playing it’s his fault if the Cs loose. And when Rondo’s not playing it’s his fault if the Cs loose too. Yeah right.
by dexter11 on Nov 21, 2009 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Put it in Ripley's
With the season 15% over Brian Scalabrine is on pace for perfection. After 46 minutes on the hardwood, the 6-9 multi-talented redhead is on pace for ZERO rebounds. The winner of the Walter (“I never saw a rebound I wanted or liked” ) McCarty trophy for rebounding incompetence for the 2009-2010 season has for all practical purposes already been decided.
by Celtsfansince55 on Nov 21, 2009 4:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I've said it before and I'll say it again:
Sherwin gets more rebounds in a game than Air Intangibles does in a month. Literally!
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Nov 21, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not gonna watch anymore Celtics games til the playoffs… The games just sadden me.
by ziggen on Nov 21, 2009 5:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Post offense
IMO if there’s gonna be one thing that’s gonna down the Celtics this year (other than injuries), it’s probably gonna be the lack of a reliable post scorer. Sure, Perkins has some ability down there, but I don’t really see the Celtics running the offense through him. KG has had a little of that in the past, though it’s mainly on turnaround fadeaways, but it’s still unclear how much like “the old KG” he’ll get back to being this year. And Sheed… well, Sheed could have been one of the most devastating players ever out of the low block for his whole career, he just never showed much interest in playing from there, and like you said, he’s not gonna change his spots now. Pierce and Ray can slash to the hole and can drive and kick, but neither one is really a back to the basket scorer either. And Rondo is certainly not that kind of player.
Post play is one of the main keys to championship basketball, and luckily for the Celtics, they have one of, if not the best post defenses in the league. It’s why Dwight Howard only attempted 4 shots tonight. But sooner or later, a team in the postseason is gonna be able to wear the Celtics down by pounding it down low without having to worry that Boston will do the same to them. The Cavs have Shaq (though his ultimate effectiveness remains to be seen), the Magic have Howard and Gortat. Hell even the Hawks have Horford and Pachulia. And out West the Lakers have their seven footers, the Spurs have Duncan and McDyess, and even Denver’s got some post offense in Nene and Melo (and occasionally K-Mart).
Boston’s gotta play inside-out more to get their shooters going; and while the KG/Sheed frontcourt combo at the same time does pose matchup problems for opposing centers when they get pulled away from the basket, at some point it’s flawed offense to have the entire team setting up around the perimeter. Somebody has to set up down low and be a reliable enough threat to keep defenses honest.
by WildYams on Nov 21, 2009 5:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jeff, I understand your views, but right now I’m staring at the panic button without blinking. In the championship season, we were practically undefeatable at home. It was almost a guaranteed win. And we started the season with what, 17 straight wins or so? Now we’re 9-4, a good start, but I’m not so sure we’ll make it to the Finals with this kind of play.
I’m hoping that once Davis is back, there will be a renewed energy. Trading Scal, TAllen, and Giddens for some fresh and competent legs would be nice as well.
I’m starting to think that there will have to be some major changes in the 2010-2011 team, if we’re to have another go at a championship in the near future.
by braz on Nov 21, 2009 6:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Too early to panic
You have to realize that this Celtics team is an older team, and as such shouldn’t be expected to race off like they did two years ago (or even last year). Look at how the Spurs have always tended to start slow and then round into form. Teams that have won championships before know that it’s a marathon, not a sprint, and that titles are won in June not November. I do think the team needs a post scorer (as I wrote above), and something may need to be done about that, but it’s not like the Celtics are out of it or anything.
by WildYams on Nov 21, 2009 6:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cs have lost their Mojo
But they’ll get it back Then the 3s will drop. They do need more low post play and an agressive penetrating Rondo. Their D looked pretty good to me…keeping the magic to under 90. Main problem is offense now and it will come. But Rondo needs to play like a junkyard dog all the time. He’s so fast and has such vision … Just needs to play like 3rd quarter against golden state. Also gotta give magic D some credit… They blocked up the center and defended the perimeter…they played Cs type D. Also, as much as I hate the Yankees, recall that they sucked for the 1st third of the season and after the all-star break found their mojo and were unbeatable. Let’s hope the Cs soon realize how great they really are and stop all this lack of confidence foolishness.
by Daveonthecape on Nov 21, 2009 6:51 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Swing the Ball!
Anyone else note how, down the stretch, Pierce and Rondo were initiating tie O back from 1/2 court line? And Orlo was swarming the ballhandler. Youd think coaching would pick up on that, because a few quick passes should expose an over-extended defense. But they didnt—are they relying too much on dribble penetration get things going? Orlo didnt—except for some VC isos at the end. They were swinging the ball and getting plenty of looks.
by Tenacious D on Nov 21, 2009 7:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Its Obvious
Instead of looking for alternate reasons, I think you nailed the problem in your first paragraph. This team is old. There is very little athleticism. They really rely way way too much on jump shots and when these jump shots are not falling you wind up with days like last night.
With that being said, the playoffs are a different animal. The games slow down. The play becomes more physical. This team is built for the playoffs not for the quicker, faster paced regular season. We wont 65 games again this year but we will win our 50-53 and be one of the favorites to win the Eastern Conference.
Mo, you can trade anything of mine.
by njnick on Nov 21, 2009 8:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I saw several glaring weaknesses last night:
(1) The shot selection was God-awful. While Rasheed’s looks were wide open, there is a poor understanding of tempo with this team. Getting fairly open threes early in the shot clock in a grind it out game like last night is S-T-U-P-I-D. I was pretty riled watching how well the Magic moved during there sets to get open shots while the Cs settled for jumper after jumper after jumper… typically after blowing the first 10 seconds of the shot clock with the ball in one players hands.
(2) What the hell is ROndo playing for perimeter defense? You cannot be lazy with the perimeter players for Orlando (how is Jason WIlliams getting so many drives into the lane) without expecting to be hurt by kick out 3s and dump offs to Howard.
and (3) Right now, too many players have forgotten their roles, and DOc needs to lay down he law.
Rondo > distribute and stop ball penetration
House > you’re an off the pass shooter, not off the dribble
Wallace > you can’t be effective working that far from the hoop
KG > ditto… get your back to the basket a bit more
Allen > in pressure situations, please shoot and don’t dribble
I have to say that I love Perk and hope the team will listen to the big guy. He knows his role.
by vwoodruff on Nov 21, 2009 8:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
As I was saying
Re shot selection. Orlando was swinging the ball. C’s werent. Agree also re roles. The first 6 games, RR and Quis were the distributors and the C’s were hummin—so why is Eddie on the ball?
by Tenacious D on Nov 21, 2009 8:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
VW, an excellent post, particularly the point about tempo.
I hate to get involved in these post-loss discussions because they routinely degenerate into “How can I protect my favorite Celtic?” arguments, and this one’s no exception to some degree.
But this is an excellent post. There are some roles badly in need of redefinition – I do agree that Sheed and KG need to recognize when their outside games aren’t working and go down on the block when that happens – and there are some people who are just flatly laying a major egg – Rondo being foremost on that list.
You don’t talk about trading people after 13 games. What you do is watch some of the more worrisome trends on this team, like the lack of rebounding, the lack of an inside game and Rondo’s overall bad play at both ends of the floor.
Despite the loss, and with my coach’s hat on, I was pleased that Rivers sat Rondo in the fourth quarter. He had done little to deserve to be out there, and the message about his level of play needs to be sent.
by CoachBo on Nov 21, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
People were ripping on Rondo just a week ago for passing to much. Now he needs to distribute more.
by 18isGREATERthan72 on Nov 21, 2009 12:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There are enough players on this team to allow Doc to initiate some consequences for not playing roles. Pierce, Daniels, Perk, Shelden W., Scal, and Hudson – to the extent he’s played – have all shown the willingness to accept their role. Doc needs to remind these guys of the need to get back to what made them successful and play the guys who do that night in and night out.
by vwoodruff on Nov 21, 2009 8:20 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Rasheed Wallace Effect
The whole team plays like they’re disinterested. The 2005 Pistons analogy seems horribly appropriate and I’m thoroughly disgusted!
by BleedinGreen417 on Nov 21, 2009 8:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Big 3...Doc...DA...Wyc : They all rushed in to recruit Wallace last summer
Be careful what you wish for…They purchased the “Titantic” of all free agents!
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 8:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It`s primarily an "age" issue...It cannot be fixed
—KG is a shell of what he was, and he won`t be getting any better. The despair on his face was heart-breaking after the game.
—Wallace is unmotivated, avoids contact, and is content to miss 3-pointers all night long. Leopards don`t change their spots when they change teams. He is what he is.
—Pierce remains a true warrior at heart. But, like KG last night, the realization that the championship window has closed shut has hit him full force. He just witnessed his team lose a “statement” game at home, where the opponent shot a horrible 41% from the floor, and 57% from the FT line.
—Rondo`s FT shooting {25%} will soon become the “laugh” of the entire NBA. Serious “buyer`s remorse” is spreading through the organization to the tune of $55M.
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 8:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just fix your last issue (Rondo)
and we win. Not just his laughing-stock free throw percentage (most guys on this Blog could do better), but also his total lack of any sort of face-up shot.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Nov 21, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I love the logic here:
We won the title two years ago
Rondo is easily a better player now than then
But it’s his fault we’re losing this year.
Let’s just not mention the fact that we’re paying 20 million dollars to a guy who can’t play D and is given 12 shots a game. Let’s not mention the giant elephant in the room, that KG looks terrible at both ends: stiff on offense, can’t finish, not a double team threat, can’t move as well on defense, can’t chase down as many rebounds.
But yeah, let’s blame the young guy.
I’ve got news: Rond’s been the second best player on the team this year. Aside from Pierce, he’s the only one playing close to how they played last year and better than the title season. It’s the expectations around here that have changed. Did he have a bad game last night? Yes, a stinker. Can he improve many areas of his game? Yes, he still can. But it’s not his fault that 80% of this team is sucking, but somehow the old guys get a free pass.
by Fan from VT on Nov 21, 2009 9:03 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
There's plenty of blame to go around
But a I agree with you about Garnett. He looks awful— not hurt, just old and slow.
by Brickowski on Nov 21, 2009 9:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Could not disagree with this initial post more.
by CoachBo on Nov 21, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
THANK YOU!
Seriously, I wish I remember what the name of the article was in the Boston Globe (or Herald) and the writer was talking about how difficult it must be for Rondo – the C’s win and the Big 3 get all the credit, if they lose – it must be Rondo’s fault.
Yeah, the kid didn’t have a great game, but neither did anyone else. I agree that KG hasn’t been looking great this year – and I’m his biggest cheerleader when it comes time to not worrying about “the knee”. But his play this year so far is just AWFUL. We knew he wouldn’t be the same, but he just looks SLOW on defense. For a former Defensive Player of the Year, that’s troublesome.
You guys are complaining about Rondo’s contract but the kid has major upside . I’m far more concerned about KG’s. We owe him about $55m over the next 3 yrs, and he looks like he may not even make it until then cuz he’s gonna run out of gas. His intensity is nice and all, but his intensity is outweighing what he’s actually physically capable of at this point.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
by RJ87 on Nov 21, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, Ray Allen is turning into a black hole on offense
way too much dribbling and driving, that’s never been his game and its not lookin so hott now.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
by RJ87 on Nov 21, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Time's Winged Chariot is to Blame
They’re old and they’ve lost a step. Guys like Pierce, Allen, KG and even Rasheed used to be able to put a team on their backs. They can’t do that any more. Rondo can, but he’s inconsistent. And if he can’t make free throws, he’s no good at the end of a close game.
Look at the bright side. The Allen and Garnett trades brought one great championship win against the Lakers. But after watching last night’s game, it’s absolutely clear to me that it is 1988 all over again.
by Brickowski on Nov 21, 2009 9:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
We may not be able to win against Father Time...
but maybe we can hold him to a draw, if only for one last season.
by Casperian on Nov 21, 2009 9:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We can hold off Father time for one more playoff run.
Im convinced of that.
Mo, you can trade anything of mine.
by njnick on Nov 21, 2009 9:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Natural Rule of Law #1
Father Time is Undefeated!
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 9:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm leaning this way
It’s still pretty early, but if nothing changes, the question is what is Danny’s next move? Seems like Ray et al. would have to be traded if it came to that.
by Berkcelt on Nov 21, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1988 Was a Good Year
The team won an epic second round matchup with the Hawks. People remember Bird’s duel with Dominique more than they remember the Finals. Against Detroit, we had a good shot at winning. The league had decided they’d seen enough of the Celtics in the Finals, so they allowed Detroit to play “hugga-mugga” basketball and take the Conference Finals. No way our aging stars could put up with the physical pounding they endured from Laimbeer, Rodman, Salley, Mahorn et al. 1988 was a watershed. It was the end of the Bird-Magic-Doctor J beautiful offensive basketball era and the beginning of the incredibly boring “hugga-mugga” style of defensive basketball, perfected by the Pistons and then passed along to the Knicks in the 1990s. From 1980 to 1988 you had beautiful basketball. From 88 through most of the 90’s you had really boring, ugly basketball, punctuated only by Jordan’s individual brilliance. The Celtics beatdown of the Lakers in Game 6 was some of the most beautiful team ball of the last 20 years, but that used to be routine for the Showtime Lakers and Celtics.
On the matter of Garnett: I don’t think you can say he’s done. He appears to be at about 50%. These injuries can take 1-2 years for a player to regain leg strength, confidence and flexibility. He doesn’t have to be as good as he was in 07. He just has to be 90%. That gives us a low-post passer and opens the floor for everyone else. No, Paul, Ray etc. can’t create for themselves as well as they could some years ago. But it’s a synergistic thing. When Garnett gets back to normal, everyone on the team will be better. It might or might not happen, but I think there’s a possibility. I don’t think you can write the team or the season off at this point.
by KJR on Nov 21, 2009 7:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you want to live and die by Wallace´s three´s?
I don´t care if his shots were “in the flow of the offense”. If that´s true, than there´s something fundamentally wrong with the offense.
And if you´re 0-5 from behind the arc, you should be smart enough to realize that you have a cold night and not shoot three more.
We have a PG who can rebound but can´t shoot, and big men who play on the perimeter.
What do people think why there are different height requirements for the different positions?
You want your big men under the basket and your guards with respectable shooting skills for a reason.
In theory, it´s great if your big men can draw the defender away from the basket for a penetrating guard or have a wide-open shot. Guards have so many advantages after the rule changes of the last decade, and Rondo is so fast that this should be a lethal offense.
In theory…
The most important things are always the necessary ones.
The truth is, the skills you need to execute this offense are mostly secondary skills, and should only be used to mix it up. If your big men lack the toughness to play under the basket and grab rebounds, if your PG can´t shoot and can´t even hit a free throw, than they lack necessary skills.
Don´t tell me that we won a championship with that offense.We won it because of our defense first, and Doc was forced to let them play a bit differently, we had different personal (Powe, P.J. Brown), who were able to go straight for the basket in the post, etc.
The comparison doesn´t really work.
Our opponents basically dare Sheed to shoot the three, and this should be a sign for how embarassing our offense works at the moment.
We don´t live and die by Sheed´s threes per se, and Rondo is not the one who gets this team going per se, it´s Doc offense that leads to these things..
There is hope.
If KG can come back to 90% of the 2007 Ticket, than our defense could be good enough to make up for our terrible offense.
If Rondo finds a way to beat himself (because that´s his biggest opponent) consistently and every night, our offense could get a big boost.
by Casperian on Nov 21, 2009 9:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hopes were raised largely against crap teams
In the opener the Cavs were completely disorganized, so even though a huge statement, it didn’t show what would happen in the regular season grind. Pacers, Twolves and Nets games did. The big margins were built on Bobcats, 76ers, a Hornets team tanking to get rid of their coach, and injury-depleted Jazz and Warriors teams. The only “good” win was the Bulls game.
To witness the difference between the team’s play after a few days off and consecutive nights tells the tale, and Glen Davis isn’t going to fix it.
The bright side is that the Atlantic is the weakest division in the league, so a high seed will still be there at the end. There’s a chance for the pieces to come together or trades to gain some athleticism to happen, but the competition is going to have to have a lot of setbacks for the Celtics to get to the finals this year…
by nba is the worst on Nov 21, 2009 9:24 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Unduly Harsh
There’s no contending team that has exceeded expectations to date. All of them have looked bad at one time or another. The best performing teams are the Hawks and Suns, and I don’t think anyone is picking them to win it all.
Yes, the Celtics have played five good games, and eight bad games. During their good games, they’ve looked better than any other team in the league, and they would’ve beaten any other team they played on those nights (including the Lakers, Magic, Cavs, etc.) The Celtics best game is still better than anyone else’s best game.
What we’re discussing is why the Celtics have underperformed so badly in the last few weeks. It’s not like they’re playing well, but just coming up a bit short against better teams. They’ve flat out stunk on offense and defense. Their team chemistry is terrible. Their demeanor and communication is terrible.
The Celtics could have made it to the Finals last year playing with (essentially) six guys including only two up front (Perk and Baby). The team is a lot deeper this year. I don’t think they’ve figured out their identity or how to play together. It’s a long season. This team could finish with 50 wins and still win the Championship. If everyone gets enough rest at the end of the year, they could still beat any other team.
So, write us off if you want … but no other contending team has looked all that good so far either.
by KJR on Nov 21, 2009 8:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
History repeats in Three`s
1986—Celts Dominate
1987—Injuries prevent a repeat tile
1988—Old age sets in, team goes out quietly
2008—Celts Dominate
2009—Injuries prevent a repeat title
2010—Old age sets in, team will go out quietly
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 9:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Enough
Change your name if this is the way you feel or put it on ice until the next rebuilding phase is complete, according to your logic.
by KJ33 on Nov 21, 2009 10:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand...
I absolutely hate what is happening!
But, I`ve seen this play out before.
I was expecting a big year from the Celts… and never thought we`d be in this situation {rebuilding} so soon.
by Title 18 on Nov 21, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was bashed and hailed as a troll
When I respectfully suggested in August that this season the bill will be due for the 08 title.
Unless Kg comes back to “07 KG” The Over Weight lady has sung.
At least you will be spared the sight of watching Vince Carter Dismantle your team from the inside out.
I long for pizza eating Hedo….
Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...
by BS Patrol on Nov 21, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Team didn't go quietly in 88
They won an epic series against the Hawks, and the league allowed Detroit to cluster-mug our aging stars so that could have a different team in the Finals. That ushered in the Dark Ages of defensive basketball in the NBA (and the league went on a long slide). It is only now partially recovering thanks to the resurgence of the Celtics and the 08 Finals.
Note to David Stern: everyone wants the Celtics in the Finals again. Any other series is boring.
by KJR on Nov 21, 2009 8:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
offensive execution down the stretch is the problem
The Celtics had tied the game but were not able to keep up the pressure by scoring the ball. There was no ball movement or intelligence to what they were doing in the last two minutes of that game. It looked like they hit the panic button. Pierce was not able to generate a clean shot for himself. Allen just fumbled the ball away. It was awful and hard to watch.
The defense alone is not going to be enough to bail them out against the Joe Johnsons,Vince Carters, and Lebron James of the world. They need to be able to score the ball too.
by reggie35 on Nov 21, 2009 9:49 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
VWoodruff nails it
So did others. I’m worried about quite a few things, but as much as I love good smart offense, Jeff too is correct in that so much of it comes from our defense. Not sure if Big Baby’s return will make much difference there.
The most frustrating thing about all this to me is that I was REALLY happy with our bench, considering Rasheed and Daniels especially. Then I figured folks like Scalabrine and Allen would be gravy.
We have energy AND smart issues, and that’s a bad combo. I hope KG finds his legs; that’s probably worth an extra three points a game right there. But I’m also wondering if he will only come back so much from this thing.
I guess bringing in Iverson doesn’t make us younger, and might not spark the defense, but I do believe it’s time to move contracts now for help and not wait till the offseason.
by Big_Easy on Nov 21, 2009 9:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
What is missing is mental effort?
The Celtics are putting in the physical effort. Sure they are older and will get beaten on some plays by younger teams. That really isn’t their problem. They have to come out from the start playing defense like mad like they did two years ago. They are not making a mental effort to make teams respond to them. They are inconsistent in everything they do now. To me this shows an absence of mental effort. Winning is so much more fun than losing I don’t see why the team hasn’t figured out that they are only going to beat smart committed teams by playing hard and smart from the openting tap. It’s also time for Doc to try a few minor adjustments here and there just to see if he can kick start this team a bit.
Right now their first quarters are setting the tone for their games. They start out playing lazy mentally, which sometimes looks like physical laziness but is not always the same thing. Right now they have to come out with the attitude that we are gong to win the first quarter. And then try to do exactly the same thing for the next quarter.
Sheed needs to take fewer three-pointers. Right now none of them are going in. When Antoine was here there were thre pointers he was going to make, when he was going to make those when he was squared up to the basket and with his feet set. None of the rest were going to go in. I haven’t a clue as to which of Sheed’s are going in and neither does he.
Rondo needs to work on his free throws and a little jump shot. A couple of years ago his free throw shooting was improving and he had at least a marginal jump shot. You get the confidence to make those shots by making them in practice. I can already see the hint of a trend of teams treatment of Rondo that does not bode well for the future.
Right now I want Doc and the team to challenge themselve to just go out and win the first quarter. Their losses haven’t been flukes, they have been to reasonably good teams that have made the commitment to play hard from the start because they saw that as the way to beat the Celtics. There is plenty of time to turn this around but the Celtics are developing some very bad habits. If they don’t change them soon this will not only be a long frustrating year, but a number of frustrating years. I don’t think that will happen but right now the possibility is far greater than I would like.
by colt45s on Nov 21, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The big 3 were put in a position to win the game with the floor spread for them with Eddie house and rasheed wallace…
Rondo was having his worst game of the year, did what his coach said and was an observer from the sidelines…what he witnessed was the inability for the team to run a competent offensive set, old tired legs, missed shots, turnovers, and the inablity for pierce and ray to defend vince carter in the post.
So yes, rondo had a bad game, but all it proves is he remains the teams most important player…they can not win if he plays bad, the big 3 are too old, and too sluggish, and none are playing at an all star level.
spread the blame evenly, yes rondo played bad last night, but the inability for the rest of the team to even look competent when hes not playing good ball is a joke
by takeit on Nov 21, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Just shows how important it is
to have a PG who can hit a shot. Otherwise, it’s 4-on-5 offense (or 3-on-5 with Perk in there) all night long, which wears guys out after 45 minutes.
"People don't understand, if you can't live the rest of your life off one year in the NBA, you can't live off 21." -- Keon Clark
by Eeyore III on Nov 21, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
So now it’s Rondo AND Perk’s fault that we’re going through a rough patch?
Nevermind that KG looks just old and Ray seems to have forgotten how to pass.
Don't Trade Rondo or Perk!
by RJ87 on Nov 21, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Notes from the Shaolin Temple
“He who attacks must vanquish. He who defends must merely survive.” - Attack the basket more and crash the offensive boards – even at the cost of giving up a few fast break points. I
“The Yin and the Yang are opposite forces yet they exist together in the harmony of a perfect orb.” - good offense comes from good defense. If Rondo, Rasheed and and KG could play some straight up D and keep their man in front of them (Rondo tries to steal from behind and KG and Rasheed have no lateral movement) then our D would tighten up and thus more rebounds in which could attack more on the offensive end. PP and Ray Allen and MD are the ones playing some very good straight up D. I know we can fix this. Can turns into “DO” thru desire
‘Who can defeat himself? For what is evil but the self seeking to fulfill its own secret needs. All that is necessary is that we face it and choose.’" – we are in fact defeating ourselves lately but having a veteran team such as this who will methodically face the problems and choosing to fix them is what will bring us forward.
I still have faith because
“The present is rooted in the past. It is through these roots we draw nourishment and strength.”
It’s only November….Peace and Patience
Is it Soup Yet?
by Master Po on Nov 21, 2009 12:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
this is whats wrong
The Celtics offense and defense look real bad, like a team working too hard on every possession but coming up short everytime (35% FG pct and 2 for 18 3’s last night???)
On offense, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett have been too unselfish. We need to see them drawing double teams more rather than passing the ball to Perk, Rashweed, Eddie whom have single coverage. I think it is a mix of pierce being unselfish and garnett being tired that we arent seeing more 1 on 1 play from them to get the offense running.
We also havent seen a few stapled celtics plays run this year. i’m talking about paul pierce getting the ball around the elbows and foul line. remember this all the time last year? getting to paul’s sweet spot? i havent seen it once this year and it worked 90% of the time everytime.
by jiriwelsch on Nov 21, 2009 1:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Celts need BIG BABY !!!!!
Celts need BIG BABY !!!!!
that being said, the young ref call on Pierce foul when down 2 with a minute to go was absolute b.s. !!!!
by Snowball on Nov 21, 2009 2:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
they're old and their young guys aren't scorers
3 of the 5 starters are old and the other 2 have no offensive game. on the bench we have an old rasheed wallace and an undersized shooting guard in eddie house. marquis is not a scorer nor is williams. defensively ray allen is average at best and because we’re older we’ve lost a step in getting to the 3 point shooters. getting baby back wil help with picks as well as energy . did you notice last night that at the end of the game there was no one to set a pick for ray or paul. without perk or baby in the game they had to get open on their own. I think we’ll play better but unfortunately we’re not going to get younger. Based on what I’ve seen we’re not winning a championship with this team as constituted. I’d make the deal for nocioni or someone else. tony allen actually would have helped last night
by Red2 on Nov 21, 2009 4:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
over complicating things
This thread is looking at the problem to be too nuanced. Its not complicated.
The C’s are just plain shooting poorly. And it isn’t just Rasheed. He’s just more obvious because his misses are cannon shots from beyond the arc and highly visible. But far more painful are the number of shots that the C’s are missing from point blank. Even our lay-ups are an iffy adventure right now.
And I am talking about all the misses that are NOT contested and NOT poor shot selection. We are missing wide-open easy shots of all kinds.
Don’t give me this crap about bad tempo. There’s no tempo problem when you miss a wide open 3 footer.
This is nothing short of a team-wide shooting slump.
They shot the lights out in the first few games and the statistical pendulum has swung waaaayyy over to the dark side the last 6 games. It will eventually settle in the middle. And if they made just a tiny handful of those misses last night they win easily.
by mmmmm on Nov 21, 2009 8:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs




























